Accounting Information System Quality An
Accounting Information System Quality An
Accounting Information System Quality An
Theoretical framework: This research builds on the work of DeLone and McLean,
Accepted 08 March 2023 regarding information systems success.
Keywords: Design/methodology/approach: The data for this study were collected using a
questionnaire sent to the director of rural banks in the Province of Bali-Indonesia as
Accounting Information Quality; many as 99 participated in this study. The research data were analyzed using the
Accounting Information System structural equation-partial least squares (SEM-PLS) model.
Quality;
Findings: Empirically the results of this study provide empirical evidence that the
Organizational Performance.
accounting information system quality has a significant positive effect on
organizational performance and the accounting information quality. Meanwhile, the
accounting information quality has a significant positive effect on organizational
performance. In addition, the accounting information quality partially mediates the
effect of the accounting information system quality on organizational performance.
Research, Practical & Social implications: The study are expected to provide
insight into the management of rural banks in the Province of Bali-Indonesia,
regarding the important role of managing accounting information system quality and
accounting information quality because they are able to improve the performance of
the bank organizations they lead.
Doi: https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i3.1192
RESUMO
Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo é examinar o papel mediador da qualidade da informação contábil na relação
entre a qualidade do sistema de informação contábil e o desempenho organizacional nos bancos rurais da Província
de Bali-Indonesia.
Estrutura teórica: Esta pesquisa se baseia no trabalho de DeLone e McLean, no que diz respeito ao sucesso
dos sistemas de informação.
Design/metodologia/abordagem: Os dados para este estudo foram coletados usando um questionário enviado
ao diretor de bancos rurais na Província de Bali-Indonesia, dos quais 99 participaram deste estudo. Os dados da
pesquisa foram analisados utilizando o modelo da equação estrutural mínimos quadrados parciais (SEM-PLS).
A
Doctor, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Bali, Indonesia.
E-mail: [email protected] Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-0746
B
Doctor, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Warmadewa, Bali, Indonesia.
E-mail: [email protected] Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4904-4402
Resultados da pesquisa: Empiricamente, os resultados deste estudo fornecem evidências empíricas de que a
qualidade do sistema de informação contábil tem um efeito positivo significativo no desempenho organizacional
e na qualidade da informação contábil. Enquanto isso, a qualidade da informação contábil tem um efeito positivo
significativo sobre o desempenho organizacional. Além disso, a qualidade da informação contábil medeia
parcialmente o efeito da qualidade do sistema de informação contábil sobre o desempenho organizacional.
Pesquisa, implicações práticas e sociais: Espera-se que o estudo forneça uma visão da gestão dos bancos rurais
na Província de Bali-Indonesia, em relação ao importante papel da gestão da qualidade do sistema de informação
contábil e da qualidade da informação contábil, pois eles são capazes de melhorar o desempenho das organizações
bancárias que lideram.
Originalidade/valor: A originalidade desta pesquisa é o modelo de qualidade da informação contábil como
mediador da influência da qualidade do sistema de informação no desempenho organizacional.
RESUMEN
Propósito: El objetivo de este estudio es examinar el papel mediador de la calidad de la información contable en
la relación entre la calidad del sistema de información contable y el rendimiento organizativo en los bancos rurales
de la provincia de Bali-Indonesia.
Marco teórico: Esta investigación se basa en los trabajos de DeLone y McLean, relativos al éxito de los sistemas
de información.
Diseño/metodología/enfoque: Los datos de este estudio se recogieron mediante un cuestionario enviado a los
directores de las cajas rurales de la provincia de Bali-Indonesia, en el que participaron 99 personas. Los datos de
la investigación se analizaron mediante el modelo de ecuaciones estructurales por mínimos cuadrados parciales
(SEM-PLS).
