FSA 353 Lecture - Flow Through, Hapas, CC and SD

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 35

Kwame Nkrumah University of Science & Technology, Kumasi

Faculty of Renewable Natural Resources


Dept. of Fisheries and Watershed Management

FSA 353:

PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF AQUACULTURE

G. Owusu-Boateng

Teaching Assistant
Frank Owusu
FLOW THROUGH RACEWAY/SYSTEMS

• A raceway is a system of rearing unit with water


constantly entering one end and leaving through the
other (flow through).

• Fish are continually exposed to new water.

• Relies on free-fall of water for the collection and


removal of metabolic wastes.

• The rearing units (tanks) are relatively shallow and


rely on a high water flow in proportion to their
volume in order to sustain aquatic life.

• Water passes through the systems once and then


are discharged rather than treating and recirculating.
• Designed in such a way that no water is stagnant at
any time in the fish pond.

• Oxygen is provided by the incoming water and is


removed by the fish as the water progresses down
the raceway.

• Dissolved oxygen is replenished by free-fall of


water into sequentially arranged tanks within the
raceway.

• Large numbers of fish are stocked of fish in small


volumes of water.
• Require that inflowing water attain temperature
within the range of tolerance by the species and
ideally at the optimal temperature for the target
species.

• Dissolved metabolites from animals are discharged


in effluent

• Requires complete diets since no natural foods are


available

• Water is usually diverted from streams, springs, or


wells by gravity. Water pumped from wells or other
sources is more expensive and is seldom used.

• Circular rearing units are more thoroughly mixed


TANKS
• Fiberglass
Pond water
• Supply of adequate water is required:
 No nutrients accumulate from source water.
 Continuous supply reduces temperature

o Preferred for trout production

o Undesirable for tilapia, catfish and carp (somehow). Why?

• Tilapia & catfish prefer high temps for speedy growth


• The water flushes pond (washing away fertilizer.
• The water may introduce silt, chemical residues from
pesticides and predators including snails into pond.
 To reduce this, inflow water is screened before entry
• Advantages of raceways systems

• Raceway higher production per unit of space is much.

• Raceways also offer much greater ability to observe


the fish.

 this can make feeding more efficient, and disease


problems are easier to detect and at earlier stages.

 If disease signs are observed, disease treatments


in raceways are easier to apply

• Raceways also allow closer monitoring of growth and


mortality and better inventory estimates than ponds.

• Harvesting is also easier


Disadvantages of raceways systems
• Need large quantity of water and at constant flow

• Require high-quality water.

 Requires high elevation of the water source and


suitable topography for the gravity flow between
raceways.

• Another limitation is the release of effluent. raceways


do not process wastes within the culture systems.

• Effluent releases from raceways are a larger
consideration than they are for ponds.
HAPAS
Hapas are enclosures (cages) usually made from fine
mesh and set up in shallow waters <1.6m with low water
flow rate and level fluctuation (e. g. pond, canal or ditch)
for holding fish for various purposes.

Made of fine mesh netting material.

The mesh size is such that the fry or fish inside cannot
escape.

They are fixed to poles pushed into the pond bottom

They are fixed to bamboo poles that provide flexibility in


high wind.
Advantages of hapa system
Reduce competition for aquaculture land
Easy to move or relocate
Production of uniform sized fry
Easy to observe and monitor species
They are cheap, durable and easy to set
Harvesting of fish is simple.
Easy to clean
Utilizes natural food
 E. g. phytoplankton can pass through the material)
 the material itself provides a surface for algal growth.
Grading, vaccination and handling of fish is easy.
Disadvantages of hapa system
• Hapas are not suitable for growing fish to market size

• Water exchange is insufficient to maintain very high


stocking densities.

• They are fouled quite easily.


