This document discusses the relationship between training and development programs, employee performance, job satisfaction, and employee retention. It first introduces that employee retention is challenging for organizations globally and that training can impact competitive advantage and employee commitment. The literature review then examines several studies that found positive relationships between training and development, employee commitment, and retention. Specifically, it found that specialized training can increase employee commitment and make them less likely to leave, while general training is seen as an investment in employees that organizations expect to see returns on in the form of commitment and retention. The document aims to assess these relationships between training, performance, satisfaction, and retention in Vietnamese organizations.
This document discusses the relationship between training and development programs, employee performance, job satisfaction, and employee retention. It first introduces that employee retention is challenging for organizations globally and that training can impact competitive advantage and employee commitment. The literature review then examines several studies that found positive relationships between training and development, employee commitment, and retention. Specifically, it found that specialized training can increase employee commitment and make them less likely to leave, while general training is seen as an investment in employees that organizations expect to see returns on in the form of commitment and retention. The document aims to assess these relationships between training, performance, satisfaction, and retention in Vietnamese organizations.
Original Title
Assessing the training and development on employee retention
This document discusses the relationship between training and development programs, employee performance, job satisfaction, and employee retention. It first introduces that employee retention is challenging for organizations globally and that training can impact competitive advantage and employee commitment. The literature review then examines several studies that found positive relationships between training and development, employee commitment, and retention. Specifically, it found that specialized training can increase employee commitment and make them less likely to leave, while general training is seen as an investment in employees that organizations expect to see returns on in the form of commitment and retention. The document aims to assess these relationships between training, performance, satisfaction, and retention in Vietnamese organizations.
This document discusses the relationship between training and development programs, employee performance, job satisfaction, and employee retention. It first introduces that employee retention is challenging for organizations globally and that training can impact competitive advantage and employee commitment. The literature review then examines several studies that found positive relationships between training and development, employee commitment, and retention. Specifically, it found that specialized training can increase employee commitment and make them less likely to leave, while general training is seen as an investment in employees that organizations expect to see returns on in the form of commitment and retention. The document aims to assess these relationships between training, performance, satisfaction, and retention in Vietnamese organizations.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
Assessing the training and development on employee retention
Introducation
Employee retention has become challenging for organisations worldwide.
Human resource managers spend much effort to maintain a high-quality workforce for their organisations. Elrehail et al. (2019) revealed that human resource practices significantly affected competitive advantage. Hence, employees are a valuable asset because they directly impact profits, such as building or destroying their reputation (Elnaga & Imran, 2013)Positive employee performance will lead to success; on the other hand, low employee performancewill lead to failure. According to Armstrong (2009), understanding employees' job happiness and performance were critical to the organizations' success. The Vietnamese economy is booming, creating a significant demand for a high-quality workforce. The competition in the labour market demands that organisations invest in employee retention programs. Mudor and Tooksoon (2011) confirmed that the labor market creates favorable conditions and other opportunities for workers to choose whether they are dissatisfied or dissatisfied with their position. Yamamoto (2011) confirmed that employee benefits management and improved job attitudes mediate the relation between the adoption of family-friendly policies and employee retention. Besides, Skelton et al. (2019) support a significant relationship between job satisfaction, job embeddedness and turnover intent, and satisfied and committed employees are less likely to plan to leave their employment. The significance of employee retention has been recognised worldwide, and organisations have various strategies to keep their talented employee. Hence, it is essential to identify which factors influence employee retention in human resource practices. This paper aims to assess the relationships between training and development, employee performance, job satisfaction, and retention of employees. The findings are expected to help Vietnamese organisations enhance their training and development to retain a high-quality workforce.
In today’s competitive environment companies are struggling hard to design a
most appropriate strategy that could enhance the retention rate and pulls the turnover rate downward. Organizations have realized that competitive advantage could be attained by employees’ skills. There is a great importance of an appropriate retention strategy; many retention strategies are designed that are related to provision of training to employees, and compensation etc. Mohammad I. Fheili (2007) believes that organizations are not interested in providing trainings that are generalized in nature. They are focusing on specialized trainings which is relevant to a specific task and make the employees unfit for competitors use. They are limiting employees’ ability switch to another job in an industry. Organizations are finding ways to make the employees specialized rather than a generalized one, while rest of the organizations consider training as an investment on employees and expect a return in the form of commitment and retention (Danlami Sani Abdul kadir et al 2012).
Organizations are following many retention strategies and in a process to find
the most appropriate one that suits best with an organization’s environment. For most of the organizations the problem remains still under consideration that whether there is a significant impact of training on employee retention or not. This evaluation could be proved useful for organizations to evaluate that whether training and development practice outcomes are in favor of organization for retaining the employees. Employees who value the development of skills for their career growth may be more willing to work for an organization who constantly equips them with well-run knowledge through training and development practice. There could be an indirect relationship between provision of trainings and retention; commitment could act as a bridge. It does not mean that organization ignores other human resource practices except training and development but the implementation ratio of each human resource practice differs. Literature review
In today’s competitive environment there is a great need of employees’
commitment and an appropriate strategy that pulls the retention rate downward. Companies consider retention of employees as a challenge due to the increased flexibility of jobs. Various studies have been conducted that popular HR practices are not the only ways to enhance commitment and reduce retention. Scott Brum (2007) highlighted that when the employees are introduced to more trainings, they show higher level of commitment as compared to others. Roya Anvari et al (2010) revealed that it is possible only with the help of planning training programs that are totally based on needs valuation to achieve commitment and retention. Training is considered important in developing a feeling of belongings among employees. Eva Kyndt et al (2009) revealed that training has a potential to change the turnover thoughts and is an important factor that helps in originating the intentions of turnover. Those employees that are highly committed to the organization have lower turnover thoughts. Trainings basically bring association between commitment and retention. Danlami Sani Abdul kadir et al (2012) has considered training as an investment, organization bears the whole expenditures of training employees which eventually act as an investor and expect a return in the form of commitment and retention from employees. Trainings elevate commitment and retention rate, when employees consider it as investment and force them to offer a return to the organization. Alexandros G. Sahinidis and John Bouris (2007) Training is a long term investment in the skills of employees. Training is not a tool to polish current skills of employees but to prepare employees for future impacts from competitive forces. This kind of training boosts the commitment and employees think that organization is opening doors to our success. This sense eliminates the thoughts of intentions to quit from employees mind and force them to retain. Mohammad I. Fheili (2007) has stated that employee turnover is a major human capital risk for an organization, which needs to be catered. Organizations that provide trainings which are specific in nature applied only to the specific work within the organization that makes the employees specialists not generalists. By doing this Organization limits the employment opportunities and leads to the development of committed employees and will eventually affect retention rate. Thomas Joseph McCabe and Thomas N Garavan (2008) Revealed that with the help of training organizations can provide their employees with practical support and assist in valuable delivery. This encourages the commitment of employees and which ultimately effects retention. Vlad Vaiman (2008) Organizations focus on trainings in order to maintain attractiveness and competitive as compared to others in the external environment. This enhances the organizational status in the eyes of knowledgeable employees and makes them to think that no one cares about you more than us. Anders Dysvik and Bård Kuvaas (2008) Training and development develop a social link between organization and employees. This social link creates a commitment factor that bounds the employee to stay longer with an organization. There is a social exchange between employer and employees due to provision of training. Fathi Mohamed Abdul jlil AL Damoe et al (2012) Training and development results in intangible outcomes such as enhancing employee commitment, retention and employee satisfaction. The basic opinion in these publications is that HR managers should take into account several factors when developing retention policies, compensation is not the only policy and some employees wants skills upgrading opportunities rather than compensation.