Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    2023 2 39 51208 Order 04-Mar-2024

    Uploaded by

    Amar Naik
    This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding two Special Leave Petition criminal matters. It summarizes the hearing that took place on March 4, 2024 before two Honorable Justices. It notes that the directions from an earlier Supreme Court case regarding furnishing of affidavits are mandatory, but in this case the informant had provided the affidavit belatedly. The Court disposes of the Special Leave Petitions without commenting on the merits as the matter is pending investigation. It also clarifies that the petitioners can approach the court for relief if they feel threatened, and that the Court has made no comments on the merits of the case or in a way that would influence the police investigation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    2023 2 39 51208 Order 04-Mar-2024

    Uploaded by

    Amar Naik
    14 views2 pages
    This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding two Special Leave Petition criminal matters. It summarizes the hearing that took place on March 4, 2024 before two Honorable Justices. It notes that the directions from an earlier Supreme Court case regarding furnishing of affidavits are mandatory, but in this case the informant had provided the affidavit belatedly. The Court disposes of the Special Leave Petitions without commenting on the merits as the matter is pending investigation. It also clarifies that the petitioners can approach the court for relief if they feel threatened, and that the Court has made no comments on the merits of the case or in a way that would influence the police investigation.

    Original Title

    42984_2023_2_39_51208_Order_04-Mar-2024

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding two Special Leave Petition criminal matters. It summarizes the hearing that took place on March 4, 2024 before two Honorable Justices. It notes that the directions from an earlier Supreme Court case regarding furnishing of affidavits are mandatory, but in this case the informant had provided the affidavit belatedly. The Court disposes of the Special Leave Petitions without commenting on the merits as the matter is pending investigation. It also clarifies that the petitioners can approach the court for relief if they feel threatened, and that the Court has made no comments on the merits of the case or in a way that would influence the police investigation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    14 views2 pages

    2023 2 39 51208 Order 04-Mar-2024

    Uploaded by

    Amar Naik
    This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding two Special Leave Petition criminal matters. It summarizes the hearing that took place on March 4, 2024 before two Honorable Justices. It notes that the directions from an earlier Supreme Court case regarding furnishing of affidavits are mandatory, but in this case the informant had provided the affidavit belatedly. The Court disposes of the Special Leave Petitions without commenting on the merits as the matter is pending investigation. It also clarifies that the petitioners can approach the court for relief if they feel threatened, and that the Court has made no comments on the merits of the case or in a way that would influence the police investigation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    SLP(Crl.) No.

    13762/2023

    ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.2 SECTION II

    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

    Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 13762/2023

    (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-09-2023


    in CRLP No. 2370/2021 passed by the High Court for the State of
    Telangana at Hyderabad)

    RAMESH KUMAR BUNG & ORS. Petitioner(s)

    VERSUS

    STATE OF TELANGANA & ANR. Respondent(s)

    (IA No.219799/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED


    JUDGMENT and IA No.219804/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF
    DATES)

    WITH

    SLP(Crl.) No. 13857/2023 (II)


    (IA No.221120/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
    JUDGMENT and IA No.221123/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF
    DATES)

    Date : 04-03-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.

    CORAM :
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

    For Petitioner(s)
    Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, Sr. Adv.
    Mr. Krishna Dev Jagarlamudi, AOR

    Mr. Raavi Yogesh Venkata, AOR


    Ms. Twinkle Rathi, Adv.
    Mr. Kotte Venkata Pawan Kumar, Adv.
    Ms. Thithiksha Padmam, Adv.
    For Respondent(s)
    Mr. Diljit Singh Ahluwalia, Adv.
    Mr. Angad Ahluwalia, Adv.
    Signature Not Verified Mr. Kushal Choudhary, Adv.
    Digitally signed by
    Deepak Guglani
    Date: 2024.03.06
    Mr. R. Ilam Paridi, AOR
    18:00:45 IST
    Reason:

    Ms. Devina Sehgal, AOR


    Mr. Mohd Ashaab, Adv.
    SLP(Crl.) No. 13762/2023

    UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


    O R D E R

    We are of the opinion that the directions given by this Court

    in Mrs. Priyanka Srivastava & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh &

    Ors.1 are mandatory. However, in the facts of the present case, we

    find that the informant had furnished the affidavit, though

    belatedly.

    Recording the aforesaid, we are inclined to dispose of the

    present special leave petitions without making any comments on

    merits, as the matter is pending investigation.

    In case, the petitioners feel any threat, they will be

    entitled to approach the Court for appropriate relief(s).

    We clarify that we have not made any comments and observations

    on the merits of the case. We also clarify that the impugned

    judgment and the observations made by the High Court will not have

    any influence on the investigation conducted by the police.

    (DEEPAK GUGLANI) (R.S. NARAYANAN)


    AR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

    1 (2015) 6 SCC 287.

    You might also like