International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.

net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

Science Teacher’s Qualities: The

Basis for a Faculty Sustainability
Program
Rommel P. Laguatana*, Bren D. Abadb, a,bPresident Ramon Magsaysay
State University – San Marcelino San Marcelino, Zambales 2207, Philippines,
Email: a*[email protected]

Science education is a vital element of a country’s progress. Hence,

teachers of Science should be equipped with the indispensable skills to
be able to effectively contribute to the development of functionally-
literate and scientifically-minded citizens. This descriptive survey
research determines the Science teachers’ qualities which served as
baseline information in the crafting of a faculty sustainability program.
A total of 22 junior high school Science teachers purposively chosen
from various public secondary schools of Southern Zambales,
Philippines served as respondents of the study. The results of the
inquiry indicate that the teachers’ professional knowledge,
professional practice and professional attributes are very evident. The
study found out that Science teachers are less active in conducting
action research and sharing the results with their colleagues. The study
recommends that teachers could be encouraged to conduct action
research at least annually in order to solve science pedagogy problems
which would improve the quality of Science teaching in the country.
Moreover, research outputs may be disseminated via fora, research
colloquia and/or learning action cell (LAC). The developed faculty
sustainability program is hereby recommended for implementation and
further validation.

Key words: Faculty sustainability program, Science teaching, Science teachers’

qualities, Zambales, Philippines.

232
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

Introduction

Education is the most important investment of the world. It plays a fundamental role in the
development of humanity, and also to society. Alsharari (2016) concludes that public
education is seen as an essential ingredient of improving life’s quality and economic growth
in many countries all over the world.

Science education acts as a vital part of every ebullient nation because it helps all people to
improve the worth of living in society, and it also becomes substantial in third world
countries. Furthermore, Science education becomes a complex subject framed through the
different fields such as biology, physics, chemistry, astronomy, and earth Science. New
discoveries are being made every day that contribute to Science knowledge (Zuelke, 2008).
Science instruction provides students with the opportunity to know more about living
organisms, non-living matter, energy, space and events that occur in daily lives, to develop
scientific attitudes such as humility, responsibility, curiosity, objectivity and intellectual
honesty, to generalise and discover scientific principles (Alsharari, 2016). McCall and
Conaway (2008) agrees that science education is a complex discipline because it incorporates
knowledge from many other disciplines (Mathematics, the Social Sciences, History, and
Language Arts) and because it is a discipline that is inherently relevant to society.

Teachers play an indispensable role in the successful realisation of every educational policy
initiative, yet in most parts of the world they are poorly motivated and have low identity
(Agezo, 2010; Cogneau, 2003; Lambert, 2004; Ololube, 2006; Rebore, 2001; Sargent &
Hannum, 2005). Teaching is the greatest profession because teachers are not just teaching
children but they have the willing hands to touch every student’s heart. Teachers are not just
teaching individuals how to count and read but teaching them how to live. Teachers let every
individual seek the joy and excitement in learning. Every teacher dabbles in the heart of the
young which inspires them to have hope in dreaming of having a lighter life in the near future
and having knowledge of real life, in the real world. Rogayan (2018) emphasised that
teaching may not be a profitable profession but teaching has been regarded as the noblest
mission, vocation and profession which contributes mainly to the non-material satisfaction of
individuals who are engaged in it. Moreover, teachers play an effervescent role in society,
generally in the instructional environment. In consonance, the Ministry of Education (2013)
state that teachers’ roles in classrooms such as, builders of a warm environment, mentors and
nurturers of students, being role models, and listening and looking for signs of trouble, are
very significant in giving knowledge to learners.

Unfortunately, science education is facing a bigger challenge and difficulty that will affect
the quality of education in the 21st century. There are many constraints facing Science
education in the Philippines schools which include: (a) a shortage of qualified Science

233
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

teachers; (b) a lack of quality textbooks; (c) inadequate equipment; (d) large classes; and (e) a
lack of support from administrators (UP-NISMED, 2011). However, hiring certified teachers
in critical shortage subject areas such as mathematics and Science, and recruiting teachers for
schools located in poor urban areas to teach mathematics or Science, is a difficult task
(Zuelke, 2008). Furthermore, recruiting new Science teachers is a short-term solution to the
teacher shortage because of the low new teacher retention rate, even the most developed
countries like the USA are struggling with the low retention rate of new teachers (Achinstein,
2006).

