Leader 222
Leader 222
Northouse (2016) asserts that for almost a century, scholars have struggled to define leadership.
Many people have attempted to define the term over time, yet each time they do another
definition appears. It is "a process wherein one individual influence a group of individuals to
attain a common purpose," according to Northouse. In my opinion, what makes a leader effective
is the bond they build with their followers, which enables them to accomplish a common goal.
There are several leadership styles that may be studied, and many of them have similar themes
and qualities. Several of them struck a chord with me while I was studying, so I used them as a
framework to create my ethical leadership action plan. I find that the transformational leadership
approach is the leadership style that most appeals to me. Since I've worked for a religious and
for-profit organization for the past five years and success in the workplace is positively
Northouse (2016) asserts that a transformational leader's influence on the people he leads is
significant. The charismatic leader can achieve his objectives with the aid of their empathetic
appeal and capacity for emotional persuasion. I do well in the idealized influence and intellectual
stimulation categories. When a leader helps his people see him as a role model and feel that
upholding his standards and principles is admirable, this is known as idealized influence.
Intellectual Stimulation, where a leader fosters an innovative environment among the followers,
was the second area in which I performed well. Steve Jobs, who via invention changed mobile
Stimulation (Reiss, 2014). There are critics of transformational leadership. Even while
transformational leaders have been among the most powerful figures in history, not all of them
were beneficial to their followers (Czaja, 2023). Transformational leaders are frequently those
connected to religious fanaticism, and in extreme circumstances, they have the power to
persuade followers to take extremely violent action. Jim Jones and Adolf Hitler come to mind as
exceptionally charismatic leaders who persuaded their followers to carry out and take part in
The Servant Leadership concept is the next leadership style that I find appealing. It makes sense
that this approach would appeal to me considering how much involved I have been in mosque
work for the whole of my adult life. Many of the tasks associated with running a mosque include
a servant mentality. The needs of the follower are given priority by the servant leader
(Northouse, 2016) over their own. By empathizing with the followers' interests over those of the
leader, a servant leader enables the followers to realize their full potential. Due to their care for
their followers' needs, servant leaders are able to implement change by persuading their
followers of the reforms' personal benefits. The servant leadership approach has its critics as
well. Because many study findings are anecdotal and, in some situations, subjective, many
researchers believe the model to be inadequate and lacking in credibility (Russell & Stone,
2002). Either someone is truthful, reliable, and committed to serving others, or they are not. In
SECTION 2:
Ethical leadership is leadership that has an impact on followers. In order to enhance ideals,
dignity, justice, honesty, charisma, and creativity without risking how we should behave, leaders
make decisions that reflect their own moral development. The major objective of every
organization's leader is to persuade the membership to pursue objectives and ultimately realize
the organization's vision. The definition of ethical leadership is that which is morally correct or
good; hence, deontological leadership ethics believes a leader's acts to have inherent moral status
whereas teleological leadership ethics views a leader's actions as having no intrinsic moral
significance (Kanungo, 2001). True charismatic and ethical leaders are created from a set of
presumptions about the connection between leaders and followers that operate out of genuine
care for both the people being led and the organization being led (Kanungo, 2001). Ethical
Leaders with high Emotional Intelligence behaviors promote empowering cultural norms, high
levels of team motivation, quality commitment, and enhanced productivity (Kumar, 2014).
Emotional intelligence (EI) is the capacity to skillfully interact with others. Self-awareness, self-
regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills are the five elements of EI, according to Daniel
Goleman. Self-Awareness is the capacity to recognize and understand one's mental state,
motivations, and abilities. Self-regulation is the capacity to control one's impulses, consider
before speaking, or responding. Empathy is the ability to comprehend another person's emotions.
advancement. Raghubir (2018) claim that having a thorough understanding of people can help
people become more attentive of their own actions. Others become more driven and
strengths and weaknesses in this situation, I may be able to improve my skill. It might be
my motivation to work toward objectives that will ultimately assure my career advancement.
which could help me develop myself and make wise decisions. Housman (2017) asserts that
having a profound appreciation for others facilitates the growth of self-regulation abilities. As a
Additionally, it strengthens the most widely used strategy for developing and upholding
However, Blau et al. (2020) observed that the development of profound mindfulness is aided by
facilitates task completion by taking on liability. As a pioneer, it also helps to inspire and
influence others. Other than aiding in the acquisition of knowledge, social skills aid in enhancing
sociability and relationship-building skills. According to Salavera et al. (2017) the ability to
deeply respect people helps to improve interpersonal skills. It helps to improve social contact,
which improves one's capacity for social interaction. Additionally, it makes it easier to
understand other people's tendencies and psychological needs. As a result, it increases the
possibility that you will initiate conversations with others, enabling more amicable development.
Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T. & Avdiel, O., 2020. How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced
collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of
students?.. The internet and higher education, Volume 45, p. 100722.
Calabresi, 2016. Wells Fargo customer fraud deals political setback to banks. Time, Volume 188, pp. 13-
14.
De Meuse, K., 2017. Learning agility: Its evolution as a psychological construct and its empirical
relationship to leader success. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 69(4), p. 267.
Housman, D., 2017. The importance of emotional competence and self-regulation from birth: A case for
the evidence-based emotional cognitive social early learning approach. International Journal of Child
Care and Education Policy, 11(1), pp. 1-19.
Kanungo, R. N., 2001. Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders. Canadian Journal of
Administrative Sciences, 18(4), pp. 257-265.
Kumar, S., 2014. Establishing linkages between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership.
Industrial psychiatry journal, 23(1), pp. 1-3.
Northouse, P., 2016. Leadership: Theory and practice. 7th ed. CA: SAGE: Thousand Oak.
Raghubir, A., 2018. Emotional intelligence in professional nursing practice: A concept review using
Rodgers's evolutionary analysis approach. International journal of nursing sciences, , 5(2), pp. 126-130.
Reiss, R., 2014. How to become a transformative CEO.. Leader to Leader, Volume 72, pp. 19-24.
Russell, R. & Stone, A., 2002. A review of servant leadership attributes: Developing a practical model.
Leadership & organization development journal, 23(3), pp. 145-157.
Salavera, C., Usan, P. & Jarie, L., 2017. Emotional intelligence and social skills on self-efficacy in
secondary education students. Are there gender differences?. Journal of adolescence, Volume 60, pp.
39-46.