Resultados: Empíricamente, los resultados de este estudio proporcionan pruebas empíricas de que la calidad del
sistema de información contable tiene un efecto positivo significativo en el rendimiento de la organización y en la
calidad de la información contable. Por su parte, la calidad de la información contable tiene un efecto positivo
significativo en el rendimiento de la organización. Además, la calidad de la información contable media
parcialmente el efecto de la calidad del sistema de información contable en el rendimiento organizativo.
Implicaciones sociales, prácticas y de investigación: Se espera que el estudio proporcione información a la
dirección de los bancos rurales de la provincia de Bali-Indonesia, sobre el importante papel de la gestión de la
calidad del sistema de información contable y la calidad de la información contable, ya que son capaces de mejorar
el rendimiento de las organizaciones bancarias que dirigen.
Originalidad/valor: La originalidad de esta investigación es el modelo de papel de la calidad de la información
contable como mediador de la influencia de la calidad del sistema de información en el rendimiento de la
organización.
Palabras clave: Calidad de la Información Contable, Calidad del Sistema de Información Contable, Desempeño
Organizacional.
INTRODUCTION
One of the main concerns of most organizations today is the need to improve their
performance (Ononwor, 2022). Organizational performance reflects the interaction between
organizational behavior and achievements as well as the output value offered by the
organization in the form of goods and services (Richard et al., 2009). Organizational
performance also involves the iterative activities of setting organizational goals, monitoring
progress toward goals, and making adjustments to achieve these goals more effectively and
(Sari, 2022). The Covid-19 pandemic has had an impact on the decline in the economy and the
ability of customers to fulfill their credit obligations, which has had an impact on decreasing
performance achievements (Srinadi & Dwija Putri, 2022). Rural banks have implemented an
accounting information system to process all the financial transaction data. Thus, it is necessary
to examine whether the implementation of accounting information systems and the quality of
accounting information affects organizational performance.
The originality of this study is the role model of mediating the quality of accounting
information in the relationship between the quality of accounting information systems and
organizational performance. This study contributes to the accounting information system
literature by providing empirical evidence of the important role of accounting information
systems and the quality of accounting information in improving organizational performance,
especially in rural banks. In addition, this research also contributes to strengthening the
technology acceptance model.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Technology Acceptance Model
This research is based on the information system success model of DeLone and McLean
(1992) and DeLone and McLean (2003). In this model, six variables related to the success of
an information system are presented: system quality, information quality, use, user satisfaction,
individual impact, and organizational impact (DeLone and McLean, 1992). DeLone and
McLean (2003) revised the model by presenting the system quality, information quality, service
quality, users, user satisfaction, and net benefits. According to Al-Mamary, Shamsuddin and
Hamid (2018), one of the most studied dimensions of information system success is system
quality because system quality shows the size of the information processing system related to
how well hardware and software work together. The quality of information is a measure of the
quality of the information system. Information system research focuses more on the output
quality of the information system, namely, the quality of the information produced by the
system, especially in the form of reports.
Organizational Performance
Organizational performance is the result of the activities and processes of all entities. In
general, there are two organizational performance measures, namely, organizational
productivity and effectiveness, which reflect the final process of all entity activities.
Productivity is a measure of how efficiently employees work, whereas effectiveness is a
measure of how precise organizational goals are (Taşlıyan et al., 2018). According to Ensslin
et al. (2022), evaluating performance is a guide for organizational actors to achieve goals and
maintain or improve organizational performance.
system has a significant impact on organizational performance. Based on this description, the
first hypothesis (H1) tested in this study was:
H1: The quality of the accounting information system has a positive effect on
organizational performance
The Relationship between the Accounting Information Systems Quality and the
Accounting Information Quality
Accounting information plays a very important role in making business decisions
because all decisions will have an impact on finances; therefore, high-quality information is
very helpful in choosing the best alternative for decision-making (Algrari & Ahmed, 2019).