The concern of teachers’ competencies and credentials, which can guarantee and take the
assurance of their effectiveness, has been the great dispute for not only the Science of
pedagogy but also for those in charge of conscripting schools with proficient and experienced
professionals. In regards in this issue, modern studies have revealed that the way in which a
teacher carries out his work is determined by the union of his personality traits and acquired
knowledge (Liakopoulou, 2011). Teachers’ qualifications highlight that the attitudes,
professional knowledge, professional practices, attributes and the degree that teachers hold
are very important regarding the teaching-learning process.

UP-NISMED (2011) defines content knowledge as the disciplinary conceptual knowledge of

the teacher. Teachers require professional knowledge, which involves all pedagogical aspects
learned throughout his/her teaching and also having creative teaching approaches, teaching
methods, strategies and techniques that will lead to the effective teaching of a Science subject
(UP-NISMED, 2011).

The present study ascertained the different qualities of Science teachers in the 21st century
learning environment. The study served as the basis in developing a faculty sustainability
program which could enhance Science teachers’ professional knowledge, professional
practice and professional attribute. Specifically, the study sought answers to the following
research questions: (1) what is the profile of Science teachers? (2) how can the qualities of
Science teachers be described? and (3) is there a significant relationship among the qualities
of Science teachers?

The results of the inquiry may help Science teachers to become aware of the most essential
qualities which could contribute to the success of the instructional process. This paper will
likewise help students to appreciate Science as a fun learning adventure as provided by an
innovative and enthusiastic Science teacher.

234
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

Science Teacher’s Qualities

Science teacher’s qualities are the basic pedagogical requirements before teaching in the
field; they affect learning within the classroom and influence future student learning (Sanders
& Rivers,1996). They also have the ability to: explain concepts, engage students, summarise
major points, make the class interesting and relevant (McCall & Conaway, 2008), transfer the
content area knowledge to students, develop student creativity, create a well-organised
classroom by planning the lessons ahead and using different techniques to establish and
maintain order in the classroom (Alsharari, 2016).

Science teacher’s qualities have the capability to boost students’ interest, motivate them to
learn, and magistrate all students with a fair judgement, with the use of holistic or analytic
rubrics in their activities and outputs. They use numerous teaching procedures to meet
learner’s learning objectives, and most importantly, apply constructivist philosophy where
students are the centre of the instructional endeavor. Inspirational science teaching occurs
when a teacher is not only enthusiastic about the science topic being taught, but also
understands the topic fully in order to present it in a comprehensible and meaningful way to
each learner (UP-NISMED, 2011).

Twenty-first century science education entails an educator possess professional qualities

broken down into professional knowledge, professional practice and professional attributes,
which will be framed to be effective in teaching. Science teachers’ qualities become a
hindrance not only in the teaching profession but also in the learning process where Wayne
and Youngs (2003) argued that student achievement is deeply dependent upon the teachers’
experience, capacity and preparedness. The study of Liakopoulou (2011) emphasised the
qualifications which are considered essential by teaching professionals to be effective in
pedagogical work are put together based on the results of a national survey carried out in
Greece, to which secondary education teachers of all subjects contributed.

Alsharari (2016) pointed out that teachers who have the ability to establish a strong and
healthy relationship with students, that are understanding of student needs, intellectual
potential and interest, easy to meet or deal with, fair, honest, patient, supportive and caring,
are considered affective qualities of effective teachers. Furthermore, another important
sentimental quality of effective teachers is their ability to use student-centered teaching
methods by shifting the focus of classroom activity from the teacher to the students
(Alsharari, 2016), wherein it becomes a trend in 21st century learning environments.

Another related study was also conducted by Zuelke (2008) who argued that teacher
effectiveness is the key to student achievement. The signs of teacher effectiveness, which is
also referred to as teacher quality, have been described as the years of experience and the

235
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

subject matter qualifications. As national and state orders continue, the practice of high
recompenses of testing and placing pressure upon schools to intensify the rate of student
process and product based outputs, and also for high achievement, there have been few
studies that have explored the relationship between attainment and teacher quality which are
very essential and have a strong rapport.

