FPGA and CPLDWhat Is The Difference
FPGA and CPLDWhat Is The Difference
FPGA and CPLDWhat Is The Difference
What is an FPGA?
FPGAs typically contain a large array of logic blocks and rich interconnect resources
to implement very complex digital circuits. The programmable logic blocks and
interconnects configuration is generally specified using a hardware description
language like VHDL or Verilog.
FPGAs are commonly used for digital signal processing, software-defined radio,
aerospace and defense systems, ASIC prototyping, medical imaging, computer vision,
cryptography and other compute-intensive tasks. Leading FPGA vendors
include Xilinx and Intel (formerly Altera).
What is a CPLD?
CPLD-vs.-FPGA-1Download
Although both FPGAs and CPLDs are programmable logic devices, there are some
key differences between the two architectures:
Logic Capacity
The most fundamental difference is logic capacity. FPGAs offer much higher capacity
with hundreds of thousands of logic gates while CPLDs have hundreds to a few
thousand gates.
For implementing complex digital circuits with large gate counts, FPGAs are
preferable. CPLDs are suitable for simple glue logic functions.
The overall architecture and configurability of both devices is very different. FPGAs
have a sea of small logic blocks interconnected by a flexible routing structure. This
allows very complex custom architectures to be realized.
CPLDs have a coarser overall architecture with a small number of larger macrocells
connected by a simple interconnect structure. This limits the range of designs that can
be implemented compared to FPGAs.
FPGAs are configured using hardware description languages like VHDL or Verilog.
This gives designers full control over the architecture and behavior.
CPLDs are programmed using logic equations that define the function of each
macrocell. This is more restrictive than HDL-based design entry.
Performance
The abundant interconnect and separate memory blocks of FPGAs allow much higher
performance for designs with lots of parallelism or requiring high memory bandwidth.
Special DSP slices can accelerate signal processing algorithms.
Cost
Owing to their architectural simplicity, CPLDs tend to be lower cost than FPGAs for
smaller logic capacity needs. High-density FPGAs can be quite expensive.
Clock Management
FPGAs provide sophisticated clock management tiles that allow many clock domains
with frequency synthesis and clock skewing. This is useful for complex synchronous
digital circuits.
Development Tools
The design toolchains for FPGAs and CPLDs are very different. FPGA vendors offer
advanced software for design simulation, timing analysis, layout, placement & routing
and programming.
CPLDs are programmed using logic compilers that are simpler to use but offer less
verification capability.
Summary of Differences
Application Differences
The architectural differences between FPGAs and CPLDs make them suitable for
different classes of applications:
To better illustrate the differences in applications suited for FPGAs and CPLDs, let’s
compare a few example digital systems typically implemented using each type of
programmable logic device.
An FPGA would be an ideal fit for implementing a high-performance router like this.
The flexible logic blocks and DSP slices can implement the data plane forwarding
functions. Large embedded memory blocks provide packet buffering. The I/O blocks
support high-speed interfaces like 100Gbps Ethernet.
The highly parallel nature of video processing maps perfectly to an FPGA. The
dedicated DSP blocks handle pixel processing and motion estimation. The FPGA’s
logic fabric implements generate image pyramids efficiently in hardware. Theobject
detection neural network can also be mapped to programmable logic.
Encryption Accelerator
An encryption accelerator card offloads processing for algorithms like AES, SHA,
RSA from the host CPU. It requires:
FPGAs are widely used for encryption due to their performance benefits over
software. The reconfigurable fabric implements parallel encryption pipelines to
achieve very high throughput. Low-latency access to the encryption engines can also
be guaranteed when using an FPGA compared to software.
LED Controller
An LED controller drives a set of eight RGB LEDs for mood lighting based on user
input. It requires:
A small CPLD with eight to sixteen macrocells can easily implement the glue logic
for the LED controller. The parallel I/O capability enables driving multiple LEDs
simultaneously. Timers implemented in logic generate the PWM waveforms.
Motor Controller
The glue logic and interfacing in the motor controller maps well to a mid-size CPLD.
Macrocells can generate the necessary control signals for enabling and driving each
motor. Additional logic processes the feedback and monitor inputs.
SDRAM Controller
A simple SDRAM controller interfaces to a 64MB SDRAM with a 16-bit data bus.
Key requirements are:
A CPLD can implement the basic timing and control functionality needed for the
SDRAM controller using its predictable timing performance and parallel I/O
capability. More advanced memory controllers are better suited for FPGAs however.
So when should you choose an FPGA over a CPLD, and vice versa? Here are some
guidelines for selecting between the two types of programmable logic:
For the vast majority of complex, high-performance designs FPGAs will be the best
choice. CPLDs excel in simpler glue logic applications where their low cost and small
form factor are beneficial.
Conclusion
FPGAs and CPLDs both provide user-programmable logic capability but are suited
for very different types of applications. FPGAs offer higher logic density, more
flexibility, advanced features and superior performance. CPLDs trade off capability
for a simpler architecture, smaller footprint and lower cost.
Understanding the architectural differences between FPGAs and CPLDs will ensure
the best choice is made when starting a new programmable logic design. Both
families offer unique benefits spanning a wide range of digital systems.
Here are answers to some frequently asked questions about FPGA and CPLD
differences:
Yes, an FPGA can readily implement the same functions as a CPLD owing to its
greater logic density and flexibility. Replacing a CPLD with an FPGA may also allow
you to add more functionality and performance.
Generally yes. FPGA vendors provide advanced toolchains for simulation, synthesis,
place and route, timing analysis and programming. CPLDs use simpler logic
compilers and do not require intensive timing analysis.
FPGAs are programmed using hardware description languages like VHDL or Verilog.
CPLDs are programmed by defining Boolean equations or state machines to specify
logic functions.
Yes, FPGA architectures support selective power down of unused sections. This can
provide substantial energy savings in designs not requiring the full FPGA gate
capacity.
FPGAs offer superior performance thanks to abundant routing, DSP blocks, memory
bandwidth and hard processor cores. CPLD performance is constrained by the
macrocell/interconnect architecture.
Key Takeaways
FPGAs have higher logic density and more advanced features compared to
CPLDs
CPLDs trade off capability for simpler architecture and lower cost
FPGAs are ideal for complex, high-performance applications
CPLDs are well-suited for simple glue logic and interfacing
FPGA design is HDL-based while CPLDs use logic equations
When selecting programmable logic, consider requirements carefully before
choosing between FPGA and CPLD
Related Posts:
2. ASIC vs. ASSP vs. SoC vs. FPGA – What’s the Difference?