Title: Mastering the Art of Literature Review for Your Database Project

Embarking on a database project is an exciting endeavor, but one crucial aspect often overlooked is
the literature review. Crafting a comprehensive literature review requires more than just summarizing
existing research; it demands meticulous attention to detail, critical analysis, and synthesis of diverse
sources. However, many students and researchers find themselves grappling with this task, unsure of
where to begin or how to structure their review effectively.

The difficulty lies in navigating the vast sea of scholarly articles, books, and other resources to
identify relevant information that informs and enriches your project. It entails sifting through
numerous studies, understanding their methodologies, findings, and implications, and discerning the
gaps in the existing literature that your project aims to address.

Moreover, crafting a literature review requires impeccable writing skills to articulate complex ideas
coherently and persuasively. It's not merely about regurgitating information but presenting a
compelling narrative that highlights the significance of your research within the broader scholarly
conversation.

For those feeling overwhelmed by the daunting task of writing a literature review for their database
project, there is a solution – ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔. Our team of experienced writers specializes in
crafting high-quality literature reviews tailored to your specific project requirements. With their
expertise and dedication, they can help you navigate the intricacies of academic research and produce
a literature review that impresses your readers and advances your project's goals.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time, alleviate stress, and
ensure that your project stands out for all the right reasons. Don't let the challenges of writing a
literature review hinder your progress – let us help you unlock the full potential of your database
project.

