Title: Simplify Your Literature Review Process with Expert Assistance

Embarking on a literature review journey can be a daunting task, especially when delving into
complex topics like capital structure. The sheer volume of research papers, articles, and studies
available can overwhelm even the most seasoned scholars. Crafting a comprehensive and cohesive
literature review requires meticulous attention to detail, critical analysis, and a deep understanding of
the subject matter.

The process begins with extensive research to identify relevant sources that contribute to the
understanding of capital structure theories, empirical evidence, and debates within the field. Once the
literature has been gathered, synthesizing and organizing the information in a coherent manner
becomes the next challenge.

Each source must be carefully evaluated for its credibility, relevance, and contribution to the existing
body of knowledge. Analyzing and synthesizing disparate perspectives and findings to identify
common themes, trends, and gaps in the literature demands both time and expertise.

Moreover, ensuring that the literature review adheres to academic standards and guidelines adds
another layer of complexity. Proper citation, formatting, and referencing are essential to maintaining
integrity and academic rigor.

For individuals grappling with the intricacies of crafting a literature review on capital structure, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a solution. Our team of experienced writers specializes in conducting
thorough literature reviews tailored to your specific requirements. With their expertise and
dedication, they simplify the process, saving you time and effort while ensuring the quality and
credibility of your work.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can rest assured that you'll receive a
meticulously researched, well-organized, and academically sound document that meets the highest
standards. Let us alleviate the burden of literature review writing so you can focus on advancing
your research and academic pursuits.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hinder your progress. Order from ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and streamline your academic journey.
It is important to be careful in noting the references already at this stage, so as to avoid
misattributions. Here are some tips to help you structure your literature review effectively: A. In
addition, an outline will make the writing process easier and ensure that you have included all the
important details in your paper. Start with a clear introduction In a proper structure for literature
review, you should begin by providing a brief overview of the research area and the scope of your
review. If you know how to write an essay, then you can structure a literature review efficiently
without any barriers. In this paper we are going to look at these alternative theories for sources of
financing with a specific detail on the: Trade off theory and Pecking order theory. After having read
a review of the literature, a reader should have a rough idea of: the major achievements in the
reviewed field, the main areas of debate, and the outstanding research questions. It also describes the
structure of the material you create and provides the author’s (your) reasons for reviewing the chosen
sources. The practice of citing a source that you haven’t read directly is known as “grandfathering,”
and it’s not allowed. Download Free PDF View PDF Working capital management and shareholders'
wealth creation: evidence from non-financial firms listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
Emmanuel Oseifuah Working capital plays a vital role in shareholders' wealth creation, yet there is a
dearth of empirical studies on the relationship between working capital management and firm value
in the South African economic environment. In addition, future studies should continue to assess the
utility of structural, process, and outcome indicators in WPV quality improvement interventions. It it
crucial as a part of your qualifying exams and the accompanying literature reviews that you elaborate
on the context of the studies being cited. Workplace Violence against Healthcare professionals: a
systematic review. Use key articles to gather additional search terms for your final search strategy.
Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related
terms. You can add to this list if you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.
Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into
subsections. Recapitulate important features of a research study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing
the study's significance and relating it to their own work. The literature review acknowledges the
work of previous researchers, and in so doing, assures the reader that your work has been well
conceived. Data charting process Data charting was facilitated through the Covidence platform
which allowed custom entry fields to be included in charts. The Editing and proofreading page
includes tips on how to do this and strategies for standing back and thinking about your structure
and checking the flow of your argument. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction
and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and
conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself. This helps you remember what
you read and saves time later in the process. This process is summarized in Fig. 2. Study search and
screening process completed with Covidence Characteristics of sources of evidence The
characteristics of the articles that were reviewed for data extraction including the article type,
country of study, study design, and study population are described in Table S1 and Table S2. You
may want to read other literature reviews and get to see the kind of themes you may incorporate in
your review. Consider Whether Your Sources are Current Some disciplines require that you use
information that is as current as possible. Selection of sources of evidence Three reviewers
independently screened all abstracts for articles relevant to workplace violence in healthcare settings.
Outcome indicators involved the impact of care on the patient, worker, and population, such as injury
and post-incident support. A systematic literature review entails the following. Try to analyze the
patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Nurses’
experience with type II workplace violence and underreporting during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Development of the Literature Review Four Stages 1. A mini-review is not necessarily a minor
review: it may well attract more attention from busy readers, although it will inevitably simplify
some issues and leave out some relevant material due to space limitations. Are all the key ideas,
findings and trends presented backed up by multiple sources. You have some chance to do this in
your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to
establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. CSQ made substantial
contributions to the conception and design of the rapid review, the acquisition, analysis and
interpretation of the data for the rapid review. Academic writing The Critical thinking page has
advice on how to be a more critical researcher and a form you can use to help you think and break
down the stages of developing your argument. Various studies adopted quantitative method and
examined by setting hypothesis and also few studies tried to construct models to demonstrate various
relationship between dependent and independent variables. Places the problem into a particular
context that defines the parameters of what is to be investigated. Use Quotes Sparingly Some short
quotes are okay if you want to emphasize a point, or if what an author stated cannot be easily
paraphrased. By using the advanced search form, you will for example be able to specify which
search fields your search terms must be present in. It should answer questions such as: What research
has been done on the topic. Results were limited to those written in the English language. A
literature review allows you to highlight essential ideas and methodologies while also highlighting
gaps in whatever research currently exists because it provides an overview of existing research. An
easier way is just to drop us a message on our Live ChatBox on the bottom right of the page. Search
methods Precise searches were designed by an experienced health sciences librarian in Ovid
databases, Medline, Embase, and Emcare based on two target papers and input from the research
team. Bokhtiar Hasan, PhD The study begins with surveying the capital structure theories ranging
from MM irrelevance to the latest theories. The present study is focused to find an effect of
profitability ratios and market value ratios on market capitalization. One strategy is to review
bibliographies for sources that relate to your interest. DMBs should ensure optimum mix of debt and
equity in their capital structuresto maximize financial performance. Your professor will probably not
expect you to read everything that's available about the topic, but you'll make your job easier if you
first limit the scope of your research problem. Cash Flow Impacts default risk Balance Sheet
Determines Loss in Event of Default (LIED) Liquidity Valuation. This review establishes a
compilation of indicators across all three categories to serve as a starting point for health systems
looking to incorporate comprehensive and actionable quality indicators. Search strategies are
commonly reported in the form of tables. Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than
just summarizing it. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please
take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. If your review follows the chronological method, you
could write about the materials according to when they were published or the time period they cover.
To truly understand the idea of capital structure, you need to take a few moments to read about the
DuPont model to gain an insight into how capital structure represents one of the three components in
determining the rate of return a company will earn on the money its owners have invested in it. You
also need to define the most important key concepts of your research question. I would love to
engage my study under your guidance from the beginning to the end. However, it is likely that most
scientists have not thought in detail about how to approach and carry out a literature review.
A methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in
which these documents are discussed. Workplace Violence against Healthcare professionals: a
systematic review. Excellent information, Clear explanation, and Easy to follow, Many thanks
Derek. Now’s the time to try to improve the linkage from each section to the next, tighten up the
writing to be more concise, trim down word count and sand it down into a more digestible read.
Specialized magazines (for example, business magazines for management students) may be more
useful. Why conduct a literature review, stages of a literature review, lit reviews: an overview
(video), check out these books. A good strategy is to begin by searching the McMaster Library
Catalogue for resources about your chosen topic. The type of information you choose to mention
should relate directly to the research problem, whether it is thematic, methodological, or
chronological. At KI it is common for Master's students to use PubMed and Web of Science when
doing a structured literature review as part of their Master's thesis. Conclusion: Summarize the key
findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance Connect it back to your
primary research question How should I organize my lit review. Once you are familiar with the
dissertation literature review structure, it’s time to delve into some tips for a literature review
dissertation. This includes the purpose of the study, who were the participants, how was the study
conducted, and then ultimately, what was found. Applying descriptive statistics and correlations
analysis, there is no significant relationship between cost of capital to firms return and also debt-
equity ratio to share price. Still, they do provide an excellent beginning point for finding better, more
extensive materials. Amid many determinants of capital structure, this study spots six determinants;
pro. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics could focus on
the development of online political satire. Rule 10: Be Up-to-Date, but Do Not Forget Older Studies
Given the progressive acceleration in the publication of scientific papers, today's reviews of the
literature need awareness not just of the overall direction and achievements of a field of inquiry, but
