Proposal Accoun
Proposal Accoun
Proposal Accoun
i
ABSTRACT
Micro finance institutions have a significant role for the development of one’s country economic
development by providing a credit and saving service for those productive clients. Though there
are many factors that can affect the efficiency of the institution like, loan management and
processing system, cash management, and loan repayment performance. The study will be
conducted with the aim of analyzing the factors that influence micro-finance loan repayment
performance, specifically in Amhara credit and saving institution in Gondar city branch using
primary data collection through self-administering questionnaire. The study intends to assess the
factors affecting loan repayment performance of the beneficiaries of ACSI. In order to achieve
this objective, the study will be adopted mixed research approach. Primarily data will be
collected from 15 institution’s employees holding different positions selected through purposive
sampling techniques using a self-administering questionnaire. Moreover, secondary data will be
obtained from the annual financial report of ACSI. For the data analysis, descriptive statistics
including percentage through statistics will use to assess or describe the phenomena or variables
that influencing repayment rate. The findings of the study show that credit term, credit
monitoring, collateralized loan and loan supervision by the institution assign as the causes of
nonperforming loan.
i
ACRONYM:
ACSI: -Amhara credit and saving institution
MFI: - Micro-finance institution
ii
Table of contents
ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................................i
ACRONYM:................................................................................................................................................ii
Table of contents........................................................................................................................................iii
CHAPTER ONE..........................................................................................................................................1
1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1
1.1. BACK GROUND OF THE STUDY................................................................................................1
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM.................................................................................................3
1.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY.........................................................................................................5
1.3.1 GENERAL OBJECTIVE............................................................................................................5
1.3.2 SPESIFIC OBJECTIVE.....................................................................................................................5
1.4 RESEARCH QUESTION..................................................................................................................5
1.5 SIGNIFICANT OF THE STUDY.....................................................................................................5
1.6 SCOPE OR DELIMITATION OF THE STUDY..............................................................................6
CHAPTER TWO.........................................................................................................................................7
2. LITERATURE REVIEW........................................................................................................................7
2.1 Theoretical Literatures.......................................................................................................................7
2.1.1. The concept of microfinance services and its importance..........................................................7
2.1.2. Loan Repayment Performance of borrowers..............................................................................9
2.1.3 FACTORS OF LOAN REPAYMENT PERFORMANCE.......................................................11
2.2. EMPERICAL LITERATURE:.......................................................................................................14
2.2.1. STUDIES OUTSIDE ETHIOPIA............................................................................................14
2.2.2. STUDIES WITH IN ETHIOPIA.............................................................................................15
Conceptual framework......................................................................................................................17
CHAPTER THREE...................................................................................................................................18
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY..............................................................................................................18
3. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................18
3.1 RESEARCH APPROACH..............................................................................................................18
3.2 RESEARCH DESIGN.....................................................................................................................18
3.3 POPULATION SAMPLING...........................................................................................................18
iii
3.3.1 TARGET POPULATION.........................................................................................................19
3.3.2 SAMPLING TECHNIQUE:.....................................................................................................19
3.3.3 SAMPLE SIZE:........................................................................................................................20
3.3.4 SOURCE AND METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION:........................................................20
3.4 METHODS OF DATA ANALYSIS...............................................................................................20
3.5. Time schedule and Budget break down..........................................................................................21
3.5.1. Budget break down.................................................................................................................21
3.5.2. Time budget.............................................................................................................................21
References.................................................................................................................................................22
iv
CHAPTER ONE
1. INTRODUCTION
(Abafita, 2003) argued that an innovative target designing and adequate screening
mechanism is a major task of those lending institutes to select the target poor
clients who can sustainably and efficiently utilize the loan for the intended
purpose only.
(Abafita, 2003) were discussed in his study that a limited access to institutionalized
financial service for the poor peoples in Ethiopia enforces the needy society to
borrow from Iddir, Iqub, friends and relatives and other informal lenders to finance
their business. As a result, an initiation to establish the formal financial sources
was in place to serve those poor peoples by discouraging the exorbitant effects of
those lenders. The main objectives of the MFIs as development organizations
were to serve the financial needs of the non-served and underserved poor peoples
who have the ability to work hard and change his/her life style due to the presence
of these financial services.
The microfinance institutions in Ethiopia were established legally under procla-
1
mations and provide their financial services to farmers and entrepreneurs who are
supposed to be engage in micro and small-scale businesses at urban and rural ar-
eas of the country (Abreham, 2011). As a result, a rapid growth in Microfinance
industry plays an indispensable role in addressing the millennium developmental
goals of the Government through delivering massive financial service schemes to
empower women, youths and other community groups.