Order your literature review from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and take the first step towards
academic success!
Attitudinal determinants of local public health workers’ participation in Hurricane Sandy recovery
activities. Just click on the download link (icon) and after that save the design template on the hard
generate. When searching for a systematic review, recall is the most important aspect, as the
researcher does not want to miss any relevant references. The problem with Google Scholar is that
you don't know what it is indexing, so you don't know exactly what you are searching. Provenance
and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed. For 55 reviews, we determined the
domain. See Fig. 2 for the comparison of the recall of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane
CENTRAL per review for all identified domains. These hacks help you understand how to prepare
your literature research correctly, avoiding numerous common mistakes. Mapping study for health
emergency and disaster risk management The literature review was performed in the English and
Japanese languages using a systematic approach to the literature search. While these two approaches
are often described in a similar way, they are actually quite distinct from each other as the former
report how multiple strategies may be strategically combined in pursuance of an agreed goal, whilst
the latter report how different strategies may be incidentally used in sometimes contrasting settings
in the pursuance of similar goals. A secondary aim is to investigate the current practice of databases
searched for published reviews. The CQIMG endorses three types of synthesis; thematic synthesis,
framework synthesis and meta-ethnography ( box 1 ). 43 44 Rapid QES favour descriptive thematic
synthesis 45 or framework synthesis, 46 47 except when theory generation (meta-ethnography 48 49
or analytical thematic synthesis) is a priority ( table 2, item R17). Subject Specific Databases APA
PsycINFO Over 4.5 million abstracts of peer-reviewed literature in the behavioral and social
sciences. The impact of health information technology on the quality of medical and health care: a
systematic review. Avoid making uncited or overly generalized claims. If you feel a generalization is
warranted, you must follow it up with multiple, specific examples to justify such generalization. The
sum of all these values is the total probability of acceptable recall in the random sample. Keeping the
logical sequence is very important, so having a good writing example will be a serious advantage.
Any article published before 1924 in the United States is available for free and JSTOR also offers
scholarships for independent researchers. The literature review surveys scholarly articles, books, and
other scholarly sources relevant to a particular area of research. We found the associations between
body mass index in adults or at around age 20, waist circumference, weight, and weight gain and
access endometrial cancer, and between body mass index and postmenopausal type I and II
endometrial literature to be highly suggestive owing to substantial heterogeneity access studies and
potential for excess significance bias. This link opens in a new window Contact a Librarian Ask a
Librarian Definition: A literature review is a systematic examination and synthesis of existing
scholarly research on a specific topic or subject. Pathways to effective implementation support over
the last decade. Epistemonikos Epistemonikos is a collaborative, multilingual database of health
evidence. Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach. Of course,
the loss of a minor non-randomized included study that follows the systematic review’s conclusions
would not be as problematic as losing a major included randomized controlled trial with
contradictory results. Nesting is a term that describes organizing search terms inside parentheses.
Researchers at GW should check our subject research guides for suggestions, or check the libguides
community for a guide on your subject. With Library databases you can find out exactly which
journals or other content they index. Although SBHC users in general did not experience
significantly fewer physical symptoms compared with nonusers, female SBHC users experienced
significantly fewer symptoms of physical discomfort at time 2 than did female nonusers. Factors
Playing a Role in What You Choose Factors playing a role in what you choose include: Availability
and Accessibility Relevance of the Literature Volume of Currently Existing Research Your Own
Resources Your Goals, Audience, and Format Some sources are freely available, while others are
only available with a subscription. The team seeks to align the review question and the requirements
of the knowledge user with available time and resources.
WB has received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference. This
competency mapping study included a literature review and a cross-sectional survey, the latter of
which was included because some competency models and curricula may have been missed in the
literature review. Searches are typically organized using the Boolean operators OR or AND. Embase
is considered the second most popular database after MEDLINE. Including attributes, in addition to
knowledge and skills, in the WHE core competency framework was a fundamental change.
Similarly, evidence for an association between adiposity and risk of meningioma was considered
strong when case-control studies were included in the evaluation. Subsequently, a cross-sectional
survey was sent to WHO Health EDRM Research Network members and other recommended
experts in October 2021 to identify competency models and curricula not specified in the literature
search. Analysis: Involves critically evaluating and summarizing key findings, methodologies, and
debates found in academic literature. Implementation strategies to reduce surgical site infections: a
systematic review. The association between body mass index and colon cancer was supported by
strong evidence in men for suggestive evidence in women. SBHCs provide access and eliminate
barriers to mental health reviews. Most records are obtained from the bibliographic databases
PubMed and Embase, with additional records from the published and unpublished sources of
CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. They
can provide a useful overview of the research which has been carried out up until the time that the
book was written. Some articles contain original data from research projects: these are referred to as
primary literature. Fourth, protocols, checklists and bundles are used — most effectively when local
ownership is encouraged. The limitations of the cross-sectional survey included the small sample size
and the issue of selection bias due to the way participants were recruited. Identify search concepts
and terms for each Start by identifying the main concepts of your research question. The authors
state that such a low-tech intervention may be useful in low- and middle-income countries where
paper records are more likely to be the norm. PRISMA-S: Reporting Literature Searches in
Systematic Reviews Section 4.5 Cochrane Handbook - Documenting and reporting the search
process At a minimum, document and report certain elements, such as databases searched, including
name (i.e., Scopus) and platform (i.e. Elsevier), websites, registries, and grey literature searched. This
guidance covers the review process as it relates to synthesis of. Whether a reference is available in a
database is important, but whether the article can be found in a precise search with reasonable recall
is not only impacted by the database’s coverage. For example, “moving forward in a changing
environment” included indicators such as open-mindedness, a learning mindset, flexibility, and
adaptability. Unique results from specialized databases that closely match systematic review topics,
such as PsycINFO for reviews in the fields of behavioral sciences and mental health or CINAHL for
reviews on the topics of nursing or allied health, indicate that specialized databases should be used
additionally when appropriate. RAND Health Reports National Academy of Medicine Publications
Kaiser Family Foundation Robert Wood Johnson Foundation health and medical care data archive
Milbank Memorial Fund reports and issue briefs Also search the resources listed in the CADTH
(2019) Grey Matters checklist. Weight gain may be a better metric than body mass index for
measuring the dynamic nature of adiposity during adulthood, when obesity becomes central and has
more metabolic effects. Searching CINAHL did not add value to clinical questions posed in NICE
guidelines. The Cochrane Handbook recommends searching MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and
Embase for systematic reviews of RCTs. The images or other third party material in this article are
included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. Authors often write about the same topic in varied ways and it is important to add these
terms to your search in order to capture most of the literature. Importantly, we found that many of
these systematic reviews are attuned to, and comment upon the contextual distinctions of pursuing
evidence-informed interventions in health care settings in different economic settings.
Competency models from literature review and survey Among the 12 competency models identified
in the literature review, the majority were from the US. The survey did not generate any additional
competency model or curriculum. Interventions in health care professionals to improve treatment in
children with upper respiratory tract infections. You can document search strategies in word
processing software you are familiar with like Microsoft Word or Excel, or Google Docs or Sheets.
To follow best practices for reporting search strategies, as well as increase reproducibility and
transparency, document various elements of the literature search for your review. The goal of this
paper is to find out the advantages and disadvantages of databases widely employed in cloud
systems and to review the challenges in developing cloud databases. Implementation of evidence-
based, non-pharmacological interventions addressing behavior and psychological symptoms of
dementia: a systematic review focused on implementation strategies. Click to view our example in
PICO format Question: for patients 65 years and older, does an influenza vaccine reduce the future
risk of pneumonia, controlled vocabulary. At the end of the particular day, you save lots of time and
money you would in case you came up with the themes from scratch. Health, Health care, Health
promotion 1163 Words 4 Pages. Value of databases other than MEDLINE for rapid health
technology assessments. Regarding the priorities for research, the respondents’ personal background
and experience could have affected the responses. Current Cochrane guidance informs selection of
tools for quality assessment and of synthesis method. It is a tool for organizing and representing
information in a hierarchical and interconnected manner. Coverage: approx. 100 million items
References: 1.4 billion Access options: institutional subscription only Provider: Clarivate (formerly
Thomson Reuters) PubMed is the number one resource for anyone looking for literature in medicine
or biological sciences. As our research is performed on systematic reviews, the main performance
measure is recall. Many of the articles reporting on previous research concluded that one database
was able to retrieve most included references. GreyNet GreyNet is an organization dedicated to
promoting and facilitating the use of grey literature. Many articles written on this topic have
calculated overall recall of several reviews, instead of the effects on all individual reviews. Often
posters are not published, if they are they may be made available only to other conference registrants
at that meeting or online. The numbers recorded can then be used to populate the PRISMA flow
diagram summarizing the literature search. These database can be an effective complement to your
search. Comparison of bibliographic databases in retrieving information on telemedicine. Finally,
there are epistemological differences across the papers and the reviews. The literature review surveys
scholarly articles, books, and other scholarly sources relevant to a particular area of research. BMC
Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:161. van Enst WA, Scholten RJ, Whiting P, Zwinderman AH, Hooft L.
There were also wide variations in training delivery modalities and evaluation methods. Open access
to 700,000 references to the grey literature. AB led on drafting the work and revising it critically for
important intellectual content. A consensus-based educational framework and competency set for the
discipline of disaster medicine and public health preparedness.