• Require intensive management
• High labour cost
• Easily destroyed by strong wind
• Prone to incidence of theft cases
Some production systems

• Extensive aquaculture production systems

• Semi-intensive aquaculture production systems

• Intensive aquaculture production systems


Extensive Aquaculture

• Is a systems of culture in which no human intervention


is made with regards to feeding of the reaing species

• It involves the following characteristics:


 No deliberate feeding occurs

 Fish production in extensive systems is based on


the use of organic and inorganic fertilizers.

 Low stocking density


 Low food safety

 Fish stocked feed on phytoplankton, zooplankton,


bottom-dwelling invertebrates
• Fertilization of ponds promotes the growth of simple
plants which form the base of the food chain.

• Animal health and welfare is not under control

• Amount of fish harvested depends climate and water


quality conditions

• Best used for integrated farming where animal


manure and agricultural by-products stimulate
primary production.
Semi intensive Aquaculture
Is the system the aims at increasing production of
fish from beyond the level that is supported by
naturally available food through supplementation

 Usually natural feed is not adequate

Fish is fed but there is organic matter- live food.

Stocking density is lower than extensive method

[DO] and hence fish welfare may be reduced by the


fertilization in the ponds

Food safety is medium level and customer preference


is high due to the general appearance of the fish
Intensive Aquaculture
A system of aquaculture which focuses on maximum
production from a minimum quantity of water through
high degree of technical and management skill.

• There is greater dependency on commercial feeds

• High stocking densities


CARRYING CAPACITY AND STOCKING RATE
Carrying capacity
• The maximum biomass that a water body can support
in the long term

• The characteristics of the system e. g. water quality


determine the carrying capacity

• It enables prediction of economic returns

• It may vary at areas with extreme variation in water


quantity and quality

• When CC is reached, no significant growth occurs in


culture species.

• Usually average mass remains unchanged for a month.


• Calculated by measuring the total biomass of fish at
this point.
• Is often directly related to daily feed input.
• It affects the decisions on stocking rate.
• It varies with management practices and pond
design, which influence water quality.
100
Total Biomass (kgs)

90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Month
Stocking rate/density

• The number and size of fish in cages or ponds needs


to be given considerable attention.

• Stocking density refers to the quantity of fry or


fingerlings stocked per unit of water area.

• For successful aquaculture, the appropriate stocking


rate needs to be set.

• It is high in intensive fish-farming systems such as


industrialized fish farming, fish farming in flowing
water, or fish culture in a net cage.

 is expressed as the number or weight of fish per


unit area (m2) or water volume (m3).
1
Stocking density α
marketable size
under the same conditions.

 so it should not be too high

 however, below the optimum level, production per-


unit area be low although grow of fish will be faster

 it should be reasonable

• Is affected by factors such as pond conditions, fish


sizes, feeds and operating techniques.

• its determination is guided by parameters observed in


previous cycle (sizes, yields, survival rate, marketing
rate, food-conversion rate, etc.)
If the fish grow well:

• The FCR is close to 1

• High percentage of species reach marketable size


at the end of production.

• The stocking density can be considered optimum.

• Otherwise it should be adjusted (reduced)


How can carrying capacity be increased?

• Improving feed quality to increase bioavailability,


which in turn reduces waste production and therefore
water pollution.

• Using species that can withstand poor quality water.

• Aerating the culturing system to about 10HP/hectare.

• Flushing or exchanging water at  25%/day.

• Undertaking monoculture in systems of poor water


quality.
Carrying capacity with nutritionally complete feed
and no aeration

Electric-powered paddlewheel

Tractor-powered paddlewheel
Carrying capacity with nutritionally complete feed
and no aeration

Clarias
18,000 kg/ha

Tilapia 8,000

Common 4,000
carp
As one moves from extensive system to intensive system:

Intensity
Stocking density
Supplementation
of feed

Contribution of
natural food

• Carrying capacity increases


• Stocking density increases
• Complexity of rearing the fish increases
• Risk of crop failure increases
• Cost of raising the fish increases mostly due to feed and
energy costs
• Total quantity of fish produced increases

You might also like