Systematic Study of The RF Induced Evapo
Systematic Study of The RF Induced Evapo
Systematic Study of The RF Induced Evapo
L1∼L5 Letters
∗ E-mail: [email protected]
-L1-
-L2- Journal of the Korean Physical Society, Vol. 60, No. 1, January 2012
Fig. 5. Graphs of the (a) size, (b) number, and (c) temperature of atoms in a spherical magnetic quadrupole trap vs. rf
evaporation frequency. The magnetic field gradient is 100 G/cm for the z direction. In (a), solid line is the calculated size versus
the transition frequency from mF = −1 to mF = +1 in the magnetic trap.
absorption cross-section A is expressed as follows; to deal with it and indicates that the magnetic trap is
2 stable.
Λ 3λ 1 After the magnetic trap, we apply a radio frequency
A= , (3)
2 2π δ(r)2 field, which is the transition frequency from the magnetic
1+4 2 sub-level, |F = 1, mF = −1> to |F = 1, mF = +1>.
Γ
The atom is coupled selectively with the rf field, and
where λ is the wavelength of the transition, the detuning the atoms in the mF = +1 level are evaporated out of
δ(r) is a function of the distance r from the trap center, the trap. We observe that the atoms in the magnetic
and the branching ratio Λ for the F = 2 to F = 3 tran- spherical quadrupole trap after an evaporative cooling
sition at the linear polarization beam is 7/3 in our case. process lasting 3 s for several radio frequencies. The
Though the distribution of atoms in the spherical mag- results pertaining to the size, number and temperature
netic quadrupole trap is not Gaussian, the size of the of the atomic cloud at each frequency are shown in Fig. 5.
atoms is obtained by a Gaussian fitting for calculational The spherical magnetic quadrupole trap has a linear
convenience, and the profile is not far from a Gaussian potential shape, and the energy difference between mF =
profile [14]. The hot atoms tend to be on the edger of −1 and mF = +1 is also linear at each position. This
the potential whereas the cold atoms are near the center. is well explained by the magnetic Zeeman shift, and the
The temperature of the atoms in the spherical magnetic energy shift of the magnetic sublevel at low fields is [15,
quadrupole trap could be obtained from the size of the 16]
atomic cloud, and the equation is
∆E = gµB mF B r. (5)
2 µB g
T = B σF W HM , (4) The result of the atomic cloud size is shown in the
5 kb r
Fig. 5(a). The solid line in Fig. 5(a) is the size of the
where µB is the Bohr magneton, g is the landé g-factor, atoms in the magnetic trap calculated from the transition
kB is Boltzmann’s constant, Br is the radial magnetic energy between the mF = −1 state and the mF = +1
field gradient and σF W HM is the radial full width at state for a magnetic field gradient of 100 G/cm in the
half maximum size of the cloud. The number of atoms experimental condition. We surmise that the difference
in Fig. 4(a) is 2.16(7) × 108 , and the temperature is between the experimental result and the calculated value
58(3) µK. The image is taken after holding the atoms of the size is caused by the power broadening effect of
for 3 s in the spherical magnetic quadrupole trap with the rf-field [7]. The size of the atomic cloud for vari-
100 G/cm magnetic field gradient in the z direction. Fig- ous evaporation frequencies demonstrate the linearity of
ure 4(b) shows the profile of the Fig. 4(a) along the ver- the magnetic trap, showing that the magnetic spherical
tical direction (the z direction), and the solid line is the quadrupole trap is stable and that the evaporation pro-
Gaussian fitting. Figure 4(c) is the horizontal profile (ra- cess works well.
dial direction) of the atomic cloud in the trap. We can The number and the temperature of the atomic cloud
detect the absorption signal of atoms in the trap after at various evaporation frequencies are shown in Fig. 5(b)
60 s of magnetic trapping and the lifetime is obtained and (c). The number of atoms is shown on a log scale
26 s (Fig. 4(d)). The losses of atoms are caused by the for presentational convenience, and the line is a linear
scattering of the background gas, the Majorana spin-flip fitting as a guide line. It is difficult to analyze an absorp-
transitions at the magnetic field is zero near the center tion image at frequencies below 4.2 MHz even when the
of the trap and the fluctuation of the current of the AH atomic shadow can be distinguished by eye. We deter-
coil. The 26 s life time of the atoms in the trap is easy mined that the temperature of the atoms in the magnetic
87
Systematic Study of the Rf-induced Evaporation of Rb Atoms · · · – Dahyun Yum et al. -L5-