100% found this document useful (2 votes)
65 views6 pages

Discussion Part of A Literature Review

The document discusses the challenges of writing the discussion section of a literature review. It notes that this section requires more than just summarizing findings and instead demands deep understanding, critical analysis, and synthesis of patterns across studies. Two main difficulties are striking the right balance of description and analysis, and exercising critical thinking to assess strengths and limitations of prior work. The discussion must connect various studies and offer new insights to the topic. Professional writing services can help researchers overcome these hurdles by expertly crafting well-supported, compelling discussions.

Uploaded by

afdtjozlb
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
65 views6 pages

Discussion Part of A Literature Review

The document discusses the challenges of writing the discussion section of a literature review. It notes that this section requires more than just summarizing findings and instead demands deep understanding, critical analysis, and synthesis of patterns across studies. Two main difficulties are striking the right balance of description and analysis, and exercising critical thinking to assess strengths and limitations of prior work. The discussion must connect various studies and offer new insights to the topic. Professional writing services can help researchers overcome these hurdles by expertly crafting well-supported, compelling discussions.

Uploaded by

afdtjozlb
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Title: Navigating the Discussion Part of a Literature Review

Crafting a literature review is an intricate dance between summarizing existing research and
presenting one's own insights. Yet, within this, the discussion section stands as a critical juncture
where the researcher must deftly weave together the threads of various studies to illuminate their
significance. However, many find themselves grappling with the complexities of this task.

The discussion segment of a literature review requires more than a mere recounting of findings. It
necessitates a deep understanding of the research landscape, the ability to identify patterns and gaps,
and the skill to offer thoughtful interpretations. This amalgamation of skills is where the challenge
lies.

One of the primary difficulties in writing the discussion part of a literature review is striking the right
balance between description and analysis. It's not just about stating what previous studies have
found; it's about synthesizing these findings into a coherent narrative. This involves teasing out the
implications of these studies, identifying contradictions, and proposing potential avenues for further
exploration.

Another hurdle is the need for critical thinking. Researchers must assess the strengths and limitations
of the studies they include, considering factors such as sample size, methodology, and potential
biases. This critical appraisal is essential for offering a nuanced discussion that goes beyond surface-
level analysis.

Moreover, crafting a discussion that seamlessly transitions from summarizing findings to offering
insightful interpretations requires finesse. It's about connecting the dots between different studies,
explaining their relevance to the current research, and ultimately, contributing something new to the
academic conversation.

Given these challenges, it's no wonder that many researchers seek assistance when it comes to
writing the discussion part of their literature review. Professional services, such as ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔, offer a lifeline to those navigating this intricate terrain. With expert writers well-versed in the
nuances of academic writing, they can help researchers craft discussions that are not only
comprehensive but also compelling.

For those feeling overwhelmed by the intricacies of the discussion section, ordering from ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ can provide the clarity and expertise needed to create a literature review that
stands out. By entrusting this pivotal part of the research process to professionals, researchers can
ensure that their work shines with academic rigor and original insight.

In conclusion, the discussion part of a literature review is undoubtedly a challenging endeavor. It


demands a blend of analytical prowess, critical thinking, and the ability to weave together disparate
findings into a cohesive whole. For those seeking guidance and support in this journey, services like
⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offer a valuable resource to navigate the complexities of academic writing.

Ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can provide the clarity and expertise needed to create a literature
review that stands out. By entrusting this pivotal part of the research process to professionals,
researchers can ensure that their work shines with academic rigor and original insight.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research. The outline of a paper should follow the
following structure. For instance, the sperm whale review could focus on the development of the
harpoon for whale hunting. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and
list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the
process of your literature search. However, if you are writing for practitioners or policy-makers who
are less familiar with the existing research on your topic, then you will need to provide more
background information and include more detailed summaries of each source in your literature
review. Rather, the purpose here is to reflect upon gaps in the current body of literature and to
describe how and in what ways you anticipate your research will begin to fill in some or all of those
gaps. When you’ve answered the main questions and achieved the set goals, sharing your thoughts is
a wise solution, especially if you disagree with something and need to support any points of view.
Students Assignment Help Uk is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. In this
post, we’ll unpack three essential ingredients that need to be woven into your literature review to lay
a rock-solid foundation for your study. But now you can take this task to the best academic writers.
If you are writing the literature review as part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate your central
problem or research question and give a brief summary of the scholarly context. This approach
should only be followed if a clear path of research building on previous research can be identified
and that these trends follow a clear chronological order of development. The most interesting
literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page,
this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). This will give you a better
understanding of the author's argument and what to focus on in your own review. 2. Literature
review as a research methodology: An. However, in the era of artificial intelligence (AI) and big
data, a pressing question arises: can an author’s identity be deduced even from an anonymized paper
(in cases where the authors do not advertise their submitted article on social media). Try to analyze
the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Literature
reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and
methods, as well as gaps in existing research. If you have found some recurring central themes, you
can organise your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Why was this cool or interesting?” Your
response to your labmate should be similar to the content in the Discussion. Some databases to search
for journals and articles include: Your university’s library catalogue Google Scholar Project Muse
(humanities and social sciences) Medline (life sciences and biomedicine) EconLit (economics) Inspec
(physics, engineering and computer science) You can use boolean operators to help narrow down
your search: Read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. An article
from a serious scientific journal would be a good. Does the research use established frameworks or
take an innovative approach. It is often written as part of a dissertation, thesis, research paper, or
proposal. Well, the research gap should serve as the core justification for your study. Describe the
relationship of each work to the others under consideration. The only proofreading tool specialized in
correcting academic writing The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic
texts and by native English editors. It must be proficient in a manner that the readers are able to
synthesize the results into a summary and are aware of everything possible. You dust off a novel and
a book of poetry, settle down in your chair, and get ready to issue a “thumbs up” or “thumbs down”
as you leaf through the pages. “Literature review” done. For instance, in the humanities, authors
might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature
reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their
literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship.
The following sections present these components in a suggested template for you to follow in the
preparation of your research proposal. Historians and theologians tend to focus primarily on its place
within Protestant thinking and its role in the Reformation, generally seeing the earlier Catholic
inheritance as something that began with Augustine and stopped with Aquinas. Be selective Select
only the most important points in each source to highlight in the review. Here are some of the events
we've hosted to show you how much we appreciate our customers and show you some of the fun
new products coming out on the market. Scholars should also highlight the points that the authors
elaborated well and the ones that they did not shed light on. How To Write A Journal Article Review
APA Style talisman-intl.com literature review reviews advantages disadvantages research assessment
based hkust journal learning reference cei build write writers cooperate enjoy professional results.
When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant
sources. Get an originally-written paper according to your instructions. Many errors are made in
referencing, even by top researchers, and so it is important not to perpetuate an error made by
someone else. Literature reviews are used in the introduction and discussion sections of your
manuscripts. Therefore, boosting participation in the group may increase team loyalty and lessen
instances of social loafing. Smithson indicates that boundaries and protocols do not exist for all
artists in the same way. While this can be time consuming, it is the proper way to undertake a
literature review. In other terms, while writing your introduction, you should begin from the broader
perspective and thereafter begin narrowing till you reach your primary objective. In such way, you
will know what outcomes you expect and what you intend to prove whatsoever. The summary effect
size is a value that reflects the average magnitude of the intervention effect for a particular outcome
of interest or, more generally, the strength of a relationship between two variables across all studies
included in the systematic review. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic
Techniques. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below. Does the research use
established frameworks or take an innovative approach. Methodological: A methodological approach
differs from the two above in that the focusing factor usually does not have to do with the content
of the material. If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this. Explain how you plan to go
about conducting your research. The authors identified six main ways which represent “educated
