Chapter 9 The School Head in School Based Management
Chapter 9 The School Head in School Based Management
SBM provides principals, teachers, students, and parents greater control over the
education process by giving them responsibility for decisions about the budget,
personnel, and the curriculum.
Through the involvement of teachers, parents, and other community members in these
key decisions, SBM can create more effective learning environment for children.
SBM is in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity which states that it is the people at
the lowest level who will know best their problems and so are in the best position to
address the same.
This tenet holds that “nothing should be done by a larger and more complex organization
which can be done as well by a smaller and simpler organization.”
“In other words, any activity which can be performed by a more decentralized entity
should be done by that more decentralized entity.”
Those in the higher echelon are far removed from the scene and are therefore not as
involved and as informed as those from those below.
Advantages of SBM
Allow competent individuals in the schools to make decision that will improve
learning;
Give the entire school community a voice in key decisions;
Focus accountability for decisions;
Lead to greater creativity in the design of programs;
Redirect resources to support the goals developed in each school;
Lead to realistic budgeting as parents and teachers become more aware of the
school’s financial status, spending limitations, and the cost of its programs; and
Improve morale of teachers and nurture new leadership at all levels
Through SBM, decision making authority is devolved to school heads, parents and students.
This is school empowerment. This reduce bureaucratic controls on schools and encourage
school heads, teachers and parents to use greater initiative in meeting the needs of students
and community. This result in a sense of community school ownership which makes the
school realize its vision and mission.
Through SBM, problems and needs at the school level get solved faster and specific
personalities and cultures are taken into consideration. These personalities and cultures are
usually ignored in multi-layered in hierarchical organization like DepEd. In hierarchical
organization, straight jacket rules, procedures and allocation norms are given and apply to all.
It takes time to solve problems if schools have to wait for answers from above. As a result,
teachers, parents and students are frustrated due to delays.
In SBM, schools take responsibility to plan and implement their School Improvement Plans
(SIP). It is the schools themselves, not DepEd higher offices that know best their problems
and the solutions to these problems. It is the schools that determine the number and kind of
teachers they need, the kind of learning materials and resources they need.
Since school are given more power to direct themselves, they are made accountable for
results. SBM makes schools accountable to stakeholders.
The Philippine Constitution provides that Congress shall enact a local government code that
will institutionalize a system of decentralization (Article 10, Sec. 3) whereby local
government units shall be extended more power, authority....The Local Government Code
in 1991 is a fulfillment of this Constitutional provision.
This means that long before the Department of Education (DepEd) legally introduced
decentralization in schools through School-Based Management (SBM) in 2001 through the
enactment of RA 9155, local government units were already empowered for local
governance. RA 9155, Basic Governance Act transfers the power and authority as well as the
resources to the school level.
1. Teachers, school head must be given the opportunity to make choices. They must actively
participate in school improvement planning.
2. The involvement of parents and teachers must be strongly encouraged and highly welcomed.
3. Stakeholders must participate in the development of a School Improvement Plan. They must
have a say on resource allocation to meet specific needs.
4. Higher authorities must actively encourage thoughtful experimentation and innovation in an
atmosphere where mistakes are viewed as learning experiences. They must be willing to
share their authority with the academic and the larger community.
5. Teachers must develop reflection, problem solving.
In addition, based on international experience, the following must be present for SBM to
succeed in schools:
The success of SBM very much depends on the school head. Here are his/her functions:
Functions Knowledge/Skills,
Roles
Attitude Required
Visionary principal, motivator, Lead in setting the vision, Change and future orientation
advocate and planner mission and goals of the school
Effective practices need to be institutionalized for them to become part of the school culture.
To build professional capacity and establish mechanism that supports the continuing quality
improvement of schools is an assurance that effective schools even become more effective.
School-Based Management (SBM) is the mechanism introduced by the Department of
Education in the Philippines to continuously work on effective schools. As the term implies,
in SBM, schools are given greater autonomy to make decisions regarding education of
children.
The research finding of OECD confirms "that school autonomy has a positive relationship
with student performance when account ability measures are in place and/or when school
principals and teachers, collaborate in school management" (OECD, 2012). China and
Singapore have been "devolving more responsibility to the school level" (Stewart, 2008). In
Finland, accountability rests on the trust placed by families and government in the
professional competence of teachers (Stewart, 2008).
