Assignment 3 Ed.300

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

STUDENT: JULIE ANN M.

DALUDDONG
SUBJECT: ED 300
1. What is your take on the removal of Mother Tongue subject in the Basic Education
Curricula?
Removal of Mother Tongue Subject:
The inclusion or removal of a Mother Tongue subject in the basic education curriculum can vary
from one country to another and is often a subject of debate. The decision to include or remove
it depends on various factors, including educational goals, cultural considerations, and language
policies.
Pros of including a Mother Tongue subject:
Promotes cultural preservation: It allows students to learn and preserve their cultural and
linguistic heritage.
Cognitive benefits: Learning multiple languages can have cognitive advantages, such as
improved problem-solving skills and better language acquisition skills.
Inclusivity: It can help minority language speakers feel more included and valued in the
education system.
Cons of including a Mother Tongue subject:
Curriculum constraints: Including additional subjects can put pressure on an already packed
curriculum, potentially affecting the quality of education in other areas.
Resource allocation: Providing materials and teachers for multiple languages can be resource-
intensive.
Standardization: Ensuring consistency and quality in teaching multiple languages can be
challenging.
The decision to include or remove a Mother Tongue subject should be made carefully,
considering the specific context and educational goals of a country or region.
2. Are you in favor of ROTC as a mandatory in the education system?
Mandatory ROTC (Reserve Officers' Training Corps) in Education:
The inclusion of mandatory ROTC in the education system is another topic that varies from
country to country. ROTC programs are typically designed to prepare students for military
service and leadership roles in the armed forces. Whether or not to make ROTC mandatory
depends on the goals and values of the education system and the society it serves.
Pros of mandatory ROTC:
National defense: It ensures a pool of trained individuals who can serve in the military if
needed, bolstering national defense capabilities.
Leadership development: ROTC programs often focus on leadership and discipline, which can
be valuable skills for students.
Civic responsibility: It instills a sense of civic duty and responsibility in students.
Cons of mandatory ROTC:
Freedom of choice: Some individuals may not wish to pursue a military career, and mandatory
ROTC can infringe on their freedom to choose their educational path.
Resource allocation: Maintaining mandatory ROTC programs requires resources that could be
used elsewhere in the education system.
Opposition: Mandatory ROTC may face opposition from individuals or groups who have ethical,
political, or practical concerns about the military.
The decision to make ROTC mandatory should be based on the values, needs, and priorities of
the country, and it should consider the rights and preferences of individual students.
Ultimately, these decisions are complex and can have significant impacts on education systems
and societies, so they should be made after careful consideration of all relevant factors.

You might also like