Scribd
Upload
8 views

Anova

Based on the ANOVA output, there is a significant difference in the average scores of the three academic methods (F count = 64.877, F table = 3.89, sig = 0.000 < 0.05). The multiple comparisons output shows the differences between each pair of methods using Tukey HSD and Bonferroni. For example, Tukey HSD indicates the standard method and method X have significantly different average scores (mean difference = -8.800, sig = 0.032 < 0.05).

Uploaded by

Kinkin Intan Erzi Larasati
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
8 views

Anova

Based on the ANOVA output, there is a significant difference in the average scores of the three academic methods (F count = 64.877, F table = 3.89, sig = 0.000 < 0.05). The multiple comparisons output shows the differences between each pair of methods using Tukey HSD and Bonferroni. For example, Tukey HSD indicates the standard method and method X have significantly different average scores (mean difference = -8.800, sig = 0.032 < 0.05).

Uploaded by

Kinkin Intan Erzi Larasati
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

ANOVA

Oneway

ANOVA
Data_Nilai
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 2958.400 2 1479.200 64.877 .000
Within Groups 273.600 12 22.800
Total 3232.000 14

with a significance level of 0.05


Degree of freedom (df) numerator : c-1 =3-1 = 2
Df denominator : n-c = 15-3 = 12
Fu = 0,05;2;12 =3,89
F table =
then a decision can be made: in column F the calculated result is 64,877 and F table is 3.89, if F calculated < F table then Ho is accepted and if F
calculated > F table then Ho is rejected.

From the above decision then:


F count (64.877) > F table (3.89) then Ho is rejected, meaning that with a confidence level of 95% there is a difference in the average of the
three academic abilities methods

Based on the ANOVA output above, it is known that the sig value is 0.00<0.05, so it ca n be concluded that the average of the three academic scores is
significantly 'DIFFERENT’
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Data_Nilai
Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval
(I) Metode_Academic (J) Metode_Academic (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD Standard_Method X -8.80000* 3.01993 .032 -16.8568 -.7432
Y -33.20000* 3.01993 .000 -41.2568 -25.1432
X Standard_Method 8.80000* 3.01993 .032 .7432 16.8568
Y -24.40000* 3.01993 .000 -32.4568 -16.3432
Y Standard_Method 33.20000* 3.01993 .000 25.1432 41.2568
X 24.40000* 3.01993 .000 16.3432 32.4568
Bonferroni Standard_Method X -8.80000* 3.01993 .039 -17.1938 -.4062
Y -33.20000* 3.01993 .000 -41.5938 -24.8062
X Standard_Method 8.80000* 3.01993 .039 .4062 17.1938
Y -24.40000* 3.01993 .000 -32.7938 -16.0062
Y Standard_Method 33.20000* 3.01993 .000 24.8062 41.5938
X 24.40000* 3.01993 .000 16.0062 32.7938
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Based on the output above, it is known for Tukey HSD that the sig value is 0.032 < 0.05, so it can be concluded that the academic standard
method and x values are different and the difference in the average descriptive value between the two data is significant. Meanwhile Bonferroni
it is know that the sig value is 0.032<0.05, so it can be concluded same like Tukey HSD.
Next, comparing the other values is done in the same way as above.

You might also like