In the Philippines, the devolving of more responsibility to the schools was done through the
School-Based Management (SBM). SBM was introduced during the implementation of the
Third Elementary Education Project (TEEP), 1999-2005. In 2005, TEEP conducted a study
to determine the effect of school-based management on student performance in the -
Philippines using the administrative dataset of all public schools in 23 school districts over a
3-year period, 2003-2005.
The results showed that the introduction of SBM had a statistically significant, although
small, overall positive effect on average school-level test scores in 23 school districts in the
Philippines.
With SBM, significant decision-making authority was transferred from state and district
offices to individual schools. SBM provided principals, teachers, students, and parents
greater control over the, education process by giving them for decisions about the budget,
personnel, and the curriculum.
Through the involvement of teachers, parents, and other community members in these key
decisions, SBM can create more effective learning environments for children.
To further strengthen the School-Based Management (SBM) practice and re-emphasize the
centrality of the learners and the involvement of relevant community in basic education
service delivery, the Department of Education (DepEd) embarked on revisiting the SBM
framework, assessment process and tool to improve on already recognized successful SBM
practices across the regions (DO 83, s. 2012).
Philippine Accreditation System for Basic Education (PASBE)
• The institutionalization of SBM was strengthened with the introduction of the Philippine
Accreditation System for Basic Education (PASBE) which was launched through DepED
Order No. 64, s. 2012.
• To institutionalize decentralization' efforts at the school level and in line with Republic
Act No. 9155 also known as Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001, the Department
of Education (DepEd) provided School-Based Management (SBM) Grants as additional
funds to public elementary and secondary schools,.. to augment the school fund on
Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (DO 45, s. 2015).
• The institutionalization of SBM was strengthened with the introduction of the Philippine
Accreditation System for Basic Education (PASBE) which was launched through DepED
Order No. 64, s. 2012.
• Accreditation is a process of self-evaluation and peer review to ensure that quality
standards agreed upon by stakeholders are understood, implemented, maintained, and
enhanced for continuous improvement of learner outcomes (DepEd DO 20, s. 2013 -The
Philippine Accreditation System for Basic Education (PASBE) Supplemental Guidelines
to DepEd Order No. 83, S. 2012).
The agreed upon standards of quality or effective schools are grounded on the four principles
of A Child-and -Community -Centered Education Systems (ACCESs), namely:
Level I- Developing
Level II - Maturing
Level III – Advanced
A school that reaches the highest level of SBM practice qualifies for an accredited status.
A school in Level I, developing, means that the school is developing structures and
mechanisms with acceptable level and extent of community participation and impact
on learning.
A school in Level lI, described as Maturing, means that the school is introducing and
sustaining continuous improvement process that integrates wider community
participation and significantly improve performance and learning outcomes.
Level III, Advanced (Accredited) means that the school is ensuring the production
of intended outputs/outcomes and meeting all standards of a system fully integrated in
the local community and is self-renewing and self-sustaining.
Research findings point to the following factors that spell school effectiveness:
1. Human factors – These include a dynamic school head, highly selected competent and
committed teachers, highly motivated pupils with high expectations, and a supportive
community.
2. Non- human factors, processes – These refer to clear and shared vision-mission (focus),
high expectations/ ambitious standards, emphasis on accountability, aligned curriculum,
instruction and assessment with state / DepEd standards, efficiency or optimal utilization
of resources and facilities, collaboration and communication, focused professional
development, and global and future orientation.
The heart of all these elements, both human and non-human is the school head, the school
leader. This means that all these factors that contribute to school effectiveness come forth
only with a dynamic and a transformational school leader.
Application-Let’s Apply
1. Form 4 groups. Each group will do a Powerpoint presentation to explain one of the ff 1)
meaning, 2) advantages, 3) disadvantages and 4) demands of SBM.
a. Meaning
b. Advantages
Allows competent individuals in the schools to make decisions that will improve
learning;
Gives the entire school community a voice in key decisions;
Practices focuses accountability for decisions;
Demands greater creativity in the design of programs
Redirects resources to support the goals developed in each school;
Leads to realistic budgeting as parents and teachers become more aware of the school's
financial status, spending limitations, and the cost of its programs;
Improves morale of teachers and nurtures new leadership at all levels.
c. Disadvantages
d. Demands of SBM
Prepared by: