EXPORT PROSPECTS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH:

INDIA' Author: Surendra J. Patel (1959)

FOOD,domestic finance and foreign trade seem to have operated as the

unholy trinity thwarting India's efforts to initiate a process of sustained
economic growth. The subjects have been examined by numerous expert
bodies and often appeared almost solved. But, invariably, the respite so
eagerly looked for was only temporary and these ugly problems always
reappeared, sometimes in more menacing forms, stressing the need for a
re-examination all over again. The recent foreign-exchange crisis is a
strikingillustration of this phenomenon.
During the last two years, imports have been running at a level 40-50%
higher than in the years preceding the start of the first five-year plan.
Export earnings, on the other hand, have remained stubbornly unchanged,
showing a marked decline during the first half of 1958. At present they
cover no more than about two-thirds of the imports, in contrast to 90% or
more between 1950 and 1956. This obstinacy of the export trade, rather
ungracious to the efforts that India has invested in export promotion, may
well continue, as this paper suggests, over the years to come. The import
needs, on the other hand, are increasing. Perhaps more important still, the
burden of repayment of capital and interest on foreign loans, now amounting
to less than 2% of the export earnings, is expected by the Planning Com-
mission to rise during the 'sixties to nearly a fourth of the present export
proceeds. There is thus a need for re-appraising the export performance
over the last few decades and seeing whether this provides any background
for viewing the export prospects for the years to come. This paper is an
attempt in this direction. The past experience is reviewed in Section I,
whereas Sections II and III are devoted to outlining the perspectives and
their implications for economic growth.
The exports from India accounted for 1-Ij% of the world trade in post-
war years. As in some of the very large countries of the world, such as the
United States, the Soviet Union and China, foreign trade in India on the
whole touches a relatively small, though a very important, part of domestic
economic activities. The total value of India's exports amounts to no
more than 6-7% of the national income. Although exports account for
such a small share of the national income, they play a very strategic role in
the Indian economy. They provide the means-foreign-exchange earnings
-with which the pressing import needs can be financed.
1 The author is a member of the Secretariat of the United Nations Economic Commission for
Europe at Geneva. The views expressed herein, however, are his personal views and should not be
interpreted as those of the Organisation.

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
 ANDECONOMIC
SEPT.1959] EXPORTPROSPECTS GROWTH:INDIA 491

I. LONG-TERM
TRENDS
Stagnationin Exports
The developments that have taken place in the foreign trade of India
over the last quarter of a century are shown in Tables I, II and III. These

TABLE I
in theForeignTradeof India
Developments
Index numbers,1953 = 100

Averageof the years:

1929. 1955. 1956. 1957.
1937-39. 1946-50. 1951-55.
1. India
Volume
Exports . 169 162 103 102 115 110 119
Imports . . 148 131 115 118 125 147 168
Unit value
Exports . . 37 24 87 114 98 102 102
Imports . 35 25 81 102 95 99 107
Termsof trade . . 106 96 108 112 103 103 95
2. Volumeof exports
World exports . . - 71* 77t 102 114 124 131
Burma,Ceylon,India,
Pakistan: exports .- 118* 93t 102 111 110 110

Source: United Nations,Statisticalrearbooks, 1953 and 1955,and MonthlyBulletinof Statistics.

NVote:The indicesshouldbe used only as approximationsin view of the very seriouschangesin
the geographicalcoverage,compositionof tradeand methodsof calculationoversucha long period.
Data for 1937-38 refer to present territoriesof both India and Pakistan,and 1929 data include
Burmaalso.
* 1937-38 only. t 1948-50 only.

changes, however, have to be interpreted with a great deal of caution, since

very important territorial changes,' affecting significantly the needs of
imports and availabilities for exports, have taken place in this period. The
indices of volume and unit value of exports and imports (see Table I) are at
best very poor reflectors of these changes. Bearing these qualifications in
mind, several broad observationscan be made.
(a) It is striking that the volume of exports has declined sharply over the
last three decades, whereas the volume of imports has changed much less.
A proper comparison with 1929, of course, requires adding the present
volume of exports and imports of Burma and Pakistan and subtracting the
trade among the three countries. A rough-and-ready adjustment in this
direction suggests that the volume of exports from these three countries in
the last quinquennium is still a seventh lower than in 1929; the volume of
imports, on the other hand, would seem to be higher by about a seventh.
1 The regionsnow constitutingBurmaand Pakistanwere separatedfrom the sub-continentof
India duringthe 'thirtiesand 'forties,respectively.

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
492 THE ECONOMIC JOURNAL [SEPT.

The quantum of world exports has increased by more than two-thirdsin the
course of the last two decades, but the combined volume of exports from
Burma, Ceylon, India and Pakistanis now actually lower by a tenth.' Thus,
the vast expansion in world trade over the last three decades has simply
by-passed the Indian sub-continent.
(b) These developments were reflected in strains on balance of payments
in recent years. Instead of the export surpluses, common in the pre-war
period, there are now continuous import surpluses. The long-term de-
velopments have thus created a basic imbalance ,between exports and im-
ports, a situation which efforts at export promotion and continued import
restrictionsin post-war years have failed to alter significantly.
(c) In the development of this imbalance, the changes in terms of trade
do not seem to have played a major role (except during the 'thirties). The
favourable change in the terms of trade in the early post-war years has
disappeared,with the terms of trade now falling to the 1937-38 level.

