Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 22 views

    Assessment of Midway Report-15

    Uploaded by

    daredevil4mcu
    (1) The document outlines criteria for evaluating a student's midway report on an engineering project, including design process, ability to redesign, and use of tools. (2) It provides descriptors to assess students' work as excellent, good, average, or poor for selecting engineering principles, identifying alternative designs, and applying mathematical models and software tools. (3) A faculty mentor will use this rubric to score students in each criterion and provide feedback to help them improve their project work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Assessment of Midway Report-15

    Uploaded by

    daredevil4mcu
    22 views1 page
    (1) The document outlines criteria for evaluating a student's midway report on an engineering project, including design process, ability to redesign, and use of tools. (2) It provides descriptors to assess students' work as excellent, good, average, or poor for selecting engineering principles, identifying alternative designs, and applying mathematical models and software tools. (3) A faculty mentor will use this rubric to score students in each criterion and provide feedback to help them improve their project work.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    (1) The document outlines criteria for evaluating a student's midway report on an engineering project, including design process, ability to redesign, and use of tools. (2) It provides descriptors to assess students' work as excellent, good, average, or poor for selecting engineering principles, identifying alternative designs, and applying mathematical models and software tools. (3) A faculty mentor will use this rubric to score students in each criterion and provide feedback to help them improve their project work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    22 views1 page

    Assessment of Midway Report-15

    Uploaded by

    daredevil4mcu
    (1) The document outlines criteria for evaluating a student's midway report on an engineering project, including design process, ability to redesign, and use of tools. (2) It provides descriptors to assess students' work as excellent, good, average, or poor for selecting engineering principles, identifying alternative designs, and applying mathematical models and software tools. (3) A faculty mentor will use this rubric to score students in each criterion and provide feedback to help them improve their project work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Midway Report (15 marks) – to be filled by faculty mentor (Any Three Criterion to be fulfilled)

    Criterion Excellent Good Average Poor Marks


    Achieved
    5 3-4 2 1 X
    Designing Critical selection Effective application Serious deficiencies No or erroneous
    process/product/systems: using and application of of engineering in proper selection application of
    engineering knowledge and engineering principles resulting and use of engineering
    concepts/codes/standards/design principles ensuring in reasonable engineering principles yielding
    manuals/literature etc. reasonable results. solution. principles. unreasonable
    solution.
    Have the ability to redesign Design is Alternative Serious deficiencies Only one design
    products, processes or systems in achieved/being approaches in exploring and presented or clearly
    order to improve productivity, achieved after identified to some identifying infeasible
    quality, safety and other desired review of degree. alternative designs. alternative given.
    needs reasonable
    alternatives.
    Mathematical methods, numerical Computer–aided Computer–aided Minimal application Serious deficiencies
    techniques and software tools: for tools/mathematical tools/mathematical and use of in understanding
    application to the identified models are used models used with appropriate tools. the correct
    engineering project. effectively to moderate selection and/or
    develop and analyze effectiveness to use of tools.
    designs. develop designs.
    Be able to integrate knowledge, New idea was Old idea was Understood the Could not
    handle complexity and formulate developed modified in a new problem but no understand the
    judgements with incomplete or form idea was developed problem
    limited information
    Total marks achieved ∑X

    Name and the signature of the Faculty Mentor: ________

    Name of student:_______________________ Roll number:_______________ Branch:_________

    You might also like