New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by Perfect Domination

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.
com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Perfect 3
Domination 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 SYNOPSIS 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperPerfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a pair 10
S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is 11
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination if the following expressions, terms and 12
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination criteria holds. 13
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
TV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
IV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[IV (Vi ), IV (Vj )],
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )]}
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 14
SuperHyperNotions, namely a Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic Perfect 15
Domination. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for them, but research 16
has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are 17
well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented 18
throughout this research. To shine the light and importance of this research, a 19
comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic 20
SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, 21
so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to understand 22
the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the things that 23
are being researched to explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing research and 24
future research. It is a special case. Cells are viewed in the intended manner. There are 25
different types of them. Some are individual and some are well modeled by groups of 26
cells. All these types are officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but the relationships 27
between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and 28
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on 29
“Cancer Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense super-hypermodels open avenues for 30
research on theoretical aspects and “cancer diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific 31
research have been considered. It has also been formally collected in the form of several 32
questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of Perfect 33
Domination. Since there are more ways to get type results a Perfect Domination 34
becomes more understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic Perfect Domination, 35
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · [email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “Perfect Domination mastery”. 36
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 37
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a Perfect Domination. If 38
the specified table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and 39
hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is 40
redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of 41
SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 42
its vertices”, ”super edge values&max values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and 43
maximum values of its endpoints”. To get examples and structural examples, I would 44
like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Perfect 45
Domination. This is the original. Having the foundation of the previous definition in 46
the SuperHyperClass type would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all Perfect 47
Domination until Perfect Domination, then it is officially called “Perfect Domination”, 48
but otherwise, it is not Perfect Domination. There is some explanation for the original 49
definition titled “Perfect Domination”. These two examples are further explored and 50
distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary 51
methods based on a dominant Perfect Domination. Because of having Perfect 52
Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Perfect 53
Domination” and “neutrosophic Perfect Domination”. SuperHyperVertices and 54
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of 55
tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 56
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table exists. And if the 57
desired table exists, a Perfect Domination is redefined to a “Neutrosophic Perfect 58
Domination”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. 59
Since there are more ways to obtain Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- 60
Neutrosophic Perfect Domination becomes more understandable. Consider a 61
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of 62
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 63
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 64
”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 65
SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 66
SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 67
SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 68
elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 69
of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 70
SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 71
exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 72
SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 73
SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 74
and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, 75
and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no SuperHyperEdge in 76
common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 77
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 78
separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 79
among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 80
SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 81
designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 82
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 83
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 84
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 85
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 86
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 87
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 88
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 89
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 90
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 91
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 92
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 93
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 94
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 95
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 96
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 97
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 98
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 99
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 100
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 101
the longest Perfect Domination or the strongest Perfect Domination in those 102
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are presented for the longest 103
Perfect Domination called Perfect Domination and the strongest Perfect Domination 104
called Neutrosophic Perfect Domination. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible 105
SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at 106
least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of 107
any cycle, but literally, it is the transformation of any cycle. It literally transforms and 108
does not form. A basic introduction to the theory of Perfect Domination Neutrosophic, 109
SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 110
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperPerfect Domination, Cancer’s 111
Neutrosophic Recognition 112
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 113
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 114
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 115
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 116
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 117
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 118
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 119
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 120
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 121
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 122
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 123
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 124
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 125
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 126
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 127
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 128
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 129
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 130
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 131
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 132
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 133
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 134
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 135
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 136
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 137
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 138
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 139
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 140
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 141
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “Perfect 142
Domination”, in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle for direct 143
object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this scientific 144
research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for 145
background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. 146
The specific region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long 147
cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 148
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 149
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 150
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 151
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 152
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 153
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 154
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 155
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 156
Perfect Domination or Neutrosophic Perfect Domination for SuperHyperModels in it. 157
Some general results are presented. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible 158
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough 159
as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There 160
is no form of cycle, but it is literally a form of any cycle. It literally transforms and does 161
not form. 162
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 163
“Perfect Domination Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed cell or fixed group 164
of cells broadly, “Perfect Domination Rate” based on fixed groups or fixed cells. Groups 165
of groups of cells? 166
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 167
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 168
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 169
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “Perfect 170
Domination” and “neutrosophic Perfect Domination” over “superhypergraph” and 171
“neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research has taken more 172
motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find some connections among this 173
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain examples 174
and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific research. The general results 175
and some of the results about some of the connections are the ways that the key point 176
of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 177
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 178
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 179
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 180
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 181
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 182
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 183
new concepts, Perfect Domination and Neutrosophic Perfect Domination, are specified 184
in the sections “Perfect Domination” and “Neutrosophic Perfect Domination”. In the 185
concept of dealing with results and in Perfect Domination to create logic about the 186
continuation of the scientific research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and 187
Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their consequences, the 188
corresponding SuperHyperClasses are specified to summarize the work done in this 189
section, as “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 190
SuperHyperClasses”. Going back to the core concepts, clever steps towards common 191
concepts to extend new concepts in new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and 192
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on 193
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. There is the initial scientific research on 194
supergeneral relations and as the final and final part of the theoretical scientific research 195
is available in the section “General results”. Some general SuperHyperRelations are 196
fundamental and are known as fundamental SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” 197
were extracted and discussed. “Perfect Domination”, “Neutrosophic Perfect 198
Domination”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 199
SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what has been done about 200
SuperHyperNotions to make sense of the superiority of this scientific research and to 201
discover the word “best” as a description and adjective of this scientific research as 202
presented in the “Perfect Domination” section. The keyword of this scientific research 203
was presented in the section “Applications in cancer diagnosis” with two cases and 204
sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps towards SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” 205
and “Case 2: Incremental steps towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as SuperHyper. In the 206
“open issues” section, there is a detailed examination and recognition of what was done 207
in this scientific research and what happened in this scientific research in the form of 208
“questions” and “issues” in order to understand this scientific research in an outstanding 209
style, the advantages and limitations of this scientific research in addition to What has 210
been done in this scientific research is stated in the “conclusion and final remarks” 211
section. 212
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 213
Research On the Redeemed Ways 214
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 215
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 216
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 217
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 218
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 219
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 220
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 221
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 222
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 223
to Ref. [1]. 224
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 225
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 226
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 227
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 228
+
]− 0, 1 [. 229
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 230
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 231
2.5,p.2). 232
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 233
pair S = (V, E), where 234
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 235
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 236
1, 2, . . . , n); 237
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 238
V; 239
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 240
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 241
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 242
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 243
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 244
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 245
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 246
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 247
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 248
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 249
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 250
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 251
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 252
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 253
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 254
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 255
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 256
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 257
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 258
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 259
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 260
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 261
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 262
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 263
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 264
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 265
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 266
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 268
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 269
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 270
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 271
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 272
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 273
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 274
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 275
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 276
namely, E4 . 277
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 278
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 279
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 280
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 281
SuperHyperEdge. 282
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 283
SuperHyperEdge. 284
SuperHyperEdge. 286
SuperHyperEdge. 288
SuperHyperEdge. 290
SuperHyperEdge. 292
SuperHyperEdge. 294
SuperHyperEdge. 296
SuperHyperEdge. 298
SuperHyperEdge. 300
SuperHyperEdge. 302
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
SuperHyperEdge. 304
SuperHyperEdge. 306
SuperHyperEdge. 308
SuperHyperEdge. 310
SuperHyperEdge. 312
SuperHyperEdge. 314
SuperHyperEdge. 316
Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 317
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 318
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 319
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 320
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 321
characterized as follow-up items. 322
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 323
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 324





