Fraud Prevention in Nonprofit Organizations in The United States (New)
Fraud Prevention in Nonprofit Organizations in The United States (New)
Fraud Prevention in Nonprofit Organizations in The United States (New)
Noura Almazrouei
G01348963
PUAD 502
11/21/2023
2
FRAUD PREVENTION
Table of Contents
I. Introduction........................................................................................................................................3
II. Background.......................................................................................................................................4
III. Regulatory Framework....................................................................................................................6
IV. Challenges in Fraud Prevention.......................................................................................................7
V. Fraud Prevention Strategies.............................................................................................................7
1) Technology and Innovation.......................................................................................................8
2) Training and Education..............................................................................................................9
3) Collaboration and Partnerships................................................................................................10
Benefits of Collaboration in Fraud Prevention.........................................................................10
Leveraging Collaborative Networks........................................................................................11
VI. Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................11
Bibliography........................................................................................................................................12
3
FRAUD PREVENTION
I. Introduction
a significant threat to the financial integrity and ethical standing of entities that are otherwise
used for the betterment of society. With more coverage by the media, fraud cases continue to
rise every single day. This negates the missions and the visions that some of these nonprofit
organizations have sworn by. What is even concerning is that employees and staff of these
organizations are the center of these cases. They are aware of the system, thus can easily be
tempted to partake in fraud activities. For that, some nonprofit experts have emphasized the
organizations. This also sheds light on the dynamic role of individuals in preventing
deceptive practices (Bradley, 2014). With that reason, this research aims to provide a better
understanding of the concept of fraud in nonprofits, more so in the human sector. Also, it will
not only highlight the role of fraud prevention in upholding organizational integrity, but it
will also offer modern insights of prevention strategies into the nonprofit sector in the United
States.
causes. It is not easy to create a fraud-free system within nonprofit organizations. That is why
strategies within the nonprofit sector (Bradley, 2014). Aside from understanding the instances
of fraud in any organization, maintaining the integrity of nonprofits is also contingent upon
integrity, because in installing in fraud prevention measures into their systems, the interests
of stakeholders are safeguarded and public trust in the not-for-profit sector is preserved
(Uygur & Napier, 2023). This is why the moral imperative of preventing fraud goes beyond
of the nonprofit sector in the United States. With its vast array of charitable foundations,
advocacy groups, and educational institutions, the nonprofit sector has a stake in addressing
societal challenges in the country. It is often seen that a stakeholder perspective can enrich
the understanding of fraud within this sector, acknowledging the various dynamics that shape
contribute to the development of effective preventive measures, ensuring the sustained impact
II. Background
Since the 1800s, nonprofit organizations, often referred to as the backbone of civil
society, have played a pivotal role in addressing societal needs and fostering positive change.
Be it reducing the number of street homeless children, youths, and elderlies. Be it feeding the
hungry among the poorly kept communities. The country can truly say that the betterment of
the society has been partially fostered by the nonprofit organizations. True to it all, the
diverse benefits and functions of these organizations continue to emerge. They range from
communities (Archambeault, Webber, & Greenlee, 2015). These entities operate with a
5
FRAUD PREVENTION
Despite their altruistic missions, nonprofits are not immune to the scourge of fraud.
Just like the for-profit organizations, different fraud cases continue to emerge within and in
the organizations. In a comparative case study, by Buabeng, it is seen that the study has
delved into the internal controls employed by nonprofit organizations and their impact on
preventing fraud (Buabeng, 2020). Common forms of fraud within nonprofits, as illustrated
by the study, include but are not limited to misappropriation of funds, fraudulent financial
reporting, and conflicts of interest. Understanding these forms has been an ongoing task over
the years with the goals of developing targeted prevention strategies tailored to the unique
challenges faced by nonprofits. The fact that technology takes the appearance of fraud cases
to another level does not begin to cover the alarming rate of these cases.
prevalence are crucial. An analysis of press reports spanning 2008-2011 has suggested that
fraud and corruption incidents within US nonprofit entities during that period was extremely
high (Archambeault, Webber, & Greenlee, 2015). The study also sheds light on the frequency
and nature of reported cases, offering valuable context to the challenges faced by nonprofits
in maintaining financial integrity. For instance, one major reason that sent more employees to
prison due to fraud cases, was the global financial crisis that the country was undergoing
during that time. Statistics from this analysis reveal a far from subtle state of affairs where
nonprofits grapple with various fraud-related challenges, prompting the need for proactive
measures to fortify their financial and ethical foundations (Archambeault, Webber, &
Greenlee, 2015). By delving into the past and present landscape of nonprofit organizations,
their susceptibility to fraud, and the prevalence of such incidents, it is important to provide a
6
FRAUD PREVENTION
comprehensive understanding of the challenges these entities face, setting the stage for
effective fraud prevention strategies into the present going to the future.
The accountability and integrity of nonprofit organizations in the United States are
elaborately woven into a complex web of regulations and legal frameworks. There are legal
underpinnings that define the accountability of nonprofit organizations and those who control
them, providing valuable insights into the intricate legal landscape shaping these entities
(Chisolm, 1995). Nonprofits are subject to a myriad of federal and state laws that dictate their
formation, operation, and reporting obligations. So, government agencies play a pivotal role
in ensuring the adherence of nonprofits to established legal standards. The Internal Revenue
Service (IRS), in particular, plays a central role in granting and monitoring tax-exempt status,
imposing regulations on financial reporting, and scrutinizing compliance with nonprofit laws
(Fremont-Smith, 2008). These legal frameworks and government interventions are designed
They encompass a range of issues, from organizational structure to financial disclosure, with
the aim of ensuring that nonprofits operate in the public interest and fulfill their intended
missions.
Compliance with these regulations can be intricate, and the oversight process may encounter
challenges and staying abreast of regulatory developments are essential for nonprofit
organizations aiming to fortify their fraud prevention measures. By navigating the intricate
legal frameworks governing nonprofits and exploring the role of government agencies in
7
FRAUD PREVENTION
oversight, it is possible to elucidate the regulatory foundations that shape the operating
Nonprofit organizations, driven by their altruistic missions, are not immune to the
effective fraud prevention within the nonprofit sector. Internal factors, such as organizational
size, resource constraints, and the complexity of operations, contribute to the intricate
landscape nonprofits navigate in their efforts to combat fraud (Buabeng, 2020). Still in his
(Buabeng, 2020). Resource limitations, insufficient internal controls, and a lack of awareness
conditions, and the evolving landscape of technology (Holloway, 2023). Nonprofit leaders
face obstacles in implementing robust internal controls due to external pressures, highlighting
the need for adaptability and proactive strategies in the face of changing circumstances
both internally and externally, recognizing these challenges is a crucial step toward
formulating targeted and effective fraud prevention strategies within the nonprofit sector.
approach, Biegelman and Bartow's (2012) "Executive Roadmap to Fraud Prevention and
8
FRAUD PREVENTION
organizations (Biegelman & Bartow, 2012). Internal controls, well-defined policies, and a
nonprofits. The authors have emphasized the pivotal role of internal controls in creating a
robust framework for preventing and detecting fraudulent activities (Biegelman & Bartow,
2012). Clear policies regarding financial transactions, conflict of interest, and ethical
behavior serve as preventative measures by establishing guidelines for staff and leadership.
insights for nonprofits. Illustrative case studies can showcase the practical application of
nonprofit fraud and Biegelman and Bartow's (2012) executive roadmap, they have
effectiveness of the outlined strategies in diverse organizational settings. These case studies
fraud prevention can yield success within the nonprofit sector. By synthesizing insights from
risk mitigation strategies and executive roadmap, there is more than a possibility to equip
nonprofits with actionable best practices for preventing fraud such as integration of
considerations.
turning to technology as a formidable ally, and with good reasons. Some have utilized
artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, as well as data analytics. Speaking of data
analytics, the application of data analytics in detecting and preventing fraud is quite
9
FRAUD PREVENTION
promising. This sheds light on the transformative role of technology in this context
(Bănărescu, 2015). The integration of innovative technological solutions has the potential to
fortify the defenses of nonprofits against fraudulent activities. For instance, predictive and
prescriptive data analytics in systems of nonprofits can track unknown transactions that is
It is true that data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) stand at the forefront of
technological tools that can be harnessed for effective fraud prevention. Aside from the
predictive and prescriptive data analytics, there also the application of unstructured data
analytics, emphasizing its impact on customer acquisition, retention, and fraud detection and
prevention (Isson, 2018). The ability of these tools to process vast datasets, identify patterns,
and detect anomalies provides nonprofits with a proactive approach to fraud prevention.
From these instances of technology, it is seen that data analytics can empower
fraudulent activities, and strengthen overall risk management strategies. In addition to data
analytics and AI, nonprofits can explore other innovative technological solutions to enhance
and encryption technologies can further fortify financial transactions and protect sensitive
donor information. By embracing technology and innovation, nonprofits can not only detect
and prevent fraud but also streamline their operations, enhance efficiency, and build a robust
training and educating nonprofit staff and board members. Employees and staff are the
employees are the weakest link to an organization’s security. This is not further from the truth
when it comes to fraud prevention. In few cases, it is seen that ignorance organization’s
regulatory frameworks can make employees susceptible to fraud charges. Either they did it
recognize and address fraudulent activities, nonprofits can create a proactive line of defense
a culture of compliance, where ethical standards and fraud prevention become ingrained in
the organizational ethos (Biegelman & Bartow, 2012). Training initiatives, workshops, and
necessary for effective fraud prevention. All in all, it is crucial to emphasize the
In the fight against fraud, nonprofits can amplify their impact through collaboration
with other nonprofits, government agencies, and private entities. Even though there are
challenges when it comes to collaboration, strategic alliances can definitely lead to success
for both nonprofits and businesses (Austin, 2010). Whether it be nonprofit and a nonprofit, a
nonprofit and a for-profit, or even a nonprofit with a government agency. The success of a
collaboration can only be so if there was insightful choosing and use of collaborative
networks effectively (Milward & Provan, 2023). Collaborative efforts facilitate the pooling of
resources, sharing of expertise, and the establishment of collective strategies to prevent and
Collaborative networks are valuable tools for nonprofits to enhance their capacity in
addressing complex issues, including fraud prevention (Milward & Provan, 2023). By
leveraging the strengths and resources of various partners, nonprofits can create a more
comprehensive and resilient approach to fraud prevention. Training and education, coupled
with collaborative efforts, serve as powerful pillars in the endeavor to prevent fraud within
nonprofit organizations.
12
FRAUD PREVENTION
Bibliography
Archambeault, D. S., Webber, S., & Greenlee, J. (2014). Fraud and corruption in U.S.
Austin, J. E. (2010). The collaboration challenge: How nonprofits and businesses succeed
390. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119202356.ch17
Buabeng, A. A. (2020). A Comparative Case Study of Internal Controls and the Impact of
Bănărescu, A. (2015). Detecting and preventing fraud with data analytics. Procedia
Holloway, T. (2023). Obstacles and Enablers for Employing Internal Control Practices
customer retention, and fraud detection and prevention. John Wiley &
Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119378846
Uygur, S. A., & Napier, C. J. (2023). Understanding fraud in the not-for-Profit sector: A
20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05373-5