1 s2.0 S2221169115302884 Main
1 s2.0 S2221169115302884 Main
1 s2.0 S2221169115302884 Main
net/publication/261615471
CITATIONS READS
163 4,513
2 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by Samuel F. Hayle-Eyesus on 08 May 2015.
Document heading doi:10.12980/APJTB.4.2014C807 襃 2014 by the Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. All rights reserved.
Peer reviewer Objective: To evaluate the concentration of bacteria and fungi in the indoor environment of
D r. P ravin M alla S hrestha, S enior Jimma University libraries, so as to estimate the health hazard and to create standards for indoor
Research fellow, University of air quality control.
Massachusetts. Methods: The microbial quality of indoor air of eight libraries of Jimma University was
Tel: 413-577-2747 determined. The settle plate method using open Petri-dishes containing different culture media
Fax: 413-545-1578 was employed to collect sample twice daily. Isolates were identified according to standard
E-mail: [email protected] methods.
Results: The concentrations of bacteria and fungi aerosols in the indoor environment of the
Comments university libraries ranged between 367-2595 CFU/m3. According to the sanitary standards
This study evaluated the indoor air classification of European Commission, almost all the libraries indoor air of Jimma University
quality of the eight different libraries was heavily contaminated with bacteria and fungi. In spite of their major source difference, the
through colony forming count method average fungi density found in the indoor air of libraries did appear to follow the same trend with
using both bacterial and fungal bacterial density (P=0.001). The bacteria isolates included Micrococcus sp., Staphylococcus aureus,
specific media. This is a simple and Streptococcus pyogenes, Bacillus sp. and Neisseria sp. while Cladosporium sp., Alternaria sp.,
conventional way of microbial air Penicillium sp. and Aspergillus sp. were the most isolated fungi.
quality assessment. Conclusions: The indoor air of all libraries were in the range above highly contaminated
Details on Page S316 according to European Commission classification and the most isolates are considered as potential
candidates involved in the establishment of sick building syndromes and often associated with
clinical manifestations like allergy, rhinitis, asthma and conjunctivitis. Thus, attention must
be given to control those environmental factors which favor the growth and multiplication of
microbes in indoor environment of libraries to safeguard the health of users and workers.
KEYWORDS
Indoor air, Open-plate technique, Microbiological assessment, Bacteria, Fungi, Sedimentation
technique
asthma development, asthma exacerbation, current asthma, Where N=microbial CFU/m of indoor air; a=number of
3
respiratory infections, upper respiratory tract symptoms, colonies per Petri dish; b=dish surface (cm2); t=exposure
cough, wheeze and dyspnoea[1]. time (min).
Thus microbiological air quality is an important criterion Then, identification of isolates was done according to
that must be taken into account when indoor workplaces standard methods[19,20].
are designed to provide a safe environment. This study
provides information on the current concentration of 2.3. Statistical analysis
microorganisms and describes bacterial and fungal loads
for different libraries of Jimma University. Moreover, co- SPSS Statistics 16.0
software was applied to determine the
existence of bacteria and fungi were established to see the likelihood of statistically significant differences between
impact of environmental factors on their multiplication and the concentrations of bacteria and fungi measured at
growth in the indoor air of the libraries. different sampling place as well as the linearity between
the concentrations of bacteria and fungi measured.
S ciences L ibrary, S ocial S cience L ibrary, T echnology Library at 90 min exposure, which is 2 595 CFU/m , while
3
Library, Education Library, Law Library and FBE Library. the lowest bacterial CFU/m air were recorded at 4:00 p.m.
3
The study was conducted between Aprils to May, 2013. in Ketofurdessa Technology Library at 30 min exposure
S314 Samuel Fekadu Hayleeyesus and Abayneh Melaku Manaye /Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2014; 4(Suppl 1): S312-S317
Table 1
Number of bacterial CFU/m air at different sampling time of day at different time of exposure.
3
Table 2
Number of fungi CFU/m air at different sampling time of day at different time of exposure.
3
which is 367 CFU/m (Table 1 and 3). The highest fungal CFU/
3
Table 3
m3 air has been recorded at 8:30 a.m. in Education Library The range of microbe’s distribution in Jimma University libraries.
at 90 min exposure, which is 1 992 CFU/m3, while the lowest N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
fungal CFU/m3 air were recorded at 4:00 p.m. in Health Bacteria CFU/m
3
48 367 2 595 1 476 582
Science Library at 30 min exposure, which is 524 CFU/m Fungal CFU/m
3 3
48 524 1 992 1 087 381
Table 4
Type of microorganism isolated from each Jimma University libraries.