(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 325
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 326
HyperEdge; 327
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 328
SuperEdge; 329
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 330
SuperHyperEdge. 331
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 332
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 333
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 334
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 335
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 336
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 337
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 338
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 339
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 340
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 341
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 342
pair S = (V, E), where 343
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 344
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 345
1, 2, . . . , n); 346
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 347
V; 348
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 349
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 350
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 351
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 352
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 353
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 354
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 355
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 356
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 357
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 358
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 359
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 360
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 361
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 362
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 363
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 364
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 365
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 367
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 368
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 369
characterized as follow-up items. 370
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 371
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 372
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 373
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 374
HyperEdge; 375
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 376
SuperEdge; 377
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 378
SuperHyperEdge. 379
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 380
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 381
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 382
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 383
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 384
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 385
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 386
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 387
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 388
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 389
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 390
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 391
given SuperHyperEdges; 392
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 393
SuperHyperEdges; 394
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 395
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 396
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 397
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 398
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 399
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 400
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 401
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 402
common SuperVertex. 403
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 404
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 405
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 406
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 407
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 408
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 409
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 410
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 411
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 412
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 413
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 414
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 415
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 416
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 417
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 418
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 419
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 420
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 421
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 422
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 423
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 424
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 425
is up. 426
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 427
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 428
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 429
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 430
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 431
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 432
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 433
of following conditions hold: 434
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 435
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 436
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 437
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 438
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 439
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 440
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 441
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 442
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 443
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 444
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 445
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 446
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 447
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 448
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 449
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 450
SuperHyperPath . 451
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 452
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 454
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 455
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 456
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 457
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 458
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 459
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 460
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 461
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 462
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 463
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 464
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 465
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 466
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 467
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 469
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 470
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 472
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 473
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 474
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 475
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 476
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 477
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 478
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 479
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 480
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 481
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 482
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 483
understandable. 484
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 485
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 486
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 487
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 488
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 489
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 490
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 491
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 492

