1/4/22, 9:23 PM GLO-BUS Industry Center

Sample Peer Evaluation Form

You may not submit a peer evaluation at this time. This is for reference only.

Co-Manager Meetings

1. Attendance at co-managers' meetings

John Smith Amy Evans Max Jones
Habitually absent
Missed close to 50% of our meetings
Missed about 20-30% of our meetings
Missed about 10-20% of our meetings
Very dependable; missed only one or two meetings
Always present

2. Promptness
John Smith Amy Evans Max Jones
Habitually late
Late to about 50% of our meetings
Late to about 20-30% of our meeting
Late to about 10-20% of our meeting
Late to only one or two meetings
Never kept co-managers waiting

3. Caliber of preparation for meetings (was familiar with where things stood and latest results)
John Smith Amy Evans Max Jones
Always behind rest of the team
Marginal; usually had to catch up during meeting
Adequate; about as well prepared as others
Good; somewhat better prepared than others
Excellent; usually well prepared
Exceptional; generally best prepared of all co-managers

Effectiveness in Helping Run the Company

https://www.glo-bus.com/instructor-center/assignments/peer-evals 1/4
1/4/22, 9:23 PM GLO-BUS Industry Center

4. Understanding of company operations; skills in interpreting and analyzing the numbers on

the screens and in the company reports
John Smith Amy Evans Max Jones
Quite weak
Marginal; sub-par
Adequate
Good
Excellent; very impressive
Exceptional; strongest of all co-managers

5. Skills in diagnosing our company's problems, competitiveness, and standing vis-a-vis rivals
John Smith Amy Evans Max Jones
Quite weak
Marginal; sub-par
Adequate
Good
Excellent; very impressive
Exceptional; strongest of all co-managers

6. Skills in proposing "what to do" and strategic approaches to take

John Smith Amy Evans Max Jones
Quite weak
Marginal; sub-par
Adequate
Good
Excellent; very impressive
Exceptional; strongest of all co-managers

7. Caliber of contribution to decisions and to the company's overall performance

John Amy Max
Smith Evans Jones
Quite weak; had almost no impact (or took actions which hurt
performance)
Had little positive impact (or even a negative impact) in shaping
company performance
Adequate; played a supporting role in shaping company performance
Good; played an important positive role in shaping company
performance
Excellent; played a major and positive role in shaping company
performance
Exceptional; highest positive impact of all co-managers

https://www.glo-bus.com/instructor-center/assignments/peer-evals 2/4
1/4/22, 9:23 PM GLO-BUS Industry Center

Effectiveness as a Member of the Company's Management Team

8. Enthusiasm and commitment

John Smith Amy Evans Max Jones
Almost none
Inadequate
Adequate; acceptable
Good enthusiasm and commitment
Very enthusiastic and committed
Exceptional; strongest of all co-managers

9. Teamwork and cooperativeness - worked well with co-managers

John Smith Amy Evans Max Jones
Quite weak; gave team many problems
Marginal; prone to make decisions without telling anyone
Adequate
Good
Excellent; very impressive
Exceptional; strongest of all co-managers

10. Exercise of leadership within the group

John Amy Max
Smith Evans Jones
Had little to say and little to offer
Ineffective; had a hard time winning support for ideas
Adequate ability to present views and make a case for proposed
actions
Good ability to present views and make a case for proposed actions
Effective and persuasive in convincing others to go along with
proposed actions
Exceptional; the clear leader on our management team

11. Carried a fair share of the overall workload

John Smith Amy Evans Max Jones
Far less than a fair share
Slightly below a fair share
Roughly a fair share
Slightly above a fair share
Well above a fair share
Far beyond what any other co-manager did

https://www.glo-bus.com/instructor-center/assignments/peer-evals 3/4
1/4/22, 9:23 PM GLO-BUS Industry Center

12. Overall Evaluation

John Amy Max
Smith Evans Jones
Below
I would like to have fired this person as a co-manager
50
Very weak (I would definitely not want to be teamed with this
50-59
person again)
60-64 Marginal; sub-par
65-69 Slightly below-average
70-74 Average
75-79 Slightly above-average
80-84 Good
85-89 Very good
90-95 Excellent; very impressive
96-100 Exceptional; strongest of all co-managers

Additional Comments

John Smith
Provide any additional feedback here.

Amy Evans
Provide any additional feedback here.

Max Jones
Provide any additional feedback here.

Save Evaluations

https://www.glo-bus.com/instructor-center/assignments/peer-evals 4/4