Where Does The Literature Review Go In A Research Paper?

One of the fundamental components of any research paper is the literature review. It serves as a
critical examination and synthesis of existing literature relevant to the research topic. However,
determining where exactly the literature review should go in a research paper can be a challenging
task.

The literature review typically appears early in the paper, often after the introduction and before the
methodology section. Placing it at this juncture allows readers to understand the context and
significance of the research while providing a foundation for the study's methodology and findings.

Writing a literature review requires a comprehensive understanding of the existing literature, critical
analysis skills, and the ability to synthesize information from various sources. It involves identifying
key themes, debates, and gaps in the literature, as well as evaluating the credibility and relevance of
the sources cited.

Moreover, organizing the literature review in a coherent and logical manner is essential to ensure
clarity and readability. It often involves structuring the review chronologically, thematically, or
methodologically, depending on the nature of the research and the disciplinary conventions.

However, crafting a literature review that meets these criteria can be time-consuming and labor-
intensive. Researchers may struggle to sift through vast amounts of literature, navigate different
perspectives and methodologies, and articulate their findings effectively.

For those facing challenges in writing a literature review, seeking assistance from professional
writing services like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can be beneficial. Their experienced writers can help
streamline the process, ensuring that the literature review is comprehensive, well-organized, and
academically rigorous.

By ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, researchers can save time and effort while ensuring the
quality and integrity of their literature review. With expert assistance, they can confidently position
their research within the broader scholarly conversation and contribute meaningfully to their field.
For a lit review, it’s not enough to simply state the author’s argument. A study of the characteristics
of Nottingham Recovery College. The effectiveness of toolkits as knowledge translation strategies
for integrating evidence into clinical care: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e006808.. Afari-
Asiedu S, Abdulai MA, Tostmann A, et al. Have you written a stellar literature review you care to
share for teaching purposes. Introduction OK. You’ve got to write a literature review. This image is
not licensed under the Creative Commons license applied to text content and some other images
posted to the wikiHow website. It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and
may not have been peer-reviewed. Historical background for your research Analyze what has been
written about your field of research to highlight what is new and significant in your study—or how
the analysis itself contributes to the understanding of this field, even in a small way. Open Google
Slides Download PowerPoint If you want to know more about the research process, methodology,
research bias, or statistics, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and
examples. A team should start by specifying the phenomenon of interest, the review question, 9 the
perspectives to be included 9 and the sample to be determined and selected. 10 Subsequently, the
team must finalise the appropriate choice of synthesis. 11 Above all, the review team should consider
the intended knowledge users, 3 including requirements of the funder. For example, the review
discussed involving opinion leaders and patient advocates through social media. Use of templates
and frameworks in study selection and data extraction can be accompanied by quality assurance
procedures targeting areas of likely weakness. What are effective strategies for the implementation
of care bundles on ICUs: a systematic review. In the fields of health sciences and medical
informatics, reviews that focus on examining the range, nature and evolution of a topic area are
described by Anderson, Allen, Peckham, and Goodwin (2008) as mapping reviews. If the literature
review is part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate how your research addresses gaps and
contributes new knowledge, or discuss how you have drawn on existing theories and methods to
build a framework for your research. Here are the key elements to organizing and writing a case
study research paper. Literature reviews can be written using a variety of different styles. Presenting
material that is not directly relevant to your study will distract and frustrate the reader and make
them lose sight of the purpose of your study. Point out overall trends in what has been published
about the topic; or conflicts in theory, methodology, evidence, and conclusions; or gaps in research
and scholarship; or a single problem or new perspective of immediate interest. Finally, there are
epistemological differences across the papers and the reviews. Pivotal publications: are there any
influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field. Adobe InDesign Design pixel-
perfect content like flyers, magazines and more with Adobe InDesign. This notion is based upon the
assumption that people have different skills that complement each other. Spending a lot of time
revising is a wise idea, because your main objective is to present the material, not the argument. If
you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for
literature related to your research problem and questions. This is the most common form of review in
the social sciences. Quick links Explore articles by subject Guide to authors Editorial policies
Literature Reviews Getting started What is a literature review. A literature review is an integrated
analysis -- not just a summary-- of scholarly writings and other relevant evidence related directly to
your research question. The effectiveness of implementation strategies for promoting evidence
informed interventions in allied healthcare: a systematic review. Our trained team of editors and
researchers validate articles for accuracy and comprehensiveness.
Senior leaders include formal representatives of organizations (executives, politicians, or formal
managers) and formal or respected leaders of communities. General Anesthesia — Drinking 300 mL
of clear fluid two hours before surgery has no effect on gastric fluid volume and pH in fasting and
non-fasting obese patients. It would be helpful for systematic reviews, at the very least, to include
more detail about the interventions and their implementation in terms of how and why they worked.
The growing body of evidence is not providing the anticipated clear lessons to support improved
implementation. After the literature review is complete, you should incorporate it into your research
paper (if you are writing the review as one component of a larger paper). This helps you remember
what you read and saves time later in the process. There are various approaches to organising the
body of a literature review. This image is not licensed under the Creative Commons license applied
to text content and some other images posted to the wikiHow website. The focus of the study was to
investigate the relationship between proximity seeking behaviors, attachment theory, and the
development of eating disorders in three groups of adolescents females: individuals with eating
disorders, clinical controls, and non-clinical controls. In yet other cases, research is discussed in
terms of opposing views (such as when different research studies or researchers disagree with one
another). In addition, those works whose theories and conclusions directly support your findings will
be valuable to review here. But it's something to note in your lit review to show that you've
evaluated all your sources carefully. How to write Literature Review Here are some steps to follow
when writing a literature review: Define your research question or topic: Before starting your
literature review, it is essential to define your research question or topic. Seven databases were
searched from 1985 to March 2010. Quick links Explore articles by subject Guide to authors
Editorial policies Literature Reviews Getting started What is a literature review. For example, Some
researchers think x causes y, others that x is only a moderating variable (Carroll, 2006) MS 640:
Introduction to Biomedical Information 16. Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory
previous studies. The protocol should always be publicly available ( table 2, item R2). 24 25 Formal
registration may require that the team has not commenced data extraction but should be considered
if it does not compromise the rQES timeframe. However, many authors have not made such a
distinction, and the terms have frequently been used interchangeably. Sample proposals for the
Writing Pointers for Engineering and Science College students: tips to assist college students of
science and engineering make their writing extra Get a pattern dissertation, thesis instance and
analysis proposal pattern from MastersThesisWriting.com totally free. Our analysis paper examples
consists of outlines, thesis statements, introductions, transitions, and tons of pattern analysis papers
in lots of fields of examine. Our findings highlight the need for a complex way of making meaning
of leadership throughout the coproduction process, such as the ability to be flexible due to
circumstances and employ both strong leadership and more facilitative approaches when necessary.
Use these successful examples as a starting point for understanding how other writers have
approached the challenging and important task of situating their idea in the context of established
research. Literature reviews help “set the stage” for later reading about new research on a given topic
(such as if they are placed in the Introduction of a larger research paper). You can use a subheading
for each theme, time period, or methodological approach. Taxonomies of implementation strategies
do not fully account for the complex process of implementation, which involves a range of different
actors with different capacities and skills across multiple system levels. In these cases, the lit review
just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will
also cover key sources that informed your research methodology. Data were synthesised using
descriptive and narrative techniques to identify themes and patterns linked to intervention strategies,
targeted behaviours, study settings and study outcomes. For instance, most science-based subjects
demand that the evidence you consult be from the latest studies and updated theoretical frameworks.
Reference lists of relevant papers were also examined. Depending on the length of your literature
review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be
thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).
Comprehensive knowledge of the literature of the field is essential to most research papers. Writing
a literature review is not usually a linear process—authors often go back and check the literature
while reformulating their ideas or making adjustments to their study. The team seeks to align the
review question and the requirements of the knowledge user with available time and resources. Use a
citation manager, such as EndNote as the repository for your citations. The review provides new
knowledge regarding the fact that coproduction leadership must become more deliberately
(in)formed by collective leadership models. In yet other cases, research is discussed in terms of
opposing views (such as when different research studies or researchers disagree with one another).
They play an important role throughout this process. You can use your literature review as evidence
of what works, what doesn’t, and what is missing in the field. Systematic review of knowledge
translation strategies to promote research uptake in child health settings. Chronology (this method
will give the worst impression, use only if it really makes sense to your topic!) (University of
Wisconsin, 2006) MS 640: Introduction to Biomedical Information 21. However, the authors
indicated that this intervention would make little or no difference to patient outcomes. What sources
have they cited to support their conclusions. Homework resources gameHomework resources
gameCaribbean studies literature reviews explain problem solving strategies small business financial
planners how to write a research paper for college students. A rigorous example of one such review
in the eHealth domain is presented by Mickan, Atherton, Roberts, Heneghan, and Tilson (2014) on
the use of handheld computers by healthcare professionals and their impact on access to information
and clinical decision-making. Convey it to your reader A literature review may not have a traditional
thesis statement (one that makes an argument), but you do need to tell readers what to expect. You
can find links to more literature reviews in these categories by visiting the TUS Library’s website.
You should select only the most important points in each source. It’s important to keep track of your
sources with references to avoid plagiarism. Ask your professor questions such as: “If you had to
read only one book from the 90’s on topic X, what would it be?” Questions such as this help you to
find and determine quickly the most seminal pieces in the field. This depends entirely on your
university’s specific requirements, so it’s best to check with them. JMIR Med Educ. 2016;2:e16..
Brown A, Barnes C, Byaruhanga J, McLaughlin M, et al. Why leadership of public leadership
research matters: and what to do about it. However, sometimes you may need to add additional
sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body.
What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review. It might give a new
interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. Social Posts Create on-brand
social posts and Articles in minutes. Readers can, therefore, predict which is the area of focus. Create
a matrix of the studies for easy analysis, and synthesis, across all of the studies. Generally, the
purpose of a review is to analyze critically a segment of a published body of knowledge through
summary, classification, and comparison of prior research studies, reviews of literature, and
theoretical articles. Contextualization: Enables researchers to understand how their work fits into the
broader academic conversation and contributes to the existing body of knowledge.
However, sometimes you may need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but
do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. Does the work ultimately contribute in any
significant way to an understanding of the subject? II. You should be able to answer it based only on
a review of existing publications. Therefore, it’s always a good idea to double-check your
university’s requirements before you finalise your structure. You can use any interesting quotes that
you might find useful to your thesis. Publication bias: Literature reviews may be influenced by
publication bias, which occurs when researchers are more likely to publish positive results than
negative ones. However, many authors have not made such a distinction, and the terms have
frequently been used interchangeably. The introduction should clearly establish the focus and
purpose of the literature review. It also helps researchers to identify potential biases or limitations of
certain methods and techniques. Whether or not that is necessary or appropriate can also depend on
the specific author instructions of the target journal. However, identifying a case to investigate
involves more than choosing the research problem. Furthermore, by assigning a literature review,
your instructor expects that you will develop. Begin reading and taking notes on each source, paying
attention to key findings, methodologies used, and any gaps in the research. Two reviewers then
independently read each paper and noted key findings and broad themes of interest which were
then discussed amongst the wider authorial team. Literature reviews can also “stand alone” as
separate articles by themselves. Literature Reviews Literature reviews also provide a solid
background for a research paper's investigation. Spending a lot of time revising is a wise idea,
because your main objective is to present the material, not the argument. Also, make sure to include
opposing views (and not just supporting evidence). The assumption is that by mentioning past studies
and sources in your paper, you have read, understood, and assimilated the works into your project.
On the other hand, inductive logic means, you ought to apply facts to arrive at a theory based on
observations. Throughout this process, flexibility is necessary because leadership constellations
change over time; they emerge and fade away, thus implying different underlying leadership models.
Points out Errors: It points out glaring errors and overlooked questions in your research. This is
essentially the same as step 5 but focused on the connections between the literature and the current
study or guiding concepts or arguments of the paper, not only on the connections between the works
themselves. Purpose of Literature Review Some of the specific purposes of a literature review are as
follows: To provide context: A literature review helps to provide context for your research by
situating it within the broader body of literature on the topic. Use of templates and frameworks in
study selection and data extraction can be accompanied by quality assurance procedures targeting
areas of likely weakness. It is often used as an introductory section of a research paper. The protocol
should always be publicly available ( table 2, item R2). 24 25 Formal registration may require that the
team has not commenced data extraction but should be considered if it does not compromise the
rQES timeframe. Ethics declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate. The images or other
third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless
indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. What are effective strategies for the
implementation of care bundles on ICUs: a systematic review.
