Scribd
Upload
35 views16 pages

Trade Off Template

This document analyzes and ranks three alternative designs (Design 1, Design 2, Design 3) based on five criteria (Maintainability, Usability, Safety, Functionality, Quality). It uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine weights for each criterion. Based on the weighted performance scores of each design against the criteria, Design 3 has the highest overall score at 37.25%, followed by Design 2 at 32.14%, and Design 1 at 30.61%. Therefore, Design 3 is the recommended best design option.

Uploaded by

marcjamesbalidoy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
35 views16 pages

Trade Off Template

This document analyzes and ranks three alternative designs (Design 1, Design 2, Design 3) based on five criteria (Maintainability, Usability, Safety, Functionality, Quality). It uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine weights for each criterion. Based on the weighted performance scores of each design against the criteria, Design 3 has the highest overall score at 37.25%, followed by Design 2 at 32.14%, and Design 1 at 30.61%. Therefore, Design 3 is the recommended best design option.

Uploaded by

marcjamesbalidoy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

AVE

ALTERNATIVE
DESIGN CRITERIA IMPORTANCE EXISTING DESIGN DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3
1. Maintainability 2.2449 3.8125 4.0612 4.1633 4.7143
2. Usability 3.5918 3.8542 3.7551 3.9388 4.5306
3. Safety 3.5510 3.8750 3.6327 3.7755 4.3878
4. Functionality 3.6327 4.1458 3.8163 4.1020 4.7347
5. Quality 2.9592 3.9792 3.7551 3.8367 4.5918

AHP
1. Maintainability 5 2
2. Usability 2 8
3. Safety 3 6
4. Functionality 1 10
5. Quality 4 4
RANKING CRITERIA
Maintainability Usability Safety Functionality Quality
Maintainability 1 1/4 1/3 1/5 1/2
Usability 4 1 1 1/3 4/5 2
Safety 3 3/4 1 3/5 1 1/2
Functionality 5 1 1/4 1 2/3 1 2 1/2
Quality 2 1/2 2/3 2/5 1
SUM 15 3 3/4 5 3 7 1/2

Other way of getting Priority vector OTHER WAY OF GETTING PRIORITY MATRIX
0.38385 0.06667 STEP 1: MULTIPLY THE ROWS OF CRITERIA ON THE RAN
1.53541 0.26667 STEP 2: POWER UP THE PRODUCT WITH 1/M, M=NUM
1.15156 0.20000 STEP 3: SUM THE RESULT ON EACH CRITERIA
STEP 4: GET WEIGHTS BY DIVIDING THE RESULT/SUM O
1.91926 0.33333
0.76770 0.13333
5.75778
5
2
3
1
4

NORMALIZED
MaintainabilityUsability Safety FunctionalQuality PRIORITY VECTOR
Maintainabi 0.0667 0.0667 0.0667 0.0667 0.0667 0.0667
Usability 0.2667 0.2667 0.2667 0.2667 0.2667 0.2667
Safety 0.2000 0.2000 0.2000 0.2000 0.2000 0.2000
Functionali 0.3333 0.3333 0.3333 0.3333 0.3333 0.3333
Quality 0.1333 0.1333 0.1333 0.1333 0.1333 0.1333
SUM 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

PRIORITY MATRIX
OWS OF CRITERIA ON THE RANKING TABLE
PRODUCT WITH 1/M, M=NUMBER OF CRITERIA
ON EACH CRITERIA
DIVIDING THE RESULT/SUM OF RESULT
CHECKING FOR CONSISTENCY
0.333333 5.00
1.333333 5.00
1 5.00
1.666667 5.00
0.666667 5.00
5.00 0 0
Maintainability
DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3 DESIGN CRITERIA IMPORTANCE
DESIGN 1 1.0000 0.9755 0.8615 1. Maintainability 2.2449
DESIGN 2 1.0251 1.0000 0.8831 2. Usability 3.5918
DESIGN 3 1.1608 1.1324 1.0000 3. Safety 3.5510
3.1859 3.1078 2.7446 4. Functionality 3.6327
5. Quality 2.9592
NORMALIZED
DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3 PRIORITY VECTOR
DESIGN 1 0.3139 0.3139 0.3139 0.3139
DESIGN 2 0.3218 0.3218 0.3218 0.3218
DESIGN 3 0.3644 0.3644 0.3644 0.3644

Usability NORMALIZED
DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3
DESIGN 1 1.0000 0.9534 0.8288 0.3072 0.3072 0.3072
DESIGN 2 1.0489 1.0000 0.8694 0.3222 0.3222 0.3222
DESIGN 3 1.2065 1.1503 1.0000 0.3706 0.3706 0.3706
3.2554 3.1036 2.6982

Safety NORMALIZED
DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3 0.3080 0.3080 0.3080
DESIGN 1 1.0000 0.9622 0.8279 0.3201 0.3201 0.3201
DESIGN 2 1.0393 1.0000 0.8605 0.3720 0.3720 0.3720
DESIGN 3 1.2079 1.1622 1.0000
3.2472 3.1243 2.6884

Functionality NORMALIZED
DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3 0.3016 0.3016 0.3016
DESIGN 1 1.0000 0.9303 0.8060 0.3242 0.3242 0.3242
DESIGN 2 1.0749 1.0000 0.8664 0.3742 0.3742 0.3742
DESIGN 3 1.2406 1.1542 1.0000
3.3155 3.0846 2.6724

Quality NORMALIZED
DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3 0.3082 0.3082 0.3082
DESIGN 1 1.0000 0.9787 0.8178 0.3149 0.3149 0.3149
DESIGN 2 1.0217 1.0000 0.8356 0.3769 0.3769 0.3769
DESIGN 3 1.2228 1.1968 1.0000
3.2446 3.1755 2.6533

MaintainabiUsability Safety FunctionaliQuality


Weights 0.0667 0.2667 0.2000 0.3333 0.1333
Design 1 0.3139 0.3072 0.3080 0.3016 0.3082 30.61%
Design 2 0.3218 0.3222 0.3201 0.3242 0.3149 32.14%
Design 3 0.3644 0.3706 0.3720 0.3742 0.3769 37.25%
ALTERNATIVE
EXISTING DESIGN DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3
3.8125 4.0612 4.1633 4.7143
3.8542 3.7551 3.9388 4.5306
3.8750 3.6327 3.7755 4.3878
4.1458 3.8163 4.1020 4.7347
3.9792 3.7551 3.8367 4.5918

PRIORITY VECTOR
0.3072
0.3222
0.3706

PRIORITY VECTOR
0.3080
0.3201
0.3720

PRIORITY VECTOR
0.3016
0.3242
0.3742

PRIORITY VECTOR
0.3082
0.3149
0.3769
ALTERNATIVE
DESIGN CRITERIA DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3 BEST WORST
1. Maintainability 4.0612 4.1633 4.7143 4.7143 4.0612
2. Usability 3.7551 3.9388 4.5306 4.5306 3.7551
3. Safety 3.6327 3.7755 4.3878 4.3878 3.6327
4. Functionality 3.8163 4.1020 4.7347 4.7347 3.8163
5. Quality 3.7551 3.8367 4.5918 4.5918 3.7551

STD DEV
1. Maintainability - 0.1562 1.0000 0.5379
2. Usability - 0.2368 1.0000 0.5226
3. Safety - 0.1892 1.0000 0.5312
4. Functionality - 0.3111 1.0000 0.5118
5. Quality - 0.0976 1.0000 0.5513

SYMMETRIC
Maintainability Usability Safety Functionality Quality
Maintainability 1.0000 0.9966 0.9994 0.9867 0.9984
Usability 0.9966 1.0000 0.9988 0.9968 0.9902
Safety 0.9994 0.9988 1.0000 0.9916 0.9959
Functionality 0.9867 0.9968 0.9916 1.0000 0.9758
Quality 0.9984 0.9902 0.9959 0.9758 1.0000

Maintainability Usability Safety Functionality Quality SUM


Maintainability - 0.0034 0.0006 0.0133 0.0016 0.0189
Usability 0.0034 - 0.0012 0.0032 0.0098 0.0177
Safety 0.0006 0.0012 - 0.0084 0.0041 0.0143
Functionality 0.0133 0.0032 0.0084 - 0.0242 0.0491
Quality 0.0016 0.0098 0.0041 0.0242 - 0.0397
SUM*STD DEV WEIGHTS
0.0102 0.1374
0.0092 0.1248
0.0076 0.1026
0.0251 0.3395
0.0219 0.2957
0.0740
ALTERNATIVE
DESIGN CRITERIA DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3 SUMMATION
1. Maintainability 4.0612 4.1633 4.7143 12.9388
2. Usability 3.7551 3.9388 4.5306 12.2245
3. Safety 3.6327 3.7755 4.3878 11.7959
4. Functionality 3.8163 4.1020 4.7347 12.6531
5. Quality 3.7551 3.8367 4.5918 12.1837

DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3


Maintainability 0.3139 0.3218 0.3644
Usability 0.3072 0.3222 0.3706
Safety 0.3080 0.3201 0.3720
Functionality 0.3016 0.3242 0.3742
Quality 0.3082 0.3149 0.3769

SUM ENTROPY
Maintainability - 0.3637 - 0.3649 - 0.3679 - 1.0964 0.6813 0.3187 0.199514
Usability - 0.3626 - 0.3649 - 0.3679 - 1.0954 0.6806 0.3194 0.19993
Safety - 0.3627 - 0.3646 - 0.3679 - 1.0952 0.6805 0.3195 0.199993
Functionality - 0.3615 - 0.3652 - 0.3678 - 1.0945 0.6801 0.3199 0.200257
Quality - 0.3628 - 0.3639 - 0.3678 - 1.0944 0.6800 0.3200 0.200306
1.5976
ALTERNATIVE
DESIGN CRITERIA WEIGHTS DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3 MAX VALUE
1. Maintainability 0.0663 4.0612 4.1633 4.7143 4.7143
2. Usability 0.2509 3.7551 3.9388 4.5306 4.5306
3. Safety 0.1989 3.6327 3.7755 4.3878 4.3878
4. Functionality 0.3514 3.8163 4.1020 4.7347 4.7347
5. Quality 0.1326 3.7551 3.8367 4.5918 4.5918

WSM
ALTERNATIVE
DESIGN CRITERIA WEIGHTS DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3
1. Maintainability 0.0663 0.0571 0.0585 0.0663
2. Usability 0.2509 0.2079 0.2181 0.2509
3. Safety 0.1989 0.1646 0.1711 0.1989
4. Functionality 0.3514 0.2833 0.3045 0.3514
5. Quality 0.1326 0.1084 0.1108 0.1326
0.8213 0.8630 1.0000

WPM
ALTERNATIVE
DESIGN CRITERIA WEIGHTS DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3
1. Maintainability 0.0663 0.9902 0.9918 1.0000
2. Usability 0.2509 0.9540 0.9655 1.0000
3. Safety 0.1989 0.9631 0.9706 1.0000
4. Functionality 0.3514 0.9270 0.9508 1.0000
5. Quality 0.1326 0.9737 0.9765 1.0000
4.8080 4.8552 5.0000

WASPAS
ALTERNATIVE
DESIGN CRITERIA WEIGHTS DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3
1. Maintainability 0.0663 0.5236 0.5252 0.5331
2. Usability 0.2509 0.5810 0.5918 0.6254
3. Safety 0.1989 0.5639 0.5708 0.5994
4. Functionality 0.3514 0.6051 0.6277 0.6757
5. Quality 0.1326 0.5410 0.5436 0.5663
2.8147 2.8591 3.0000
NORMALIZED ALTERNATIVE
DESIGN CRITERIA WEIGHTS DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3
1. Maintainability 0.0663 0.8615 0.8831 1.0000
2. Usability 0.2509 0.8288 0.8694 1.0000
3. Safety 0.1989 0.8279 0.8605 1.0000
4. Functionality 0.3514 0.8060 0.8664 1.0000
5. Quality 0.1326 0.8178 0.8356 1.0000
Maximin (Best of Worst)

ALTERNATIVE
DESIGN CRITERIA IMPORTANCE EXISTING DESIGN DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2
1. Maintainability 2.2449 3.8125 4.0612 4.1633
2. Usability 3.5918 3.8542 3.7551 3.9388
3. Safety 3.5510 3.8750 3.6327 3.7755
4. Functionality 3.6327 4.1458 3.8163 4.1020
5. Quality 2.9592 3.9792 3.7551 3.8367

MINIMUM 3.8125 3.6327 3.7755

IMPRECISE

IMPRECISE DESIGNER RANKING TABLE

ALTERNATIVE
DESIGN CRITERIA IMPORTANCE DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2
1. Maintainability 2.2449 0.1405 1.8091 1.8545
2. Usability 3.5918 0.2248 1.0455 1.0966
3. Safety 3.5510 0.2222 1.0230 1.0632
4. Functionality 3.6327 0.2273 1.0506 1.1292
5. Quality 2.9592 0.1852 1.2690 1.2966

TOTAL 15.9796 1.2394 1.2880


NATIVE
DESIGN 3
4.7143
4.5306
4.3878
4.7347
4.5918

4.3878

DESIGN 3
2.1000
1.2614
1.2356
1.3034
1.5517

1.4904
ALTERNATIVE
DESIGN CRITERIA IMPORTANCE DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3
1. Maintainability 0.0667 4.0612 4.1633 4.7143
2. Usability 0.2667 3.7551 3.9388 4.5306
3. Safety 0.2000 3.6327 3.7755 4.3878
4. Functionality 0.3333 3.8163 4.1020 4.7347
5. Quality 0.1333 3.7551 3.8367 4.5918

