Title: Mastering the Art of Crafting a Literature Review on Agile Software Development

Embarking on the journey of writing a literature review can be akin to navigating a labyrinthine
maze. It requires a meticulous balance of research, analysis, and synthesis to weave together a
coherent narrative that not only showcases your understanding of the topic but also contributes
valuable insights to the existing body of knowledge. When it comes to a literature review on Agile
Software Development, the complexity is amplified, demanding a nuanced approach and an
extensive exploration of diverse sources.

Agile Software Development, with its iterative and collaborative nature, has revolutionized the way
software projects are executed. However, delving into its vast landscape of methodologies,
principles, and best practices can be overwhelming. Crafting a literature review that encompasses the
breadth and depth of Agile requires a deep dive into scholarly articles, research papers, conference
proceedings, and industry reports.

One of the primary challenges lies in sifting through the plethora of literature available on Agile
Software Development. From seminal works by thought leaders to empirical studies highlighting
real-world implementations, the sheer volume of information can be daunting. Moreover,
synthesizing disparate viewpoints and discerning the underlying trends and patterns necessitates a
keen analytical eye.

Another hurdle is ensuring coherence and structure in presenting the findings. A literature review
should not merely summarize existing literature but should also critically evaluate the methodologies,
identify gaps in research, and propose avenues for future investigation. This requires meticulous
organization and clarity of expression to guide readers through the evolving landscape of Agile.

Amidst these challenges, seeking professional assistance can be a prudent choice. At ⇒

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can rest assured that your paper will
be meticulously crafted to meet the highest academic standards. Whether you need assistance in
selecting relevant literature, structuring your review, or refining your analysis, our experts are here to
provide tailored support every step of the way.

Don't let the complexities of writing a literature review deter you from showcasing your expertise in
Agile Software Development. Order now at ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ and let us help you craft a
masterpiece that will captivate readers and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in this
dynamic field.
Therefore, we present a risk management framework for projects that use the Agile methodology to
help the software development process and increase the likelihood of the project's success. PhD
dissertation. Jyvaskyla University Printing House and ER-Paino Ky, University of Jyvaskyla,
Finland. Information systems design methodologies: A feature analysis. T. W. Olle, H. G. Sol and C.
J. Tully. Amsterdam, Elsevier: 1-8. Also in this paper there are the usage of each groups of
methodologies and how can work two groups together. This comparative review is performed from
the standpoint of using the following features as the analytical perspectives: project management
support, life-cycle coverage, type of practical guidance, adaptability in actual use, type of research
objectives and existence of empirical evidence. I ndividuals a nd Interactions over Processes and
Tools: T o achieve high per formance no co mmunication gap should exi st which helps to tea m to p
erfor m better t han i ndustry average. But assuring the quality in any system is essential and
imperative part which is very difficult task, which raises a question that: Is quality is assured in the
software which is developed using agile methodology. However, the Agile does not have specific
Risk Management activities. The production of software, which is not in need of personal need, but
increasing in importance in the institutional sense, has changed the dimension with the fourth
industrial revolution. As a result of the fastness in agile approaches it brings rapid delivery of the
final outcome for the life cycle of software development. As a manifestation of this, the waterfall
model and the latest methodology have been included in the software development processes of the
first period and there are a variety of sub-disciplines and agile methods. In Proceedings of the 29th
international Conference on Software Engineering (May 20 - 26, 2007). ICSE. IEEE Computer
Society, Washington, DC, pp 511-518. The important difference between agile and heavy
methodologies is the adaptability for project changes. Accounting, Management and Information
Technology 10: 53-79. Article. Agile development is based on short iteration cycles, which allow
them to respond to changes in business environment. This study intends to review and deduce based
on the risks identified, the relevance and benefits of formally managing risks in agile software
development projects. The generalization of agile software development life cycle provides the
guideline for average developers about usability, suitability, applicability of agile methods. Keyword:
Agile Model, Scrum, Risk, Risk Management. Efficient product delivery is achieved by using short
iterations. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25: 456-473. Article. Agile based software
development is increasingly being adopted by the software practitioners as it assures early software
development and high quality software products. ABSTRAC T “Change is necessary, growth is
option al” said by a John C. Ma xwell. And this Sentence exists very truly in software engin eering.
Explicit risk management promises numerous benefits if properly implemented. However, this does
not work for all cases of software development projects and supplementary means may need to be
applied. RELATED PAPERS Cancer informatics Introduction of hypermatrix and operator notation
into a discrete mathematics simulation model of malignant tumour response to therapeutic schemes
in vivo. Download Free PDF View PDF Agile Software Methodologies Strength and Weakness Adel
Hamdan Abu Arrah widespread reputation. The study also focuses the different success factors of
agile methods, the success rate of agile projects and comparison between traditional and agile
software development. This Paper distinguishes the Traditional RE and Agile RE. Keywords: A gile
software developmen t; Extreme Programming; Scrum; Featu re Drive n Develop ment; limitation;
agile manifesto I.INTRODUCT ION Agile i s greater extent beco ming the dicta te developing
method in the software industr y.
Keyword: Agile Model, Scrum, Risk, Risk Management. Many studies have b een conducted on
agile methods. Case Study”. Distributed Computing(October): 24-28. Melo Download Free PDF
View PDF Cumhuriyet Universitesi Fen Fakultesi Comparison between Agile and Traditional
software development methodologies Mehdi Javanmard This paper is a review research about the
features of the agile and heavy (traditional) software development methodologies and comparisons
between them based on: Investment and Team Size. Eleventh International Conference on
Information Systems Development (ISD '02), Riga, Latvia. OOPSLA'95 Workshop on Business
Object Design and Implementation, Springer-Verlag. This paper focus on use of risk management in
AGILE model. These are Dr. Outi Salo, Jussi Ronkainen and Dr. Juhani Warsta. Author information
Authors and Affiliations Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, PO Box 68, FI-
00014, Helsinki, Finland Pekka Abrahamsson VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, PO Box
1000, FI-02044 VTT, Espoo, Finland Nilay Oza Department of Information Processing Science,
University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland Mikko T. The results show that using our
proposed framework increases the average positive risk reaction score by 49%. PhD dissertation.
Jyvaskyla University Printing House and ER-Paino Ky, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland. In this
review paper four agile methods are discussed as b elow. Our survey results reveal higher adoption of
Scrum based development in present-day software industry as compared to Extreme Programming
and Kanban methodologies. Moreover, quite a few methods continue to offer little concrete guidance
on how to use their solutions or how to adapt them in different development situations. This can be
addressed by introducing an intentional and formal way of managing risks in the agile environment.
In this paper authors demonstrate strength and weakness points in agile methodologies. To browse
Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade
your browser. This paper highlights the underlying risk management model used in tools used for
agile approach of project management. Nowadays agile methods have started replacing the traditional
models. With the help of our finding and results we have evaluated that Agile RE performs better
than Traditional RE in large organizations where changes evolve throughout the development phase
of software life cycle. Also in this paper there are the usage of each groups of methodologies and
how can work two groups together. Presented at 10th International Conference, XP 2009, Pula,
Sardinia, Italy. Product Focused Software Process Improvement (Profes 2002), Rovaniemi, Finland,
Springer. Agile based software development is increasingly being adopted by the software
practitioners as it assures early software development and high quality software products. The
research paper proposed a solution and summarizes that how the quality is achieved or assure in agile
software development using different factors. In this study, both methods will be examined and a
comparison will be made. A lo t of co mpanies are opportunity c lose to a gility in one way or
another becaus e of the need for fast deli very while at the same time dealing with fast changing re
quirements. I ndividuals a nd Interactions over Processes and Tools: T o achieve high per formance
no co mmunication gap should exi st which helps to tea m to p erfor m better t han i ndustry
average. Siponen View author publications You can also search for this author in. Proceedings in P.
Abrahamsson, M. Marchesi, and F. Maurer (Eds.): XP2009, LNBIP 31, pp. 142 - 148. International
Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE23), Toronto, Canada.
Research is carried out by conducting a literature study and finally a case study of software
development to evaluate which approach has better success rate than other. Case Study”. Distributed
Computing(October): 24-28. Agile software development methodologies by the inbuilt features
