Crafting a literature review can often prove to be a daunting task for many individuals, especially

when it comes to composing the discussion section. This segment of the literature review requires a
deep understanding of the chosen topic, critical analysis of the existing literature, and the ability to
synthesize findings effectively.

Writing the discussion section involves more than just summarizing the literature; it requires you to
engage with the material, identify patterns, discrepancies, and gaps in research, and offer your own
insights and interpretations. Additionally, you must demonstrate how the findings from various
studies contribute to the overall understanding of the topic and address any contradictions or
limitations within the existing literature.

The complexity of the discussion section lies in the need for clarity, coherence, and relevance. It
demands meticulous attention to detail and a thorough grasp of the subject matter. Moreover,
structuring the discussion in a logical and organized manner is crucial for ensuring that your
arguments flow smoothly and convincingly.

Given the challenges associated with writing a literature review, many individuals opt to seek
professional assistance to ensure that their work meets the highest standards. In such cases, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ emerges as a reliable ally, offering expert guidance and support in crafting
impeccable literature reviews. With a team of experienced writers proficient in various academic
disciplines, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ guarantees exceptional quality and timely delivery, allowing you to
focus on other aspects of your research with peace of mind. Trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to assist you
in navigating the complexities of the discussion section and elevate your literature review to new
heights.
This is where you would report the results of any manipulation checks. Introduction to Writing in
Computer Science Overview The Writing Landscape in Computer Science Project Lifecycles in
Computer Science Requirements Documents Requirements Gathering Approach Software
Requirements Specification (SRS) Project Proposal Documents Conclusion References V. The
second is a brief overview of the method and some comment on its appropriateness. Was the
independent variable manipulated, and if so, was it manipulated between or within subjects. Chapter
2 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE Introduction. Our team consists of highly accomplished
writers who are skilled at creating worthy academic works meeting quality standards. Chapter 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE Introduction. Once you have collected all the literature
you'll need for the review, start reading the pieces and organize them in a way that helps you while
writing. They never neglect users’ guidelines, as they know that everyone desires to obtain
outstanding writing projects satisfying their demands. We, at EssaysProfessor.com, understand that a
dissertation is the scholarly project of cardinal importance and it has to be produced in the right way.
If they challenge existing theories, why do you think that is. These studies disagree about the most
significant reasons for cheese-based injury with some arguing that choking on cheese poses the
highest risk (Muffet, 2008; Moon; 2009; Rennet, 2011). Reading a longer section will give you a
better overview and fuller understanding, meaning you can choose what is important and relevant to
your own project. Discuss this with your committee and make a list of key terms and concepts to
help you as you start collecting sources. Home Services Business Plan Consulting Restaurant
Business Plan Samples. Example of literature reviews from Helen M Paterson (2004), “Co-Witnesses
and the Effects of Discussion on Eyewitness Memory ” PhD Thesis submitted to. Review Of Related
Literature And Studies English Language Essay. Reviewing the Literature: A Short Guide for -
University of Queensland. While not all fields will require 50 sources (and some may require more),
it's a good ballpark figure to start with. One approach would be to answer the most general questions
and then proceed to answer more specific ones. That is why we do our best to provide our clients
with original texts. Once all stages of the ordering procedure are passed, your piece of writing will
be allocated to one of our professionals who has a respective degree and experience. Online Thesis:
Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Studies. Read the opening of the first five articles and
rate the effectiveness of each one from 1 ( very ineffective ) to 5 ( very effective ). Unless there is
good reason to think they would have, however, there is no reason to mention these routine issues.
The literature review sets up the ideas and concepts that you can draw upon later to help interpret
your own findings. During an orientation meeting at the nursing home, the rules and regulations
were explained, one of which regarded the dining room. For example, if you are writing your paper
in APA style, read the literature review guidelines online so that you know how to properly format
your paper. They know how to create a powerful thesis, put forward compelling arguments
supporting it, and give readers a profound insight about the discussed topic. From proactively
monitoring and fixing your system remotely to enabling you to reset your own system easily, we have
you covered.
