Assessing The Training and Development On Employee Retention

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Assessing the training and development on employee retention

Introducation

Employee retention has become challenging for organisations worldwide.


Human resource managers spend much effort to maintain a high-quality
workforce for their organisations. Elrehail et al. (2019) revealed that human
resource practices significantly affected competitive advantage. Hence,
employees are a valuable asset because they directly impact profits, such as
building or destroying their reputation (Elnaga & Imran, 2013)Positive
employee performance will lead to success; on the other hand, low employee
performancewill lead to failure. According to Armstrong (2009), understanding
employees' job happiness and performance were critical to the organizations'
success. The Vietnamese economy is booming, creating a significant demand
for a high-quality workforce. The competition in the labour market demands
that organisations invest in employee retention programs. Mudor and Tooksoon
(2011) confirmed that the labor market creates favorable conditions and other
opportunities for workers to choose whether they are dissatisfied or dissatisfied
with their position. Yamamoto (2011) confirmed that employee benefits
management and improved job attitudes mediate the relation between the
adoption of family-friendly policies and employee retention. Besides, Skelton et
al. (2019) support a significant relationship between job satisfaction, job
embeddedness and turnover intent, and satisfied and committed employees are
less likely to plan to leave their employment. The significance of employee
retention has been recognised worldwide, and organisations have various
strategies to keep their talented employee. Hence, it is essential to identify
which factors influence employee retention in human resource practices. This
paper aims to assess the relationships between training and development,
employee performance, job satisfaction, and retention of employees. The
findings are expected to help Vietnamese organisations enhance their training
and development to retain a high-quality workforce.

In today’s competitive environment companies are struggling hard to design a


most appropriate strategy that could enhance the retention rate and pulls the
turnover rate downward. Organizations have realized that competitive
advantage could be attained by employees’ skills. There is a great importance of
an appropriate retention strategy; many retention strategies are designed that are
related to provision of training to employees, and compensation etc.
Mohammad I. Fheili (2007) believes that organizations are not interested in
providing trainings that are generalized in nature. They are focusing on
specialized trainings which is relevant to a specific task and make the
employees unfit for competitors use. They are limiting employees’ ability
switch to another job in an industry. Organizations are finding ways to make the
employees specialized rather than a generalized one, while rest of the
organizations consider training as an investment on employees and expect a
return in the form of commitment and retention (Danlami Sani Abdul kadir et al
2012).

Organizations are following many retention strategies and in a process to find


the most appropriate one that suits best with an organization’s environment. For
most of the organizations the problem remains still under consideration that
whether there is a significant impact of training on employee retention or not.
This evaluation could be proved useful for organizations to evaluate that
whether training and development practice outcomes are in favor of
organization for retaining the employees. Employees who value the
development of skills for their career growth may be more willing to work for
an organization who constantly equips them with well-run knowledge through
training and development practice. There could be an indirect relationship
between provision of trainings and retention; commitment could act as a bridge.
It does not mean that organization ignores other human resource practices
except training and development but the implementation ratio of each human
resource practice differs.
Literature review

In today’s competitive environment there is a great need of employees’


commitment and an appropriate strategy that pulls the retention rate downward.
Companies consider retention of employees as a challenge due to the increased
flexibility of jobs. Various studies have been conducted that popular HR
practices are not the only ways to enhance commitment and reduce retention.
Scott Brum (2007) highlighted that when the employees are introduced to more
trainings, they show higher level of commitment as compared to others. Roya
Anvari et al (2010) revealed that it is possible only with the help of planning
training programs that are totally based on needs valuation to achieve
commitment and retention. Training is considered important in developing a
feeling of belongings among employees. Eva Kyndt et al (2009) revealed that
training has a potential to change the turnover thoughts and is an important
factor that helps in originating the intentions of turnover. Those employees that
are highly committed to the organization have lower turnover thoughts.
Trainings basically bring association between commitment and retention.
Danlami Sani Abdul kadir et al (2012) has considered training as an investment,
organization bears the whole expenditures of training employees which
eventually act as an investor and expect a return in the form of commitment and
retention from employees. Trainings elevate commitment and retention rate,
when employees consider it as investment and force them to offer a return to the
organization. Alexandros G. Sahinidis and John Bouris (2007) Training is a
long term investment in the skills of employees. Training is not a tool to polish
current skills of employees but to prepare employees for future impacts from
competitive forces. This kind of training boosts the commitment and employees
think that organization is opening doors to our success. This sense eliminates
the thoughts of intentions to quit from employees mind and force them to retain.
Mohammad I. Fheili (2007) has stated that employee turnover is a major human
capital risk for an organization, which needs to be catered. Organizations that
provide trainings which are specific in nature applied only to the specific work
within the organization that makes the employees specialists not generalists. By
doing this Organization limits the employment opportunities and leads to the
development of committed employees and will eventually affect retention rate.
Thomas Joseph McCabe and Thomas N Garavan (2008) Revealed that with the
help of training organizations can provide their employees with practical
support and assist in valuable delivery. This encourages the commitment of
employees and which ultimately effects retention. Vlad Vaiman (2008)
Organizations focus on trainings in order to maintain attractiveness and
competitive as compared to others in the external environment. This enhances
the organizational status in the eyes of knowledgeable employees and makes
them to think that no one cares about you more than us. Anders Dysvik and
Bård Kuvaas (2008) Training and development develop a social link between
organization and employees. This social link creates a commitment factor that
bounds the employee to stay longer with an organization. There is a social
exchange between employer and employees due to provision of training. Fathi
Mohamed Abdul jlil AL Damoe et al (2012) Training and development results
in intangible outcomes such as enhancing employee commitment, retention and
employee satisfaction. The basic opinion in these publications is that HR
managers should take into account several factors when developing retention
policies, compensation is not the only policy and some employees wants skills
upgrading opportunities rather than compensation.

You might also like