also of the latest studies, so as not to become out-of-date before they have been published. I mean
how the structure of these two reviews are different. To get the most from the literature review
process, you must keep all four points front of mind as you review the literature (more on this
shortly), or you’ll land up with a wonky foundation. While a single source may only appear once in
an annotated Works Cited list, it may be mentioned multiple times in a Lit Review, depending on its
significance in the area or its relationship to other sources. Do I know of primary and secondary
sources that I can use as a way to find other information. It will increase the readability score as well
as the reader’s eagerness. The outline of a paper should follow the following structure. The above-
discussed tips will, without a doubt, bring you closer to success. Mention gaps in the research and
how your research will fill those gaps. After you have completed your search, you will need to go
through all your search hits and select which articles to include in your review. Also, without the
bird’s eye view that a catalogue provides, you’ll miss connections between various articles, and have
no view of how the research developed over time. When doing and writing a literature review, it is
good practice to: summarise and analyse previous research and theories; identify areas of controversy
and contested claims; highlight any gaps that may exist in research to date. Knowing your argument
upfront can help your reader to understand why you are leading them through your selected bodies
of literature and concepts. However, you can often combine search terms with AND and OR in a
basic search box too, and in that case, you often isolate your different search blocks from each other
by enclosing each block in parentheses.
Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature. You’ll invariably end up wasting
huge amounts of time re-writing and re-shaping, or you’ll just land up with a disjointed, hard-to-
digest mess. A majority of the articles (93%) contained at least 1 quality indicator that possessed the
potential to be operationalized at an organizational level. Sort through other current bibliographies or
literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what your discipline expects. Out tomorrow. It’s really
the same as the daisy model, see TW here and Leave a comment Cancel reply Search for: Follow
Blog via Email Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by
email. These indicators were foundational to successful quality improvement (QI) initiatives within
these settings. Be sure that you start with your General Field first before referring to your
dissertation study. This lays a solid basis for the rest of your paper. Are all the key ideas, findings
and trends presented backed up by multiple sources. To illustrate the difference between reporting
and reviewing, think about television or film review articles. In this way you can create an initial list
of subject-specific resources and review whether the direction you're taking with your literature
review is valid. I know it’s very tempting, but don’t try to kill two birds with one stone and write as
you read. The same point applies to the dichotomy of descriptive vs. Reading at university The
Academic writing page suggests ways to organise and structure information from a range of sources
and how you can develop your argument as you read and write. Have you included and addressed
the question that this literature review tries to answer. This implies that literature reviewers would do
well to keep an eye on electronic lists of papers in press, given that it can take months before these
appear in scientific databases. The formulation of your research question is partly connected to what
kind of literature review you are doing. The 229 quality indicators were categorized using the
Donabedian model, which outlines three major components of human-centred systems: Structural
(84 indicators), Process (121 indicators), and Outcomes (24 indicators). However, it is likely that
most scientists have not thought in detail about how to approach and carry out a literature review.
Thank you for a very useful literature review session. Rule 3: Take Notes While Reading If you read
the papers first, and only afterwards start writing the review, you will need a very good memory to
remember who wrote what, and what your impressions and associations were while reading each
single paper. There are so many issues in contemporary science that you could spend a lifetime of
attending conferences and reading the literature just pondering what to review. Preparing a literature
review is a cyclical process. The above issues may either improve the solvency position of a form or
trigger major financial distress depending on the source of capital. To truly understand the idea of
capital structure, you need to take a few moments to read about the DuPont model to gain an insight
into how capital structure represents one of the three components in determining the rate of return a
company will earn on the money its owners have invested in it. How does the publication contribute
to your understanding of the topic. For example: Look at what results have emerged in qualitative
versus quantitative research Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus
theoretical scholarship Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources
Theoretical A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework. Referencing and
reference management Information Services provide access to Cite them right online which is a
guide to the main referencing systems and tells you how to reference just about any source (EASE
log-in may be required). Subscribe Subscribed Copy shortlink Report this content View post in
Reader Manage subscriptions Collapse this bar ON YOUR 1ST ORDER How to Structure a
Literature Review for a Dissertation By Laura Brown on 26th February 2019 A literature review
structure typically contains three essential parts, Introduction: It provides an overview of the topic or
research question being addressed, and explain the purpose and scope of the literature review. A
well-written literature review provides a thorough understanding of the research field, identifies gaps
in the existing literature, and helps to establish the importance of proposed research project.