The Good, The Bad, and The Women
The Good, The Bad, and The Women
The Good, The Bad, and The Women
Isabelle Persson
Key Words: women’s agency, Syria, news media, imperialism, critical discourse analysis
1
List of Abbreviations
BBC = British Broadcasting Corporation
DN = Dagens Nyheter
GNM = The Guardian News and Media Ltd. referring in this study to the Guardian online
ISIS = the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, also commonly known as IS, Daesh/Da’ish or ISIL
SWE = Sweden
UK = United Kingdom
WP = Washington Post
2
Table of Contents
Abstract .................................................................................................................................... II
List of Abbreviations ..............................................................................................................III
1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 5
1.4 Delimitations..................................................................................................................... 8
2. Background ........................................................................................................................... 9
4. Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 24
5. Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 31
3
5.1.2 The Western Muhaajirat .......................................................................................... 35
6. Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 47
6.1 The Constructions of the YPJ and the Western Muhaajirat of ISIS ............................... 47
References ............................................................................................................................... 50
4
1. Introduction
1.1 Research Problem
The nationwide uprisings in Syria in March 2011 sparked an outbreak of violence which still
as of today has seen little progress on the way towards any peaceful solution. The now full-
blown war in Syria has become central in understanding the socio-political landscape of the
decade, not only in Syria but in most regions of this globalized world. Syria has additionally
become the epitome of Mary Kaldor’s ‘new war’ with numerous actors involved and the
failure of the nation-state (Kaldor, 2012; UCDP, 2015).
As many scholars have pointed out, news media is a powerful discursive actor in framing
armed conflict and affecting public opinion in relation to these events (Carruthers, 2011;
Hoskins & O’Loughlin, 2010; van Dijk, 1988). Even with access to incredible amounts of
knowledge in this digital era, it is hard to keep track of who is involved how in the context of
today’s Syria and unfortunately there is a significant lack of representation of women even in
the reports produced by the most well-known news agencies (Ohlsson, 2015). There is an
understandable issue in finding reliable sources and information in contexts of armed conflict
(Sundberg & Harbom, 2011: 90), especially when taking into account the violence directed
towards journalists and aid workers by extremist groups such as ISIS and Jabhat al-Nusra.
Nevertheless, there remains an interesting inequity in which actors are deemed newsworthy in
relation to Syria. A few women in Syria have made a significant enough impression on the
press in order to be included in the news reporting on the conflict (Ohlsson, 2015) even
though there are many involved in different ways in Syria1. In this context I will focus on two
categories, which interestingly are on the opposite sides of the same battle: The female
fighters of the Kurdish Yekîneyên Parastina Jinê (YPJ) and what I will refer to as the Western
Muhaajirat of ISIS.
The YPJ is an all-female faction of Yekîneyên Parastina Gel (YPG) - the Kurdish militia
famous for fighting ISIS in Ayn al-Arab (Kobane) in 2015. The YPG and YPJ serves as the
military defense in the now autonomous Kurdish controlled regions in Northern Syria, under
the name Rojava (Bengio, 2016: 39). The societal structures of Rojava have sprung out of the
ideas of Abdullah Öcallan, the infamous leader of the Kurdish PKK (Kurdistan’s Worker’s
1
See the only field study report, at the time of writing, on Syrian women’s activism and peacebuilding in Syria
published by Kvinna till Kvinna and Badael Foundation at:
http://kvinnatillkvinna.se/publication/2015/10/16/peacebuilding-defines-our-future-now/.
5
Party) in Turkey (ibid.: 34f.). Rojava is said to be based on principles of democracy, social
justice and gender equality and is therefore considered to be a case of its own in the Middle
East (ibid.: 37ff.). BBC (2015) even labels Rojavan society as a place where “gender equality
extends from the homes to the frontline.” The female fighters of the YPJ has become symbols
of hope and progress in the struggle against ISIS and a representation of gender equality at its
peak (Bengio, 2016; SvD, 2015-05-24; IND, 2015-12-09).
The Western Muhaajirat of ISIS takes active part in the struggle for ISIS success, and have
come to symbolize a backwards and conservative way of treating women, consequently they
are treated much differently from the YPJ in Swedish, British and North American news
media. The word Muhaajirat (plural) refers to women who perform Hjira, which has come to
mean migrating to Muslim land, and has been framed by the self-proclaimed leader of ISIS,
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, as a religious duty (Peresin & Cervone, 2015: 495). These women
remain difficult to approach for many Westerners, journalists and scholars alike, because of
these women’s anti-West sentiments and because of limited understandings of why women
would turn to a conservative and separatist community when they have been part of the
‘liberated’ West (Peresin & Cervone, 2015: 495; Gentry, 2011: 179). Indeed, it is quite
astonishing how these women leave a comparably safe milieu for that of a war-torn country,
yet the neocolonialist framework merely seems to understand them as manipulated and
brainwashed thus depriving them of agency (Gentry, 2011: 179ff.). Instead, there seem to be a
complex array of personal and ideological motivations for these women to travel across the
world to participate in the struggle with ISIS which need to be acknowledged and further
studied (Peresin & Cervone, 2015; Pearson, 2015).
These two categories of women create an interesting tension which has potential to reveal
societal expectations, roles and demands of women during times of armed conflict. Worth
noting is that this study has no intention of speculating on why these women have chosen
respective sides or comparing one cause with the other. Instead the interest is with how they
are constructed in Western news media and the discursive implications of these constructions,
which will be explored through Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis (CDA) in combination
with postcolonial feminist theory.
6
the female fighters of the YPJ and the Western Muhaajirat of ISIS. As recommended by
Creswell (2009: 200ff.) I have turned this aim into a central question and deconstructed it into
operational sub-questions. Hence, the main question is as follows:
How are the female fighters of the YPJ and the Western Muhaajirat of ISIS constructed in
texts by Swedish, British and North American influential media houses?
How are the YPJ constructed in the news material, and what discourses have allowed
these specific constructions?
How are the Western Muhaajirat of ISIS constructed in the news material, and what
discourses have allowed these specific constructions?
What do these constructions suggest about the news media order of discourse?
What wider sociocultural processes are these constructions part of and what are the
likely effects of these constructions?
7
1.4 Delimitations
The focus of this study is mainly focused on the intertextual analysis stage of CDA, and in
regards to the production, there is a larger interest in the discursive processes of production,
rather than institutional processes within each media house. I will also limit myself in regards
to conclusions on sociocultural practice and the effects of the discursive practices on non-
discursive, as there is limited insight into non-discursive practices. Lastly, I will avoid
speculations or comments on the possible perspectives of the women or the different actors
they support in different ways. The interest is directed towards the imperial powers, as my
own background is within this context, and, additionally, this is advised as a necessity by Said
(1999) because of the powerful meaning-production by these, both in regards to distribution
and ideological hegemony elaborated on in chapter three.
8
2. Background
Here I provide a descriptive account of academic consensus about these two categories of
women. Both groups are not extensively researched, which makes it difficult to make claims
on what we know about these women, and there is a general call for more research on
women’s active participation in militant and terrorist organizations (Sjoberg, Cook & Neal,
2011). Partly, this section outlines some previous research on females’ participation in
terrorist activities, whether religious or non-religious, then moves on to a summarization on
the little information there is on the two specific groups of women’s historical and contextual
situation, and serves as a contrast to the analysis of Western media representations.
9
oriented, and the aim is perceived as independence and freedom, terrorist organizations are
international in scope and the fight is legitimized internally through discourses rejecting the
Western idea of civilization (ibid.). Today, terrorism is generally in media, the scholarly
community and policy-making associated with extremist Islamist movements, in particular al-
Qaeda and now its successor, ISIS, thus tending to an Orientalist narrative (Sjoberg, Cook &
Neal, 2011: 12). A significant marker was of course after the attacks on 11 September 2001,
when many of the world’s largest states (and other powerful international actors) decided that
“terrorism as such […] could be fought against” (Sjoberg, Cook & Neal, 2011.: 12) and the
fundamentalist Muslim Other became hegemonic as the image of the terrorist (Sjoberg, Cook
& Neal, 2011; Thobani, 2007; Qazi, 2011).
Within these studies, women have been generally devalued as actors, and consequently not
been central as foci of research (Sjoberg, Cook & Neal, 2011). The general fault in relation to
women engaging in militant or terrorist activities has been to attribute women’s motivations
to the personal and the men’s to the political, thus failing to acknowledge the complexity of
motivations of all genders, which usually consists of both personal and political dimensions
(Sjoberg, Cook & Neal, 2011; Pearson, 2015). In addition, if the women partake in actual
combat, their motivation might be extended to fighting for women’s liberation, because this is
typically perceived as the main (and only) political cause relevant to women generally
(Gentry & Sjoberg, 2011: 74). As a result, “[w]hen a woman commits an act of terror, the
resulting propaganda is more about her (and her womanhood) than the act she has committed”
(Sjoberg, Cook & Neal, 2011: 18).
10
The women of the YPJ transgress gender norms reserved for women in many societies and
some resistance from families and the surrounding society is to expect when women decide to
join as combatants (Bengio, 2015: 38ff.). What has been a major critique towards these
militias is, however, not solely tied to their gender. Many who want to join are still young and
even underage, which causes problems especially when they die in battle (Tavakolian, 2015:
43; Human Rights Watch, 2015). However, women’s advancement within Rojavan society
has impressed many and the YPJ has been the outstanding example with women organizing
ideologically and physically against Islamist forces (Bengio, 2015: 39). Their military activity
now generally symbolizes women’s emancipation, and it is hard to contend whether their
activity is allowed to extend to include the Kurdish anti-capitalist liberation as well.
Unfortunately, scholars, media and decision-makers have a tendency to frame women’s
liberation as the only political struggle women are interested in (Gentry & Sjoberg, 2011: 74,
Sjoberg, Cooke & Neal, 2011: 5). Ofra Bengio (2015) enthusiastically describes the Rojavan
struggle as that of a “double revolution”, but greatly emphasizes women’s liberation in
comparison to the general Kurdish liberation. It is here noteworthy that the YPG and the YPJ
have connections to the PKK which is listed as a terrorist organization by the United States of
America (Gupta, 2016: 43), yet still the violence of the YPJ is generally considered
legitimate, or at least the violence is not problematized except for the cases of under-aged
combatants.
The people of Rojava, including the women of the YPJ, are explicitly anti-capitalist and if
successful they might actually pose a threat to the Western consumerist society, where
capitalism permeates the USA, the UK and Sweden alike. However, it is difficult to conclude
whether this gender egalitarianism and new way of life will persist throughout the Syrian
conflict and the post-conflict challenges that will face the region in the future. Research on
liberation struggles, secular or religious, where women have joined violently in militias
suggest that this equality negotiated during conflict, rarely survives in post-conflict societies
(Eliatamby, 2011: 49; Skjelsbæk, 2001: 58, 64f.).
11
shed some light on the women travelling from the West to join ISIS in establishing a
caliphate. Even though the Quran demonstrates examples of legitimately violent women, this
is still contested within the minority of strains of Islam that advocates violence (Qazi, 2011).
