Week 3 - Functions
Week 3 - Functions
Section…………………………………………………………………………………………….Page
Bibliography ………………………………………………………………………………………14
Given two sets and , a function is a rule of correspondence from set to set which assigns each
element of set exactly one element in set .
The set of inputs is called the domain and the set of outputs is called the range.
Names of Functions
There are several names that can be given to functions such as but the most commonly
used name is
Example
The following is an example of a function
( )
Where,
With functions, two elements from set can be assigned to only one element in set but one element
from set A cannot be assigned to two elements of set .
Example
Find the range (outputs) of the following values using the function ( )
( )
Solution
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )
Using the immediate previous example, for the function ( ) , we had each element of
( )
assigned to
( )
* + * +
The other way of writing the above function is .
Suppose now that and , this and the above may as well be written as
( )
Note: here, is strictly for inverse image of and not in any way standing for the inverse function
of because there are some conditions (not applicable to the case in this section) necessary
before we conclude that the function has an inverse function.
Example
For a function defined by ( ) , find the following images given that * + and
* +
i) ( )
ii) ( )
iii) ( ) ( )
Solutions
i) ( ) * ( ) | +
* ( ) ( ) ( )+ * +
ii) ( ) * ( ) | + * (* + * +)+ * (* +)+
* ( ) ( )+ * +
iii) ( ) ( ) * ( ) | +
{* ( ) ( ) ( )+ * ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )+} {* + * +} * +
For a function defined by ( ) , find the following inverse images given that
* + and * +
i) ( )
ii) ( ( ))
Solutions
i) ( ) * | ( ) + * | ( ) ( ) ( ) +
* | + * √ √ +
ii) ( ( )) (* ( ) | +) (* ( ) ( ) ( )+) (* +)
{ | ( ) * +} * | + { √ √ √ }
* +
Theorem:
When we have as subsets of and as subsets of Y, for , then,
i. ( ) ( );
ii. ( ) ( ) ( );
iii. ( ) ( ) ( );
iv. Generally, ( ) ( );
v. ( ) ( );
vi. ( ) ( ) ( );
vii. ( ) ( ) ( );
viii. ( ) ( );
ix. ( ( ));
x. ( ( )) .
i) ( ) ( );
ii) ( ) ( ) ( );
Solutions
i) If we have any ( ), it means there exists such that ( ). And since
it means , hence, ( ) ( ) because .
First, ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ),
or ,
or ( ) ( ) or ( ) ( ),
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
And second, ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
+ ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
Injective Functions
This means two different elements of the domain can never be assigned to one same element in the co-
domain. It is the same case even for more than two elements of the domain. In other words, injective
functions are called one-to-one functions.
Example
Solution
, ( ) ( )
Surjective Functions
Given the function ; when for all we have such that ( ) , then the function
is surjective. Graphically, this is illustrated as
Example
Solution
,
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
Bijective Functions
There is a perfect one-to-one correspondence among elements of the sets. In other words, each element
of the domain is assigned to exactly one element (for itself alone) of the range and no element of the
range is left out in being assigned an element of the domain.
Example
Solution
Since we have already shown in the examples above that the same function is both injective and
surjective, the function is bijective.
Composite Functions
What actually happens is that, for , we assign an element of set to ( ) an element in set
. And for , knowing that ( ) , we will assign ( ) an element of set to ( ( )) an
element of . Since ( )( ) ( ( )), we can conclude that we have defined a new function
called the composite function of and directly assigning elements of set to elements
of set . Graphically, this is shown as
( )( ) ( ( )) ( )
( )( ) ( ( )) ( )
( )( ) ( ( )) ( )
Examples
Given the functions defined by ( ) and defined by ( ) .
Find
i) ( )( )
ii) ( )( )
Solutions
i) ( )( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ) ( )
ii) ( )( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( )
Theorem
For , the function is bijective if and only if its inverse function, , exists.
Therefore, sometimes it is alright to conclude that the inverse of the function exists if we can prove
that is bijective because if is surjective, then came from some and also if is injective,
then came from exactly one . This leads us to another definition of an inverse function as
follows,
( ) ( )
Example
Given the function defined by ( ) .
Solution
We first begin by proving if is injective:
, we have ( ) ( ) . Hence,
we have shown that is injective.
Having proved that is injective and surjective, we can then conclude that is bijective. Hence,
exists and we give it as
( ) √
Daepp U., Gorkin P.(2003). Reading, Writing and Proving: A Closer Look at
Mathematics. Springer- Verlag New York, Inc.