Title: An Example of a Short Literature Review

A literature review is a critical analysis of existing literature on a particular topic. It involves

One of the main challenges of writing a literature review is finding relevant sources. With the vast
amount of information available online and in academic databases, identifying the most suitable and
credible sources can be time-consuming and overwhelming. Additionally, synthesizing the
information from different sources and presenting it in a coherent manner can be challenging,
especially for those new to academic writing.

Another difficulty in writing a literature review is maintaining objectivity and avoiding bias. It's
essential to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each source and to present a balanced
view of the existing research. This requires careful analysis and interpretation of the literature, which
can be challenging, especially when dealing with conflicting or contradictory findings.

Furthermore, organizing the literature review in a clear and logical structure can be challenging. It's
essential to group similar studies together, identify key themes and trends, and present the
information in a way that is easy for the reader to follow. Achieving this coherence and clarity
requires careful planning and attention to detail.

Given the complexities involved in writing a literature review, many students and researchers seek
assistance from professional writing services. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert assistance with
literature reviews, providing customized support to meet the specific needs of each client. Our team
of experienced writers has the expertise and skills to conduct comprehensive literature reviews and
deliver high-quality, well-researched papers on time.

By ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and ensure that your literature review
meets the highest academic standards. Our writers will conduct a thorough review of the literature,
critically analyze the existing research, and present the findings in a clear and concise manner. With
our help, you can confidently submit a literature review that demonstrates your understanding of the
topic and makes a valuable contribution to the field.

