Understanding the Challenges of Crafting a Literature Review on Animal

Testing
Writing a literature review, particularly on a complex and contentious topic like animal testing,
presents a unique set of challenges. It demands a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter,
a critical analysis of a wide range of sources, and the ability to synthesize this information into a
coherent narrative. This process is not only time-consuming but also requires a deep engagement
with both the ethical considerations and the scientific data surrounding animal testing.

The first hurdle in writing a literature review on animal testing is the sheer volume of research
available. Animal testing spans numerous disciplines, including medicine, cosmetics, psychology, and
more. Navigating through this vast body of work to identify relevant research is a daunting task. It
requires meticulous attention to detail and a keen sense of discernment to separate the wheat from
the chaff.

Moreover, the ethical implications of animal testing add another layer of complexity. A literature
review on this topic must navigate the delicate balance between the scientific benefits of animal
testing and the moral arguments against it. This involves critically evaluating the justification for
animal testing in various contexts and considering alternative methods of research that do not involve
animals.

Additionally, synthesizing the collected information into a coherent and compelling narrative is a
significant challenge. A literature review on animal testing must not only summarize the existing
research but also identify gaps in the literature, draw connections between different studies, and
suggest directions for future research. This requires a high level of analytical and writing skills, as
well as a thorough understanding of the topic.

Given these challenges, it's understandable why many individuals might seek professional assistance
with their literature review on animal testing. For those who find themselves overwhelmed by the
complexity of this task, enlisting the help of a specialized writing service like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔
can be a valuable resource. These services offer expert guidance and support throughout the writing
process, ensuring that the final product is of the highest quality. Whether you're struggling with
finding relevant sources, grappling with the ethical implications, or simply in need of assistance in
crafting a well-structured narrative, turning to a professional writing service can help alleviate the
burden and ensure success in your academic endeavors.
There are causes and effects just like any other scientific experiments. In conclusion, argumentative
essay animal testing, using animals for medical research is ethical and useful because it contributes to
scientific development to improve human health. There might be a picture of a rabbit with its fur all
mangled. We should also look into the matter deeply and compassionately. Testing includes brutal
treatment like water deprivation, starvation, force-feeding of unhealthy and non-edible substances,
pain stimulation, and other such heinous treatment. In this review, an overview of ethical
considerations in the use of animals in research, which have become highly topical and contentious,
especially in recent times, are presented. Due to that, many useful discoveries were made, including
developing of. Upload Read for free FAQ and support Language (EN) Sign in Skip carousel
Carousel Previous Carousel Next What is Scribd. Animal behaviour and research into attitudes on
animal testing. Use of animals for medical purposes is seen to be necessary. They do not believe that
every new drug needs to be tested on animals, especially with the huge database of knowledge and
modern computer models. I understand people are in favor of it when it can save humans (although I
am not so sure of this), but I think cosmetics should surely not be tested on animals because these is
not life-saving and as important as medicines. You insist that there’s something fishy about the food
and you can just smell the dangers that lies in its ingestion. Imagine. Medical experts argue that
animals are not intentionally harmed; they are well taken care of and treated well. Parsley is
considered to be a deadly poison for parrots yet we use it to flavor our food. This proves humans
react quite different than other animals, so testing on animals doesn’t really work. On the other hand
many others believe that while it isn’t appropriate to unnecessarily abuse animals, animal
experimentation must be in effect and continued by labs because of the enormous scientific resource
that animal models provide. At this point, the butcher drains the body of blood by slitting the cow's
throat. Prove to many that animal testing does not work and is misleading. Buy Essay Pay For Essay
Write My Essay Homework Writing Help Essay Editing Service Thesis Writing Help Write My
College Essay Do My Essay Term Paper Writing Service Coursework Writing Service Write My
Research Paper Assignment Writing Help Essay Writing Help. Although the arguments presented
about the wrongness or rightness of such practice vary, the choice on which to believe depends on
people themselves. May be done in an excessive manner; Animal testing may save millions of human
lives, but at the expense of the lives of animals. Humans have, and continue to, treat animals as if
they are property, as if we can own and therefore control their lives and what happens to them. The
paper concludes with such an address by calling for an end to the denigration of nonhuman animals
as experimental subjects who can be used as commodities for profit-maximisation and as tools in
experiments for human health benefits, and the implementation of a more inclusive ethic that is
informed by universal concern about the suffering of and compassion for all oppressed beings. What
attracts the attention of customers in the cosmetic aisle. These points are hotly debated, but there are
no simple, black and white answers. The drug was used to help females with morning sickness
during there pregnancies. A number of people think it is morally right but a large number heavily
disagree. These approaches would give an insight into minimum use of these in scientific related
experiments. Equally, paramount is the understanding that everyone individual has his own viewpoint
and this must be respected even if we disagree with this.