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 493
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 494
understandable. 495
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 496
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 497
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 498
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 499
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 500
Table (3) holds. 501
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 502
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 503
in every Neutrosophic items. 504
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 506
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the

Neutrosophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (4.2)
4 Main Resultant 513
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect 514
Domination). 515
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 516
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 517
SuperHyperPerfect Domination if the following expressions, terms and statements is called 518
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination criteria holds. 519
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S is a pair 520
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 521
SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 523
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). 524
Assume SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperPart {Vi }12 i=7 . Consider a 525
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1−12 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 526






Figure 36. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-








Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
SuperHyperPerfect Domination since the following expressions, terms and statements is 527
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination criteria holds. 528
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 }
= (3.12, 3.12, 3.12) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 }
= (3.12, 3.12, 3.12) =

V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 }
= (3.12, 3.12, 3.12) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 }
= (3.12, 3.12, 3.12) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 }
= (3.12, 3.12, 3.12) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−12 }
= (3.12, 3.12, 3.12) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
Assume SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperPart {Vi }12

i=7 . Consider a 567
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 568
V 0 = {Vi6=4 }({Vi6=1 }).
Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination since the following 569
expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect 570
Domination criteria holds. 571
X
|(
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=4 }({Vi6=1 })
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
T (Vi ), I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=4 }({Vi6=1 })
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=4 }({Vi6=1 })
= (2.86, 2.86, 2.86) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
V4 (V1 ) ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V 00 =

00
{Vi6=4 }({Vi6=1 }) :
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 572
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 573
SuperHyperCycle (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (15). 575
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 576
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34 i=8 . Consider a 577
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 }
= (8.84, 8.84, 8.84) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34

i=8 . Consider a 584
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 }
= (8.84, 8.84, 8.84) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 }
= (8.84, 8.84, 8.84) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 }
= (8.84, 8.84, 8.84) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 }
= (8.84, 8.84, 8.84) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 , ∃!Vi ∈ V 00 :
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1,3,17,22,27 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 613
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination criteria holds. Let a Neutrosophic 615
SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume SuperHyperExternal 616
{Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34 i=8 . Consider a Neutrosophic 617
SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1−34 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect 618
Domination since the following expressions, terms and statements is called 619
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination criteria holds. 620
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 }
= (8.84, 8.84, 8.84) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 }
= (8.84, 8.84, 8.84) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
5 Main Result 628
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 629
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite has the letter z. The notion on 630
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle don’t 631
coincide. 632
Proof. 633
(i). Let 634
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
635
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 636
There’s a new way to redefine as 637
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 638
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect 639
Domination. The latter is straightforward. 640
(ii). Let 641
P :
ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ ,
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
642
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect Domination taken from a connected Extreme 643
SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 644

