CPP (Intro, Literature, Methodology)

[CAPSTONE PROJECT PLANNING | GROUP 3]
CHAPTER NO. 1
INTRODUCTION
1|Page
 INTRODUCTION
 The Case Study on Geotechnical Structures unfolds as a comprehensive exploration into the
intricate realm of geotechnical engineering, where the dynamic interplay between soil
mechanics, structural design, and environmental considerations converges to shape the
foundation of sustainable infrastructure. Geotechnical structures, which encompass a
spectrum from foundations and retaining walls to embankments and tunnels, represent the
critical interface between the built environment and the Earth's subsurface. This study
embarks on a nuanced journey, delving into the challenges and triumphs of geotechnical
engineering as it navigates the complexities of modern construction. With a lens focused on
real-world Applications and meticulous analysis, this case study seeks not only to unravel the
intricacies of geotechnical structures but also to illuminate their pivotal role in fostering
sustainability within the broader landscape of infrastructure development.
 As we embark on this exploration, it becomes evident that geotechnical structures are more
than inert components in the construction process; they are the bedrock upon which the
edifice of sustainable development stands. The introduction sets the stage by providing a
contextual backdrop, shedding light on the historical evolution of geotechnical engineering
and its pivotal role in shaping the infrastructure of civilizations past and present. As we
traverse through the annals of history, we encounter the ingenuity of ancient engineers
constructing roads and aqueducts, laying the groundwork for contemporary geotechnical
practices. This historical perspective serves as a compass, guiding us through the evolution of
geotechnical structures and highlighting their adaptive nature in response to the ever-
changing demands of society.
 In tandem with historical insights, the introduction illuminates the challenges that
conventional infrastructure development poses – challenges that have ushered in an era where
the sustainability of our built environment is no longer a mere aspiration but an imperative.
The environmental impact, resource depletion, and economic constraints inherent in
traditional construction practices emerge as formidable obstacles that demand innovative
solutions. It is against this backdrop that geotechnical engineering emerges as a linchpin in
the quest for sustainable infrastructure, wielding its principles and practices to navigate the
delicate balance between progress and environmental stewardship.
 The narrative unfolds further as the introduction articulates the need for a paradigm shift in
our approach to infrastructure development, emphasizing the urgency of incorporating
sustainable practices. This sets the stage for a deep dive into the realm of geotechnical
engineering, where the marriage of scientific principles and engineering ingenuity becomes
the catalyst for transformative solutions. The objectives of the case study are outlined with
clarity, with a commitment to unraveling the intricacies of geotechnical structures and their
impact on the overarching goals of sustainability.
 As the journey into the case study on geotechnical structures begins, the reader is invited to
2|Page
traverse a terrain that encompasses not only the technical aspects of soil mechanics and
structural design but also the broader considerations of environmental impact, resource
efficiency, and societal well-being. This case study is not merely a technical exposition; it is a
narrative that underscores the symbiotic relationship between the Earth beneath our feet and
the structures that define our modern landscape. In doing so, it aspires to contribute not only
to the body of knowledge within geotechnical engineering but also to the broader discourse
on building a sustainable future.
3|Page
 Introduction to Geotechnical Case Study:

Geotechnical engineering, the silent orchestrator of stability beneath our built environment,
emerges as a pivotal discipline bridging the gap between the subterranean world and the structures
that grace our skylines. As we embark on a comprehensive exploration of a geotechnical case
study, our narrative unfolds within the context of a dynamic urban landscape, where the demands of
modern construction intersect with the complex nature of the Earth's crust.
1. The Essence of Geotechnical Engineering:

 At its essence, geotechnical engineering is an intricate dance between soil mechanics and
structural design. This case study serves as a microcosm of the broader discipline,
encapsulating the challenges and innovations that engineers encounter as they navigate the
dynamic interplay between the built environment and the subsurface. From foundation
design intricacies to slope stability considerations, the study unravels the layers of
complexity inherent in geotechnical decision-making.
2. The Urban Canvas:

 Our case study unfolds in a bustling urban setting, where the stakes are high, and the soil
beneath our feet holds the key to the stability of towering structures. In the urban landscape,
geotechnical challenges take centre stage, demanding a sophisticated understanding of soil
properties, geological nuances, and the interplay between existing and proposed structures.
3. Foundation Design Dilemmas:

 The initial chapters of our case study delve into the heart of geotechnical decision-making—
the foundation. Here, engineers are confronted with a delicate balance between the load-
bearing capacity of the soil, the economic constraints of the project, and the need for a stable
base for a high-rise structure. Foundation design becomes an art of equilibrium, where
structural integrity meets the pragmatic realities of construction.
4. Navigating Slope Stability:

 Beyond the horizontal plane, our case study ventures into the challenges of slopes. In an era
where construction often grapples with hilly terrains, the study illuminates the
methodologies employed to mitigate risks associated with slope instability. Engineers must
consider not only the vertical load but also the dynamic forces acting parallel to the Earth's
surface, demanding a nuanced approach to slope stability.
5. Environmental Dynamics and Geotechnical Engineering:

 The case study extends its gaze beyond the purely structural aspects, acknowledging the
dynamic nature of the environment. Factors such as climate change and fluctuating
4|Page
groundwater levels become integral considerations. Geotechnical engineering is not merely

about static stability; it is about creating structures that can adapt to the evolving
environmental landscape.
6. Interaction with Existing Structures:

 In the intricate tapestry of urban development, new construction seldom occurs in isolation.
The case study illuminates the challenges posed by existing structures—foundations,
utilities, and substructures. Geotechnical engineers must choreograph their decisions to
harmonize with the existing built environment, ensuring that the introduction of new
structures does not compromise the stability of the surrounding structures.
7. Tools and Techniques:

 As our case study unfolds, it reveals the arsenal of tools and techniques at the disposal of
modern geotechnical engineers. Advanced geophysical surveys, real-time monitoring
systems, and innovative laboratory testing methods all become integral components of the
engineer's toolkit. These technologies not only enhance precision but also empower
engineers to make informed decisions in the face of uncertainties.
8. Sustainability and Resilience:

 Our exploration transcends the conventional notions of stability. It ventures into the realm of
sustainability and resilience, where geotechnical engineering becomes a proactive force in
creating structures that can withstand the test of time and unforeseen challenges. The case
study showcases how the discipline contributes to the broader ethos of sustainable and
resilient urban development.
9. The Promise of the Geotechnical Case Study:

 As we embark on this geotechnical expedition, the case study emerges not merely as a
documentation of challenges but as a testament to the transformative power of engineering.
It invites us to witness the nuanced decision-making, the analytical prowess, and the
innovative solutions that define the realm of geotechnical engineering. This case study
promises to unravel the layers beneath the surface, revealing the intricate dance between soil
and structure that shapes the very foundations of our built environment.
5|Page
1. GEOTECHNICAL STRUCTURES
The domain of geotechnical engineering represents a dynamic interface where the intricacies of
the natural environment intersect with the principles of structural design. Geotechnical structures,
integral components within this complex interplay, embody a specialized category of engineering
solutions meticulously tailored to navigate the nuanced challenges presented by the Earth's
subsurface. Encompassing foundations, retaining walls, tunnels, and other pivotal elements of
civil engineering, geotechnical structures constitute an unseen yet indispensable framework
within our constructed environment. Fundamentally addressing the demands of soil mechanics,
foundation design, and the distinctive geological characteristics that define the terrains on which
we erect our infrastructure, geotechnical engineering emerges as the linchpin of stability in
structural endeavors. This introductory discourse serves as a gateway into the domain of
geotechnical structures, wherein structural stability not only attests to engineering prowess but
also signifies a harmonious collaboration between human ingenuity and the forces latent beneath
the Earth's surface. Within the contours of this exploration lies a journey to unravel complexities,
decipher challenges, and gain an appreciation for the pivotal role that geotechnical structures play
in sculpting a sustainable and resilient built environment.
2. TYPES OF GEOTECHNICAL STRUCTURES

Geotechnical structures encompass a diverse range of engineering solutions designed to address
specific challenges related to soil mechanics, foundation support, and stability. Here are several
types of geotechnical structures, each tailored to meet distinct engineering requirements:
1. Shallow Foundations:
6|Page
a. Isolated Footings:
 Description: These are individual supports for columns or point loads, transferring loads
directly to the soil.
 Application: Commonly used in residential and small commercial structures.
b. Strip Footings:
 Description: Elongated foundations that support load-bearing walls, distributing loads over
a wider area.
 Application: Suitable for structures with continuous walls, like residential or light
commercial buildings.
c. Mat or Raft Foundations:
 Description: Large, reinforced concrete slabs covering the entire building footprint.
 Application: Used when soil bearing capacity is low or when heavy loads need to be
distributed uniformly.
d. Combined Footings:
 Description: Support multiple columns, combining aspects of isolated and strip footings.
 Application: Employed when individual footings are impractical due to proximity or load-
sharing considerations.
7|Page
2. Deep Foundations:
a. Pile Foundations:
 Description: Long, slender structural elements driven or drilled into the ground, transferring
loads through friction or end-bearing.
 Application: Suitable for areas with weak or compressible soils, often used in waterfront
structures.
b. Drilled Shafts (Caissons):
 Description: Large-diameter cylindrical excavations filled with concrete, providing support
through end-bearing or skin friction.
 Application: Commonly used for bridges, towers, and high-rise buildings.
c. Pier Foundations:
8|Page
 Description: Similar to pile foundations but typically larger in diameter, supporting vertical
columns.
 Application: Widely used in bridge construction and large-scale infrastructure projects.
d. Well Foundations:
 Description: Used in underwater construction, involving sinking cylindrical structures into
riverbeds or sea-beds.
 Application: Mainly utilized in bridge construction, particularly in locations with water
crossings.
3. Retaining Walls:
a. Gravity Retaining Walls:

 Description: Relies on its weight to resist soil pressure.
 Application: Suitable for retaining moderate to low soil loads.
b. Cantilever Retaining Walls:
 Description: Utilizes a base slab and an upright stem to resist soil pressure.
 Application: Commonly used in residential and commercial construction.
c. Counterfort Retaining Walls:
 Description: Similar to cantilever walls but includes additional vertical supports
(counterforts) on the backside.
 Application: Used for taller retaining walls or when additional support is needed.
9|Page
4. Slope Stability Measures:
a. Slope Reinforcement:
 Description: Involves adding materials like
geogrids or retaining walls to stabilize
natural or artificial slopes.
 Application: Mitigates erosion and landslide

risks in areas with sloping terrain.
b. Soil Nailing:
 Description: Installing closely spaced bars or nails
into the slope to enhance stability.
 Application: Commonly used in road and railway

cuttings to prevent slope failures.
5. Tunnels:
a. Cut-and-Cover Tunnels:
 Description: Constructed by excavating a trench, building the structure, and then covering
it.
 Application: Common in urban areas for transportation infrastructure.
10 | P a g e
b. Bored Tunnels:
 Description: Constructed using tunnel boring machines or drilling methods.
 Application: Utilized for long-distance transportation, such as subways or underground
utilities.
6. Earth Dams:
a. Embankment Dams:
 Description: Constructed by compacting layers of earth to form a barrier against water flow.
 Application: Used for water storage, flood control, and hydropower.
11 | P a g e
b. Concrete Dams:
 Description: Built using concrete to form a watertight barrier.
 Application: Commonly used for high-load requirements in large-scale water reservoirs.
7. Sheet Piles and Cofferdams:
a. Sheet Piles:
 Description: Interlocking steel sheets driven
into the ground to provide lateral support.
 Application: Used in waterfront structures,
excavation support, and flood control.
12 | P a g e
b. Cofferdams:
 Description: Temporary
structures used to isolate an
area from water during
construction.
 Application: Common in
underwater construction,
creating a dry work
environment.
8. Ground Improvement Techniques:
a. Compaction:
 Description: Increasing soil density to enhance load-bearing capacity.
 Application: Commonly used in areas with loose or uncompacted soil.
b. Grouting:
 Description: Injecting a cementitious or chemical mixture into the soil to improve its
properties.
 Application: Used to stabilize loose soils or control water flow.
c. Soil Reinforcement:
 Description: Adding materials like geotextiles or geogrids to enhance soil strength.
 Application: Mitigates slope instability and increases load-bearing capacity.
13 | P a g e
9. Geosynthetics Applications:
a. Geotextiles:
 Description: Porous fabrics used
for soil separation, filtration, and
reinforcement.
 Application: Commonly used in
road construction and erosion
control.
b. Geogrids:
 Description: Grid-like structures
used to reinforce soil.
 Application: Enhances stability in
retaining walls and slopes.
c. Geomembranes:
 Description: Impermeable
membranes used for containment
or barriers.
 Application: Used in landfill
liners, pond liners, and reservoirs.
10. Bridge Foundations:
a. Deep Foundation Systems:

 Description: Varied foundation types based on site-specific conditions, including piles,
14 | P a g e
drilled shafts, and footings.

 Application: Critical for ensuring the stability and longevity of bridges, considering factors
such as soil bearing capacity and potential scour.
Each type of geotechnical structure serves a specific purpose, addressing the unique challenges
posed by different projects and geological conditions. The selection and design of these structures
require a comprehensive understanding of soil mechanics, structural engineering principles, and
site-specific factors to ensure the stability, safety, and sustainability of the built environment.
CHAPTER NO. 2
LITREAUTRE
SURVEY
15 | P a g e
 LITERATURE REVIEW & PROBLEM

IDENTIFICATION
1. Literature Review & Problem Identification for Shallow Foundations
I. Introduction to literature
16 | P a g e
1.1 Background:
The use of shallow foundations in construction is a fundamental aspect of geotechnical engineering,
providing support for structures where the depth of the foundation is comparable to or less than its
width. As a critical component of civil engineering, shallow foundations play a pivotal role in
ensuring the stability and safety of various structures.
1.2 Significance of Shallow Foundations:

The significance of shallow foundations lies in their applicability to a wide range of structures,
including residential buildings, commercial establishments, and small industrial facilities.
Understanding the state-of-the-art in shallow foundation design and identifying potential challenges
is crucial for ensuring the efficiency and safety of construction projects.
II. Literature Review
2.1 Soil Mechanics and Bearing Capacity:

Understanding the soil mechanics underlying shallow foundation design is paramount. Classic
theories, such as Terzaghi's bearing capacity equation, form the basis for assessing the load-bearing
capacity of soils. A review of literature will delve into how variations in soil types, compaction, and
moisture content influence the bearing capacity and, consequently, the design of shallow
foundations.
2.2 Types of Shallow Foundations:

Different types of shallow foundations, including isolated footings, strip footings, mat or raft
foundations, and combined footings, present distinct advantages and challenges. An exploration of
case studies and research findings will provide insights into the appropriate selection of these
foundation types based on specific structural and geotechnical requirements.
2.3 Foundation Settlement:

One of the critical concerns in shallow foundation design is settlement. Literature will be reviewed
to analyse the factors contributing to settlement, methods for predicting settlement, and techniques
for minimizing and controlling settlement to ensure the long-term stability of structures.
2.4 Site-Specific Considerations:

The geotechnical characteristics of a site play a pivotal role in the design and performance of
shallow foundations. A comprehensive review will encompass the impact of soil properties,
groundwater conditions, and geological features on the behaviour of shallow foundations.
III. Problem Identification
3.1 Challenges in Shallow Foundation Design:

Identifying challenges in shallow foundation design is essential for addressing potential issues in
construction projects. This section will analyse common challenges, such as inadequate bearing
17 | P a g e
capacity, differential settlement, and the influence of adjacent structures.
3.2 Urban Construction and Limited Space:

In urban environments, where space is often constrained, the design and construction of shallow
foundations face unique challenges. This part of the literature review will focus on case studies and
research addressing how engineers overcome limitations in space while ensuring the stability of
shallow foundations.
3.3 Expansive Soils and Soil-Structure Interaction:

The presence of expansive soils poses a significant challenge to shallow foundation performance.
Literature will be reviewed to understand how expansive soils affect foundations and how
engineers mitigate the potential for heave or settlement. Additionally, the interaction between the
foundation and the surrounding soil will be explored.
IV. Conclusion
4.1 Summary of Literature Review:

Summarizing the literature review will provide a clear understanding of the current state of
knowledge regarding shallow foundations, encompassing soil mechanics, foundation types,
settlement considerations, site-specific challenges, and urban construction constraints.
4.2 Identified Gaps and Research Opportunities:

