BK Rw. Narrative Obtrusion in The Hebrew Bible by Christopher T. Paris, (Emerging Scholars Minneapolis - Fortress Press, 2014), Xiv + 215 Pp.
BK Rw. Narrative Obtrusion in The Hebrew Bible by Christopher T. Paris, (Emerging Scholars Minneapolis - Fortress Press, 2014), Xiv + 215 Pp.
BK Rw. Narrative Obtrusion in The Hebrew Bible by Christopher T. Paris, (Emerging Scholars Minneapolis - Fortress Press, 2014), Xiv + 215 Pp.
George G. Nicol
[email protected]
DOI:10.1163/15685330-12341413-03
In this revised Vanderbilt thesis (directed by Jack Sasson), Paris mainly focuses
on interventions made by the narrator in the interest of influencing the read-
er’s response to the text. He employs the term ‘narrative obtrusion’ for these
interventions, which he defines in his brief ‘Introduction’ as ‘omniscient com-
ment employed by the narrator to address potential issues in the text that will
create problems for the reader, either because of questions the narrator be-
lieves the reader may ask or because of the assumptions the narrator fears the
reader may have’. Yet among those narrative critics (including Alter, Berlin, and
Bar-Efrat) whose work he surveys in chapter one, the term is strikingly absent,
although that does not necessarily mean that the feature has gone unnoticed,
only that it may have been discussed under different terms and perhaps also
with a less strenuous emphasis. That said, given the volume of scholarship that
has focused on the literary interpretation of biblical narrative over the past fifty
years, one questions whether this indicates that the neglect he seeks to correct
is as significant as he believes. Moreover, his profile of the narrator (which he
equates with ‘the narrator’s voice within the text’) who is so completely aware
of the potential questions and actual assumptions of readers in ancient times
is surely open to question. He is also much concerned with ‘reader response’
and he contends that ‘the study of narrative obtrusiveness may help to bring
these (i.e., reader response and narrative critical) approaches closer together’.
In chapter two, Paris builds on his survey of narrative criticism, among other
exegetical methods, to construct his methodological approach to narrative ob-
trusion (regarded as attempts by the narrator to influence reader response),
which he seeks to distinguish from the general omniscience of the narrator.
Although he refers briefly to other texts, Gen. 22.1, the main example he uses
to test his method, is discussed at length. One wonders however whether he
has placed too much weight on the alleged obtrusive force of Gen. 22.1. Against
Paris I would suggest that in putting Abraham to the test God remains in-
scrutable; the test implied by the command God gives might or might not be
rescinded by the counter-command that comes only at the last possible mo-
ment and not before Abraham has plumbed every emotion that might be in-
volved in being forced to kill his son. There is nothing in the introduction of v. 1
or the command that follows to suggest that the story will stop short of Isaac’s
death. The verse does not greatly defend the deity nor, one might hazard, does
it turn the focus from the deity’s motives to Abraham’s obedience. Even if the
test was continued until Isaac was dead, it is not impossible to imagine the
possibility of the story continuing with an even more aged Abraham and Sarah
receiving another son. Aside from that quibble, there is much in this chap-
ter that is descriptive of different sorts of obtrusions, the varieties of informa-
tion they provide, how they relate to God, and how through them the narrator
may anticipate the questions readers might raise or the assumptions they
might make.
Chapter three is devoted to an examination of Judges 14.4, a verse that
‘breaks frame at a key structuring point in the book of Judges’, one in which
Paris discerns both omniscience (v. 4b) and obtrusion (v. 4a). Perhaps that is so,
and the lengthy discussion of the passage exhibits numerous telling observa-
tions as well as a good knowledge of its treatment in the scholarly literature,
yet the earlier failure of Samson’s parents to recognize that the messenger, both
in the initial annunciation and its repetition, was the angel of the Lord tends
to suggest that 14.4a shows them to be consistently dull-witted in relation to
God and his purposes, perhaps weakening its obtrusive nature. In chapter four
Paris’s contention that ‘the narrator employs literary strategies based on the
type of reader envisioned’ plays a prominent part in the discussion of a num-
ber of obtrusions that occur between Joshua and 2 Samuel. A major section of
this chapter is concerned with the part David plays, reading events in such a
way that the narrator exercises control over the narratives, yet he also stumbles
into the gap Nathan leaves in the fiction he represents as a case to the king.
In the fifth chapter, Paris surveys the narrative literature of other ancient
Near Eastern cultures, seeking more examples of narrative obtrusion, finding
it lacking in some and present in others. Thus ‘Hurro-Hittite scribes rely on
their ability to effectively communicate a story to a reader’, in Ugaritic narra-
tive poetry ‘the narrator’s voice is generally absent’, there are ‘many omniscient
comments’ in Mesopotamian literature where intrusions ‘vary in degree’, and
although the Egyptian literature surveyed displays considerable artistry it may
be because their leading characters share so much of their story from a first
person point of view that narrative obtrusion is minimal or entirely absent.
The brief chapter six presents the author’s conclusions; two appen-
dices list ‘Selected Obtrusions from the Hebrew Bible’ and ‘Some More
Obtrusions Not Covered In This Study’ respectively. There follows a substantial
bibliography and a general index, which unfortunately does not comprise bib-
lical citations although it does include the main biblical characters named
throughout the book.
In conclusion, although this study contains much to engage the reader, it
does not escape its origins in a doctoral thesis, not least because some aspects
of the survey of narrative criticism in chapter one seem to provide an unnec-
essary preliminary to the work that follows. At the same time, it might have
strengthened Paris’s argument if he had been able to include a fuller discussion
of some of the other obtrusions indicated so briefly in the second appendix.
In spite of the reservations expressed above, he has made a good case that the
narrator’s device of obtruding into biblical narrative deserves closer attention
than it has yet received, and it may be that other scholars will in time begin to
use the term ‘narrative obtrusion’.
George G. Nicol
[email protected]
DOI:10.1163/15685330-12341413-04
Philip R. Davies, The History of Ancient Israel: A Guide for the Perplexed (London and
New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2015), xiii + 186 pp.
With his wide-ranging knowledge of the subject and his several substantial
contributions to recent debate, few guides could have been better equipped
than the late Philip Davies to steer the perplexed through many of the thorny
issues relating to the history of ancient Israel. The demands this series places
on the author to produce a ‘clear, concise and accessible’ introduction to the
subject are considerable, not least because the last four decades have given
rise to so much debate. Arguably the field remains in such turmoil that a book
so limited in scope could scarcely do justice to the subject, while distilling its
every aspect for the benefit of an audience largely untutored in its complexi-
ties. Nevertheless, aiming to achieve an appropriate balance among the past,
present and future of the subject, and admitting that he is aware of many omis-
sions, Davies has written an introduction that fulfils the remit of the series well
and helpfully nudges the interested reader in the direction of further reading.
For those who already know and admire Davies’ contributions to the subject,
the book will provide no surprises and he sets out his material in admirable
manner. A brief prologue is followed by a chapter that takes a broad but bal-
anced sweep through the critical contributions of the 19th and 20th centuries,