In provision of this credits service to those who are in need of the financial services, MFIs
develops the credit provision policies which set the loan size, interest rates and repayment
schedules to be complied by those borrowers. Although microfinance institutions have a
mission of alleviating and or reducing poverty by improving the livelihood of the low-income
groups of the community through credit delivery they may face an obstacle in collecting the
outstanding loan amounts with its interest charges for the time period elapsed according to the
contractual agreements made between the lending institutions and the borrowers on the specific
dates.
Moreover, a rapidly growing in supply of micro-loans, the increasing competition in the micro-
markets, the increasing over- indebtedness among micro entrepreneurs and the current financial
crises increases the credit risks (i.e. the risk of failure of microfinance borrowers). Thus, it is a
crucial issue for the microfinance institutions to assess the problems of loan recovery to
improve the financial sustainability and profitability of their respective institutions by
maintaining a strong credit risk management system (Abdulfettah , 2013). The probability of
being creditworthy of the borrowers can be characterized by the willingness and ability of the
borrowers and the lending characteristics of the institutes. These factors might have significant
impacts on the repayment performance of the respective borrowers. In another word, the
repayment behavior of borrowers can be determined by their attitudes or willingness and ability
to repay the loan, which might be expressed as a choice between the two alternatives: either to
repay or commit defaults. Moreover, the existence of other internal and external factors that can
influence the repayment attitudes of borrowers can significantly affects the repayment recovery
rate of lending institutes at large. On the other hand, in reaching-out with the financial services
to the large number of poor peoples in the areas through delivering these financial services to
2
enhance their livelihood and improving their lifestyles, an increasing number of defaulters
probably could have a significant impact on the institution’s social as well as economic
objectives by retaining a large amount of outstanding loans. This could result in difficulties to
the lending institution’s capacity towards poverty eradication strategy as well as realizing their
financial sustainability due to the gradual diminishing loan repayment performances of
borrowers. Hence, the observed situations required the researcher to conduct a descriptive study
on identifying the major possible factors that can affect the repayment performance of ACSI as
the study area to resolve the problem of delinquencies faced by the lending institutions. The
study will be applied on Gondar City main branch. Those factors that have been identified as an
influential to explain repayment performances will be analyzed and discussed using the descriptive
analysis. The marginal effects of those significant variables in influencing the repayment status of
borrowers will be also discussed in the subsequent chapters of the paper.
(Abafita, 2003) argued that efficient characteristics of the lending institutes and other concerned
bodies while screening the target borrowers, effective attitudes of borrowers towards credit
service and socio-economic factor of the borrowers are among the factors that can influence the
repayment performances. Besides, although further study on the level of the relevancy of
collateralized loan on the non- performing loan were not conducted, it is believed that the
purpose of security is to reduce the risk of granting credit by increasing the chances of the
lender recovering the amounts that become due to the borrower.
Moreover, no further studies were conducted by the researchers to evaluate the importance of
credit monitoring activities to influence group members repayment performances. In addition to
this, evaluating the effectiveness of supervision and monitoring time intervals by the MF
practitioners to improve the gaps is another important issue to be assessed by the researcher so
that MFIs can improve their lending strategies to attempt better repayment recovery rate.
Therefore, identifying the institutional factors such as (credit term, supervision, collateral and
credit monitoring) that influences repayment performance is an essential issue of microfinances
in provision sustainable financial services. So, in our study we are going to narrow this gap on
the basis of taking a sample from the institution's employee.
4
1.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
1. What is the role of credit term on the loan repayment performance ACIS?
2. Does the organization require the relevancy of collateralized loan on the non-
performing loan?
3. What is the function of loan supervision in the repayment performance of borrowers?
4. What is the role of credit monitoring on loan default?
5
donations or subsidies in the long run. This requires an efficient loan repayment performance as
well as an impact to be observed on the target beneficiaries.
Although some studies have been conducted on the credit schemes that targeted the poor in
Ethiopia, no empirical study has been done on micro financing operation of Amahara credit and
saving institution (ACSI) so far. So, this study will be tries to provide a detailed empirical
analysis on the factors that affect the loan repayment performance of ACSI.
The finding of the study will have some important for the manager of Amahara credit and
saving institution in the assessment of loan granting procedures of the institution, for the
institutions policy maker, for the programmers, for other researchers who want to do on this area,
for governmental purpose, the credit worthiness of borrowers and other interesting parties about
the factors affecting performance of loan repayment in the institution and to suggest possible
solutions for the problem.
6
CHAPTETWO
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
The theoretical aspects of the literatures reviewed were focuses on the concepts of microfinance
services from the very beginning to today’s operations in the microfinance industries and the
importance of these microfinance services in poverty eradication and stabilization of high
unemployment rates at global as well as country wide level. Moreover, the concept of factor
affecting repayment performance were also reviewed and presented as follows.
(Hor Kimsay , &“Abdulfettah, 2011. [12 October 2016]. (2013), ) reported that microfinance
institutions were established originally as a non-for- profit making financial schemes that had
particularly serves the poor (low-income groups of the society) at rural areas. As it was reported
on this module, through time it was believed by some peoples in Cambodia that serving those
poor peoples as non-profit making institute has its own impact on the financial sustainability of
these MFIs to realize that the services would address a wide range of poor peoples in the country.