As this study discusses the science teachers’ qualities, a study conducted by McCall and
Conaway (2008) also lies on the same vein. The research proved that there was an attempt to
hear the student voice concerning secondary science teacher effectiveness and to share that
voice with those who impact the educational process. The purpose of the study was to
accumulate a list of effective qualities of a secondary junior science teacher as determined
through a decisive and intentional sampling of university second semester Biology students
and determine the role of the secondary science teacher in promoting interest and
achievement in science, as well as the teacher’s influence on a student’s choice of a science
career. The current study attempts to evaluate the Science teacher’s effectiveness through
self-evaluation concerning their professional knowledge, professional practice and
professional attributes. The current study will also pilot self-evaluation on the junior high
school Science teachers if their professional knowledge, professional attributes and
professional practices are always observed. McCall & Conaway (2008) listed the following
professional qualities of the secondary science teachers of their study which include: (a)
commitment to inclusion and supporting accountability for at-risk students; (b) commitment
to and protection of student learning; (c) ability to translate theory and research into; (d)
coping with bureaucracy; (e) creating student ownership; (f) engaging parents and caregivers
as partners in student learning and community outreach; (g) not identifying themselves as
saviors but focusing on students in spite of the system; (h) working with colleagues and not in
isolation (collaborative skills); and (i) understanding the imperative of student success,
sharing the organisation’s goals, attending to student’s learning styles and differentiating
instruction.

Stewart (2010) highlighted teacher education knowledge, skills, and dispositions that have
recently become a well-discussed topic among education scholars around the nation, mainly
due to its attention by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE)
over the past few years. Accrediting agencies, have sought to improve the quality of teacher
education programs by examining knowledge, skills, and dispositions as factors in preparing
highly-qualified teachers. The study of knowledge, skills, and dispositions is crucial to
nurturing effective teaching within the classroom. One study about measuring teachers’
qualities was conducted by Fike, Fike and Zhang (2015). This study characterised the
psychometric properties of an instrument, named T-Q, developed to measure perceptions of
teacher qualities most valued by students in the university setting. The validated instrument
will be of interest to faculty who wish to better understand students’ perspectives regarding

236
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

ideal qualities of the faculty. The use of the instrument may help to more broadly inform
faculty and educational researchers regarding approaches to instruction and pedagogy.

As a synopsis, the study of Liakopoulou (2011) and McCall and Conaway (2008) are are very
similar to the present study. McCall and Conaway (2008) focused on the effectiveness of
science teachers to promote interest and achievement in science, as well as the teacher’s
influence on a students’ choice of a science career. While Liakopoulou (2011) revealed that
the qualifications are considered essential by teaching professionals to be effective in
pedagogical and didactic work. The present study will explore three aspects of science
teachers’ qualities which include professional knowledge, professional attributes, and
professional practice.

The studies of Alsharari (2016) and Stewart (2010), are also similar which keened the
qualities of science teachers. Alsharari (2016) aligned the qualities which science teachers
should have, including: the ability to establish a strong and healthy relationship with students,
understanding student needs, intellectual potential and interest, easy to meet or deal with, fair,
honest, patient, supportive and caring. Stewart (2010) concluded that knowledge, skills, and
dispositions are crucial for nurturing effective teaching within the classroom which turns into
a hall way to improve the quality of teacher education programs.

In the study by Fike et al. (2015), they developed a measuring tool for teachers’ qualities.
Meanwhile the study by Wayne and Youngs (2003) and Zuelke (2008) both agreed that
teacher effectiveness lifting its professional qualities are the key to student achievement thus
learners will benefit upon the teachers’ experience, capacity and preparedness. The
effectiveness of science teachers stems mainly from their confidence of the subject matter,
how to teach it, and their endeavor in developing science instruction (UP-NISMED, 2011).
Atilla (2007) contended that having science teachers who know their content helps promote
scientific literacy and foster an understanding and appreciation of science among students of
all ages. Science teacher’s qualities lead to science instruction toward success, a fun learning
journey and an interesting sanctuary which are categorised into three fundamental qualities as
professional knowledge. professional practice and professional attributes.

