Validity and Reliability
Validity and Reliability
1: Provide a brief definition of audit evidence and its importance in the context of auditing
Audit evidence is all of the information used by the auditor in arriving at the conclusions on
which the auditor’s opinion is based. Audit evidence is important in auditing because audit
evidence includes the information contained in the accounting records underlying the financial
statements, and other information gathered by the auditors, such as confirmations from third
parties.
2: Explain how audit evidence contributes to the auditor's ability to form an opinion on the
financial statement
Audit evidence obtained directly by the auditor, (e.g., observation, re-performance) is more
reliable than audit evidence obtained indirectly or by inference.
Audit evidence is more reliable when it exists in documentary form, whether paper, electronic, or
other medium.
Audit evidence is more reliable when it is obtained from independent sources outside the entity.
Audit evidence provided by original documents is more reliable than audit evidence provided by
photocopies or facsimiles.
External audit evidence, the types of evidence obtained from the third party.
Evidence obtained directly from the auditor, this is the evidence from the auditor directly.
Evidence from Original document, this is the types of document which is not photocopy.
4: Provide examples for each type to illustrate their significance in the audit process.
Relevance and reliability are crucial in evaluating audit evidence because relevance deals with
the logical connection with the purpose of the audit procedure and the assertion under
consideration. Reliability is influenced by the source and nature of the information, including the
controls over its preparation and maintenance.
6: Provide examples of evidence that may be relevant but less reliable, and vice versa.
i. Observation, is the physical process of observing activities. It is most often used to gain
an understanding of a client’s processing system, including a “walkthrough” of processes.
It is very effective in understanding the nature of processing. It is also a common practice
to observe the client’s process of taking physical inventory. in generalizing the results.
Observation of processing on one day does not necessarily indicate how the transactions
were processed on a different day.
ii. Physical Examination, is useful in verifying the existence of tangible assets and in
identifying potential obsolescence or signs of wear and tear. Although examining
inventory establishes existence, it does not provide evidence on completeness, ownership,
or proper valuation.
iii. Inquiries of Client Personnel, is used extensively to gain an understanding of the
following: The accounting system. Management’s plans for such things as marketable
investments, new products, disposal of lines of business, and new investments, Pending
or actual litigation against the organization and also inquiry is all about asking questions
to the to the people in the management.
8: Explain when auditors might use substantive procedures and when they might employ
tests of controls.
• The auditor must use test of control when is need to test the operating effectiveness of controls
in preventing, or detecting and correcting, material misstatements at the assertion level.
• The auditor must use substantive procedure when is need to measure the detect material
misstatements at the assertion level.
Substantive procedure means the test of the material classes transaction, account balance and
disclosure. WHILE test of control means the test of material of the operating effectiveness of
controls in preventing or detecting or collating material misstatement at the assertion.
• Test the operating effectiveness of controls in preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
misstatements at the assertion level (tests of controls)
12: Discuss key elements of audit documentation, including the nature, timing, and extent
of procedures performed.
Documentation of audit evidence, means the auditor is examining the document from the client
either in a paper or electronic form that help to establish the potential existence of liabilities. This
includes number of elements such as;
i. Nature, documentation of audit evidence should state the nature of the business, and kind
of the business.
ii. Time, documentation of the audit evidence should state the time at which the evidence
done.
iii. Extent of the procedure performed, this means that an auditor should states the procedure
used to obtain the audit evidence such as observation, physical examination, enquiry etc.
iv. Place or area, the audit evidence should state the location of the area where the audit
evidence obtained whether internal or external.
13: Identify and explain common challenges faced by auditors in gathering sufficient and
appropriate audit evidence.
i. Level of risk in the area being audited is a challenge to auditor when gathering sufficient
and appropriate audit evidence.
ii. Quality of evidence obtained, also is a challenge that facing an auditor when gathering
the sufficient and appropriate audit evidence
14: Discuss challenges related to the availability, reliability, and completeness of evidence.
15: Highlight the role of professional judgment in evaluating the sufficiency and
appropriateness of audit evidence.
The auditor must evaluate the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the expert, obtain an
understanding of the work done, and evaluate the appropriateness of the work done as audit
evidence.
16: Discuss factors auditors should consider when exercising professional judgment.
The auditor should consider Relevance and Reliability of information as the factors when
exercising the professional judgment of the information to be used as audit evidence when
designing and performing audit procedures. Relevance deals with the logical connection with the
purpose of the audit procedure and the assertion under consideration. The relevance of
information may be affected by the direction of testing.
17: Explore how emerging technologies, such as data analytics and artificial intelligence, are
impacting the gathering and evaluation of audit evidence.
The emerging technologies such as data and artificial intelligence are impacting audit evidence
because it increases laziness and kills creativity of the auditor evidence
18: Discuss potential benefits and challenges associated with the adoption of these technologies.
The potential benefits of the artificial intelligence in gathering and evaluation of the audit
evidence is ………………………………..