Solutions Ch09
Solutions Ch09
Problem 9-1
Persaud Corp.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Cash (5 + 70 – 66 + 6) $ 15
Buildings & Equipment 120
Accumulated Depreciation (16)
Casino 66
Total assets $ 185
Accounts Payable 4
Bank Loan Payable 70
Bonds Payable 60
Common Shares 30
Retained Earnings 15
Noncontrolling interest 6
Total liabilities plus shareholder’s equity $ 185
Problem 9-2
(a)
Yemellas’ common shares and retained earnings should be the same for all three financial
statements as they represent only Yemellas’ shares outstanding and their own retained
earnings.
(b) Equity Proportionate Full
Method Consolidation Consolidation
Return on equity = Net income 150 = 22.3% 150 = 22.3% 150 + 120 = 14.4%
Shareholders’ equity 670 670 670 + 1,200
Current ratio = Current assets 320 = 1.68 896 = 1.34 1,760 = 1.27
Current liabilities 190 670 1,390
Debt-to-equity = Total liabilities 1,040 = 1.55 3,120 = 4.66 6,240 = 3.34
Total equity 670 670 1,870
(c)
The equity method and proportionate consolidation provide the best return on investment
because it is higher than the full consolidation method. The equity method provides the best
current ratio because it provides the highest liquidity. The equity method shows the best debt-to-
equity ratio because it has the least amount of debt relative to equity.
(d)
Current assets 1,760 – 320 = 1.2
Current liabilities 1,390 - 190
Problem 9-3
(in 000,000s)
(a) (b) (c)
Implied Value of consideration given
Fair value of amount invested by Benefit 0 0 0
Fair value of NCI (= value of common shares) 45 40 55
Total implied value of consideration given 45 40 55
Value of identifiable assets received
Carrying amount of amount invested by Benefit 0 0 0
Fair value of Pharma’s own assets 460 460 460
Less: Fair value of liabilities of Pharma (415) (415) (415)
Total value of identifiable net assets received 45 45 45
Acquisition differential 0 (5) 10
Assigned on consolidation to:
Goodwill 10
Gain on purchase (5) .
Balance to assign 0 0 0
Noncontrolling interest 45 40 55
$1,560 $1,560 $1,570
Problem 9-4
Unrealized profits After tax
Closing inventory – Prince selling 40,000
– Albert selling 72,000
(b)
Future income taxes liability on the consolidation balance sheet: 3,475 = same as above
Noncontrolling interest on the consolidation balance sheet:
Acquisition cost for 80% of Subsidiary’s shares 10,500
Implied value for 100% of Subsidiary’s shares 13,125
NCI’s percentage ownership 20%
NCI’s value on consolidated balance sheet 2,625
Problem 9-7
(a)
Deferred liabilities pertaining to the subsidiary, Kindersley
Fair value Tax basis Difference
Inventory 3,160 3,660) (500))
Patent 5,300 3,500) 1,800)
Total 1,300)
Subsidiary's future tax rate 40%)
Subsidiary’s future tax liability – in total for consolidation 520
- already reported by Kindersley on separate entity books 400
- adjustment required on consolidation
120
(c)
Future income tax payable
Darrell’s separate entity books 1,570
Kindersley’s separate entity books 390
Adjustment on consolidation 240
Total 2,200
Goodwill 660
Problem 9-8
Revenue test
Percentage
Revenues of total
A 12,000 31%
B 9,600 24%
C 7,200 18%
D 3,600 9%
E 5,100 13%
F 1,800 5%
39,300 100%
Asset test
Percentage of
Assets total
A 24,000 30%
B 21,000 26%
C 15,000 19%
D 9,000 11%
E 8,400 10%
F 3,600 4%
81,000 100%
From the asset test, only segment F is not reportable. Since each other segment must be
reported separately, segment F will be reported separately by default.
Problem 9-9
(a)
Fair value of plant and equipment transferred $1,380,000
Carrying amount on Amco's books 1,120,000
Potential gain on transfer to joint venture (Bearcat) 260,000
Amco's portion – 35% (unrealized) 91,000
Newstar's portion – 65% 169,000
Recognized on transfer 169,000
(the entire amount because the transaction has commercial substance)
Recognized later $0
Jan. 1, Year 1
Cash 469,000
Investment in Bearcat (1,380,000 - 469,000) 911,000
Plant and equipment 1,120,000
Unrealized gain - contra account 91,000
Gain on transfer to Bearcat 169,000
(b)
Since the transaction does not have commercial substance, a gain can only be recognized to
the extent of portion realized via cash regardless of whether it was received indirectly from
Newstar or borrowed by the joint venture.
Jan. 1, Year 1
Cash $469,000
Investment in Bearcat 911,000
Plant and equipment 1,120,000
Unrealized gain - contra account 171,638
Gain on transfer to Bearcat 88,362
(a)
Equity method journal entries on Clifford's books:
January 1, Year 3
Investment in Jager Ltd. 2,000,000
Equipment 1,700,000
Unrealized gain – contra account 300,000
(b)
Fair value of equipment 2,000,000
Carrying amount of equipment on Clifford's books 1,700,000
Potential gain on transfer of equipment 300,000
Portion recognized due to deemed sale (900K/2,000K x 300,000) 135,000
Unrealized portion –contra account 165,000
January 1, Year 3
Cash 900,000
Investment in Jager Ltd. 1,100,000
Equipment 1,700,000
Gain on transfer of equipment 135,000
Unrealized gain – contra account 165,000
To record initial investment in Jager Ltd.
