What Is The Difference Between Clean Flux and No Clean Flux Off PCB
What Is The Difference Between Clean Flux and No Clean Flux Off PCB
What Is The Difference Between Clean Flux and No Clean Flux Off PCB
Off PCB ?
Introduction
Flux plays a critical role during the PCB soldering process, facilitating bonding between component
leads, pads, and solder. Traditional clean fluxes require removal after soldering to prevent corrosion, while
modern no-clean formulations can eliminate post-solder cleaning. This provides efficiency advantages, but
no-clean flux has limitations too. Understanding the key differences allows selecting the optimal flux type
for a particular application.
Gaining a deeper understanding of flux technology enables optimizing the soldering process for efficiency,
quality, and reliability across the wide range of electronics assembly applications.
Before comparing clean and no-clean fluxes, it helps to understand what flux does. The main purposes of
flux during soldering are:
Solder alloy and metal component surfaces form thin oxidized contamination layers. Flux chemically strips
these oxides so solder can wet and adhere to the clean surfaces underneath.
Preventing Re-Oxidation
Once surface oxides are removed, flux provides a protective barrier preventing re-oxidation while the solder
is molten during reflow or hand soldering.
Facilitating Wetting
Flux modifies surface tension properties to allow molten solder to spread out, cover, and wet the component
and board surfaces thoroughly.
Residue Removal
Some flux residues must be cleaned after soldering to prevent harmful effects on the assembly. No-clean
fluxes aim to not require cleaning.
Flux formulations utilize various chemistries, which dictate their properties and best usage. Common flux
chemistry types include:
The most common traditional flux, composed of natural rosin extracted from pine sap. Lower activity and
non-corrosive. Requires cleaning.
Synthetic carboxylic acids as the main activator. Moderate activity, suitable for soldering many metallic
surfaces. Usually requires cleaning.
Contains strong mineral acids as activators. Highly active but much more corrosive. Typically requires
cleaning.
Blend of organic acids and amine hydrohalide activators. Moderate activity, but residues are water washable.
Varied chemistries with mild organic activators. Low solids residue designed not to need cleaning after
soldering.
There is some overlap between the properties of these categories, but this generalization highlights the key
traits of each flux type.
Clean fluxes represent the traditional general-purpose option, encompassing rosin (RA), organic acid (OA)
and inorganic acid (IA) formulations. Key characteristics include:
Clean fluxes exhibit moderate to excellent soldering capability for surfaces with heavier oxidation or
contamination. Rosin provides the gentlest clean flux, with increasing activity through OA and maximum
activity from IA types.
Flux activators are often acidic compounds that can damage board and component materials if residues
remain. Even mildly activated rosin fluxes require removal.
The residues must be fully washed away after soldering using suitable solvents. Any remaining activators
may continue attacking materials.
Readily Available
Clean fluxes have been used for decades in electronics assembly. Numerous suppliers offer a wide range of
chemistries, gels, applicators, and supporting cleaning processes.
Clean fluxes provide strong soldering performance for difficult surfaces, but do necessitate process steps for
post-solder residue removal.
No-clean fluxes were developed starting in the early 1990s to simplify assembly by eliminating the cleaning
stage. Key attributes include:
No-clean formulations have just 1-5% flux residue content versus up to 35% for some paste fluxes. This
reduces total residues.
Mild Activators
No-clean fluxes use relatively gentle organic activators that are minimally reactive after soldering when
cooled. This reduces potential for damage.
If applied properly within limits, no-clean fluxes leave safe, benign residues that do not require removal after
soldering.
Reduced flux activity can increase defects. Residues may still cause issues in some environments over time.
No-clean flux provides production efficiencies but requires balancing tradeoffs in soldering quality, material
compatibility, and long-term reliability.
Clean and no-clean fluxes exhibit significant differences in their properties and performance which guide
appropriate application:
Clean fluxes utilize fairly strong activators to promote effective soldering. Common compositions include:
Rosin Flux
Higher activity clean fluxes give better soldering performance but create more reactive residues requiring
thorough removal.
In contrast, no-clean fluxes utilize much milder organic activators and low solids content:
Activity: Low-moderate
The relatively gentle organic acids allow no-clean fluxes to be left on assemblies after soldering without
significant material risks.