Information is data that has been processed so that it has meaning and is useful to its users
(Laudon & Laudon, 2020). Software quality can be used to determine system quality system
(Gorla et al., 2010). Overall, low-quality accounting software will result in higher costs because
the software is not able to serve the objectives to be achieved, accounting software is designed
not according to quality standards, is prone to errors, has weak security, and is not strong.
Meanwhile, Gorla et al. (2010) stated that software that is of poor quality produces low-quality
information with respect to the dimensions of information content, that is, information that is
less relevant and inaccurate, or incomplete. On the other hand, a flexible accounting
information system can be customized easily and quickly, thereby meeting the rapidly and
efficiently changing information needs of users and leading to the output of relevant and up-to-
date information to users, implying high information quality.
One of the successes of an information system is its output in the form of quality
information from various developed applications. Quality information is a measure of the
output of information systems (Pratiwi, 2021). Al-Mamary et al. (2018) stated that quality
information can be produced from a system that is easy to use and learn. An important role of
the accounting information system in an organization is to produce quality accounting
information. The success of an accounting information system in an organization will be able
increases the relevance of accounting information and reduces the level of uncertainty (Fitriati
et al., 2020).
The above description supports the premise that a quality accounting information
system produces quality information content. An accounting information system that utilizes
user-friendly and modern technology can present information in an easy-to-understand format,
enabling them to effectively use the accounting information system. A properly integrated
accounting information system provides accurate and complete information so that the
information output is useful for supporting daily tasks and relevant for decision-making. The
description above shows that a quality accounting information system leads to quality
information formats and content. Fitriati et al. (2020) prove that the implementation of an
effective information system produces quality accounting information. Similar results were also
reported by Gorla et al., (2010), who provided evidence that the quality of the system affects
the quality of information. Based on this description, the second hypothesis (H2) tested in this
study was:
H2: The quality of accounting information systems has a positive effect on the quality of
accounting information.
(1) the accounting information system used by applying the modern era, (2) nicely included,
(3) easy to use, (4) precise documentation, (5) quick response time for online inquiries, and (6)
short time lag between input and output records for batch processing.
Accounting information quality is measured in two dimensions: information content and
format. The information content dimension is measured by five items: (1) accurate information
output (including screen and print output), (2) complete, (3) concise, (4) useful in supporting
routine work, and (5) relevant for use in decision-making. The information format is measured
by three items, namely: (1) good format and appearance; (2) Can be compared with other
outputs (consistency); (3) consistent and easy to understand, this instrument was developed by
Gorla, Somers and Wong (2010).
Organizational performance is measured by two dimensions, financial performance and
non-financial performance, using an instrument developed by Wang et al. (2014) and Wang et
al. (2016), which was adapted for this study. Financial performance is measured by six (1)
statements including return on investment; (2) return on assets; (3) return on credit; (4) average
profitability; (5) profit growth; and (6) customer growth. Nonfinancial performance is measured
by five statements: (1) customer satisfaction, (2) quality development, (3) ordinary
management, (4) responsiveness, and (5) productivity.
Data Collection
This study used a sample of rural credit banks in the Bali province. Based on
PERBARINDO (https://www.perbarindo.or.id/anggota-bali/), the number of rural banks in
Bali, Indonesia in 2022 is 131. The sample size was calculated using the Slovin formula with
the assumption of a 5% sampling error; therefore, the sample size for this study was 99. We
collected data from directors or department heads who represented companies as respondents.
Data collection was carried out using a questionnaire that was delivered directly to the People's
Credit Bank in Bali, Indonesia via email and WhatsApp. Assuming a response rate of 80%, 123
questionnaires were sent to respondents. The questionnaires were accompanied by a cover letter
explaining the purpose of the research and guaranteeing data confidentiality. Three weeks after
completing the questionnaires, 99 questionnaires were returned, with a response rate of 78%.
The high response rate was because the questionnaire was delivered directly by students who
were doing internships.