Domination. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 647
SuperHyperPerfect Domination. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 648
SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination could be applied. 649
The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination proposes some longest 650
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 651
straightforward. 652
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set is as follows.
{V1Pi , V2Pi }, V3Pi , . . . , V|P

Pi
i|
. 653
Proof. Let 654
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
655
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.3. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a pair

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination number is as follows.
|Pi | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 661
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
662
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair 668
S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The 669
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set is as follows. 670
{
ViIN T ERN AL ,
IN T ERN AL
Vi+1 ,...
IN T ERN AL
V|E i|
Proof. Let 671
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
672
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination number is as follows.
|Ei | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 683
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
684
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Uniform 695
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle). 696
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every 697
pair of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 698
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 699
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called 700
Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite. 701
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 702
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 703
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 704
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 705
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 706
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set is as follows.
{V1Pi , V2Pi }, V3Pi , . . . , V|P

Pi
i|
. 707
Proof. Let 708
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
709
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.8. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination number is as follows.
|Pi | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 715
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
716
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair 722
S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set is as follows. 723
{
ViIN T ERN AL ,
IN T ERN AL
Vi+1 ,...
IN T ERN AL
V|E i|
Proof. Let 724
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
725
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination number is as follows.
|Ei | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 736
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
737
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Neutrosophic 748
SuperHyperCycle). 749
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). 750
Assume two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, 751
have the maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have 752
the same maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set. 753
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 754
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two have the 755
maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same 756
maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set. 757
Proof. 758
(i). Let 759
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
760
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 766
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
767
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 778
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 779
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 780
two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, is in every 781
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set. 782
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then every 783
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two is in every 784
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set. 785
Proof. 786
(i). Let 787
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
788
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 794
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
795
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 806
Neutrosophic Recognition 807
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 808
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 809
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 810
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 811
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 812
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 813
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 814
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 815
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 816
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 817
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 818
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 819
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 820
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 821
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 822
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 823
happened and what’s done. 824
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 825
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 826
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 827
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 828
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperPerfect Domination, SuperHyperStar, 829
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 830
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination or the Neutrosophic 831
SuperHyperPerfect Domination in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 832
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 833
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 834
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 835
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 836
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 837
featured. 838
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 839
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 840
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 841
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 842
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 44. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 843
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination. 844
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 845
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 846
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 847
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (44), the 848
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 849
Neutrosophic featured. 850
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (44) and the Table (23), the Neutrosophic 851
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 852
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 853
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 854
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 855
SuperHyperModel (44), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination. 856
9 Wondering Open Problems But As The 857
Directions To Forming The Motivations 858
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 859
The SuperHyperPerfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination are 860
defined on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 861
Question 9.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 862
recognitions? 863
Question 9.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperPerfect Domination 864
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination? 865
Question 9.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 866
compute them? 867
Question 9.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the SuperHyperPerfect 868
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination?

Domination 869
Problem 9.5. The SuperHyperPerfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect 870
do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on

