Lecture 6
Lecture 6
(m/~)3 1
f (v ) = (1
4π 3 2
2 mv −kB T0 )
e kB T
+1
R
T0 determined such that f (v )dv = n
Sommerfeld theory replaces fB (v ) of Drude’s theory with f (v )
profound consequences on ε̄ and cv
Plot of Maxwell-Boltzmann and Fermi-Dirac distributions for the same n given by T = 0.01T0 .
Mathematical treatment
1
The free electron gas is confined in a cube of edge L (L = V 3 )
Assume the independent electron approximation
Solve the TISE (separation of variables)
~2 2
− ∇ ψ(r ) = εψ(r )
2m
Apply Born-von Karman boundary conditions to the general solution
ψ(x, y , z + L) = ψ(x, y , z)
ψ(x, y + L, z) = ψ(x, y , z)
ψ(x + L, y , z) = ψ(x, y , z)
Separation of variables
ε = εx + εy + εz
Separation of variables
(
d2
dx 2
+ k 2 φ(x) = 0
φ(x)
φ(x + L) = φ(x)
ψk (r ) = √1 e ik·r
V
|ψk (r )|2 dr = 1
R
normalized inside the cube:
allowed wave vectors k:
2πn
kx = 2πn y
L ; ky = L ; kz =
x 2πnz
L
nx , ny , nz = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .
~2 k 2
ε = ε(|k|) = 2m (depends only on k = |k|)
Some numbers
1
( 9π )3
kF = 4
rs = 1.92
rs = 3.63
rs Å−1
a0
Some numbers
Therefore:
dk ~2 k 2 1 ~2 kF5
Z
E
=2 =
V k<kF 8π 3 2m π 2 10m
Derivation
The N-electron state is specified by a list of the one-electron levels
occupied
states ψkσ (r )
Define fi N = PN (EαN )
P
Derivation
fi N = 1 − PN (EγN )
P
Derivation
1
fi N = (εi −µ)
e kB T
+1
P N
P 1
N= i fi = i (εi −µ)
e kB T +1
N (or n = VN ) as a function of T and µ
We can express µ as a function of n and T
Limiting form of fi N
In the ground-state:
(
fkσ = 1 ε(k) < εF
fkσ = 0 ε(k) > εF
Therefore limT →0 µ = εF
µ ∼ εF also at room temperature
1
f (ε(k)) = (ε−µ)
e kB T
+1
U
Defining u = V Z
dk
u= ε(k)f (ε(k))
4π 3
P
From N = 2 k f (ε(k)):
Z
dk
n= f (ε(k))
4π 3
Density of levels
Working in spherical coordinates:
Z Z ∞ 2 Z ∞
dk k dk
F (ε(k)) = F (ε(k)) = dεg (ε)F (ε)
4π 3 0 π2 −∞
mkF
At the Fermi level: g (εF ) = ~2 π 2
Density of levels
Alternatively: (
3 n ε 1/2
2 εF ( εF ) ε>0
g (ε) =
0 ε<0
3 n
At the Fermi level: g (εF ) = 2 εF
Also, to order T 2 :
Z µ Z εF
H(ε)dε = H(ε)dε + (µ − εF )H(εF )
0 0
Note:
Rε
n = 0 F g (ε)dε
Rε
u0 = 0 F εg (ε)dε
Deviation of µ from εF
From:
π2
0 = (µ − εF )g (εF ) + (kB T )2 g 0 (εF )
6
We get:
π2 g 0 (εF )
µ = εF − (kB T )2
6 g (εF )
1 πkB T 2
= εF 1 − ( )
3 2εF
π2 2
∂u
cv = = k Tg (εF )
∂T v 3 B
2
π kB T
= nkB
2 εF
Fermi function at T 6= 0
π2
kB T
Experimental verification of cv = 2 εF
nkB
π2 kB Tg (εF )
C = ZR
3 n
1 2 Z rs
=⇒ γ = π R = 0.169Z ( )2 × 10−4 cal mol−1 K −2
2 TF a0
π2
kB T
Experimental verification of cv = 2 εF
nkB
with velocity v = ~k
m → dk = ( m 3
~ ) dv
therefore the number of electrons with velocity ∈ (v , v + dv ) is:
( m~ )3 1
f (v )dv = 1/2mv 2 −µ
dv
4π 3
e kB T
+1
∆x∆p ∼ ~
Sommerfeld used the Fermi-Dirac velocity distribution in an otherwise
classical theory
Classical description of electron dynamics is valid if:
r and p can be specified as accurately as necessary
without violating the uncertainty principle (∆x∆p ∼ ~)
The classical description is valid if:
∆p << ~kF ∼ p
∆x ∼ ∆p
~
>> k1F ∼ rs ∼ 2–6Å
∆x∆p ∼ ~
Electronic position must be specified in some instances:
for applied electromagnetic fields (∆x << λ)
for applied T gradients
Conclusions of the models were valid if E or T vary negligibly in the
scale of ∆x
valid for UV-vis radiation, not X-rays (QM must be used)
usually valid for normal ∇T ’s
We assumed ∆x << l, the mean free path
l ∼ 100Å at room T
Thermal conductivity
From κ = 31 v 2 τ cv
κ π 2 kB 2
= ( ) = 2.44 × 10−8 watt · ohm/K 2
σT 3 e
Thermopower
With Sommerfeld estimate of the specific heat:
π 2 kB kB T kB T
Q=− ( ) = −1.42( ) × 10−4 volt/K
6 e εF εF