Framework of the Study

This study was based on Human Capital Theory and Social Learning Theory. Human Capital
Theory was popularised by Gary Becker, an economist from the University of Chicago, and
Jacob Mincer that refers to the stock of knowledge, habits, social and personality attributes
including creativity, embodied in the ability to perform labor so as to produce economic
value. Alternatively, human capital; is a collection of traits – all the knowledge, talents, skills,

237
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

abilities, experience, intelligence, training, judgement and wisdom possessed individually and
collectively by individuals (“Human Capital Theory”, n.d.).

Basic components of the human capital theory provide the foundation for the conceptual
framework explaining a person’s desire to pursue and continue in or leave the teaching
profession (Hollas, 2011). Specifically, this theory focuses on the associations within training
and education, establishment, and the task of finding a new position in relation to returns and
investments (Baptiste, 2001; Sweetland, 1996). A major principle of human capital theory
states that the more skills and knowledge one acquires, the lower one’s likelihood to leave
that occupation (Ehrenberg & Smith, 2003). Decisions related to turnover are primarily
directed by the beginning requirements (e.g., licensing) and prospective benefits of a
potential job change such as a higher salary, improved working conditions, and job
satisfaction (Baptiste, 2001). If the current benefit related to turnover exceeds the costs, the
decision to change jobs is much more likely. The benefit of turnover will be greater with the
following characteristics: (a) greater benefits from the new job; (b) lesser job satisfaction
from the current job; and (c) low instant costs associated with the change (Sweetland, 1996).

The present investigation determined the qualities of a Science teacher as to professional

knowledge, professional practice, and professional attributes in the Philippines context
(Figure 1).

Figure 1. Paradigm of the study.

Professional Knowledge

Faculty
Science Sustainabilit
Teacher’s Professional Practice
y
Qualities Plan

Professional Attributes

Figure 1 shows the paradigm of the study which shows the relationships of the main
variables. Science teachers’ qualities are categorised into three sub aspects include
professional knowledge, professional practice, and professional attribute. The professional
knowledge is a level of confidence in teaching science, explore participants’ confidence in
and about aspects of teaching competencies and content knowledge related to teaching. The

238
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

professional practice outlines the teachers’ achievement for quality learning objective of
science education. Meanwhile, the professional attributes are those characteristics that enable
teachers to embrace change to develop and improve teaching practice as well as sustain
professional growth. After gathering the data from the teacher-respondents, the researcher
ensued to the establishment of the developed program for endorsement to the officials
concerned.

Methodology
Research Design

The descriptive survey research design was used in the study with the use of a survey
questionnaire. The study described the qualities of Science teachers which include their
professional knowledge, professional practice, and professional attributes. A descriptive
survey study was defined as a research method which concerns itself with the present
phenomena in terms of conditions, practices beliefs, processes, relationships or trends
invariably (Salaria, 2012).

Respondents

The respondents of this study were 22 Science teachers from national high schools in
Southern Zambales, Philippines. The sampling technique used in the study was
comprehensive sampling or the universal sampling method. The respondents should meet the
following selection criteria: (1) science teacher for at least 1 year; (2) handling at least 2
science subjects; (3) teaching in a public school; and (4) specialise in science.

Instrument

The Likert scale-type survey questionnaire served as the main instrument in collecting the
data. The survey questionnaire is composed of four parts and has a total of 91 items. The first
part consisted of the demographic profile of the respondents, that is, the profile of the
teachers. The second part assessed the Science teachers’ professional knowledge, the third
part contained the Science teachers’ professional practice and the fourth part comprised of the
Science teachers’ professional knowledge. The concepts were taken from the Framework for
Philippine Science Teacher Education UP-NISMED (2011). The survey questionnaire has
been subjected to construct and content validity. Four experts were tapped to check the
consistency of the items in each variable. The validators include one assessment expert and
three Science experts. There were 10 respondents who participated in the pilot testing of the
tool. They are not part of the study and were identified from select schools in the Schools
Division of Zambales, Department of Education, Philippines.

