Activity Journal Mobile Blood Donation Advocacy 1

Republic of the Philippines
CEBUTECHNOLOGICAL U NIVERSITY
MAIN CAMPUS
Website: http://www.ctu.edu.ph email address: [email protected]
OFFICE OF NATIONAL SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAM
ACTIVITY JOURNAL
VSMMC – Mobile Blood Donation
Topic / Title of the Activity
Name: Dave Christopher E. Kaquilala Date: Nov 2, 2023
Course-Major, Yr. & Sec.: BSMx 1-A MISCode: NS53
1. RA 7719 is also known as: 4. Infer the phrase “SAFE BLOOD FOR ALL
and “QUALITY BLOOD FOR ALL”.
The phrases “SAFE BLOOD FOR ALL” and “QUALITY
BLOOD FOR ALL” infer a commitment to ensuring
that everyone has access to blood that is both safe
and of high quality:
1. SAFE BLOOD FOR ALL:This phrase
emphasizes the importance of making sure
that the blood supply is free from
contaminants, diseases, or any factors that

2. What are the BASIC QUALIFICATIONS of a
Blood Donor? could harm recipients. It reflects the
commitment to maintain high safety
standards in blood donation, processing, and
transfusion to protect the health and
well-being of those in need.
2. QUALITY BLOOD FOR ALL:This phrase goes
beyond safety and highlights the need for
blood to meet high-quality standards. It
implies that not only should blood be free

MAIN CAMPUS

from harm, but it should also be effective in
addressing medical conditions. Quality blood
encompasses factors like appropriate
storage, testing, and handling to ensure that it
serves its intended purpose effectively.
Together, these phrases convey a commitment to
providing accessible, safe, and high-quality blood to
all individuals who require transfusions, regardless of
their medical conditions or circumstances. The goal
is to guarantee that blood is a reliable and effective
resource in medical treatments and emergencies.
5. Is it morally acceptable to sell anybody parts

including blood for health reasons? Why?
As a college student, I recognize that the question of

whether it is morally acceptable to sell body parts,
including blood, for health reasons is a complex and
ethically debated issue. Here are some
considerations based on common ethical arguments:
Arguments in Favor of Selling Body Parts:
Autonomy and Personal Choice: Many people argue

that individuals should have the autonomy to make
decisions about their own bodies, including selling
body parts, provided they are well-informed and
voluntarily consent. This perspective aligns with the
principle of individual freedom and choice.
1. Incentives for Donation: Offering financial

incentives for donating blood or organs could
potentially increase the supply of these
life-saving resources, helping address
MAIN CAMPUS

shortages and saving lives.
2. Economic Benefits: In some cases,

individuals may face financial hardships, and
selling body parts can provide much-needed
income to support themselves and their
families.
Arguments Against Selling Body Parts:
1. Exploitation and Vulnerability: Critics argue

that permitting the sale of body parts may
exploit vulnerable individuals, particularly
those facing economic challenges. Financial
desperation might lead people to make
decisions that aren’t in their long-term best
interests.
2. Commodification of the Body:Selling body

parts raises concerns about reducing the
human body to a commodity, potentially
undermining the dignity and intrinsic value of
human life.
3. Coercion and Informed Consent: There’s a

risk that individuals could be coerced or
3. Give only 4 misconceptions in Blood Donation unduly influenced to sell body parts,
that will hinder some to volunteer. especially when they are in dire financial
need. This raises ethical questions about the
validity of their consent.
1. Fear of Pain: Some people believe that donating
4. Quality and Safety:Introducing a profit motive
blood is a painful process. While there may be a may compromise the quality and safety of
body parts, as individuals or organizations
slight pinch when the needle is inserted, the may prioritize financial gain over ethical and
medical standards.
discomfort is usually minimal and short-lived.
Many donors report little to no pain during the In my opinion, there are valid arguments on both
sides, and the moral acceptability of selling body
process. parts for health reasons should be carefully
considered. Ensuring that proper safeguards,
regulations, and ethical standards are in place is
crucial to protecting individuals’ well-being and
2. Fear of Needles:A significant number of dignity. It’s a complex issue that requires a balanced
approach, respecting individual autonomy while
MAIN CAMPUS

