COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL

BASELINE
2024 BASELINE DATA

Name of School: # of Teaching Personnel:

School ID: # of Non-Teaching Personnel:
District: # of Learners:

DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS

Related Sendai
Global Comprehensive
Framework for If YES, present MOVs/ If NO
School Safety (CSS)
DRR (SFDRR) state your PLAN/ TARGETS
TARGET AREAS
Priorities (Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and School
Yes (2024)NO
DRRM Manual)
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
Adopted/Adapted/localized existing policies relating to DRRM
Priority for Action 2 Legal Frameworks & Policies 1
in education/school safety
2 Designated School DRRM Focal Person
Organizational arrangements,
Priority for Action 2 leadership, and coordination for Formed School DRRM Team, consisting of personnel from
risk reduction and resilience 3 different offices; with defined membership and roles and
responsibilities/functions
Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes
4 CCA and EiE measures, covering risk assessment, risk
reduction, and rehabilitation and recovery
Integration of risk reduction and
Priority for Action 1 resilience into education sector 5 Students participated in the planning process
strategies, policies and plans 6 Integrated DRRM into the School Improvement Plan (SIP)

7 100% completion of DRR related questions in the EMIS/EBEIS

8 Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget

Funding sources for interventions in the aftermath of a disaster
Funding for risk reduction and 9
Priority for Action 3 or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.
resilience of education sector
School has partnerships that could be tapped to support its
10
DRRM programs and activities, including those after a disaster
Conducted student-led school watching and hazard mapping
11
(DO 23 s 2015)
Incorporated results of student-led school watching and
12
hazard mapping in the School DRRM Plan and SIP
Priority for Action 1 Child-centered Risk Assessment Linked student-led school watching and hazard mapping with
13
the community hazard maps of LGUs provided by DOST

School Planning Team have linked the community hazard

14
maps with education data to better understand the school’s risk

School submitted Rapid Assessment of Damage Report

15 (RADAR) to the DRRMS Central Office, within 72 hours after
the onslaught of a hazard in the area
Data collection and consolidation of programs and activities on
Priority for Action 3 Monitoring and Evaluation 16 DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and impact
exist
PILLAR 1: SAFE LEARNING FACILITIES
Existing schools are being made safer, systematically Number TARGETS/ PLANS
Assessment and prioritization for 1 # of school buildings that has been inventoried
Priority for Action 1 retrofiting and replacement of 2 # of school buildings with risk assessment
unsafe schools 3 # of unsafe school buildings identified
BASELINE
PILLAR 1: SAFE LEARNING FACILITIES TARGETS/ PLANS
YES NO
Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school
4
building construction exist
Financial resources are allocated for completion of needed
Resources and Plan to address 5 action to address unsafe school buildings within a specified
Priority for Action 3 period
unsafe school buildings
Number of unsafe school buildings with appropriate action
6 undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, retrofitted,
non-usage, etc.)
Conducted regular school inspection and maintenance of
7
facilities conducted (state how often)
Undertaken regular repair of minor classroom (including
8
Maintenance to increase safety facilities) damages
Priority for Action 3 and protection of investments in Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
9
schools documented and assigned
School Heads have allotted budget for routine maintenance of
10 school facilities for safety and to protect investments, with
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level
School Heads have identified those schools that are expected
11 to be used as temporary evacuation centers for disasters