Directionof Exports
The historical trend in the decline of the volume of exports assumesgreat
significancewhen the data on the direction of foreign trade are related to it
(see Tables II and III). In general, the changes in the direction of India's
foreign trade have remained minor over the last few decades. It is true that
the proportionof exportsgoing to the United Kingdom has increasedslightly;
in contrast, there was a sharp decline in exportsgoing to continental western
Europe, particularly Germany. Trade with the dollar area is now some-
what higher, whereas the share of Japan remains far below that in 1928.
Broadly speaking, the private-enterpriseindustrialised countries have
continued to account for over 70% of India's exports. This, when read with
the changes in the volume of trade pointed out in (a) above, suggests that
the industrialised countries have increased the volume of their exports to
India but have reduced the volume of their imports from India.
The share of the other pre-industrial countries in India's exports rose
very sharplyin the early post-war years when the exportsfrom the European
countrieshad not fully recovered. Since then, the proportionhas continued
to decline, it now being a little higher than in the late 'twenties.
So far, the centrally planned economies do not account for a significant
proportion of exports from India, although their share has increased very
rapidly in the last two to three years.
As can be seen from Table III, the value of imports from all primary-
producing countriesinto western Europe, the United States and Canada has
nearly trebled between 1928 and 1956. Their imports from India, Pakistan,
Burma and Ceylon, however, have increased very slightly. Since prices
1 The decline would be obviously much greater if trade among these four countries and exports
of cotton textiles to other countries (which were previously used within the sub-continent) are
excluded.

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1959] EXPORT PROSPECTS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: INDIA 493

during this period have risen considerably, it is obvious that the volume of
imports from these countries into the industrialisedcountries, India's tradi-
tional trade partners, has fallen markedly. The stagnation of India's ex-
ports is thus not due to the fact that India was dealing with trade partners
whose imports were stationary or declining. Indian exports have simply
failed to share in an otherwise expanding market.

TABLE II
TheDirectionof Exportsfrom India*
Destination. 1928* 1938* 1950 1956

Value in millions of current U.S. dollars.

Total exports 1,250 1 617 1 1,172 1 1,251
of which to Share in % of total.
industrialisedcountries
1. Private-enterprise . 77 75 62 71
United Kingdom . . . . 22 34 22 31
Western Germany . . . . lot 5t 2t 2
Other western Europe . . . 18 13 8 9
Australia, New Zealand and Union of
South Africa . . . . 3 3 6 5
Dollar area . . . . 14 11 23 19
Japan . . . . . . 10 9 1 5
2. Centrallyplannedeconomies . . . 2 3 1 6
China. . . . . . 2 1 1
Eastern Europe and U.S.S.R. . . _ 2 1 5
3. Otherpre-industrialcountries . . . 21 22 37 24
Rest of the sterling area . . . 10 15 27 16
Middle East . . . . . ... 3 4 6

Sources: League of Nations, Networkof World Trade (1942); United Nations, Directionof Inter-
national Trade (1953, 1955 and June 1957).
* Pre-war data refer to India, Pakistan and Burma for 1928, and to India and Pakistan for 1938.
t Whole of Germany.

The stagnation in the exports from India is associated with a funda-

mental shift that has taken place in the import demand of the industrial
countries.' Throughout the nineteenth century and the first quarter of the
twentieth century, agricultural products accounted for over 90% of the
imports into the industrialcountriesfrom the primaryproducers. In recent
decades, however,these commoditiesare giving way to petroleumand mineral
products, the exports of which now account for nearly two-fifthsof the total
exports from the primary producers to industrial countries. Among the
agricultural exports, the decline was much sharper for raw materials than
for food products.
This has acted very unfavourably on the exports from many countries.
Thus, for instance, the combined current value of exports from Burma,
India, Pakistan, Ceylon, Indonesia and Indo-China in Asia, Egypt in Africa
1 For a detailed discussion, see United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Economic
Surveyof Europein 1957 (Geneva, 1958), Chapters IV and V. This and the next paragraph are a
broad summary of the findings in this study.

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
494 THE ECONOMIC JOURNAL (SEPT.

TABLE III
from India,Pakistan,BurmaandCeylon
ImportsintoIndustrialCountries
Imports from Imports from India,
etc., as a share of
Destination. imports from all
All primary India, Pakistan, primary producers,
producers. Burma and Ceylon.

Billion U.S. dollars at current prices.

Western Europe 1928 4-5 070 15-6
1937-38 39 047 12'1
1952 102 073 7-2
1956 12-2 079 6'5
United States and 1928 2-o 020 10.1
Canada 1937-38 1-4 0.11 8*2
1952 60 034 5.7
1956 6'5 031 4.7
Total western Europe, 1928 6'5 0.91 14*0
United States and 1937-38 5-3 059 11*2
Canada 1952 16-2 1*07 6'6
1956 18-8 1 11 5.9

Source: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, EconomicSurveyof Europein 1957,
Chapter IV, p. 18, and Appendix Table IX. The figures are based on the statistics of the import-
ing countries and are therefore not strictly comparable with those in Table I.

and Argentine in Latin America in 1956 was about the same as in 1928,
although the current value of world as well as primary producers' exports
increased two and a half times during this period. In 1928 these areas
constituted nearly half the population of primary producing countries and
accounted for slightly less than half the exports of the primary producers.
As a result of the sharp structural shift in the import demand of the in-
dustrial countries, however, the share of these primary producers has now
shrunk to only a sixth of the total exports from the primary producers.