We conducted a nonresponse bias test to ensure that there was no response bias. The
Levene's test result is 0.115 with a sig value of 0.712, because the sig value > 0.05, shows no
difference between respondents who return on time and those who are late, this shows there is
no problem with nonresponse bias
Testing the validity of the indicators using convergent and discriminant validity.
According to Fornell and Larcker (1981) convergent validity was tested using three criteria: (1)
all indicators as measurements must be significant and the loading factor must exceed 0.707
(Straub & Gefen, 2004) and (Gefen & Straub, 2005); (2) construct reliability must exceed 0.7,
and (3) the value of the variance extracted (AVE) for each construct must exceed 0.50.
Table 1 shows that the loading factor of the six dimensions exceeded 0.707, with a
significance of p=0.001. The composite reliability of the three constructs exceeded 0.70 (with
the lowest composite value of 0.845). Furthermore, the AVE value for all constructs exceeded
0.50 (minimum value of AVE = 0.731), so it can be said that convergent validity was fulfilled.
Discriminant validity was evaluated using a cross-loading indicator based on (Fornell
& Larcker, 1981) criteria. According to Fornell and Larcker (1981) good discriminant validity
is shown from the AVE square root for each construct, whose value is greater than the
correlation between constructs in the model. Table 2. The criteria for square root average
variance extracted in the diagonal column, which is given a bold letter whose value is greater
than the correlation between latent variables in the same column (above or below); thus,
discriminant validity was fulfilled.
hypothesized relationship. Meanwhile, Chin, Marcolin and Newsted (2003) stated that to be
considered, the standard path coefficient value should be 0.20, ideally above 0.30.
The results of the hypothesized model analysis are shown in Figure 1 and Table 3, which
show that AISQ has a significant positive effect on organizational performance (OrP) β = 0.39,
P < 0.01, thereby supporting the first hypothesis (H1). A significant positive relationship was
also shown between AISQ and AIQ (β = 0.67, P < 0.01), thereby supporting the second
hypothesis (H2). Meanwhile, AIQ also has a significant positive relationship to OrP (β = 0.49,
P < 0.01) thus supporting the third hypothesis (H3).
Figure 2. The results of the direct relationship between AISQ and OrP
The second is to estimate the indirect effect simultaneously with the triangle PLS-SEM
model, namely AISQ → OrP; AISQ → AIQ and AIQ → OrP. The estimation results show
AISQ → OrP = 0.39; p < 0.01; estimated AISQ → AIQ = 0.67; p < 0.01, and estimated AIQ
→ OrP = 0.49; p < 0.01. The test results are shown in Figure 1.
The third is to calculate the variance accounted for (VAF) with the formula for the
indirect effect divided by the total effect. The total influence is direct and indirect. If the VAF
value is above 80%, it indicates that there is full mediation, and if the VAF value is between
20% and 80%, then it can be categorized as partial mediation, whereas if the VAF value is less
than 20%, it can be concluded that there is almost no mediating effect (Hair et al., 2014). The
test results are listed in Table 4.
Table 4. The results of the VAF test of the relationship between AISQ and OrP through AIQ
Indirect effect 0.67 x 0.49 (AISQ → AIQ = 0.67; and AIQ →OrP = 0.49) 0.33
The direct effect of AISQ on OrP 0.70
Total effect (0.33 + 0.70) 1.03
VAF = indirect effect divided by the total influence 0.33/1.03 0,32
Table 4 shows a VAF value of 0.32 (32%) greater than 20%, so it can be concluded that
accounting information quality (AIQ) partially mediates the effect of accounting information
system quality (AISQ) on organizational performance; thus, the fourth hypothesis (H4) is not
rejected.