As aresult MFIs in the Cambodia has reviewed their credit scheme and tried to marginalize the
services by commercializing their credit schemes at lower interest rates than commercial banks.
7
The reason for transforming the MFIs service into commercial is to bring the transparency of the
financial services, increasing the confidence of donors and investors and to ensure that MFIs are
financially sustainable to serve wide range of poor societies which demands financial services.
Moreover, the author stated that the average loan sizes of MFIs were steadily increased from
time to time based on the repayment experience of borrowers. However, through periods an
increase in number of clients served and average loan sizes experiences some defaulted loans
over couple of few years that leads the microfinance practitioners to review their implementation
mechanisms and needs of new credit assessment methodologies that emphasizes on the micro
and small-scale Enterprises (MSE). The assessment was focused on the cash flow assessment of
borrowers rather than the collateral requirements which may fulfill the needs of MSE‟s. An
increase in the average loan size and change of loan approach to MSEs was the result of the
increased capacity of lending larger loan size by MFIs (Hor Kimsay , &“Abdulfettah, 2011. [12
October 2016]. (2013), )
(Alemayehu Y., (2008), ) argued that micro finances are considered as a chance for the poor peoples
to promote self-employment through credit and saving service delivery. Micro finances have
been established to support the low-income groups of societies by enabling them finance their
startup businesses and expansion of their low scaled income generating activities. Moreover,
people living in poverty, like in Ethiopia, need a wide range of financial services for
consumption smoothing, running their business and building assets. But due to collateral
8
requirement problems, poor people in most cases have no credit access from formal financial
institutes (Fikirte K. , (2011), )
The banking requirements of high collateral valued assets or material guarantee and intrinsic
banking procedures are among the most difficult cases that the poor cannot deal with. On the
other hand, the volume of loan demanded by small farmers/poor is not appealing to the bank
being there is an assumption that transactions are costly for small amount (Alemayehu Y.,
(2008), ). Furthermore, some theoretical frameworks also noted that unlike those microfinance
institutions, either government owned or private owned commercial banks are not willing to
serve the poor/low-income group peoples by providing small financial services due to the fact
that their requirements of collaterals. (Yunus, (1994),) .
In contrast, all microfinance institutions are intended to provide financial services in the absence
of any collateral values unlike the formal commercial banks by delivering various microfinance
schemes such as; micro credits, saving mobilization and provision of insurance schemes to the
poor. The major objectives of these microfinance services are to strengthening the economic
bases of the low-income generating activities of the poor peoples who are living in the rural and
urban areas of the country (Fikirte K. , (2011), ).
Group lending approaches creates better information on borrower’s efforts in settling the loan
obligations and have better monitoring advantages among the members than that of individual
9
borrowers. Members can get important information like reputation, indebtedness and asset
ownership of the loan applicants at a lower cost. They can also easily monitor individual efforts
made towards ensuring repayment. Moreover, group members appeared to be in a better position
to assess the reason for default and inform to the lending institutes for the shocking experience
exercised by the members which seems beyond their control (Abafita, 2003).
Individuals are supposed to select those whom they trust to form a group with; that is, they are
more interested to form group with those whom can make regular repayments and have a good
concern about the possible loss they face in case of non-repayments (Abafita, 2003). In most of
the cases, in group-lending approaches the functions of screening, monitoring and enforcement
of repayments are mainly endorsed to the group members than the lending institutes (Abafita,
2003). Furthermore, in addition to the above benefits from group-based lending approach,
commitment of the borrower to feel indebtedness to the obligation they entered into is an
exemplified character of borrowers for on-time loan repayment performances (Florence &
Daniel , (2014), ).
On the other hand, individual based lending approach is the other approach that loan contract
obligation is endorsed only to the single individual borrower. According to Reikne (Abafita,
2003), individual based lending approach may have better repayment performance than that of
the group lending approach. This is due to the possible existence of fragmented geographical
locations and high market share competitions among the group members which in turn affects
mutual indebtedness’s.
Besides, borrowers‟ characteristic that is the ability to repay the loan on- time can be determined
by: 1) the willingness of borrower to repay the loan, 2) capacity (how much debt a borrower can
handle) and 3) the cumulative capital (Assets) owned by the borrower. Before delivering credit
service, identifying and analyzing the characteristics of the borrowers is an important issue to be
considered by the credit managers to judge whether the borrowers exerts the lowest efforts to
honor the credit obligations (Florence & Daniel , (2014), ).
10
Repayment performance of borrowers can be affected due to various factors. An economic
theory suggests that a flexible repayment schedule set by the lending institutes can benefits
Borrowers and potentially enhances their capacity of repaying their debts. On the contrary, MFIs
practitioners believed that high repayment recovery rate can be realized through maintaining the
regular repayment time schedules (Abdulfettah , 2013).
(Florence & Daniel , (2014), ) lack of sufficient monitoring and reporting to ensure whether funds
are utilized for the intended purposes are another possible factor that determines repayment
coverage. Furthermore, the repayment rate improved as borrowers get closer to the loan limit,
which is the maximum available loan. In other words, motivation for reaching the maximum loan
level is positively associated to the repayment performance (Seyedmehrdad, Andrea, Giorgio,
Paolo & Emanuele , 2016).
Majority of the literatures on repayment performance of the borrowers have been focused on the
group-based lending or joint liability lending category of the credit schemes. Most of them have
revealed that a group-based loan is more effective in minimizing the default rate than that of the
individual based loan (Ghatak, 2000). (Mohd Sherif, 2012), borrower‟s inability and
unwillingness to repay the loan amount is considered as causes for high default rates.
11
default. Literature categorizes determinants of loan repayment performance. The following
paragraphs were discussed about determinants of nonperforming loans.
Credit term
The institutions credit term has an effect on the repayment performance. If there is a strong care
made a strong negotiation between the institution and their clients about the credit term the
institution faces a little loan default or non-performing loan. In his study (Abreham,
2004)conducted on the Oromia credit and saving share company evidence that non-performing
loans are determined by a credit term. And also, who studied in other financial sectors like
commercial bank of Ethiopia investigated that credit term is one of the determinants of
nonperforming loan. Besides other studies find out the borrower’s poor knowledge about credit
term as the cause for loan default (studies in commercial bank and other financial institutions of
Indian).
Collateral
It is something valuable which is pledged to the institution by the borrower to support the
borrower’s intention to repay the money advanced. Guaranty is taken to componset to the
institution’s risk at the time of loan default, and is considered as Secondary source of repayment
(MacDonald, K. , . (2003). ). The purpose of security is to reduce the risk of granting credit by
increasing the chances of the lender recovering the amounts that become due to the borrower.
Security increases the availability of credit and improves the terms on which credit is available.
The offer of security influences the lender’s decision whether or not to lend, and it also changes
the terms on which he is prepared to lend, typically by increasing the amount of the loan, by
extending the period for which the loan is granted and by lowering the interest rate. The reasons
why a security is needed by the institution are:
• To provide as a protection for the borrower’s deviation from normal course of action.
12
Credit Monitoring
Lending decision is made on sound credit risk analysis /appraisal and assessment of
creditworthiness of borrowers. But past records of satisfactory performance and integrity are no
guarantee future, though they serve as useful guide to project trend in performance. Loan granted
on the basis of sound analysis might go bad because of the borrower may not meet obligations
per the terms and conditions of the loan contract. It is for this reason that proper monitoring is
essential. Monitoring deals with the following vital aspects:
• Ensuring compliance with terms and conditions.
• Knowing the final use of approved funds.
• Assessing performance to check continued viability of operations.
• Detecting deviations from terms of decision.
• Making periodic assessment of the health of the loans and advances by nothing some of
the key indicators of performance that might include: profitability, activity level and
management of the unit and ensure that the assets created are effectively utilized for
productive purposes and are well maintained.
• Ensuring recovery of the installments of the principal and interest in case of term loan as
per the scheduled repayment program.
• Identify early warning signals, if any, and initiate remedial measures thereby averting
from possible default.
Loan Supervision
Supervision is the follow up of the institution for the borrower about that they are in the right
way operating their business or other determining operation for the provision of loan. There are
three major types of loan follow up. These are physical follow up, financial follow up and legal
follow up each discussed below.
Physical follow- up:
Physical follow-up helps to ensure existence and operation of the business, status of collateral
properties, correctness of declared financial data, quality of goods, conformity of financial data
with other records (such as taxes, register books), availability of raw materials, labor situation,
13
marketing difficulties observed, undue turnover of key operating personnel, change in
management set up among others.
(Zellar, Manfred , (1996), ) analyzed the determinants of repayment performance of credit groups in
Madagascar. His finding is groups with higher level of social cohesion have a better repayment
rate. Moreover, the programs that provide saving service to their members have a significantly
higher repayment rate. (Olagunju F.I. and Adeyemo R. , (2007)) also analyzed the determinants
of repayment decision among small holder farmers in southwestern Nigeria. The result showed
that the number of visits made by loan officers to the borrowers, higher level of education and
time of loan disbursement would have a better repayment performance. Moreover, borrowers
with lower number of household members would meet their repayment obligation better than
those with high number of household members. And having access to business related
information and providing training to the clients are increasing the loan repayment rate of the
borrowers.
As mentioned above, various studies were conducted on the determinants of loan repayment
performance in different countries. Most of these studies were focused on the credit associated
with agricultural activities and they identified the socio-economic factors that affect the loan
repayment rate of rural household. However, in the literature review nothing was indicated about
the factor influencing the loan repayment performance of urban borrowers. Thus, this research
could focus on the borrowers who made various types of business in urban area.