Commodity Composition of Exports

This structuralshift in the import demand of the industrialised countries
in the west, India's traditional trade partners, is illustrated by the per-
formanceof the commodities that predominatein India's export trade. The
level of exports of a country is influenced by several factors, such as the
changes in demand (external as well as internal) and the adaptability of
output to these changes. An analysis of the developments in the demand
and supply of the major export items that figure in India's foreign trade is
thus essential for a proper understanding of the stagnation in the overall
volume of exports.
Agricultural commodities, whether in a raw form as tea, tobacco, spices,
etc., or in a more elaborate form as cotton and jute textiles and vegetable
oils, form the bulk of India's exports, accounting for nearly three-fourthsof
the total. Thus, for instance, jute manufacturesmake up nearly a fourth,
tea a fifth and cotton textiles a tenth of the total (the three together are
responsible for half of the total); another quarter is added by nuts and

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1959] EXPORT PROSPECTS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: INDIA 495

vegetable oils, spices, tobacco, fruits and vegetables, gums and resins, and
hides, skins and leather. Non-metallic minerals and metal ores (mainly
mica, iron ore and manganese) account for only 3-5%. The factors in-
fluencing the exports of some of the major items are examined below.
Jute andManufactures.The data on changes in world demand and output
over the last half a century are summarisedin the table below:
In thousand tons (annual averages)
1900-9. 1910-19. 1920-29. 1930-39. 1940-49. 1950-54.
World consumption . . . 1,300 1,527 1,681 1,711 1,469 1,789
of which: United States. . 266 314 383 323 293 302
Others . . . 1,034 1,213 1,298 1,388 1,176 1,487
Output (India plus Pakistan) . 1,312 1,556 1,522 1,499 1,420 1,684
Source: FAO, 7ute, CommoditySeriesNo. 28, pp. 52-3, 63-4.

On the whole, the world consumptionofjute has expanded but little over
the last five decades; while weather may have played some part in restricting
the output of raw jute in certain years, it is clear that the major reason for
this stagnationis the limited world demand rather than the ability to expand
output. The peak output in the years 1912-14 (First World War), 1939 and
1940 (Second World War) and 1951 and 1952 (Korean conflict) was nearly
equal in all these instances-illustrating that a rise in demand could induce
sizeable increases in output. In the more recent period, the output in the
two years 1951 and 1952 was some 40% above that in the preceding as well
as the following three years.
Tea. Next in importance is tea. As the data in the table below show,
world supplies have increased faster than world imports, and output in
India has again increased considerably faster than exports. The increase
in world imports has lagged behind growth in population.
Annual averages
1934-38. 1949-51. 1952-54. 1949-51. 1952-54.
Million lb. Index No.
1934-38 = 100
World supplies* . . 981 1,166 1,233 119 126
World imports . . . . 871 913 996 105 114
Consumption in producing countries t 110 253 237 230 215
India: + supplies . . . . (390) 610 625 156 160
Domestic absorption t . . . (70) 170 190 243 271
Exports . . . . . (320) 440 435 138 136
Source: International Tea Committee, Report1954-55, pp. 28-9.
* Defined as output in the main tea-producing countries and exports from China and Japan.
f Derived by subtraction.
+ Pre-war data adjusted to refer to present-day Indian territories.

CottonTextiles. The general decline in import demand for cotton textiles

is too well known to need additional emphasis. For instance, world trade
in cotton and rayon piece goods declined by 10% between 1910-13 and
1926-28, by 13% in the next ten years, and by a further tenth between
1936-38 and 1951 1 (notwithstanding the statistical boost given by the
partition of India, whose cloth output previously consumed by Pakistan
1 ECE, EconomicSurveyof EuropeSince the War (1953), p. 191.

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
496 THE ECONOMIC JOURNAL [SEPT.

began to appear in world exports). Although the world population in-

creased by more than half during this period, the actual volume Qf textile
exports was thus nearly 30% lower.
The changes in output and exports of cotton cloth in India in recent
years are shown below:
1950. 1951. 1953.
1952. 1954. 1955. 1956.
Million yards
Output . . . 3,660 4,080 4,596 4,884 5,004 5,100 5,306
Exports . . . 1,116 780 600 600 864 744 744
In % of output
Exports . . . 30 19 13 12 17 15 14
Source: MonthlyAbstractof Statistics (New Delhi).