individuals have a fear of needles, which can safeguarding against potential exploitation and harm.
prevent them from donating blood. It's essential to
note that the needle used for blood donation is
relatively small, and the procedure is quick. 6. This coming Blood Letting, I will…
Donate
3.Misconceptions about Health Risks: Some Not Donate as of now.✓
individuals worry that donating blood can lead to Give reason why you will donate or why you will not
donate.
health problems or that they might contract I will not donate due to this reason:
It’s essential for college students to consider their
diseases through the process. In reality, blood own health and eligibility before donating blood.
Blood donation centers have specific eligibility criteria
donation is a safe and sterile procedure, and in place to ensure both the safety of the donor and
the recipient. If there are any concerns or questions
donors do not incur health risks. about eligibility, it’s recommended to consult with
healthcare professionals or the blood donation center
for guidance. Donating blood should always be a
voluntary and safe choice. An by that it should be
4. Belief in Insufficient Blood: Some people think voluntary act and in my case no due to being a part
of a program named ROTC.
that their donation won't make a significant
difference or that there's already enough blood
available. In reality, blood is always in demand, and
every donation can save lives.
Addressing these misconceptions through
education and providing a supportive and
reassuring environment at blood donation centers
can encourage more individuals to volunteer and
help save lives through blood donation.

MAIN CAMPUS
Ssubmitted by Dave Christopher E. Kaquilala

Submitted to Rhea Rica Bantigue Tura ___
Instructor
MAIN CAMPUS

Activity Journal Mobile Blood Donation Advocacy 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Activity Journal Mobile Blood Donation Advocacy 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Activity Journal Mobile Blood Donation Advocacy 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

OFFICE OF NATIONAL SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAM

The phrases “SAFE BLOOD FOR ALL” and “QUALITY

BLOOD FOR ALL” infer a commitment to ensuring

that everyone has access to blood that is both safe

and of high quality:

1. SAFE BLOOD FOR ALL:This phrase

emphasizes the importance of making sure

that the blood supply is free from

contaminants, diseases, or any factors that

commitment to maintain high safety

standards in blood donation, processing, and

transfusion to protect the health and

well-being of those in need.

2. QUALITY BLOOD FOR ALL:This phrase goes

beyond safety and highlights the need for

blood to meet high-quality standards. It

implies that not only should blood be free

OFFICE OF NATIONAL SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAM

addressing medical conditions. Quality blood

encompasses factors like appropriate

storage, testing, and handling to ensure that it

serves its intended purpose effectively.

Together, these phrases convey a commitment to

providing accessible, safe, and high-quality blood to

all individuals who require transfusions, regardless of

their medical conditions or circumstances. The goal

is to guarantee that blood is a reliable and effective

resource in medical treatments and emergencies.

5. Is it morally acceptable to sell anybody parts

As a college student, I recognize that the question of

Arguments in Favor of Selling Body Parts:

Autonomy and Personal Choice: Many people argue

1. Incentives for Donation: Offering financial

OFFICE OF NATIONAL SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAM

2. Economic Benefits: In some cases,

Arguments Against Selling Body Parts:

1. Exploitation and Vulnerability: Critics argue

2. Commodification of the Body:Selling body

3. Coercion and Informed Consent: There’s a

OFFICE OF NATIONAL SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAM

prevent them from donating blood. It's essential to

note that the needle used for blood donation is

3.Misconceptions about Health Risks: Some Not Donate as of now.✓

difference or that there's already enough blood

available. In reality, blood is always in demand, and

every donation can save lives.

Addressing these misconceptions through

education and providing a supportive and

reassuring environment at blood donation centers

can encourage more individuals to volunteer and

help save lives through blood donation.

OFFICE OF NATIONAL SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAM

Ssubmitted by Dave Christopher E. Kaquilala

OFFICE OF NATIONAL SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAM

You might also like