utilized, control risks. This study intends to review and deduce based on the risks identified, the
relevance and benefits of formally managing risks in agile software development projects. To browse
Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade
your browser. Download Free PDF View PDF Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science
Explicit Risk Management in Agile Software Projects: Its Relevance and Benefits osaki thom manuel
Risk management is the systematic process of controlling risks and it is critical to the success of all
software development projects. It has been observed that many practitioners are using hybrid of agile
methods and traditional methods. Many studies have b een conducted on agile methods. Also
authors demonstrate how strength and weakness factors can affect the overall results of agile
development process. This can be addressed by introducing an intentional and formal way of
managing risks in the agile environment. As a manifestation of this, the waterfall model and the
latest methodology have been included in the software development processes of the first period and
there are a variety of sub-disciplines and agile methods. Download Free PDF View PDF IJCTEE
Impact of Agile Methodology on Software Development Process Gaurav Gupta Download Free
PDF View PDF A Framework For Software Quality Assurance Using Agile Methodology Enika
Fatimah Agile methodology that uses iterative and incremental approach is widely used in the
industry projects as they can satisfy to the change of requirements. Melo Download Free PDF View
PDF Cumhuriyet Universitesi Fen Fakultesi Comparison between Agile and Traditional software
development methodologies Mehdi Javanmard This paper is a review research about the features of
the agile and heavy (traditional) software development methodologies and comparisons between
them based on: Investment and Team Size. The generalization of agile software development life
cycle provides the guideline for average developers about usability, suitability, applicability of agile
methods. In other words, agile development is a modern approach which dea ls with inspec tion,
monitoring, and sel f -Organization, rapid deliver y of quality soft ware and approac hes to custo mer
needs with company goals. However, the Agile does not have specific Risk Management activities.
The research paper proposed a solution and summarizes that how the quality is achieved or assure in
agile software development using different factors. Agile based software development is increasingly
being adopted by the software practitioners as it assures early software development and high
quality software products. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely,
please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. Our survey results reveal higher adoption of
Scrum based development in present-day software industry as compared to Extreme Programming
and Kanban methodologies. The results show that agile software development methods cover,
without offering any rationale, different phases of the software development life-cycle and that most
of these methods fail to provide adequate project management support. Download Free PDF View
PDF See Full PDF Download PDF Loading Preview Sorry, preview is currently unavailable.
Australian Journal of Information Systems 5: 3-29. RELATED PAPERS Cancer informatics
Introduction of hypermatrix and operator notation into a discrete mathematics simulation model of
malignant tumour response to therapeutic schemes in vivo. The Twenty-First Annual International
Computer Software and Applications Conference 1997. Proceedings in P. Abrahamsson, M.
Marchesi, and F. Maurer (Eds.): XP2009, LNBIP 31, pp. 142 - 148. Ag ile process is an iterative
approach in which customer satisfacti on is at h ighest priority as the customer has direct involvemen
t in evaluating the Agile Software Developmen t is the result of that chan ging environmenta l
demand and struggle of researchers to overco me traditiona l model of software d evelopment.
Therefore, we present a risk management framework for projects that use the Agile methodology to
help the software development process and increase the likelihood of the project's success. In this
study, both methods will be examined and a comparison will be made. This comparative review is
performed from the standpoint of using the following features as the analytical perspectives: project
management support, life-cycle coverage, type of practical guidance, adaptability in actual use, type
of research objectives and existence of empirical evidence.
To achieve the aim of this study, the researcher reviewed risk management procedures in a typical
agile setting as well as research that exposed the insufficiency of the inherent risk management
process in agile projects and the identified risks. Agile development is modern approach which deals
with rapid delivery of quality software and full involvement of customers, so the requirement of
customer can be fulfilled and achieve the goals. Some companies have their own customized
methodology for developing their software but the majority speaks about two kinds of
methodologies: heavyweight and lightweight. The production of software, which is not in need of
personal need, but increasing in importance in the institutional sense, has changed the dimension with
the fourth industrial revolution. In this review paper four agile methods are discussed as b elow.
ABSTRAC T “Change is necessary, growth is option al” said by a John C. Ma xwell. And this
Sentence exists very truly in software engin eering. Download citation.RIS.ENW.BIB DOI:
Published: 09 April 2010. So, agi le methodology seeks to increase communication and co llaboration
through insp ect -and-adapt c ycle. Maxwell and in software engineering this sentence exists very
truly. Furthermore it investigates the reasons for which software industries shifted from Traditional
RE to Agile RE. The purpose of this paper is to review the risk management processes in traditional
and agile method of project management. Conference on Empirical Assessment In Software
Engineering (EASE), Keele, UK. Ag ile process is an iterative approach in which customer satisfacti
on is at h ighest priority as the customer has direct involvemen t in evaluating the Agile Software
Developmen t is the result of that chan ging environmenta l demand and struggle of researchers to
overco me traditiona l model of software d evelopment. In agile methodologies changes do easily but
heavy methodologies are static and do not adapt with changes. In other words, agile development is
a modern approach which dea ls with inspec tion, monitoring, and sel f -Organization, rapid deliver y
of quality soft ware and approac hes to custo mer needs with company goals. Also, it offers
responsiveness to changes in user requirements, providing for their quick absorption during software
development. PhD dissertation. Jyvaskyla University Printing House and ER-Paino Ky, University
of Jyvaskyla, Finland. Empirical Software Engineering 11(2): 269 - 301. Article. As a result of the
fastness in agile approaches it brings rapid delivery of the final outcome for the life cycle of software
development. Agile Soft ware Development (ASD ) Agile means “moving quickly “or “flexible”, as
the meaning it also work like t hat. In addition, some types of heavy and agile methodologies have
been described. Download Free PDF View PDF Risk Management in Agile Model IOSR Journals
Abstract: In traditional waterfall-model risks were usually managed by using project risk
management frameworks. OOPSLA'95 Workshop on Business Object Design and Implementation,
Springer-Verlag. The important difference between agile and heavy methodologies is the adaptability
for project changes. Thus, there is strong need of agile software development life cycle that clearly
defines the phases included in any agile method and also describes the artifacts of each phase. Agile
based software development is increasingly being adopted by the software practitioners as it assures
early software development and high quality software products. Download Free PDF View PDF
Agile Software Methodologies Strength and Weakness Adel Hamdan Abu Arrah widespread
reputation. Information systems design methodologies: A comparative review. You can download the
paper by clicking the button above. This methodology affects the risks that may happen in Agile
software projects.