239
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

Data Gathering Procedure

Prior to the data collection, the researchers developed and validated the research
questionnaire. Afterwards, the researchers secured the necessary permission and approval
from the school principals of the selected school through the endorsement letter from the
College of Education, Arts & Sciences (CEAS) of the President Ramon Magsaysay State
University (PRMSU) – San Marcelino Campus. After securing the approval, the
administration of the survey tools followed. The survey questionnaires were given to the 22
Science teachers. The retrieval of the questionnaires lasted for about two weeks.

Results and Discussion

Profile of the Science teachers

Table 1 shows the demographic profile of the Science teachers.

Table 1: Demographic Profile of the Science Teachers

Profile Frequency Percent
Age
51 - 55 1 4.55
46 - 50 2 9.09
41 - 45 1 4.55
36 - 40 7 31.81
31 - 35 5 22.73
26 - 30 2 9.09
25 & below 4 18.18
Sex
Male 6 27.27
Female 16 72.73
Teaching Position
Teacher I 12 54.55
Teacher II 5 22.73
Teacher III 1 4.55
Master Teacher I 2 9.09
Master Teacher II 2 9.09
Length of Teaching Experience
31 to 35 years 1 4.55
21 to 25 years 1 4.55
16 to 20 years 1 4.55
11 to 15 years 5 22.73
5 to 10 years 7 31.82
Below 5 years 7 31.82
Highest Educational Attainment
MA/MS holder 5 23.81
240
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

BS/AB with master’s units 13 61.90

BS/AB holder 3 14.29
Grade Level Handled
Grade 7 8 20.51
Grade 8 13 33.33
Grade 9 10 25.64
Grade 10 8 20.51
Specialization
Biological Science 8 36.36
Physical Science (Physics) 4 18.18
Physical Science (Chemistry) 1 4.55
General Science 9 40.91

As shown in table 1, most (7 or 31.81%) of the Science teachers are aged 36 to 40 years old
and some (5 or 22.73%) are aged 31 to 35. Only 1 (4.55%) is aged 41 to 45 and 51 to 55. This
implies that most of the Science teachers are in their middle age. Hence, teachers have
already gained experience in dealing with the different aspects of science instruction. There
are more females (16 or 72.73%) compared to males (6 or 27.27%). This corroborates the
findings of previous studies that the teaching profession is dominated by females. In terms of
teaching position, majority of the Science teachers are Teacher I (12 or 54.55%) and some are
Teacher II (5 or 22.73%). This connotes that the majority of the teachers are in the proficient
teachers of the career stage of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST).

The majority of the teacher-respondents are serving for below 5 years (7 or 31.82%) and 5 to
10 years (7 or 31.82%). This imply that majority of the science teachers are still new in the
teaching career. Majority of the teachers held college diploma with master units (13 or
61.90%) which may suggest that majority are pursuing advanced degrees. In terms of grade
level handled, majority of the teachers handles eighth grade (13 or 33.33%), followed by
ninth grade (10 or 25.64%), tenth grade (8 or 20.51%) and seventh grade (8 or 20.51%).

In terms of specialisation, the teachers were distributed in terms of specialist in General

Science major (9 or 40.91%), Biological Science (8 or 36.36%), Physical Science - Physics (4
or 18.18%), and Physical Science - Chemistry (1 or 4.55%). This suggest that majority of the
teachers in science have specialised in general science and biological science.

Science Teachers’ Qualities

As shown in Table 2, the teacher’s qualities are “always” exhibited by the Science teachers as
shown in the overall weighted mean of 3.64 (SD=0.49).

241
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

The teachers “always” exhibit professional knowledge (M= 3.66; SD=0.46). Specifically,
they “always” manifest the knowledge of Science content (M=3.61, SD=0.49), knowledge of
general pedagogy (M=3.64, SD=0.49), pedagogical content knowledge (M=3.71, SD=0.45),
and knowledge of the curriculum structure and materials (M=3.68, SD=0.45). This suggests
that the Science teachers have high level of confidence in teaching science, exploring
participants’ confidence in and about aspects of teaching competencies and content
knowledge related to teaching. Teachers employ multitude of strategies to engage students in
the classroom activities and foster critical thinking which can ignite their interest in the
lesson (Rogayan & Bautista, 2019).

