Pop Art Neoclassicism

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

http://en.wikipedia.

org/wiki

Pop art is a visual art movement that emerged in the mid 1950s in Britain and in parallel
in the late 1950s in the United States. The coinage of the term Pop Art is often credited to
British art critic/curator, Lawrence Alloway in an essay titled The Arts and the Mass Media,
but this is false - the term that he uses is "popular mass culture" [1] Nevertheless, Alloway
was one of the leading critics to defend mass culture and Pop Art as a legitimate art form.
Pop art is one of the major art movements of the twentieth century. Characterized by
themes and techniques drawn from popular mass culture, such as advertising and comic
books, pop art is widely interpreted as either a reaction to the then-dominant ideas of
abstract expressionism or an expansion upon them. Pop art, like pop music, aimed to
employ images of popular as opposed to elitist culture in art, emphasizing the banal or
kitschy elements of any given culture. Pop art at times targeted a broad audience, and
often claimed to do so.

Much of pop art is considered very academic, as the unconventional organizational


practices used often make it difficult for some to comprehend. Pop art and minimalism are
considered to be the last modern art movements and thus the precursors to postmodern
art, or some of the earliest examples of postmodern art themselves.[2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoclassicism

Neoclassicism

Neoclassicism (sometimes rendered as Neo-Classicism or Neo-classicism) is the


name given to quite distinct movements in the decorative and visual arts, literature,
theatre, music, and architecture that draw upon Western classical art and culture (usually
that of Ancient Greece or Ancient Rome). These movements were dominant during the
mid 18th to the end of the 19th century. This article addresses what these
"neoclassicisms" have in common.

[edit] Overview

What any "neo"-classicism depends on most fundamentally is a consensus about a body of


work that has achieved canonic status (illustration, below). These are the "classics."
Ideally— and neoclassicism is essentially an art of an ideal— an artist, well-schooled and
comfortably familiar with the canon, does not repeat it in lifeless reproductions, but
synthesizes the tradition anew in each work. This sets a high standard, clearly; but though
a neoclassical artist who fails to achieve it may create works that are inane, vacuous or
even mediocre, gaffes of taste and failures of craftsmanship are not commonly
neoclassical failings. Novelty, improvisation, self-expression, and blinding inspiration are
not neoclassical virtues; neoclassicism exhibits perfect control of an idiom. It does not
recreate art forms from the ground up with each new project, as modernism demanded.
"Make it new" was the modernist credo of the poet Ezra Pound.

Speaking and thinking in English, "neoclassicism" in each art implies a particular canon of
"classic" models. Virgil, Raphael, Nicolas Poussin, Haydn. Other cultures have other
canons of classics, however, and a recurring strain of neoclassicism appears to be a
natural expression of a culture at a certain moment in its career, a culture that is highly
self-aware, that is also confident of its own high mainstream tradition, but at the same
time feels the need to regain something that has slipped away: Apollonius of Rhodes is a
1
neoclassic writer; Ming ceramics pay homage to Sung celadon porcelains; Italian 15th
century humanists learn to write a "Roman" hand we call italic (a.k.a. Carolingian); Neo-
Babylonian culture is a neoclassical revival, and in Persia the "classic" religion of
Zoroaster, Zoroastrianism, is revived after centuries, to "re-Persianize" a culture that had
fallen away from its own classic Achaemenean past. Within the direct Western tradition,
the earliest movement motivated by a neoclassicial inspiration is a Roman style that was
first distinguished by the German art historian Friedrich Hauser (Die Neuattische Reliefs
Stuttgart 1889), who identified the style-category he called "Neo-Attic" among sculpture
produced in later Hellenistic circles during the last century or so BCE and in Imperial
Rome; the corpus that Hauser called "Neo-Attic" consists of bas reliefs molded on
decorative vessels and plaques, employing a figural and drapery style that looked for its
canon of "classic" models to late 5th and early 4th century Athens and Attica.

You might also like