If there is more than one, the headings are “Appendix A,” “Appendix B,” and so on, and they appear
in the order they were first mentioned in the text of the report. Figures are numbered the same way
(“Figure 1,” “Figure 2,” and so on). Reviewing the Literature: A Short Guide for - University of
Queensland. More details on preparing APA-style tables and figures are presented later in the book.
The dissertation literature review is one of the most demanding tasks in the thesis writing process
Remember that a thorough, refined literature review is the. The main ones are the abstract,
introduction, method, results, discussion, and references. Online Thesis: Chapter 2: Review of
Related Literature and Studies. Hypothesis (ii) “some neck postures attained in life require
disarticulating vertebrae”, can be refuted.”. For example, the work in your dissertation might expand
on what’s been done in one subsection of the works you’re reviewing. If all the authors are the same,
then they are listed chronologically by the year of publication. Peruse your library catalog and
relevant scholarly databases until you've found at least 50 sources. Our guide with examples, video,
and templates can help you write yours. Chapter 2 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Introduction. Therefore, the cervical range of motion of extinct vertebrates should follow the same
criteria until evidence suggests otherwise. A properly written business plan is one of the first steps a
business should take to get their business. Readers who are more familiar with your field will
generally understand what the results of your experiments say, but they will be curious about how
you interpreted confusing, conflicting, or complicated results. The summary is often followed by a
discussion of the theoretical implications of the research. Then, share how much impact they had on
achieving the aims of your research. Chapter 2 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Introduction. Daempfle Call Number: MAIN Q175.D174 2013 READ ONLINE ISBN:
9781442217263 How to Read a Scientific Article more. less. By Mary Purugganan and Jan Hewitt,
of Rice University's Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication Reading a
Scientific Paper (U of VT) I’ve Got Nothing to Lose by Trying It: A guide to weighing up claims
about cures and treatments. more. less. From Sense About Science. Review Of Related Literature
And Studies English Language Essay. The rest of the steps involve presenting the research question
and the answer to it in words. Discuss the implications of your findings realistically based on
previous literature, highlighting both the strengths and limitations of the research. Even in this more
analytical piece of writing, only the relevant points of the study and the theory are mentioned briefly
- but you need a confident and thorough understanding to refer to them so concisely. It is very
difficult to paraphrase something line-by-line as you go along, because everything seems important
and it is too easy to just lift the phrases the author has used. Some journals now make the raw data
available online. Chapter 2 Thesis - Chapter 2 Review of Related Literature Foreign. The second is a
brief overview of the method and some comment on its appropriateness. By the end of the literature
review, readers should be convinced that the research question makes sense and that the present study
is a logical next step in the ongoing research process. As we have already seen, the authors are listed
in an order that reflects their contribution to the research.
Related Literature and Related Studies - SlideShare. Composing a literature review as well as other
types of papers is considered real art. However, if there are other studies that have failed to
demonstrate it, you should discuss them too. Introduction to Writing in the Sciences 1 Overview 2
Front Matter 3 Writing an Introduction 4 Writing the Materials and Methods (Methodology) Section
5 Writing the Results Section 6 Writing the Discussion and Conclusion Sections 7 Back Matter and
References 8 Writing a Literature Review 9 Final Thoughts 10 Acknowledgements 11 References
Tips For Writing Tutors III. That is why we do our best to provide our clients with original texts. If
possible, learn about the guidelines before writing the discussion to ensure you’re writing to meet
their expectations. It can be tempting to mimic other scholars’ tone and voice when writing a lit
review, but focus on putting your sources in dialogue with your project. This works well for
methods that are relatively simple and can be described adequately in a few paragraphs. If there is
only one, the heading is “Appendix,” centered at the top of the page. The title should clearly and
concisely (in about 12 words or fewer) communicate the primary variables and research questions.
Peruse your library catalog and relevant scholarly databases until you've found at least 50 sources.
However, this model does not adequately take into account Archer's theory of 'Under-reporting'
which states that people are less likely to report frequently occurring small accidents until a critical
mass of injuries are reached (2009). Example of literature reviews from Helen M Paterson (2004),
“Co-Witnesses and the Effects of Discussion on Eyewitness Memory ” PhD Thesis submitted to.
Positive Emotion Dissociation, Social Connectedness, and Psychological Functioning”. For example,
one of the major students’ concerns is the deadline that is usually rather tight. Of course, you’ll need
to summarize the sources enough for your committee to understand what they’re about. If they
challenge existing theories, why do you think that is. The basic structure of your argument, then,
should be apparent from the outline itself. If you are doing a systematic review you will need to
follow a specific protocol for writing it up. They know how to create a powerful thesis, put forward
compelling arguments supporting it, and give readers a profound insight about the discussed topic.
You can find out more about how PLOS processes your data by reading our Privacy Policy. It is
often better simply to end when you have made your final point (although you should avoid ending
on a limitation). Christopher Taylor is an Adjunct Assistant Professor of English at Austin
Community College in Texas. She has also worked as an editor and teacher, working with students at
all different levels to improve their academic writing. This level of synthesis will also show your
committee that you’re capable of making higher-level connections between sources rather than
providing mere summary. This is where you explain what you think the results show. It is acceptable
to argue that the balance of the research supports the existence of a phenomenon or is consistent with
a theory (and that is usually the best that researchers in psychology can hope for), but it is not
acceptable to ignore contradictory evidence. Each subject should also be blocked from
communicating with others to prevent his getting information about their behavior during the
emergency. Discuss the implications of your findings realistically based on previous literature,
highlighting both the strengths and limitations of the research. Example of literature reviews from
Helen M Paterson (2004), “Co-Witnesses and the Effects of Discussion on Eyewitness Memory ”
PhD Thesis submitted to.
He received his PhD in English Literature and Medieval Studies from the University of Texas at
Austin in 2014. Our writers have been producing academic papers, dissertation namely, for many
years and are aware of all their ins and outs. An important principle for writing a method section is
that it should be clear and detailed enough that other researchers could replicate the study by
following your “recipe.” This means that it must describe all the important elements of the
study—basic demographic characteristics of the participants, how they were recruited, whether they
were randomly assigned, how the variables were manipulated or measured, how counterbalancing
was accomplished, and so on. You may need to emphasise some studies that didn’t initially seem that
important, but which are now more useful because of what you have found in your own experiments.
Recall that the standard sections of an empirical research report provide a kind of outline. Including
limitations and negative results will give readers a complete understanding of the presented research.
One way to do this is to start the Discussion with one or two sentences that state the main finding
from the results and what that finding means for the field. Steps for Conducting a Lit Review -
Literature Review: Conducting. It also provides evidence you can refer back to later to help interpret
your own results. Anatomy of a Scientific Article (U of VT) Good Science, Bad Science,
Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk by Peter A. Perhaps there are problems with its internal or
external validity. Immediately after this is the subheading “Participants,” left justified and in italics.
When browsing the sources relating to the assigned topic, one has to realize that all of them have to
be authoritative. In a literature review, you don’t have to refer to each study in the same depth. That
was because the brief was to look at time management in a particular department which had a high
intake of post-experience students. You could have 1 subheading about online-based teaching,
another about uses of technology in the classroom, and another about experience-based teaching. The
rest of the steps involve presenting the research question and the answer to it in words. CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES This chapter presents the related
literature and studies after the thorough and in-depth. They might also be interested to know what
you think the future of your field is. For each source that you read, include a citation, a descriptive
paragraph of the source, and a brief evaluation of the content. Home - Conducting a Literature
Review - LibGuides at Cornell University. It may seem petty, but meticulously formatted referencing
shows you have taken care in your work and have a professional academic approach (and it will get
you marks!). However, based on the findings of similar studies, a more plausible explanation is y.
Example of literature reviews from Helen M Paterson (2004), “Co-Witnesses and the Effects of
Discussion on Eyewitness Memory ” PhD Thesis submitted to. Example of literature reviews from
Helen M Paterson (2004), “Co-Witnesses and the Effects of Discussion on Eyewitness Memory ”
PhD Thesis submitted to. They know how to create a powerful thesis, put forward compelling
arguments supporting it, and give readers a profound insight about the discussed topic. End the
discussion by summarizing why the results matter. It’s not realistic to write an entire paragraph for
each source, so look for ways to group sources together and show your committee that you’re able to
make high-level connections between them. Home - Conducting a Literature Review - LibGuides at
Cornell University. Literature reviews - Example 1 - Student Services - The University of.
Giving readers a clear sense of what the research is about and why they should care about it will
motivate them to continue reading the literature review—and will help them make sense of it. This
might mean multiple questionnaires, written vignettes that participants read and respond to,
perceptual stimuli, and so on. A third preliminary issue is the reliability of the measures. Note that it
includes everything mentioned above: notably research outcomes, limitations, interpretations, and
avenues for future research. The discussion informs readers about the larger implications of your
study based on the results. Home - Conducting a Literature Review - LibGuides at Cornell
University. Remember that your paper should be both confident and honest about the results. For
example, one of the major students’ concerns is the deadline that is usually rather tight. Our
professionals are ready to lean over backward to help you get your Ph.D. Or it might describe one
phenomenon, then describe another phenomenon that seems inconsistent with the first one, then
propose a theory that resolves the inconsistency, and finally present a hypothesis to test that theory.
The opening introduces the research question and explains why it is interesting, the literature review
discusses relevant previous research, and the closing restates the research question and comments on
the method used to answer it. In the first, the participants section is followed by a design and
procedure subsection, which describes the rest of the method. Taylor (2004) has described the
additional time commitments reported by students with young families, and the impact these may
have on effective management of study time. Indicate what next steps can be taken to further pursue
any unresolved questions. Making grand statements about how a study will fully resolve large
questions can lead readers to doubt the success of the research. That is why so many students decide
to ask online masters for help. For student papers that are not being submitted for
publication—including theses—author notes are generally not necessary. CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF
RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES This chapter presents the related literature and studies
after the thorough and in-depth. The experiment reported below attempted to fulfill these conditions
(p. 378). The abstract presents the research question, a summary of the method, the basic results, and
the most important conclusions. You might have extended previous work, showed how apparently
conflicting results are actually harmonious, or exposed a contradiction that currently has no
explanation. Readers who are not experts in your field might read your Discussion before your
Results in the hopes that they can learn what your Results mean and why your paper is important
without having to learn how to interpret your experimental results. It is acceptable to argue that the
balance of the research supports the existence of a phenomenon or is consistent with a theory (and
that is usually the best that researchers in psychology can hope for), but it is not acceptable to ignore
contradictory evidence. Introduction to Writing in Computer Science Overview The Writing
Landscape in Computer Science Project Lifecycles in Computer Science Requirements Documents
Requirements Gathering Approach Software Requirements Specification (SRS) Project Proposal
Documents Conclusion References V. An appendix An optional section at the end of an APA-style
manuscript used to present important supplemental material. If you start writing the lit review before
you've read all of your sources, you may end up having to delete and revise what you've written. The
literature review sets up the ideas and concepts that you can draw upon later to help interpret your
own findings. If they support existing theories, what new information do they contribute. Chapter 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE Introduction. For example, if participants rated the
attractiveness of 20 stimulus people, you might have to explain that you began by computing the
mean attractiveness rating for each participant.