Domination 871
SuperHyperPerfect Domination, are there else? 872
Problem 9.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 873
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 874
Problem 9.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 875
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 876
10 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 877
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 878
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 879
research are highlighted. 880
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 881
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the Perfect 882
Domination. For this reason, in the second definition, the original definition of the 883
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based on 884
the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new SuperHyperNotion, 885
Neutrosophic Perfect Domination, finds a suitable background to implement some 886
results on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the 887
subjects of this scientific research on modeling areas that are subject to cancer attacks 888
in order to recognize this disease as mentioned under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To 889
formalize the SuperHyperNotion, Perfect Domination, SuperHyperClasses and new 890
SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general results are summarized in 891
the Perfect Domination and Neutrosophic Perfect Domination sections. Clarifications, 892
examples, and literature reviews go all the way. In this scientific research, the literature 893
review has met the lines containing concepts and results. SuperHyperGraph and 894
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are super-hypermodels in “cancer diagnosis” and both 895
are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer has 896
occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 897
SuperHyperModel proposes SuperHyperNotions, formally called “Perfect Domination”, 898
based on the connections of Cancer’s movements in the longest and strongest styles with 899
the formation of design and architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The 900
“SuperHyper” prefix refers to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of 901
SuperHyperNotions. In the table (24), the advantages and ways of this scientific
Table 24. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. Perfect Domination
3. Neutrosophic Perfect Domination 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
902
research are specified, pointed out and expressed. 903
11 Background 904
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 905
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 906
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 907
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 908
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 909
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 910
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 911
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 912
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 913
with pages 32-55. 914
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 915
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 916
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 917
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 918
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 919
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 920
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 921
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 922
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 923
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 924
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 925
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 926
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 927
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 928
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 929
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 930
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 931
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 932
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 933
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 934
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 935
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 936
SuperHyperNumbers. 937
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 938
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 939
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 940
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 941
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 942
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 943
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 944
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 945
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 946
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 947
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 948
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 949
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by 950
Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super Initial EULA” in Ref. [5] by 951
Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 952
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental 953
SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic 954
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 955
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 956
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 60-88 and doi: 957
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 958
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graph by 959
Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super EULA-Path-Cut” in Ref. [6] by 960
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 964
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 965
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 102-124 and doi: 966
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124. The research article studies deeply with choosing 967
directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 968
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 969
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super 970
Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and 971
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [7] by 972
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 976
of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 977
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 978
242-263. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 979
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 980
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal 981
paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 982
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 983
hypergraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 984
approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 985
based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic 986
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 987
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 988
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 989
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 990
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 991
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 992
hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward 993
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 994
Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring 995
alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by 996
Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” 997
in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 998
of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 999
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 1000
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 1001
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 1002
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 1003
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 1004
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 1005
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1006
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 1007
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1008
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 1009
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 1010
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1011
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 1012
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 1013
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 1014
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 1015
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1016
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1017
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1018
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 1019
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by Henry 1020
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 1021
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 1022
Beyond ” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 1023
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 1024
in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1025
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1026
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1027
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1028
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett 1029
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1030
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1031
in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1032
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1033
Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1034
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1035
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1036
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1037
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1038
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1039
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1040
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1041
Treatments” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1042
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1043
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett 1044
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1045
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [230] by Henry 1046
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1047
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1048
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [231] by Henry Garrett 1049
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1050
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1051
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [232] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1052
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1053
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1054
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [233] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1055
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1056
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [236] by 1057
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1058
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1059
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [237] by Henry 1060
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1061
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1062
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [240] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1063
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1064
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [243] by Henry 1065
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1066
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1067
in Ref. [244] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1068
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1069
Ref. [245] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1070
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1071
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [246] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1072
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1073
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [247] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1074
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1075
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [248] by Henry Garrett 1076
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1077
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [259] by Henry 1078
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1079
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1080
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [260] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–260], there 1081
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1082
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1083
at [261–398]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1084
readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [399, 400]. 1085
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1086
proposed as book in Ref. [399] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1087
Scholar and has more than 5679 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1088
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1089
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1090
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1091
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1092
proposed as book in Ref. [400] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1093
Scholar and has more than 6667 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1094
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1095
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1096
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1097
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1098
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1099
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1100
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1101
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1102
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–260] 1103
alongside scientific research books at [261–398]. Two popular scientific research books 1104
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic 1105
science is on [399, 400]. 1106
References 1107
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1108
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1109
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (doi: 10.33140/CTMC.02.01.03). 1110
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1111
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1112
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1113
(2023) 35-47. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.01.05). 1114
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1115
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1116
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1117
(2023) 136-148. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.03.03). 1118
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1119
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1120
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1121
(2023) 221-307. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.06.04). 1122
5. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1123
SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super 1124
Initial EULA”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1125
Research 3(2) (2023) 60-88. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88). 1126
6. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1127
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1128
EULA-Path-Cut”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1129
Research 3(2) (2023) 102-124. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124). 1130
7. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1131
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1132
EULA-Path-Cut”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1133
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1134
8. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1135
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1136
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1137
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1138
9. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1139
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1140
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1141
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1142
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1143
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1144
10. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1145
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1146
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1147
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1148
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1149
11. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1150
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1151
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1152
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1153
12. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1154
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1155
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1156
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1157
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1158
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1159
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1160
14. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1161
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1162
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1163
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1164
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1165
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1166
15. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1167
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1168
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1169
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1170
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1171
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1172
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1173
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1174
17. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1175
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1176
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1177
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1178
18. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1179
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1180
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1181
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1182
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1183
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1184
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1185
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1187
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1188
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1189
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1190
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1191
22. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1192
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1193
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1195
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1199
24. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1200
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1201
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1202
25. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1203
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1204
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1205
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1206
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1207
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1208
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1209
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1210
27. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1211
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1212
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1213
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1214
28. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1215
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1216
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1217
