Midterms Samplex
Midterms Samplex
Midterms Samplex
“A” withdrew US$1,000 in US$100 notes from his dollar account in ABC Bank, but one bill turned
out to be fake. The counterfeiting was done in such a way that even the BSP experts will not be
able to identify the same with ease. The Bank did not act with malice. While using the money in
Bangkok, the fake dollar was noticed and the depositor suffered embarrassment. This case falls
under: Damnum absque injuria.
2. Acting on the letter of credit issued by the National Commercial Bank of Saudi Arabia (NCBSA),
the Philippine Banking Corporation (PBC) transacted with Corporation A. However, both the
head office of PBC and its Makati Branch collected from NCBSA the proceeds of the letters of
credit and NCBSA paid both. Nine years after the payments, NCBSA discovered the “double
payments” and filed an action to recover the duplication in the payment of the proceeds of the
letter of credit. PBC interposed the defense of prescription. Which of the following statement is
NOT correct?
3. In a labor dispute against its employer, Philippine Iron Mines (PIM), the union NAMAWU won an
award of P4 Million. After the judgment became final, NAMAWU attached properties of PIM (in
the form of notice of garnishment), consisting of machinery and equipment mortgaged to PCIB.
PCIB subsequently foreclosed the collateral and purchased the same at the auction sale, and
thereafter made a partial payment to NAMAWU the sum of P600,000. Thereafter, PCIB sold the
same property to Atlas Mining. After the sale and to comply with the notice of garnishment,
Atlas paid NAMAWU P4Million, without the knowledge and consent of PCIB. Subsequently, Atlas
wanted to deduct the amount of P4 Million from the balance of the purchase price due to PCIB.
Which is NOT correct?
a) With respect to the P4 Million, PCIB is the debtor, NAMAWU is the creditor and Atlas
is the third-party payor.
c) Atlas is not entitled to demand reimbursement from PCIB of the full amount it paid to
NAMAWU.
4. “A” opened a foreign currency deposit account with BPI, initially depositing US$100 in cash and
US$16,164 in US Treasury Check. After the lapse of the 30- day clearing period, “A” withdrew
the amount of US$16,244. Several days after the withdrawal, BPI received a notice from its
correspondent bank in the US, that the subject check was dishonored due to amount altered.
Thereafter, BPI immediately applied the sum left in “A’s” other account with the bank, leaving a
balance of P369,600. When “A” refused to pay the balance, BPI sued for collection. Which of the
statements is NOT correct?