AUPPHSMUN-DISEC-Mitigating The Use of Bioweapons and Chemical Weapons in Warfare and Conflict
AUPPHSMUN-DISEC-Mitigating The Use of Bioweapons and Chemical Weapons in Warfare and Conflict
AUPPHSMUN-DISEC-Mitigating The Use of Bioweapons and Chemical Weapons in Warfare and Conflict
Research Report
Forum: DISEC (GA1)
Issue: Mitigating the use of bioweapons and chemical weapons in warfare and
conflict
Introduction
The use of bioweapons and chemical weapons in warfare and conflict is a long standing,
grave concern with far reaching impacts. The use of these lethal weapons has the potential
to cause long lasting environmental effects impacting not only on the immediate victim but
also on the communities and ecosystems in which they are used.
Preventing the use of chemical and biological weapons is a pressing issue, requiring
international agreements including strict laws, non-proliferation, and reinforcement of
multilateral agreements. In order to prevent these weapons from being created, stockpiled,
manufactured, and deployed, strict restrictions must be enforced. Other measures such as
early detection, intelligence gathering, and international cooperation to rapidly address
emerging threats and strengthen security around these weapons are also essential.
Several international agreements have been implied, including the Chemical Weapons
Convention (CWC) and Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). For these conventions to be
successfully implanted and enforced by all nations, continuous vigilance and work are
required.
Bioweapons
The biological agents or toxins deliberately created or modified to harm or kill humans,
animals, or plants, intended for use in warfare or terrorism.
Chemical Weapons
Substances that are specifically designed to cause harm, disable, or kill humans, animals, or
plants through their toxic properties.
Warfare
The engagement in armed conflict between two or more parties, typically involving the use of
weapons and military strategies.
AUPPHSMUN I 2023
Conflict
Proliferation
Disarmament
Non-proliferation
International agreements
General Overview
Chemical weapons have been employed in warfare throughout history, with notable
instances during World War I, causing widespread suffering and casualties. These horrors
led to the creation of international agreements, such as the Geneva Protocol of 1925, aimed
at prohibiting their use. However, enforcement challenges persisted, and chemical weapon
use in conflicts like the Syrian civil war has raised contemporary concerns.
Pathogens and biotechnological innovations are used to create bioweapons, which have
been the focus of study and development. For instance, the 1995 Sarin assault in the Tokyo
underground highlighted the potential for bioweapons to inflict terror. Concerns regarding
adherence to the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) are still being raised by new
biotechnology developments.
Overall, the effort to reduce the use of bioweapons and chemical weapons in war and
conflict is marked by the intricacy of historical context, ongoing obstacles, and regional
variations. In light of recent events and advancements in technology, this issue remains
pertinent despite international legal framework and ongoing disarmament efforts. Requiring
ongoing global attention and concerted measures to mitigate the associated risks
AUPPHSMUN I 2023
OPCW plays a central role in overseeing the implementation of the Chemical Weapons
Convention (CWC). It conducts inspections, verifies destruction of chemical weapons, and
provides technical expertise.
An important international agreement called the BWC aims to outlaw the creation,
manufacture, and purchase of biological weapons. Parties to this treaty take an active role in
discussions and meetings aimed at strengthening its execution.
The BWC is a significant agreement with the purposes of prohibiting the creation, acquisition
and use of biological weapons. Although the BWC has been essential in shaping how the
world has responded to bioweapons, its effectiveness remains a topic of debate. The
widespread ratification of the treaty by most nations, showcases the treaty’s success.
AUPPHSMUN I 2023
However, its limitations including the lack of robust verification mechanism and absence of
punitive measures, have opened the door to potential non-compliance and clandestine
activities
On a similar note, the CWC also holds significant importance, its objective is to prevent the
development and stockpiling of chemical weapons. With the majority of countries supporting
this convention, it has enjoyed substantial success. Nonetheless, challenges still persist,
such as the destruction of chemical weapons, the identification of undeclared stockpiles, and
the emergence of new chemical threats.
While these international agreements have laid the groundwork for reducing the use of
chemical and biological weapons, there remains a pressing need to improve their
enforcement and address involving new threats.
Possible Solutions
Moreover, cutting-edge technology plays a pivotal role in this endeavor. It is crucial to invest
in the development of innovative tools and research for early detection of chemical and
biological threat identification. These technologies can play a pivotal role to enhance global
preparedness and enable quick responses to new threats.
Appendix
Bibliography
➢ UN, “Measure to uphold the authority of the 1925 Geneva Protocol”. https://
documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N12/480/70/PDF/N1248070.pdf?
OpenElement , Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 3 December 2012