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1218
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Star and Counteroffer Wheel By 1220
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1221
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10851065). 1222
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Bipartite and Counteroffer Path By 1224
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1225
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Multipartite and Counteroffer Cycle 1228
By Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super 1229
Gatherings”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10640905). 1230
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1232
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1233
10.13140/RG.2.2.17389.97769). 1234
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1236
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1237
10.13140/RG.2.2.28685.10727). 1238
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Strongly Resolving Sequence 1240
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1241
10.13140/RG.2.2.24994.20169). 1242
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1244
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10371529). 1245
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1247
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Dominating Sequence As 1250
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1251
10.5281/zenodo.10263440). 1252
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By STABLE As Hyper Decoration On 1254
Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10028600). 1255
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By STABLE As Hyper Decoration 1257
On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8310454). 1258
40. Henry Garrett, “Recognition of Cancer With Bipartite and Path as 1259
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By the Tool Called Stability”, Preprints 2023, 1260
2023081972 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1972.v1). 1261
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By STABLE As Hyper 1263
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1266
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1267
10.5281/zenodo.8206877). 1268
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1270
10.5281/zenodo.8206834). 1272
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1274
10.5281/zenodo.8206773). 1276
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1278
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1280
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1282
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1284
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1286
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1288
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1290
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1291
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1292
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1294
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1295
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1296
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1298
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1300
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1302
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1305
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1308
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1311
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1312
55. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1313
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1314
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1315
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1317
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1318
57. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1319
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1320
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1323
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1324
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1325
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1326
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1329
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1330
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1331
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1335
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1336
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1337
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1338
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1341
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1342
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1343
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1344
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1347
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1349
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1353
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1354
69. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1355
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1359
71. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1361
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1365
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1367
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1368
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1371
75. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1373
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1377
77. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1379
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1383
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1384
79. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1385
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1389
81. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1391
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1395
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1396
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1397
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1398
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1399
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1401
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1402
85. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1403
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1404
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1405
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1407
87. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1409
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1410
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1413
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1414
89. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1415
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1417
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1419
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1420
91. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1421
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1422
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1425
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1426
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1427
93. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1428
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1429
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1430
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1431
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1433
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1434
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1436
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1439
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1442
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1445
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1446
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1448
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1451
101. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1453
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1454
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1457
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1460
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1463
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1464
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1466
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1469
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1470
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1472
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1475
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1478
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1481
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1484
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1487
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1488
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1490
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1491
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1493
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1494
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1496
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1499
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1502
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1503
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1505
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1508
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1509
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1510
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1512
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1513
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1515
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1516
122. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1517
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1518
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1521
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1524
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1525
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1527
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1528
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1530
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1533
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1536
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1539
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1542
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1545
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1548
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1551
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1554
135. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1556
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1557
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1558
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1560
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1563
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1564
138. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1565
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1567
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1569
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1572
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1575
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1576
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1578
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1579
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1581
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1582
144. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1583
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1584
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1585
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1587
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1590
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1593
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1594
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1596
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1599
150. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1601
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1603
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1605
152. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1607
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1608
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1611
154. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1613
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1614
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1617
156. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1619
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1621
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1623
158. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1625
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1626
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1629
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1630
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1632
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1635
162. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1637
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1639
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1641
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1642
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1644
165. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1646
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1648
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1650
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1651
167. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1652
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1653
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1654
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1656
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1657
169. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1658
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1659
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1662
171. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1664
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1665
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1668
173. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1670
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1671
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1674
175. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1676
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1678
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1680
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1681
177. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1682
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1683
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1686
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1687
179. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1688
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1689
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1692
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1693
181. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1694
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1695
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1698
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1699
183. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1700
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1701
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1704
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1705
185. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1706
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1707
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1710
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1711
187. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1712
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1713
188. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1715
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1716
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1719
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1720
190. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1721
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1722
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1725
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1726
192. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1727
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1728
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1731
194. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1733
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1734
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1737
196. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1739
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1740
197. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1742
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1743
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1746
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1749
200. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1751
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1752
201. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1754
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1755
202. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1757
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1758
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1759
203. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1760
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1761
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1762
204. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1763
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1764
205. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1766
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1767
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1768
206. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1769
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1770
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1771
207. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1772
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1773
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1774
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1775
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1778
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1779
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1782
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1783
210. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1784
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1786
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1787
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1790
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1791
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1794
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1795
213. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1796
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1797
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1798
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1799
214. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1800
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1801
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1802
215. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1803
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1804
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1805
216. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1806
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1807
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1808
217. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1809
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1810
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1811
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1812
218. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1813
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1814
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1815
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1816
219. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1817
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1818
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1819
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1820
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1821
220. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1822
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1823
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1824