In conclusion, writing a literature review can be challenging due to the extensive reading, critical
analysis, and synthesis of information required. However, with the assistance of ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔, you can overcome these challenges and produce a high-quality literature review that meets the
expectations of your professors or supervisors. Order now and let us help you succeed in your
academic endeavors.
The clearer and narrower your focus, the deeper you can dive into the topic (which is typically where
the magic lies). When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other
relevant sources. More and more cultural studies scholars are accepting popular media as a subject
worthy of academic consideration. Ethics declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate.
All studies that had multiple therapeutic interventions applied in the study groups or those that did
not fulfill the criteria of a RCT were excluded. The Fig. 1 shows the methodologic development of
the review and the studies excluded. After an overview of similar strategic measuring tools in
industry (Fitzgerald et al. Historical literature reviews focus on examining research throughout a
period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the
literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. If material is not included
in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the
copyright holder. They should arise out of your organizational strategy. However, acupuncture
studies that address the long-term efficacy or effectiveness of acupuncture are required, and they
must have sufficient sample numbers. In the absence of validated risk of bias tools for qualitative
studies, the team should choose a tool according to Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation
Methods Group (CQIMG) guidance together with expediency (according to ease of use, prior
familiarity, etc) ( table 2, item R15). 41 In comparison to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme
checklist which was never designed for use in synthesis, 42 the Cochrane qualitative tool is similarly
easy to use and was designed for QES use. Performance Prism Cranfield: Cranfield School of
Management. In the fields of health sciences and medical informatics, reviews that focus on
examining the range, nature and evolution of a topic area are described by Anderson, Allen,
Peckham, and Goodwin (2008) as mapping reviews. If necessary, as we become more familiar with
the existing literature our research questions will be refined and modified accordingly. Kaplan, R. S.
and Norton, D. P., (1996b), Linking the Balanced Scorecard to. Themes: what questions or concepts
recur across the literature. Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping
you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Meta-analysis
revealed that the Acupuncture group and Laser Acupuncture group had a higher efficacy rate than
the Placebo control group, showing a high efficacy of Acupuncture and Laser Acupuncture group in
the treatment of temporomandibular. Types of Literature Reviews It is important to think of
knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers. Where plentiful reviews already exist, a
team may decide to conduct a review of reviews 5 by including multiple QES within a mega-
synthesis 28 29 ( table 2, item R6). Supplemental materials including additional resources details of
our recommendations and practical examples are provided in online supplemental appendices A and
B. Make a list of keywords Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. It
often includes both qualitative and quantitative studies and may cover a wide range of years. To
accompany tabular and visual summaries, we will also provide a qualitative narrative summary of the
data and how it relates to our research questions. Methods and analysis The scoping review
framework first outlined by Arksey and O’Malley and improved on by Levac et al was used to
guide the development of this scoping review protocol. Scrutinize and question every aspect as your
emphasis is on the originality and profound nature of the research. Federal government websites
often end in.gov or.mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal
government site. Steps in the Literature Review Process Define your research question Determine
inclusion and exclusion criteria Choose databases and search Review Results Synthesize Results
Analyze Results Librarian Support What is a Literature Review. You should be able to answer it
based only on a review of existing publications. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources
on a specific topic.
Frameworks, Warwick: Warwick Business School Research Paper. QR Codes Generate QR Codes
for your digital content. Any changes made as part of the iterative nature of the scoping review will
be documented here. It is a process of reviewing the literature, as well as a form of writing. Neely,
A. D., (1998), Performance Measurement: Why, What and How London. Ask your professor
questions such as: “If you had to read only one book from the 90’s on topic X, what would it be?”
Questions such as this help you to find and determine quickly the most seminal pieces in the field. If
material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission
directly from the copyright holder. After three months of treatment, the active therapeutic laser
acupuncture is responsible for a higher percentage of patients experiencing symptom remission. For
scholars, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the writer in his
or her field. Unlike other review types, critical reviews attempt to take a reflective account of the
research that has been done in a particular area of interest, and assess its credibility by using appraisal
instruments or critical interpretive methods. For tips on the revising and editing process, see our
handout on revising drafts. Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to examine the corpus of
theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. The literature review
might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. Depending
on the nature of your project, you could also present your stance or point of view at this stage.
Further rigorous studies are, however, required to establish beyond doubt whether acupuncture has
therapeutic value for this indication. Researchers conducted a systematic search of meta-analyses and
reviewed several databases, collecting 100 primary studies and five meta-analyses to analyze the
connection between cholesterol and Alzheimer’s disease. Last, Bandara, Miskon, and Fielt (2011)
proposed a structured, predefined and tool-supported method to identify primary studies within a
feasible scope, extract relevant content from identified articles, synthesize and analyze the findings,
and effectively write and present the results of the literature review. You can use a subheading for
each theme, time period, or methodological approach. Is contrary data considered or is certain
pertinent information ignored to prove the author's point. Depending on the situation, the literature
review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant. Qualitative
versus quantitative research Empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the research by
sociological, historical, or cultural sources Theoretical: In many humanities articles, the literature
review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. Literature reviews serve as a guide to a
particular topic: professionals can use literature reviews to keep current on their field; scholars can
determine credibility of the writer in his or her field by analyzing the literature review. The over-
expression of miRNA-206 in peripheral blood of patients with burning mouth syndrome and its
relationship with anxiety and depression. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic
Reviews of Interventions. Within power relations however, (such as between a target setter and the
worker. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach. You can
use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. The theoretical literature
review helps to establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree
the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. Option 3:
Methodological The methodological option is a way of structuring your literature review by the
research methodologies used. My question is that do I put all the variables into a single conceptual
framework or each hypothesis will have it own conceptual framework.
Wrong’s model, the employee’s behaviour is best influenced out of a belief in the. Evaluate and
Select Sources: Filter the source list by selecting studies that are directly relevant and of sufficient
quality, considering factors like credibility, objectivity, accuracy, and validity. For example, if you
are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include
healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access. Literature
review A literature review also includes a critical evaluation of the material; this is why it is called a
literature review rather than a literature report. A flow chart outlining decisions made regarding
study inclusion will be produced using the PRIMSA template. 33 Eligibility criteria Eligibility
criteria were developed using the Population, Concept, Context framework 34 (see table 1 ). Head
Neck Oncol. 2011;3(1):1. Inchingolo F, Tatullo M, Marrelli M, Inchingolo AM, Picciariello V,
Inchingolo AD, et al. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to
the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research
methodology. View all journals Explore content About the journal Publish with us Sign up for alerts
CAREER FEATURE 04 December 2020 Correction 09 December 2020 How to write a superb
literature review Andy Tay is a freelance writer based in Singapore. For example, a literature review
