CER - Character and Resiliency - Vaping Prevention 2023-24SY

2023-24SY Health Assessment CER – Building Character and Resiliency
Student Name: __Jaela ___________________________________ Teacher: __Ms. Merchant _________________________ Period: _3rd _________ Grade: 10th
____________
GUIDING QUESTION: Does developing strong character and health resiliency skills prevent destructive health behaviors like Vaping?
Claim, Evidence and Reasoning Assignment Directions: State your claim based on the guiding question (reword to state your claim). Then find evidence to support
your claim. At least 3 varied sources from reliable, valid and scientific resources. Build your reasoning based on the evidence you have collected, by stating how the
evidence has proven your claim (or in some cases how it proved the contrary). Be prepared to be questioned as needed and to show the resources used if
questioned by teacher. Use this form to organize and prepare your CER and submit for grade. Review Rubric to assist with expectations of how it will be evaluated.
Claim: (10 points)

Building strong character and health resiliency skills helps prevent destructive behaviors like Vaping.
Evidence: (40 points) Reasoning: (40 points)

Document the evidence (direct text, quotes, graphs, charts, etc.) to support How does this evidence you provided support your claim? Be specific, explain in
your claim. detail how the evidence you found supports or provides substantial reasoning
to your claim.
“According to the US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Head Start
Early Childhood Learning and Knowledge Center (ECLKC, n.d.) Developing resilience can enhance your quality of life and happiness while
Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) can “make daily activities more lowering and preventing drug usage in both adults and children. Vaping is an
challenging and impair parents' decision-making and ability to bond all-too common occurrence in adolescents and adults, often a habit acquired
from peer-pressure or the fear of missing out. The idea of seemingly being
with their children. Parental risk for alcohol and SUD can be reduced
“uncool,” is a driving factor for vaping and further drug usage. One of the best
with supportive programs that use informed decision-making and
defenses to the sway of vaping is developing strong resiliency skills and having
healthy behaviors.” the ability to assert clear boundaries with yourself, and those around you.
Research is a key factor in being aware and educated in the best ways to ensure
“According to the American Psychological Association (APA), proper defense against falling into destructive behaviors such as vaping.
“resilience is ordinary, not extraordinary.” In other words, research According to the American Psychological Association (APA), “resilience is
suggests resilience is something that can be learned, developed, and ordinary, not extraordinary.” This means that resiliency can be learned as
enhanced with positive behaviors, thoughts, and actions” an acquired skill and something which can be taught. Knowing how to
build your character and withstand the influences of drug use and
“By developing resilience and other “protective pressuring can establish life-long healthy habits and prevent destructive
factors,” they can reduce the impact of “risk factors” such behaviors like vaping.
as peer pressure. As a result, they are better able to
overcome adversity.”
Sources: include direct links/sites and page numbers (10 points)
https://developingchild.harvard.edu/science/key-concepts/resilience/
https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/148/2/e2020048066/179774/Protective-Factors-Against-Vaping-and-Other
https://extension.usu.edu/mentalhealth/articles/how-building-resilience-helps-prevent-substance-use#:~:text=A%20focus%20on
%20individual%20abilities,et%20al.%2C%202007).
PARTICIPATION ASSIGNMENT CER – SCORING RUBRIC – 100 points (rubric based on 50/double for grade)
Evaluation Areas: 0 points 5 points 10 points
CLAIM Nothing Student response is not a claim Students claim is
provided that answers the question by clearly depicting the
choosing a side within the statement, determining
statement, but a solid attempt which path the student
was made will be investigating
evidence to support or
prove their claim
SOURCES Nothing Student has included sources, Student has detailed
provided but they are not the most valid sources form valid,
or reliable choices or are reliable and scientific
inaccurate sites not based on sites, with links, and
researched scientific facts. Must page found referenced.
include full site for accessibility Also includes 3 sources
of teacher to verify for their evidence.
0 points 10 points 20 points 30 points 40 points
EVIDENCE Nothing Student documentation may be Student includes Student includes Student includes a variety of
provided varied, but if the documentation documentation of documentation of documentation of evidence
is inaccurate and cannot be evidence supporting evidence supporting their supporting their claim (direct
verified/checked, evaluator their claim, but it is not claim, but only one type, text, quotes, links, resources,
cannot determine if sources are from valid or reliable although 3 sources are graphs, charts, etc.) This
valid and reliable student cannot sources or is not listed. Evidence does not documentation adds to the
receive more than 10 points and specifically connected support the scope and depth and scope of evidence
5 on sources. to their evidence and depth of the claim. represented and provides a
acts more like a challenge if their claim is
reference. inaccurate and may further
provide evidence for the
counterclaim.
REASONING Nothing Student attempted a response Students reasoning is Student includes Student includes explanation,
provided that is missing specific details of not dependent on the explanation including both why and how the evidence
how their evidence supports evidence and either why or how their supports the claim or has
their claim. They may also represents more of a evidence supports their supported the opposite. If their
possibly begin proving their continued statement of claim, but only one type. evidence is not soundly
claim is not accurate once their claim, not an Their reasoning is not supporting their claim, their
investigated further. Student evidenced-based complete without reasoning may not be thorough
who cannot find evidence- explanation. evidence that is utilized causing them to reconsider their
supporting claim may adjust in their explanation as to claim (must include explanation
claim and include in explanation. how they developed as well).
their reasoning.

CER - Character and Resiliency - Vaping Prevention 2023-24SY

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CER - Character and Resiliency - Vaping Prevention 2023-24SY

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CER - Character and Resiliency - Vaping Prevention 2023-24SY

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2023-24SY Health Assessment CER – Building Character and Resiliency

Claim: (10 points)

Evidence: (40 points) Reasoning: (40 points)

You might also like