Violent female terrorism has within patriarchal terrorist movements been used as a way of
shaming men into violent practice, but largely, women uphold a supportive role within these
organizations, which interestingly corresponds with the expectations of women in societies
more generally (Sjoberg, Cooke & Neal, 2011: 5). They are meant to give birth to and educate
the children, and motivate the men to fight. Additionally, they might be given tasks of
fundraising, recruiting other women, and limited amount of professions, such as nursing. But
the most honorable and highest status purpose for women in these Islamic terrorist
organizations is to raise their sons for jihad (Qazi, 2011: 47).
The group of women – the Western Muhajirat of ISIS – in focus in this study is understood to
largely uphold these seemingly nonviolent roles, and those women defying this norm is a
great minority. One example is the case of Roshonara Choudhry, a British Muslim woman,
who managed to interpret online propaganda in favor of violence committed by women
resulting in her ‘self-radicalization’ and stabbing of a male member of British Parliament
(Pearson, 2015). Still, Choudhry had some similarities with her nonviolent female peers, in
particular the process of online radicalization. Many of the women travelling to join ISIS are
reached by videos of Anwar Al Awlaki, who delivers sermons in English directed towards a
Western audience (Pearson, 2015: 8), or other Western Muhajirat who already have joined the
group (Peresin & Cervone, 2015: 499ff.). There are some indications that a significant portion
have family or other loved ones in Syria, thus travelling to join them in the fight (ibid.).
Never before have so many in such a short period of time been mobilized from the West to
join jihad, and even though exact numbers are hard to come by, it is estimated that over 200
women had left Europe 2015 for this purpose and there is no sign of stopping to this trend,
most of them aged 16 to 24 (ibid.). Approximately 10 % of all Western members of ISIS are
said to be women, and because of the limitations in communication and access to these
women it is difficult to understand their motivation and even more difficult to know anything
of their real life conditions in ISIS’s caliphate (Peresin & Cervone, 2015: 499ff.; Pearson,
2015). What we do know is that ISIS media and propaganda strategies are efficiently
gendered and tailored to its targeted audience, and that ISIS are targeting young women to
join willingly, seeing as these enthusiastically support the cause in different ways as opposed
to the local women in the area who largely have been forced into this role against their will
12
(Peresin & Cervone, 2015: 500). In addition, women who choose to leave the West in favor of
this way of life perform a symbolically powerful act, which seems to cause confusion in the
eyes of Western institutions (Gentry, 2011: 179) and simultaneously becomes a “morale
booster” for the male combatants of ISIS (Peresin & Cervone, 2015: 500).
Lastly, it is worth noting that while women generally are not advised to join the fighting on
the frontlines of ISIS’s battles, there is today an all-female brigade (or perhaps rather a
women’s activist group considering their multitude of activities), known as Al-Khanssaa,
which was established by a British woman in 2014 (Peresin & Cervone, 2015: 500; Al-
Khanssaa Brigade, 2015: 5). However, this brigade targets women in the areas controlled by
ISIS, and aims to make sure that women comply to the codes of conduct in Islamic law.
Otherwise, there is no sign that the leaders of ISIS will be embracing the advancement of
violent roles for women, especially as they manage to recruit enough manpower for these
purposes (Peresin & Cervone, 2015: 501f.). Rather, women are more needed in the roles of
mothers and educators in order for ISIS to truly establish the sustainable caliphate they have
set out to do (Peresin & Cervone, 2015: 499ff.; Al-Khanssaa Brigade, 2015: 17ff.).
13
3. Analytical Framework
In this chapter, I provide a comprehensive outline of the analytical framework used in this
study. The analytical framework of this thesis is based on the theory of discourse as outlined
by Fairclough, which is necessary due to the fact that critical discourse analysis (CDA) comes
as a package of both theoretical and methodological considerations that must not be separated
in application (Winther Jørgensen & Phillips, 2000: 10). A critique towards CDA has been
that discourse analysts use broad concepts such as power and ideology too loosely
(Fairclough, 2008: 817) which is why I deem it necessary to elaborate on these basic
definitions already in this chapter. With risk of repeating myself, I will first outline the basic
theoretical assumptions of CDA, with particular focus on news media, and further elaborate
on the methodological considerations of CDA in the subsequent chapter. CDA with its origins
in linguistics should preferably be complemented with social and/or cultural theories (Winther
Jørgensen & Phillips, 2000: 75) and suitable for this study is postcolonial feminist theory,
which will include a discussion on gendered stereotypes in conflict. By combining these
perspectives which problematize the reductionist views on non-Western women and women
in conflict, I hope to provide a more nuanced representation of women in conflict and through
this study counteract the oppressive and potentially dangerous view of women as a monolithic
and homogenous group.
3.1 Discourse
Discourse has a quite specific meaning. It refers to groups of statements which structure the
way a thing is thought, and the way we act on the basis of that thinking. In other words,
discourse is a particular knowledge about the world, which shapes how the world is
understood and how things are done in it. (Rose, 2001: 136)
Discourse analysis builds upon social constructivism, where all social phenomena, including
discourse, are constructed through processes of meaning-making which occur in social action
and interaction (Creswell, 2009: 37f.). This means that humans engage with and makes sense
of their surroundings based on their social and historical backgrounds, and meaning is
generated socially from negotiation occurring in and out of interactions with the community
and context of the individual (ibid.).
Norman Fairclough uses two different definitions of discourse. In a more abstract sense,
discourse is language as a sociocultural practice, which refers to discourse as constitutive,
14
hence it is continuously engaged in a dialectical interaction with other sociocultural practices
no matter if they are discursive or non-discursive (Winther Jørgensen & Phillips, 2000: 62f.),
much like the above opening quote from Gillian Rose. Another definition of discourse is
distinguished by Fairclough’s use of a grammatical article, e. g. the discourse, or a discourse
(Fairclough, 1995; Winther Jørgensen & Phillips, 2000: 72). If discourse is language in use, a
discourse refers to a particular way of expressing meaning from a particular perspective which
is distinguishable from other discourses, such as a liberal discourse, feminist discourse et
cetera. Norman Fairclough’s understanding of discourse (in either definition) essentially
differs from that of Laclau and Mouffe’s, as Fairclough only includes discursive practices as a
sociocultural phenomenon separated from non-discursive practices, in order to be able to
acknowledge and account for inequities that are structural within society, and, consequently
more rigid and difficult to change than other practice (Winther Jørgensen & Phillips, 2000:
41f.). Laclau and Mouffe includes both discursive and non-discursive, and has been critiqued
for the optimistic (and unrealistic?) possibilities for social and political change (ibid.: 42).
Within Peace and Conflict theory, a normative discipline, flexibility facilitating the
possibilities for change is needed within the scholarly community, otherwise there would be
no reason to actually engage in conflict transformation, resolution or the facilitation of peace
(Skjelsbæk, 2001: 50ff.). According to Johan Galtung, there is a need for this inclusion of
awareness of cultural and structural resistance to change from dominating actors and to
further acknowledge that structural violence might not be realized as violence by it victims
(Galtung, 1969: 173). Thus Norman Fairclough’s understanding of discourse as language in
use allows for an understanding of this rigidness of societal structures (Winther Jørgensen &
Phillips, 2000: 42), hence I deem it most theoretically appropriate in relation to Peace and
Conflict.
Lastly, language might seem as a limited understanding of discourse, considering its role in
constructing social identities and practice. However, in Fairclough’s defense James Paul Gee
(2011: 30) argues, “[s]ince different identities and activities are enacted in and through
language, the study of language is integrally connected to matters of inequity and justice.”
15
Discourses contribute to processes of construction of social identity, social relations and
knowledge production (Fairclough, 1995). Furthermore, they are considered to function in an
ideological manner, which means that underlying ideologies create meaning that reinforces
unequal social orders. Ideology is here understood as a constructed interpretation of reality
which serves legitimizing purposes for power (ibid.: 14). Power within the theory of discourse
is not what might be traditionally associated with the term, but is rather in a Foucauldian
sense something that does not belong to specific agents (Rose, 2001: 137; Winther Jørgensen
& Phillips, 2000: 20). Instead it is understood as permeating the sociocultural practices of
everyday life (ibid.). Power is in this sense a productive force which is not reduced to being
solely oppressive, rather power disciplines human beings into certain ways of seeing, being
and acting in and with our social surroundings, and conversely delimit what can be
understood and said about the same, thus excluding alternative options (ibid.). Further, there
is an intimate relationship between power and knowledge, and Gillian Rose (2001: 138)
describes this as follows: ”[…] that power and knowledge directly imply one another; that
there is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any
knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations.”
News media upholds an incredible potential for power, as it is an institution, which explicitly
aims to produce knowledge on specific events, such as, armed conflict (Fairclough, 1995:
2ff.). Moreover, news media, much like scientific production, is commonly perceived as
giving a comprehensive and objective account of the communicated event resulting in an
unawareness of media as a discursive actor expressing particular representations of reality
(Fairclough, 1995: 12; van Dijk, 1988: 289). It becomes even more problematic when
reviewing what type of visual material is used in news reporting. Rose (2001: 6) argues that it
is necessary to take images seriously, because not even photography or recordings should be
considered to provide “transparent windows on to the world” (ibid.), thus should never be
rendered “innocent” (ibid.). Rather an image is always interpreted, and as pointed out by
Fairclough (1995: 7) an image might be captured from the perspective of the police,
conversely telling a different story if the image would have been from another actor’s point of
view.
In order to provide a theoretical understanding of the role of media in conflict today, Andrew
Hoskins and Ben O’Loughlin (2010) have suggested the use of the analytical terms new
media ecology and the mediatization of war. The new media ecology proposes that the
globalized media technologies has been part in revolutionizing the environment in which
16
media is produced and distributed. With the access to any material through internet, media
seeks to uphold a “perpetual connectivity” between participants of conflict (through blogs,
videos etc.) and recipients of media, emphasizing and transforming the use of media as a
powerful tool of warfare (ibid.: 2). This is referred to as the mediatization of war, and
proposes that conduct of war and organized violence cannot in current times be fully
understood without taking into account the role of media (ibid.: 4ff.). Consequently, previous
theories on audiences, propaganda and war have to be rethought and understood in the context
of this new ecology and the political discourse on terrorism, which is marked by “effects
without causes” (ibid.). Today anyone can record, archive and distribute material on an event
almost instantly, and news media often buy images and recordings from civilians who have
happened to be there at the time of the event, which add to this chaotic element of things
seemingly happening out of nowhere. In addition, news media is already known to often fail
to contextualize acts of organized violence, such as the attacks on the Twin Towers 11
September 2001 (Hoskins & O’Loughlin, 2010; Carruthers, 2011).
Further, the globalizing technological advances have been part in assuring the global
domination of North American and European news media, causing cultural disjunction
between producers and consumers (Fairclough, 1995: 36ff.). There also occur temporal and
spatial disjunctions, referring mainly to the movement of the communicative event from the
public into the private sphere (ibid.). Fairclough uses the notion of a chain of communicative
events to illustrate this movement and it is meant to highlight the collective process of media
production and consumption (ibid.). These are defining properties of mass media as we
experience it today and it makes possible to understand text and discursive practices of media
as evolved into cultural commodity (ibid.: 38). The marketization of public space has further
provided a pro-capitalist stance because of the powerful economic incentives enforced by
competition (ibid.: 42ff.). In this way, audiences are interpreted and framed as spectators of
events consuming entertainment, rather than participating citizens, which affects the potential
of agency, and sense of responsibility among readers (Fairclough, 1995: 42ff.; Hoskins &
O’Loughlin, 2010: 37ff.). This emphasizes the authority of the reporter who has the right to
share the supposed ‘facts’, and projects the audience as passive recipients of knowledge
(Fairclough, 1995: 4, 42ff.).
