When it comes to writing a literature review methodology, many students and researchers find

themselves facing a daunting task. Crafting a well-structured and comprehensive literature review
requires not only extensive research but also a clear understanding of the methodology involved in
synthesizing and analyzing existing literature.

The process begins with identifying relevant sources and critically evaluating them to determine their
significance to the research topic. This involves sifting through a vast array of scholarly articles,
books, and other publications to extract key insights and arguments.

Once the relevant literature has been identified, the next step is to organize it in a logical and
coherent manner. This often involves categorizing sources based on themes, methodologies, or
theoretical frameworks to identify common trends and gaps in the existing research.

However, synthesizing and analyzing the literature is where many students and researchers struggle
the most. This requires more than just summarizing individual sources; it involves critically
evaluating the existing research to identify patterns, contradictions, and areas for further
investigation.

Furthermore, writing a literature review methodology involves adhering to strict academic

Given the complexity of the task, many students and researchers find themselves overwhelmed and
unsure of where to begin. That's where ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ comes in.

At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we understand the challenges of writing a literature review methodology,

Whether you need assistance with identifying relevant sources, synthesizing existing research, or
organizing your literature review, our experts are here to provide personalized support every step of
the way.

With our professional assistance, you can rest assured that your literature review methodology will
be expertly crafted to showcase your understanding of the existing research and its relevance to your
own study.