Table 2: Science Teacher’s Qualities

Science Teacher’s Qualities Mean SD QI
A. Professional Knowledge
1. Knowledge of Science content 3.61 0.49 A
2. Knowledge of general pedagogy 3.64 0.49 A
3. Pedagogical content knowledge 3.71 0.45 A
4. Knowledge of the curriculum structure and materials 3.68 0.45 A
Weighted Mean 3.66 0.46 A
B. Professional Practice
1. Designs sound Science teaching and learning experiences 3.66 0.50 A
2. Creates and maintains a safe learning environment 3.67 0.49 A
3. Engages students in scientific investigations 3.60 0.50 A
4. Finds and implements students’ understanding 3.64 0.47 A
5. Builds students’ confidence and capacity 3.63 0.52 A
6. Uses a wide variety of strategies 3.67 0.48 A
Weighted Mean 3.65 0.49 A
C. Professional Attribute
1. Analyses, evaluates, and refines teaching practices 3.70 0.46 A
2. Works with other teachers 3.51 0.60 A
Weighted Mean 3.61 0.53 A
Overall 3.64 0.49 A
Legend: 3.50 - 4.00 Always (A); 2.50-3.49 Sometimes (SO); 1.50-2.49 Seldom (SE); 1.00-
1.49 Never (N)

In terms of professional practice, the Science teachers “always” manifest this quality (M=
3.65; SD=0.49). Specifically, the teachers “always” practice the following: design sound
Science teaching and learning experiences (M=3.66; SD=0.50), create and maintain safe
learning environment (M=3.67; SD=0.49); engage students in scientific investigations
(M=3.60; SD=0.50); find and implement students’ understanding (M=3.64; SD=0.47); build
students’ confidence and capacity (M=3.63; SD=0.52), and use a wide variety of strategies
242
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

(M=3.67; SD=0.48). This may imply that the Science teachers are proficient in outlining their
achievement for quality learning objective of science education. Schools, through the
teachers, should serve as the learning habitats of the students that mold them to be
ambassadors of the environment (Rogayan, & Nebrida, 2019), innovators, catalysts of
change, and technologists.

Science teachers “always” exhibit professional attributes (M=3.61; SD=0.53). They “always”
manifest analysing, evaluating, and refining teaching practices (M=3.70; SD=0.46) and
working with other teachers (M=3.51; SD=0.60). This connotes that the teachers embrace
change to develop and improve teaching practice as well as sustain professional growth.

On the other hand, Science teachers “sometimes” conduct their own research which can solve
challenges encountered in Science teaching. This may suggest that teachers must be given
capacity training to enhance their proficiency in conducting classroom-based action research
(CBAR).

Relationship among the Qualities of Science Teachers

There is a statistically significant positive correlation among the qualities of Science teachers.
Inter-correlations revealed that there is a significant relationship between Science teaching
and learning experiences (r=0.981; p<0.05); curriculum structure and safe learning (r=0.973;
p<0.05); curriculum structure and scientific investigations (r=0.732; p<0.05); curriculum
structure and finds and students’ understanding (r=0.983; p<0.05); curriculum structure and
students’ confidence (r=0.943; p<0.05); curriculum structure and strategies (r=0.967;
p<0.05); curriculum structure and teaching practices (r=0.981; p<0.05); curriculum structure
and works with other teachers (r=0.949; p<0.05).

Furthermore, significant positive relationship between have been noted between Science
teaching, and safe learning environment (r=0.982; p<0.05); sound Science teaching and
students’ understanding (r=0.988; p<0.05); and, Science teaching and teaching practices
(r=0.977; p<0.05). In terms of safe learning, and works with other teachers (r=0.956; p<0.05);
students’ understanding, and students’ confidence (r=0.975; p<0.05); students’
understanding, and teaching practices), (r=0.980; p<0.05);students’ understanding, and
students’ confidence (r=0.975; p<0.05); students’ understanding, and teaching practices),
(r=0.980; p<0.05); students’ confidence and teaching practices (r=0.937; p<0.05); students’
confidence, and works with other teachers (r=0.939; p<0.05); strategies and works with other
teachers (r=0.917; p<0.05); and strategies, and teaching practices (r=0.961; p<0.05).

These findings corroborate the study that the pedagogical content knowledge must not be
ignored in the teaching profession, pedagogical content knowledge was the determiner of

243
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

teaching practice and was the central to teachers’ curriculum decision making at classroom
(Jones, & Moreland, 2015).