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1825
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1826
221. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1827
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1828
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1829
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1830
222. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1831
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1832
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1833
223. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1834
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1835
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1837
224. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1838
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1839
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1840
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1841
225. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1842
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1843
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1844
226. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1845
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1846
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1847
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1848
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1849
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1850
227. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1851
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1852
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1853
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1854
228. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1855
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1856
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1857
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1858
229. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1859
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1860
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1861
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1862
230. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1863
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1864
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1865
231. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1866
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1867
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1868
232. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1870
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1871
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1872
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1873
233. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1874
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1875
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1876
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1877
234. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1878
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1879
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1880
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1881
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1883
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1884
236. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1885
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1886
237. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1888
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1889
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1890
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1895
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1899
240. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1900
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1901
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1902
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1903
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1906
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1908
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1909
243. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1910
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1911
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1914
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1915
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1917
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1918
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1921
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1922
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1924
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1925
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1928
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1929
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1931
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1932
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1934
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1939
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1940
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1944
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1945
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1948
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1951
255. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1952
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1953
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1954
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1955
256. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1956
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1957
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1958
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1959
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1962
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1963
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1966
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1967
259. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1968
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1969
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1970
260. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1971
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1972
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1973
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1974
261. Henry Garrett, “Stable Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1975
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10523307). 1976
262. Henry Garrett, “Resolving Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1977
263. Henry Garrett, “Dominating Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1979
264. Henry Garrett, “Stable In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1981
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8210033). 1982
265. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1983
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8206898). 1984
266. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1985
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 1986
267. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 1987
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 1988
268. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1989
269. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1991
270. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1993
271. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1995
272. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1997
273. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1999
274. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2001
275. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2003
276. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2005
277. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2007
278. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2009
279. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2011
280. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2013
281. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2015
282. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2017
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 2018
283. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2019
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 2020
284. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2021
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 2022
285. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2023
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 2024
286. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2025
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 2026
287. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2027
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 2028
288. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2029
289. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2031
290. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2033
291. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2035
292. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2037
293. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2039
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 2040
294. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2041
295. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2043
296. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2045
297. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2047
298. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2049
299. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2051
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2052
300. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2053
301. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2055
302. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2057
303. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2059
304. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2061
305. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2063
306. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2065
307. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2067
308. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2069
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2070
309. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2071
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2072
310. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2073
311. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2075
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2076
312. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2077
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2078
313. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2079
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2080
314. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2081
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2082
315. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2083
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2084
316. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2085
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2086
317. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2087
318. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2089
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2090
319. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2091
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2092
320. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2093
321. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2095
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2096
322. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2097
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2098
323. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2099
324. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2101
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2102
325. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2103
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2104
326. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2105
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2106
327. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2107
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2108
328. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2109
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2110
329. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2111
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2112
330. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2113
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2114
331. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2115
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2116
332. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2117
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2118
333. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2119
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2120
334. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2121
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2122
335. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2123
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2124
336. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2125
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2126
337. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2127
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2128
338. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2129
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2130
339. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2131
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2132
340. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2133
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2134
341. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2135
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2136
342. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2137
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2138
343. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2139
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2140
344. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2141
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2142
345. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2143
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2144
346. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2145
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2146
347. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2147
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2148
348. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2149
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2150
349. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2151
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2152
350. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2153
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2154
351. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2155
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2156
352. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2157
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2158
353. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2159
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2160
354. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2161
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2162
355. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2163
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2164
356. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2165
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2166
357. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2167
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2168
358. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2169
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2170
359. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2171
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2172
360. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2173
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2174
361. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2175
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2176
362. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2177
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2178
363. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2179
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2180
364. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2181
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2182
365. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2183
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2184
366. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2185
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2186
367. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2187
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2188
368. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2189
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2190
369. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2191
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2192
370. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2193
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2194
371. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2195
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2196
372. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2197
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2198
373. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2199
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2200
374. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2201
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2202
375. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2203
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2204
376. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2205
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2206
377. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2207
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2208
378. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2209
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2210
379. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2211
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2212
380. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2213
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2214
381. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2215
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2216
382. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2217
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2218
383. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2219
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2220
384. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2221
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2222
385. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2223
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2224
386. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2225
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2226
387. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2227
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2228
388. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2229
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2230
389. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2231
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2232
390. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2233
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2234
391. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2235
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2236
392. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2237
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2238
393. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2239
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2240
394. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2241
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2242
395. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2243
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2244
396. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2245
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2246
397. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2247
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2248
398. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2249
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2250
399. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2251
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2252
400. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2253
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2254