Thus, output has gone up by nearly 45%, but exports have fallen by a
third from the peak levels in the early post-war years.
Groundnut Oil. The developmentsin the output and exports of ground-
nuts and oil (the most important item in the group nuts and vegetable oils),
as may be seen from the table below, run again on similar lines.
1934-38. 1948-52. 1953-55. 1948-52. 1953-55.
Thousand tons in Index numbers
nuts-in-shell equivalent * pre-war = 100
Groundnuts Annual averages
World output. . . . . 9,100 9,900 10,930 109 120
World exports. . . . . 3,240 1,810 2,070 56 64
Consumption in producing countries t 5,860 8,090 8,860 138 151
India: output. . . . . 3,196 3,197 3,836 100 120
Exports . . . . . 1,050 240 240 23 23
Domestic availability t . . 2,146 2,957 3,596 138 168
Source: FAO, rearbookson Productionand Trade,and MonthlyBulletins.
* Conversion factors used are: oil equivalent = 30% of unshelled and 43% of shelled weight
of groundnuts.
t Derived by subtraction.
World output in recent years is a fifth higher than in pre-war years,
whereas world exports are a third below: exports have declined from 36%
of total output to only 19%. In India, output has increased by 20% (as a
result of partition and natural increase, the population supplied from
domestic output is now somewhat lower than in pre-war years), whereas
exportshave fallen to only a fourth of the pre-war level.
The brief review of the four major commodities that figure in India's
exportsindicates that in all cases domestic supply has increased and can be
increased even more over a period of time if there was an adequate demand.
As far as the exports of minerals and ores (mica, manganese and iron ores)
are concerned, export demand rather than ability to expand is again the de-
cisivefactor. The stagnationin the overallvolume of exports (the increasein
the volume of tea being offset by the decline in others) has continued despite
strenuousefforts at export promotion and a preparednessto export even if it
meant restrictions on, or very limited increases in, domestic supplies, thus
underlining stagnant export demand as the main cause in keeping the
export level stable.

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1959] EXPORT PROSPECTS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: INDIA 497

Against this background, it is not surprising at all that the export ex-
pectations of the First Five-year Plan were not fulfilled. The Planning
Commissionhad estimated that the volume of exports at the end of the Plan
period would rise by 30% compared with that in 1948-49, and by 10%
compared with the boom year 1950-51. In practice, the average volume
of exports for the Plan period was only 10% higher as compared with
1948-49, and about 10% lower as compared with 1950-51. The increases
expected in the exports of the major commodities were also not realised.
The reason for the stagnation in India's export trade may be simply
expressed: India has been trying to sell more of the wrong things to the
wrong places. The efforts at export promotion can no doubt be increased,
and high-pressuresalesmanship in export markets may increase somewhat
the exports to some destinations. The main fact, nevertheless,remains that
offering more of the same things to the same people, who no longer want
more of them, lies at the basis of a remarkably poor performance in the
export trade over the last three decades.

II. EXPORT PROSPECTS

Targetsfor theSecondPlan Period
The export perspectives for the Second Five-year Plan (1956-60) were
set out by the Planning Commissionas shown in Table IV. With the poor
performanceof this sector during the first Plan as a background,it was to be
expected that the targets during the second Plan would be modest. The
value of total exports in the last year of the Plan (1960-61) is to be some 9%
higher than in 1954 (a year with low exports), though not much different
from the annual average for the last eight years. The annual average
exports for the Second Five-year Plan period as a whole, however, are in
fact expected to be some 3-4% lower than the annual average for the last
eight years.
There are some interesting changes with regard to export expectations
for several commodities as compared with the first Plan. Instead of hoping
to raise the volume of exports of jute yarns and manufacturesfrom 929,000
tons in 1948-49 to 1 million tons in the last year of the first Plan (1955-56),
it is now recognisedthat it will be good if the exports during the second Plan
run at an annual average of some 875,000 tons.'
The target of raising the exports of cotton textiles to 1,000 million yards,
unrealised during the first Plan, reappears as a hardy perennial for the
second Plan. " Cotton textiles," wrote the Planning Commission, " is one
of the oldest industries in the country, and it would be natural to expect it
to play an increasingrole as a foreign-exchangeearner. On the other hand,
the domestic demand for textilesis on the increase." 2 Here the Commission
1 Planning Commission, First Five rear Plan, p. 458.
2 Planning Commission, SecondFive YearPlan (New Delhi, 1956), p. 97.
No. 275.-VOL. LXIX. KK

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
498 THE ECONOMIC JOURNAL [SEPT.

TABLE IV
EstimatedExportsDuringtheSecondFive-yearPlan, 1956-60
Annual Last Change between Crude *
1954 average year of 1954 and indica-
current 2nd Plan 1960-61. tions for
Items. prices, plan. 1960-61. 1975,
Rs. -____-____ Rs. crorest
crores;t Rs. crores t in 1955 prices. % rn1955
prices.