Proposed Faculty Sustainability Program

The proposed faculty sustainability program is shown in Table 3. The program is crafted
based from the results of the survey. Contextualisation and localisation of the program may
be done based on the needs of the teachers in the different schools. Further validation of the
program may be conducted to ensure its applicability, usefulness and congruence to the needs
and interest of the faculty of science.

Table 3: Proposed Faculty Sustainability Program

Activities Objectives Persons Duration Output
involved
Science To identify the Preservice 2 Days Reflective
Teacher’s different Science Journal
Symposium: qualities of a Teachers,
Who am I? Science teacher Science Head
in the 21st Teachers,
century learning Science
landscape. Teachers
Principals
Classroom- To write a Preservice 3 Days Research
based Action CBAR proposal Science Proposal
Research containing the Teachers,
(CBAR) basic rudiments Science Head
Seminar research. Teachers,
Science
Teachers
Principals
School-based To disseminate Pre-Service 2 Days Research
Research results of Science manuscript
Colloquium completed and Teachers,
on-going Science Head
researches. Teachers,
Science
Teachers
Principals
Research
Pannelists.

244
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

Teaching the To demonstrate Science Head 3 Days Documentation

teachers; A content and Teachers of innovative
Content and pedagogy pedagogical
pedagogy knowledge in approaches in
seminar science through science
the use of
innovative
pedagogy
approaches.

Periodic To assess the Students Quarterly Evaluation Sheet

Teachers’ science teachers’ Science
Evaluation qualities by Teachers
students, peer Head Teachers
and supervisor.. and School head
Science To build a Science 3 days Reflective
Teacher’s strong sense of Teachers, Head Journal
Formation and camaraderie and Teachers and
Team Building unity among Principals
science teachers
and revisit their
professional and
personal
potentials.

The proposed faculty sustainability plan generally aims to sustain the qualities which are
already exhibited by the Science teachers. The plan targets the teachers’ competencies in
doing classroom-based action research (CBAR), knowing oneself, teachers’ pedagogy and
empowering teachers by developing them personally and professionally.

Conclusion

The study determined the qualities of science teachers based on the three domains:
professional knowledge, professional practice and professional attributes. Based from the
data gathered, the study concludes that a typical Science teacher in the Philippines is a
female, aged 36-40, Teacher I, serving 1 to 10 years and a degree holder with master’s units,
handling Grade 8, and specialised in General Science. The Science teachers always exhibit
qualities in terms of professional knowledge, professional practice and professional attributes.
Based from the specific indicators, the Science teachers sometimes practice conducting their
own research and share the results to other Science teachers. Furthermore, the study found
out that there is a significant positive high relationship among Science teacher’s qualities.

245
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

The study recommends that the teachers could be encouraged to conduct action research at
least annually in order to solve science pedagogy problems towards improving the quality of
Science teaching in the country. Moreover, research outputs may be disseminated via fora,
research colloquia and/or learning action cell (LAC). The developed faculty sustainability
program is hereby recommending implementation and further validation. The schools in the
Department of Education (DepEd) could also revisit its faculty sustainability plan for the
continuous improvement of the faculty. Further, higher education institutions (HEIs) may
further craft policies in enhancing the offering of Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSEd)
major in General Sciences to keep abreast with today’s 21st century Science education which
is parallel and suitable in the K to 12 curricula. The results of the study could be further
validated by involving larger populations and by including other localities. The results of the
investigation could be translated through an infographic to be shared with the DepEd and
school administrators to address the least observed skills among the Science teachers.

Since the study is purely quantitative, future studies may utilise a qualitative approach to
further validate the science teachers’ qualities. Further studies may also be conducted to
validate the results of this study and to explore other variables regarding science teachers’
qualities.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their sincerest thanks to the Schools Division of Zambales,
Department of Education for the approval to conduct the study; to the College of Education,
Arts & Sciences (CEAS) of the President Ramon Magsaysay State University (PRMSU) for
the support and assistance; and to the Science teachers, for the willingness and help.

246
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

REFERENCES

Achinstein, B. (2006). New teacher and mentor political literacy: reading, navigating and
transforming induction contexts. Teacher and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(2),
123-138.

Agezo, K. C. (2010). Why teachers leave teaching: The case of pre-tertiary institutions in
Ghana. International journal of education reform, 19(1), 51-52.

Alsharari, S. (2016). The challenges faced by new science teachers in Saudi Arabia (Doctoral
dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Thesis Global.

Baptiste, I. (2001). Educating lone wolves: Pedagogical implications of human capital theory.
Adult Education Quarterly, 51(3), 184-201.

Cogneau, D. (2003). Colonisation, school and development in Africa: An empirical analysis.

DIAL Working Paper 2003, from http://ideas.repec.org/p/dia/wpaper/dt200301.html

Ehrenberg, R.G., & Smith, R.S. (2003). Modern labor economics: Theory and public policy
(8th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Fike, D.S., Fike, R., & Zhang, S. (2015). Teacher qualities valued by students: A pilot
validation of the teacher qualities (t-q) instrument. Academy of Educational
Leadership Journal, 19(3), 115-127.

Hollas, V.M. (2011). Investigating relationships among Texas high school Science teachers’
working conditions, job satisfaction, and retention (Doctoral Dissertation). Available
from ProQuest Dissertations and UMI Microform.

Human Capital Theory. (n.d.) Wikipedia. Retrieved May 7, 2018 from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_capital

Jones, M. G., & Moreland, A. (2015). Science teacher pedagogical content knowledge.
Theory into Practice, 38(2) 67-73.

Lambert, S. (2004). Teachers pay and conditions: An assessment of recent trends in Africa.
Paper presented at the EFA Global Monitoring Repute Quality Imperative., Paris.

Liakopoulou, M. (2011). The Professional Competence of Teachers: Which qualities,

attitudes, skills and knowledge contribute to a teacher’s effectiveness? International
Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(21), 1-66.

247
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

McCall, M.J., & Conaway, B. J. (2008). Qualities of effective secondary science teachers:
Perspectives of university biology students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/openview/ a6e06679102a3d7e46b7138210c854cb/1?pq-
origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Ministry of Education. (2013). Roles of Teacher in a classroom. Retrieved April 28, 2018
from http://www.education.gov.gy/web/index.php/teachers tips-for-
teaching/item/1603-roles-of-a-teacher-in-the-classroom#gsc.tab=0

Rebore, R. W. (2001). Human resources administration in education: A management

approach (6th ed.). USA: Allyn and Bacon.

Rogayan, D.V., Jr. & Bautista, J.R. (2019). Filipino Students’ Preferred Motivational
Strategies in Science: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Indonesian Research Journal in
Education, 3(2), 358-372.

Rogayan, D.V., Jr. & Nebrida, E.E.D. (2019). Environmental awareness and practices of
Science students: Input for ecological management plan. International Electronic
Journal of Environmental Education, 9(2), 106-119.

Rogayan, D.V., Jr. (2018). Why young Filipino teachers teach? Asia Pacific Higher
Education Research Journal, 5(2), 48-60.

Salaria, N. (2012). Meaning of the term- descriptive survey research method. Internatonal
Journal of Transformation in Business Management, 1(6), 1-7.

Sanders, W.L., & Rivers, J.C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future
student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value Added
Research and Assessment Center.

Sargent, T., & Hannum, E. (2005). Keeping Teachers Happy: Job satisfaction among primary
school teachers in rural northwest China. Comparative Education Review, 49(2), 173-
186.

Stewart, B.B. (2010). University and elementary school perspectives of ideal elementary
science teacher knowledge, skills, and dispositions (Doctoral dissertation). Available
from ProQuest Dissertations and UMI Microform.

Sweetland, S.R. (1996). Human capital theory: Foundations of a field of inquiry. Review of
Educational Research, 66(3), 341-359.

UP-NISMED. (2011). Framework for Philippine science teacher education. Manila,

Philippines: SEI-DOST & UP NISMED.
248
 International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net
Volume 8, Issue 7, 2019

Wayne, J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A
review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122.

Zuelke, L.A. (2008). Relationships among science teacher qualifications, instructional

practices, and student science achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
http://etd.fcla.edu/UF/UFE0023658 /zuelke_l.pdf

249