(Abafita, 2003)Analyzed the microfinance repayment performance of Oromia credit and saving
institution in Kuyu, Ethiopia. According to his finding; sex, loan size and number of dependents
are negatively related to loan repayment. On the other hand, age was found to be positive, while
age squared turned to be negative. Income from activities financed by loan, repayment period
suitability and loan supervision are positively and significantly related to loan repayment
performance. Moreover, loan diversion is significant and negatively related to loan repayment
rate. The negative sign implies that the use of diverted funds for non-income generating
purposes.
(Assefa B.A, . (2002) ) Employed alogit model to estimate the effects of hypothesized explanatory
variables on the repayment performance of rural women credit beneficiaries in Dire Dewa,
Ethiopia. Out of the twelve variables hypothesized to influence the loan repayment performance
of borrowers, six variables were found to be statistically significant. Some of these variables are
farm size, annual farm revenue, celebration of social ceremonies, loan diversion, group effect
and location of borrowers from lending institution. ( Abreham Gebeyehu ‘, (2002), ) Studied on
the loan repayment and its determinants in small-scale enterprise financing in Ethiopia around
Zeway area. The estimation result employingTobit model. He is found out other sources of
income, education, and work experience related economic activities before the loan are
enhancing loan repayment. While extended loan repayment period is influence the repayment
performance negatively. ( Reta, 2002) Employed probity model for loan repayment performance
of women fuel wood carriers in Addis Ababa. His finding is frequency of loan, suitability of
repayment period and other income sources are found to encourage repayment hence reduce the
probability of loan default. While educational level is negatively related to loan repayment.
16
Conceptual framework
The conceptual model for the study is to identifying and analyzing factors that can influence the
loan repayment performance of MFIs in Gondar city. In the literatures reviewed, various
empirical studies were focused on the probable factors that can determine repayment
performances. To carry on the empirical studies to investigate the probability of variables that
can affect repayment performance of borrowers, the study mainly focused on identifying and
assessing institutional characteristics(factors).
17
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3. INTRODUCTION
In chapter two the related literature of the study was observed. In this chapter we are going to see
research methodology. It comprises different sections; 3.1 research approach, 3.2 research
design, 3.3 population sampling and respondents of the study and 3.4 presents’ methods of data
analysis.
18
3.3 POPULATION SAMPLING
In this part the target population, sampling technique and sample size of the study would be
discussed.
Male Female
1 ACSI 18 10
2 Total 28
19
Purposive sampling
According to the institutions human resource management report the employees were employed
in to different position based on their activities such as management department (credit manager,
human resource manager, financial manager), service department, loan approval section (loan
officer or account officer), and auditing department. Apurposive sampling will be then used to
select representatives from each department and we will use sampling technique of
purposive/judgmental sampling technique to select all employees in credit management
department. Because the employees in credit management department are daily involved in
credit processing and we believe that they have better information about loan.
20
also qualitative data will be used to analyze through simple qualitative description about loan and
its determinants for the repayment performance of the institution.
21
CHAPTER FOUR
4.DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
In the previous chapter the research methodology containing sub topics such as research
approach, research design, population and sampling technique and methods of data collection
and analysis used in the study has been presented. In this chapter the results and analysis of the
data collected through a questionnaire is present. Respondent profile with regard to their work
place, position, experience in the institution and experience in the institution lending system
were presented at the end of the paper (in appendix).
22
Table 4.2 the role of collateralized on non-performing loan
Strongly agree Agree (%) Neutral (%) Disagree Strongly disagree
(%) (%) (%)
non collateralized
Collateral (also known as warranty) is the asset that borrowers pledged for the institution to
compensate the institution’s risk in the time of loan default (Sinkey, 2002), and it is considered
as a secondary source of repayment (MacDonald, 2003).
In the table 4.2 above we have observed that 53.33% of respondents were agreed that
collateralized loan is performed well in the institution. As a result, this study has got knowledge
that institutions are not granting loan without any collateral. Besides 40% of the respondents are
strongly agreed that collateralized loan is performed well in the institution and only 6.66% of the
23
population disagrees on that. The sampling result of this study shows 53.33% of the respondents
are strongly agreed that collateralized loan is help to protect loan from default. As a result, the
study reaches on an understanding that since the properties of the borrower’s such as home,
automobile and other furniture are behind them as collateral and become sold if they default to
repay the loan and have no any other way to repay the lender, they repay the loan with
compliance to the agreement. So collateral (warranty) is used to reduce the risk of granting a
loan by increasing the chance of the creditor recovering the amounts that become due to the
borrower. Moreover, 33.33%, 6.66% and 6.66% of the respondents are agree, neutral and
disagree respectively that collateralized loan helps to protect loan default and 53.33% of the
respondents are agree non collateralized loans are defaulted.