that focuses on continuing research about the emergence of German economic power after the fall of
the Soviet Union. Hose questions will guide the process of writing, so they are important to consider.
Consider Whether Your Sources are Current Some disciplines require that you use information that is
as current as possible. QR Codes Generate QR Codes for your digital content. The basic components
of a literature review include: 5. Selecting studies, extracting data, and assessing risk of bias in a
duplicate manner using two independent reviewers to avoid random or systematic errors in the
process. Analyze and Synthesize: Review each source and summarize the main arguments in one
paragraph (or more, for postgrad). Unlike other reviews, this one has beginning, a middle and an
end. Savignon, S (2000). Communicative language teaching. In M. Byran (ed). Routledge. Given
this, the purpose of a literature review is to: Place each work in the context of its contribution to
understanding the research problem being studied. The Wow-effect can be achieved only if you focus
all your efforts on this task or if you contact professional writers and request for assistance. Writing a
Short Literature Review Write section introduction and conclusion paragraphs. Five key themes were
found in the literature: poor communication can lead to various negative outcomes, discontinuity of
care, compromise of patient safety, patient dissatisfaction, and inefficient use of resources. Review
not just what scholars are saying, but how are they saying it. Understanding the use of balanced
scorecard in the context of state owned ent. Where plentiful reviews already exist, a team may
decide to conduct a review of reviews 5 by including multiple QES within a mega-synthesis 28 29 (
table 2, item R6). You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose
definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as
well). Option 3: Methodological The methodological option is a way of structuring your literature
review by the research methodologies used. Help Center Here you'll find an answer to your
question. If the same thing is being said, just by different people, then this likely demonstrates that
the research problem has hit a conceptual dead end. The Balanced Scorecard has been applied,
initially by private teaching institutions. Studies were included if they examined consumers’
preference for food naturalness and contained empirical data.
Sample 1 (PDF) A brief literature review within a political scientists’ National Science Foundation
Graduate Research Fellowship grant Sample 2 (PDF) A several-page literature review at the
beginning of a published, academic article about philosophy Sample 3 (PDF) A brief literature
review at the beginning of a published, academic article about photochemistry Academic and
Professional Writing This is an accordion element with a series of buttons that open and close related
content panels. For these organisations, rating performance has never consisted of financial. Give
your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this
may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure).
Sitemap case study creative writing presentation problem solving rewiew prompts websites tips.
Analysis of Performance Appraisal Systems on Employee Job Productivity in Pub. Help Center Here
you'll find an answer to your question. You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical
approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research. Give a
thorough overview of each theme, integrating source data, and conclude with a summary of the
current state of knowledge then suggestions for future research based upon your evaluation of what
is lacking in the literature. For example: Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus
quantitative research Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical
scholarship Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources Theoretical A
literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework. The practice of writing essays
also develops critical thinking which is highly needed in any future job. The goal is to more
comprehensively understand a particular phenomenon. This step will help you work out the structure
of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing
knowledge. Keywords used in the data search included: food, naturalness, natural content, and
natural ingredients. Notwithstanding stereotypes, EDs affect individuals from all racial and ethnic
backgrounds. RM aided with the design of the review and drafted the first manuscript. When we say
“literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a
given field. Standards: Description of the way in which you present your information. STRENGTHS
AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY This protocol will ensure transparency in methodology to
reduce the likelihood of reviewing bias. A review organized in this manner would shift between time
periods within each section according to the point being made. A literature review can be a part of a
research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research
methods sections. There’s no use trying to develop a structure before you’ve fully wrapped your
head around the existing research. If the same thing is being said, just by different people, then this
likely demonstrates that the research problem has hit a conceptual dead end. Equally importantly,
you need to have a structure in place before you start writing, or your literature review will most
likely end up a rambling, disjointed mess. Conclusions In conclusion, our systematic review
demonstrate that the evidence for acupuncture as a symptomatic treatment of TMD is limited. Often
this form is used to help establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are
inadequate for explaining new or emerging research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a
theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework. Assessment of the level of employee
performances in some selected.pdf Assessment of the level of employee performances in some
selected.pdf Program Planning And Evaluation Paper Program Planning And Evaluation Paper
Literature Review on Performance Management System Literature Review on Performance
Management System 360-Evaluation Methods 360-Evaluation Methods Understanding the use of
balanced scorecard in the context of state owned ent. Higher Education Quality Council of Britain,
(1995). The efficacy of acupuncture and decompression splints in the treatment of
temporomandibular joint pain-dysfunction syndrome. Systematic Approaches to a Successful
Literature Review. History: The chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that
is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a
chronology.
Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (Pp 137-143). Fink, Arlene.
Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P., (1996b), Linking the Balanced Scorecard
to. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to
the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you: It often helps to remember that the
point of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help
them read the rest of your paper. By publication: Order your sources by publication chronology,
then, only if the order demonstrates a more important trend. Thank you very much for dropping this
kind of write up. It often includes both qualitative and quantitative studies and may cover a wide
range of years. Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body
into subsections. To date, most of the existing literature exploring disordered eating and EDs among
minority ethnic groups has been conducted in the USA. This is called citation tracking and there are
a number of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from
outside of your discipline. Use quotes sparingly Falk and Mills do not use any direct quotes. Issuu
turns PDFs and other files into interactive flipbooks and engaging content for every channel. How
do you evaluate organisations if they do not measure what they do. For the sake of completeness, a
web search using Google Scholar will also be completed. The only proofreading tool specialized in
correcting academic writing - try for free. The conclusion section should draw together the key
findings of your literature review and link them to your research questions. Recently, laser
acupuncture therapy (LAT) has been proposed as an alternative to conventional acupuncture therapy
to eliminate the need for needle insertion. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and
definitions of key concepts. You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or
combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research. I’m doing a research
project topic; stool analysis for parasitic worm (enteric) worm, how do I structure it, thanks. Avoid
wasting precious hours and days by having direct aims and specific questions to raise. On
comparison with the contemporary management tools already outlined, just. In light of the service
industry’s requirements, Warwick University created the. The Creative Commons Public Domain
Dedication waiver ( ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a
credit line to the data. The findings show that acupuncture is short-term helpful for reducing the
severity of TMD pain with muscle origin. They provide detailed and very helpful instructions on how
to conduct each step of the review process. Data to be extracted will include some standard
information about the paper. For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in
migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural
attitudes, legal status, and economic access. Critical Review: This is similar to a narrative review but
requires a robust understanding of both the subject and the existing literature. The stage was set for a
more balanced style of evaluation.