Don't let the daunting task of writing a literature review methodology hold you back. Trust the
experts at ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to help you achieve academic success. Order now and take the first
step towards a stellar literature review.
Validity -- are the author's arguments and conclusions convincing. Roughly how many sources would
be appropriate to include? 2. Ethics declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate. Sample
1 (PDF) A brief literature review within a political scientists’ National Science Foundation Graduate
Research Fellowship grant Sample 2 (PDF) A several-page literature review at the beginning of a
published, academic article about philosophy Sample 3 (PDF) A brief literature review at the
beginning of a published, academic article about photochemistry Academic and Professional Writing
This is an accordion element with a series of buttons that open and close related content panels. Then
this Historical Literature Review Example voices your familiarity with the topic. Findings from eight
rct s involving 6,615 participants were pooled into meta-analyses to calculate the magnitude of
effects that mobile text message reminders have on the rate of attendance at healthcare appointments
compared to no reminders and phone call reminders. Communications of the Association for
Information Systems. 2005; 16:1. Kirkevold M. Integrative nursing research — an important strategy
to further the development of nursing science and nursing practice. The data quality links to the
credibility of the study, so it is important to note, especially in this day of predatory journals where
not all articles found are credible. If you are writing a literature review, you can take a sample note
of the following points. Studies will be classified and grouped according to their characteristics. The
writing process is a long one, because not only are you writing to understand your topic, you are
writing to be understood as well. Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint If you want to know
more about the research process, methodology, research bias, or statistics, make sure to check out
some of our other articles with explanations and examples. Dental occlusion, body posture and
temporomandibular disorders: where we are now and where we are heading for. Besides, your
review should contain a reasonable critique, not a summary of every used source. Use quotes
sparingly Falk and Mills do not use any direct quotes. Decide which studies to be included in the
meta-analysis 2. If the literature review is part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate how your
research addresses gaps and contributes new knowledge, or discuss how you have drawn on existing
theories and methods to build a framework for your research. A literature review allows you to
highlight essential ideas and methodologies while also highlighting gaps in whatever research
currently exists because it provides an overview of existing research. An source card or index card or
system card consists of. Equally importantly, you need to have a structure in place before you start
writing, or your literature review will most likely end up a rambling, disjointed mess. Unlike a
dissertation research question, this question has to be answerable without collecting original data.
These authors synthesized published articles that describe the development process of mobile health
( m-health ) interventions for patients’ cancer care self-management. Sample Literature Reviews An
important strategy for learning how to compose literature reviews in your field or within a specific
genre is to locate and analyze representative examples. This approach should only be followed if a
clear path of research building on previous research can be identified and that these trends follow a
clear chronological order of development. Should it be noted down as verbatim or paraphrased. You
do proper evaluation of the discovered sources and your readers should know for sure that academic
sources are valid. When you’ve answered the main questions and achieved the set goals, sharing your
thoughts is a wise solution, especially if you disagree with something and need to support any points
of view. This is the situation when you are asked to investigate the existing state of research on your
issue and then analyze and synthesize your results. Then, the analysis of the abstracts excluded
articles that clearly did not satisfy the eligibility criteria. By Publication Order your sources by
publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a more important trend.
Be sure that you start with your General Field first before referring to your dissertation study.
Initially this table can start to be filled out when gathering literature, and then further filled out when
surveying and critiquing your literature. Thus, you can cite numerous references in the same
paragraph in a typical Lit Review, and you can mention the same reference in more than one
paragraph if the source discusses more than one of the Lit Review’s subtopics. Analyze and
Synthesize: Review each source and summarize the main arguments in one paragraph (or more, for
postgrad). I call these the five literature review objectives. A flow chart outlining decisions made
regarding study inclusion will be produced using the PRIMSA template. 33 Eligibility criteria
Eligibility criteria were developed using the Population, Concept, Context framework 34 (see table 1
). A literature review creates a “landscape” for the reader, giving her or him a full understanding of
the developments in the field. Inclusion and exclusion criteria must be established to help researchers
eliminate studies that are not aligned with the research questions. You might still need to review a
few articles going forward. It is assumed that by mentioning a previous work in the field of study,
that the author has read, evaluated, and assimilated that work into the work at hand. You tend to
overachieve: You’re ready to conquer the literature review process. Step 1: Critique Individual
Articles First, look for shortcomings in each individual article. The scope of your review will depend
on your topic and discipline: in the sciences you usually only review recent literature, but in the
humanities you might take a long historical perspective (for example, to trace how a concept has
changed in meaning over time). These authors synthesized published articles that describe the
development process of mobile health ( m-health ) interventions for patients’ cancer care self-
management. Keywords used in the data search included: food, naturalness, natural content, and
natural ingredients. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of
Interventions. Susan Macicak: Linguistics Imelda Vetter: Dell Medical School For help in other
subject areas, please see the guide to library specialists by subject. Sample 1 (PDF) A brief literature
review within a political scientists’ National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship grant
Sample 2 (PDF) A several-page literature review at the beginning of a published, academic article
about philosophy Sample 3 (PDF) A brief literature review at the beginning of a published, academic
article about photochemistry Academic and Professional Writing This is an accordion element with a
series of buttons that open and close related content panels. Now consider some typical ways of
organizing the sources into a review: Chronological: If your review follows the chronological
method, you could write about the materials above according to when they were published. As you
review an article, fill in the note-taking template’s first four sections, then take a few minutes to
critique the study. View inline Glossary of important terms (alphabetically) As with other resource-
constrained reviews, no one size fits all. One last thing is missing: a link to a great literature chapter
of an journal article (maybe with comments of the different sections in this review chapter). In these
cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing
about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology. One needs
to inform the objective of the review in the initial paragraphs. The Odds Ratio between the two
groups was measured. Abandon this idea. Think of the literature, rather, as a collaborative book-
writing project. University of Toronto; Writing a Literature Review. The CQIMG endorses three