NORMALIZED MATRIX DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3


1. Maintainability 0.54 0.56 0.63
2. Usability 0.53 0.56 0.64
3. Safety 0.53 0.55 0.64
4. Functionality 0.52 0.56 0.65
5. Quality 0.53 0.54 0.65

WEIGHTED NORMALIZED DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3


1. Maintainability 0.04 0.04 0.04 For Benefit Criterio
2. Usability 0.14 0.15 0.17
3. Safety 0.11 0.11 0.13
v+j = maximum val
4. Functionality 0.17 0.19 0.22 v-j = minimum valu
5. Quality 0.07 0.07 0.09
For Non-Beneficial
vj+ vj-
1. Maintainability 0.04 0.04 v+j = minimum valu
2. Usability 0.17 0.14 v-j = maximum valu
3. Safety 0.13 0.11
4. Functionality 0.22 0.17
5. Quality 0.09 0.07

ALTERNATIVE Si+ Si- Pi RANK


D1 0.058017828301 0 0.000000 3
D2 0.043260635117 0.01539772 0.262498 2
D3 0 0.05801783 1.000000 1
For Benefit Criterion:
v+j = maximum value
v-j = minimum value

For Non-Beneficial Criterion:


v+j = minimum value
v-j = maximum value
ALTERNATIVE
DESIGN CRITERIA IMPORTANCE DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3
1. Maintainability 0.0667 4.0612 4.1633 4.7143
2. Usability 0.2667 3.7551 3.9388 4.5306
3. Safety 0.2000 3.6327 3.7755 4.3878
4. Functionality 0.3333 3.8163 4.1020 4.7347
5. Quality 0.1333 3.7551 3.8367 4.5918

ALTERNATIVE
DESIGN CRITERIA IMPORTANCE DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3
1. Maintainability 0.0667 - 0.1562 1.0000
2. Usability 0.2667 - 0.2368 1.0000
3. Safety 0.2000 - 0.1892 1.0000
4. Functionality 0.3333 - 0.3111 1.0000
5. Quality 0.1333 - 0.0976 1.0000

1. Maintainability 2. Usability 3. Safety 4. Functionality


D1-D2 - 0.1562 - 0.2368 - 0.1892 - 0.3111
D1-D3 - 1.0000 - 1.0000 - 1.0000 - 1.0000
D2-D1 0.1562 0.2368 0.1892 0.3111
D2-D3 - 0.8438 - 0.7632 - 0.8108 - 0.6889
D3-D1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
D3-D2 0.8438 0.7632 0.8108 0.6889

1. Maintainability 2. Usability 3. Safety 4. Functionality


D1-D2 - - - -
D1-D3 - - - -
D2-D1 0.0104 0.0632 0.0378 0.1037
D2-D3 - - - -
D3-D1 0.0667 0.2667 0.2000 0.3333
D3-D2 0.0562 0.2035 0.1622 0.2296

PROMETHEE II
D1 D2 D3 Leaving Flow
D1 - - - -
D2 0.2281 - - 0.1141
D3 1.0000 0.7719 - 0.8859
Entering Flow 0.6141 0.3859 -

Entering Flow Leaving Flow (LF-EF) RANK


D1 0.6141 - - 0.6141 3
D2 0.3859 0.1141 - 0.2719 2
D3 - 0.8859 0.8859 1
MAX MIN MAX-MIN
For Benefit Criterion:
4.7143 4.0612 0.6531 = (𝑥−𝑚𝑖𝑛)/max⁡〖− 𝑚𝑖𝑛〗
4.5306 3.7551 0.7755
4.3878 3.6327 0.7551
For Non-Beneficial Criterion:
4.7347 3.8163 0.9184
4.5918 3.7551 0.8367 = max⁡〖−𝑥〗 /max⁡〖− 𝑚𝑖𝑛〗

5. Quality 0.0667 0.2667 0.2000 0.3333 0.1333


- 0.0976 D1-D2 - - - - -
- 1.0000 D1-D3 - - - - -
0.0976 D2-D1 0.1562 0.2368 0.1892 0.3111 0.0976
- 0.9024 D2-D3 - - - - -
1.0000 D3-D1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
0.9024 D3-D2 0.8438 0.7632 0.8108 0.6889 0.9024

5. Quality SUM
- -
- -
0.0130 0.2281
- -
0.1333 1.0000
0.1203 0.7719

You might also like