There are different opinions, for and against, relating this controversial issue. The more we know
about life, the greater our respect for it becomes, and the stronger our reluctance to cause suffering
in any creature. Answer: Vivisection is the process of burning, cutting, and inflicting deep wounds
on animals before using drugs on them. Question 3. Is animal testing useful. The supporters of animal
testing argue that if animal testing is eliminated that many of the medications and procedures that we
currently use today would exist and the development of future treatments would be extremely
limited. It also gave us a much better understanding of our own anatomy considering before we.
Research on burns and other injuries to study healing and infliction of wounds. This indicates a
success rate of at least 98% for drug testing procedures. Vaccines for diseases such as tetanus, polio
and TB which have all nearly completely eradicated the disease they are trying to stop had all been
approved by animal testing. It is ironic to spend money on torturing animals where millions still go to
bed hungry. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a
few seconds to upgrade your browser. In the book 'Science, Medicine, and Animals' indicated,
'Animal research has even contributed to better nutrition and sanitation since it has helped to identify
the agents that contribute to good or bad health (Committee on the Use of Animals in Research, 5).'
However, the new lifestyle and vaccines are not the only benefits that people gained from animal
testing. It means they have the responsibility to care for them. Animal testing is the practice of using
newly prepared drugs and other products for humans on animals first to understand its potency and
its side effects. Since much research has been conducted should be stopped to find potential benefits,
disadvantages, and alternatives. No you do NOT own them, you are just simply their caretaker. This
is why companies do like to use psychological testing. The use of animals in research generates two
key questions: Are animal experiments necessary and are they morally justified. However, let's think
for a minute how many of those diseases are not dangerous for us anymore because of animal
testing. There are not here to serve us, they are here for there own purposes. Since then, general
understanding and attitudes have strengthened against the unethical or cruel application of animals
for research purposes. It unethical to cause them torture, pain, and loneliness. They argue that testing
animals does not yield accurate results compared to human application. While it is true that animal
systems differ from human systems, this can back up an argument against animal testing because
when something is tested on an animal and it causes harm but doesn’t kill it, yet its reaction seems to
satisfy the scientists conducting on it, it doesn’t mean that a human using it will react the seem way
and the drug could end up being with-drawn, causing unnecessary suffering and wasting time and
resources. Short Essay on Animal Testing 150 Words in English Short Essay on Animal Testing is
usually given to classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. We withhold non-human animals the very basic rights,
simply because they don't resemble humans. As a result those against animal testing argue that
animal testing should be banned immediately. Humans are callous, brutal and cold-blooded towards
non-human animals; humans have no consideration for the feelings and suffering which they selfishly
inflict on animals. Although some animal testing cannot be avoided now, treating our fellow
creatures as mercifully as possible will demonstrate our humanity. Di lella notes that we know, was
also argumentative and testing animal pros cons essay that the norms of service to his students about
their schedule and workload for the needs of others and in content. With the continuing
development of to research, the claim that animal experiments 'are essential' for particular purposes
must be constantly scrutinised and reassessed.
An example of this to them is that no new drug would first be tested on a human so because they see
them as equals animals should not have drugs tested on them either. With the continuing
development of to research, the claim that animal experiments 'are essential' for particular purposes
must be constantly scrutinised and reassessed. The paper concludes with such an address by calling
for an end to the denigration of nonhuman animals as experimental subjects who can be used as
commodities for profit-maximisation and as tools in experiments for human health benefits, and the
implementation of a more inclusive ethic that is informed by universal concern about the suffering of
and compassion for all oppressed beings. Though much of it is wasted since there is data repetition,
some experiments yield no results. There are animal laws or rights, and they should include the law
that protects them from such treatment. Animals are essential to the survival of humans, whether it
be for food or clothing. Micro dosing. Functional magnetic resonance imagining (fMRI) technique.
We as humans need to make sure that the millions of animals who are used for testing new products
are treated with little suffering. We should also look into the matter deeply and compassionately.
Penicillin was tested on mice and was said to kill humans as the mice had died. In conjunction with
the aforementioned, global regulations and ethical arguments will be considered and analyzed.
Animal testing helped to figure out how to treat thousands of illnesses, and my opinion is there is no
question of morality. Animal research and development usually begin their trials using rats. Often
many animals are killed at the end of an experiment. The gun is designed so that the nail never
completely leaves the gun, but simply is blown into the animal's head and then pulled out by the
butcher as the animal collapses. They argue that testing animals does not yield accurate results
compared to human application; therefore, there is no need to involve animals in testing drugs or
products. He and Defra concealed the letter from the British public. We withhold non-human
animals the very basic rights, simply because they don't resemble humans. Governments and
Regulators only measure a small fraction of them. You have been locked up for days and although
they have been serving you a variety of seemingly appetizing meals, you refuse to eat. Top 9 animal
testing countries in the world are the USA, China, Japan, Australia, Canada, France, UK, Germany,
and Brazil. The practice is regulated to various degrees in different countries. They argue that testing
animals does not yield accurate results compared to human application. I vote for not torturing
innocent animals and caging animals that belong in the wild and testing on prisoners with life
sentences and those on death row. There have been numerous detestations against the use of animals
for research. Scientists use them to determine the effectiveness of a drug or other products and see
any side effects. Organizations have come up to prevent such behavior like People for Ethical
Treatment of Animals or PETA. Results cannot be transferred from animals on humans 1:1 Animal
testing can be expensive; Despite many decades of studying conditions such as cancer, alzheimer's
disease, parkinson's disease, diabetes, stroke and aids in animals, we do not yet have reliable and
fully effective cures. This article will take detailed looks at both the advantages and disadvantages
coming to a clear conclusion after looking at the advantages and disadvantages of animal testing. The
usefulness and contributions of animals in biomedical research are equally highlighted with some
historical perspectives.
People who are against animal testing say that it is misleading because the response of animals to the
drug will be different to that of a humans response. This drug was tested in animals and given the go
ahead to start production to supply to the public. They even have feelings, thoughts, goals, and
needs, a desire that is most similar to human functions and capacities, and all these should be
respected, not exploited in any case. Research on physiology and treatment by giving infliction of
pain. It raises the issue of whaling, a disgusting practice for human profit in meat, oil, bone and
baleen. For Or Against Animal Testing Debating - Esl Worksheet By Karagozian Drugs can be
potentially and immediately harmful to humans, especially during the testing phase of a product, so
animal testing allows for researchers to determine the quality and safety of a product. Animal testing
is a highly controversial subject, disputed among many. Animals are often used as objects for various
experiments and test. The exploitation of animals in experimentation isn’t a new issue because it
could be traced back to the fourth century BC when Aristotle and his contemporaries used to
perform experiments on animals. In “The Plague Dogs,” by Richard Adams, the author’s satirization
of British animal testing practices succeeding in the drafting of new protective laws. Although the
arguments presented about the wrongness or rightness of such practice vary, the choice on which to
believe depends on people themselves. These approaches would give an insight into minimum use of
these in scientific related experiments. These people never think of getting out to walk up a step hill.