Planning for limited use of schools

Priority for Action 4 as evacuation centers, during the
school year
 Planning for limited use of schools School Heads are clear with the roles and functions of the
Priority for Action 4 as evacuation centers, during the school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and DSWD as
school year per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, series of 2013
12 "Guidelines on Evacuation Center Coordination and
Management" and RA 10821 "Children's Emergency Relief
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR
Every new school built is safe
13 Guidance and regulations on the following are followed:
Guidance and regulations for safe safe school site selection
Priority for Action 2 resilient design, and
school construction
resilient construction
14 New school construction is monitored for compliance with:
Monitoring of safe school site safe school site selection
Priority for Action 2
selection, design and construction safe school design
safe school construction
PILLAR 2: DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT
Existence of national and sub- School has a Contingency Plan, i.e. Preparedness Plan turned
national plans for preparedness 1 into response actions when a disaster strikes (This could be a
and response, educational separate section/chapter in the DRRM Plan)
continuity, and protection of School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid kit in
education sector investments 2
every instructional classroom
School has at least 2 necessary and functioning equipment, in
3 case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, handheld/base radio,
generator, etc.)
School has pre-identified spaces for putting up Temporary
4
Learning spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a disaster
School has ready resumption strategies and alternative
5
Priority for Action 4 delivery modes to ensure education continuity
School has ensured that students completed the Family
6 Earthquake Prepareness Plan; and school has reported
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office
School has established a school personnel tracking
7
system/protocol in the event of a disaster
School has trained personnel to administer first aid to students
8
and personnel
School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and
9
students
School has trained teachers and other personnel who could
10
provide psychosocial support to students
School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
Annual review of school disaster 11
reviewed annually
risk reduction and management
Conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure school safety and
Priority for Action 4 measures (e.g. as part of school- 12
preparedness measures are in place as per DO
based management and/or school
improvement) Students, teachers, parents and other stakeholders
13
participated in Brigada Eskwela
School has established functional early warning system to
inform students and personnel of hazards and emergencies
14
(protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), considering national
Conduct of regular simulation drill, and LGU warning systems and protocols
at all levels, to practice response School conducted regular hazard-specific drills (at least 3
Priority for Action 4 preparedness and to review 15 hazards) with participation of stakeholders (BFP, Medic, LGUs,
response plans (i.e. Contingency NGOs, community, PTA, alumni, and others)
Plan) 16 Number of students who participated in the drills
17 School has an evacuation plan and procedures
School has a student-family reunification plan that is clearly
18
disseminated to students, teachers and parents
School Head has received DRRM training from division or
19
region or partners
Needs assessment, strategy, and School DRRM Team has received DRRM training from
implementation plan to develop 20
division or region or partners (indicate how many)
Priority for Action 3 staff and student capacity for
School has conducted awareness and capacity building for
participation in school based 21
families and learners
DRRM
School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EiE activities of
22
the LGU
PILLAR 3: RISK REDUCTION AND RESILIENCE EDUCATION
School has integrated key DRR and CCA concepts in the
1
curriculum based on the National Curriculum Guide
Integration of common risk 2 Year when DRR and CCA integration in the curriculum started
Priority for Action 3 reduction and resilience
messages in the curriculum Grade levels and subjects where DRR and CCA been
3
integrated
Skills and competencies of students are assessed through
measurable learning and risk reduction (RR) outcomes
Intergration of risk reduction and
Percentage of students actively participating in various
Priority for Action 3 resilience in extra-curricular 4
DRRM/CCA/EiE activities
activities
School has a DRRM capacity building plan for teachers and
5
school personnel
Capacity building for and
Priority for Action 3 personnel on risk reduction and
 Capacity building for and 6 Number personnel trained on DRRM and/or CCA
Priority for Action 3 personnel on risk reduction and School has available and accessible quality and up-to-date
7
resilience education DRRM materials
Presence of DRRM corner, with updated IEC materials posted
8
in it, in every classroom
School carries out monitoring and evaluation to assess
Priority for Action 3 Monitoring and Evaluation 9
sustainable implementation

Risk Assessment Matrix (Hazard Probability)

Hazard Probability (HP)
Rating Capacity Rating (1=lowest;
Hazards
5=highest)
(Yes or No)
YES NO
Earthquake*
Cyclone *(Typhoon)
Fire
Flooding
Tornado
Landslide
Drought
Tsunami
Volcanic eruption
Security Threat
(i.e. armed conflict, lock down, etc.)
Health Threat (i.e., COVID-19, Dengue, Malaria)
Other. Please Specify__________________
*The entire country has a high risk from the threat of the hazards of earthquakes and cyclones. Thus, risk reduction
measures are mandatory for all schools for these hazards.

School is identified as Evacuation Center (Yes/No):

Evaluated by: _____________________________________________

School DRRM Coordinator Signature Over Printed Name / Contact No.
Date Signed: _____________________________________________
Contact No. of the School DRRM Coordinator: _____________________________________________

Reviewed and Approved by: _____________________________________________

Name and Signature of School Head: _____________________________________________
Date Signed: _____________________________________________
Contact No of the School Head: _____________________________________________

Received by: DR. MARVIN M. NICER, MCDRM

Project Development Officer II
Division DRRM Coordinator
09154259803