The conclusion will highlight any identified gaps in the existing literature and propose avenues for
further research. Addressing these gaps will contribute to advancements in shallow foundation
design and construction practices.
18 | P a g e
2. Literature Review & Problem Identification for Deep Foundations
I. Introduction
1.1 Background:
Deep foundations play a crucial role in providing structural support for buildings and infrastructure
when shallow foundations are impractical due to poor soil conditions or the need to transfer heavy
loads to deeper, more competent layers. Understanding the current state of knowledge in deep
foundation design is essential for ensuring the stability and safety of construction projects.
1.2 Significance of Deep Foundations:

The significance of deep foundations lies in their ability to effectively transfer loads to stable soil or
rock layers, making them indispensable for structures with substantial vertical loads, expansive
structures, or challenging soil conditions. A thorough literature review is essential to identify
advancements, challenges, and best practices in the field of deep foundations.
2.1 Types of Deep Foundations:

A comprehensive review will encompass various types of deep foundations, including pile
19 | P a g e
foundations, drilled shafts (caissons), pier foundations, and well foundations. Examining case
studies and research findings will provide insights into the selection, design, and performance of
these foundation types under different geological and structural conditions.
2.2 Soil-Structure Interaction:

Understanding the interaction between deep foundations and the surrounding soil or rock is critical.
Literature will be reviewed to analyse the methods used to assess soil-structure interaction,
including considerations for lateral loads, settlement, and the impact of dynamic forces.
2.3 Load-Bearing Capacity and Settlement:

Deep foundations are designed to carry heavy loads, and an in-depth review will focus on methods
for estimating load-bearing capacity, settlement analysis, and the influence of various factors such
as soil properties, foundation geometry, and construction methods.
2.4 Design Considerations:

The literature review will explore design considerations for deep foundations, including the role of
geotechnical investigations, site-specific conditions, and the incorporation of safety factors. Case
studies will be examined to understand how design practices have evolved and adapted to different
project requirements.
3.1 Challenges in Deep Foundation Design:

Identifying challenges in deep foundation design is crucial for addressing potential issues in
construction projects. This section will analyse common challenges such as encountering
unexpected subsurface conditions, achieving the desired depth, and optimizing foundation
performance in complex geological settings.
3.2 Construction Challenges:

The construction of deep foundations presents unique challenges, including the use of specialized
equipment, working in confined spaces, and addressing environmental considerations. The
literature review will highlight case studies and research addressing innovative construction
techniques and overcoming logistical challenges.
3.3 Monitoring and Maintenance:

Deep foundations require ongoing monitoring and maintenance to ensure their continued
performance. The literature review will explore methods for monitoring foundation behaviour,
detecting early signs of issues, and implementing effective maintenance strategies to extend the
lifespan of deep foundations.
IV. Conclusion
20 | P a g e

Summarizing the literature review will provide a comprehensive understanding of the current
knowledge regarding deep foundations, covering types, soil-structure interaction, load-bearing
capacity, design considerations, and construction challenges.

The conclusion will highlight any identified gaps in the existing literature and propose potential
research opportunities. Addressing these gaps will contribute to advancing the field of deep
foundation design and construction practices.
21 | P a g e
3. Literature Review & Problem Identification for Retaining Walls
I. Introduction
1.1 Background:
Retaining walls serve a critical function in civil engineering by providing structural support to resist
lateral pressure from soil. A comprehensive understanding of the current state of knowledge in
retaining wall design is essential for ensuring the stability and longevity of these structures.
1.2 Significance of Retaining Walls:

The significance of retaining walls lies in their ability to prevent soil erosion, control slopes, and
create usable spaces on uneven terrain. A thorough literature review is imperative to identify
advancements, challenges, and best practices in the design and construction of retaining walls.
2.1 Types of Retaining Walls:

A comprehensive review will encompass various types of retaining walls, including gravity
retaining walls, cantilever retaining walls, counterfort retaining walls, and anchored retaining walls.
Analysing case studies and research findings will provide insights into the selection, design, and
performance of these wall types under different geological and site-specific conditions.
2.2 Soil Mechanics and Slope Stability:

Understanding the soil mechanics underlying retaining wall design is paramount. The literature
review will delve into classic soil mechanics theories, slope stability analysis, and the impact of soil
properties on the behaviour of retaining walls.
2.3 Construction Materials and Techniques:

An examination of the literature will focus on the use of different construction materials (such as
concrete, gabions, or reinforced earth) and construction techniques employed in retaining wall
projects. Case studies will be reviewed to understand the practical implications and performance of
these materials and techniques.
2.4 Drainage Considerations:

Drainage is a crucial aspect of retaining wall design to alleviate hydrostatic pressure. The literature
review will explore drainage methods, including the use of weep holes, geocomposite drains, and
granular backfill, to prevent water accumulation behind retaining walls and ensure long-term
stability.
3.1 Challenges in Retaining Wall Design:

22 | P a g e
Identifying challenges in retaining wall design is essential for addressing potential issues in
construction projects. This section will analyse common challenges such as wall height limitations,
poor soil conditions, and the impact of adjacent structures on the performance of retaining walls.
3.2 Environmental Considerations:

Retaining walls are often subjected to environmental stressors such as rainfall, temperature
variations, and seismic activity. The literature review will highlight case studies and research
addressing the environmental challenges faced by retaining walls and innovative solutions to
mitigate these challenges.
3.3 Maintenance and Monitoring:

Retaining walls require ongoing monitoring and maintenance to ensure their continued
performance. The literature review will explore methods for monitoring wall behaviour, detecting
signs of distress, and implementing effective maintenance strategies to enhance the longevity of
retaining walls.
IV. Conclusion

Summarizing the literature review will provide a comprehensive understanding of the current
knowledge regarding retaining walls, covering types, soil mechanics, construction materials, and
drainage considerations.

The conclusion will highlight any identified gaps in the existing literature and propose potential
research opportunities. Addressing these gaps will contribute to advancing the field of retaining
wall design and construction practices.
23 | P a g e
4. Literature Review & Problem Identification for Slope Stability Measures:

Slope Reinforcement and Soil Nailing
I. Introduction
1.1 Background:
Slope stability is a critical aspect of geotechnical engineering, especially in areas prone to erosion,
landslides, and natural slope failures. Slope stability measures, such as reinforcement and soil
nailing, are essential techniques employed to mitigate the risks associated with unstable slopes.
This literature review aims to provide insights into the current state of knowledge, advancements,
challenges, and best practices in slope stability measures.
24 | P a g e
1.2 Significance of Slope Stability Measures:

Understanding the significance of slope stability measures is crucial for safeguarding infrastructure
and preventing disasters related to slope failures. This review seeks to explore the effectiveness of
slope reinforcement and soil nailing in ensuring the stability of natural and man-made slopes.
2.1 Slope Reinforcement:
2.1.1 Mechanisms and Principles:

 Exploration of classical slope reinforcement mechanisms.
 Overview of reinforcement materials, including geogrids, geotextiles, and retaining walls.
2.1.2 Case Studies:

 In-depth analysis of case studies illustrating successful slope reinforcement projects.
 Examination of challenges faced and lessons learned in implementing slope reinforcement
techniques.
2.2 Soil Nailing:
2.2.1 Principles of Soil Nailing:

 Review of the fundamental principles of soil nailing, including drilling techniques and nail
materials.
 Exploration of how soil nailing provides stabilization to slopes and prevents erosion.
2.2.2 Performance Evaluation:

 Analysis of case studies showcasing the performance of soil nailing in various geological
settings.
 Examination of factors influencing the success of soil nailing projects.
2.3 Combined Approaches:
2.3.1 Integration of Reinforcement and Soil Nailing:

 Exploration of case studies where a combination of slope reinforcement and soil nailing was
employed.
 Assessment of the synergies and challenges associated with integrating these approaches.
2.3.2 Sustainable Slope Stability Measures:

 Review of literature focusing on sustainable practices in slope stability, considering
ecological impacts and long-term effectiveness.

25 | P a g e
3.1 Challenges in Slope Stability Measures:
3.1.1 Geological Challenges:

 Identification of challenges associated with specific geological conditions affecting the
success of slope reinforcement and soil nailing.
3.1.2 Environmental Impact:

 Assessment of the environmental impact of slope stability measures, including potential
disruption to ecosystems and habitats.
3.2 Technological Challenges:
3.2.1 Technological Limitations:

 Identification of technological limitations in current slope reinforcement and soil nailing
practices.
 Exploration of areas requiring technological advancements.
3.2.2 Cost and Resource Constraints:

 Analysis of challenges related to the cost-effectiveness and resource constraints in
implementing slope stability measures.
3.3 Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance:
3.3.1 Monitoring Techniques:

 Exploration of monitoring techniques used to assess the ongoing performance of slope
stability measures.
 Identification of challenges in establishing effective long-term monitoring programs.
3.3.2 Maintenance Strategies:

 Analysis of maintenance strategies to address deterioration or changes in soil conditions
over time.
 Exploration of case studies highlighting successful maintenance practices.
IV. Conclusion
4.1.1 Key Findings:

 Summarization of key findings from the literature review on slope reinforcement and soil
26 | P a g e
nailing.
 Overview of successful applications and critical insights gained.
4.1.2 Knowledge Gaps:

 Identification of existing gaps in knowledge and areas requiring further research.
 Recapitulation of the importance of slope stability measures in geotechnical engineering.

The conclusion will emphasize identified gaps in the existing literature and propose potential
research opportunities. Addressing these gaps will contribute to advancing the field of slope
stability measures, making them more effective, sustainable, and resilient.
27 | P a g e
5. Literature Review & Problem Identification for Tunnels
I. Introduction
1.1 Background:
28 | P a g e
Tunnels are critical infrastructural elements, providing efficient transportation and utility conduits
through various geological conditions. A comprehensive understanding of the current state of
knowledge in tunnel engineering is essential for ensuring the safety, functionality, and longevity of
these underground structures.
1.2 Significance of Tunnels:

The significance of tunnels spans transportation, utilities, and various engineering applications.
This literature review aims to explore the advancements, challenges, and best practices in tunnel
engineering to ensure the successful planning, design, and construction of tunnels.
2.1 Types of Tunnels:

2.1.1 Conventional Tunnels:
 Examination of case studies and research on conventional tunnelling methods, including
drilling and blasting.
 Analysis of challenges and innovations in traditional tunnel construction.
2.1.2 Mechanized Tunnelling:

 Review of literature on mechanized tunnelling methods, such as tunnel boring machines
(TBMs).
 Exploration of case studies showcasing successful applications and advancements in
mechanized tunnelling.
2.2 Geological Considerations:

2.2.1 Ground Conditions:
 Exploration of literature detailing the impact of varying ground conditions on tunnel
construction.
 Identification of challenges and solutions related to geological factors.
2.2.2 Rock Mechanics:

 Review of advancements in rock mechanics relevant to tunnelling.
 Analysis of case studies illustrating the application of rock mechanics principles in tunnel
design and construction.
2.3 Tunnel Design and Structural Considerations:

2.3.1 Structural Integrity:
 Examination of literature focusing on the structural design of tunnels to ensure stability and
safety.
 Identification of key design considerations and innovations.
29 | P a g e
2.3.2 Ventilation and Lighting:

 Review of literature on ventilation and lighting systems in tunnels.
 Exploration of sustainable and efficient approaches to address environmental and safety concerns.
2.4 Operational Technologies:

2.4.1 Monitoring and Control Systems:
 Exploration of advanced monitoring and control systems for tunnel operations.
 Analysis of case studies demonstrating the effectiveness of real-time monitoring
technologies.
2.4.2 Safety and Emergency Response:

 Review of literature on safety measures and emergency response systems in tunnel
environments.
 Identification of innovations and best practices in ensuring the safety of tunnel users.

3.1.1 Urban Tunnelling:
 Identification of challenges specific to tunnel construction in urban environments.
 Analysis of case studies illustrating successful urban tunnelling projects.
3.1.2 Soft Ground Conditions:

 Exploration of challenges related to tunnelling in soft ground conditions.
 Review of case studies highlighting innovative solutions to address soft ground challenges.
3.2 Environmental Concerns:

3.2.1 Sustainability:
 Analysis of literature addressing sustainability in tunnel construction.
 Identification of environmental concerns and solutions related to tunnel infrastructure.
3.2.2 Biodiversity and Habitat Preservation:

 Review of literature focusing on the impact of tunnel construction on biodiversity.
 Exploration of methods to minimize ecological disruption during tunnel projects.
3.3 Long-Term Maintenance and Rehabilitation:

3.3.1 Aging Infrastructure:
 Examination of challenges associated with the aging of tunnel infrastructure.
 Analysis of strategies for the maintenance and rehabilitation of older tunnels.
30 | P a g e
3.3.2 Technological Obsolescence:

 Identification of challenges related to the obsolescence of tunnelling technologies.
 Exploration of research opportunities to enhance and modernize tunnel construction
methods.
IV. Conclusion

4.1.1 Key Findings:
 Summarization of key findings from the literature review on tunnel engineering.
 Overview of successful applications, challenges, and innovations.

 Recapitulation of the importance of continuous advancements in tunnel engineering.

research opportunities. Addressing these gaps will contribute to advancing the field of tunnel
engineering, making tunnel construction more efficient, sustainable, and resilient.
31 | P a g e
32 | P a g e
6. Literature Review & Problem Identification for Earth Dams
I. Introduction
1.1 Background:
Earth dams are crucial components of civil engineering, providing water storage, flood control, and
irrigation support. Understanding the current state of knowledge in earth dam engineering is
essential for ensuring the safety, stability, and sustainability of these structures.
1.2 Significance of Earth Dams:

The significance of earth dams lies in their multifaceted roles, including water resource
management, environmental conservation, and disaster risk reduction. This literature review aims
to explore advancements, challenges, and best practices in earth dam engineering.
2.1 Types of Earth Dams:

2.1.1 Embankment Dams:
 Examination of case studies and research on embankment dam construction.
 Analysis of challenges and innovations in traditional embankment dam design and
construction.
2.1.2 Earth fill and Rockfill Dams:

 Review of literature on earth fill and rockfill dam types.
 Exploration of case studies showcasing successful applications and advancements in these
dam categories.
2.2 Geotechnical Considerations:

2.2.1 Soil Mechanics:
 Exploration of literature detailing the impact of soil mechanics on dam construction.
 Identification of challenges and solutions related to soil properties and behaviour.
2.2.2 Foundation Conditions:

 Review of advancements in understanding and addressing foundation conditions for earth
dams.
 Analysis of case studies illustrating the application of geotechnical principles in dam design
and construction.
2.3 Dam Safety and Risk Management:

2.3.1 Monitoring Systems:
 Examination of literature on monitoring systems for dam safety.
33 | P a g e
 Identification of advanced technologies and methodologies to ensure real-time monitoring

and early warning systems.
2.3.2 Risk Assessment and Mitigation:
 Review of literature focusing on risk assessment and mitigation strategies in dam
engineering.
 Exploration of case studies highlighting successful risk management practices.
2.4 Environmental Considerations:

2.4.1 Ecological Impact:
 Analysis of literature addressing the ecological impact of dam construction.
 Identification of environmental concerns and solutions related to earth dam infrastructure.
2.4.2 Sedimentation Management:

 Exploration of literature on sedimentation management in dam reservoirs.
 Review of case studies highlighting effective sedimentation control measures.