1. Itemsshowinglittle change
Tea . . . . . 131 127 133 2 2 150
Jute yarns and manufactures . 122 122 118 -4 -3 110
Cotton yarn and manufactures 72 75 84 12 18 60
Hides, skins and leather. . 29 28 28 -1 -3 30
Cotton, raw and waste 19 22 22 3 17 20
Coal and coke . 6 5 3 -3 -50 5
Chemicals, drugs and medicines 5 5 5 _ 10
"Others "-(miscellaneous) 130 145 150 20 15 175*

Total above . . 514 529 543 29 6 550-570

2. Itemsshowingmarkedrise:
Vegetable oils . . . 11 22 24 13 118 40
Tobacco . . . . 12 15 17 5 42 30
Metallic ores, scrap iron, steel. 23 23 27 4 17
Cutlery, hardware, vehicles, 180-280*
electricalgoods and appara-
tus and machinery . . 3 4 4 1 33

Total above . . . 49 64 72 23 47 250-350*

Total exports . . . 563 593 615 52 9 800-900

Total imports . . . . 620 868 786 166 27 800-900

Trade balance . . . -57 -275 -171 -108

Source: Planning Commission, SecondFive rear Plan (New Delhi, 1956), pp. 97, 99.
* These are only illustrative figures for emphasising that an expansion by a third to a half in
total proceeds would require very big increases in the exports of " items showing marked rise,"
particularly ores, etc., and the new products such as " cutlery, hardware, etc."
t Equals ten million.

was worried that rising home demand would encroach upon export avail-
abilities. The experience of the cotton textile trade over the last half-
century, and of India in the seven to eight years, however, suggeststhat this
is a narrowing market in general. A more likely probability, clearly borne
out by the data for late 1957 and early 1958, is that the volume of cotton
textile exports will be lower than in 1954. The actual value of textile
exports may show even a greater fall owing to the decline in the unit price
of exports. Instead of a rise in earnings by Rs. 12 crores,there will probably
be a fall of some Rs. 10 crores or more from the earnings in 1954.
The additional proceeds of Rs. 20 crores expected from the " other"
miscellaneous items are " assumed to bring in the same level of earnings as
at present (1955)." 1 The level in 1955, however, was higher by Rs. 20
1 Planning Commission, SecondFive rear Plan (New Dehli, 1956), p. 98. One crore = ten
million.

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1959] EXPORT PROSPECTS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: INDIA 499

croresthan in 1954. The increase expected is thereforenot the result of any

development, but only a statistical illusion caused by comparisonwith a low
base year.
There has been considerable uninformed talk about the gains that may
be realised from increasing the exports of the products of many of the new
industries in India. The Planning Commission itself had raised hopes in
this respectin the first Plan. During the second Plan period the expectations
put forward by the Planning Commissionare rather modest, since at present
this group accounts for only 1% of the total exports. As the Planning
Commission expressed it:
" Mention may, however, be made of the export possibilities for
some of the new industrieswhich have developed in recent years. The
hope was expressedin the first Plan that new lines of export, particularly
in the light engineering field, e.g., sewing machines, electric fans, cycles,
etc., will assume increasing importance as the economy gets diversified.
These exports have not yet reached a level where their earnings could
be regarded as quantitatively significant. It will be some time before
these new industries establish themselves firmly and secure sizeable
export markets."1
The change expected from this item during the second Plan is, as can be
seen from the table, negligible.
Thus, there is little real basis for expecting any marked increase in the
export proceeds during the second Plan. All that can be said is that they
may go up a little or down a little, but certainly will not rise significantly.
A rise in the volume of exports of some items may even be offisetby a fall in
the export price. On the basis of the experience of the first Plan, as well as
from prospectsoutlined above for the second Plan, it is fair to conclude that
India's export earnings for the decade as a whole will show little change,
although the national income, assuming that the expectations of the second
Plan are fulfilled, will have risen by over 45%. This conclusion only re-
inforces the generally stagnant character of India's export trade as discussed
in the first section of this study.
Long-term Perspectives
With the imperfectionsinherent in the tools of economists, any attempt
at looking into the future can only produce a rather faint and foggy image.
This is true in general, but, given the basic direction and composition of
India's exports, there are a number of fairly firm elements in the export
set-up of India making it possible to hazard guesses without undue fear
of being too much in the wrong. Since the Planning Commission have
generally used the year 1975 for some of their projections,the same year will
also be used in this study to indicate the broad lines along which the export
sector may be expected to proceed (see Table IV).
1 SecondFive rear Plan, p. 98.

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
500 THE ECONOMIC JOURNAL [SEPT.

Tea. Only a few countries predominate in the imports of tea. For

instance, the United Kingdom alone accounts for 88% of the total imports
into all the western European countries. With the present consumption of
tea at more than six cups a day 1 per person aged ten and over in the United
Kingdom and Ireland, it is barely likely that imports of tea will expand
much. Other countries may increase imports of tea, but tea is only a
marginal drinkfor them. Here again, severe competition, particularlyfrom
the new plantations in Africa, may be expected. All in all, world imports
of tea may be higher by about a fifth, and it should be possible for India to
maintain the present volume of exports, and maybe improve it somewhat.
Jute andManufactures.The exports of jute yarn and manufactureshave
shown many ups and downs in the last forty years or more, but at all the
peak points the export volume has remained roughly stable. This is in the
main the result of a decline in the grain trade, increased use of paper, plastics
and other packing materialsin place ofjute and growth of bulk transportand
reduced handling. In addition, the competition from Pakistan is growing,
and jute manufacturing has developed in a number of continental west
European countries. In the light of these factors, the probabilities are very
strong that the volume of jute textile exports from India will also decline
during the next two decades. There may be some gain in volume if a
marked fall in unit price were to make jute a more competitive commodity;
but in that case the fall in unit price will only serve to offset the increasesin
volume, so that the net proceeds will in fact be lower.
CottonTextiles. Looking forward to the next two decades, it is fairly
certain that both the volume and unit price of cotton textile exportswill fall.
This has been the long-term trend and recent expansion in the use of syn-
thetic fabrics will accelerate it. Moreover, with many newly developing
countries now starting their own textile mills, it would be highly imprudent
to expect a larger share in a narrowing and increasingly more competitive
market.
HidesandSkins,Leather,Cotton(Raw and Waste),andCoalandCoke. These
items account for about 10% of total exports. The volume of exports of the
first two has fallen over a long period, and the exports of coal and coke are
nominal, in that they are by and large for bunkeringpurposes. The exports
of none of these items will increase; there may well be a decline.
" Other" MiscellaneousItems. The group " other," accounting for
nearly a fourth of the export trade (see Ta,ble IV), consists of various items,
such as spices, shellac and resins, mica, coir and manufactures,woollen and
silk cloth, sugar, cement, cashew kernels, etc. The Planning Commission
assumed that export proceeds from this group during the entire Second
Five-year Plan will remain at the level in 1955. The exports of the com-
modities that constitute this group have either remained stagnant or fallen