Based on the result of our sample in table 4.3, 51.4% of respondents are strongly agree that strict
monitoring is believable to ensure the institutions loan performance. In other ways the
24
respondents that agreed, neutral and disagreed that strict monitoring is believable to ensure the
institutions loan performance are 40%, 5.7% and 2.9% respectively.
From this the study has got a knowledge that if the institution monitors their borrower’s property
and give an attention for the borrower what are they have been doing by the money they borrow
from the institution and giving an announcements about the system how to utilize the money
they borrowed and give warning sign if they use the money for unintended purpose since the
borrowers are on the good performance to repay their loan.
The institutions have many possible alternatives to monitor the borrowers. Amongst this one of
the best methods is visiting to understand the progress of the borrower’s business operation and
giving an advice as necessarily important, and 48.6% the respondents agree that loan follow up is
also is a relevant factor for the occurrence of nonperforming loan. Moreover, 57.1% of the
respondents of the institution strongly agreed that though credit monitoring needs a higher effort
to ensure the repayment performance of loan. And also 34.3%, 2.9% and 5.7% of the
respondents are agreed, neutral and disagreed that credit monitoring needs a higher effort of the
institution to ensure loan repayment performance. From this the study gets knowledge that
effective monitoring of the borrower by the institution got a better repayment performance.
With growth in credit term comes 51.4 11.4 11.4 17.1 8.6
growth on loan default.
Borrowers default because they don’t 11.4 17.1 22.1 34.3 14.3
understand credit terms well.
25
Poorly negotiated credit terms lead to 51.4 25.7 8.6 5.7 8.6
loan non performance
In financial institutions credit term has a significant effect for the occurrence of nonperforming
loan (Abreham, 2002). In the table 4.4 above our sampling result indicates 54.3% of the
respondents are strongly agreed that credit term is significant to determine loan repayment
performance in the institution. And 51.4% of the respondents are strongly agreed that when the
credit term becomes growth the chance of loan default is highly increased. As a result, the study
got knowledge that credit term is one of the main determinants for the repayment performance of
the institution’s loan, and the credit term grows the chance of loan default becomes increase. On
the other hand, 11.4%, 11.4% 17.1% and8.6% of the respondents are agreed, neutral, disagreed
and strongly disagreed respectively that with the growth of credit term the chance of loan default
becomes increased. Besides, most of the respondents i.e. 34.3% are disagreed that borrowers
default to repay the loan is not related with the misunderstanding of credit term (this is in
different with the studies of Indian commercial banks and other financial institutions). This
entails that borrowers are clearly understand the credit term. Therefore, the Indian researchers
are better to see again about the client’s knowledge about credit term. On the assumption, poorly
negotiated credit term leads to loan nonperformance about 51.4% of the respondents are strongly
agreed. Accordingly, if the lenders have a good deal about the credit term for the borrowers, the
borrowers are in a better position to pay the debt.
26
Table 4.5 the significance of loan supervision on repayment
performance
Strongly Agree Neutral (%) Disagree (&) Strongly
agree (%) (%) disagree (%)
Loan supervision is the follow up of the institution about for what purpose and how the
borrowers are used the money they lend from the institution for the best utilization of money
provided as a loan.
From the tale 4.5 above it is observed that 57.1% of the respondents are agreed that the
institution is supervise the borrowers when the loan is going to granting. From this sampling
result the study got knowledge that the institution has supervision policy to grant a loan for the
creditworthy borrowers. In other ways, 31.4%, 5.7% and 5.7% of the respondents are strongly
agreed, neutral and disagreed respectively that the institution supervises the borrowers to grant a
loan. Moreover, 54.3% of the respondents are strongly agreed that a borrowers without any
supervision becomes defaulted for repayment and 51.4% of the respondents also strongly agreed
27
that the institutions with higher loan supervision faces a little non-performing loan. As a result,
the knowledge that the study got from this sample result is if the institution provides a great
supervision for the borrowers when they decide to grant loan they have a better performance for
the repayment of loan wisely.
As the respondents tell there are different challenges that face during the period of repayment.
Those are borrowers used the loan they get from the institution for unintended purposes such as
ceremony, wedding clothing and others. Due to this they cannot be profitable rather than being
the owner of much accrued debts and they cannot pay the loan properly based on the agreement.
And other difficulties that face during the repayment period are
Respondents say different things about the incentives made by their institutions for those
creditworthy borrowers. Some of these are:
CHAPTER FIVE
This study finds out collateral is one among the main requirements for assuring the lend-
ing institution’s repayment performance of loan provided for the clients. Due to this most
of the time financial institutions did not grant a loan without any collateral. When the in-
stitution has done so it is helpful to ensure the borrowers full commitment, provide as a
security if the borrowers are defaulted for repayment, protect the borrower’s deviation
from performing the planned action at the time of credit extension. Since bounding the
borrower with high valuable collateral make a feeling for them not to lose the property
due to defaulting to repay their loan. Therefore, borrowers become in a good position to
repay the debt.
The institution made a strong negotiation with the borrowers about the credit term since it
is one of the possible determinants for the repayment performance of loan. But the bor-
rower’s knowledge about the credit term is not the cause for loan default. So as the credit
term becomes long it is not the borrower’s poor knowledge about credit term rather it is
29
the negligence of the borrowers so, the institution is cautious when there is a growth of
credit term since it approaches to loan default.
In addition, the institution made a strict monitoring to ensure loan performance. The insti-
tution monitors the borrower’s property and gives an attention what the borrowers have
been made by the money they lend from the institution. The institutions have many possi-
ble alternatives to monitor the borrowers. Among this one of the best methods is visiting
to understand the progress of the borrower’s business operation and giving an advice as
necessarily important, and encouraging the repayment performance.
Besides, the institution made loan supervision about for what purpose the borrowers need
a loan, how they are going to use the loan and also their productiveness of using a loan.
Such supervisions are a key factor for the client’s better productivity and the assurance of
repayment performance of the institution since the borrower’s achievement is also great
for little occurrence of nonperforming loan in the institution.
Finally, the study investigates that even if there are some difficulties faced at the time of
loan repayment with the borrowers there is also an interesting condition with those credit
worthy borrowers who are really productive and achievable and the institution have an
incentive mechanism for such borrowers. Among the incentives some of them are pro-
vide a loan without collateral, granting a loan as the amount they want and at any time
they want, giving different awards, getting a trust by the institution and so on.
5.2 RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above the research findings and conclusion the following recommendation are
suggested.
30
etc.) of borrowers taking it as a collateral since it is used to assure the borrowers commit-
ment to pay the debt.
The institution is also advised to strengthen their attention on monitoring the borrowers
attentively as they have done before to make them productive by assessing the businesses
intended to operate by the loan which is provided.
In making the negotiation about the credit term the institution should not be shallow
rather it is expected to be strong. Because poorly negotiated credit term leads to the
growth of credit term even if the borrowers have knowledge about the credit term which
is the indicator of loan default as investigated in the analysis of the research.
Loan supervision is having a key role for the performance of the institution. This because
if the institution supervises the borrower it is easy to know what the borrower intends to
operate, and give an advice how to utilize the money they borrowed. By doing so since
the credit is invested on the outlined purpose the borrowers become achievable and there
will not be nonperforming. As a result, the institution is ought to strengthen their supervi-
sion system than what they have been made before at the time of deciding to provide a
loan for the borrowers.
Recommendation for Further Researchers:
As it had tried to mention in the scope and delimitation of the study in chapter one, this research
has its own strength and limitation in terms of its scope and methodology used. Therefore, we are
recommended that: -
There are different kinds of factors that affect loan repayment performance such as socio-
economic factors, loan related factors and institutional factors. However, this study is
mainly focused on institutional factors only
The sample respondents of the study are taken from the employees of the institution. This
due to provide as a knowledge gap expressed in the statement of the problem.
31
References
Abreham Gebeyehu ‘. ((2002), ). Loan repayment and its Determinants in Small-Scale Enterprises
Financing in Ethiopia: Case of private borrowers Around Zeway Area’, M. Sc. Thesis,. AAU.
Berhanu. ( 2001). argues that default problems destroy lending capacity as the flow of repayment
declines transferring lenders into welfare agencies, instead of a viable financial institution.
Mohammed Yunus and Grameen . ( 2016). an improvement in the economy and social welfare could
partly realized through delivering micro-credits to the poor people Microfinance and Micro-
credit.
Reta. (2002). Employed probity model for loan repayment performance of women fuel wood carriers in
Addis Ababa.
Abafita. (2003). Analyzed the microfinance repayment performance of Oromia credit and saving
institution in Kuyu, Ethiopia.
Abdulfettah . (2013). proved that microfinance service can be viewed as a developmental strategy
implementer that intended to empower poor women entrepreneurs to initiate their businesses.
Abreham. ( 2011). Microfinance Business Proclamation, Proclamation No. 626/2009. Federal Negarit
Gazeta published on 12th May 2009, Ethiopia.
Abreham. (2004).
Alemayehu Y. ( (2008), ). the performance of Microfinance Institutions in Ethiopia; Case of six MFIs, .
Ethiopia.
Armendariz de Aghion, B., & Murdoch, J. ( (2000), ). Microfinance beyond group lending. Economics of
Transition, 8(2), .
Assefa B.A. (. (2002) ). ‘Factors influencing loan repayment of rural women in Eastern Ethiopia: the case
of Dire Dawa Area’, A Thesis presented to the school of graduate studies, . Alemaya University,
Ethiopia.
32
Bayeh);, S.I., & Thakor, A.V. . ( (1995), (2012)). Financial sustainability of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs)
in Ethiopia; Vol. 4 Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. Greenbaum& Contemporary financial intermediation.
Forth Worth, Texas: . Dryden Press.
Belayneh . ( 2006). External factors such as the economic, political and business environment in which
the borrower operates are important determinants of loan repayment.
Berhanu . (2001). argues that default problems destroy lending capacity as the flow of repayment
declines transferring lenders into welfare agencies, instead of a viable financial institution.
Bhatt N. and Tang S. . ((2002) ‘). Determinants of Repayment in Microcredit: Evidence from Programs in
the United States’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,.
Ethiopia. (n.d.).
Fikirte K. . ((2011), ). „Determinants of loan repayment performance‟, a case study on Addis Credit and
Saving Institution, . Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Florence & Daniel . ((2014), ). Factors influencing loan repayment in Microfinance Institutions in Kenya,
Volume 16, . Kenya.
Ghatak. ( 2000). Most of them have revealed that a group-based loan is more effective in minimizing the
default rate than that of the individual based loan.
Ghatak, M. . ( (2000),). Screening by the company you keep: joint liability lending and the peer selection
effect. The Economic Journal, .
Ghatak, M. . ((1999), ). Group lending, local information and peer selection. Journal of Development
Economics, .
Hor Kimsay , &“Abdulfettah. (2011. [12 October 2016]. (2013), ). The Evolution of Microfinance”.
Available from the economics-today,“Credit Risk Management in Micro-Finance: the conceptual
framework.
Joseph, G. & Mertez, F. (2003). population is a group of items that a sample had been taken from.
33
MacDonald, K. . (. (2003). ). collateral is a secondary source of repayment.
Mohd Sherif. ( 2012). borrower‟s inability and unwillingness to repay the loan amount is considered as
causes for high default rates.
Olagunju F.I. and Adeyemo R. . ((2007)). Determinants of Repayment Decision among Small Holder
Farmers in Southwestern Nigeria’, Medwell Journals, Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences.
Reta Guddisa . ((2000), ). ‘Women and Micro Finance: The Case of Women Fuel Wood Carriers in Addis
Ababa’, M.Sc. Thesis, . AAU.
Seyedmehrdad, Andrea, Giorgio, Paolo & Emanuele . ( 2016). motivation for reaching the maximum loan
level is positively associated to the repayment performance.
Zellar, Manfred . ((1996), ). “Determinants of Repayment Performance in Credit Groups: The role of
Program Design, Intra-group Risk Pooling, and Social Cohesio.
Zeller M. . ((1996) ). ’Determinantes of Repayment Performance in Credit Groups: The role of Programe
desigh, Intra-group risk pooling, and social cohesipn in madagaskar’, Economic Development and
Cultural Change, .
34
UNIVERSITY OF GONDAR
APPENDIXE – 1
Personal profile of respondents
Male 10 66.66%
Female 5 33.33%
Total 15 100.00%
Position of respondents
Auditor 1 6.66%
35
Service department 6 40%
Cashier 1 6.66
Total 15 100.00%
Diploma 7 46.66%
Degree 8 53.33%
Master - -
Total 15 100.00%
18-30 9 60%
30-40 5 33.33%
40-50 1 6.66%
Total 15 100.00%
36
Years of experience in the institution
Total 15 100.00%
Total 15 100.00%
37
APPENDIX 2
UNIVERSITY OF GONDAR
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS & ECONOMICS
DEPARTEMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE
QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Respondent:
The purpose of this study is to asses and find out factors affecting non-performing loans in
Amhara credit and saving institution in Gondar town branch. To this end the study intends to
gather a relevant information from selected respondents i.e., employees of the institution in
different departments through a self-administered questionnaire. The participation is fully
voluntary and responses will be confidential. We would appreciate your favorable consideration
in completing the enclosed questionnaire.
38
4. Years of experience in the institution
A. Less than 1 years C. 5-10 years
B. Above 2-5 years D. Above 10 years
5. Years of experience in credit
A. Less than 1 years C. 5-10 years
B. 2-5 years D. Above 10 years
6. Your position in the institution
A. Credit manager
B. Loan officer
C. Auditor
D. service
39
2.A) Strict monitoring ensures loan per-
formance
Please indicate your degree of agreement or disagreement on loan supervision and the
loans default rate.
Agree Strongly Neutral Disagree Strongly Dis-
agree agree
40
1 A) The institution super-
vises the borrowers after loan
granting.
B) The institution supervises
the borrower before loan
granting
C) Loan supervision has a rel-
evant for the repayment per-
formance
D) A borrower without super-
vision becomes defaulted for
repayment.
21, please try to mention the difficulties that faces you during the time of loan repayments
............................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
22, what incentives is advantages are provided by the institution makes for those who are credit
worthy borrowers in order to motivate them and also others?
…........................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................
41
…........................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
42