3.1.1 Seismic Considerations:
 Identification of challenges related to seismic considerations in dam construction.
 Analysis of case studies illustrating successful seismic design and retrofitting.
3.1.2 Construction Materials:

 Exploration of challenges related to the availability and suitability of construction materials
for earth dams.
 Review of case studies highlighting innovative material solutions.
3.2 Community Engagement:

3.2.1 Social Impacts:
 Examination of challenges associated with social impacts of dam construction on local
communities.
 Analysis of literature on community engagement and participatory approaches.
3.2.2 Resettlement Issues:

 Review of literature addressing resettlement challenges in dam projects.
 Exploration of case studies illustrating effective resettlement practices.
3.3 Climate Change Adaptation:

3.3.1 Hydrological Changes:
 Identification of challenges posed by hydrological changes due to climate change.
34 | P a g e
 Analysis of literature on adaptive strategies for dam infrastructure.
3.3.2 Extreme Weather Events:

 Exploration of challenges related to extreme weather events and their impact on dam safety.
 Review of case studies showcasing resilient dam designs.
IV. Conclusion

4.1.1 Key Findings:
 Summarization of key findings from the literature review on earth dam engineering.

 Recapitulation of the importance of continuous advancements in earth dam engineering.

research opportunities. Addressing these gaps will contribute to advancing the field of earth dam
engineering, making dam construction more resilient, sustainable, and adaptable to changing
conditions.
35 | P a g e
36 | P a g e
7. Literature Review & Problem Identification for Sheet Piles and Cofferdams
I. Introduction
1.1 Background:
Sheet piles and cofferdams are crucial elements in geotechnical and marine engineering, providing
effective solutions for earth retention, water control, and construction in marine environments. This
literature review aims to explore the current state of knowledge in sheet pile and cofferdam
engineering, focusing on advancements, challenges, and best practices.
1.2 Significance of Sheet Piles and Cofferdams:

The significance of sheet piles and cofferdams lies in their versatility for various applications,
including excavation support, waterfront construction, and foundation stabilization. This review
seeks to provide insights into the engineering principles, innovations, and challenges associated
with these geotechnical and marine structures.
2.1 Types of Sheet Piles:

2.1.1 Steel Sheet Piles:
 Examination of case studies and research on steel sheet piles.
 Analysis of challenges and innovations in the design, installation, and use of steel sheet
piles.
2.1.2 Concrete Sheet Piles:

 Review of literature on the application and performance of concrete sheet piles.
 Exploration of case studies showcasing successful applications and advancements in
concrete sheet pile technology.
2.2 Cofferdam Construction:

2.2.1 Cellular Cofferdams:
 Exploration of literature detailing the design and construction of cellular cofferdams.
 Identification of challenges and solutions related to the use of cellular cofferdams in marine
environments.
2.2.2 Earth and Rockfill Cofferdams:

 Review of literature on earth and rockfill cofferdams.
 Analysis of case studies illustrating successful applications and advancements in earth and
rockfill cofferdam construction.
2.3 Geotechnical Considerations:
2.3.1 Soil-Structure Interaction:
37 | P a g e
 Exploration of literature focusing on the interaction between sheet piles or cofferdams and
the surrounding soil.
 Identification of challenges and innovative solutions in addressing soil-structure interaction.
2.3.2 Seepage Control:

 Review of advancements in seepage control measures for sheet piles and cofferdams.
 Analysis of case studies demonstrating effective seepage control strategies.
2.4 Structural Design and Stability:

2.4.1 Structural Integrity:
 Examination of literature detailing the structural design principles for sheet piles and
cofferdams.
 Identification of challenges and innovations related to ensuring structural integrity.
2.4.2 Stability Analysis:

 Review of literature on stability analysis methods for sheet piles and cofferdams.
 Exploration of case studies illustrating stability challenges and solutions.

3.1.1 Marine Construction:
 Identification of challenges specific to marine construction involving sheet piles and
cofferdams.
 Analysis of case studies illustrating successful marine construction projects.
3.1.2 Difficult Soil Conditions:

 Exploration of challenges related to difficult soil conditions when installing sheet piles or
constructing cofferdams.
 Review of case studies highlighting innovative solutions in challenging soil environments.
3.2 Environmental Concerns:

3.2.1 Ecological Impact:
 Analysis of literature addressing the ecological impact of sheet pile and cofferdam
construction.
 Identification of environmental concerns and solutions related to these geotechnical and
marine structures.
3.2.2 Water Quality and Sedimentation:

 Exploration of challenges related to water quality and sedimentation during sheet pile and
cofferdam construction.
38 | P a g e
 Review of case studies showcasing effective measures to mitigate environmental impacts.
3.3 Integration with Other Structures:

3.3.1 Bridge Foundations and Abutments:
 Identification of challenges and considerations in integrating sheet piles and cofferdams
with bridge foundations and abutments.
 Analysis of literature on successful integration practices.
3.3.2 Port and Harbor Infrastructure:

 Exploration of challenges and innovations in using sheet piles and cofferdams for port and
harbour infrastructure.
 Review of case studies illustrating successful applications in marine environments.
IV. Conclusion

4.1.1 Key Findings:
 Summarization of key findings from the literature review on sheet piles and cofferdams.

 Recapitulation of the importance of continuous advancements in sheet pile and cofferdam
engineering.

research opportunities. Addressing these gaps will contribute to advancing the field of sheet pile
and cofferdam engineering, making these structures more resilient, sustainable, and adaptable to
diverse geotechnical and marine conditions.
39 | P a g e
8. Literature Review & Problem Identification for Ground Improvement
1. Introduction:
 Provide an overview of ground improvement techniques and their significance in
geotechnical engineering. Highlight the importance of addressing soil-related challenges
for sustainable and resilient infrastructure.
2. Historical Evolution:
 Explore the historical development of ground improvement methods, tracing the evolution
from traditional techniques to modern innovations. Understand how past challenges have
influenced the emergence of new solutions.
3. Classifications of Ground Improvement Techniques:

40 | P a g e
 Review existing classifications of ground improvement techniques. Categorize methods

based on physical, chemical, and mechanical principles. Discuss the advantages and
limitations of each category.
4. Physical Techniques:
 Examine physical ground improvement methods, including compaction, vibro-compaction,
and dynamic compaction. Evaluate their effectiveness in enhancing soil density and
reducing settlement.
5. Chemical Techniques:
 Investigate chemical ground improvement methods such as soil stabilization and grouting.
Analyse the impact of chemical agents on soil properties and their long-term effects on
ground stability.
6. Mechanical Techniques:
 Review mechanical ground improvement methods like stone columns, deep soil mixing,
and geosynthetics. Assess their applicability in different soil conditions and loading
scenarios.
7. Combined Techniques:
 Explore hybrid or combined ground improvement techniques. Investigate how integrating
multiple methods can synergistically enhance soil properties and provide comprehensive
solutions to complex geotechnical challenges.
8. Advancements in Ground Improvement:

 Explore recent advancements in ground improvement technologies, including state-of-the-
art equipment, materials, and methodologies. Discuss how these innovations address
limitations of traditional methods.
9. Case Studies:
 Analyse case studies that demonstrate the application of ground improvement techniques in
real-world projects. Assess the performance of these methods under varying geological and
environmental conditions.
10. Performance Monitoring:

 Examine methods for monitoring the performance of ground improvement projects.
Discuss instrumentation, data collection, and analysis techniques to evaluate the success
and efficiency of implemented solutions.
41 | P a g e
11. Challenges in Ground Improvement:

 Identify common challenges associated with ground improvement projects. These may
include site-specific issues, environmental considerations, and uncertainties in predicting
long-term behaviour.
12. Geotechnical Risks and Uncertainties:

 Investigate the geotechnical risks and uncertainties associated with ground improvement.
Address factors such as variability in soil properties, unexpected ground conditions, and
potential project delays.
13. Environmental Impact Assessment:

 Evaluate the environmental impact of ground improvement techniques. Discuss potential
ecological consequences and propose measures to minimize adverse effects on the
surrounding environment.
14. Cost-Benefit Analysis:

 Conduct a cost-benefit analysis of ground improvement projects. Explore the economic
feasibility of various techniques and compare the upfront costs with long-term savings.
15. Sustainability Considerations:

 Assess the sustainability of ground improvement methods, considering their impact on
natural resources, energy consumption, and the overall ecological footprint. Discuss
strategies for achieving environmentally friendly solutions.
16. Regulatory Framework:

 Review existing regulations and standards governing ground improvement projects.
Evaluate how compliance with these standards ensures the safety, quality, and
sustainability of construction practices.
17. Community Engagement:

 Discuss the importance of community engagement in ground improvement projects.
Address potential concerns and ensure that local communities are informed and involved in
decision-making processes.
42 | P a g e
18. Innovative Ground Improvement Research:

 Explore ongoing research initiatives and innovations in ground improvement. Highlight
cutting-edge technologies and methodologies that show promise for addressing current and
future challenges.
19. Lack of Standardization:

 Identify the lack of standardization in ground improvement practices. Discuss how
variations in design approaches and implementation methods contribute to inconsistencies
in project outcomes.
20. Knowledge Gaps:

 Identify gaps in current knowledge related to ground improvement. Discuss areas where
further research and development are needed to advance the understanding and
effectiveness of these techniques.
21. Conclusion:
 Summarize key findings from the literature review, emphasizing the importance of
addressing challenges in ground improvement for sustainable and resilient geotechnical
engineering practices. Propose avenues for future research and problem-solving in this
critical field.
9. Developments in geotechnical engineering studies:
43 | P a g e
1. Digitalization and Data Analytics:

 The increased reliance on digital tools has revolutionized geotechnical engineering
practices. Advanced software and applications facilitate efficient data collection,
analysis, and modelling, streamlining the entire investigative process. This digital shift
has significantly enhanced accuracy and reduced the time required for geotechnical
studies. Furthermore, the integration of Building Information Modelling (BIM) has
fostered improved collaboration among various stakeholders, ensuring a more
comprehensive approach to project planning and execution.
2. Remote Sensing and Monitoring:

 The integration of remote sensing technologies has marked a paradigm shift in
geotechnical investigations. Satellite imagery, LiDAR, and drones are now instrumental
in assessing ground conditions, allowing engineers to gather data from expansive or
challenging terrains. Real-time monitoring systems have become integral for early
detection of potential issues, providing a proactive approach to mitigate risks. These
advancements not only enhance safety but also contribute to the efficiency of ongoing
projects.
3. Advanced Laboratory Testing Techniques:

 Geotechnical laboratories continue to evolve, adopting advanced testing techniques to
gain a deeper understanding of soil and rock behaviour. Innovations in geophysical
methods for non-destructive subsurface characterization provide more accurate and
reliable data. This allows engineers to make informed decisions during the design phase,
leading to structures that are better suited to the specific geotechnical conditions of a
site.
4. Climate Change Adaptation:

 Geotechnical engineering is increasingly focused on addressing the challenges posed by
climate change. Engineers are incorporating climate change impact assessments into
their designs, considering factors such as changing precipitation patterns, rising sea
levels, and the increased frequency of extreme weather events. This proactive approach
ensures that infrastructure is resilient to the evolving climate conditions.
5. Geotechnical Challenges in Urbanization:
44 | P a g e
 With the global trend of urbanization, geotechnical challenges in densely populated

areas are gaining prominence. Engineers are devising innovative foundation designs to
accommodate high-rise structures and managing the impact of construction activities on
existing infrastructure. This involves meticulous planning to minimize disruptions and
ensure the stability of surrounding structures.
6. Energy Geotechnics:
 The energy sector is witnessing increased attention from geotechnical engineers.
Geotechnical challenges associated with energy projects, such as geothermal energy
extraction and underground energy storage, are being explored. The aim is to ensure the
sustainable development of energy-related infrastructure with a focus on long-term
stability.
7. Advancements in Ground Improvement Techniques:
 Ground improvement techniques are undergoing continuous advancements to meet the
demands of modern infrastructure. Ongoing research explores innovative methods to
enhance soil properties and provide robust support for heavier loads. This includes the
development of more efficient and sustainable ground improvement solutions tailored to
specific geological conditions.
8. Sustainable Geotechnics:
 Sustainability is a key consideration in contemporary geotechnical engineering.
Engineers are adopting environmentally friendly practices, including the use of recycled
materials in construction. Additionally, the exploration of low-impact foundation
solutions aligns with the broader industry goal of minimizing the environmental
footprint of geotechnical projects.
9. Risk Assessment and Management:

 Geotechnical design approaches have evolved to incorporate advanced risk assessment
and management strategies. Probabilistic modelling and risk-based methodologies
enhance the reliability of infrastructure by identifying potential risks and uncertainties.
This approach allows engineers to implement targeted mitigation measures, ensuring the
resilience of geotechnical structures.
10. Smart Geosynthetics:
45 | P a g e
 The development of smart geosynthetics is a cutting-edge trend in geotechnical

engineering. These materials incorporate embedded sensors for real-time monitoring of
various parameters. Smart geosynthetics offer valuable insights into the performance of
geotechnical structures, enabling engineers to respond promptly to changing conditions
and potential issues.
 The visualized
analysis of
geotechnical
data in three-
dimensional.
 Geotechnical
Remote
Sensing and
Monitoring.
46 | P a g e
 Advanced Laboratory Testing Techniques
47 | P a g e
48 | P a g e
 Climate Change Adaptation
 Energy Geotechnics
49 | P a g e
50 | P a g e
 Understanding Geotechnical Challenges: A Comprehensive Exploration
Geotechnical engineering, as the bedrock of construction and infrastructure development, confronts

a myriad of challenges that render each site a distinctive puzzle. This in-depth exploration delves
into the intricacies of these challenges, acknowledging the site-specific nature of geotechnical
studies, the uncertainties entwined with soil behaviour, the constraints posed by limited data
availability, the dynamic evolution of soil over time, the scale effects inherent in laboratory testing,
the intricate complexity of interactions, the challenges posed by certain soil types, the
transformative influence of construction processes, the environmental considerations shaping
geotechnical studies, and the nuanced balance between project constraints and the depth of
investigations, all while recognizing the pivotal role of human factors in interpreting geotechnical
data.
1. Site-Specific Nature:
 Geotechnical studies, by their very essence, are inherently site-specific endeavours. The
recognition that soil and geological conditions can exhibit substantial variation from one
locale to another underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the local context.
This site specificity emphasizes the imperative for tailor-made solutions that not only
acknowledge but embrace the unique challenges posed by each geographical setting.
2. Uncertainties in Soil Behaviour:

 The intricate nature of soil behaviour introduces a layer of uncertainty that permeates
geotechnical analyses. Soil responses under diverse loading conditions are influenced by an
array of factors, rendering precise predictions a formidable challenge. Engineers navigating
this realm of uncertainty often resort to conservative design approaches, a pragmatic
response to account for the potential variability inherent in soil behaviour.
3. Limited Data Availability:

 The efficacy of geotechnical assessments is intricately tied to the availability of
comprehensive and up-to-date data. Unfortunately, the landscape of geotechnical
engineering is marred by instances of incomplete or outdated site information. In such
instances, engineers must adopt a cautious approach in design, incorporating allowances for
uncertainties stemming from limited data availability.
4. Dynamic Nature of Soil:

 Soil, far from static, undergoes a continual process of evolution over time. This dynamism,
influenced by environmental factors, loading conditions, and external forces, necessitates a
nuanced understanding of the long-term changes in soil properties. The evolving nature of
soil introduces an additional layer of complexity into the geotechnical engineering
equation.
5. Scale Effects:
51 | P a g e
 The translation of laboratory findings and small-scale field investigations to the broader
canvas of real-world conditions introduces a unique challenge. Scaling results to represent
the complexities of full-scale geotechnical projects requires a delicate balance and presents
engineers with the ongoing challenge of accurately extrapolating laboratory findings to the
intricate dynamics of real-world scenarios.
6. Complexity of Interaction:
 Geotechnical structures seldom operate in isolation; they exist in intricate symbiosis with
the natural and built environment. Modelling these complex interactions, be it with
surrounding structures, the soil matrix, or groundwater, poses a significant challenge. The
accurate representation of these multifaceted relationships is paramount for ensuring the
stability and performance of geotechnical structures.
7. Limited Understanding of Certain Soil Types:

 The diverse spectrum of soil types presents a unique set of challenges, particularly with
soils such as expansive clays or specific organic compositions. Gaining a comprehensive
understanding of these soils often necessitates the adoption of specialized investigation
techniques. This underlines the perpetual need for advancements in soil characterization
methodologies to meet the demands of diverse soil profiles.
8. Influence of Construction Processes:

 The very act of construction is not inert; it exerts a transformative influence on soil
characteristics. Processes like excavation, compaction, and other construction activities
may induce modifications in the soil's properties, thereby influencing the stability of the
structure. Striking a harmonious balance between the immediate needs of construction and
the long-term stability of the soil is a complex and delicate task.
9. Environmental Considerations:
 The contemporary landscape of geotechnical studies necessitates a conscientious account
of environmental factors. This includes a deep understanding of the impacts of climate
change and the broader ecological context. The evolving environmental terrain introduces
additional complexities and uncertainties that mandate a forward-looking approach in
geotechnical engineering.
10. Cost and Time Constraints:

 While the imperative for thorough geotechnical investigations is undeniable, it comes at a
cost—both in terms of time and budget. The constraints imposed by project schedules and
financial considerations may limit the extent of investigations, potentially resulting in
52 | P a g e
incomplete or less detailed data. Striking a delicate balance between the depth of study and
the practical constraints of a project is an ongoing challenge faced by geotechnical
engineers.
11. Human Factors:

 The interpretation of geotechnical data is not a purely scientific endeavour; it involves a
human element. Variability in interpretations can arise due to a range of factors, including
experience, expertise, and individual judgment. Acknowledging and managing these
human factors are critical to ensuring the accuracy and reliability of geotechnical
assessments.
53 | P a g e
 CONCLUSION
 The exploration of geotechnical structures through an extensive literature survey provides a

panoramic view of the multifaceted dimensions shaping the field. This journey has traversed
a diverse terrain, encompassing the intricacies of shallow and deep foundations, retaining
walls, slope stability measures, tunnels, earth dams, sheet piles, cofferdams, and ground
improvement techniques. Each facet, examined through the lens of scholarly works and
practical insights, illuminates the intricate tapestry that is geotechnical engineering.
 The literature review unveiled the foundational role of geotechnical structures in providing
stability and resilience to diverse infrastructural projects. Shallow foundations, integral to
structures with limited load-bearing requirements, underscore the delicate balance between
soil properties and structural design. Conversely, deep foundations emerge as stalwarts
supporting massive loads, delving into the profound complexities of soil-structure
interaction in challenging geological settings.
 Retaining walls, guardians against soil erosion and slope instability, reveal a fascinating
interplay between structural engineering and earth sciences. The literature has meticulously
unraveled the design considerations and optimization strategies that underpin these vital
components of the built environment. Moreover, the exploration of slope stability measures,
including reinforcement and soil nailing, highlights the evolving methodologies employed
to mitigate the risks associated with unstable terrains.
 Tunnels, as subterranean conduits threading through geological formations, demand an

intricate dance between engineering precision and geological unpredictability. The literature
survey encapsulates the challenges and innovations characterizing tunnel engineering,
illuminating the advances in technology and methodology that have propelled the field
forward.
 Earth dams, monumental structures harnessing the power of water for various purposes,
resonate as feats of geotechnical prowess. The literature reveals a rich tapestry of research
and practice, addressing issues of dam stability, seepage control, and the environmental
implications of these colossal structures.
 Sheet piles and cofferdams, stalwarts of waterfront engineering, form a critical interface
between land and water. The survey delves into the nuances of their design, construction,
and the challenges posed by varying soil conditions and hydraulic forces.
54 | P a g e
 Ground improvement techniques, a spectrum of interventions altering soil properties,

emerge as a dynamic arena where innovation meets necessity. The literature review captures
the evolution of these techniques, from traditional methods to cutting-edge technologies,
underlining their pivotal role in ensuring the stability and performance of geotechnical
structures.
 As the survey unfolds, it becomes evident that the study of geotechnical structures is not a
static endeavor but an evolving dialogue between engineering principles and the dynamic
forces inherent in the Earth. The synthesis of scholarly contributions reveals the resilience
of geotechnical engineering in the face of complex challenges, showcasing the field's
adaptability to advancements in materials, technologies, and methodologies.
 In conclusion, the literature survey serves as a compass navigating the vast landscape of
geotechnical structures. It not only charts the historical evolution of these structures but also
delineates the contemporary trends and emerging frontiers. The narratives interwoven in
these scholarly works illuminate not just the challenges and solutions within geotechnical
engineering but also the ethos of resilience and innovation that defines the discipline. As the
journey through the literature concludes, it leaves an indelible imprint, echoing the enduring
spirit of geotechnical structures as the silent guardians of stability in the ever-shifting
landscape of civil engineering.
55 | P a g e
METHODOLOGY
56 | P a g e
 METHODOLOGY
1. Case Selection:
 Ensure the selection of a diverse range of geotechnical structures, such as
retaining walls, foundations, slopes, tunnels, and dams. This variety aims
to capture different challenges, construction methods, and geological
contexts for a holistic study.
2. Data Collection:
 Gather detailed information including design documents, construction
records, and performance data for the selected geotechnical structures.
This forms the foundation for subsequent analyses and assessments.
3. Site Visits and Field Investigations:

 Conduct on-site visits to the selected structures for a firsthand
understanding. Execute geotechnical field investigations, such as soil
sampling and structural assessments, to gather critical information on the
as-built conditions.
4. Stakeholder Interviews:
 Engage in interviews with key stakeholders involved in the geotechnical
structures’ life cycle. This qualitative insight provides valuable context on
decision-making processes, challenges faced, and lessons learned.
5. Data Analysis:
 Utilize collected data for a detailed analysis of each geotechnical
structure. Evaluate design adequacy, construction effectiveness, and long-
term performance to derive meaningful conclusions.
6. Challenges Identification:
 Identify and categorize challenges faced during the design and
construction phases of each case study. Consider geological,
environmental, and project-specific factors contributing to these
challenges.
57 | P a g e
7. Innovative Solutions:
 Explore innovative solutions and cutting-edge technologies employed to
address identified challenges. Emphasize instances where unconventional
methods led to successful outcomes, showcasing the role of engineering
innovation.
8. Lessons Learned:
 Summarize lessons learned from each case study, extracting insights from
both successes and challenges. Analyse root causes to derive actionable
lessons applicable to future geotechnical engineering projects.
9. Best Practices:
 Derive best practices for geotechnical engineering based on the
cumulative experiences and successes observed across case studies.
Identify overarching principles, methodologies, and strategies contributing
to successful outcomes.
10.Case Study Reports:

 Develop detailed reports for each geotechnical structure, covering various
aspects such as project background, design details, construction
methodologies, performance evaluations, challenges faced, innovative
solutions, lessons learned, and best practices.
11.Comparative Analysis:
 Conduct a comparative analysis across case studies to identify
commonalities, trends, and areas for improvement in geotechnical
engineering practices. This allows for a broader understanding of
industry-wide patterns.
12.Recommendations:
 Provide clear and actionable recommendations for geotechnical engineers,
project managers, and policymakers based on the findings of the case
study analysis. Emphasize strategies for enhancing resilience,
sustainability, and efficiency.
13.Resilience Assessment:
58 | P a g e
 Evaluate the resilience of geotechnical structures to various

environmental, geological, and operational challenges. This includes
assessing their ability to withstand and recover from adverse conditions.
14.Sustainability Evaluation:
 Examine the sustainability aspects of geotechnical structures, considering
environmental impact, resource efficiency, and long-term viability.
Propose measures to enhance sustainability in future projects.
15.Efficiency Analysis:
 Analyse the efficiency of design and construction methodologies
employed in geotechnical projects. Identify areas for optimization,
streamlining processes to enhance overall project efficiency.
16.Monitoring Strategies:
 Investigate the monitoring strategies implemented in the case studies.
Propose recommendations for enhanced real-time monitoring methods to
ensure the continuous assessment of geotechnical structures.
17.Decision-Making Processes:
 Examine the decision-making processes involved in geotechnical projects.
Identify key factors influencing successful outcomes, fostering informed
decision-making in future projects.
18.Root Cause Analysis:

 Conduct a root cause analysis of challenges and failures, identifying
underlying issues. This facilitates the development of preventive measures
to avoid similar issues in future geotechnical projects.
19.Geotechnical Field Investigations Enhancement:

 Propose improvements and advancements in geotechnical field
investigation methods. This aims to enhance the accuracy of site
assessments and provide more robust data for future projects.
20.Environmental Impact Mitigation:

 Suggest measures for mitigating the environmental impact of geotechnical
projects, aligning with sustainability goals. This may include eco-friendly
59 | P a g e
construction methods and restoration plans.
21.Integration with Other Disciplines:

 Explore the integration of geotechnical engineering with other disciplines
such as structural engineering, environmental science, and urban planning.
Identify synergies for more holistic project development.
22.Seismic Considerations:
 Investigate seismic considerations in geotechnical design and
construction. Identify best practices for designing structures that can
withstand seismic events, ensuring safety and stability.
23.Social and Economic Impacts:

 Assess the social and economic impacts of geotechnical projects on local
communities. Consider aspects of community engagement, socioeconomic
development, and the overall well-being of the affected populations.
24.Risk Assessment and Management:

 Explore methodologies for effective risk assessment and management in
geotechnical projects. Propose strategies for identifying, mitigating, and
managing risks throughout the project lifecycle.
25.Technological Advancements:
 Investigate the incorporation of cutting-edge technologies, such as
artificial intelligence and remote sensing, in geotechnical engineering
practices. Evaluate their effectiveness in improving project outcomes.
26.Geotechnical Education and Training:

 Propose improvements in geotechnical education and training programs to
enhance the skills of future practitioners. This includes curriculum
enhancements, practical training, and exposure to real-world projects.
27.Legal and Regulatory Considerations:

 Examine legal and regulatory frameworks governing geotechnical
60 | P a g e
projects. Identify areas for streamlining processes, ensuring compliance,

and improving the overall efficiency of regulatory procedures.
28.Global Comparative Analysis:

 Extend the comparative analysis to a global context, considering
geotechnical engineering practices in different regions and climates.
Identify global trends and adaptability of practices across diverse
environments.
29.Continuous Improvement Framework:

 Develop a continuous improvement framework for geotechnical
engineering. This includes integrating feedback, incorporating lessons
learned, and adapting to evolving technologies for ongoing advancement
in the field.
30.Groundwater Considerations:
 Investigate the impact of groundwater on geotechnical structures. Assess
strategies for managing groundwater levels during construction and their
long-term effects on structure stability.
31.Influence of Climate Conditions:

 Analyse the influence of climate conditions on geotechnical structures.
Consider variations in temperature, precipitation, and environmental factors
affecting construction and performance.
32.Corrosion Analysis:
 Conduct an analysis of corrosion effects on geotechnical structures,
especially in coastal or aggressive environments. Propose corrosion-
resistant materials and protective measures.
33.Material Selection Criteria:

 Evaluate criteria for selecting construction materials, considering factors
such as strength, durability, and environmental impact. Propose guidelines
for optimal material choices.
34.Community Engagement Strategies:
61 | P a g e
 Explore strategies for community engagement in geotechnical projects.

Assess methods for involving local communities in decision-making
processes and addressing concerns.
35.Life Cycle Assessment:

 Perform a life cycle assessment of geotechnical structures. Analyse
environmental impacts from construction to decommissioning, promoting
sustainable life cycle management.
36.Adaptive Design Approaches:

 Investigate adaptive design approaches that consider the evolving nature of
geotechnical projects. Propose methodologies for designing structures with
adaptability to changing conditions.
37.Geospatial Technologies Integration:

 Explore the integration of geospatial technologies like GIS and remote
sensing in geotechnical investigations. Assess their role in enhancing data
accuracy and project planning.
38.Ground Improvement Techniques:

 Analyse ground improvement techniques such as compaction, grouting, and
soil stabilization. Evaluate their effectiveness in enhancing soil properties
for construction.
39.Advanced Modelling and Simulation:

 Investigate the use of advanced modelling and simulation tools in
geotechnical engineering. Assess their applicability for predicting
behaviour and optimizing design.
40.Public Safety Protocols:

 Develop protocols for ensuring public safety during geotechnical
construction. Address measures to minimize disruptions and risks to the
public.
41.Failure Case Studies:

 Study historical geotechnical structure failures. Extract lessons and insights
to prevent similar failures, emphasizing the importance of failure case
62 | P a g e
analysis.
42.BIM Applications:
 Explore Building Information Modelling (BIM) applications in
geotechnical projects. Assess how BIM can enhance collaboration,
visualization, and project coordination.
43.Slope Stability Analysis:

 Conduct a detailed slope stability analysis. Evaluate factors influencing
slope stability and propose measures for preventing landslides and erosion.
44.Non-Destructive Testing Methods:

 Investigate non-destructive testing methods for assessing the condition of
geotechnical structures. Propose guidelines for incorporating these methods
into routine inspections.
45.Erosion Control Measures:

 Explore erosion control measures for geotechnical structures exposed to
water bodies. Assess techniques to mitigate erosion and protect structure
integrity.
46.Land Use Planning Integration:

 Integrate geotechnical considerations into land use planning. Assess how
urban and regional planning can account for geological factors.
47.Robotic and Automation Applications:

 Explore the use of robotics and automation in geotechnical construction and
monitoring. Assess their potential in enhancing efficiency and safety.
48.Ecological Restoration Strategies:

 Develop strategies for ecological restoration post-construction. Consider
methods to rehabilitate sites and minimize environmental impact.
49.Smart Monitoring Systems:

 Investigate the implementation of smart monitoring systems for
geotechnical structures. Assess the role of sensors and data analytics in
real-time monitoring.
63 | P a g e
50.Geotechnical Risk Management Plans:

 Develop geotechnical risk management plans. Identify potential risks and
propose strategies for mitigation, contingency, and risk response.
51.Collaborative Project Delivery Models:

 Explore collaborative project delivery models, such as Design-Build or
Public-Private Partnerships (PPP), in geotechnical projects. Assess their
benefits and challenges.
52.Energy Efficiency Analysis:

 Analyse the energy efficiency of construction methods in geotechnical
engineering. Propose measures to minimize energy consumption and
promote sustainability.
53.Differential Settlement Analysis:

 Conduct a differential settlement analysis. Evaluate potential causes and
propose preventive measures to address differential settlement issues.
54.Smart Infrastructure Integration:

 Explore the integration of geotechnical structures with smart infrastructure
concepts. Assess the potential for enhanced connectivity and data-driven
decision-making.
55.Cultural Heritage Preservation:

 Develop strategies for preserving cultural heritage in geotechnical projects.
Consider methods to protect archaeological sites and historical structures.
56.Inclusive Design Considerations:

 Integrate considerations for inclusivity in geotechnical design. Evaluate
ways to ensure accessibility and accommodation for diverse user groups.
57.Geohazard Assessments:
 Conduct geohazard assessments for potential natural disasters. Propose
strategies for designing structures that can withstand seismic events, floods,
or other geohazards.
58.Biodiversity Impact Mitigation:

 Assess the impact of geotechnical projects on biodiversity. Propose
64 | P a g e
measures to mitigate negative effects and enhance ecological balance.
59.Holistic Environmental Impact Assessments:

 Conduct holistic environmental impact assessments for geotechnical
projects. Evaluate the broader ecological implications and propose
measures for sustainable development.
60.Community Capacity Building:

 Develop strategies for community capacity building in geotechnical
projects. Empower local communities with knowledge and skills to actively
participate in decision-making processes, fostering a collaborative and
sustainable approach.
65 | P a g e
 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS METHODOLOGY

This report contains the following information on geotechnical investigation;
1.1 PLANNING OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROGRAMME
For the given bridges/structures, to carry out soil/subsoil exploration:
 obtain soil & rock samples, both representative and undisturbed (wherever necessary) for
classification tests and other laboratory tests for determining its engineering properties &
studying various foundation options;
 obtain rock cores of NX size by diamond core drilling method using double tube core barrels,
& conducting laboratory tests for determining engineering properties of existing rock, i.e.,
unconfined compressive strength, water absorption, unit weight etc.
1.1.1 SCOPE OF WORK
To investigate the subsurface conditions at proposed borehole locations.
Disturbed and undisturbed samples will be collected from all boreholes to assess the soil / rock
characteristics in laboratory. The summary of the fieldwork is given below:
1.1.2 METHODOLOGY OF INVESTIGATION
The investigation will be planned to obtain the subsurface stratification in the proposed project
site and collect soil samples for laboratory testing to determine the engineering properties such
as shear strength, along with basic engineering classification of the subsurface stratum to arrive
at the foundation design parameters.
1.1.3 DRILLING OF BOREHOLE
For geotechnical investigation work, two drilling rigs will be installed at the specified borehole
location. Stability of rig will be ensured by making level ground. The borehole will be progressed
using one rotary Drilling machine and one clay machine. The machines would be tractor trolley
mounted.
1.1.4 ROCK CORE SAMPLES
Drilling with advanced rotary core drilling method using double tube core barrels as per the
guidelines of IS: 6926-1996. A core barrel and Nx sized bits will be used for drilling and
recovering rock cores. Recovered rock cores will be numbered serially and preserved in good
quality sturdy wooden core boxes as specified in IS: 4078-1980. Rock core recovery and Rock
Quality Designation (RQD) will be computed for every run length drilled.
1.1.5 MACHINE AND MEN MOVEMENT
Both men and machines would make maximum use of existing roads as far as possible followed
by existing kutcha roads/mud tracks leading to the location in forested areas.
66 | P a g e
CHAPTER NO. 4
CASE STUDY
67 | P a g e
Coastal Infrastructure Design, Construction and Maintenance (CDCM)