What is particularly interesting with news media is the reliance on legitimized sources. These
refer to officials in different governmental institutions, and technical or scientific experts
which supports the ‘facts’ presented in the material (ibid.: 49). Ordinary people, however,
17
plays an entirely different role. They are usually included to provide reactions to the
communicated event in the text, such as weeping widows mourning their loss. They provide a
sort of emotional legitimacy and are “entitled to their experiences but not their opinions” and
Fairclough calls this the hierarchization of voices (ibid.). The result is a social construction of
reality and ‘facts’ from an institutional point of view, but unfortunately this does not
necessarily translate into a truthful or nuanced representation of reality (ibid.).
Postcolonial studies generally aim to recognize and renegotiate the dominance of Western
value systems and ideology established during colonial times (Nealon & Searls Giroux, 2012:
155-159). Further, postcolonial theorists argue that colonialism is not a thing of the past, but
rather still characterizes current times financially and culturally (Eriksson, Eriksson Baaz &
Thörn, 1999: 14). Globalization, a well-known concept put simply as referring to the
increasing interconnectedness of the world, has become well-researched and the body of
literature massive, particularly in regards to its financial processes and considerations (ibid.).
Much of research on globalization have been criticized by postcolonial theorists to be guided
by Eurocentric perspectives and consequently reinforcing an asymmetric power relation
between the ‘West’ and its Other. While globalization is a result of colonialism, thus
connecting colonial times with today, the central focus of postcolonial theory is globalization
of culture, which has transformed previously more confined cultures into cultural flows
(ibid.). Additionally, culture, identity and ethnicity are increasingly attributed political
dimensions in the public sphere, particularly visible in the political climate after the Bush
administration declared war on terrorism (Eriksson, Eriksson Baaz & Thörn, 1999: 14; Cloud,
2004; Thobani, 2007: 169f.).
18
practice, the theory, and the attitudes of a dominating metropolitan centre ruling a distant
territory” and is in the age of mass media most visible in the global domination of North
American and European news media houses as mentioned in the previous section. However,
these imperialist attitudes have become much subtler in comparison to the outspoken racial
doctrine dominating the first half of the 20th century, even though the Orientalist
representations can be argued to be stronger today than during those times (Eriksson, Eriksson
Baaz & Thörn, 1999: 20f.). Orientalism, developed by Said, is a concept used in order to
explain how Western actors still reinforces an ‘us’ vs. ‘them’ binary through the conflation of
heterogeneous non-Western cultures into the homogenous category of ‘the East’ (Cloud,
2004). This and other similar binary oppositions (nature/civilization; man/woman;
normal/abnormal etc.) are often ideological in that they are reductionist, that is, they do not
allow anything in between the opposing parts, and effective in hiding asymmetric power
relations (Eriksson, Eriksson Baaz & Thörn, 1999: 18). To summarize, the ‘East’/’West’
binary facilitated the use of oppressive reductionist views of the ‘Orient’ beneficial to colonial
powers.
The two opposing parts of binary oppositions are known to work as being defined by each
other, in other words, what one is, the other is not (Eriksson, Eriksson Baaz & Thörn, 1999:
18-21; Skjelsbæk, 2001; Cheldelin & Eliatamby, 2011). The ‘East’ (or the ‘Orient’) came to
symbolize irrationality, despotism, seduction, femininity, and regressive attitudes, which
allowed the ‘West’ (also referred to as the ‘Occident’) to remain in the masculine domain of
representing progress, rationality and democracy (Eriksson, Eriksson Baaz & Thörn, 1999:
20f.; Mohanty, 1988: 65). Postcolonial feminist theory poses that this feminization of the
colonized peoples results from the historical hegemonic gender order of Europe (Eriksson,
Eriksson Baaz & Thörn, 1999: 23). These interpretative frames in combination with other
discursive practices allowed the construction of a certain representation of the colonized
woman which made possible for the colonial powers to legitimize colonialism as a
progressive mission of modernization and liberation (Spivak, 1999: 2193). Thus women’s
societal position became a measurement of progress and development in imperialist discourse,
which even Western feminist scholars reproduced through treating Third World women as a
homogenous group, and as the negative reflection of the white, liberated and ‘free’ woman
(Eriksson, Eriksson Baaz & Thörn, 1999: 23ff.). As Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (1999: 2193)
highlights, the white man becomes the savior of the “brown women from the brown men.”
Further, Western middle-class women became and are still constructed as the norm in
19
academia, and as a normative group they become the point of reference, which tends to result
in stereotyping of other women as uneducated, poor, religious victims of the traditional norms
of a regressive (non-Western) society (Mohanty, 1988: 65ff.). Implicitly, this suggests that
Western women are well-educated, modern, and liberated from oppression. However, as
Chandra Mohanty (ibid.) points out, if this in fact was true, there would be no need for
political feminist struggle in Western contexts. However, worth noting is that Western
feminist scholars are not the only ones at risk of using themselves as the implicit referent.
This is a tendency in much academic literature, even in the case of Third World Women
writing about rural or lower-class women in their context. What is specific for the case of
Western scholars is the discursive power the ‘West’ generally holds in relation to its Other
(ibid.: 64, 80 ff.).
In the light of the above, there is an additional interesting tension between the West’s
construction of its Other and its ‘universalization of universalism’ through the international
community. The Western hegemonic narrative in the postcolonial era then asks of the Other to
nurture and maintain the ‘authentic’ culture, to remember and affirm the difference from
Western culture, but at the same time the Other must adhere to ‘universal’ values and rights,
and particularly to patterns of development. Difference is necessary for the West to maintain
its powerful discursive position, but must simultaneously be expressed on Western terms
(Minh-ha, 1989: 222). This means that difference is acknowledged in order for the West to
possess a position of civilized superiority, but that all phenomena, such as women’s
liberation, in non-Western countries are unfairly judged “under Western eyes” (Mohanty,
1988: 61).
Discourses surrounding armed conflict are highly gendered. Gender serves as an important
ordering principle when it comes to issues of power, control and agency (Moser & Clark,
2001: 5) and the long withstanding European gender order positions women and men in an
asymmetrical relationship where “[v]alues associated with masculinity are prized only
insomuch as they are superior to values associated with femininity” (Via, 2010: 43, original
emphasis). Femininity and masculinity are understood as antonyms, as binary opposites,
which in discourses on organized violence and armed conflict translates into an uneven
20
construction of who is capable of agency and violence, and conversely, who is not (Sjoberg &
Via, 2010: 3; Moser & Clark, 2001: 5 ff.). A common misperception of women in conflict is
that they are passive victims of the violent conflicts of men. This further adds to the idea that
women are the most targeted group in conflict and that men consequently cannot be victims,
simply because of their perceived gender (Via, 2010; Zarkov, 2001). While this might be true
in some instances, a growing body of academic literature suggests otherwise. In fact, a study
published in 2005 showed that women were actively engaging in armed forces in 55 different
conflicts and studies on female terrorism confirm that there is so far no sign of an end to this
trend (Eliatamby, 2011: 37; Peresin & Cervone, 2015: 499ff.). Simultaneously, studies on
genocide show that civilian men are the most targeted group, because of the belief that men
are potential combatants and consequently never quite become understood as non-combatants
as civilians actually are supposed to be regardless of gender (Cheldelin & Eliatamby, 2011: 1;
Jones, 2006).
In studies focusing on female terrorists and suicide bombings, there is a growing critique of
interpreting these women within the narrow framework of traditional gender roles, thus
depriving them of agency, when there is a growing need to understand women not merely as
victims (of violence or manipulation) but as willing perpetrators in conflict (Eliatamby &
Romanova, 2011: 62). Generally, in this body of literature religious explanations have been
used, in combination with violent forms of manipulation, but this again strips these women of
making an active choice and utilizing individual power for agency and reduces them to the
traditional feminine stereotype in war (ibid.). Sandra I. Cheldelin and Maneshka Eliatamby
(2011: 3) argues that women’s agency in conflict must be acknowledge as “the capacity for
women to make choices – good and evil – and to impose their choices on the world.”
Unfortunately, including violent and evil actions as something any (‘normal’) woman would
actively choose, strongly contradicts the hegemonic construction of the woman as a mother
and a ‘giver of life’. At most women have been acknowledged supportive roles during war,
such as taking upon themselves traditionally masculine roles in order to complement the
absence of men in the local and regional contexts (ibid.).
Masculinity and femininity are both normative ideals which have evolved over time and space
and have resulted in conceptualizations which includes both plurality and hierarchy and is
now widely acknowledged within the scholarly community (Connell & Messerschmidt, 2005:
835; Jones, 2006: 462). In modern times, military forces, protection and violence has largely
been dominated by men and masculinity, because of the constructed interrelation between
21
masculinity and militarism argued to have been necessary in order to legitimize violence in
the name of protection of the ‘Motherland’ (Moser & Clark, 2001: 9; Jones, 2006: 454;
Skjelsbæk, 2001: 61). This is particularly evident in media, where women have been limited
to a few roles in conflict even though the reality might have been experienced differently
(Skjelsbæk, 2001: 52ff.; Salla, 2001: 71). Even women who enter these militarized settings
are expected to make a claim to masculinity, rather than fulfilling, developing and
understanding their own militarization within femininity (Via, 2010: 44; Simic, 2010: 190).
Nevertheless, Inger Skjelsbæk (2001), researcher at the International Peace Research Institute
in Oslo (PRIO), has provided three categories of representations of femininity derived from
women’s own accounts in three different contexts of armed conflict, which can be useful in
the analysis of female representations in media. These categories are victimized femininity,
liberated femininity, and lastly, conservative femininity. Victimized femininity is
characterized by vulnerability caused by the loss of the male members of the community, and
as women they become symbols for the ethnic group they represent. The grieving mother,
helpless and passive, serves as an illustration of this type of femininity (ibid.: 55f.). Liberated
femininity, on the other hand, spring out of contexts where the ideology of liberation is a main
factor in legitimizing violence and where men and women are united in the battles against the
enemy. Women perceive themselves to be liberated during conflict from previous gender
structures, and women’s participation in combat is considered as a token of equality, hence
women’s participation serves a double agenda (ibid.: 57f.), which is not necessarily embodied
in the society in post-conflict times (Eliatamby, 2011: 49). Lastly, conservative femininity
does not exclude women as soldiers or perpetrators of violence, but is marked by that women
seize the opportunity in a gender-conservative way. In other words, women take part in battle
but choose not to do the same things as the men. Instead they develop feminine ways to
conduct the acts of warfare. Similarly to liberated femininity, the efforts of women come to
symbolize that everyone is needed against the enemy, but there is no underlying agenda of
women’s emancipation or liberation. Rather, they fill the need of numbers, adding to the
conflict with (wo)manpower and emphasize loyalty to the husband, the community, and the
state (Skjelsbæk, 2001: 59-61).