Despite numerous opposing opinions about animal testing, the practice is still alive in the 21 century
in laboratories. Ijoma Midrand Graduate Institute grace ijoma As students in the first academic year
of the study of biotechnology and biomedicine it is imperative that certain lifelong concepts are
introduced to you. Because these small animals have similar physiology as humans. Let us unite and
say no to animal testing and use only cruelty-free products, and show our resistance. 10 Lines on
Animal Testing Essay in English 1. It is shocking that researchers still use helpless animals to test new
drugs and products, despite the fact that new medical advances can replace the need to do that. Still
there is too much confusion among academicians and researchers about the future of use of animals
in biomedical research and up to what extent their use in laboratory, research institutions, and
medical colleges. We as humans need to make sure that the millions of animals who are used for
testing new products are treated with little suffering. Animals are commonly used in toxicity testing,
to determine the potential side effects of new drugs or other chemicals. Animal testing has helped in
the past to discover new and effective drugs, treatments for humans, etc. Humans think that animals
are on the earth to be products of human greed and gluttony. It is an extensive process of torture on
the mute animals. They always seemed to think that a horse was something like a steam engine, only
smaller. If it wasn’t for animals we wouldn’t exist, to me it has done more good than bad and
countless lives have been saved due to it, in the future majority of animals will hopefully be replaced
by technology, making it much more easier without any arguments, and the use of animals will be
disapproved. Our society fails to acknowledge that many drugs, cosmetics, and. Even if an
experiment is successful, how many animals will have died of starvation and torture for it. I
understand people are in favor of it when it can save humans (although I am not so sure of this), but
I think cosmetics should surely not be tested on animals because these is not life-saving and as
important as medicines. Scientists who use animals argue that there is no other way of achieving their
scientific objectives, and that alternative methods, such as using computer models or cell cultures,
will not provide the information they require.
Animal testing is a highly controversial subject, disputed among many. Use of animals for medical
purposes is seen to be necessary. It is true that animal testing is useful for producing new drugs and
medicines. Aside from what anyone thinks animal testing does has positives, although some might
argue that they don’t outweigh the negatives. Animal testing should be banned because it is cruel
unnecessary inaccurate and expensive. The power of the purse has oftentimes been much more
persuasive than advertising by activists or even government regulation. After the animal has
collapsed (but still conscious), the side of the killing stall is raised, and a chain is secured to the right
hind leg. We don't even know which sickness killed the rest eleven kids because the medicine was
horrible. However, as far as animal testing is concerned we are confronted with a choice between the
welfare of humans and the welfare of animals. Otherwise, we are still in need of animal testing to
give hope for a lot of people. Argumentative Essay On The Benefits Of Animal Testing 26 billion
animals are used every year for animal testing Animal Testing. Surgery on hearts, lungs, and other
transplants are all possible because of animal research. It is ironic to spend money on torturing
animals where millions still go to bed hungry. Throughout multiple research articles one thing is
lacking and that is, how it affects the animals. Many animal rights activists strongly protest this
practice. This drug was tested in animals and given the go ahead to start production to supply to the
public. The supporters of animal testing argue that if animal testing is eliminated that many of the
medications and procedures that we currently use today would exist and the development of future
treatments would be extremely limited. This has meant a longer, healthier, better life with much less
pain and suffering for humans. From the view of sentiency, it is mentioned that all living things are
morally equivalent. They argue that testing animals does not yield accurate results compared to
human application; therefore, there is no need to involve animals in testing drugs or products.
Download Free PDF View PDF Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare Nuria Querol
Bullfighting Download Free PDF View PDF See Full PDF Download PDF Loading Preview Sorry,
preview is currently unavailable. Various alternative methods and organisms have been implemented
and used respectively in this aspect in the last few years. Animals are often used as objects for
various experiments and test. It is also probably better to have the pros first and the cons second as it
will lead into the conclusion better and the cons will stick in the reader's memory more. In today's
world animal testing has escalated in the united states rapidly. A sources used is a good addition and
shows high-level thinking; remember, it is always important to cite where any statistics come from to
show their reliability. Because of animal experimentation science developed to support-life frame
causing. How many APS are currently published? NAS. Millions 2. What options are available for
improving an APS visibility? NAS. Apart from this, animal research is quite extensive and expensive.
The gun is designed so that the nail never completely leaves the gun, but simply is blown into the
animal's head and then pulled out by the butcher as the animal collapses.
Long and Short Essays on Animal Testing for Students and Kids in English We provide children and
students with essay samples on an extended essay of 500 words and a short piece of 150 words on
the topic “Animal Testing” for reference. We withhold non-human animals the very basic rights,
simply because they don't resemble humans. Animal testing animal testing is one of the most
frowned upon scientific experiments around, but the whole world needs this testing to save the
human race. Download Free PDF View PDF Animals and Public Health Miguel Angel Albitres
Luna Download Free PDF View PDF An Insufferable Business: Ethics, Nonhuman Animals and
Biomedical Experiments Kay Peggs Each year millions of nonhuman animals suffer in biomedical
experiments for human health benefits. I just don’t think it is fair to say “let’s just take an animal to
test on” because to me animals matter as much as (or even more.) humans. In this essay I will first
show the pro’s and after these will follow the con’s of animal testing. This article highlighted and
discussed about various aspects of this burning issue along with several pros and cons. A sources
used is a good addition and shows high-level thinking; remember, it is always important to cite
where any statistics come from to show their reliability. When people buy pets on impulse, one day
they want one, and then they get sick of caring for it, and it gets neglected, which is abuse of the
emotional kind. They discourage the practice of animal testing and animal cruelty. This drug was
tested in animals and given the go ahead to start production to supply to the public. You insist that
there’s something fishy about the food and you can just smell the dangers that lies in its ingestion.
Imagine. See Full PDF Download PDF See Full PDF Download PDF Related Papers REVIEW ON
ALTERNATIVES TO TESTING ANIMALS Vara prasad saka With the advancement of
development in research and medical technology the number of animals used in research has
increased significantly. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely,
please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. Use of animals for medical purposes is seen to be
necessary. However, what about those people who suffer from deadly diseases. Full description Save
Save Animal Testing For Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as
useful 0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print
Download now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 2 Search inside document. Is it the scent of a
perfume or the affordability of a shampoo. A large sum of funds goes to animal experiments, which
are deemed to be quite useful. Animal behaviour and research into attitudes on animal testing.
Animal research or animal testing, also known as animal. Badly designed and poorly carried out
experiments are invalid science, waste animals' lives and are not justifiable; even scientifically valid
research may not be worthwhile or may only be of interest to a few people - there may be better
ways of spending scarce funds; if research results are not subsequently put to good use then animals'
lives have been wasted, and Decisions about animal use are largely made by scientists, for scientists.
Benefits from animal testing may be quite limited; Some animal research guidelines consist of
providing training facilities and support to animal caretakers during operations. Animals are innocent
so they just don’t deserve being treated like this. Surgery on hearts, lungs, and other transplants are
all possible because of animal research. Despite the benefits of animal testing, some of the animal
welfare organizations concerns need to be addressed with adequate regulations being enacted to
ensure that animals are treated humanely. With the help of animal research diseases like smallpox has
been wiped out worldwide. Animal testing uses animals and organisms as a test subject and are
exposed to clinical trials before conducting human trials. When a human kills another human they
are the disgrace of the country, the headlines in the news, and all they did was kill one human, one
insignificant human life. At any rate, they think that if only they pay for it, a horse is bound to go just
as far, and just as fast, and with just as heavy a load as they please. The pros and cons of animal
testing were debated with both sides being able to produce solid reasons for their stands.