Design of Marine Structures September 24 –28, 2001
By Derek Gay BSc. MSc. PhD

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
INTRODUCTION
In order to perform this design work properly, the engineer must have a good understanding of the
problems encountered in making subsurface explorations and of the various tools available to make
subsurface explorations. Specialists in soil and rock engineering and/or geology are required for planning,
conducting, and supervising the programs of subsurface explorations.
The types of subsurface information required for design include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Areal extent, depth, and thickness of each identifiable soil stratum, within a limited depth
dependent on the size and nature of the structure, together with a description of the soil including
its degree of density if cohesionless and degree of stiffness if cohesive.
2. Depth to top of rock and the character of the rock, including such items as lithology; areal extent,
depth, and thickness of each stratum; strike, dip, and spacing of joints and bedding planes;
presence of fault and shear zones and state of weathering or decomposition.
3. Location of groundwater and the presence and magnitude of artesian pressures.
4. Engineering properties of the soil and/or rock in-situ such as permeability, compressibility, and
shear strength.
The procedures for obtaining subsurface information may be divided into the two broad categories of
indirect and direct methods. Indirect methods include aerial photography and topographic map
interpretation, and the use of existing geological reports, maps, and soil surveys. Direct methods comprise
the following:
1. Geologic field reconnaissance, including the examination of in situ materials in natural and man-
made exposures such as riverbanks, escarpments, highway and railway cuts, quarries, and
existing shafts and tunnels.
2. Soundings and probing’s.
3. Borings, test pits, trenches, shafts, and audits from which representative disturbed
and/or undisturbed samples of the in-situ materials may be obtained.
4. Simple field tests, such as the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and the static cone penetration
test, whose results have been correlated with engineering properties on a general basis.
5. Field tests such as the vane shear dilatometer and pressure- meter tests, seepage and water-
pressure tests, plate bearing tests, the CBR test, and pile load tests, wherein the engineering
properties of the in-situ materials are measured directly.
1.2 PLANNING AN EXPLORATION PROGRAM
1.2.1 Purpose of Explorations and Phased Execution

The basic purpose of an exploration program is to provide the engineer with knowledge of the
subsurface- conditions at the site of an engineering project. Normally, the explorations provide
68 | P a g e
information required for the safe and economical design of a project and inform the construction engineer.
about the materials and conditions, he will encounter in the field. At times, the explorations may be used
to obtain information for the analysis of the failure of an engineering structure.
Explorations are normally accomplished in a phased sequence as follows:
1. Reconnaissance investigations
2. Explorations for preliminary design
3. Explorations for detailed design
4. Explorations during construction
Each phase of explorations together with the engineering done in that phase discloses problems
that require further investigation in the next phase. Not all phases are required on all projects; the fourth
phase generally is not necessary.
The number, type, location, size, and depth of the explorations are dependent upon the nature and
size of the project and on the degree of complexity and critical nature of the subsurface conditions. A
general rule of thumb is that the cost of the subsurface explorations for design should be in the range of
0.5 to 1.0 percent of the construction cost of the project. The lower percentage is for large projects and for
projects with less-critical subsurface conditions; the higher percentage is for smaller projects and for
projects with critical subsurface conditions. About half the cost would be expended for explorations for
preliminary design and about half for detailed design. A very much smaller amount of money would be
expended for explorations in the reconnaissance investigation phase. No rule of thumb can be given for
the cost of explorations during construction. Such explorations are used to investigate special problems
that may arise during construction or to better delineate the materials in borrow areas or quarries in
connection with the contractor's scheduling of his operations. Generally, they are not required but, when
used, their cost can vary widely from one project to another.
The combined cost of planning the subsurface explorations, supervising the explorations,
laboratory testing, and reporting the results usually amounts to about the same cost as the explorations. In
general, it is justifiable to spend additional money on explorations and related testing and engineering as
long as the savings that can be affected in the project construction cost on the basis of the information
obtained are significantly greater than the cost of the explorations plus related engineering work.
Building codes often specify the minimum number of borings required for a given size and type
of structure. In the case of a lightweight structure that is to be founded in an area of relatively uniform
subsurface conditions, this minimum number of borings generally will suffice, and all borings may be
completed during a single exploration program.
At times, because of deadlines set for completion for the engineering work, the argument is given
that since the information from a full and proper exploration program will not be available in time for use
in the design, the exploration program should be cut. In such cases, the much-preferred procedure is to
proceed with the engineering on the basis of the best assumptions that can be made from the available
subsurface information, but to continue with the full and proper program of explorations and testing. The
information obtained will then either confirm the assumptions made to complete the engineering on time
or indicate where changes in the design assumptions have to be made. Frequently, any modifications
required by the changes indicated by the full exploration program can be made without undue difficulty
and in a timely manner.
The sequence in which the explorations are to be performed is often left to the discretion of the drilling
contractor. In such instances, the sequence will be governed by the ease of operation for the driller.
Movement of the rigs between borings will be kept to a minimum; all borings in one area of the site may be
drilled before those in another area are started. Often it is not only advantageous but essential that the
engineer designate the sequence of the explorations. If, for instance, the borings being drilled are intended
to fill gaps in a geologic profile based on previous explorations, the information from a given boring could
preclude the need for one or more other borings that had been programmed. The sequence may also be
69 | P a g e
dictated by time limitations if the time available for design is short. It is not unusual for project design and
laboratory testing to be concurrent with the explorations. Under these conditions, it may be necessary to
obtain samples first from specific areas in order that testing may progress in a timely fashion.
1.2.2 Type and Number of Drilling Rigs

The types of rigs used will depend primarily on the type, size, and depth of the explorations; the
location of the explorations, that is, whether they are onshore or offshore; the accessibility of the area to
be explored; the types of rigs available in the area; and the terrain or sea conditions. The types of rigs
used for exploration work and their applicability to various conditions are discussed in a subsequent
section. The minimum number of rigs required to perform an exploration program is dependent on the
time available for the execution of the program, the rate of advancement of the holes by the selected rigs,
and the sequence of explorations. The estimated rate of advancement
of the hole should include time allowances for equipment breakdowns, movement of the rigs from one
location to another, and standby due to weather.
1.2.3 Types of Sampling Equipment

The sampling equipment to be used will depend on the type of information required and the
characteristics of the materials to be sampled. If only classification of the soil strata is required, disturbed
samples will suffice and samplers such as the split-tube drive sampler may be used. If, on the other hand,
the ultimate goal is the determination of the engineering properties of the soils by laboratory testing, more
sophisticated equipment such as the thin-wall tube and double-tube core barrel samplers will be required.
The sizes and types of samplers will depend also upon such factors as the presence or absence of gravel;
the maximum size of particle to be sampled; the type of material to be sampled, that is, cohesionless or
cohesive; the density of cohesionless materials; the consistency of cohesive materials; and the location of
the material to be sampled with reference to the groundwater level. The types of samplers available and
the specific conditions under which each may be used are discussed in detail in the paragraphs on
samplers and sampling techniques.
1.3 RECONNAISSANCE INVESTIGATIONS
1.3.1 Purpose and Scope

The reconnaissance investigations provide information for pre-feasibility studies and for planning
the explorations for the succeeding phase, explorations for preliminary design. This program, for a
localized project such as a building that is to be constructed on a pre-selected site, will be somewhat
limited in scope. However, dam or highway project is under consideration, several alternative sites or
alignments must be considered. The information obtained in this phase aids in the selection of the
alternative sites or alignments for investigation. A large portion of the work during this phase falls into
the category of research. Also included would be field reconnaissance by a geologist and soils engineer
plus such geophysical explorations and borings as are deemed essential.
1.3.2 Research
Any investigation begins with a thorough search for all existing information that could shed light on
subsurface conditions at the site, including both old and recent topographic maps, geologic maps, aerial
photographs, geologic and subsurface exploration reports and records of governmental agencies and
private firms, university publications, and articles in engineering and geologic journals. The sources of
70 | P a g e
these items vary from country to country and even between the political subdivisions of a country. One
of the major sources of geologic and topographic information within the continental United States is the
United States Geologic Survey (USGS). The types of information available from the USGS, as well as
from other sources, are discussed below.
1.3.3 Topographic Maps

Various types of maps are useful in the planning of an exploration program. Topographic maps
provide information on the accessibility of the site of the work and the terrain, both of which may exert a
strong influence on the types of rigs used for the work. Topographic maps may also be used in much the
same manner as aerial photographs. Knowledge of geomorphology often will permit a trained observer to
surmise much about the geology of a site on the basis of the landforms and drainage patterns shown on
the topographic maps. The maps do not have the detail of aerial photographs and, therefore, limit the
capabilities of the observer. However, in the complete absence of aerial photographs or as an initial step,
the use of the maps is worthwhile. The amount of information that can be derived from such maps also
depends on the area involved and the amount of detail shown. General characteristics of the soil and/or
rock are commonly revealed by the topography. Geomorphic soil forms such as coastal and flood plains,
deltas, alluvial fans, terraces, dunes, eskers, drumlins, and other features are easily recognized. Swamp
areas normally are designated directly on the maps and the drainage patterns of soils often give an
indication of particle size and the degree of induration. In rock areas, structure is often revealed in such
details as the course of a river or the slope of a hill. Under proper conditions, it is possible to determine
structural features such as dip and strike, folding, faulting, and relative consistency.
The major source of topographic maps of the Caribbean Island states are their respective departments of
Lands and Surveys which were typically were set up under colonial rule. Each map covers a quadrangle
area bounded by lines of latitude and longitude.
Maps covering areas of 7.5' of latitude by 7.5' of longitude are plotted to scales of 1: 24 000 and
1: 31 680 for the continental United States; similar coverage of Puerto Rico is provided at scales of 1: 20
000 and 1: 30 000 and of the Virgin Islands at 1: 24 000. Fifteen- minute maps of the continental United
States are at 1: 62 500; 30' maps are at 1: 125 000 and one-degree maps at 1: 250 000. Maps of Alaska
covering 15'of latitude by 20'to 30'of longitude are available at 1: 63 360; other maps of Alaska are also
available at 1: 250 000 and 1: 1000 000. Hawaii is partially covered by series of maps at 1: 62 500 and 1:
24 000. Some shaded-relief maps and metropolitan area maps are also published by the USGS. A
complete list of all USGS maps is presented in the U.S. Geological Survey (1965) and the supplements
thereto that.4 are published monthly.
Topographic maps of the United States are also produced by the Army Map Service and the
United States Coast and Geodetic Survey (USC&GS). The former is based on the United States Military
Grid and are at scales of 1:25000 for 7.5' quadrangles; 1: 50 000 for 15' quadrangles; and 1: 250 000 for
30' quadrangles. Maps of larger areas are plotted at scales of 1: 250 000 and 1: 500 000. The USC & GS
publishes aeronautical and coastline charts. The former are small-scale maps which are primarily used for
those areas of the United States and its territories that have not been mapped on a large scale by the
USGS. The coastline charts, plotted at scales from 1: 10 000 to 1: 80 000 are useful for offshore work.
Other sources of topographic information for the United States include the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, which publishes topographic maps and charts of some rivers and adjacent shores plus the
Great Lakes and their connecting waterways; the U.S. Forest Service, which publishes forest reserve
maps; and the Hydrographic Office of the Department of the Navy, which publishes nautical and
aeronautical charts.
The sources of maps for overseas work are varied. Two excellent sources of general information
are the American Geographic Society maps, which cover a large portion of South and Central America,
and the British Admiralty charts.
71 | P a g e
72 | P a g e
1.2.1 Geologic Maps1

The major source of geologic maps and information within the United States is the USGS, which
has published books, maps, and charts in various forms since 1879. One of the most useful series of these
publications is the "Indexes to Geologic Mapping in the United States." This series comprises a map of
each state on which are shown the areas for which geologic maps have been published. A color code is
used to give the approximate scale of each map. A text on the sheet also gives the source of publication,
scale, date, and author of each geologic map and a complete list of USGS reports on the state. The maps
distributed by the USGS also include a geologic map of the United States at a scale of 1: 2 500 000 and
several other series of maps, the best known and most widely used of which are (1) Folios of the Geologic
Atlas of the United States; (2) Geologic Quadrangle Maps of the United States; and (3) Mineral
Resources Maps and Charts. Each of the folios, which were published until 1945, consisted of a text
describing the geologic history of the area covered and several quadrangle maps showing the topography,
geology, underground structure, and mineral deposits of the area. Since 1945, the folios have been
replaced by individual quadrangle maps. These maps often include structure sections, columnar sections,
and other graphic geologic data, as well as descriptive material. The mineral resources maps include
information on such detailed topics as the sand and gravel deposits of a state, the construction materials of
a state, the geology of limited areas, and the location of possible sources of riprap.
The book publications of the USGS may be divided into two general categories. The first consists of
those books, papers, etc., variously referred to as bulletins, circulars, mineral resources publications,
monographs, and professional papers that are detailed geologic studies of limited scope. The second
category includes the water supply papers, which deal with various topics, among which are included
detailed studies of surface and subsurface water flow in specific areas. These papers often include detailed
geologic descriptions and maps of the area under consideration.
In addition to the above items, the USGS also distributes certain state geologic maps and a quarterly
entitled "Abstract of North American Geology," which contains abstracts of the most significant papers
published within the quarter.
Geologic information is also available from state and local governmental agencies, the Geological
Society of America, and universities. The majority of the states have geologic surveys or an equivalent
agency responsible for the gathering and the dissemination of geologic information. The available data
may take the form of geologic maps, geologic reports, and records of explorations made in conjunction
with state highway construction. State and local authorities also often maintain records of all wells drilled
within their jurisdiction. A list of the names and addresses of state geologists is contained in Hunt (1984),
Appendix B.
The Geological Society of America publishes geologic maps, as well as a monthly journal and
special volumes that treat in detail specific geologic topics on locates. Included among the former are
general geologic maps of North and South America, "The Glacial Map of the United States," and "The
Loessial Deposits or Windblown Soils in the United States." Detailed geologic maps of limited areas are
also often found in the journal articles and special volumes.
The libraries of local colleges and universities frequently contain considerable detailed geologic
information in the form of theses. These libraries are likewise often the source of many out-of-print
geologic publications.
1.3.6 Soil Surveys

The soil surveys conducted by various governmental agencies are also a useful source of information for
the engineer planning a subsurface exploration program. These surveys, which consist of the mapping of
surface and near-surface soils over a large expanse of land, are of two types, agricultural and engineering.
73 | P a g e
Since both types usually cover an entire county, the information contained in them is, of 1 To be updated for
the Caribbean context necessity, generalized. This information, published in the form of text and maps, is
particularly useful for projects such as highways. Agricultural soil surveys in the United States have been
conducted by the Department of Agriculture (USDA) in conjunction with state agencies since the early
1900s. The results of the surveys are presented in the form of reports and maps that commonly, but not
always, cover a complete county. The reports, in general, contain a description of the areal extent,
physiography, relief, drainage patterns, climate, and vegetation, as well as the soil deposits of the area
covered. The soil descriptions are done in accordance with the pedologic method. The maps show the
extent and derivation of the various deposits. During the period over which these reports and maps have
been published, the criteria for their preparation has varied significantly. The earlier reports were directed
entirely toward the use of the soils for agricultural purposes and the accuracy of the mapping varied
significantly. In spite of this, the information that was presented has been utilized successfully for
engineering purposes by some state highway organizations that have correlated the observed behavior of
pavements with the classifications as given in the USDA reports and maps. One of the states that has made
extensive use of correlations of engineering characteristics with the pedologic units is Michigan (1960).
The more recently published reports now contain engineering-oriented sections prepared by the Bureau of
Public Roads in conjunction with the Soil Conservation Service, which is the agency responsible for
conducting the surveys and publishing the reports and maps. In addition, in some states, engineering
supplements to the agricultural survey reports have been prepared by local authorities. These supplements
provide data on the drainage characteristics of the materials and anticipated engineering problems.
Highway Research Board Bulletin 22-R (Committee on Surveying, Mapping, and Classification of Soils,
1957) contains a list of the soil survey reports published to the time of its printing and rates these surveys
on the basis of the adequacy of the soil mapping performed. A current list of published soil surveys may be
obtained from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
A few engineering soil surveys are available. An excellent example is the Engineering Soil
Survey of New Jersey (Rogers, 1950). The survey reports comprise a general volume and an individual
volume for each county in the state. The general volume describes the climate, physiography, geology,
and soils of the state, the mapping and soil-testing techniques used, and the symbolic notation used for the
identification of the various soil types. Each county volume comprises a text and a soils map. Included in
the text are general data on the physiography, surface drainage, and geology of the area covered and
detailed information concerning the major soil formations found in the area. This information includes the
geologic identification and general characteristics of the parent formation; the nature of the underlying
formations; the landform; the types of soils included under the general grouping; the engineering
classification of the material; the drainage characteristics; and a discussion of the engineering aspects of
the material. The soils map that accompanies the report delineates the areal extent of the various materials
by means of symbolic notation. This notation is basically a three-part code system, which by a
combination of letters and numbers designates the type of geologic formation in which the soil occurs,
identifies the soil in accordance with AASHO Designation M 145-49, and indicates the prevailing or
average subsurface drainage conditions.
1.3.6 Aerial Photographs