These three categories are by no means a representation of actual reality in regards to women
and their role in conflict, but serve an analytical purpose in which empirical reality can be
abstracted and made sense of. Most importantly, the constructions of the two groups of
women in focus in this study do not necessarily reflect any of the lived experiences of them or
22
other women involved in Syria today. The news media representations of them are adapted to
contextually fit the discursive practices of Sweden, the UK and the USA, which is where I
argue these women are judged according to Western standards (and Western women). The
conceptual outline of discourse and media suggest theoretical presumptions on which this
study is based, that is, the powerful practices at work and the potentially dangerous pitfalls of
reductionist constructions, whilst postcolonial feminist theory and gender in conflict rather
sets the analytical lens of which the representations of the women will be understood as a
complement to that of CDA.
23
4. Methodology
Discourse analysis is a qualitative strategy of inquiry (Creswell, 2009: 44) and is essentially
social constructivist (see chapter three). The strength of approaching the issue with an
inherently social constructivist view is that it conceptualizes the possibility for change
necessary to Peace and Conflict scholars, especially those adopting a feminist gender
perspective in research (Skjelsbæk, 2001: 52). Considering discourse’s dialectical relationship
with the social world, discourse analysis is generally of interest to social scientists. Thus
choosing to deal with Western representations of women rather than exploring the women’s
perspectives on the issue is not merely a matter of accessibility. Analyzing representations
such as those dominating the media does not unveil any materiality or lived experiences, but it
does expose value attached to certain roles and expectations in relation to normative ideals
(Mohanty, 1988: 68). This is why I am analyzing written and visual representations of these
two seemingly opposing categories of women, not the women’s agency itself.
As noted, using the method of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) includes both
methodological and theoretical considerations, and I have done my best to outline the basic
theoretical assumptions in the previous chapter. In this chapter I will focus on the
methodological tools used in the analytical stages, which is Fairclough’s three dimensional
model with complementary considerations derived from Gillian Rose’s methods of discourse
analysis on visual data. Fairclough’s CDA is suitable for discourse analysis in media, and he
has himself dedicated much time to analyze news media specifically (see Fairclough, 1995),
which profitably provides me with an extensive set of examples on how to conduct the
analysis. Lastly, I will in this chapter take the opportunity to reflect upon my role as a
researcher as well as the material used.
24
with genre (ibid.). The central genre in this study is the news genre, which refers to the
specific conventions relevant for how a text should be structured within this discursive order.
Each communicative event can be argued to have three dimensions in total. The
communicative event is necessarily some form of text, be it written or spoken, visual, or as in
the case of most news articles in focus of this study, multimodal (1995: 54f.). The
communicative event is also a discursive practice, which refers to the processes of production
and consumption of the text and thus places it within one or several discursive orders through
the concepts of intertextuality and interdiscursivity. Lastly, the communicative event as part
of a discourse becomes as a result an expression of sociocultural practice. These three
dimensions make up the three essential building blocks of Norman Fairclough’s three-
dimensional model of analysis.
For each communicative event, all three dimensions must be included in CDA, otherwise the
study risks to stray and fall under other similar methods of analysis. As mentioned, I will in
this research analyze multimodal texts and by that I mean news media articles which include
both written text and visual component(s), usually one or several photographs. Photographs
are frequently used in this discursive order because of the potentially dangerous assumption
that photography is ‘a window into reality’ (Rose, 2001: 15; Griffin, 2010: 7). Furthermore,
critical approach to imagery includes addressing both cultural practices and the cultural
meanings the images produce in different sites of meaning making (Rose, 2001).
25
When analyzing the text, the researcher focuses on the text’s linguistic structure. This means,
more practically, to identify elements and their relation to the other elements in the text, and
consider how they together generate meaning. A properly executed discourse analysis is in
addition sensitive to both what is in the text, and what is excluded. To be able to reach the aim
of CDA practically then requires of the researcher to formulate questions that allow for this,
and being newly introduced to this method I am guided by Norman Fairclough’s own
questions (1995: 201ff.; see Appendix I). However, this only includes the written text and
does not include the photographs positioned with the text. To modify the questions
accordingly, Gillian Rose (2001) suggests considering the image’s content, color and spatial
organization (see Appendix I – Visual analysis). During this stage of the analysis, I will focus
my attention on how the two categories of women are constructed linguistically, who is
entitled to agency and what attributes are central in the construction.
Discursive practice is separated from the text during the analysis, even though it is inevitable
when analyzing the texts structure and meaning-making to not touch upon the production and
consumption of the text (Winther Jørgensen & Phillips, 2000: 74f.). But the dimension of
discursive practice is used to explore how the producers of texts make use of other discourses
and texts to generate certain meaning (Fairclough, 1995: 58ff.). This is summarized in two
concepts – interdiscursivity and intertextuality. This type of analysis aims to “unravel the
various genres and discourses […] which are articulated together in the text” (ibid.: 61).
Whereas linguistic analysis of the text tends toward being more descriptive in nature,
intertextual analysis tends to be interpretative as it focuses on the discursive dimension which
serves as the link between the multimodal text and its sociocultural context (ibid.: 59-61).
Additionally, what is found during the linguistic analysis can be used as evidence in the
intertextual stage, but is during this stage interpreted so that the text can be positioned in
relation to its order of discourse (ibid.: 61f.). To do this, I will then make use of the linguistic
constructions in relation to the gendered narratives created by Inger Skjelsbæk (2001)
elaborated on in chapter 3.4.
26
Phillips, 2000: 75; Fairclough, 1995), and to amend this issue I complemented the theoretical
framework of CDA with postcolonial feminist theory outlined in the previous chapter.
The solution within social constructivist academia is reflexivity, which suggests reflecting on
the researcher’s perspectives that might have influenced the way questions are asked or how
the material is interpreted (ibid.: 240). At the very least, reflexivity facilitates reflection on
own bias through the continuous and outspoken motivation to why choices are made in the
research process (Winther Jørgensen & Phillips, 2000: 112). Reflexivity goes hand in hand
with validity in qualitative research, seeing as this transparency regarding personal bias
supports other researchers to determine whether, how, or to what extent this might have
affected research outcomes. Critical theory, including CDA, highlights that all research “is
authored by a raced, gendered, classed, and politically oriented individual” (Creswell, 2009:
112), and postcolonial critique towards academia must necessarily extend to the author. I too
partake in the (re)production of certain discourses with imperialist implications, and strive to
reflect upon my own use of potentially problematic linguistics (see Fairclough, 2008: 813) as
best I can. Thus the analytical framework constructed for the data (see chapter three) is
composed so as to support me as a researcher to acknowledge my own biases, and create
awareness of things otherwise distant to me because of my sociocultural background as a
‘Westerner’ myself. Theory in this research process is therefore used both as an explanatory
medium for attitudes and behaviors (ibid.: 111), and as a theoretical lens in order to
27
complement my subjective stance as a researcher. Furthermore, Winther Jørgensen and
Phillips (2000: 92) suggest what they refer to as critical awareness of the use of language in
the study, which means to write, at the very least, concluding remarks in such a way that the
social groups of interest of the study could read and understand the text. This does not mean
translating any part of the text into their mother tongue (ibid.), rather, it merely suggests to
make the language as accessible as possible beyond the academic realm.
4.3 Material
4.3.1 Reflections on Primary Sources
The data has been selected based on accessibility and language skills of the researcher, as the
scope of the research is rather short, and to direct accountability I prefer not to rely on an
interpreter for the stages of the analysis itself. These are two main considerations in the
selection of data and consequently narrowed down my options to English or Swedish news
reports accessible online.
Limiting myself to influential news media in the UK and the USA, and excluding other
English-speaking countries, was based on a few considerations. The United Kingdom is a
previous colonial power since long identifying as belonging to the idea of Western Europe.
Additionally, UK media houses generally reach a larger audience than for instance Australian
news media (Fairclough, 1995: 36ff.). The USA similarly reaches out to a great audience both
nationally and internationally, and the country is since decades regarded as a powerful
international actor with considerable influence over sociopolitical and financial processes
globally (ibid.). In addition, the USA happens to currently have an interesting political tension
with its NATO-ally Turkey in regards to supporting the Kurdish militias in Syria (Gupta,
2016: 43). Sweden on the other hand can be considered as a contrast in many ways from both
the UK and the USA. For one, Swedish media does not reach out to such a large audience,
and secondly, Sweden has long been considered a role model when it comes to social issues,
and particularly women’s rights (Nilsson & Lövkrona, 2015: 30ff.). In many ways, Sweden
has been portrayed as a feminist country, even though this is debatable, and mainly shows in
comparison with other nation-states (ibid.).
Among the most read daily newspapers, two have been chosen in each country respectively,
based partly on distribution but also on available material on the two categories of women.
Choosing two is because of the scarce and varied type of reports dedicated to the YPJ. The
scope included 2013 to 2015 reports seeing as both groups have gotten the most news
28
attention during this period. Using this sort of purposive sampling and selecting a few
representative texts is common in qualitative research, in particular when the topic is not well-
researched (Creswell, 2009: 268-269).
The YPJ is greatly underrepresented in media in comparison to the Muhaajirat, which resulted
in either choosing material where the categories of women are either central or merely
mentioned. I chose to analyze articles in which they were the focus of the news material, thus
excluding an exploration of the absence of them. I proceeded with selecting what was
available on the YPJ, and then based on that selected similar material on the Muhaajirat in
each newspaper to facilitate consistency despite the varied structure and format. The variation
could be argued to weaken aspects of the study, however, when engaging in discourse
analysis, this variation can be considered a strength as they are all produced within the same
discursive order. The important thing is to be aware of the differences between the texts and
to account for this during the analytical stages.
In American English, a news report refers to both the shorter type of ‘objective’ text, and the
typically longer and more illustrative type of news reportage. Reportage belongs mainly to
British English, but will be used here in order to differ the two types in order to avoid
confusion. The last type of text is opinion pieces, which either comes in the form of an op-ed
(opposite to the editorial) or in political blogs which is increasingly popular for news
agencies, particularly by news media producers in the US. Because of the argumentative
nature of an opinion piece, many voices appear to be brought forth and the textual elements
are generally more careful in phrasing ‘truths’, however, who is allowed to submit an opinion
piece (mainly journalists or scholars) greatly tells of the hierarchization of voices elaborated
on in section 3.2.
The two first types of text are aimed at being ‘objective’, but news reportage allows for a
more dramatic language and a longer format. In this category of news reportage, I have also
included photographic reportages, which might have shorter written text, but plenty of
photographs. The photographs are illustrative and, as argued in section 3.2 and 4.1, make
claims towards an ‘objective’ truth. The photographic reportages are most commonly also
included in the category of news (domestic or international) and usually not among for
instance opinion which makes them more appropriate to treat as news reportage.
29
In total, 12 multimodal texts will be analyzed, published by six different news agencies
online. These are Dagens Nyheter (DN) and Svenska Dagbladet (SvD) (SWE), The Guardian
and The Independent (UK), and New York Times and The Washington Post (USA). Links to
the texts are provided in a separate section in References and for more detailed information on
data selection processes see Appendix II.
30
5. Analysis
5.1 The Textual Dimension
The textual dimension of the analysis is focused on mapping out linguistic elements which
show how discourses are manifested textually (Winther Jørgensen & Phillips, 2000: 87). As
mentioned, it is mainly descriptive, but overlaps with the discursive practices thus making it
to a lesser extent interpretative as well (see chapter four). I have paid particular attention to
the construction of women’s agency and claims to ‘truth’.
These components all emphasize agency and promote an understanding of the photographs as
glimpses of the reality they are depicting, rather than being staged, thus emphasizing the
photographs as ‘objective’ and ‘truthful’ (Griffin, 2010: 8ff.). They are always depicted with
31
their weaponry, whether these are hanging unused on their shoulder (SvD, 2015-05-24), held
up in an active position (WP, 2015-12-23; NYT, 2014-10-13) or even stationed somewhere in
the out of focused background (See for instance images 7 and 8 in GNM, 2015-09-11). They
are never absent, but ranges from active use to ‘ready-to-use’ – always close at hand.
There is one exception: a female commander (whose military status is apparent through the
adjoining text) (DN, 2013-05-12). Note that the movement is blurred, making it seem like the
movement is fast, steady and determined.
32
The chess game can be interpreted in many, not necessarily exclusive ways. For instance, it
can be understood as portraying intellectual or mental training (the headline of the news piece
is “Here, they are preparing for battle at the frontline”2, DN, 2013-05-12, my translation) and
perhaps even as practice in strategic thinking in regards to their upcoming battles. It can also
be understood within a gendered narrative where the women are advancing in a male
dominated territory, such as the military. Nonetheless, she is portrayed as an agent
committing an act towards another. Textually, the same active position is reinforced through
phrasings such as: “And she [‘Avesta’, a nom de guerre for a YPJ fighter interviewed in the
text, my note] and her fellow fighters are well prepared to take on ISIS as a result, she says.”
(NYT, 2014-10-13). The female factions of the Kurdish militias are understood as entangled,
and the YPJ and their Iraqi counterpart are treated as inspiration and role models for other
females joining the battle against ISIS, such as Yazidi women, which is most evident in
GNM’s (2015-09-11) news reportage.
The female noncombatants, on the other hand, are mainly described as lacking agency, often
portrayed as victims of violence of ISIS or patriarchal structures of their own society: “He
[the photographer, my note] took partial portraits of women who were kidnapped, tortured
and raped by Isis […]. On top of the trauma, most deny they were raped because of the
culture of shame around sex” (ibid.). This is not the combatants only contrast. Many times the
Western Muhaajirat are used as the passive opposite to the Kurdish female fighters’ active
position in the texts as demonstrated in the following “The women’s [YPJ’s, my note]
military success is a far cry from the role that would be ascribed to them under Isis rule,
where Muslim girls can be ‘legitimately’ married to militants from the age of nine […]”
(IND, 2015-12-09). The lives of civilian Kurdish women are given space in Jake Flanagin’s
opinion piece (NYT, 2014-10-13), however, they are not given a prominent position and is
quickly belittled by the prominent finishing sentence: “Life for Kurdish women may not be
perfect – but they are making strides towards equality that are anything but ‘symbolic’”. With
this sentence, he equalizes the military successes of the female militias with tangible “strides
towards equality”, after just describing a very problematic context for noncombatant women
with the help of ‘experts’ of his own choosing, thus effectively placing his own ‘objective’
view on the top of the hierarchy without including the voice of a noncombatant woman
currently living in Kurdish society.
2
” Här tränar de för strid vid fronten” [Original citation]
33
The YPJ are explicitly allowed to reject the victimization in interviews but also in
summarizations and interpretations made by journalists and scholars. One example is: “’Their
[the female fighters, my note] decisions are in their hands, no longer in the hands of their
families or their brothers’” (Yaghobzadeh in GNM, 2015-09-11). In addition, they are
generally constructed as linguistic agents who wants to challenge traditional roles ascribed to
women:
- The traditional image of the woman in war has been the one who flees, the one who provides
food, health care and take care of children, or the mother who sacrifices her sons for the cause
and gives birth to new warriors… That image, clarifies Aryen Gunes, the YPJ want to
challenge3. (SvD, 2015-05-24, my translation)
Yet male relatives (and their consent) are of interest in the news pieces, as in for instance the
photo from DN (2013-05-12) depicted below, where a male figure lingers in the background
with a boy. An example textually can be found in SvD (2015-05-24, my translation) where the
interviewer explicitly asks the YPJ fighter: “What does your male relatives say about you
fighting?”4
3
“Den traditionella bilden av kvinnan i krig har varit hon som flyr, hon som sörjer för mat, sjukvård och tar hand
om barn, eller modern som offrar sina söner för saken och föder nya krigare… Den bilden, förtydligar Aryen
Gunes, vill YPJ göra upp med.” [Original citation]
4
” Vad säger dina manliga släktningar om att du krigar?” [Original citation]
34
Another interesting element is that they are described as “unmarried” (WP, 2015-12-23) or
choosing not to marry (DN, 2013-05-12), when they are not allowed to marry because they
will then be expected to leave the force, which is a rule that only applies to the female fighters
(Gupta, 2016: 43). This restriction is completely absent from all texts, thus promotes the idea
that the life in YPJ is permeated by freedom of choice and independence. With this said, the
fighters are generally framed as women with floral scarves and dreams of home (see photo
below, clarified by the textual content, in SvD, 2015-05-24) that transgress societal norms of
their (non-Western) patriarchal society through entering the military force and consequently
transform into a source of pride for their male relatives when they have managed to get used
to the idea of a female fighter.
5
In SvD and DN, they use the Swedish translation ”locka”.
35
of actively participating or, again, choosing to participate as in this quote from the NYT
(2015-01-21): “Terrorists are strategic about using women, in increasingly chilling ways”.
A continuous emphasis on them being “young” (DN, 2015-02-05; GNM, 2014-11-06; SvD,
2014-11-28) adds to the idea of their passive position, under the eyes (and in need) of a
guardian. The three following examples are additionally headlines, suggesting that the youth
of the women needs to be highlighted: “Why young American women are joining ISIS” (WP,
2015-11-17); “Young Swedish women are joining IS” (SvD, 2014-11-28, my translation)6;
“Women in IS: 9 year olds can be married off”7 (DN, 2015-02-05, my translation). In
contrast, the age of the YPJ fighters are typically expressed in numbers and even when their
youth is acknowledged as problematic, they are seen as “empowered” (GNM, 2015-09-110)
and their choice to fight is seen as a mature decision based on “necessity” (ibid.).
ISIS, jihadists and terrorists are a manipulative force disguised in mystery, without
photographs from Western sources and no direct quotations available from people, be it
migrants or locals, women or men, in these anti-West movements. The few ways their
opinions are voiced are through social media and private texts by women of the Western
Muhaajirat to their friends (GNM, 2014-09-06), through Quilliam Foundation’s publication of
the Al-Khanssaa Manifesto (DN, 2015-02-05; NYT, 2015-01-21; WP, 2015-11-17), or other
sources of propaganda published and distributed by ISIS’ many media associates and their
followers, such as the photograph below originally published by Al-Furqan Media and
republished in DN (2015-02-05).
6
” Unga svenskor ansluter sig till IS” [Original citation]
7
” Kvinnor i IS: 9-åringar kan giftas bort” [Original citation]
36
Terrorists can thus be perceived as generally male, fanatically religious and aggressive in a
violent and physical manner and it is commonly expressed through the use of religious words
(“jihadists”), and the passive position of the Western Muhaajirat as a group, all emphasized
by the photograph above. But, what the Western Muhaajirat and the Al-Khanssaa brigade
have showed, are that ISIS, jihadists and terrorists are not solely men. Women do commit or
support violent acts as well, but those who do are treated differently from the comprised
category of passive women. Instead, female perpetrators (from a Western perspective) are
mentioned by their real names thus effectively turning some into individual exceptions from
the norm. In addition, they are often linguistically positioned as agents as in the following
quotes: “She [Aqsa Mahmood, my note] tells her followers everything from what to pack
[…]” (GNM, 2014-09-06). “In fresh print, female jihadists [the Al-Khanssaa Brigade, my
note] explain women’s roles within the Islamic state”8 (DN, 2015-02-05, my translation).
Aqsa Mahmood is the reoccurring example of this (GNM, 2014-11-06; IND, 2015-06-28).
Noteworthy, the acts on social media (and texting) by these women are portrayed as
something peculiar: “They [the social media posts, my note] are a jumble of religious
quotations, glorifications of murder, banal chat and internet memes – complete with
Instagram-posted pictures of sunsets and ubiquitous photos of cats“ (GNM, 2014-09-06).
Another example, positioned even more prominently, can be found in the same news piece
(ibid.):
8
” I en färsk skrift beskriver kvinnliga jihadister kvinnors roll inom Islamiska staten.” [Original citation]
37
A young woman cheerfully tweets two British friends, ‘I’m making pancakes, and there’s
Nutella, come up in a bit’. Her friends tease each other in response: ‘come b4 I finish dem
mwhaha :p’; ‘oi … you have my back dont snake it’. Punctuated by emojis and slang, it’s
hardly a sinister exchange, until it becomes clear that all three have joined the Islamic State
(Isis) – and are using their social media accounts to encourage other women to join them in
Syria.
It seems as though this contrast is problematic for the writer. These women make claims to
being ‘normal (Western) teenagers’, which they are not entitled to, as they symbolically have
turned their backs on the ‘West’. The acts on social media of many young people all through
Western societies, becomes deceitful when committed by the Muhaajirat despite their strong
ties to ‘Western’ culture.
The Al-Khanssaa Brigade is also constructed as an exception – they use violence towards
other women, who “[…] may tweet about practising shooting or post photos of their guns, but
experts say there is no evidence they are allowed to fight” (GNM, 2014-11-06). The deviating
behavior of the Al-Khanssaa Brigade is further emphasized by photography. The first photo
below on shows the Brigade and is the only photograph of them in the news material
published by a female recruiter under the name “Ummu Fidaa” (SvD, 2014-11-28), while the
other, informal and private, photograph (GNM, 2014-11-06) is more representative for the
images commonly used in the news material to depict the Western Muhaajirat.
38
“Experts” (GNM, 2014-11-06; WP, 2015-11-17) try to explain the phenomena of female
radicalization and their knowledge is complemented by the family’s experiences, particularly
the parents’. Aqsa Mahmood’s parents explain their daughter as typically female (“sweet,
intelligent and peaceful” GNM, 2014-11-06) but, as opposed to the pride that the YPJ
seemingly bring to their male relatives, Mahmood is a “disgrace” (IND, 2015-06-28). The
Western Muhaajirat is generally a source of confusion, not only to their parents but to society
as a whole, and generates questions such as the following from SvD (2014-11-28, my
translation): “Why do young women abandon their family and the safety in Sweden in order
to join an organization which is marked as terrorists by the UN?”9
9
”Varför överger unga kvinnor sin familj och tryggheten i Sverige för att ansluta till en av FN terrorstämplad
organisation?” [Original citation]
39
5.2.1 Intertextuality
Intertextuality has in a sense become more tangible in news media production online, and
plays a key role in the hierarchization of voices. Different texts, which the author of the news
piece refers to explicitly, are merely a click away for the reader, neatly integrated not to
disrupt the readability of the piece (see for instance WP, 2015-12-23). What becomes
interesting with this technological function are which pieces are entitled to this easy access
and how they effectively reinforce certain sociocultural norms of whose voice is privileged, or
in other words, who is considered to be qualified to engage in knowledge production. The
power relations between voices are less evident, especially if the reader choose not to engage
with the referred texts, because then officials and civilians are not competing in the same
manner for space and prominent positions in the text. Instead, reinforcing the arguments made
in the news piece takes place beyond the text. Thus the discursive practice which reinforces
the existing asymmetrical power relation between the producer and the consumer, and
between civilians and officials represented in the text (see section 3.2), are effectively
reproduced.