types of synthesis; thematic synthesis, framework synthesis and meta-ethnography ( box 1 ). 43 44
Rapid QES favour descriptive thematic synthesis 45 or framework synthesis, 46 47 except when
theory generation (meta-ethnography 48 49 or analytical thematic synthesis) is a priority ( table 2,
item R17). Literature reviews are written occasionally in the humanities, but mostly in the sciences
and social sciences; in experiment and lab reports, they constitute a section of the paper. Materials
and methods This systematic review includes randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of acupuncture and
laser acupuncture as a treatment for TMD compared to other treatments.
The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses. How can the
existing methodologies inform my own methodology? 3: The Conclusion Section Once you’ve
completed the body section of your literature review using one of the structural approaches we
discussed above, you’ll need to “wrap up” your literature review and pull all the pieces together to
set the direction for the rest of your dissertation or thesis. Like a grocery list, a good template
streamlines your note-taking session. Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on: Academic style Vague sentences
Style consistency See an example To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and
structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read.
However, writing literature reviews will be tedious without the right directives and methodology and
result in irrelevant and incredible outcomes. If you are writing a literature review as a stand-alone
assignment, you will have to choose a focus and develop a central question to direct your search.
This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA)
guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. If the same
authors, books or articles keep appearing in your reading, make sure to seek them out. The Wow-
effect can be achieved only if you focus all your efforts on this task or if you contact professional
writers and request for assistance. Their conclusions should be regarded with greater skepticism than
previously published research. The focus of a literature review is to summarize and synthesize the
arguments and ideas of others without adding new contributions, whereas academic research papers
present and develop new arguments that build upon the previously available body of literature. For
the first part see Slaying the (literature review) beast: Part 1. It should give a theoretical base for the
research and help you (the author) determine the nature of your research. This type of observation is
further dividedinto individual role playing and team role playing. For each publication, ask yourself:
What question or problem is the author addressing. Instead, your review should be not in the form of
a list, but an investigation that represents the opinions and ideas in the field, analyze the literature
bodies, give multiple perspectives of different writers, and indicate the challenges and changes in
prevailing opinions. The main procedures of a systematic review involve: Formulating a review
question and developing a search strategy based on explicit inclusion criteria for the identification of
eligible studies (usually described in the context of a detailed review protocol). This is because
you’ve just finished reading Moby Dick, and you wonder if that whale’s portrayal is really real. For
example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key themes can include the role
of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women. Plenty of information mentioned
years ago remains relevant, so it’s better not to miss it. Use Evidence A literature review section is, in
this sense, just like any other academic research paper. Gradually work to the more specific aspects
you will be looking at. These hacks help you understand how to prepare your literature research
correctly, avoiding numerous common mistakes. This could be the gratification of hard work and
dedication for students who study arts-related courses. What theories have been used to explain,
predict, or understand their research problem. The team seeks to align the review question and the
requirements of the knowledge user with available time and resources. A literature or narrative
review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific topic or
research question. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.
There is no editor. Anyone can contribute a chapter. Structuring your literature review by
methodology can be useful if you are drawing research from a variety of disciplines and are
critiquing different methodologies.
Persuasiveness -- which of the author's theses are most convincing or least convincing. Ask your
professor questions such as: “If you had to read only one book from the 90’s on topic X, what would
it be?” Questions such as this help you to find and determine quickly the most seminal pieces in the
field. Searching the extant literature: The next step consists of searching the literature and making
decisions about the suitability of material to be considered in the review ( Cooper, 1988 ). All
screening will be conducted using the online screening tool Rayyan. There is no editor. Anyone can
contribute a chapter. How does the publication relate to other literature in the field. Thematic:
Thematic reviews of literature are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of
time. Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required for this study. This allows you to
organize your thoughts and discoveries into a logical totality. It’s perfectly natural to adjust as you
engage in the writing process. To make the paragraphs more obvious, use subheadings. New York:
Longman. Jones, Robert, Patrick Bizzaro, and Cynthia Selfe. 1997. The Harcourt Brace Guide to
Writing in the Disciplines. Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by
the author, is not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study. After three months of
treatment, the active therapeutic laser acupuncture is responsible for a higher percentage of patients
experiencing symptom remission. Then, the analysis of the abstracts excluded articles that clearly did
not satisfy the eligibility criteria. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and
talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions,
for literature reviews as well as for any other genre. For example, a sociologist might centre their
research around critiquing specific fieldwork practices. After doing a literature review, you should
know what research has already been done and be able to identify what is unknown within your
topic. And you learned to use those notes to help you find a research gap. Good academic practice
As with any writing task, you will need to review, edit and rewrite sections of your literature review.
Sitemap case study creative writing presentation problem solving rewiew prompts websites tips. All
authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. For example, a book
surveying the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict may include a chapter on the role Egypt has
played in mediating the conflict, or look in the index for the pages where Egypt is mentioned in the
text. Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding exercise in applying
new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem. Such studies will be particularly relevant in
identifying any health disparities in the countries of focus and highlighting possible ways to
overcome these. All authors (AB, IS, JN, CH, FC) have given final approval of the version to be
published. This type of observation is further dividedinto individual role playing and team role
playing. When you base all of your notes from the same template, you create consistency. Writing the
Literature Review: A Practical Guide suggests these steps: Chose a review topic and develop a
research question Locate and organize research sources Select, analyze and annotate sources
Evaluate research articles and other documents Structure and organize the literature review Develop
arguments and supporting claims Synthesize and interpret the literature Put it all together What is the
purpose of writing a literature review. The findings show that acupuncture is short-term helpful for
reducing the severity of TMD pain with muscle origin.