One of the most useful sources of information the planner of a subsurface exploration program can have at
his disposal is a series of aerial photographs of the site and surrounding vicinity. This is particularly true in
areas where little or no work has previously been done and in the case of projects that have a large areal
extent, such as irrigation developments, or projects that have a large longitudinal extent such as highways.
The use of aerial photographs predates World War II. However, it was the use of such photographs by the
armed forces during the war that gave the impetus to their use for various facets of engineering work in
74 | P a g e
civilian life during the postwar era. Among the major uses for aerial photographs are topographic mapping,
geologic mapping, and soils surveys. A brief discussion of their use for the latter two purposes is given
below. Innumerable technical papers and texts concerning the subject have been
published, among which are American Society of Photogrammetry (1980), Lueder (1959), and Ray
(1960), listed at the end of this chapter. The reader is referred to these and similar publications for
detailed discussions of the subject.
The aerial photographs used in connection with geologic and soils work are almost exclusively
vertical photographs. They may be black-and-white or colored. The black-and-white prints normally used
are 9 inches square, although other sizes are used; color transparencies are generally 4.5- or 9-inches
square. Color photographs are generally preferred because (a) objects are easier to identify when they
appear in their natural color; (b) fine details and small objects can be identified more positively than on
black-and-white photographs at the same scale; and (c) the cause of tonal variations is more readily
established. However, the high cost of color photography has somewhat limited its use, and black-and-
white photographs are still used in most engineering work today.
Aerial photographs are taken from an aircraft flying at a prescribed altitude along pre-established
lines. The altitude from taken is a function of the desired scale of the photographs and the equipment
used. In photo- geologic work, scales normally range between 1:6000 and 1: 40000 depending upon the
degree of accuracy required. The flight lines are so located as to provide for overlapping of photographs
from adjacent lines. The photographs along each flight line also are taken so as to provide overlapping
coverage. The coverage is such that each photograph includes approximately 60 percent of the area
covered by the preceding photograph. This provides the interpreter with pairs of photos- graphs which,
when viewed with the aid of a stereoscope, provide the three-dimensional view of the land surface
essential to proper interpretation. A large portion of the United States has been covered by photography of
this type and some of the photographs are available for purchase from various agencies of the government
and from private firms involved in aerial survey work. A map entitled "Status of Aerial Photography in
the United States," published by the United States Geological Survey, indicates the areas of the United
States that have been mapped by aerial photographs and contains a list of government agencies and
private firms that have photographs for purchase. A similar map entitled "Status of Aerial Mosaics in the
United States" is also available. In addition, records of all reported aerial photographic coverage including
the scales of the photographs and the equipment used are maintained by the USGS Map Information
Office.
In the hands of a well-trained and experienced specialist, aerial photographs can be used to reveal
subsurface conditions with surprising accuracy. Geologic information is obtained from aerial photographs
through a process of deductive and inductive reasoning based upon a thorough understanding of the
general geology of the area in which the project is to be located and an extensive knowledge of geology,
geomorphology, pedology, groundwater hydrology, and soil engineering. The quantity and quality of the
information the interpreter can obtain from any series of photographs depends on several factors, chief
among which are the scale and quality of the photographs, the density of the vegetative cover, the degree
of relief exhibited by the terrain, and the ability and experience of the interpreter. All other conditions
being equal, the maximum amount of information will be obtained when the aerial photographs are used
in conjunction with field and laboratory investigations that can be used for verification and correction of
interpretations. The information that may be obtained from aerial photographs includes, but is not limited
to, the type of bedrock; structural characteristics of the rock such as joint patterns, bedding planes, folds,
and faults; the type and thickness of overburden; surface and subsurface drainage characteristics; the
depth to groundwater; and the relative percentages of sands and gravels.
In the analysis of the photographs, the interpreter relies on the fact that surface features are controlled by
subsurface geologic conditions and the composition of the overburden materials so that, under a given set
of conditions, a classic pattern will evolve. The major features that are utilized are landform, drainage,
erosion, vegetation, and photographic tone. It is important to note that no single one of these features is
75 | P a g e
sufficient in itself. The combined information from each of the features is essential to proper analysis.
The identification of the landform as a dune, terrace deposit, alluvial fan, esker, moraine, or other type of
deposit often permits the type of material to be established within given limits and thus yields an initial
appraisal of the situation. This identification is particularly important in those cases were large areas or
extended lengths are being mapped; in the case of small sites, it is not uncommon to have a single
landform present. Drainage patterns aid in the identification of soil type and in the structural
characteristics of the underlying rock. Soils of high permeability will be well drained as long as
tomograph conditions are conducive to drainage. Under such conditions the drainage channels will
normally be widely spaced, that the drainage pattern will be coarse-textured; in some case may even be
absent. In impervious materials the channels will be close, that is, fine-textured. Large numbers of lakes
or ponds without streams also are indicative of impervious materials. In bedrock areas where the
resistance to erosion is relatively uniform, a dendritic drainage pattern is expected. The presence of trellis,
annular, parallel, and other drainage patterns is usually indicative of structural control of flow and,
therefore, of the presence of folds and faults. Relatively straight channels in bedrock areas may be
indicative of faults or of tilted inter-bedded sedimentary deposits of varying resistance to erosion.
Gully erosion profiles, both transverse and longitudinal, further define the materials. In general,
gullies in granular soils are V-shaped and have steep gradients. Cohesive soils with little or no granular
component have gullies that are characterized by a broadly rounded V-shape and a uniform low gradient.
Gullies in loess and in cohesive soils having a significant number of granular particles are U-shaped and
have low gradients.
Vegetation, although one of the more difficult features to evaluate, is often indicative of
subsurface conditions. Trees growing along the edges of terraces may be indicative of water seeping from
the deposits, and orchards are commonly found in well-drained areas. Also, certain types of vegetation are
in themselves indicative of conditions. For example, willows and hemlocks require substantial amounts of
moisture, whereas poplars and scrub oaks are found in areas of low moisture. Aspen, on the other hand,
thrives in a wide variety of soil types and under a wide variety of soil conditions, thereby lending to the
difficulty of interpretation. The trained specialist will carefully weigh the relationship between the type of
vegetation, the soil type and moisture content, the topography, and other pertinent factors in determining
the significance, if any, of the presence of vegetation.
Insofar as photographic tone is concerned, light tones are generally, but not always, indicative of
well-drained materials, whereas dark tones indicate poorly drained material. However, as in the case of
vegetation, care is required in interpretation since tone is affected by several factors, all of which must be
considered. For example, topographic position may preclude drainage of an otherwise free-draining
material and give it a dark appearance.
1.3.7 Field Reconnaissance

Subsequent to a review of the available data disclosed by the research described above, and prior
to the drilling of any exploratory holes, the proposed site should be thoroughly inspected by a geologist
and/or a soils engineer. The primary objective of the reconnaissance is to obtain as much surface and
subsurface information as possible without drilling exploratory holes or excavating test pits. The types of
information to be obtained include accessibility of the site, topography, soil profile, bedrock lithology and
structure, and surface and subsurface drainage. In determining soil and bedrock information, maximum
use should be made of exposures occurring both naturally and as a result of construction. Riverbanks,
natural escarpments, quarries, and highway and railways cuts are some of the many sources of
information concerning the nature and thickness of soil strata and the bedrock lithology and structure.
They may also reveal, through the presence of seeps or springs, information on groundwater flow in the
area. The geologic t information obtained should be entered on sketch maps.
A second source of information that should not be overlooked is adjacent property owners. In the
76 | P a g e
case of structures urban and suburban areas, adjacent property owners may
be able to provide the results of borings and soil tests performed prior to the design of their structures,
information on the type of foundation used, and records of the performance of the foundation. In the case of
projects located in outlying areas, residents may often provide information on groundwater conditions and
sources of construction materials.
1.3.8 Reconnaissance Stage Explorations

One purpose of the reconnaissance survey and exploration phase is to provide information for the
preparation of a rough estimate of the cost of site development. Depending on the nature and amount of
information obtained through the research portion of this phase, it may be deemed essential to put down a
limited number of borings and/or test pits in order to check the finding§ of the research unless existing
borings or test-pit data are already available for this. These explorations may consist of a few small-
diameter borings or test pits. The explorations may be located to develop geologic profiles or at the
locations of major structures. In this stage, borings that are to penetrate only overburden are seldom larger
than 2.5 inches in diameter; if bedrock is to be cored, the holes preferably should be 4 inches in diameter
in order to permit coring with a NX-size barrel.
1.4 EXPLORATIONS FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGN
1.4.1 Purpose and Scope

The primary objective of these explorations is to obtain sufficient subsurface data to permit the
selection of the types, locations, and principal dimensions of all major structures comprising the proposed
project and the making of a sound estimate of its cost. The preliminary designs based on these
explorations are suitable for economic and technical feasibility reports and project planning reports. The
depth, thickness, and areal extent of all major soil and rock strata that will be affected by the construction
must be established in reasonable detail. For projects where earth and rock construction materials are
required, sources of these materials should be investigated to establish the quantity and quality of the
materials available. Disturbed and undisturbed samples of the foundation and borrow materials must be
obtained for laboratory testing to provide a basic knowledge of the engineering properties of the various
materials. The extent of the program will depend on the nature of both the project and the subsurface
conditions. Since it is not unusual for the exploratory program and the design to proceed concurrently, the
exploration program must be flexible; it is incumbent upon the planner to constantly review the
information obtained so that as the design and explorations proceed problem areas can be defined.
Additional explorations can then be added so that the designer can be provided with adequate information
for a rational design.
If detailed geologic maps are not available from the reconnaissance stage, field mapping is done
to prepare such maps. Geologic sections are prepared also. The maps and sections are adjusted as
necessary as information becomes available from the subsurface exploration program.
1.4.2 Type and Spacing of Explorations

The program for preliminary design may consist of any or all*, of the various types of
explorations described in subsequently paragraphs. Regardless of the type of project for which, the
explorations are to be made, the objectives of this program are. to establish in reasonable detail the
stratigraphy together with a basic knowledge of the engineering properties of the overburden and bedrock
formations that will be affected by or will have an effect upon the new structures, and to locate and
determine the quality and approximate quantity of construction materials within an economical haul
77 | P a g e
distance from the site.

Simply stated, the number and spacing of the explorations should be such as to properly achieve
these objectives at minimum cost. The number and spacing of the explorations should be consistent with
the type and extent of the project and with the nature of the subsurface conditions. Building codes often
stipulate the number of borings required for structures, many times on the basis of area per boring.
Usually, foundation conditions can be adequately investigated using the number of borings required by the
code but the designer should not hesitate to make additional borings in critical areas if it is necessary for
proper design of the structure. The planner of an exploration program should not be reluctant to space
borings closely, to locate them in running water, or to incline them if he deems it essential to the
accomplishment of the objectives of the program.
Rigid rules for the number and spacing of explorations cannot and should not be established. In
general, however, emphasis should be placed on locating borings to develop typical geologic cross
sections; for example, in the case of a river valley, the explorations should be located on lines across the
valley and the spacing of the borings on these lines should be much closer than the spacing of the lines,
since geologic variations will occur in very much shorter distances across the valley than up and down the
valley. Some general guidelines for various types of projects are detailed below.
For localized projects such as office buildings or building complexes that occupy areas of
relatively limited extent, an initial program for a single building might consist of a boring at each corner
of the structure and one in the middle. Where several structures are involved, as in a housing
development, borings might be located and spaced so as to provide geologic sections across the site in
mutually perpendicular directions. In either case, additional borings would be put down as the site
conditions become apparent.
For larger projects of limited extent, such as dam projects, the planner will seek to establish
geologic profiles across the valley at the axis, and at the downstream toe and upstream toe of the dam; at
all major appurtenant structures such as the spillway, diversion tunnels or conduits, outlet works, and
powerhouse; along access roads; and in quarries and borrow areas. Test pits and/or trenches will also be
excavated in the borrow areas to obtain representative samples for testing of compacted specimens.
Profile lines for the dam and appurtenant structures will each contain several borings. It is not uncommon
for rivers to flow along old fault lines or to have old gorges that have been refilled with alluvial material.
Therefore, it is frequently convenient to have some of the borings in the vicinity of the river inclined in
order to facilitate mapping of such fault zones and buried valleys. Explorations along the alignment of
long tunnels will depend to a large extent on the geology of the area. Borings will be located at portal
areas and at points along the alignment to establish the geology.
In the case of quarries and borrow areas, either a series of geologic profiles is established or,
where geologic conditions are uniform, explorations are located at the intersections of grid lines. Grids in
these areas are often initiated at a spacing of 200 to 400 feet depending on the size of the area. Test pits to
obtain samples of proposed borrow materials are located on the basis of the profiles established from
borings or auger holes.
For projects such as highways and railroads which have large longitudinal extent compared to
their width, explorations generally fall into three categories. The first consists of shallow borings along
the alignment. These are generally spaced so as to verify the delineations of large areas of similar
materials along the alignment as determined by aerial photographs and. geologic mapping. The second
category includes borings for major structures such as bridges, retaining walls, and large embankments
and borings in areas of cut slopes to permit the determination of safe slopes. These are generally deeper
and more closely spaced. The initial borings for bridges are generally spaced so that there is a minimum
of one per abutment and one for each pier or for every other pier. Borings for retaining walls and cut
slopes are located to give longitudinal and transverse profiles. The exact spacing will depend on the
variability of the soil profile. The third category of borings involves those required to establish the quality
and quantity of construction material available from quarries and borrow areas. Explorations for these
78 | P a g e
areas should follow the same procedures as for the case of dams described in the preceding paragraph.
1.4.3 Depth of Explorations

Just as rigid rules cannot be established for the spacing of borings, similar types of rules have no place in
determining the depth to which explorations are carried. However, general guidelines are available to the
program planner. Two major factors will control the depth of exploration, namely, the
magnitude and distribution of the load imposed by the structures under consideration and the nature of the
subsurface conditions. In all projects, the borings, as a minimum, must extend to a depth sufficient to
reveal the nature of all materials that could be significantly affected by the loads imposed by the structure
and that, by settlement and/or shear failure, could affect the integrity of the structure. In cases such as the
design of dam projects, where control of seepage must be considered, the exploration, as a minimum,
should be carried to the nearest relatively impermeable stratum beneath the proposed foundation level.
When, based on the above criteria, a boring extends to or into bedrock, it is prudent to carry the boring at
least 10 feet and, at times as much as 15 feet or more beneath the top of apparently sound rock so as to
establish the fact that bedrock rather than boulder has been encountered. Application of these general
criteria to specific projects is outlined in the paragraphs that follow.
For localized structures, such as buildings, it is common practice to carry explorations to a depth
beneath the loaded area of 1.5 to 2.0 times the least dimension of the structure. In the case of a building
founded on spread footings or on a mat foundation, the level of the loaded area is the base of the footings
or mat; for buildings founded on bearing piles or caissons, the level may be taken as the top of the bearing
stratum to which the supporting elements are carried. Contours of normal stresses on horizontal planes
and of maximum shearing stresses show that at a depth equal to 1.5 to 2.0 times the least dimension of the
structure the normal stresses will be approximately 10 percent and the maximum shear stresses
approximately 5 percent of the imposed load. Generally, stresses of this magnitude or less are
insignificant. Taylor (1948) cautions against the blind use of this rule of thumb for establishing the depth
of explorations and cites the possibility of deeply buried strata of soil with poor bearing characteristics
causing excessive settlements even when they are below the recommended depth. Where geologic
conditions are not well established it is always prudent to carry a minimum of one boring into bedrock to
guard against such eventualities. This boring should be performed first and if there is an indication of
deeply buried weak strata sufficient number of the remaining borings should be carried deep enough to
establish the configuration of such strata.
Tunnels and underground installations such as caverns and chambers require explorations to the
elevations of the underground installations. Knowledge of the nature of the material is required with
regard to excavation and support of the underground openings. Often, these explorations are extremely
deep and expensive and only one or two borings can be justified. When feasible, it is better to utilize pilot
bores or audits to establish the conditions.
The depths of explorations in proposed quarries and borrow areas will be controlled by the
anticipated depth and thickness of the material to be excavated and used. The planner must make
maximum use of aerial photographs, geologic reconnaissance, and available-geologic information to
establish the approximate limits of the source. He must first drill a few holes that will verify his
assumptions as to the type of material present and the depth and thickness of the deposit. Only then will
he be able to establish a proper program including the depth of exploration.
The depths of the explorations along the alignment of a highway or railroad will depend on the knowledge
of subsurface conditions as based on geology, soil surveys, and previous explorations, and on the
configuration of the highway or railroad at any given point. In areas of light cut and fill with no special
problems, explorations should extend a minimum of 5 feet below proposed subgrade. However, where deep
cuts are to be made, large embankments or embankments across marshland are to be constructed, or
79 | P a g e
subsurface information indicates the presence of weak layers, the depth will depend primarily on the existing
and proposed topography and the nature of the subsoil. Therefore, no guidelines can be given except that the
borings should be deep enough to provide information on materials that may cause problems with respect to
stability, settlement, and drainage. Borings for structures are carried to depths established on the basis of the
principles outlined for establishing the depths of borings for buildings. Depths of explorations for quarries
and borrow areas would be as described for such areas when used in connection with dams.
1.2.1 Sampling
The majority of the samples taken will be of the representative but disturbed type such as those
obtained by split-barrel samplers. This will permit visual identification and classification of the materials
encountered as well as identification by means of grain size, water content, and Atterberg limit tests. In
order to obtain a basic knowledge of the engineering properties of the materials that will have an effect on
the design, a limited number of undisturbed samples such as those obtained with thin-wall tube samplers
or double-tube core barrel soil samplers, will be required for possible shear, consolidation, and
permeability tests. The number taken should be sufficient to obtain information on the shear strength and
consolidation characteristics of each major stratum.
Sampling within the boreholes may be either continuous or intermittent. In the former case,
samples are obtained throughout the entire length of the hole; in the latter, samples are taken every 1.5 m
and at every change in material. Initially it is preferable to have a few holes with continuous sampling so
that all major strata present may be identified. The horizontal 'and vertical extent of these strata may then
be established by
Intermittent sampling in later borings.
1.4.6 Reporting of Results

The results of the explorations and laboratory testing are usually presented in the form of a
geology and soils report. The report may be in the form of an individual volume, or it may be incorporated
as a chapter or an appendix in an economic and technical feasibility report or in a project planning report.
A discussion of the contents of a soils and geology report is given in the last section of this chapter. An
outline for such a report also is presented.
1.5 EXPLORATIONS FOR DETAILED DESIGN
1.5.1 Type and Number of Explorations

The objective of this phase of explorations is to fill in any gaps in the previous program and to
make such additional explorations as are necessary so that subsurface conditions at each structure are well
defined. When the subsurface information from the two phases is combined, the resulting information
must be adequate for preparation of bidding plans and specifications for construction. In this phase the
precise location of each structure is set, and additional borings are made so that an adequate number of
borings are located at each structure. From the previous program certain problems may have been
disclosed and for these more elaborate exploration methods or field tests or larger-diameter samples may
be required. Otherwise, the type of explorations made in this phase may be very similar to those made in
the previous phase.
1.6 GEOPHYSICAL EXPLORATIONS
1.6.1 Use of Geophysical Methods

80 | P a g e
Two geophysical methods, seismic and electrical resistivity, have proven useful as rapid means of
obtaining subsurface information and as economical supplements to borings in exploratory programs for
civil engineering purposes. Such geophysical explorations supply information for bedrock profiling,
define the limits of granular borrow areas and large organic deposits, and yield a general definition of
subsurface conditions including the depth to groundwater. However, there are numerous limitations to the
information obtained by these methods, and they should not be expected to give reliable or useful results
for all subsurface conditions. To ensure the optimum utilization of such exploration techniques,
individuals experienced in both soils and geophysical theories should be consulted to determine the
applicability of geophysical procedures to the area under investigation; to plan, design, and supervise the
geophysical exploration program; and to interpret the data. All geophysical information should be spot-
checked by borings and/or other direct methods of exploration.
1.6.2 Theory of Seismic Methods

Seismic methods of exploration are based on the fact that shock waves travel at different
velocities through different types of materials. Since the velocity of wave propagation depends on
numerous factors such as density, moisture, texture, void space, and elastic constants, the nature and
stratification of subsurface materials can be determined. However, most subsurface materials are non-
homogeneous and anisotropic, and this makes the analysis of seismic exploration data somewhat
complex.
In seismic explorations, artificial impulses are produced either by the detonation of explosives or
a mechanical blow (usually with a heavy hammer) at ground surface or at shallow depth within a hole.
These artificial shocks generate three types of waves, namely, compression, shear, and surface waves; in
general, only compression (longitudinal) waves are observed. These are classified as direct, reflected, or
refracted waves. Direct waves travel in approximately straight lines from the source of impulse to the
surface. Reflected or refracted waves undergo a change in direction of propagation when they encounter a
boundary separating media of different seismic velocities. Waves that are turned back when they
encounter such a boundary are called reflected waves; those that undergo a change or a bending in the
direction of propagation are refracted. It is mainly refraction and reflection seismic methods that are used
for subsurface profiling in engineering exploration. Of these, the refraction method is most commonly
used for civil engineering purposes, since the reflection methods on land are limited to providing
information on subsurface materials at depths greater than approximately 300 m below ground surface.
In addition to subsurface profiling, seismic methods have also been used to determine engineering
properties of soil and rock. The velocity of compression waves, and sometimes shear waves, determined by
subsurface seismic methods such as up hole, downhole, and cross hole surveys are used to compute in- situ
values of the moduli of rock and soil.
1.6.3 Seismic Refraction Method

Seismic refraction methods have been used to investigate subsurface conditions from ground
surface to depths of approximately 300 m. A typical arrangement of field equipment for the investigation
of a two-layer system is shown in the lower part of Figure 1.1. Point A on this diagram is the source of
the seismic impulse. Points D, through DI 2 represent the locations of the detectors or geophones, who’s
spacing is dependent on the amount of detail required and the depth to the strata being investigated. In
general, the spacing must be such that the length from D, to D2 is three to four times the depth to be
investigated. The geophones are connected by cable to recording devices, which may be truck-mounted or
may be portable units placed at ground surface. A high-speed camera is used to record the time at which
the seismic impulse is generated and the time of arrival of the wave front at each geophone. A continuous
profile along a line may be obtained by moving the geophones along the line, generating a new impulse
from the same source point each time the geophones are moved, and recording, for each shot, the time of
81 | P a g e
initiation of the wave and the "first arrival times."

The data from the film records are plotted in the form of time-distance graphs such as that shown
in the upper part of Figure 1.1. The slopes of this plot represent the velocity of the seismic wave as it
passes through the various subsurface materials present. These velocities are used in standard formulas to
determine the depth to the interface between the layers of material of differing seismic wave velocity.
They are also used to obtain a general idea of the nature of the materials present. Typical seismic wave
velocities for various materials are given in Table 1.1. Detailed investigation procedures for seismic
refraction studies and the formulas used for depth determinations are presented by Jakosky (1950),
Mooney (1977), and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1979).
The formulas used to determine subsurface strata thicknesses from seismic refraction survey
data are based on the following assumptions:
1. Each stratum is homogeneous and isotropic.

2. The boundaries between strata are inclined or horizontal planes.
3. Each stratum is of sufficient thickness to reflect a change in velocity on the time-distance plot.
4. The velocity of wave propagation for each succeeding stratum increases with depth.
Unfortunately, more often than not, the subsurface conditions encountered do not satisfy all of the
above assumptions and it is the effect of the variations from the assumed conditions that must be carefully
evaluated to provide a proper interpretation of seismic data; for example, a stratum that has a thickness
less than one quarter of the depth from the ground surface to the top of the stratum or one in which the
velocity of wave propagation is less than that of an overlying stratum will be "masked," that is, its
presence will not be reflected in the time-distance plot. In addition, the range of the velocity of wave
propagation for a material may overlap that of the material immediately above or below and it may be
difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish between the two strata. There also are some strata in which the
velocity of wave propagation continuously increases with depth and causes difficulty in the determination
of the actual wave velocity. Therefore, borings should always be performed in conjunction with seismic
surveys to corroborate the interpretation of the data and to insure maximum reliability.
In situations where the boundaries between strata are inclined, a single time-distance plot will
indicate only the average thickness of the strata. It is standard practice to eliminate this problem by
"reverse profiling," which consists of obtaining a time-distance plot for shocks initiated at both ends of
the line of geophones.
Modified field techniques also are useful in specific situations such as investigations for buried channels.
Among these techniques is the "fan shooting" method, in which the geophones are located at
approximately the same radial distance from the impulse point. If the time required for a wave to reach
any geophone is significantly different from the measured times for the other geophones, the existence of
a material of different velocity is indicated.
Seismic refraction surveys have been used successfully on numerous engineering projects. They
have proven particularly valuable in the reconnaissance stage, during which they may be used as a rapid,
efficient means to obtain information that often permits the elimination of alternate sites or alignments
without having to perform a large number of borings. Among the most useful information provided is the
depth to bedrock, the thickness and areal extent of gravel borrow areas, the location of the groundwater
table and the susceptibility of materials to excavation by ripping with a tractor. Alternative dam site
locations often may be eliminated in the reconnaissance stage because of a very deep sound rock
foundation. Similarly, the bedrock profile information may indicate an excessive amount of rock
excavation for one highway alignment as compared to another. Seismic methods may also be used to
provide general information during preliminary investigations for bridges, buildings, and other structures.
However, the design of the foundations for such structures requires information regarding particular
physical properties of the materials present that is not obtainable by seismic methods.
82 | P a g e
1.6.4 Seismic Reflection Methods

Continuous seismic profiling, a sonar seismic method based on the principles of reflection, is
used extensively in studies for deep-water projects. The method utilizes sonic waves produced at or near
the water surface to provide a continuous profile of the sea bottom and to map the underlying materials.
Systems referred to as the Sparker, Boomer, and Pinger have been developed for investigations requiring
both shallow and deep penetration of the materials underlying the sea bottom. Detailed descriptions of
these systems are presented in an article by Van Reenan (1964).
Continuous seismic profiling has been used for subsurface investigations for pipeline crossings,
dam sites, bridges, marine structures, and dredging projects.
1.6.5 Electrical Resistivity Method

The electrical resistivity method of subsurface exploration is based on the fact that different
materials offer different resistance to the passage of an electric current. Thus, by the determination of
vertical and lateral variations in this resistance it is possible, within certain limitations, to infer the
stratification and lateral extent of subsurface deposits. In this method, the resistance to passage of the
current is determined by measurement of the specific resistance (resistivity) of the material, which is
defined as the resistance in ohms between opposite faces of a unit cube of the material. The common units
of resistivity measurement used in subsurface exploratory work are the ohm-foot, ohm-centimeter, and
ohmmeter. In soils, the resistivity of the particles is high; similarly, the resistivity of groundwater, if pure,
is high. Therefore, if there is to be a passage of current through a soil mass it will be almost exclusively
through electrolytic action due to the presence of dissolved salts in the groundwater. Consequently, the
resistivity of a soil is primarily dependent on the moisture content and the concentration of these
dissolved salts. It also is influenced to varying degrees by the void ratio, particle size, stratification, and
temperature. In rocks other than mineralized deposits, the resistivity similarly is dependent primarily on
the moisture content and the concentration of dissolved salts in the groundwater. It also is affected by
porosity, dip and strike, soundness, and temperature.
Several methods involving different electrode arrangements have been developed for making
field resistivity measurements. Among these are the Wenner, Schlumberger, and Lee Methods. The major
portion of the civil engineering resistivity surveys performed in the United States have been accomplished
by the Wenner Method, whereas the Schlumberger Method is utilized for most European surveys.
The Wenner arrangement (Fig. 1.2) consists of four equally spaced electrodes driven
approximately 8 inches into the ground. In this method a d.c. or very low frequency a.c. current of known
magnitude is passed between the two outer (current) electrodes, thereby producing within the soil an
electric field, whose pattern is determined by the resistivities of the soils present within the field and the
boundary conditions. The potential drop for the surface current flow line is measured by means of the
inner electrodes and the resistivity is calculated by the formula shown in Figure 1.2. This formula
assumes that the material within the limits of the electric field is homogeneous. If it is not, the value
obtained represents an average resistivity for the material within the shaded zone of Figure 1.2 and is
largely dependent on the resistivities of the materials to a depth equal to the electrode spacing A.
Two types of resistivity surveys are used for subsurface explorations, namely, electric profiling
and electric sounding. The purpose of electric profiling is to provide information concerning lateral
variations in subsurface materials. This is accomplished by maintaining constant electrode spacing as the
electrodes are moved across an area and a resistivity measurement is made for each new location of the
electrode spread. A common practice is to advance the electrode spread a distance equal to the electrode
spacing by moving the rear electrode to the front position after each reading. Data from a series of such
traverses across an area may be presented in the form of a series of contours of equal resistivity. Electric
83 | P a g e
profiling is used to delineate the areal extent of pervious deposits, locate faults, and locate steeply dipping
contacts between materials. The purpose of electric sounding is to provide information on the variation of
subsurface materials with depth. This is accomplished by maintaining the center of the electrode spread at
a given location and taking a series of resistivity readings as the electrode space A of Figure 1.2 is
increased. As the spacing is increased, the depth of material that affects the apparent resistivity increases,
and changes in material are reflected in the resistivity values obtained. Electric sounding is used to
estimate the depth to bedrock, sand and gravel, or water-bearing strata and to estimate the thicknesses of
strata.
Several methods have been developed to interpret the results of electric sounding surveys. These
include the Standard Curve Method, the Inflection Method, and the Moore Method. The Standard Curve
Method is based on a comparison of the field and theoretical curves of resistivity versus electrode
spacing. Wetzel and McMurray (1937) and Roman (1934) have prepared theoretical curves for three- and
two-layer systems, respectively. The curves have been developed for specified ratios of the resistivities of
each layer and specified ratios of the depths to the layers. If the standard and field curves are plotted on
log-log paper and the field curve can be matched to a theoretical curve, the depths of the layers can be
ascertained.
The Inflection Method is based on the assumption that the apparent resistivity is a measure of the average
resistivity to a depth approximately equal to the electrode spacing and thus changes in the slope of the
curve of resistivity versus electrode spacing are indicative of strata boundaries. The peaks and valleys of
such curves for three-layer systems have given approximate depths to the top of the third layer. However,
in general, the depth to the top of the second layer cannot be determined accurately by this method, nor is
the method applicable to cases in which the resistivity continually increases or decreases.
The Moore Method is a modified version of the Inflection Method in which the cumulative
resistivity, that is, the sum of the resistivities for a given electrode spacing and all smaller spacings, is
plotted versus the given spacing. The spacings at the intersections of tangents drawn to intersect near the
points of maximum curvature of the cumulative curve are taken as the depths to strata boundaries.
Success with the resistivity method has been documented for several types of applications. Moore
(1961) reports the use of the resistivity method to obtain rock profiles. Experiments conducted at the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station (1943) indicate good agreement between
borings and the results of resistivity surveys to determine the depths of strata boundaries. These
experiments also indicated that the method could be used to distinguish between pervious alluvium and
clays. Golder and Soderman (1963) describe the successful use of the resistivity method to determine the
thickness of peat, soft clay, and sand over a relatively shallow glacial till, and Liesch (1969) reports its
use to locate water- bearing aquifers. However, although there are many instances of the successful use of
the resistivity method, many factors affect the field measurements, and the data can often be misleading
or difficult to interpret. Among the factors affecting interpretation are the broad range of resistivity values
for a given material and the overlap of ranges of values for different materials, near-surface irregularities,
and stray potentials. These are discussed below.
Szechy (1957) records resistivity values of 102 to 1.7 x 103 ohm-m for dry granular material.
Clays, because of exchangeable ions and double layers even in the partially saturated state, have low
resistivities that range from 3 to 50 ohm-m and sandy clays range from 10 to 100 ohm-m. Rocks, in
general, have high resistivities; however, weathered rocks and soft rocks can have very low resistivities.
Values ranging from 30 to 105 ohm-m have been recorded for sandstone and values as high as 1015 ohm-
m have been measured in porphyry. The values cited indicate the wide range of resistivity that may occur
for a given type of material and the overlap that exists for the ranges of resistivity of different materials.
Both factors make the determination of the exact nature of the materials present and the location of strata
boundaries difficult to determine in many instances. For example, the boundaries between an organic soil
and soft clay, between stiff clay and soft clay shale, or between loose sand and coarse sandstone gravel
usually cannot be detected. Also, the difference in the resistivity of clay above and below the water table
84 | P a g e
may not be reflected in the data because of the double layers of ions and water that exist around clay
particles even above the groundwater table.
The values obtained in resistivity surveys are strongly influenced by near-surface irregularities
since the measurements are made at ground surface. The tests conducted by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Waterways Experiment Station (1943) indicate that surface anomalies or irregularities such as
sloughs and crevasse deposits can affect the overall readings significantly. Other local irregularities such
as ditches, road surfaces, and backfilled depressions may also affect readings. The effect of such
irregularities is sometimes monitored by overlapping profiles or by smoothing the resistivity curves. On
the other hand, resistivity surveys can be used to locate anomalies as shear zones and faults in bedrock
that otherwise has relatively uniform resistivity.
Potentials generated by ore bodies, stray potentials, or tramp materials within the ground also can
affect the electric field created by resistivity survey equipment. Jakosky (1950) describes the use of self-
potential mapping of soils to locate ore bodies beneath the surface and indicates that potentials from such
ore bodies may be as great as 500 to 1000 mV. Also, Golder and Soderman (1963) report a case in which
resistivity measurements indicated the existence of a channel in the bedrock beneath a river. It was found
later that the low resistivity, which had been interpreted as being due to the existence of a channel, was
actually due to the presence of a vertical bed of graywacke containing pyrites. Potentials also may arise
because of buried electric cables, pipeline galvanic action, subway electric systems, and grounded power
currents. These often limit the usefulness of the resistivity method in urban areas.
The above limitations notwithstanding, the electrical resistivity method is a useful exploratory
too] when its limitations are recognized, and the interpretation of the field data is done by experienced
personnel. The method must always be used in conjunction with borings if reliable data are to be
obtained. It is, in general, not as accurate or reliable as the seismic method. However, it is a faster and
more economical means of exploration. The required equipment has a low initial cost and is completely
portable.
1.6.6 Impulse Radar