Problem 9-11
(a)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities pertaining to Mansford
Fair value Tax basis Difference
Inventory 135,500) 125,000) 10,500)
Land 225,000) 90,000) 135,000)
Buildings 39,000) 16,500) 22,500)
Equipment 25,000) 15,000) 10,000)
Noncurrent liabilities (155,000) (153,000) (2,000)
269,500) 93,500) 176,000)
Subsidiary's tax rate 40 %)
Deferred tax liability – in total on consolidation 70,400
- already reported by Mansford 12,200
- adjustment required on consolidation 58,200
The deferred tax liability and the allocation of the Acquisition differential for Problem 11 are the
same as for Problem 19. The implied value of a 100% investment in Mansford is $350,000
($210,000 / 60%), which is the same amount, paid in Problem 19 for a 100% purchase of
Mansford. The only items that are different on the consolidated balance sheet are cash and
noncontrolling interest as indicated below:
Green Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
at January 1, Year 5
(c) Since tax returns are filed for separate legal entities and not the consolidated entity, the
fair value excess in a business combination is not recognized for tax purposes. If the net
assets acquired in a business combination were sold at their fair value, a gain would be
reported for tax purposes because the fair value is greater than the cost base for tax
purposes. This tax obligation is reported as a deferred tax liability on the consolidated
financial statements at the date of acquisition.
Problem 9-13
(a)
Kent Corp.
Income Statement
for the Year Ended December 31, Year 9
Sales $3,180,000
Other income (218,000 – [40% x 107,000]) 175,200
Investment income (Note 1) 130,596
3,485,796
Cost of sales $1,445,000
Selling and administrative 518,000
expenses
Other expenses 109,000
Income tax 418,000
2,490,000
Net income $995,796
Note 1:
Investment income
Laurier’s income $356,000
Kent’s percentage 40%
142,400
Less: Changes to acquisition differential 18,500
123,900
Realized gain on sale of land
Kent selling (93,000 x 40% x 30% x [1 – 40%]) 6,696
$130,596
(b)
Intercompany eliminations
Rent (30,000 x 40%) $12,000
Kent Corp.
Consolidated Income Statement
for the Year Ended December 31, Year 9
Problem 9-15
(a)
Cost of 60% of Joker – January 1, Year 4 420,000
Shareholders' equity – Joker 600,000
60% 360,000
Acquisition differential – Jan. 1, Year 4 60,000
Allocated:
Equipment 100,000 × 60% 60,000
Balance –0–
POKER INC.
Income Statement
Year ended December 31, Year 9
Sales $ 1,000,000
Investment income from Joker 96,900
Other income (200,000 – 60% x 200,000) 80,000
1,176,900
Cost of sales 600,000
Selling and administrative expenses 200,000
Other expenses 50,000
850,000
Income before income taxes 326,900
Income taxes 105,000
Profit $ 221,900
(b)
Cost of 60% of Joker – January 1, Year 4 420,000
Implied value of 100% 700,000
Shareholders' equity – Joker 600,000
Acquisition differential – Jan. 1, Year 4 100,000
Allocated:
Equipment 100,000
Balance –0–
Intercompany transactions
Management fees 50,000
Dividends (60% x 200,000) 120,000
(c)
When Joker is a subsidiary in part b), the entire gain from sale of trademarks was held back in
Year 5 whereas only 60% of the gain was held back in part a) when Joker was a joint venture.
Half of the gain held back in Year 5 was released into income in Year 9 under both methods.
Since the gain held back was higher in Year 5 in part b), the gain being released in Year 9 is
also higher.
Problem 9-19
(a)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities pertaining to Mansford
Fair value Tax basis Difference
Inventory 135,500) 125,000) 10,500)
Land 225,000) 90,000) 135,000)
Buildings 39,000) 16,500) 25,500)
Equipment 25,000) 15,000) 10,000)
Noncurrent liabilities (155,000) (153,000) (2,000)
269,500) 93,500) 176,000)
Subsidiary's tax rate 40 %)
Deferred tax liability – in total on consolidation 70,400
- already reported by Mansford 12,200
- adjustment required on consolidation 58,200
(b)
Changes to Acquisition Differential
Balance Changes Balance
Jan 1, Yr 5 Yrs 5 to 7 Yr 8 Dec 31, Yr 8
Inventory 10,500 (10,500)
Land 135,000 135,000
Buildings 3,000 (600) (200) 2,200
Equipment (1,000) 750 250
Noncurrent liabilities (2,000) 600 200 (1,200)
145,500 (9,750) 250 136,000
Deferred tax liability (40%) (58,200) 3,900 (100) (54,400)
Goodwill 76,565 76,565
163,865 (5,850) 150 158,165
(c) See below for summary of journal entries.
$ $
925,065 925,065
JOURNAL ENTRIES
3 Inventory 10,500
Land 135,000
Buildings 3,000
Goodwill 76,565
Equipment 1,000
Deferred tax liability 58,200
Noncurrent liabilities 2,000