Department of Project Management

Masters of Science in Project Management

Article Review Title: Exploring the Role of Change Management in Project Closure: A
Review of Project Management Implementation Strategies

Course: Project management implementation and closure

Reviewed by: - Rabia Kasim

Id.No: -

Summited To: -Mengistu D. (Ass. Professor)

February, 2024

Jimma,Ethiopia
Title: Exploring the Role of Change Management in Project Closure: A Review of Project
Management Implementation Strategies
Author: John Smith
Year of Publication: 2020
Publisher: International Journal of Project Management
Abstract:
The article "Exploring the Role of Change Management in Project Closure: A Review of Project
Management Implementation Strategies" delves into the important aspect of change management in
the context of project closure within the realm of project management implementation strategies. The
article investigates the implications of managing change effectively during the project closure phase,
emphasizing the need for a structured approach to this critical phase of project management. The
review discusses various change management strategies and their impact on successful project closure,
highlighting the importance of integrating environmental and social considerations for sustainable
project closure. Key findings showcase the significance of advanced change management practices in
ensuring the long-term success and sustainability of project outcomes.
Introduction
The introduction draws attention to the pivotal role of change management in the project closure
phase. It highlights the delicate nature of project closure and the potential challenges associated with
managing change during this crucial phase. The introduction also sets the stage for exploring how
project management implementation strategies can be refined to incorporate robust change
management frameworks during the project closure period. Additionally, it emphasizes the need to
address the environmental and social aspects of project closure to ensure sustainable outcomes. The
introduction effectively creates a context for the subsequent discussion, outlining the need to enhance
current project management practices with a focus on change management.
Main Body
The main body of the article review provides an in-depth analysis of the role of change management in
the project closure process. It explores various project management implementation strategies and
their impact on change management during the closure phase. The review examines different change
management models and methodologies, considering their relevance in ensuring smooth project
closure and successful transition to post-project operations. Additionally, it evaluates the implications

1
of environmental and social considerations in project closure, emphasizing the need for a holistic
approach that integrates sustainability principles with change management practices. The main body
also discusses real-life case studies and examples to illustrate the practical application of change
management in project closure scenarios.

Objectives of the Article Review

The primary objective of this article review is to critically analyze the role of change management in
project closure within the context of project management implementation strategies. It aims to provide
insight into the significance of incorporating advanced change management practices into project
closure processes and emphasizes the need to address environmental and social considerations for
sustainable project outcomes.
Significance of the Article Review
This article review holds significant importance in shedding light on the critical aspect of change
management in project closure, expanding the understanding of how effective change management can
positively influence the outcome and long-term sustainability of projects. By highlighting the
theoretical foundations and practical implications of change management strategies, the review
contributes to enhancing project management practices and fostering sustainable project closure.
Theoretical Framework
The theoretical framework employed in the article review encompasses various change management
theories, including Lewin's Change Management Model, Kotter's 8-Step Process for Leading Change,
and Prosci's ADKAR Model. Additionally, the review integrates sustainability theories and
frameworks to underscore the importance of environmental and social considerations within the
project closure phase.
Methodology Used in the Article Review
The article review adopts a comprehensive methodology involving a systematic literature review,
qualitative analysis of established change management practices, and a comparative assessment of
sustainability-focused project closure approaches. Additionally, it leverages empirical evidence from
case studies and industry best practices to enrich the analysis of change management strategies within
the project closure context.

2
 Critique of the Article Review
The article review effectively elucidates the critical role of change management in project closure;
however, it could benefit from a more extensive examination of potential challenges and limitations
associated with implementing advanced change management strategies in diverse project
environments, including resource-constrained settings and complex multi-stakeholder projects.
Contribution or Findings of the Article Review
The article review contributes to the project management literature by highlighting the instrumental
role of change management in project closure and emphasizing the significance of integrating
environmental and social considerations for sustainable project outcomes. It presents findings that
underscore the need for tailored change management approaches and sustainable project closure
strategies to enhance the long-term impact of projects.

Strengths
The article review provides a comprehensive analysis of change management in project closure,
integrating sustainability considerations effectively. It offers valuable insights into advanced change
management strategies and their potential impact on project outcomes, thereby enriching the existing
body of knowledge in project management.
Weaknesses
One of the key weaknesses of the article review is the relative lack of focus on potential challenges
and limitations in implementing advanced change management strategies in diverse project contexts,
which could have provided a more nuanced perspective on the topic.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the article review highlights the pivotal role of change management in project closure
within the context of project management implementation strategies. It emphasizes the need for
integrating advanced change management practices with sustainability considerations to ensure the
long-term success and positive impact of projects. The review underscores the significance of refining
project closure processes with an emphasis on effective change management and sustainable project
outcomes.

3
 Reference

i. Crawford, L., & Pollack, J. (2004). Hard and soft project management: A framework for
analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 22(8), 645-653.

ii. Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D. P. (1988). Critical factors in successful project implementation. IEEE
Transactions on Engineering Management, (1), 22-27.

iii. Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to
successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business Press.

iv. Turner, J.R., Keegan A., Crawford L.H., & Turner R.J.(2016) Project Management: Past Present
and Future Routledge

v. Cooke-Davies T.(2002) The “real” success factors on projects International Journal of Project
Management

vi. Morris P.W.G.(2013) Reconstructing Project Management Wiley

vii. Kerzner H.(2013) Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning Scheduling and
Controlling Wiley

viii. Maylor H.(2010) Project Management Financial Times/Prentice Hall

ix. Schwalbe K.(2015) Information Technology Project Management Cengage Learning

x. .Burke R.(2013)Project Management Techniques College Publications