I Assuming that 1 lb. makes 200 cups of tea.

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1959] EXPORT PROSPECTS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: INDIA 501

over the last few decades. No real increases can thereforebe expected from
this group over the next two decades.
When all the items described above are added up, 90% of the exports
from India are already accounted for. The only commodities that remain
are some agriculturalproducts (tobacco and vegetable oils), ores, metals and
scrap, and products of the new industries, such as chemicals, drugs and
medicines, and cutlery, hardware, vehicles, electrical goods and appliances,
and machinery. Of these, the agricultural products, such as tobacco and
vegetable oils, account for half of this group or 5% of the total exports and
may be expected to increase at the most by around 50% by 1975.
As far as 95% of the exports from India are concerned, there is thus little
likelihood of any marked increase even over the next two decades. In the
past three decades the volume of exports of these items has fallen, and the
trend may continue.
The prospects of growth in the other items may be considered bright in
that they form the core of the dynamic or the most rapidly expanding items
in world trade. The actual level of the exports, however, will largely
depend on the advantages, in terms of prices, quality and terms that Indian
products will offer in the world markets, which can only be expected to
become more and more intensely competitive.
How hard is going to be the task of export expansion in India may be
arithmetically illustrated. In order to obtain an increment of one-third in
total export proceeds, it will be necessary to expand the exports of the
dynamic commodities, now accounting for 5 % of the total, by nearly seven
times. An expansion of the total by half would require more than a tenfold
increase in the dynamic sector. These are large magnitudesindeed! They
will require a basic change in the commodity composition of the export
trade. The dynamic items will have to rise from 5% to between a fourth
and a third of the total exports to attain an increment of a third to a half in
India's export earnings over the next twenty years.
The difficult but very essential task of expanding foreign trade may
also be examined from the angle of the direction of the trade. The basic
feature of India's trade relations with its traditional trade partners, the
private-enterpriseeconomies of the western world, has been stagnation or
decline. This was also true of the centrally planned economies, but for
different reasons (see Table II). The stagnation resulted from the absence
of trade and other contacts, so that these markets cannot be considered
saturated for India's traditional export items. In the last two or three years
India's exports to these areas have expanded two to three times, although
their share is still only 6% of the total.
Here the possibilities of expansion, it would seem, are not closed in the
economic sense, that is, simply not needing more of the products that India
usually offers. The expansion of these economies over the last few decades
has proceeded without recourseto the materials that India usually exported

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
502 THE ECONOMIC JOURNAL [SEPT.

to the western economies, and it may well be that these materials, so far not
available on the marketsof the centrally planned economies, will command a
marked cost advantage over the substitutesnow in use there. The barriers
against increasedtrade are thus non-economic in character. If they can be
overcome,this will open up the prospectsof expanding the exportsof the non-
dynamic commodities. In that case, India's exports can grow immediately
without waiting for a thorough diversificationof the commodity structureof
exports. In view of the low share of the centrally planned economies in
India's exports, it should be emphasised that the expansion would have to
be in terms not of a few per cent but of a few times over the present magni-
tudes of the total exports to them.
This rather long discussion may be briefly summarised thus: even a
modest increase of a third to a half in the export proceeds over the next
two decades would require a big change both in the direction and in the
commodity structureof exports. Without such changes, Indian exports can
only be expected to drift along, as they have done in the past, a downward
curve, despite the increasingnumber of expert bodies and export promotion
councils that may be appointed to reverseit. It is better part of wisdom to
accept this unwelcome and brutal fact and to prepare to live with it.