This technical function also becomes an effective marketing strategy, where the
photographers and authors refers to own product(s) as in GNM (2015-09-11), where the
photographer’s current work and previous experience get notable space. In addition, several
websites provide recommendations of which texts the reader should consume next, i.e. which
texts that the news producer deems relevant for the consumer (for instance IND, 2014-09-06;
SvD, 2015-05-24; WP, 2015-11-17). In the print screen below, derived from NYT (2015-11-
17), the red circles are added by me in order to highlight examples of strategies.
40
Less evident as marketing strategy are the intertextual references to other news agencies and
organizations, which mainly (re)produce similar constructions of for instance ISIS as the
ultimate Other (violent, religious, barbaric, savage). The tendency is to refer the reader to
other well-known news agencies, the national scholarly community or an NGO engaging in
the matter (see for example DN, 2015-02-05; GNM, 2014-09-06). That they refer to solely
English sources (some have the option of choosing a different language when arriving on the
website) are not particularly problematic considering that the text one starts with is English
(with exception of the Swedish material), however, what becomes problematic is the
reference to sources which contribute to the same universalist discourses as the authors’. Even
the few times where a reference is made to for instance the Al-Khanssaa manifesto (Al-
Khanssaa Brigade, 2015), based on a religious fundamentalist and anti-Western ideology, the
text is found on a “counter-extremism” think tank’s website, which explicitly promotes
“liberal democratic values” and dominating news agencies such as BBC News and CNN
(quilliamfoundation.org/about/). In addition, the person who translated the manifesto for the
think tank, offers an analysis which is added to the manifesto and positioned before the parts
of the text which is produced by Al-Khanssaa, and through that privileging the words of the
Western man over the actual authors of the manifesto (see Al-Khanssaa Brigade, 2015).
Consequently, meaning risks not only being lost in translation, the ideology of the Other is
only referred to within the hegemonic neoliberal framework which reinforces the dominant
construction in the news material of the Western Muhaajirat as irrational, naïve and young.
Even though family and the religious community are allowed to share their perceptions and
experiences on the Western Muhaajirat (see section 5.1.2) it is not quite fair to expect them to
41
understand or provide insight to the radicalization process of these women, because a devoted
Muslim and a radicalized Islamist should not be assumed to share the same views of the ideal
society or the means to get there.
Intertextuality of the YPJ texts tends to be lower than in those speculating on the Western
Muhaajirat, probably because the fighters themselves are interviewed. Sometimes the
interviews are intertextual, in the sense that another journalist from the same news media
house has been ‘in the field’, or, as is the case with the famous quote “ISIS are afraid of girls”
(IND, 2015-12-09), from another news media producer. This particular quote is difficult to
trace throughout news media because of its frequent use even in the Swedish news material,
thus it is a great example of intertextuality between news media producers. It shows their
tendency to rely heavily on each other (the Swedish news media texts also rely on UK or US
sources, see for instance DN, 2015-02-05 and SvD, 2015-05-24) when there is lack of access
and knowledge because of armed conflict. The reuse of this particular quote (GNM, 2015-09-
11; IND, 2015-12-09; NYT, 2014-10-13; SvD, 2015-05-24) in text is rarely questioned (an
exception can be found in NYT, 2015-01-21) and it is always framed as an insight shared by
the young female soldiers who are interviewed. The truthfulness of the quote can thus be
argued to be reinforced because of both the maintenance of the status quo between officials
(“experts”) and civilians, and for its dramatic effect in the construction of ISIS as the Other.
5.2.2 Interdiscursivity
Interdiscursivity in the analyzed news material is fairly low and does not strive from the
typical conventions of news media as a discursive order. Jayne Huckerby’s “When Women
Become Terrorists” (NYT, 2015-01-21) is the most apparent interdiscursive among the texts,
where her scholarly background becomes apparent in the way she structures the text and the
critical and advocatory stance she expresses. The following example is the finishing line of
her piece: “To fight them [terrorists, my note], we have to move past simplistic assumptions
about gender and terror and get serious about helping women and girls who are on this deadly
path, as well as their would-be victims.” It advocates a more efficient approach in dealing
with the problem of female terrorists, and is highly critical of the way the West so far has
been responding to the increase of women joining terrorist forces. However, she, like other
authors, presupposes the existence and a general coherent definition of terrorism. The
examples of Boko Haram, female jihadists and of course ISIS directs the understanding
somewhat. ISIS are, considering the choice of primary material, central in the construction of
the terrorist throughout the majority of the texts. This reflects a specific Western narrative,
42
which became more apparent after the Bush-administration declared war on terror, where the
terrorist has become mainly a religiously oriented, irrational and aggressive savage, who’s
“target is women” (IND, 2015-12-09).
Some binaries are more or less explicitly expressed and provide insight on the dominant
discourses, which have made possible the constructions of the two categories of women in the
news texts. These can be summarized into collective/individual, active/passive,
liberated/restricted and religious/secular. Women as a collective, whether part of the Kurdish
society or the ISIS, are, as argued above, typically constructed as passive victims of violence.
This is in stark contrast to the combatants of the YPJ, who are generally understood as
protagonist agents, and the perceived perpetrators of the Western Muhaajirat (mainly Aqsa
Mahmood and the Al-Khanssaa Brigade), who are portrayed as deviations and antagonists.
‘Innocent’ women in these non-Western societies can thus be understood as reduced to a
collective, whilst the YPJ and the female perpetrators of the Muhaajirat are understood as part
of a collective, but are constructed so as to maintain their individuality. This individuality
allows them to become actors with the freedom of choice central to liberalism, and which the
collective category of women is not perceived to have. They are unfree and restricted by
Kurdish patriarchal structures (SvD, 2015-05-24), conflict (GNM, 2015-09-11) or Islamist
agents (IND, 2015-12-09) in the texts. The YPJ are an active force moving forward,
progressing towards a secular society (religion is left out from the construction of this group)
with the central goal of women’s emancipation, while the female perpetrators of the Western
Muhaajirat are actively regressing towards an anti-Western backwards society, where
women’s roles are restricted by religion and the patriarchal structures that comes with. It
appears as though secularism is highly valued in Western societies, seeing as it reinforces
claims to knowledge production as objective, rational and independent, something that is
highly valued in all countries in focus of this study, and has been for a long time.
The “sedentary” (IND, 2015-12-09) roles that the Western Muhaajirat are entering in ISIS –
“as homemakers, wives and mothers” (ibid.) – are deemed problematic in contrast to the
YPJ’s emancipatory project. The Muhaajirat is perceived to be restricted to these roles rather
than actively choosing them (DN, 2015-02-05; GNM, 2014-09-06; IND, 2015-12-09) while
the choices of the YPJ is treated as more or less self-explanatory (DN, 2013-05-02; NYT,
2014-10-13). The Muhaajirat’s claims to freedom of choice is quickly disregarded through
treating them as young and in the need of guidance as described in section 5.1.2. A few of the
news pieces acknowledge that there can be another perception of freedom than that
43
constructed in the majority of the texts. For instance, in GNM (2014-09-06), Melanie Smith,
an ‘official’ voice from King’s College International Centre, comments that “[…] no woman
she has spoken to is considering coming home. ‘They see it as emigrating to a better life.
They say they feel free’”. Unfortunately, these comments are not positioned prominently and
are not allowed the same authoritarian voice as the ‘objective’ journalist, but they still show
that there is some friction in how these women can be constructed and understood.
Combining traditional feminine roles with the lack of choice in non-Western contexts
(emphasized by the construction of the YPJ fighter’s rejection of marriage) risks devaluing
unpaid work in the home and traditional feminine roles. Instead, it glorifies the violent role of
the YPJ, which seemingly promotes masculinity tied to the existence of nation-states. For
instance, the fighters are visually depicted with their weapons (a phallic symbol of militarized
masculinity), but there are always feminine components present, such as flowers, pink or
floral patterns on fabrics, or just that the women always look surprisingly clean, which is not
the case in images of male fighters (see comparison below from DN, 2013-05-02).
44
The represented discourses are slightly more diverse, and includes the extremist Islamism
promoted by Al-Khanssaa. But as highlighted earlier, they are all represented through the lens
of Western feminism and an imperialist idea of ‘appropriate’ development, where (Western)
women’s emancipation is used as a yardstick. In regards to the YPJ, militarism and
democratic confederalism are fitted to be equalized to that of Western neoliberalism and
egalitarianism. They are perceived as sharing ‘our’ basic values such as gender equality and
human rights. What is much less mentioned are their firm anti-capitalist stance (it is implied
in SvD, 2015-05-24; WP, 2015-12-23), which, similar to the discourse of the Muhaajirat, can
be argued to be a threat to the ‘West’ if successful and sustainable.
In sum, interdiscursivity is generally low and does not apt for much of a discursive power
struggle, which suggest that the texts mainly reproduce hegemonic discourses surrounding
femininity, masculinity and knowledge. The combination of capitalism, individualism,
universalism and Western feminism contributes to an Orientalist framework, which
discursively affect how women and development should look like in order to be legitimately
recognized by the international community. However, the complexity of the roles of both of
these categories of women, in text and in reality, forces more complex and creative ways of
discursive practices which might facilitate changes when these ‘phenomena’ are more
accessible and well-researched in the future.
45
political and social outcomes of the discursive practices and whether the discursive practices
reinforce and conceal the asymmetrical power relations of interest to this study, or if they
reveal the asymmetry creatively, consequently offering possibilities for change (Winther
Jørgensen & Phillips, 2000: 85ff.).
All the texts are clearly connected to sociocultural practices such as globalization and the
marketization of public space discussed in chapter three. The marketization is visible in the
possibilities of ‘sharing’ the news piece on social media, the promotional elements mentioned
and the presence of advertisements surrounding the texts online (see section 5.2.1). All these
three elements enforce a construction of the audience as consumers with the power of the
customer within a capitalist society. The power, however, is very limited and it gives, in a
way, a false sense of agency by this possibility of participating in the promotion of a certain
newspaper or article. Combining this with the façade of objectivity in the news reports and
reportages, there is a tendency to rely heavily on the content and calls for little action and
responsibility regarding critical reading and source criticism. Thus the authority of the news
producer can be said to remain unchallenged.