guesses” to be tested against the data in the evaluation studies. Depending on the length of your
literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure
might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically). Missed appointments are a major
cause of inefficiency in healthcare delivery with substantial monetary costs to health systems. These
authors sought to assess whether mobile phone-based appointment reminders delivered through
Short Message Service ( sms ) or Multimedia Messaging Service ( mms ) are effective in improving
rates of patient attendance and reducing overall costs. Make sure you decide on the style of writing
and choose the appropriate structure or tone of writing. The purpose of a literature review is to: -
Demonstrate that you have an understanding of the existing research on your topic; -Identify any
gaps in this research; -Relate your topic to the broader field of study; -Provide a theoretical
framework for your research; -Identify any key researchers in your field. Methodology -- were the
techniques used to identify, gather, and analyze the data appropriate to addressing the research
problem. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and
theses) related to a specific topic or research question. This approach should only be followed if a
clear path of research building on previous research can be identified and that these trends follow a
clear chronological order of development.
An extremely powerful story of a young southern gothic literature has been haunting readers for
centuries. This may be due to the large number of mature students recruited to this post-experience
course. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. In the present context, the notion of rigour refers to
the reliability and validity of the review process described in section 9.2. For one thing, reliability is
related to the reproducibility of the review process and steps, which is facilitated by a
comprehensive documentation of the literature search process, extraction, coding and analysis
performed in the review. Explain where you believe you will find challenges related to data
collection, including access to participants and information. Here are a couple of examples: The
current trend in treatment for congestive heart failure combines surgery and medicine. Scholars
should also highlight the points that the authors elaborated well and the ones that they did not shed
light on. Think of the points you want to make and then include just enough detail about the study
to provide evidence for this. Secondary sources are the ones that have already researched the
primary sources and that provide some new information based on the old one, in particular. Your
literature review should have a strong structure, and this is where you need to think carefully about
your argument. Those papers can be used only as a reference material and should be properly cited
in any academic work. This is because you’ve just finished reading Moby Dick, and you wonder if
that whale’s portrayal is really real. Perhaps, sketch an outline first. ? How to format a literature
review. As the literature review is information dense, it is essential that this section be intelligently
structured to enable your reader to grasp the key arguments underpinning your study. However, the
number of sources referenced in a lit review will vary from one topic or discipline to the other.
Moreover, outlining allows you to learn specific things about your chosen sources. You may also
check out outline templates in Word These templates do not just save time but also provide pointers
along which you can construct your review helping you shape your views and ideas about the work
in a more sample orderly fashion. The Dunning-Kruger effect is the idea that the least skilled people
overestimate their abilities more than anyone else. These excellent free samples are easy to download
and print. By Publication Order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order
demonstrates a more important trend. Our business does NOT deal with ghostwriting services as we
are aware of this being one of the academic misconducts. There is an increasing interest in the visual
aspects of social media. In the sciences, for instance, treatments for medical problems are constantly
changing according to the latest studies. For instance, while your literature review is about migrant
health and inequalities, the main themes would be healthcare policy and cultural perspective. What
you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review. Washington Post more. less.
For off campus access, readers must create and login with an account using a valid email address that
ends in.edu,.gov, or.mil. See. For instance, look into the differences between the results of qualitative
and quantitative research. ?? Literature Review Structure It’s essential that you don’t mix your
literature review structure and include the correct information in each part. Some topics are really
easier to write than the others, so make sure you have sufficient time for ample preparation and
writing process. Generally, when you start to see repetition in the conclusions or recommendations,
you can have confidence that you have covered all of the significant conceptual categories in your
literature review. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination.
Does the author’s work contribute significantly to the overall understanding of the subject matter.
Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems ( ecis
2009); Verona, Italy. 2009. Webster J., Watson R.T. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future:
Writing a literature review. For instance, while your literature review is about migrant health and
inequalities, the main themes would be healthcare policy and cultural perspective. Systematic Review
This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research
question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise
relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that are included in the
review. Why are the outcomes of your proposed research important, and to whom or to what are they
important. To achieve this ambitious objective, the authors performed a bibliometric analysis of
medical informatics citations indexed in medline using publication trends, journal frequencies,
impact factors, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term frequencies, and characteristics of citations.
Well, the research gap should serve as the core justification for your study. The middle or main body
should: organise the literature according to common themes; provide insight into the relation
between your chosen topic and the wider subject area e.g. between obesity in children and obesity in
general; move from a general, wider view of the literature being reviewed to the specific focus of
your research. Popular Publications Qualitative Methods Quantitative Methods Insiderness Using
Non-Textual Elements Limitations of the Study Common Grammar Mistakes Writing Concisely
Avoiding Plagiarism Footnotes or Endnotes. All of this information must be carefully crafted in 150
to 250 words. Secondary sources are the ones that have already researched the primary sources and
that provide some new information based on the old one, in particular. Find all the relevant theories
and foundational research that characterize your work. Usually, it’s unnecessary, but if an abstract is
mentioned in the requirements, consider adding it to the working plan. The amount of phonological
recoding that is carried out depends on orthographic depth (frost, 1994; Literary review templates
are surveys of scholarly sources on a specific subject matter. This helps you remember what you read
and saves time later in the process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. A
good example of a literature review can't fully consist of the words of other people, whose works are
mentioned in the text. Therefore, the literature review will discuss only that research which leads
directly to your own project. University of Toronto; Writing a Literature Review. Any use of this
content for artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), or similar purposes is strictly
prohibited without prior written consent from the website owner. But if you find yourself wanting to
put in more quotes, check with your instructor. The introduction should clearly establish the focus
and purpose of the literature review. If you need to understand the significance of the literature
review, this template would be great for you with its elaborate discussion on what is included in the
literature review and why is an important part of your dissertation. All trademarks, logos and brand
names are the property of their respective owners. These are just random examples, but as you can
see, research gaps can emerge from many different places. Check out these articles for information on
how to provide citations in APA, MLA, Chicago, and Harvard styles. The authors conducted a
comprehensive search on multiple databases to identify eligible reviews and subsequently used a
validated instrument to conduct an in-depth quality appraisal. The truth is that writing a literature
review is not easy. In other words, you want to connect the dots between the different “things” of
interest that you’ll be exploring in your study. The basic research question — what works? — which
is usually associated with systematic reviews changes to: what is it about this intervention that
works, for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects and why.
Generally speaking, one-fifth of the total size of your paper would be enough. Results indicate that
the majority of systematic reviews in this particular area suffer from important methodological flaws
and biases that impair their internal validity and limit their usefulness for clinical and decision-
making purposes. You also provide dialogue about additional sources of information that helped to
frame your action research study. The main focus of an academic research paper is to develop a new
argument, and a research paper is likely to contain a literature review as one of its parts. By applying
the fundamentals of the analysis system, we remain unbiased and propose a valid study before the
readers. Literature Review Conclusion Finally, you need a conclusion that will tie up your review
into a neat little package. An evaluation of the current state of research on the topic, including a
discussion of any gaps in existing knowledge. As you begin writing your research proposal it is
helpful to think of the introduction as a narrative of what it is you want to do, written in one to three
paragraphs. It will farther help you develop your arguments and structure your body paragraphs.
Thematic: If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with
throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different
aspects of the topic. Make sure your research question is not too broad or too narrow. The extracted
data must be presented in a meaningful way that suggests a new contribution to the extant literature
( Jesson et al., 2011 ). Webster and Watson (2002) warn researchers that literature reviews should be
much more than lists of papers and should provide a coherent lens to make sense of extant
knowledge on a given topic. Literary review templates are surveys of scholarly sources on a specific
subject matter. Source: s3.studylib.net Here is an example of a literature review conclusion: Example
of a literature review conclusion. The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and
practice. However, there are several aspects that prove the importance of a conclusion section in. You
can use a combination of the below-discussed techniques. The analytical features of a literature
review might: Give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations,
Trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates, Depending on the situation,
evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant research, or Usually in
the conclusion of a literature review, identify where gaps exist in how a problem has been researched
to date. In other words, the hypothesis, rationale, methods of data collection are first prepared before
the review is conducted so as to minimize any incident of bias. They helped me with my difficult
assignment and provided me with valuable insights that helped me learn more about the subject. The
review should have the ability to evaluate, summarize, and describe previously done research. Open
Google Slides Download PowerPoint If you want to know more about the research process,
methodology, research bias, or statistics, make sure to check out some of our other articles with
explanations and examples. Consider the following issues before writing the literature review:
Clarify If your assignment is not specific about what form your literature review should take, seek
clarification from your professor by asking these questions: 1. While the study focuses on one topic,
the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics, it would still be organized chronologically
reflecting technological developments in media. The objective of this review was to view the trends
in composition studies within the past fifty years and see how commentary on student writing has
transformed and is still transforming. On the same note, we always want to be entertained, which
makes us lose our attention to come up with quality academic papers. This link opens in a new
window Contact a Librarian Ask a Librarian Definition: A literature review is a systematic
examination and synthesis of existing scholarly research on a specific topic or subject. Privacy
Overview Have a language expert improve your writing Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes,
automatically generate references for free. And to do that, you must invest enough time, energy, hard
work and resources to find relevant articles and explore them in detail. Apparently, the other
percentage of the students believes that composing a quality literature review poses the most
significant challenge. When you need help in writing the conclusion in a literature review, hire the
best.

You might also like