Type of microorganisms Ketofurdessa Agriculture and Veterinary Health science Social Science Technology Education Law Library FBE Library
isolate Technology Library Medicine Library library Library Library Library
Bacteria
Micrococcus sp. + + + - + + + +
Staphylococcus aureus + - + + + - + +
Streptococcus pyogenes + + + + + + - -
Bacillus sp. - + + - + - - -
Neisseria sp. - - - - + - - +
Fungi
Cladosporium sp. + - + - + + + +
Alternaria sp. - + - - + + - +
Penicillium sp. - + + + + + + -
Aspergillus sp. - - + + - - + +
Table 5
Evaluation of air quality in the designated areas of the Jimma University libraries according to the sanitary standards for non-industrial premises[20].
Sampling Sites and time
Range of Ketofurdessa Agriculture
Group of Pollution Health science Social Science Technology Education
values Technology and Veterinary Law library FBE library
microbes degree library library library library
(CFU/m ) library Medicine library
3
8:30 a.m. 10 p.m. 8:30 a.m. 10 p.m. 8:30 a.m. 10 p.m. 8:30 a.m. 10 p.m. 8:30 a.m. 10 p.m. 8:30 a.m. 10 p.m. 8:30 a.m. 10 p.m. 8:30 a.m. 10 p.m.
Bacteria < 50 Very Low - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
50-100 Low - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
100-500 Intermediate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
500-2000 High √ √ √ √ - - √ √ - √ √ √ √ √ √ √
>2000 Very high - - - - √ √ - - √ - - - - - - -
Fungi < 25 Very Low - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
25-100 Low - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
100-500 Intermediate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
500-2000 High √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
>2000 Very high - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(√) In the range; (-) Not in the range
Samuel Fekadu Hayleeyesus and Abayneh Melaku Manaye /Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2014; 4(Suppl 1): S312-S317
S315
The scatter plots of bacteria versus fungi concentration, increase the shedding of bacteria and agitation of air.
shows positive linear associations (P=0.001) with regression S imilar studies revealed that, the presence of aerial
coefficient (R2=0.22, n=48) as presented in Figure 1. bacteria was associated to the presence of personnel into
2500 the air of the partially closed premises[7,12]. The structural
y=0.3047x+637.32
R2=0.2162
design and the low number of occupants per area might
2000
be responsible for low bacteria burden of Ketofurdessa
3
Fungi CFU/m
Figure 1. Scatter plots of fungal against bacteria concentration at libraries that of bacteria concentration. Although in some specific
of Jimma University. cases the values for fungi contamination were maintained
As can be seen in Table 4, the most isolated bacteria during occupancy, its total mean concentration slightly
were Micrococcus, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus, decreased as occupation progressed, suggesting that most
whereas to a lesser extent Bacillus and Neisseria were fungi species present in the air were not human-borne.
isolated. The most detected fungi were filamentous species S imilar observations by others are in agreement with
with aerial growth and fluffy, cotton-like appearance. these data[12,13,21]. It thus seems likely that the dampness
Determination of properties such as size, shape, hyphal situation of the building might create favorable condition
disposition and spore arrangement led to the results shown for the fungi contamination, which can be dispersed
in Table 4 on the most common fungi. through droplets during disturbing and then maintained
in aerial suspension. Hence, the most important means
for avoiding adverse health effects is the prevention (or
4. Discussion minimization) of persistent dampness and microbial growth
on interior surfaces and in building structures.
Microbiological quality assessment of indoor air study In spite of their major source difference, the average
is one of the most vital investigations to determine the fungi density found in the indoor air of libraries did appear
microbial indoor air pollution. T he information on the to follow the same trend with bacterial concentration.
indoor microbial concentrations of airborne bacteria and This can be explained by the fact that the existed indoor
fungi is necessary both to estimate the health hazard and air environmental factors of the libraries favor fungi and
to create standards for indoor air quality control. T he bacteria growth. As indicated in numerous studies, the
concentrations of bacterial and fungi aerosols in the indoor environmental factors especially dampness enhance
environment of Jimma University libraries, estimated with microbial growth and multiplication in the indoor
the use of the settle plate method, ranged between 367- atmosphere[2,16].
2 595 CFU/m . Thus, the microbial loads of the buildings were favored
3
The concentrations of bacteria measured in all libraries by the environmental conditions which enhance their
were significantly different to each other (P=0.000). These development. And also it was stated by WHO that dampness
can be mainly explained by the variation of density of situation has to be considered as the risk indicator for
occupant during sampling time as well as the variation health risks of biological contaminants of indoor air[1].
of ventilation conditions [2,16] . I n the H ealth S cience A quantitative interpretation of the results describing
Library, the highest CFU/m might be due to the number the air quality in the library is difficult due to the lack
3
of occupants during assessment relative to size of library of widely accepted normative and reference values.
which is around 13 times higher than the other libraries, Universally applicable standards defining an acceptable
whereas the lowest concentration were recorded at level of indoor air contamination with microorganisms
K etofurdessa T echnology L ibrary that had the lowest have not yet been established. Evaluation of the air quality
density (0.06 occupant/m2) than the others. These situations in the designated areas on the premises of the libraries
S316 Samuel Fekadu Hayleeyesus and Abayneh Melaku Manaye /Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2014; 4(Suppl 1): S312-S317
in Jimma University was based on the sanitary standards in Jimma University, so as to make them sufficient for the
for non-industrial premises formulated by the European current and future student population.
