SQB Testing
SQB Testing
SQB Testing
Standard DNV-ST-B203
Standard Qualification Builds L-PBF
The coordinate system test direction and build direction shall be in accordance with ISO/ASTM 52921.
II. Part Qualification
Destructive Testing
Tensile testing
Shall be performed according to ASTM E8/E8M, ISO 6892-1. The parameters to be determined are:
If the relevant part has wall thicknesses below 1.5 mm, a separate thin-walled tensile test specimen,
with relevant thickness, shall be built and tested during part qualification.
Impact testing
Shall be performed by means of Charpy V-Notch testing according to ISO 148-1, ASTM E23.
The notch of horizontally oriented impact test specimens should be oriented parallel (parallel axis) to
the build direction to include as many build layers as possible in the notch.
Hardness testing
Shall be performed according to ISO 6507-1 or ASTM E384.
Through thickness measurements shall consist of at least 5 measurements, equally spaced along the
thickness.
Macrostructural assessment
It shall be performed using 3-5x magnification, typically in the same location as the hardness testing.
Hardness testing specimens and Macrostructural assessment specimens should have the same
orientation (in building and testing).
Microstructural testing
Sample preparation shall be performed in accordance with ASTM E3 and ASTM E407.
Porosity
When porosity is measured on the same specimen used for macro-/microstructural assessment by
means of digital imagery, the porosity shall be measured prior to etching.
The sample on which porosity assessment on the surface is performed should not be machined. Both
contour and bulk should be visible in the plane of examination.
The maximum pore content shall be 0.5% for PBF. In addition, the diameter of a single pore should be
maximum 3 times the layer thickness used. The pores should be homogeneously spread throughout
the material.
Chemical analysis
Should be performed according to recognized standard.
When assessing the chemistry in the as-built condition, care should be taken not to compare it directly
with feedstock specification. The feedstock may be intentionally alloyed to compensate for a change
in chemistry during building.
Post processing
All trapped powder shall be removed from the part(s) before thermal post processing.
Thermal post processing, such as stress relief, annealing and hot isostatic pressing, shall be performed
in accordance with ASTM F3301 or a qualified procedure.
Visual inspection
All parts shall be visually inspected as per EN 13018 or the equivalent on all accessible surfaces in the
final condition. The light intensity at the examined surface shall be minimum 500 lx, recommended
1000 lx. Visual aids (mirrors, borescope, cameras, etc.) shall be applied where direct visual inspection
is not possible.
Surface testing
When surface NDT is required, it shall be performed, using a suitable technique on all the accessible
surfaces of the part in its final condition, after thermal post processing and machining.
Volumetric testing
When volumetric NDT is required, it shall be performed after final thermal post processing.
Ultrasonic calibration blocks and reference blocks shall have acoustic properties that are equivalent
to those of the object to be tested or be made so that differences in acoustic properties may be
compensated for. To achieve this, the blocks and the parts being tested should be built under similar
conditions, e.g. build parameters, build direction and feedstock, as the part being tested.
For UT of parts made by powder bed AM technologies, i.e. PBF and BJT, unless otherwise specified in
the design or product standard, a reference reflector of 1.2 mm flat-bottom hole or equivalent notch
may be used for sensitivity setting.
Dimensional control
A dimensional check shall be performed using an appropriate method based on relevant sizes and
tolerances.
The acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with the information given by the purchaser.
Acceptance criteria
Indications shall be evaluated to determine if they are of a cosmetic nature, or if they are process
related. Cosmetic indications are not associated with the AM process steps, but with handling,
transportation, or storage. Cosmetic indications shall be evaluated according to a visual inspection
criterion that ensures the agreed surface conditions. Material defects or abnormalities arising from
any steps in the manufacturing process, i.e. building, grinding, machining, heat treatment, shall be
evaluated per the acceptance criteria.
Indications shall be categorized as linear indications if the length to width ratio is 3 or higher. If the
length to width ratio is less than three (3), the indication shall be considered a round indication. The
size is measured by the indication size and not the actual flaw causing the indication.
Indications measuring 1 mm or more in its longest dimension are considered relevant indications. If
inspected by UT with a reference curve corresponding to a 1.2 mm FBH, indications giving a response
equal to or higher than 6 dB below the reference curve are considered relevant.