Failures of implementation run the risk of stakeholder disillusionment; thus, the management of
expectations is important. How to write acknowledgement in research paper pay someone to write
papers for me fraction solving problem with solution examples of executive summaries for business
plans what is the importance of a research paper dissertation chapter 1 sample. Literature reviews
also provide a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. The effectiveness of toolkits as
knowledge translation strategies for integrating evidence into clinical care: a systematic review. BMJ
Open. 2015;5:e006808.. Afari-Asiedu S, Abdulai MA, Tostmann A, et al. Sample Literature
Reviews An important strategy for learning how to compose literature reviews in your field or
within a specific genre is to locate and analyze representative examples. These authors synthesized
published articles that describe the development process of mobile health ( m-health ) interventions
for patients’ cancer care self-management. For each publication, ask yourself: What question or
problem is the author addressing. Step 1: Choose a topic to write about—focus on and explore this
topic. Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint If you want to know more about the research
process, methodology, research bias, or statistics, make sure to check out some of our other articles
with explanations and examples. You can reach out to the subject librarian for a consultation. But if
you present a term that is obscure or context-specific, you should define the meaning of the term in
the Introduction section (if you are introducing a study) or in the summary of the literature being
reviewed. A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area, and
sometimes information in a particular subject area within a certain time period. The review concluded
that manually generated reminders delivered on paper as a single intervention probably led to small
to moderate increases in adherence to clinical recommendations, and they could be used as a single
quality improvement intervention. Establish the writer’s reason (point of view) for reviewing the
literature; explain the criteria to be used in analyzing and comparing literature and the organization
of the review (sequence); and, when necessary, state why certain literature is or is not included
(scope). For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes,
key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and
economic access. Look to open access publications and conferences to reflect a more inclusive
collection. For example, a book surveying the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict may include a
chapter on the role Egypt has played in mediating the conflict, or look in the index for the pages
where Egypt is mentioned in the text. Perhaps the counselor will offer you some guidance or
manuals you may use to work with. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.
You've now done research and compiled a list of the areas covered by your research. If you are
writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature
related to your research objectives and questions. State-of-the-art literature review: This type of
review provides an overview of the current state of knowledge in a particular field, highlighting the
most recent and relevant research. Communicating Results: Literature review helps researchers to
communicate their results effectively by providing a context for their research. Keep in mind that
UNC Libraries have research guides and to databases relevant to many fields of study. All of these
articles would also have been excluded for failing to include any exploration of the management or
leadership of coproduction. This image is not licensed under the Creative Commons license applied
to text content and some other images posted to the wikiHow website. Establishing trusting
relationships Coproduction is essentially relational and requires concerted efforts to establish trusting
relationships and a sense of commitment. Abortion pro life essay examplesAbortion pro life essay
examples coffee food truck business plan format of a research paper outline template, lesson plans
for writing informative essays shaklee business plan templates math 120 critical thinking problems
pumpkin writing paper free calvin and hobbes homework from school how to make research paper
chapter 2 how to do a business plan templates engineering essay help to solve this problem daft punk
homework tracklist house on mango street essays. What types of sources should I review (books,
journal articles, websites; scholarly versus popular sources)? 3. The conclusion of the literature review
should summarize the main findings, identify any gaps in the literature, and suggest areas for future
research.
Peer Review reports Contribution to the literature Considerable time and money is invested in
implementing and evaluating strategies to increase the implementation of research into clinical
practice. Begin this part of the section by repeating what you consider to be your most literature
review case study example or surprising finding first, then systematically review each finding.
Frequently this means combining all relevant studies to explore the respective foci of each systematic
review. It involves identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing relevant literature, including scholarly
articles, books, and other sources, to provide a summary and critical assessment of what is known
about the topic. A thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme
or issue. You dust off a novel and a book of poetry, settle down in your chair, and get ready to issue
a “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” as you leaf through the pages. “Literature review” done. Unlike
other reviews, this one has beginning, a middle and an end. Explain why you selected this particular
individual to be studied and describe what experiences they have had that provide an opportunity to
advance new understandings about the research problem. Try not to go over 2-3 unless your
professor tells you to. We thus created a table (Table 1 ) that illustrates potential reflective questions
in this context. First, effective MFIs encourage a multi-disciplinary approach acknowledging the
roles played by different professional groups to collectively incorporate evidence-informed practice.
This paper investigates the use and fit of various leadership models for coproduction. This shows the
reader where the literature currently stands, and sets up the intervention that you'll make with your
research paper. Completing the Thesis Statement will help to guide the contents of the Literary
Review Outline. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Literature reviews
are commonly used in fields such as sociology, psychology, anthropology, and political science.
While we try to offer these once per academic year, we find providing the recording to be helpful to
community members who have missed the session. A rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open.
2017;7(7):e014650. Gallan AS, Jarvis CB, Brown SW, Bitner MJ. If there are conflicting studies,
why do you think that is. A case study research paper usually examines a single subject of analysis,
but case study papers can also be designed as a comparative investigation that shows relationships
between two or more subjects. Standards: Description of the way in which you present your
information. Some people do this in a word document, others use index cards so they can shuffle
them. Then, synthesize the information from the sources, identifying patterns and themes in the
literature. Take notes and cite your sources As you read, you should also begin the writing process. A
literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. The conclusion of the literature
review should summarize the main findings, identify any gaps in the literature, and suggest areas for
future research. Finally, average impact scores increased over time with two notable growth periods.
This allows them to develop new research questions and hypotheses to fill those gaps. When you find
a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources. This is
understandable for it determines how the project must move forward.