Commission in 1993[22]. According to this classification, the
air in the all libraries was in the range of highly or very Conflict of interest statement
highly contaminated with bacteria and fungi.
T he air in the K etofurdessa T echnology L ibrary, The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
A griculture and V eterinary M edicine L ibrary, S ocial
Science Library, Education Library, Law Library and FBE Acknowledgements
L ibrary showed a similar level of contamination with
bacteria. The other two, Health Science Library and the The authors are grateful to Jimma University for the
morning sample of T echnology L ibrary indicated high financial support, library staffs for providing access
bacterial contamination. The results of the research into to the sampling points as well as to the D epartment
the concentration of mould fungi on the premises of of E nvironmental H ealth S cience and T echnology for
the university library indicate that a high level of fungi providing lab facilities.
contamination was determined in all libraries.
This remark, coupled to the fact that more than 14 m Comments
3
improve the indoor air quality of all the libraries. One of [10] H uttunen K , R intala H , H irvonen MR , V epsäläinen A ,
the suggestions made by authors is to improve the room Hyvärinen A, Meklin T, et al. Indoor air particles and bioaersols
ventilation system. before and after renovation of moisture-damaged buildings:
the effect on biological activity and microbial flora. Environ Res
Peer review 2008; 107: 291-298.
This study evaluated the indoor air quality of the eight [11] K alogerakis N , P aschali D , L ekaditis V , P antidou A ,
different libraries through colony forming count method E leftheriadis K , L azaridis M . I ndoor air quality-bioaerosol
using both bacterial and fungal specific media. This is measurements in domestic and office premises. J Aerosol Sci
a simple and conventional way of microbial air quality 2005; 36: 751-761.
[3] Awad AH, Farag SA. An indoor bio-contaminants air quality. [16] Graudenz GS, Oliveira CH, Tribess A, Mendes C Jr, Latorre
Int J Environ Health Res 1999; 9: 313-319. MR, Kalil J. Association of air conditioning with respiratory
[4] Brochu P, Ducré-Robitaille JF, Brodeur J. Physiological daily symptoms in office workers in tropical climate. Indoor Air 2005;
inhalation rates for free-living individuals aged 1 month to 96 15: 62-66.
years, using data from doubly labeled water measurements: [17] Borrego S, Guiamet P, de Saravia SG, Batistini P, Garcia M, Lavin
a proposal for air quality criteria, standard calculations and P, et al. The quality of air at archives and the biodeterioration of
health risk assessment. Human Ecol Risk Assess 2006; 12: 675- photographs. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 2010; 64: 139-145.
701. [18] G utarowska B . M etabolic activity of moulds as a factor of
[5] Hospodsky D, Qian J, Nazaroff WW, Yamamoto N, Bibby K, building materials Biodegradation. Pol J Microbiol 2010; 59:
R ismani- Y azdi H , et al. H uman occupancy as a source of 119-124.
indoor airborne bacteria. PLoS One 2012; doi: 10.1371/journal. [19] C heesbrough M . Medical laboratory manual for tropical
pone.0034867. countries. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: University Press Cambridge;
[6] Qian J, Hospodsky D, Yamamoto N, Nazaroff WW, Peccia J. 1991, p. 508-511.
Size-resolved emission rates of airborne bacteria and fungi in [20] Rajash B, Rattan LI. Essential of medical microbiology. 4th ed.
an occupied classroom. Indoor Air 2012; 22: 339-351. New Delhi: Jayppe Brothers Medical Publishers; 2008, p. 415-
[7] Meadow JF, Altrichter AE, Kembel SW, Kline J, Mhuireach G, 439.
Moriyama M, et al. Indoor airborne bacterial communities are [21] Ingold CT. Fungal spores: their liberation and dispersal. Oxford,
influenced by ventilation, occupancy, and outdoor air source. UK: Clarendon Press; 1971.
Indoor Air 2014; 24(1): 41-48. [22] Commission of the European Communities. Indoor air quality
[8] Bonetta S, Bonetta S, Mosso S, Sampo S, Carraro E. Assessment and its impact on man. Report No. 12. Biological particles in
of microbiological indoor air quality in an Italian office building indoor environments. Luxembourg: Commission of the European
equipped with an HVAC system. Environ Monit Assess 2010; 161: Communities; 1993.
473-483. [23] Schwab CJ, Straus DC. The roles of Penicillium and Aspergillus
[9] M andal J , B randl H . B ioaerosols in indoor environment-a in sick building syndrome. Adv Appl Microbiol 2004; 55: 215-238.
review with special reference to residential and occupational [24] Jones AP. Indoor air quality and health. Atmos Environ 1999; 33:
locations. Open Environ Biol Monit J 2011; 4: 83-96. 4535-4564.