The YPJ and the Western Muhaajirat are posed as opposites, either in the active/passive
binary, or as protagonists/antagonists when both are positioned as active. This has clear
implications on how a Third World woman should progress, think and act in a globalized
world. In many ways, the women of the YPJ are constructed as if they are constantly striving
to realize hegemonic masculinity in the flesh. They are perceived as rational, independent and
brave defenders of their national identity (the Kurdish, which territorially is not realized yet)
who knows when it is necessary to kill – i.e. committing ‘civilized’ and ‘legitimate’ violence.
They are (successfully?) entering the domain of masculinity, yet still maintain some
femininity (through the floral scarves, long hair, etc.), similarly to how the ideal Other of the
West should maintain their authenticity but adapt some ‘basic universal values’ in the
construction of cultural identity (see section 3.3). Thus the women of the YPJ fit perfectly into
the narrative of the liberated femininity as described by Skjelsbæk (2001; see section 3.4).
The Western Muhaajirat, on the other hand, seem to easily fit into the image of the
backwards, religious Third World woman (see section 3.3), but because of their ties to the
West they are not easily constructed as such. This is why the inclusion of the ideology of the
Ultimate Other (ISIS) and emphasizing young age are necessary. The women in the YPJ are
often explicitly positioned opposite to the religious fundamentalist ideology of Western
Muhaajirat and women in ISIS generally (see 5.1.1), yet the YPJ is generally excluded from
46
the texts about the Western Muhaajirat. As for the Western Muhaajirat, the constant
highlighting of their young age and the references to teenage behavior make way for
legitimization of the paternalistic project of ‘liberating’ women for their own sake. When the
passive role of victimization is not enough in the construction, they are perceived as
antagonistic deviations from the other women – i.e. perpetrators of illegitimate violence, yet
remaining within the narrative of conservative femininity (see Skjelsbæk, 2001; section 3.4).
Thus, they all are in some way restricted, either by their own conservative ideal or by the
violence of men (and women), whether they know it or not, whilst the YPJ are liberated and
‘free’ women. What is completely lacking is a feminist discourse which promotes femininity
as being as valuable as masculinity, hence the hegemonic European gender order is
reproduced through the constructions of these women and the feminization (in an orientalist
manner) of the East continues. Instead, it appears as though now the ideal woman, similarly to
the ideal man, is being constructed on the frontline – a both symbolic and physical place
where social identity is negotiated (Steans, 2008: 165).
In sum, the unproblematic use of the ‘war on terror’ narrative (see section 5.1.2) indicates a
social standpoint similar to that of clash of civilizations by Huntington. This in combination
to that above indicates neocolonialist and imperialist discursive legitimization of ‘Western’
sociocultural practice, and that the discursive power of the West remains fairly unchallenged
from within.
47
6. Conclusions
This chapter summarizes the results from the analysis into general conclusions, and answers
the main research question through the sub questions outlined in chapter 1.2. Lastly, I
dedicate some space to reflect upon what this study has contributed with to Peace and Conflict
Studies specifically, and social science in general.
6.1 The Constructions of the YPJ and the Western Muhaajirat of ISIS
The construction of the female fighters of the YPJ can mainly be understood as an expression
of liberated femininity, where they are perceived to have a double agenda consisting of the
Kurdish liberation struggle, but largely fighting for their own emancipation from patriarchal
structures in non-Western society (i.e. the Middle East). The ideology of liberation legitimizes
their violence in the news material, and they are seen as role models in regards to gender
equality despite their ties to the PKK. Instead of acknowledging the differences between their
revolutionary agenda and the Western feminism expressed by the authors, similarities are
emphasized, for instance human rights and gender equality. In addition to this, their current
enemy is the same as ‘ours’, thus the constructions of these women reinforce ISIS (and
terrorists) as the ultimate Other of the West.
The Western Muhaajirat is as a collective category usually understood within the narrative of
victimized femininity, however, instead of the loss of a male family member, they have rather
lost their way. They are usually described as passive young victims of radicalization,
propaganda, or manipulation by members of ISIS. Their agency is usually denied, while the
agency of the YPJ is constantly emphasized through different linguistic elements. They are
typically reduced to the ‘Third World woman’ – in need of (Western) wisdom and (Western)
liberation. The Western Muhaajirat as individuals (Mahmood) and deviations (Al-Khanssaa)
fit better into the notion of conservative femininity, as they are constructed as violent
antagonists, and indeed the Al-Khanssaa Brigade is accused of physical violent acts. In
addition, their violence is illegitimate and performed in a gender-conservative manner. Even
though Aqsa Mahmood explicitly writes that violence is not for women in ISIS, she is
constructed as manipulative and becomes a perpetrator of violence towards other women
when her recruitment is successful. Al-Khanssaa’s violence is also directed towards other
women to make sure that they comply with codes of conduct in Islamic law. These deviating
exceptional women are effectively separated from the victimized women generally, and are
then more easily constructed as antagonists and members of ISIS.
48
6.2 The Western Narrative
What this suggests, is that women are still mainly understood within traditional gender roles,
and the ‘Western liberated woman’ is still reproduced as the universal norm. Freedom and
liberation for women is equalized to being able to enter the most masculine domain – the
military – and the most impressive thing a woman can do is to fight like a man, or better. This
does not change the devaluation of feminine attributes, but maintains the patriarchal status
quo that no author acknowledges as part of ‘Western’ culture or history. Fighting for ‘non-
universal’ values and joining the ‘wrong’ side of the battle, reduces you to a victim of the
Other’s violence, thus transforming you to an object that needs to be saved from yourself and
others. The news media order of discourse permeating these texts can thus be argued to be
reductionist and sensationalist, yet is meant to be regarded as objective, rational and a mere
representation of the ‘truth’, emphasized and bolstered by the frequent use of photographs.
Additionally, history and sociopolitical relationships are backgrounded or even absent,
especially those concerning problematic choices made by decision-makers in the home
country. Colonial history and imperialism are certainly never mentioned, thus remain in the
distance as something irrelevant and as a ‘thing of the past’.
It becomes evident that the news media productions in focus in this study are produced
through and reproduce the powerful discursive position of the ‘West’. The YPJ and the
Western Muhaajirat are constructed as binary opposites, where the YPJ are understood as the
ideal Other, who manages to balance cultural authenticity and ‘Western’ universal ideas. The
construction of them as the ideal Other reinforce the universalism of Western culture, thus
unfortunately fails to challenge the superiority of Western ‘civilization’ and knowledge
production. The Western Muhaajirat actually becomes more interesting in this light. These are
surely constructed in the light of the ‘Western liberation project’, explicitly carried out in
Afghanistan by the Bush administration (see Cloud, 2004; Thobani 2007; Steans 2008), and
additionally, they provide a necessity for similar action. How this liberation project will be
carried out non-discursively is still a matter of discussion and there is no coherent or unified
strategy for the international community yet. Even though the Western Muhaajirat is generally
robbed of their agency, the deviations pose a challenge for the hegemonic news media houses
under scrutiny in this study, and the friction between them being women, ‘Westerners’ and
‘terrorists’ is not easily dealt with. This suggests that if there will be a discursive shift within
the lifespan of ‘terrorism’, it probably will spring out of the least expected group: The
Western Muhaajirat.
49
6.3 Closing Remarks and Suggestions for Further Research
This study identified a gap in Peace and Conflict literature on women’s agency in the context
of Syria today, and compared Western news media constructions on two opposing categories
of women – the YPJ and the Western Muhaajirat. Even though similar studies have been
conducted previously in other countries permeated by conflict, women in Syria are generally
under researched and academia is so far catching up on much of the happenings in the region.
Thus this study is so far one of a kind and contribute with valuable insight on how Western
news media actors understand the actions of these women. As it is a qualitative study with
limited resources, much more can and should be done on the topic, especially if we are to
interact or intervene in any way in the Syrian conflict without doing more harm than good.
News media play a key role in reflecting and reproducing cultural practices, and if potentially
harmful constructions are not addressed, discursive practices will maintain an asymmetrical
power relation complicating collaboration between actors.
50
References
News Media Primary Material
DN, 2013-05-12. “Här tränar de för strid vid fronten” [online news reportage]. Meltio, N. for
Dagens Nyheter. Available at: http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/har-tranar-de-for-strid-vid-
fronten/ [Accessed: 15 April 2016].
DN, 2015-02-05. “Kvinnor i IS: 9-åringar kan giftas bort” [online news report]. Hall, T. for
Dagens Nyheter. Available at: http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/kvinnor-i-is-9-aringar-kan-
giftas-bort-1/ [Accessed: 15 April 2016].
GNM, 2014-09-06. “The British women married to jihad” [online news reportage]. Khaleeli,
H. for The Guardian. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/06/british-
women-married-to-jihad-isis-syria [Accessed: 15 April 2016].
GNM, 2015-09-11. “The women taking on Isis: on the ground with Iraq’s female fighters”
[online news reportage]. Moroz, S. for The Guardian. Available at:
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2015/sep/11/women-taking-on-isis-iraq-yazidi-
female-fighters [Accessed: 15 April 2016].
IND, 2015-07-28, “Glasgow Isis bride Aqsa Mahmood ‘writes poem praising Tunisia, France
and Kuwait attacks as Black Friday’” [online news report]. Withnall, A. for The Independent.
Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/glasgow-isis-bride-aqsa-
mahmood-writes-poem-praising-tunisia-france-and-kuwait-attacks-as-black-10351113.html
[Accessed: 15 April 2016].
IND, 2015-12-09. “’Isis are afraid of girls’: Kurdish female fighters believe they have an
unexpected advantage fighting in Syria” [online news reportage]. Dearden, L. for The
Independent. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-are-
afraid-of-girls-kurdish-female-fighters-believe-they-have-an-unexpected-advantage-fighting-
a6766776.html [Accessed: 15 April 2016].
NYT, 2014-10-13. “Women Fight ISIS and Sexism in Kurdish Regions” [online opinion
piece]. Flanagin, J. for The New York Times. Available at: http://op-
talk.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/13/women-fight-isis-and-sexism-in-kurdish-regions/?_r=0
[Accessed: 16 April 2016].
51
NYT, 2015-01-21. “When Women Become Terrorists” [online op-ed]. Huckerby, J. for The
New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/22/opinion/when-women-
become-terrorists.html?_r=0 [Accessed: 16 April 2016].
SvD, 2014-09-28. “Unga svenskor ansluter sig till IS” [online news reportage]. Örvall Lovén,
A. for Svenska Dagbladet. Available at: http://www.svd.se/unga-svenskor-ansluter-sig-till-is
[Accessed: 15 April 2016].
SvD, 2015-05-24. “Kvinnorna som besegrade IS” [online news reportage]. Can, M. for
Svenska Dagbladet. Available at: http://www.svd.se/kvinnornas-krig-tar-aldrig-slut-
7v4M/om/slaget-om-kobane [Accessed 15 April 2016].
WP, 2015-11-17. “Why young American women are joining ISIS” [online opinion piece].
Paquette, D. for The Washington Post. Available at:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/11/17/why-young-american-women-
are-joining-isis/ [Accessed: 16 April 2016]
WP, 2015-12-23. “What are the Kurdish Women’s Units fighting for in Syria?” [online
opinion piece]. Austin Holmes, A. for The Washington Post. Available at:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2015/12/23/what-are-the-kurdish-
womens-units-fighting-for-in-syria/ [Accessed: 16 April 2016].