Probing subsurface conditions by impulse radar (Morey, 1974), referred to as ground penetrating radar
(GPR), electromagnetic subsurface profiling (ESP), and subsurface interface radar (SIR), has been
successfully used in the field of civil engineering purposes since 1970. The technique has been used for
many purposes, among which are the continuous profiling of strata between borings; the profiling of the
surface of bedrock and the groundwater table; the detection of voids in soil and rock; the detection of voids
within and below pavements; the location of utilities and buried objects; the detection of holes in clay
liners; and the location of reinforcing bars in pavements. As with the seismic and electrical resistivity
methods described above, it is necessary to have borings for correlation and calibration when the technique
is used to delineate subsurface conditions.
This method of exploration consists of the radiation of repetitive electromagnetic impulses into
the ground from the surface and the recording of the travel time of the pulses reflected from the ground
surface and from discontinuities in the subsurface profile. The travel time of the reflected pulses are used
to determine the depth to the discontinuities and to delineate these discontinuities. Reflection of the radar
signals is caused by differences in the conductivity of the materials through which the signal passes and
the relative dielectric constants of the. materials penetrated.
The equipment used for ground penetrating radar surveys includes a radar impulse generator.
low- and high-frequency antennas that are used both to transmit the applied radar signal and to receive the
reflected signals; a graphic recorder; a magnetic tape recorder, which is optional; and a converter for d.c.
operation. Antennas with high frequencies, that is, 300 to 900 MHz, produce a greater resolution of detail
over a shallower depth, whereas antennas with low frequencies (80 to 120 MHz) provide greater
85 | P a g e
penetration but with less resolution. Harding Lawson Associates (1986) indicate that objects less than 1
inch in size can be detected to a depth of 2 feet with the 900-MHz antenna and that penetrations up to 60
feet with a resolution of about 2 feet can be obtained with the 80- to 120-MHz antennas.
During operation, all of the equipment for the radar survey except the antenna is usually mounted
in a van or similar vehicle. The sled-mounted antenna is towed over the ground surface behind the vehicle
at speeds that, in general, range from 0.5 to 1 mph. Distances along the alignment can be measured by a
bicycle-wheel type of measuring device mounted to the vehicle bumper. In those cases where the terrain
is not suitable for a vehicle, the antennas can be towed by hand. The remaining equipment, which is
connected to the antenna by a cable several hundred feet in length, is moved from one intermediate point
to another. The intermediate points are located so that when the antenna is towed for the full length of the
cable in both directions from each point, complete coverage of the line is obtained.
As the antenna is towed, either by vehicle or by hand, reflected signals are printed graphically on
the strip-chart recorder, thereby permitting preliminary field evaluation. The use of a magnetic tape
recorder in conjunction with the strip recorder permits later playback and processing of data.
1.7 SOUNDINGS AND PROBINGS
1.7.1 Description of Equipment and Method

The terms sounding and probing are used synonymously to represent that method of exploration
in which a rod is made to penetrate overburden deposits by means of dynamic or static loading and a
continuous or semi-continuous record of the resistance to penetration is obtained. The term jet probing is
often used to refer to that process in which a rod is jetted through the overburden until it can penetrate no
farther and a record is made of the depth of penetration. In the case of a jet probing, the sole purpose is to
attempt to determine the depth to the bedrock surface. However, in the case where a rod is used, while
the determination of the depth to bedrock may be one of the objectives, the penetration resistance is often
used in an attempt to delineate changes in materials, to correlate the resistance to penetration with various
soil properties, and to determine the required penetration of piles to obtain a specific capacity. This
method of exploration has been used extensively in Europe. In particular, it has found wide application in
the Low Countries, where extensive soft deposits overlie the firm bearing strata to which foundations
must be carried. Soundings also are particularly useful in areas such as deltaic plains where the soil
profile is erratic. In such areas they may be used economically to obtain a more detailed delineation of the
soil strata either by measurement of the resistance to penetration between the intermittent samples in
individual borings or by measurement of the resistance throughout the entire profile depth at locations
between widely spaced borings. Figure 1.3a shows the log of a boring in a delta area in which intermittent
samples were taken and a Terzaghi-type penetrometer was used to determine the density of the sands and
the consistency of the clays encountered. Figure 1.3b shows the soil profile along a highway as
determined from 40 similar borings in which a cone penetrometer was used as a supplement to
intermittent sampling.
In its simplest form the apparatus used to make soundings today consists of a conical point attached to a
steel rod, which is commonly referred to as a drive point or cone penetrometer. A schematic drawing of a
version that incorporates a special coupling and an expendable drive point into the basic apparatus is shown
in Figure 1.4a. Soundings performed using this type of penetrometer consist of pushing or driving the point
into the ground and recording the pressure required to achieve a specified penetration or the number of
blows per foot required to drive the point with a specified hammer weight and drop. Drive point
penetrometers, in general, are economical of equipment in that all of the components required except for
special point couplings and drive points are pieces of equipment such as standard hammers, drive heads,
driving guides, pull pieces, and drill rods, which would be available as standard equipment with a test
86 | P a g e
boring rig. The drive points used commonly have a cone angle of 60° and range from 1.3 to 2.75 inches in
diameter. The special couplings for the apparatus shown in Figure 1.4a are available in sizes that permit the
attachment of the point to standard drill rods ranging from E-size to N-size. In practice, the diameter of the
point used is always larger than the rods to which it is attached, so that friction on the sounding rods is
minimized and retrieval of the rods is thereby facilitated. Many other variations of the basic penetrometer
exist. In general, these variations have been developed in an effort to minimize the effect of side friction or
surcharge on the resistances measured in advancing the point. Figures 1.4b and 1.4c illustrate two of the
points in use. Figure 1.4b shows a schematic section of the Dutch cone penetrometer (CPT) in which the
5/8-inch diameter steel rod to which the cone is attached is encased in a 3/4-inch diameter standard steel
pipe. The purpose of the latter is to permit the direct measurement of the point resistance by preventing the
development of friction along the rod should the hole tend to close after the cone has passed. It is also
possible to obtain an estimate of the side friction by measuring the force required to push the pipe sleeve
ahead. This requires the introduction, immediately above the cone, of a short length of sleeve pipe having
the same diameter as the cone while using a smaller-diameter pipe for the remainder of the sleeve pipe. The
cone and sleeve pipe are then advanced alternately and the force required to move each is measured. The
cone used on the Dutch penetrometer generally has a base area of 10 cm2 when it is used in soft soils; a
stronger version of the penetrometer having a cone with a base area of 20 cm2 is used for deep soundings
and dense or stiff materials. The lighter apparatus may be advanced by hand to limited depths; the stronger
apparatus requires some mechanical means for achieving penetration. Standards for this cone penetration
test are given in ASTM D-3441, and guidelines for performance and geotechnical design by Schmertmann
(1978). In the late 1960s, the Dutch cone penetrometer was improved so that the cone resistance and the
friction on the sleeve could be measured electrically and simultaneously, that is, without alternate
movement of the cone and sleeve. This arrangement permitted more accurate determination of the friction
ratio-frictional resistance/cone resistance. Sandy soils have high cone resistance and low friction ratio,
whereas clayey soils have relatively low cone resistance and high friction ratio. For cone resistance and
friction ratio to be representative of a particular stratum, the stratum must have some minimum thickness.
Jamiolkowski et al. (1985) recommends a minimum thickness of about 70 cm for a thin stiff layer
embedded in a soft soil mass, and of 20 to 30 cm for a thin soft layer in a stiff deposit. Schmertmann
(1978) gives correlations of CPT values with relative density and effective friction angle of sands, and with
undrained shear strength for clays. In the 1970s the piezocone (CPTU) was developed. This instrument
measures the piezometric pressure at the cone during penetration. When the standard penetration rate is
about 2 cm/sec, practically undrained penetration conditions obtain in homogeneous cohesive soils, and
almost drained penetration conditions obtain in relatively clean sands (fines content less than 10 percent).
Jamiolkowski et al. (1985) state that the various CPTU pore pressure coefficients that have been developed
are more sensitive than the CPT friction ratio to changes in soil type; that classification charts available in
the literature are specific only for a particular piezoeone geometry and location of piezometer tip; and that
CPTU pore pressures reflect not only the type of soil, but also its stress history (particularly whether it is
normally consolidated or overconsolidated).
Figure 1.4c shows a wash point penetrometer developed by Terzaghi for performing soundings in sand
deposits. The penetrometer consists of a 2.75-inch diameter cone attached to a 1.5-inch diameter double
extra-strong pipe encased in 3-inch diameter extra-strong pipe. The point is provided with
upwarddeflected water passages. In operation the point resistance is measured as the point is advanced
approximately 10 inches into the soil. Liquefaction of the sand is then accomplished by introducing water,
which is pumped into the sounding rod to which the point is attached, flows out of the point through the
upward-deflected jets and returns to the surface through the annular space between the drill rod and casing
as shown in Figure 1.4c. As the liquefaction occurs, the pipe sleeve is advanced to meet the cone; the flow
is then stopped and the procedure is repeated. Alternatively, drilling mud may be used instead of water
and then the casing is not required. The purpose of using the casing or drilling mud is to reduce side
87 | P a g e
friction on the sounding rod. 1.7.2 Use and Limitations The penetrometer is primarily useful in the
mapping of soil strata during the early stages of explorations when the number of borings that can be
drilled is normally limited. The soundings generally have the advantage of speed and low cost when
compared to borings. Some planners of exploratory programs substitute several soundings for a single
boring with the intent of obtaining more information. Others prefer to think of soundings as a tool that can
be used as required to obtain additional information between borings at minimal cost once it has been
ascertained that conditions are erratic. Soundings are particularly useful when performed to obtain
information on stratification that normally would not be available until additional borings were performed
in a later stage of exploration. Hvorslev (1949) has stated that soundings often reveal the presence of
strata that are not recovered or observed in sampling operations. The planner, however, also must be
aware of the limitations as well as the advantages of soundings. One major limitation is that either no
samples or only wash samples are obtained from soundings; therefore, strata cannot be definitely
identified by soundings alone. In addition, the possibility of obtaining misleading results caused by the
presence of gravel, boulder, or wood erratics within the soil strata must be considered. Interpretation of
the results obtained from soundings consequently requires considerable experience, particularly in those
cases in which correlations between the penetration resistance and engineering properties of the soils
penetrated are to be developed.
88 | P a g e

CPP (Intro, Literature, Methodology)

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

CPP (Intro, Literature, Methodology)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CPP (Intro, Literature, Methodology)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

[CAPSTONE PROJECT PLANNING | GROUP 3]

 Introduction to Geotechnical Case Study:

1. The Essence of Geotechnical Engineering:

2. The Urban Canvas:

3. Foundation Design Dilemmas:

4. Navigating Slope Stability:

5. Environmental Dynamics and Geotechnical Engineering:

groundwater levels become integral considerations. Geotechnical engineering is not merely

6. Interaction with Existing Structures:

7. Tools and Techniques:

8. Sustainability and Resilience:

9. The Promise of the Geotechnical Case Study:

2. TYPES OF GEOTECHNICAL STRUCTURES

a. Gravity Retaining Walls:

4. Slope Stability Measures:

 Application: Mitigates erosion and landslide

 Application: Commonly used in road and railway

7. Sheet Piles and Cofferdams:

8. Ground Improvement Techniques:

10. Bridge Foundations:

a. Deep Foundation Systems:

drilled shafts, and footings.

 LITERATURE REVIEW & PROBLEM

1.2 Significance of Shallow Foundations:

II. Literature Review

2.1 Soil Mechanics and Bearing Capacity:

2.2 Types of Shallow Foundations:

2.3 Foundation Settlement:

2.4 Site-Specific Considerations:

III. Problem Identification

3.1 Challenges in Shallow Foundation Design:

capacity, differential settlement, and the influence of adjacent structures.

3.2 Urban Construction and Limited Space:

3.3 Expansive Soils and Soil-Structure Interaction:

4.1 Summary of Literature Review:

4.2 Identified Gaps and Research Opportunities:

2. Literature Review & Problem Identification for Deep Foundations

1.2 Significance of Deep Foundations:

II. Literature Review

2.1 Types of Deep Foundations:

2.2 Soil-Structure Interaction:

2.3 Load-Bearing Capacity and Settlement:

2.4 Design Considerations:

III. Problem Identification

3.1 Challenges in Deep Foundation Design:

3.2 Construction Challenges:

3.3 Monitoring and Maintenance:

4.1 Summary of Literature Review:

4.2 Identified Gaps and Research Opportunities:

3. Literature Review & Problem Identification for Retaining Walls

1.2 Significance of Retaining Walls:

II. Literature Review

2.1 Types of Retaining Walls:

2.2 Soil Mechanics and Slope Stability:

2.3 Construction Materials and Techniques:

2.4 Drainage Considerations:

III. Problem Identification