DISCUSSION
The acceptance of the first hypothesis (H1), which states that the quality of the
accounting information system has a positive effect on organizational performance, indicates
that, first, a flexible system consists of 1) an easy-to-learn accounting information system,
which allows users to not need a long time to understand and use the system, so that the process
becomes faster and more accurate; 2) a system that is only equipped with useful features and
functions, which encourages system users to focus on functions that support banking activities;
and 3) a flexible system to make changes easily. This allows rural banks to adjust the system
according to developments in information technology and the information needs of users, so as
to be able to improve organizational performance.
Second, the use of a sophisticated system by rural banks, namely:1) a modern
accounting information system, 2) well-integrated, 3) user-friendly, 4) good documentation, 5)
short response time for online inquiries, and 6) short time lag between data input and output for
processing batches, all of which can provide good, fast, and accurate service to improve
organizational performance.
The results of this study support those of Jarah and Iskandar, (2019) who proved that
accounting information systems provide support for financial performance, acquire new skills
at work to improve performance, and help reduce organizational costs. Ha, (2020) also proves
that accounting information systems have a positive effect on the operational performance of
small and medium companies in Vietnam. According to Akhter, (2022), banks need to ensure
the use of a quality accounting information system so that operations become effective and
efficient and organizations can develop. Akram and Jarah, (2022) say that the accuracy,
relevance, and reliability of accounting information systems play a very important role in
improving company performance.
Acceptance of the second hypothesis (H2) which states that the quality of the accounting
information system has a positive effect on the quality of accounting information. This indicates
that the flexible and sophisticated accounting information system used by rural banks is capable
of producing accurate information both on print and on screen; the resulting information is
complete; the system produces concise information, so it does not take much time to understand
it; the information generated is very useful in supporting daily work and relevant information
for decision making. Apart from the sophisticated and flexible content aspect of the system, it
is also capable of producing information in good form and appearance, comparable (consistent),
and easy to understand. This will improve the quality of accounting information.
The results of this study are in line with those of Binh et al. (2020) which proves that
the quality of the information system is the main driver of the quality and usefulness of
accounting information. This study also supports Gorla, Somers and Wong (2010), who state
that organizations that use systems with out-of-date hardware and software support cause
information output to be bad. On the contrary, when the quality of the system increases, it will
improve the quality of information.
Acceptance of the third hypothesis (H3), which states that the quality of accounting
information has a positive effect on organizational performance, indicates that with the content
of accounting information and the form of presentation, rural banks in the Province of Bali,
Indonesia are able to increase returns on investment, return on assets, credit returns, average
profitability, and customer growth better than major competitors. In addition to the content and
form of information presented, rural banks in the Province of Bali, Indonesia, are also able to
increase customer satisfaction, improve company quality, improve cost management, increase
responsiveness, and increase productivity so that it becomes better than the main competitors,
thus improving organizational performance.
The test results support those of Alsmady (2022) and Al-Mamary et al. (2018),
providing empirical evidence that the quality of information affects companies' performance.
Dewi et al. (2019) proved that the quality of local government financial information has a
positive effect on financial accountability.
Acceptance of the fourth hypothesis (H4) which states that the quality of accounting
information mediates the influence of the quality of accounting information systems on
organizational performance. People in Bali Province, Indonesia. Thus, rural banks must pay
attention to the quality of accounting information so that the implementation of a quality
accounting information system can improve organizational performance, in this case, the
performance of rural banks in Bali, Indonesia.
CONCLUSION
Based on the previous description, it can be concluded that implementing a quality
accounting information system will improve the organizational performance of rural banks in
the Province of Bali, Indonesia. The implementation of a quality accounting information system
produces such information. Quality accounting information can improve organizational
performance. Finally, accounting information quality can mediate the relationship between
accounting information quality and the organizational performance of rural banks in Bali,
Indonesia. This study supports the developed TAM model (DeLone & McLean 1992; DeLone
& McLean 2003).
The limitations of this study are, first, because of its perceptual nature, the results are
very dependent on the understanding of each respondent to the questions asked, which are
associated with the conditions encountered in the workplace. The two research samples are
limited to rural banks in the province of Bali, Indonesia, and the numbers are relatively small,
which will have an impact on the generalizability. Considering the results of this study, the
suggestion for further research is that future researchers can re-test by adding several mediating
variables, such as knowledge about the system, sharing information, and sharing knowledge.
REFERENCES
Akram, B., & Jarah, F. (2022). The Role Of Accounting Information Systems (AIS) In Increasing
Performance Efficiency (IPE) In Jordanian Companies. 21(1), 1–11.
Al-Mamary, Y. H., Shamsuddin, A., & Hamid, A. N. A. (2018). The relationship between
system quality, information quality, and organizational performance. International Journal of
Knowledge and Research in Management & E-Commerce, 4(3), 7–10.
Algrari, A. Y., & Ahmed, R. M. (2019). The impact of Accounting Information Systems’
Quality on Accounting Information Quality. Journal of Information Technology Management,
11(3), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2019.74301
Anggadini, S. D. (2013). The Accounting Information Quality and The Accounting Information
System Quality Through the Organizational Structure : a Survey of the Baitulmal Wattamwil
(BMT) in West Java Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Management Invention
ISSN (Online, 2(10), 12–17.
Binh, V. T. T., Tran, N. M., Thanh, D. M., & Nga, N. T. H. (2020). Impact of accountant
resource on quality of accounting information system: Evidence from Vietnamese small and
medium enterprises. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 9(1), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.35944/jofrp.2020.9.1.001
Bodnar, G. H., & Hopwood, W. S. (2013). Accounting Information Systems, eleventh Edition.
http://avaxhome.ws/blogs/ChrisRedfield
Chin, W. W., Marcelin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable
modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation
study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2).
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable
modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a monte carlo simulation
study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2),
189–217. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
Dalkılıç, E., Temiz, H., & Özkan, A. (2021). The Effect Of Accounting Information Quality
On Firm Performance And Firm Value: Evidence From Turkey. Journal of Business Academy,
2(3), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.26677/tr1010.2021.853
Daniel, I., Sciences, M., Harcourt, P., Modupeola, B., Sciences, M., & Harcourt, P. (2021).
Quantitative Accounting Information and Financial Performance : the Policy Implication of
Nigerian Insurance Firms. 1(10), 109–120.
DeLone and McLean. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent
Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information
systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Dewi, N. F., Azam, F. S. M., & Yusoff, S. K. M. (2019). Factors influencing the information
quality of local government financial statement and financial accountability. Management
Science Letters, 9(9), 1373–1384. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.5.013
Ensslin, S. R., Rodrigues, K. T., Yoshiura, L. J. M., da Silva, J. C., & Longaray, A. A. (2022).
Organizational Performance Management and the ‘Sustainability’ of the Performance
Evaluation System: A View Guided by the Integrative Review Perspective. Sustainability
(Switzerland), 14(17), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711005
Fitriati, A., Tubastuvi, N., & Anggoro, S. (2020). The Role of AIS Success on Accounting
Information Quality. 4(2), 43–51.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable
Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Ganyam, A. I., & Ivungu, J. A. (2019). Effect of accounting information System on financial
performance of firms: A review of literature. Journal of Business and Management, 21(5), 39–
49. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2105073949
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph:
Tutorial And Annotated Example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems,
16(July). https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01605
Gorla, N., Somers, T. M., & Wong, B. (2010). Organizational impact of system quality,
information quality, and service quality. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 207–
228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.05.001
Ha, V. D. (2020). Impact of organizational culture on the accounting information system and
operational performance of small and medium sized enterprises in Ho Chi Minh City. Journal
of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(2), 301–308.
https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no2.301
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of
Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-
6679190202
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares
structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European
Business Review, 26(2), 106–121.
