LQ2 Des Aid Ugrd

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

1

Step-by-Step Procedure for Obtaining the Pressure Diagram for Cantilever


Sheet-Pile Wall Penetrating a Granular Soil

Calculation of Maximum Bending Moment

2
Sheet-Pile wall in Dry Sand

where:

3
Step-by-Step Procedure for Obtaining the Pressure Diagram Cantilever
Sheet-Pile Wall Penetrating Clay

Calculation of Maximum Bending Moment

4
Cantilever Sheet Piling Penetrating Clay

Cantilever Sheet Piles Penetrating Sandy Soil—A Simplified Approach

5
Anchored Sheet-Pile Walls
Free Earth Support Method for Penetration of Sandy Soil—A Simplified
Approach

Taking the moment about O,

Design Charts for Free Earth Support Method (Penetration into Sandy Soil)

6
Variation of GD with l1/(L1 + L2) and ϕ’ (Based on Hagerty, D. J. and Nofal, M. M. (1992).

7
Variation of CDL1 with l1/(L1 + L2) and ϕ’ (Based on Hagerty, D. J. and Nofal, M.
M. (1992).
Variation of GF with l1/(L1 + L2) and ϕ’ (Based on Hagerty, D. J. and Nofal, M. M. (1992).

Variation of CFL1 with l1/(L1 + L2) and ϕ’ (Based on Hagerty, D. J. and Nofal, M. M. (1992).
Variation of GM with l1/(L1 + L2) and ϕ’ (Based on Hagerty, D. J. and Nofal, M. M. (1992).

Variation of CML1 with l1/(L1 + L2) and ϕ’ (Based on Hagerty, D. J. and Nofal, M. M. (1992).
Computational Pressure Diagram Method for Penetration into Sandy Soil

An anchor sheet-pile wall with a Computational pressure Diagram


granular soil backfill method (Note: L1 + L2 = L)

Range of Values for C and R

10
11
Free Earth Support Method for Penetration of Clay

12
Pressure Envelope for Braced-Cut Design
 Design of cuts in sand

Peck’s (1969) apparent-pressure


envelope for cuts in sand

 Cuts in Clay
The pressure envelope for soft to medium clay is shown and
is applicable to the condition:

Peck’s (1969) apparent- pressure envelope


for cuts in soft to medium clay

The pressure envelope for cuts in stiff clay is shown, in which:

It is applicable to the condition γH/c < 4.

Peck’s (1969) apparent-pressure envelope for


cuts in stiff clay
Pressure Envelope for Cuts in Layered Soil

Layered soil in braced cuts

where γc is the saturated unit weight of clay layer.

Layered soil in braced cuts

Depth of tensile crack:

With ϕ = 0, Ka = tan2(45 – ϕ/2) = 1, so:


Design of Various Components of a Braced Cut
 Strut
Step 1. Depending on the soil, assume one of the three apparent-pressure envelopes.
Step 2. The assumption of hinges makes it possible to separate the pressure diagram into a
series of cantilever (top and bottom) and simply supported (the middle ones) beams.
Step 3. With center-to-center horizontal strut spacing of s, the strut loads can be
summarized as follows.

Step 4. Knowing the strut loads at each level and the intermediate bracing conditions allows
selection of the proper sections from the steel construction manual.

 Sheet Piles
Step 1. For each of the sections shown, determine the maximum bending moment.
Step 2. Determine the maximum value of the maximum bending moments (Mmax) obtained
in Step 1. Note that the unit of this moment will be, for example, kN-m/m length of the
wall.
Step 3. Obtain the required section modulus of the sheet piles, namely:

Step 4. Choose a sheet pile having a section modulus greater than or equal to the required
section modulus from a table such as Table 18.1

 Wales
Bottom Heave of a Cut in Clay

Heaving in braced cuts in clay (ϕ= 0)

Force on the buried length of sheet pile


Stability of the Bottom of a Cut in Sand

Determining the factor of safety against piping by drawing a flow net


Stability of the bottom of a cut in sand

Where:
a = length of the flow element at A (or B)
Nd = number of drops
Variation of modulus (Based on Groundwater and Seepage, by M. E. Harr. McGraw-Hill, 1962)

Perform the following steps:


1. Determine the modulus, m, from Variation of modulus by obtaining 2L2/B (or B/2L2) and
2L1/B.
2. With the known modulus and 2L1/B, examine Variation of maximum exit gradient with
modulus and determine L2imax(exit)/h. Because L2 and h will be known, imax(exit) can be calculated.
3. The factor of safety against piping can be evaluated by using:
Variation of maximum exit gradient with modulus (Based on Groundwater and Seepage, by M. E. Harr. McGraw-Hill, 1962)

You might also like