0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views13 pages

Battery Reference 6

The document presents a methodology for calibrating models of lithium-ion battery packs for electric vehicles. The methodology uses experimental data from battery cells and packs to calibrate a coupled electrochemical-thermal model of the battery pack in GT-Suite software. The results show that the methodology achieves good accuracy in predicting battery pack voltages and temperatures for different operating scenarios.

Uploaded by

zaheer hussain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views13 pages

Battery Reference 6

The document presents a methodology for calibrating models of lithium-ion battery packs for electric vehicles. The methodology uses experimental data from battery cells and packs to calibrate a coupled electrochemical-thermal model of the battery pack in GT-Suite software. The results show that the methodology achieves good accuracy in predicting battery pack voltages and temperatures for different operating scenarios.

Uploaded by

zaheer hussain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

Lithium-Ion Battery Pack Modeling for Electric Vehicles

in Mining Applications Using GT-AutoLion


Majid Astaneh
[email protected]

Division of Vehicle Engineering and Autonomous Systems & Division of Fluid Dynamics
Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences
Chalmers University of Technology

October 13, 2020

10/26/2020 Chalmers 1
Project Summary
Title:
Interaction between micro and macro processes in battery-powered vehicles

Partners:

Funder:

Members:
Majid Astaneh, Henrik Ström, Jelena Andric, Dario Maggiolo

10/26/2020 Chalmers 2
Problem: Lithium-Ion Battery Pack Modeling for Electric Mining Vehicles

Solution: Calibration Optimization Methodology Using GT-AutoLion/GT-SUITE

https://www.danfoss.com/

Cell Pack Vehicle

10/26/2020 Chalmers 3
Experimental Data

Cell experimental data


• OCV curves from low rate capacity check test
• Voltage and temperature profiles under cycling
• Data are available for four cell samples

1 2 3 4
Battery pack test scenarios
• C/2 Charge + Rest + 1.5 C Discharge Calibration
• C/2 Charge + Rest + C/2 Discharge
Evaluation
• 1.1 C Charge + Rest + 1.5 C Discharge
https://northvolt.com/

10/26/2020 Chalmers 4
Methodology: Battery Pack Modeling

Lumped Model

Aggregate Cell

Module-to-Module Discretization Approach

Coupled Electrical and Electrochemical-Thermal Model

10/26/2020 Chalmers 5
Methodology: Battery Pack Modeling

Battery pack topology leads to:


• Current imbalances in the battery pack
Current
• Inhomogeneities in cells’ states of charge
• Temperature gradients
• Localized aging

Research gap in battery pack modeling:


• Mostly simplified battery cell models were used
• Few number of connected cells were considered
• A battery pack model calibration method is missed

10/26/2020 Chalmers 6
Methodology: Calibration Optimization Framework

10/26/2020 Chalmers 7
Results: Cell Calibration Optimization

Aggregate Cell

C/20

RRMSE=0.253% RRMSE=0.282%

Influential factors in OCV calibration optimization: Electrode Loadings, First Charge/ Discharge Capacities, OCV@ 100% SOC.

10/26/2020 Chalmers 8
Results: Cell Calibration Optimization
Aggregate Cell
C/5 C/2

1C
C/3
C/3 C/3

RRMSE=0.98% RRMSE=1.08%

RRMSE=2.96% RRMSE=3.07%

Influential factors in cycling calibration optimization: Cathode/ Electrolyte Diffusivities, Cathode Reaction Rate,
Contact Resistance, Heat Transfer Coefficient.

10/26/2020 Chalmers 9
Results: Lumped Pack Model Calibration Optimization
Calibration Scenario

C/3

C/2
1.5 C

RRMSE=1.32% RRMSE=5.38%

Evaluation Scenarios
2nd Scenario 3rd Scenario
(C/2 Charge + Rest + C/2 Discharge) (1.1 C Charge + Rest + 1.5 C Discharge)

RRMSEV, term 0.80% 0.74%

RRMSET, av g 2.0% 8.24%

10/26/2020 Chalmers 10
Results: M2M Battery Pack Model Calibration Optimization
Calibration Scenario

RRMSE=5.68%
C/3
C/2
Evaluation Scenarios
RRMSE=1.67%
1.5 C
2nd Scenario 3rd Scenario
(C/2 Ch. + R + C/2 Disch.) (1.1 C Ch. + R + 1.5 C Disch.)

RRMSEV, term 0.80% 1.54%

RRMSE=7.08% RRMSE=4.0% RRMSET, avg 4.19% 11.50%

RRMSET, max 4.26% 12.27%

RRMSET, min 1.48% 6.70%

Influential factors in M2M Battery Pack Model calibration optimization:


Heat Transfer Coefficients, Interconnection Resistance

10/26/2020 Chalmers 11
Conclusions
• A novel methodology for calibration optimization of coupled electrical and electrochemical-thermal
model of lithium-ion battery packs was proposed.

• Simulations and optimizations were performed in GT-SUITE/GT-AutoLion software and the experimental
data were received from Northvolt AB.

• The proposed methodology considers both the intrinsic and extrinsic cell-to-cell variations in a battery pack.

• Results showed that the RRMSE for the voltage prediction is 0.7–1.7% and for the average pack temperature 2–12%.

• The proposed methodology is general and can be applied to other battery chemistries and electric vehicle types.

Astaneh, M.; Andric, J.; Löfdahl, L.; Maggiolo, D.; Stopp, P.; Moghaddam, M.; Chapuis, M.; Ström, H. Calibration Optimization
Methodology for Lithium-Ion Battery Pack Model for Electric Vehicles in Mining Applications. Energies 2020, 13, 3532.
(https://doi.org/10.3390/en13143532)

10/26/2020 Chalmers 12
Thanks for your attention

Recharge Your Batteries…

Financial support from:

Dr. Majid Astaneh


[email protected]

10/26/2020 Chalmers 13

You might also like