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.

com · Manhattan, NY, USA

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Perfect 3

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperPerfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a pair 10

S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is 11

called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination if the following expressions, terms and 12

statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination criteria holds. 13

SuperHyperNotions, namely a Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic Perfect 15

has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are 17

well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented 18

comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic 20

SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, 21

so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to understand 22

between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and 28

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on 29

questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of Perfect 33

becomes more understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic Perfect Domination, 35

there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “Perfect Domination mastery”. 36

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 37

hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is 40

redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of 41

SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 42

like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Perfect 45

Domination until Perfect Domination, then it is officially called “Perfect Domination”, 48

distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary 51

methods based on a dominant Perfect Domination. Because of having Perfect 52

Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Perfect 53

Domination” and “neutrosophic Perfect Domination”. SuperHyperVertices and 54

SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of 55

tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 56

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table exists. And if the 57

desired table exists, a Perfect Domination is redefined to a “Neutrosophic Perfect 58

Domination”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. 59

Neutrosophic Perfect Domination becomes more understandable. Consider a 61

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of 62

Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 63

SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 64

”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 65

SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 66

SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 67

SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 68

elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 69

of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 70

SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 71

exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 72

SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 73

SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 74

common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 77

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 78

separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 79

among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 80

SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 81

designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 82

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 83

cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 86