Since flux residues remain on the PCB assembly after soldering, the properties of these residues determine
whether cleaning is required:
Since no-clean fluxes do not get removed, their residues must not interfere with circuit function or degrade
the assembly over time. Here are key reliability factors to weigh for clean versus no-clean:
No-clean residues must not substantially lower electrical resistance allowing potential leakage currents.
Clean fluxes provide higher SIR.
Ionic residues absorb moisture and can create dendritic growths that electrically short traces. No-clean fluxes
inhibit migration but risks remain.
Corrosion Potential
Reactive residues may continue attacking component leads and board metalization over time, eventually
compromising connections. Less risk with no-clean but still possible.
Interfacial Compatibility
Flux activators could affect interfaces between component encapsulants or conformal coatings. No-clean
residues are designed to be compatible.
Cosmetic Appearance
No-clean leaves clear, shiny residues versus discolored residues from cleaned fluxes. Cosmetics are
unimportant for hidden solder joints.
While designed to mitigate reliability risks, no-clean fluxes demand tightly controlled processes and have
limitations regarding sustainability and service environments.
PCB Cleaning
The core difference between clean and no-clean fluxes is whether soldered assemblies require post-process
cleaning:
Applying the optimal amount of flux is critical for both clean and no-clean usage:
Application Methods
Brush
Dropper
Spray
Foam
Automatic dispensing
Controlled Parameters
Consistent Processes
Controlling flux application improves soldering yield while minimizing residues. This benefits both cleaned
and no-clean assemblies.
Here are guidelines to follow when using clean fluxes requiring post-solder cleaning:
Select flux chemistry with appropriate activity level for the surfaces being soldered
Apply minimum flux needed for effective soldering
Use foam fluxes or controlled dispensing for tight process control
Clean flux off boards as soon as possible after soldering
Validate cleaning efficacy with SIR testing
Work with environmental regulations regarding cleaning solvents
Closely following flux manufacturer recommendations enables utilizing cleaning fluxes effectively while
mitigating risks.
No-clean fluxes require disciplined process control and validation to avoid hidden reliability risks from
residues.
Best practices for flux storage and handling maximize shelf life and avoid process issues:
Store flux in original containers away from heat, cold, and contaminants
For refrigerated flux, allow it to reach room temperature before use
Mix flux containers before use to re-disperse settled solids
Keep flux containers covered during breaks in use to avoid evaporation
Avoid contaminating fluxes with dust or metals
Never mix used applicators back into flux containers
Handle fluxes safely using proper PPE like gloves and eye protection
Proper flux handling prevents variability, maintains activation capability, and reduces defects.
Conclusion
Clean and no-clean fluxes each have characteristics making them preferable for certain applications:
For specialized industrial, aerospace, automotive, and military applications, the risks of no-clean flux may
outweigh the efficiency benefits. But no-clean has become the norm in high-volume consumer electronics
where process controls can be implemented.
In summary, understanding clean versus no-clean flux properties allows selecting the optimal flux chemistry
for each application’s performance, efficiency, and reliability requirements. Proper control of flux amount,
soldering process, and cleaning or residue mitigation steps are also essential to unlock the benefits of each
flux type.
Here are some common questions about clean and no-clean fluxes:
It is difficult since no-clean fluxes are engineered to avoid dissolving in common cleaning solvents.
Secondary cleaning processes may only partially remove no-clean residues. It is better to ensure residues are
benign rather than try cleaning.
For very high-reliability applications where no-clean chemistry limitations would risk product function –
aerospace, military, medical, etc. Also in large solder bath processes where higher activity is needed.
Minimal visible residues if the soldering process is optimized. The residues are designed to become clear
and practically invisible once solidified after soldering.
Yes, but the flux chemistry must be tailored to be water-soluble. General no-clean types are not readily
washable with just water.
Refrigerated shelf life is typically 1-2 years for most flux chemistries. For ambient storage, shelf life ranges
from 3-9 months. Manufacturer guidelines should be followed.
Conclusion
Both clean and no-clean flux chemistries remain essential for electronics assembly. Understanding their
composition, properties, reliability factors, and process recommendations allows engineers to select the
optimal flux type for each application. With careful control of flux amount and the soldering process, high
product quality and efficiency can be achieved.
Related Posts:
1. No-Clean Flux vs. Water Soluble Flux: Which is the Best PCB Cleaning Agent?
https://www.raypcb.com/clean-flux-and-no-clean-flux-off-pcb/