III. EXPORT PROSPECTS AND ECONOMICGROWTH

The development of the export trade affects the Indian economy in two
ways: one direct and the other indirect. In the first place, growing export
demand means a greater scope for the expansion in the production of the
commodities involved. The increased output of these commodities will be
reflected in the overall growth of the economy. Since most of the com-
modities exported from India are unlikely to show markedincreasesover the
next two decades, the expansion of their output will be limited, and to that
extent the overall rate of growth will also be depressed.
The lagging behind of output in the export sector would not be a
matter for much concern as long as the rate of growth of output in the other
sectors of the economy could be raised sufficientlyto offset the slow develop-
ment in the export sector. It is in this field, however, that developments
in the export trade can be expected to exercise a decisive influence on the
growth of the Indian economy by affecting the volume and the rate of
expansion of import capacity. Since India depends on imported capital
equipment for more than half of the total equipment used in investments in
the country, the slow expansion in export proceeds, and hence import
capacity, places a serious limitation upon increasing the imports of capital-
goods. The volume and the rates of growth of investment, and therefore
real income, in the country are thus inhibited.
The points raised above have an important bearing on the economic
development of the pre-industrial countries in general. During the last
decade considerable attention has been devoted to finding a solution to the

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1959] EXPORT PROSPECTS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: INDIA 503

widening gap in the levels of living between the industrial and the pre-
industrial countries. Reversing this process has now been accepted as an
essential ingredient in the work of all the international organisations. The
gap, however, has continued to widen in recent years,1 suggesting that,
despite the widespread recognition given to the need for narrowing inter-
national disparities in living, the analytical tools used to approach this
problem perhaps need much refashioning.
Simply stated, to initiate the process of narrowing the gap requires that
the rate of growth of real product in the pre-industrial countries has to be
higher than in the industrial countries and the rate of growth of investment
and, therefore, of capital-goods supplies has to be substantially higher still.
Since, under the present international division of labour, capital-goods are
almost exclusively imported from the industrial countries, expanding the
supplies of these goods means that import capacity (i.e., export proceeds) has
to increase correspondingly. The growth of import capacity, however, is
dependent not upon the need for enlarging the supplies of capital-goods for
development but upon the import demand of the industrial countries, which
has in general tended to grow at a rate lower than that of the real product in
industrial countries. Thus the needs of capital-goods imports outrun by
far the supply potential of capital-goods as a result of the much slower
growth of import capacity.
Consequently, whenever a pre-industrial country embarks upon a de-
termined drive to expand investments,it is soon faced with a seriousbalance-
of-payments crisis. The pace falters, the drive slackens and the will
evaporatesin a frustratingstagnation. The reality of the trade relationship
between the industrial and the pre-industrial countries and the present
international division of labour which it reflects, thus act as a built-in
depressorleading to a continuous widening rather than a narrowing of the
gap. Admittedly, the analysis of the trade flows here is a very simplified,
and an incomplete, version of the causal mechanism which lies at the root
of the widening gap; problems such as domestic mobilisation of resources
and capital exports from the industrial countries are kept out of considera-
tion. Even in its bare essentials, however, it would seem to have more to
commend itself as a much closer approximation to reality than the postulates
of the more sophisticated theory of international trade.2 In the quest for
unravelling the complex, the simple and obvious is too often forgotten.
The basic argument of the preceding paragraphs may be understood
1 See United Nations, WorldEconomicSurvey1955, p. 5 and EconomicSurveyof Europein 1958,
Chap. V, p. 5.
2 Folke Hilgerdt, well known for his contributions to the present ideas about the " network of
international trade," noted this in a recent paper. " The fact," he wrote, " that many under-
developed countries do not derive the advantages from modern transportation and commerce
that theory seems to demand is one of the most pertinent facts in the present international situation
and cannot be easily dismissed." Paper at the WorldPopulationConference, Rome, 1954. Cited by
Gunnar Myrdal in EconomicTheoryand Underdeveloped Regions(Bombay, 1958), p. 159.

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
504 THE ECONOMIC JOURNAL [SEPT.

more clearly from Table V, where illustrative projectionsfor various sectors

of the Indian economy are shown. By assuming certain capital/output
ratios, the Planning Commission estimated that in order to increase real
income by 150% by 1975-76, the volume of investment will have to be
raised by 500%. According to the indications in Section II of this study,
however, the volume of exports, and hence of import capacity, may not be
expected to rise by more than 33-50%; that is, the expansion in the import
capacity will be lower than in the real income and much lower than in the
investments. Imports, assumed to equal export proceeds, can thus rise by
no more than a third to a half.' Expressedin other words, the changes in
export proceeds (and import capacity) and investments as a proportion of

TABLE V
IllustrativeExampleof theImplications
of ExportProspects
for India
Actual. Plan. Percentage change
between 1955-56
1955-56. 1975-76. and 1975-76.

Billions of Rupees in 1952-53 prices.

National income . . . . 108*0 273-0 150
Exports . . . . . 60 8 0-9 0 33-50
Imports . . . . . 75 8 0-9 0 10-20
Net investment . . . . 80 47.0 500
of which
Wages and salaries * 3*0 19-0 500
Capital goods * 5.0 28*0 500
of which
Domestic capital goods out-
put . . . . 20 23-0 1,100
Imported capital goods t . 30 5-0 66
Index numbers.
Industrial production . . . 100 650 550
Percentages of national income.
Exports . . . . . 6 3-4
Imports . . . . . 7 3-4
Investment . . . . . 7 17