Hanum, Z., Erlina, Muda, I., Bukit, R., & Muhyarsyah. (2021). The Impact of Accounting
Information System on Organizational Performance through Good University’s Private
Governance in Indonesia. Webology, 18(Special Issue), 1373–1388.
https://doi.org/10.14704/WEB/V18SI04/WEB18204
Hendri, N., Irawan, A., Sa’diah, K., Setiawan, I. W. G. A., Jodi, Hidayat, A., Wardah, S.,
Nasution, S. W. ., & Mujiani, S. (2022). Evaluation of financial management information
system using modification of the Delone & Mclean model during the covid-19 pandemic.
International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(5), 1–20.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i5.e732
IFRS. (2018). Conceptual framework for financial reporting. Business Accounting, March,
112–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-00662-2_5
Ironkwe, U. I., & Nwaiwu, J. N. (2018). Accounting Information System on Financial and non
financial measuress of Comanies in Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Academic
Research, 4(2), 39–55.
Jarah, B. akram falah, & Iskandar, T. B. M. (2019). the Role of Characteristics of Accounting
Information Systems in the Improve the Financial Performance of Jordanian Companies.
International Journal Of All Research Writings, 1(April).
http://www.ijciras.com/Users/ManuScript/ManuScriptDetails/66957c17-7d3a-4b09-8889-
91155788ed1f
Kanakriyah, R. (2016). The effect of using accounting information systems on the quality of
accounting information according to users perspective in Jordan. European Journal of
Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 14(Desember), 58–97.
http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12620012/index.pdf
Ko, D.-G., Kirsch, L. J., & King, W. R. (2005). Antecedents of knowledge transfer from
consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 59–85.
https://doi.org/10.2307/25148668
Kuechler, W. L., Mcleod, A., & Simkin, M. G. (2009). Empirical research why don’t more
students major in IS? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 7(2), 463–488.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2009.00231.x
Makau, S., Lagat, C., & Bonuke, R. (2017). The Role of Information Quality on the
Performance of Hotel Industry in Kenya. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(20), 169.
https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n20p169
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. In McGraw-Hill, Inc. McGraw-
Hill, Inc.
Pratiwi, W. (2021). Effect of Accounting Information Systems, System Quality and Service
Quality on User Satisfaction of Mobile Banking-Based Applications. Journal of Economics,
Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational
performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718–804.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330560
Rosa, D., & Purfini, A. P. (2019). Analysis Effect Quality of Accounting Information Systems
to Support Company Performance. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,
662(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/662/3/032015
Sari, I. N. (2022). BPR Diimpit Keterbatasan dan Gempuran Digitalisasi Perbankan Artikel.
Sedkaoui, S., & Benaichouba, R. (2021). Influence of the Information Quality on the
Organizational Performance in Algerian SMEs : Empirical Evidence Abstract : 06, 615–626.
Srinadi, A. A. A. D., & Dwija Putri, I. G. A. M. A. (2022). Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 Pada
Kinerja Keuangan Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Di Bali. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas
Udayana, 11(06), 667. https://doi.org/10.24843/eeb.2022.v11.i06.p04
Straub, D., & Gefen, D. (2004). Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research.
Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(March).
https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01324
Sunarta, I. N., & Astuti, P. D. (2023). The Influence Quality Accounting Information Systems ,
Quality Accounting Information , and Decision-Making Success. 6(1), 358–366.
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i1-40
Taşlıyan, M., Eren, A. S., & Yücel, D. K. (2018). Defining the Determinants of Organizational
Performance in Turkish Manufacturing Sees. IOSR Journal of Business and Management,
20(5), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2005032635
Verhagen, T., & van Dolen, W. (2009). Online purchase intentions: A multi-channel store
image perspective. Information and Management, 46(2), 77–82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.12.001
Wang, Z., Sharma, P. N., & Cao, J. (2016). From knowledge sharing to firm performance: A
predictive model comparison. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4650–4658.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.055
Wang, Z., Wang, N., & Liang, H. (2014). Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm
performance. Management Decision, 52(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2013-
0064