Online Sources
Al-Khanssaa Brigade (2015). Women of the Islamic State – A manifesto on women by the Al-
Khanssaa Brigade [online]. Translated from Arabic and analyzed by Winter, C.. Quilliam
Foundation. Available at: http://www.quilliamfoundation.org/wp/wp-
content/uploads/publications/free/women-of-the-islamic-state3.pdf.
BBC Our World (2015). Rojava: Syria’s Secret Revolution [online]. Available at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKhjJfH0ra4 [Accessed 8 April 2016].
Human Rights Watch (2015). “Syria: Kurdish Forces Violating Child Soldier Ban - Despite
Promises, Children Still Fight” [online]. Published 15 July 2015. Available at:
https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/07/10/syria-kurdish-forces-violating-child-soldier-ban-0
[Accessed: 2016-05-08].
Ohlsson, E. (2015). ”Syriska kvinnor medlar mellan rebeller och regeringssoldater” [online].
Stockholm: Dagens Nyheter. Published: 10 October 2015. Available at:
52
http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/oroligheterna-i-syrien-tangerar-ett-varldskrig/ [Accessed 9
April 2016].
Tavakolian, N. (2015). “Fight for Their Rights” [online]. In: Time. Published 20 April, 2015.
Available at: EBSCOhost,
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.proxy.mah.se/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=c651bef1-f39e-
4edb-9c63-8d0037d313b5%40sessionmgr107&vid=1&hid=115.
UCDP – Uppsala Conflict Data Program (2015). “Syria” [online]. Available at:
http://ucdp.uu.se/#country/652 [Accessed at: 2016-04-04].
Cloud, D. L. (2004). “’To veil the threat of terror’: Afghan women and the ⟨clash of
civilizations⟨ in the imagery of the U.S. war on terrorism”. In: Quarterly Journal of Speech.
Vol. 90(3): 285-306.
Connell, R.W. & Messerschmidt, J.W. (2005). “Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the
Concept”. In: Gender and Society, Vol 19 (6): 829-859.
Fairclough, N. (2008). “The language of critical discourse analysis: reply to Michael Billig”.
In: Discourse & Society. Vol 19(6): 811-819.
Faucet, C. (2015). “Syria – Victory for autonomy”. In: New Internationalist. Published April
2015: 10.
Galtung, J. (1969). “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research”. In: Journal of Peace Research.
Vol. 6(3): 167-191.
Griffin, M. (2010). “Media images of war”. In: Media, War & Conflict. Vol. 3(1): 7-41.
Gupta, R. (2016). “Military fatigues and floral scarves”. In: New Internationalist. Published
May 2016: 42-43.
Mohanty, C. (1988). “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.”
In: Feminist Review. Vol 30: 61-88.
53
Navest, A., de Kooning, M. & Moors, A. (2016). ”Chatting about marriage with female
migrants to Syria”. In: Anthropology Today. Vol. 32(2): 22-25.
Pearson, E. (2015). “The Case of Roshonara Choudhry: Implications for Theory on Online
Radicalization, ISIS Women, and the Gendered Jihad”. In: Policy & Internet. Vol 8(1): 5-33.
Peresin, A. & Cervone, A. (2015). “The Western Muhajirat of ISIS”. In: Studies in Conflict &
Terrorism. Vol 38(7): 495-509.
Saed (2015) “Rojava”. In: Capitalism Nature Socialism. Vol. 26(1): 1-15.
Simic, O. (2010). “Does the Presence of Women Really Matter? Towards Combating Male
Sexual Violence in Peacekeeping Operations”. In: International Peacekeeping, Vol 17 (2):
188-199.
Steans, J. (2008). “Telling Stories about Women and Gender in the War on Terror”. In:
Global Society. Vol. 22(1): 159-176.
Thobani, S. (2007). “White Wars: Western feminisms and the ‘War on Terror’”. In: Feminist
Theory. Vol 8(2): 169-185.
Chambliss, D. F. & Schutt, R. K. (2016). Making Sense of the Social World – Methods of
Investigation. 5th ed. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore: SAGE Publications Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among five
approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Inc.
Eliatamby, M. (2011). “Searching for Emancipation: Eritrea, Nepal, and Sri Lanka”. In:
Cheldelin, S. I. Eliatamby, M. eds. (2011). Women Waging War and Peace: International
Perspectives on Women’s Roles in Conflict and Post-Conflict Reconstruction. New York,
London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
54
Eliatamby, M. & Romanova, E. (2011). “Dying for Identity: Chechnya and Sri Lanka”. In:
Cheldelin, S. I. Eliatamby, M. eds. (2011). Women Waging War and Peace: International
Perspectives on Women’s Roles in Conflict and Post-Conflict Reconstruction. New York,
London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Eriksson, C., Eriksson Baaz, M. & Thörn, H. (1999). ”Inledning av Catharina Eriksson, Maria
Eriksson Baaz och Håkan Thörn”. In: Eriksson, C., Eriksson Baaz, M. & Thörn, H. eds.
(1999). Globaliseringens kulturer – Den postkoloniala paradoxen, rasismen och det
mångkulturella samhället. Nora: Bokförlaget Nya Doxa.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Hodder Education part of Hachette Livre
UK.
Gee, J. P. (2011). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis – Theory and Method. 3rd ed. New
York, London: Routledge.
Gentry, C. E. & Sjoberg, L. (2011). “The Gendering of Women’s Terrorism”. In: Sjoberg, L.
& Gentry, C. E., eds. (2011). Women, Gender, and Terrorism. Athens: University of Georgia
Press.
Hoskins, A. & O’Loughlin, B. (2010). War and Media – The Emergence of Diffused War.
Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.
Kaldor, M. (2012). New and Old Wars. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Minh-ha, T. T. (1989) “Olikhet: sär-skilt för kvinnor i tredje världen” (Original title:
”Difference: ’A Special Third World Women Issue’”). Translated to Swedish by Månsson, P.
L.. In: Eriksson, C., Eriksson Baaz, M. & Thörn, H. eds. (1999). Globaliseringens kulturer –
Den postkoloniala paradoxen, rasismen och det mångkulturella samhället. Nora: Bokförlaget
Nya Doxa.
Moser, C.O.N. (2001). “The Gendered Continuum of Violence and Conflict: An Operational
Framework”. In: Moser, C.O.N. & Clark, F.C., eds. (2001). Victims, Perpetrators or Actors?
Gender, Armed Conflict and Political Violence. New York: Zed Books.
55
Moser, C.O.N. & Clark, F.C. (2001). “Introduction”. In: Moser, C.O.N. & Clark, F.C., ed.
(2001). Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? Gender, Armed Conflict and Political Violence. New
York: Zed Books.
Nealon, J. & Searls Giroux, S. (2012). The Theory Toolbox - Critical concepts for the
Humanities, Arts, & Social Sciences. 2nd Ed. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Nilsson, G. & Lövkrona, I. (2015). Våldets kön – Kulturella föreställningar, funktioner och
konsekvenser. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Qazi, F. (2011). “The Mujahidaat: Tracing the Early Female Warriors of Islam”. In: Sjoberg,
L. & Gentry, C. E., eds. (2011). Women, Gender, and Terrorism. Athens: University of
Georgia Press.
Salla, M. (2001). ”Women & War, Men & Pacifism”. In: Skjelsbæk, I. & Smith, D. eds.
(2001). Gender, Peace and Conflict. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE
Publications Ltd.
Sjoberg, L., Cooke, G. D. & Neal, S. R. (2011). “Introduction: Women, Gender, and
Terrorism”. In: Sjoberg, L. & Gentry, C. E., eds. (2011). Women, Gender, and Terrorism.
Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Sjoberg, L. & Via, S. (2010). “Introduction”. In: Sjoberg, L. & Via, S., eds. (2010). Gender,
War and Militarism: Feminist Perspectives. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
Spivak, G. C. (1999). “Can the Subaltern Speak?”. In: V. B Leitch et al, ed. (2001). The
Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
56
Sundberg, R. & Harbom, L. (2011). “Systematic Data Collection: Experiences from the
Uppsala Conflict Data Program”. In: Höglund, K. & Öberg, M. (2011). Understanding Peace
Research – Methods and Challenges. London, New York: Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News Analysis – Case Studies of International and National News in
the Press. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Via, S. (2010). “Gender, Militarism and Globalization: Soldiers for Hire and Hegemonic
Masculinity”. In: Sjoberg, L. & Via, S., eds. (2010). Gender, War and Militarism: Feminist
Perspectives. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
Winther Jørgensen, M. & Phillips, L. (2000). Diskursanalys som teori och metod (Original
title: Diskursanalyse som teori og metode). Translated to Swedish by Thorhell, S. Lund:
Studentlitteratur.
Zarkov, D., (2001). “The Body of the Other Man: Sexual Violence and the Construction of
Masculinity, Sexuality and Ethnicity in the Croatian Media”. In: Moser, C.O.N., Clark, F.C.,
ed. (2001). Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? Gender, Armed Conflict and Political Violence.
New York: Zed Books.
57
Appendix I. Analysis
In order to scrutinize the material more in detail, I have constructed specific questions based
on questions outlined by Fairclough (1995: 202ff.), but also based on suggestions from
Winther Jørgensen & Phillips (2000: 66-92). The questions for the visual material are
influenced by the same and additionally from Gillian Rose’s Visual Methodologies: An
Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials (2001). Lastly, I put the elements and
actors in a scale of positioning ranging from whether it is completely absent to foregrounded
in the text (Fairclough, 1995: 106ff.).
Text Analysis:
Visual analysis:
58
How is lightning, framing, perspective, camera-angles and movement applied to
generate meaning?
What meaning is generated in the combination of text and image(s), which neither
could generate on its own?
What relationships are set up between text and image?
59
Appendix II. Material
The news material consists of, as mentioned, varied types of texts with slightly varying
conventions.
The YPJ are Kurdish female fighters among others, and some names are used interchangeably
in the understanding of different Kurdish militias, sometimes making it difficult to understand
the complexity of the Kurdish and other guerrilla movements engaging in Syria.
Consequently, sometimes the pesh merga, the Iraqi Kurdish milita, was equalized to the YPJ,
thus I tried this as search word in the selection process where the results were scarce or non-
existent. Search words used when selecting the material on the YPJ and the search results on
each broadsheet respectively is represented below, in order to provide a glimpse of the
scarcity and potential confusion of names. Note that “Female fighters Syria” gets the most hits
because usually it includes the female jihadists as part of the search results.
With the Swedish and British news media, I have managed to select the most read liberal and
conservative broadsheet, however, the conservative option for North American media was
Wall Street Journal, but they lacked material on the YPJ entirely. Thus I chose the
Washington Post instead, because there was little emphasis and interest in relation to the
explicit positions of the media houses, as the selected opinion pieces does not necessarily
have to express this standpoint. What was most important in the selection was actually in
relation to their readers, otherwise claiming that they are influential in their respective country
would be incorrect.
10
For the Swedish news agencies I used ”kvinnliga soldater Syrien”.
11
For the Swedish news agencies I used ”kvinnliga kurdiska soldater”.
12
This was not used at all for the Swedish news agencies.
60