Note. The figures are rounded to the nearest five or ten. The estimates of national income and
net investment in 1975-76 are taken from the Planning Commission, SecondFive YearPlan (New
Delhi, 1956), p. 11.
* Net investment in 1955-56 broken down into the following rough proportions: wages and

salaries about two-fifths, domestic capital-goods one-fourth and imported capital equipment one-
third. 1975-76 estimates based on maintaining the ratio of wage costs at two-fifths of total in-
vestments.
t 40% of total imports in 1955-56 and assumed to be at the most 60% of imports in 1975-76.
,: Assuming an increase of 60% during each plan period.

national income will be in inverse directions; export earnings will fall from
6% of national income in 1955-56 to only 3-4% in 1975-76, whereas
investment will rise during this period from about 7 to 17% of a much larger
volume of national income.
1 In the 'sixties, the burden of repayment of loans and interest alone may be expected to be as
high as a fifth of the export proceeds. Imports will in fact have to be correspondingly lower.

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1959] EXPORT PROSPECTS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: INDIA 505

By continued and strict import controls, it may be possible to raise the

share of capital goods imports in total imports from 40%, at present to
between 50 and 60% by 1975-76. In view of the fact that the growth of
industrieswill also necessitateenlarged imports of essentialraw materialsand
fuel oils, this can hardly be considered an easy task, though it may have to
be done. It will then be possible to raise the volume of imported capital
goods faster than total imports-say by about two-thirds. But the volume
of investment and, assuming a constant proportion of labour costs and
capital goods in investment, the availability of capital-goods has to
increase by 500% to attain a growth of 150% in real income. As stated
above, the slow development of the exports will thus act as a built-in de-
pressorupon economic growth.
Obviously, if economic development is to be assured,it will be necessary
to raise the domestic output of the capital-goods sufficiently fast to supply
all the capital-goods that are needed for net investment. As can be seen
from Table V, the present domestic supply of capital-goods will have to be
raised more than eleven times, or doubled every five years.' Since total
industrial output may not rise by more than 50-60% every five years, the
output of consumer goods will obviously increase even less rapidly. The
basic parameters in the example may be varied to suit somewhat different
assumptions. But the central implication of the slow growth of India's
export trade will still remain that the domestic output of capital-goods will
have to be raised much faster than that of consumer goods; otherwise there
will not be an adequate volume of capital-goodsforthcomingfor investments
needed to assure economic growth. Many pre-industrial countries, with
export prospects not altogether different from India's, will be faced with a
similar situation.
In the light of the foregoing, it would seem that the whole question of the
development of capital versus consumer goods industries has been discussed
without serious reference to the long-term economic realities in India and
other pre-industrial countries. The enthusiasts for alleged benefits of the
present international division of labour have in the main concentrated on
the cost advantages that follow from continuing to export agricultural raw
materials and finished products based thereupon and to import capital
equipment. These are often reinforced by suggesting that the investments
should be made preferablyin the consumer-goodsindustries, which require
less capital and are quick-maturing, rather than in the capital-goods in-
dustries; and this would lead to a fastergrowth. What is assumed,of course,
is that the export trade of a pre-industrial country would invariably be
expanding fast enough to provide for the capital-goods imports needed for
1 The actual requirements will be even higher because with the cumulative expansion of the
stock of the capital, the proportion of replacement investments in total gross investments will also
rise. See E. D. Domar, " Depreciation, Replacement and Growth," ECONOMIC JOURNAL, March
1953.

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
506 THE ECONOMIC JOURNAL [SEPT. 1959

the rapidly rising volume of investments. In reality, however, this assump-

tion is valid for a few petroleum-producing countries only, which account
for less than 5% of the population of the pre-industrial world. For most
of the other pre-industrial countries, however, it will be necessary to break
the stranglehold of the slowly rising export proceeds (and hence ability to
import capital-goods) upon economic growth by a sharply accelerated rate
of domesticcapital-goods output; the situation will be substantiallydifferent
if capital transferson a verylarge scale will be available.
The protagonists of the heavy industries, on the other hand, have often
used the crude but telling argument: India has mountains of the highest-
grade iron ore, so why not smelt iron and steel and fabricate it? Some of
the left-wing economists have cited the experience of the Soviet Union and
other centrally planned economiesin support of the priorityfor capital-goods
industries; the association of an ideology with an argument made it easy
for the non-believers to reject it.
Apart from considerationsof ideology or of theoretical elegance, however,
the inevitable implication of the stagnation of exports and hence import
capacity is that an adequate flow of capital-goods for investments cannot
be assured without a much faster development of the heavy industries than
any other sector of the economy for some years to come. The import policy
will, therefore,have to be strictly and rigorouslyselective, not just encourag-
ing all capital-goods imports as against consumer goods, but even within
capital-goodsimportsgiving the highest priority to the imports of the capital-
goods that produce capital-goods. This generalisation also applies to those
pre-industrialcountrieswhich cannot expect a rapid enough increase in their
export proceeds to provide adequately for the needed capital-goodsimports.
In the process, the present international division of labour will be altered.
India, a primary producing country, will reduce rapidly its dependence on
capital-goods imports for economic growth in the same manner as the
industrialisedcountries have reduced their dependence on the exports of the
agricultural raw material producing countries.
SURENDRA J. PATEL
Geneva.

This content downloaded from 192.231.202.205 on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:56:26 AM

All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions