CMP, Bikaner (Analysis)

Regional Connectivity
LEGEND NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST
Rajasthan District Jaisalmer

Ganganagar Jodhpur and
Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan
International airport
Domestic Airports ▪ There is one existing expressway which is connecting

Railways Delhi to Ahmedabad.
Existing Expressway
▪ The Proposed Amritsar Jamnagar Expressway will
National Highway
enhance the connectivity of Bikaner.
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
ANALYSIS
Jodhpur 251
Railway Jaipur 350
Ratangarh 134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27
Total National Highways Passing in 20

Rajasthan
-
Total State Highways Passing in 47
Rajasthan
Bikaner District
Total State Highways Passing in Bikaner 1

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043 Regional connectivity and Presented By-
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Vamshi Banoth
Linkages SPA/NS/2022/755
Master in Transport Planning, 2nd Semester

Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan

Existing Expressway
National Highway
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
1. INTRODUCTION
Jodhpur 251
Railway Jaipur 350
Ratangarh 134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27

Rajasthan
-
Rajasthan
Bikaner District

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1
AIM, OBJECTIVE, SCOPE AND LIMITATION
AIM OBJECTIVES SCOPE
1.To understand the existing transport network, traffic characteristics, travel patterns and transport systems
of Bikaner and determine issues and potentials
To provide improved mobility for the people of
2.To develop travel demand model using 4 step transport modelling process.
Bikaner with safe, secure, efficient, reliable transport The study includes understanding present travel
3.To estimate Future travel demand through Population, employment and External Traffic projection for
system emphasizing the pre-eminence of public characteristic, forecast of travel demand the city and
horizon year 2043 and further development of Scenarios.
transport, non-motorized transport, & integrating the providing suitable proposals.
4.To evaluate the scenarios based on parameters.
land use with transport networks.
5.To prepare a Transportation Plan for Bikaner by evolving balanced land-use transport framework for
future growth.
STAGE 1: BACKGROUND STUDY

LITERATURE REVIEW STUDY AREA CHARACTERISTICS
CASE STUDIES AS PER MoUHA TAZ defined as per External TAZ defined as per
Review of Toolkit for Location & Planning Horizon Delineation of Study area
• Hyderabad • Bangalore • Nagpur 1.Population 1.Road Network and Hierarchy
Preparation of Comprehensive (Regional Setting and boundary as per Municipal
• Lucknow • Vishakhapatnam 2.Area 2.Administrative and physical
Mobility Plan Indian Connectivity boundary and its outgrowths
• Kochi • Guwahati 3.Landuse Boundaries
STAGE 2: DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
SECONDARY DATA
Indian Railways - Land use - RSRTC - Vehicular Growth Data -
Station footfall, Boarding and Alighting To compute the spatial growth of the Route data, Number of Vehicles & GDDP and GSDP
passengers , No. Of commercial Staff , basic city in a particular direction. One month financial Estimation of the Growth of the of past 10 year
PRIMARY DATA fare Structure. Transport percentage. performance. road Network.
NETWORK CH. TRAF. CH. TRAVEL CHARECTERISTICS PARKING TERMINAL
IPT
Classifies Traffic OD survey PT NMT and
Road Speed 1. IPT OD Survey
SURVEY
Vol. Count Land use and 1. Passenger 1.PT OD Pedestrian

Inventory & And Household 2. IPT user 1. On Street 1. Passenger Terminal -
& Establishment OD Survey Survey 1 .Ped. Count 2. Goods Terminal
Intersection Delay survey survey 2. Off Street Road & Rail
Turning Moment survey 2. Goods OD 2.PT user survey
Inventory Survey 3. IPT Operator
Count [TMC] Survey survey. 2. Ped. User Survey
Survey
Total & peak hour

I-E, E-I, E-E
ROW, traffic, Demographic, NMT Existing
Hourly Traffic Traffic %
Hierarchy, Journey Socio scenario analysis,
Volume & Share,
Cross Speed, Economics, Land use Route coverage Network Total In-Out-Bound of
ANALYSIS
Composition, Commodity Passenger demand

sectional Delay Vehicle Built-up Service coverage Coverage, Parking demand freight,
Directional Split, Movement and fleet size,
Elements, time, Intersection Ownership, Area of diff. Accessibility level HH Survey and Supply Terminal capacity,
Pattern, Terminal capacity
facilities, Running turning Trip establishment Access Trip Length Analysis, Terminal layout
Trip Length
Transport speed movement count Characteristic NMT share
Frequency
Infrastructure and capacity, s analysis
Traffic estimation. Distribution
Volume/Capacity
Base Network for ratio of Cordon I-I trips, I. Fleet characteristics,
External Traffic Passenger flow
Modelling Points and PCTR, II. Land use wise route and Passenger flow pattern
Trip Ends, ATL, Volume, pattern
I. Network Speed Midblock, TLFD, network coverage, TLFD, ATL; Mode distribution
OUTPUT
Attraction Rate 24 hr OD matrix for Accumulation, Mode distribution

II. Network Travel Time Intersection Lane Trip Ends III. Access dispersal modes, trip (Access & egress)
passenger trip Cycle & Walk, Turnover, (Access & egress)
III. Link wise capacities. wise Level of Sample lengths; Trip length freq.
Attraction Ends Matrix, Identification of Index, Trip length freq.
IV. Traffic Counts for Service, Matrix, IV. TAZ wise PTAL; unconnected, distribution (Access &
Emissions, 24 hr goods potential areas. Load, distribution (Access &
Midblock and Expanded inaccessible area identification, Egress)
Delay, trip matrix. Egress)
screen line for validation. Matrix PT supply deficit.
Queue Length.
STAGE 3: TRAVEL DEMAND MODELLING

BASE YEAR MODELLING ANALYSIS
Trip Generation Equation
(Equation generated by regressing population of TAZ with Trip Attraction Equation
the number of trips generated) (Total attractions calculated by multiplying employees and visitors
rate with total built-up area)
TRIP GENERATION
Trip Ends,
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
TLFD (from HH), Distance Skim Matrix
MODEL CALIBRATION
Household Mode Share MODAL SPLIT Generation of Utility Equation (by using the Parameter Travel Time, Travel cost)
Occupancy And PCU Factor TRIP ASSIGNMENT
Mode wise Vehicle Trip Matrices Generated and converted to PCU
Screen Line Volume Counts MODEL VALIDATION
STAGE 4: PROJECTIONS
POPULATION PROJECTION EXTERNAL TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS

By calculating achievable FAR in 2043 GDDP And vehicular registration data
STAGE 5: VISION AND SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT
SCENARIO : 1 LOW GROWTH SCENARIO : 2 TREND BASED
Trip Generation Equation Trip Attraction Equation Trip Generation Equation Trip Attraction Equation
(Equation generated by regressing (Assuming max. FAR achieved by 2043 for (Equation generated by regressing (Assuming max. FAR achieved by 2043 for
population of TAZ with the number of TRIP DISTRIBUTION establishments, final built-up area calculate population of TAZ with the number TRIP DISTRIBUTION establishments, final built-up area calculate
trips generated) multiplied by rates calculated in base year) of trips generated) multiplied by rates calculated in base year)
MODAL SPLIT MODAL SPLIT
TRIP ASSIGNMENT TRIP ASSIGNMENT
STAGE 6: HORIZON YEAR MODELLING AND FORECASTING
PROPOSALS AND EVALUATION OF SCENARIOS
Comparison of the Scenarios
Vehicle Kilometer Traveled Vehicle Hour Traveled Passenger Kilometer Traveled Emission
Selection Of The Final Scenario

STAGE 7: PROPOSALS
NETWORK CH. TRAFIC CHARACTERISTICS PT IPT NMT PASSENGER TERMINAL GOODS TERMINAL
Short term proposals -Road Signages Intersection Improvement (Signals, Route extension, New route identification, New route identification (cycle + pedestrian path), i. Strengthening or Improving directional Directional Terminals,
and traffic calming measures Conceptual Geometric Design), Bypass Fleet size augmentation, PT system Existing road cross section improved, Public bike terminals. Bypass
Long term proposal-Lane addition (Inner Ring Road and Outer Ring Road) upgradation, IPT to provide as feeder to PT sharing system proposal, Policy building ii. Integrated services for bus and rail terminal.
Presented By-
1.1
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043
Gauri
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Aim, Objectives And Scope Swapnil Mishra
Master in Transport Planning, 2nd Semester Rashi Sharma
INTRODUCTION TO STUDY AREA
Location Bikaner is a city in the northwest of the state of Rajasthan, India. It is located 330
kilometres (205 mi) northwest of the state capital, Jaipur. Bikaner city is the
administrative headquarters of Bikaner District and Bikaner division.
Formerly the capital of the princely state of Bikaner, the city was founded by Rao Bika in
1488 CE. The Ganges Canal, completed in 1928, and the Indira Gandhi Canal,
completed in 1987, facilitated its development.
BIKANER DISTRICT Locational Attribute 4th largest city in Rajasthan

State = 6.8 Cr (2011)
Population District = 23.63 Lakhs (2011)
City = 6.44 Lakh (2011)
District = 30,247 sqkm
Area
City = 176.15 sqkm
Ganganagar, Hanumangarh, Churu, Nagaur, Jodhpur,
BIKANER CITY Surrounding Districts
Jaisalmer
Administrative Limit
Total study area 459.24 sqkm.
Municipal Boundary Area 176.15 sqkm.
Villages Area 283.09 sqkm.
Population of study area 6.69 Lakhs (2011)
Wards 60
Villages 14
Internal TAZs 74
External TAZs 20
Total TAZs 94
Connectivity
- Roadway
Public Transit RSRTC (Intercity)
National Highways NH – 11 and NH 62
Railways
Bikaner railway station is a major railway junction in the North Western Railway
zone of Indian Railways and is located in the centre of the city.
Airways
Bikaner has Domestic Civil Airport Nal Airport which is located 15 km west of the city.
Regular flights to Jaipur JAI and Delhi DEL commenced in 2017-18 under UDAN scheme,
Presented By-
1.2
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043 INTRODUCTION TO Gauri
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi
STUDY AREA Swapnil
Master in Transport Planning, 2nd Semester Rashi

Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan

Existing Expressway
National Highway
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
2. NETWORK CHARACTERISITICS Railway

Jodhpur
Jaipur
Ratangarh
251
350
134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27

Rajasthan
-
Rajasthan
Bikaner District

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1

Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan

Existing Expressway
National Highway
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
Jodhpur 251
Railway Jaipur 350
Ratangarh 134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27

Rajasthan
-
Rajasthan
Bikaner District

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1
Settlement Hierarchy(2023)
Legend TYPE POPULATION
Major Roads Class –I 100,000 and above
300 km
Class –II 50,000 to 99,999
200 km
Class –III 20,000 to 49,999
100 km
State Boundary Class –IV 10,000 to 19,999
Legend
Settlement Hirarchy Class –V 5,000 to 9,999
< 1L
<1L Class -VI less than 5,000
1L 1L-
- 2L2L City Population Distance
Lunkaransar 22,931 74.5
2L 2L
- 5L- 5L Suratgarh 70,536 174
Ganganagar 2,24,532 242
Churu 1,20,157 203
5L 5L
- 10L
- 10L
Fatehpur 22,812 171
Ratangarh 71,124 264
Rajgarh 59,193 233
> 10L
> 10L Sikar 2,37,532 218
Kilometers
Chomu 64,417 302
0 25 50 100 150 200
Phalodi 49,766 161
Pokhran 28,457 224
Jaisalmer 6,69,919 330
Balotra 74,496 332
Jaipur 34,71,847 335
Pali 2,29,956 316
Jodhpur 10,33,756 251
Mathnia 14,939 199
Bilara 39,590 251
Sojat 43,023 288
Bewar 23,729 283
Nokha 62,699 62.2
Nagaur 1,10,797 188
Merta 40,221 205
-
Kishangarh 1,54,886 289
Hanumangarh 1,50,958 244
Jhunjhunu 1,18,473 219
Kotputli 49,202 350
Behror 29,531 342
Bhopalgrah 19,322 184
Piparcity 36,816 217
Bidasar 35,683 118
Didwana 53,749 177
Nohar 49,835 231
Bhadra 40,662 259
2.2
Connectivity Index(2023)
CIRCUITIVITY CIRCUITRY
Legend Legend
(
! Bikaner (
! Bikaner
Major Roads Major Roads
Circutivity Index Circutry Index
< 1.05 < 0.13
1.05 - 1.31 0.13 - 0.24
> 1.31 > 0.24

Kilometers
Kilometers 0 25 50 100 150 200
0 25 50 100 150 200
▪ Circuitivity is the ratio of actual and straight-line distances. It is a ▪ Circuitry represents the ratio of difference between actual and
measure of determining the directness of a route. straight-line distances to the straight-line distances . It is a measure of
route efficiency, in that straighter routes are more efficient. Ranges
▪ Lower is better. from 0 to 1
-
▪ INFERENCES: ▪ Lower is better.
• Cities on the north- Eastern side have more straight roads, ▪ INFERENCES:
therefore the travel distance is less. • Cities on the South Eastern sides are more route efficient as
• Cities on the Partly Western and South Eastern sides have less compared to north side.
straight roads, therefore the travel distance is More.
2.3
TRAVEL TIME INDEX GRAPH INDEX
Legend
Legend
(
! Bikaner
Major Roads
Legend Nodes
Time Travel Index
Major Roads
< 1.06
Edges
< 1.2
1.06-1.21
1.2 - 1.25
> 1.21
> 1.25
Kilometers
0 25 50 100 150 200
Kilometers
0 25 50 100 150 200
▪ Travel Time Index represents the average additional time required for a trip during ▪ Beta index: The simplest measure of the degree of connectivity of a graph is
peak times in comparison with that trip duration in no-traffic condition. given by the Beta index (β). It measures the density of connections.
▪ Lower is better. ▪ The beta index suggests that a complex network have good connectivity.
▪ INFERENCES: -
e = Edges
• Jhunjhunu, Nokha, Hanumangarh, Nohar, Merta, Bhopalgrah ,Sojat, Kekri v = Nodes
Nagaur and Makrana have similar travel time in both peak and off peak hour.
• Jaipur, Ganganagar, Balotra, Suratgarh and Bewar have moderately more ▪ 45 cities as Nodes (v) and 279 links as Edges (e) have been considered .
travel time in peak hour.
▪ Therefore Beta Index = 6.2
• Cities like Jaisalmer, Jodhpur, Fatehpur, Rajgarh and Pali have 1.5 times more
travel time during peak hours.
2.4
SHIMBEL INDEX SHIMBEL INDEX &Distance
Legend Legend
Nodes Nodes
100 km 100 km
Edges Edges
Kilometers
Kilometers 0 25 50 100 150 200
0 25 50 100 150 200
State Boundary State Boundary
< 1.5 <0.5
1.5-2.0 0.5-1.0
2.0-2.5 1.0-1.5
2.5-3.0 1.5-2.0
3.0-3.5 2.0-2.5
3.5-4.0 2.5-3.0
4.0-4.5 3.0-3.5
4.5-5.0 3.5-4.0
5.0-5.5 4.0-4.5
5.5-6.0 4.5-5.0
6.0-6.5 5.0-5.5
>6.5 >5.5
METHODOLOGY METHODOLOGY
Identification of Average distance

Identification of Shortest Routes
direct routes Connectivity Shimbel from settlements
Major cities between the Shimbel = *
(Nodes) (Links) cities Accessibility Matrix Index Accessibility -Matrix Maximum avg.
distance
Shimbel
IDW Analysis
Accessibility Matrix IDW Analysis
▪ INFERENCES: ▪ INFERENCES:
▪ Bikaner, Lunkaransar, Jodhpur, Hanumangarh and Chomu have higher ▪ As the Shimbel index and distance component are introduced simtaneously
accessibility as per Shimbel matrix. their no much difference in this.
2.5
ACCESSIBILITY OF REGION(2023)
BASED ON DEMOGRAPHIC GRAVITATION BY STEWART BASED ON TRAVEL TIME INDEX BY INGRAM
Legend Legend
(
! Bikaner !
( Bikaner
Major Roads Major Roads
Stewart Ingram
< 1.5 < 30
1.5-3.5 30-60
> 60
> 3.5
Kilometers
Kilometers 0 25 50 100 150 200
0 25 50 100 150 200
▪ The concept states that the possibility of having contact with a group of people is • The concept uses travel time to represent the measure of accessibility between
directly proportional to the size of the group ( activity level ) and inversely two settlements.
proportional to the distance or separation from that group.
𝟐 A = Accessibility of -
settlement i with respect to
▪ Higher is better Aij = Accessibility of settlement i with respect to 𝑫 𝒊𝒋 ij
𝑨 = 𝟏𝟎𝟎 ∗ 𝒆
− 𝑽
settlement j
𝐏𝐣 settlement j 𝒊𝒋
𝐀𝐢𝐣 = Dij = Minimum Distance between settlements i and
𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎 ∗ 𝐓𝐢𝐣 Pj = Population of settlement j j.
Tij = Travel time between settlements i and j(Off- • Higher is better
▪ INFERENCES: V = Average squared distance between all
Peak).
Settlements.
• Jaipur has higher possibility of interaction with Bikaner. ▪ INFERENCES:
• Jaisalmer, Jodhpur, Pokhran, Churu Sikar and Suratgarh has moderate
interaction with Bikaner. • Cities Lunkaransar, Nokha and Didwana has better accessibility.
• Cities on the South-eastern side have moderate possibility of interaction with • Cities with more distance has inferior accessibility.
Bikaner.
2.6
SURVEY ROUTES
E
KEY MAP
Total Network Covered =

58 KM
C Total Run = 164.65 km
B TIME PERIODS:
LEGEND
A (Morning Off Peak
G (7:00 AM – 09:00 AM) +
Morning Peak
F (09:00 AM – 12:00 PM +
H
Evening Peak
(04:00 PM – 07:00 PM)
ROUTE PTS. CODING Morning Off Peak Hr. Morning Peak Hr Evening Peak Hr Road Typology
Route 1 (E – W) Dist. - 17.5 KM Dist. - 17.8 Dist. - 17.6
A-B Arterial – 100%
Jaipur to Jaisalmer Time - 23:57 Time - 26:09 Time - 26:43
Route 2 (NW - SW) Dist. – 16.8 Dist. – 16.6 Dist. – 16.7 Arterial – 69.94%, Sub-arterial – 20.54% ,
C-D
Anoopgarh to Nagaur Time – 26:30 Time – 31:48 Time – 33.4 Collector – 8.37%, Local - 1.41%
Route 3 (NE – SE) Dist. – 15.1 Dist. – 16.4 Dist. – 16.5 Arterial – 20.55%, Sub-arterial – 31.83% ,
E-F
Ganganagar to Napasar Time – 21:40 Time – 31:48 Time – 29:14 Collector – 47.62%
Route 4 Dist. – 7.15 Dist. – 7.20 Dist. – 7.2
G-H Arterial – 100%
Jaipur Rd to Nagaur Time – 10:01 Time – 13:05 Time – 12:08

2.11
Presented By-
NETWORK PERFORMANCE
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Rashi Sharma
AND CONGESTION TP/745
PEAK-HOUR V/S OFF-PEAK HOUR SPEED
PEAK HOUR JOURNEY SPEED OFF-PEAK HOUR JOURNEY SPEED
Speed (km/hr)
Speed (km/hr)
Peak Hr Speed Share Off-Peak Hr Speed Share Avg. speed during Peak Periods (Zone-wise)
Speed Road Length Speed Road Length Off-peak Hr Peak Hr Speed
Zone % diff.
(km/hr) Share (%) (km/hr) Share (%) Speed (km/hr) (km/hr)
0.12 Zone 1: Core City (9.7 sqkm.) 23.35 15.91 46.7%
Less than 10 Less than 10 0.00
Zone 2: Middle City (62.0 sqkm.) 27.29 20.46 33.38%
10 - 20 49.67 10 - 20 14.85
Zone 3 : City Outskirts (387.5 sqkm) 34.01 26.90 26.43%
20 - 30 17.29 20 - 30 35.80 CITY SPEED 29.32 22.07
30 - 40 20.21 30 - 40 20.36
40 - 50 6.96 40 - 50 11.71 Network Performance Comparison
City Avg. City Speed (km/hr) Avg. Core area speed (km/hr)
More than 50 5.76 More than 50 17.28
Bikaner 22.07 15.91
• In peak hour, 50.61% of the surveyed road length has Jodhpur - 13.00 (22%)
speed in the range of 10-20 kmph. Hubli-Dharwad 27.85 (26.18%) 22.00 (38.27%)
Solapur 30.00 (35.93%) -
• In case of off-peak hour, 34.13% of road length has speed
INFERENCES
in the range of 20-30 kmph, followed by 20.08% road length
• Core city (CBD) area exhibits the character of lowest speed in the city.
having speed in the range of 30-40 kmph.
• The highest speed observed in on the outskirts and on National Highways.
• PEAK HR: 11:00 AM – 12:00 PM and OFF-PEAK HR: 07:00 AM – 08:00 AM

2.12
Presented By-
NETWORK PERFORMANCE
JOURNEY VS RUNNING SPEED
Route 1: (E – W) Jaipur to Jaisalmer (B-A)
B
KEY MAP
Average Journey Speed Average RunningSpeed
70 A
60
Average Speed (km/h)
50
40
30 Avg. Speed
20
: 40.15 km/h
10
E OBSERVATIONS:
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Delay is witnessed only in
Distance (km) C Route 1 and 3, during morning
Land-use
peak hours, with 35 seconds LEGEND
delay in Route 1 (A-B) due to
Route 2 : (NW - SW) Anoopgarh to Nagaur (C-D) signal and 48 seconds and 4
90
Average Journey Speed Average Running Speed minutes delay in Route 3 (E-F)
80 due to congestion and
Average Speed
70 construction respectively.
60
Delay is only witnessed in city
(km/h)
50 Avg. Speed
40 : 31.65 km/h core.
30
20
10 INFERENCES
0 Higher speeds are observed
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Distance (km)
in the outskirts area with minor
Land-use
fluctuations.
Free flow conditions are
observed in the outskirts.
Route 3: (NE – SE) Ganganagar to Napasar (F-E) Speed reduction in the core
Average Journey Speed Average Running Speed city area can be contributed
80
70 to high density residential Fixed Delay
F
Average Speed
60 development.
50 Incidental Delay
(km/h)
Avg. Speed
40
: 30.94 km/h
30 D Operational Delay
20
10
0
Road Journey Running
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Journey Time Running Time Delay
Distance (km) ROUTE Length Speed Speed
(mins:secs) (mins:secs) (mins:secs)
Land-use G (km) (km/hr) (km/hr)
Route 4: Jaipur Rd to Nagsur (G-H) Route 1

17.8 40.02 40.65 26:09 25:34 00:35
Average Journey Speed Average Running Speed
(B-A)
60
Route 2
Average Speed
50 Avg. Speed 16.6 31.4 31.4 31:48 31:48 00:00

: 33.01 km/h (C-D)
(km/h)
40
30
20 Route 3 00:48
16.4 39.33 39.81 31:48 27:00
10 (F-E) 04:00
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Distance (km) H Route 4
7.25 33.1 33.1 13:05 13:05 00:00
(G-H )
Land-use

2.13
Presented By-
NETWORK PERFORMANCE
TRAVEL TIME ISOCHRONE
Route 1: (E – W) Jaipur to Jaisalmer (B-A) LEGEND
Peak Hr Speed Off-peak Hr Speed
70
Average Speed (km/hr)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Distance (km)
Avg. Peak Hr. Speed : 40.15 km/hr | Avg. Off Peak Hr Speed : 44.52 km/hr
Avg. speed reduced by 10.88%
Route 2 : (NW - SW) Anoopgarh to Nagaur (C-D)

Peak Hr Speed Off-peak hr Speed
100 5 Minutes
80
10 Minutes
60
40
15 Minutes
20 20 Minutes
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 25 Minutes
Distance (km)
30 Minutes
Route 3: (NE – SE) Ganganagar to Napasar (E-F)

Peak Hr Speed Off-peak Hr Speed
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Distance covered in Time intervals INFERENCES
0 Time Interval Max dist. Travelled Direction
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 • Due to planned development on eastern
Distance (km) North- east
5 Minutes 3.9 km
Avg. Peak Hr. Speed : 30.94 km/hr | Avg. Off Peak Hr Speed : 41.81 km/hr (Towards Jaipur) side of railway line in comparison to the
10 Minutes 7.4 km North (Towards Sri Ganganagar) old city area on western, more distance in
Route 4: Jaipur Rd to Nagaur (G-H) 15 Minutes 11.4 km North (Towards Sri Ganganagar) the same time period towards east and
100
Peak hr Speed Off-Peak hr Speed
20 Minutes 14.1 km North (Towards Sri Ganganagar) north distance.
80
25 Minutes 18.5 km North (Towards Sri Ganganagar) • Following the domino effect, higher
60
40 distance are covered in the north
30 Minutes 24.6 km North (Towards Sri Ganganagar)
20
direction, with time.
0 OBSERVATION AND INFERENCES
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Distance (km) Significant difference in the peak and off peak speed can be witnessed in the core city and middle part. Thereby,
Avg. speed reduced by 29.71% indicating higher traffic in the core area.

2.14
Presented By-
NETWORK PERFORMANCE

Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan

Existing Expressway
National Highway
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
3. TRAFFIC CHARACTERISITICS Railway

Jodhpur
Jaipur
Ratangarh
251
350
134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27

Rajasthan
-
Rajasthan
Bikaner District

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1
CLASSIFIED TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT – SURVEY LOCATIONS
KEY MAP
5 Midblock (13.5 Hours)

06:00 AM to 7:30 PM
MB1 State Electricity Board, Bikaner
MB2 Lakshmi Marriage Palace
M4 MB3 Gokul Circle, Pushkarna Stadium
Jaisalmer Road – 4 L Divided MB4 RSRTC Bus Terminal
MB5 JMD Car Bazar
S3 Jaipur Road
Old Gajner Road – 4 L Divided S2 M5

-4 L Divided 3 Screen Line (13.5 Hours)
SI
06:00 AM to 7:30 PM
M1
M3
Pushkama Road Stadium Road – 4 L Divided Mahatma Gandhi Road – 2 L Undivided SL1 Mukteshwar Mahadev Temple
M2 SL2 Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd, Old
Bikaner Road
GS road (Bikaner Road) - 4 L Divided SL3 Rajasthan Patrika office
INFRENCES
• Mid-Block and Screen Line points are

taken on the major roads which are
covering most part of the city.
SOURCE
- Primary Survey
- Google Earth
3.1
Presented By- Ankit Singh -
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Location & Context SPA/NS/TP/733
VEHICULAR VS PCUs (MID-BLOCK AND SCREEN LINES)
MID BLOCK 1 PCU MID BLOCK 2 PCU
Vechicles
MID BLOCK 3 PCU MID BLOCK 4 PCU
KEY MAP
Vechicles Vechicles Vechicles
4000 2500 2500 3000
3500
2000 2500
3000 2000
2500 2000
1500 1500
2000 1500
1000
1500 1000
Morning Peak Hour Morning Peak 1000
Morning Peak Hour Morning Peak Hour
1000 Hour 500
500 Evening Peak 500 Evening Peak Hour
500 Evening Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour
Hour
0
0 0 0
6:00-7:00
7:00-8:00
8:00-9:00
10:00-11:00
11:00-12:00
12:00-13:00
13:00-14:00
14:00-15:00
15:00-16:00
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
18:00-19:00
9:00-10:00
9:00-10:00
10:00-11:00
11:00-12:00
6:00-7:00
7:00-8:00
8:00-9:00
12:00-13:00
13:00-14:00
14:00-15:00
15:00-16:00
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
18:00-19:00
6:00-7:00
7:00-8:00
8:00-9:00
12:00-13:00
13:00-14:00
14:00-15:00
15:00-16:00
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
18:00-19:00
9:00-10:00
10:00-11:00
11:00-12:00
6:00-7:00
7:00-8:00
8:00-9:00
12:00-13:00
13:00-14:00
14:00-15:00
15:00-16:00
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
18:00-19:00
9:00-10:00
10:00-11:00
11:00-12:00
PCU
MID BLOCK 5 SL 1
INFRENCES
PCU PCU SL 2 PCU SL 3
Vechicles Vechicles
Vechicles Vechicles
6000
4000 3000
3500
3500
2500
5000 • MB 5 has the
3000
2500
3000 4000 maximum traffic flow
2000
2000
2500
3000 30091 PCUs.
2000
• MB 3 has the least
1500
1500 Morning Peak Hour 1500 2000
Morning Peak Morning Peak Hour
1000 Evening Peak Hour 1000
1000
Hour 1000 Evening Peak Hour
traffic flow 12162
Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak
500 500
Evening Peak Hour
500
Hour 0
PCUs.
0 0 0
• SL 3 has the maximum
9:00-10:00
10:00-11:00
11:00-12:00
6:00-7:00
7:00-8:00
8:00-9:00
12:00-13:00
13:00-14:00
14:00-15:00
15:00-16:00
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
18:00-19:00
6:00-7:00
7:00-8:00
8:00-9:00
12:00-13:00
13:00-14:00
14:00-15:00
15:00-16:00
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
18:00-19:00
9:00-10:00
10:00-11:00
11:00-12:00
9:00-10:00
10:00-11:00
11:00-12:00
6:00-7:00
7:00-8:00
8:00-9:00
12:00-13:00
13:00-14:00
14:00-15:00
15:00-16:00
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
18:00-19:00
9:00-10:00
10:00-11:00
11:00-12:00
6:00-7:00
7:00-8:00
8:00-9:00
12:00-13:00
13:00-14:00
14:00-15:00
15:00-16:00
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
18:00-19:00
traffic volume it has
50% share among all
three screen line.
• Screen line 2 has least
Analysis of survey hours percentage of share
ESTIMATED TRAFFIC AT MID-BLOCK (13 HOURS) (24%).
• Due to traffic diversion
Direction 1 Direction 2 Both from SL 1 TO SL 3.
Location • Land use of SL1 & SL3
Peak Hour Percentage Peak Hour Percentage of
Vehicle Vehicle (%) PCU
Volume of Peak
Peak Hour Vehicle Vehicle (%) PCU
Volume Peak
Peak Hour Total Vehicles Total PCU are mostly
commercials.
MB 1 19929 58 11985 1441 12.0 13:15-14:15 14441 42 13609 1494 11.0 9:30-10:30 34370 25594
• In the graph of
MB 2 6880 38 5942 925 15.6 18:00-19:00 11333 62 9556 965 10.1 15:00-16:00 18213 15498 Vehicular VS PCUs
MB 3 8814 51 6258 648 10.4 10:00-11:00 8588 49 5904 760 12.9 9:00-10:00 17402 12162
graph of vehicular if
coming upward which
MB 4 11919 52 11633 1483.5 12.8 10:00-11:00 10835 48 9491 1089 11.5 17:30-18:30 22754 21124 mean no heavy
MB 5 15536 47 14440 1715 11.9 10:00-11:00 17208 53 15651 1847 11.8 17:30-18:30 32744 30091 vehicles are entering.
• Mostly they are using
ESTIMATED TRAFFIC AT SCREEN LINES (13 HOURS) LCV for goods
East West Both movements.
Location
Vehicle
Vehicle
PCU
Peak Hour Percentage
Peak Hour Vehicle Vehicle (%) PCU
Peak Hour Percentage of
Peak Hour Total Vehicles Total PCU
Percentage share of Screen line Traffic SOURCES
% Volume of Peak Volume Peak
• Primary Survey
SL 1 19929 58 11985 14225 42 7763 6:00-7:00 34154 19748 27 • Data Analysis
1381 11.5 10:45-11:45 1120 14.4
• Indo Highway Capacity
SL 2 13123 50 8687 1047 14:00-15:00 13156 50 8682 1111 10:30-11:30 26279 17369 24 Manual, 2017
12.0 12.8
SL 3 22418 49 18317 2074 17:45-18:45 22938 51 18267 2150 9:00-10:00 45356 36584 50
11.3 11.8
3.2
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Survey Hour Analysis SPA/NS/TP/733
MID-BLOCK & SCREEN LINE EXPANSION (24 HOURS)
Car Taxi Jeep/Van Auto Rick.
Two
Mini Bus Bus
LCV/ (Tata 2 Axle Truck
3 Axle Truck (10 Wheeler) MAV Tractor
Tractor +
Cycle Cycle Rick.
Animal
Hand Drawn Vehicle Pedestrian JCB Others
KEY MAP
Wheeler 407) (6 Wheeler) Trailer Drawn
Total 10656 180 1229 8086 18514 51 388 444 1777 52 17 7 23 94 469 5 3 4 0 0 0
Fast Passenger Vehicles Goods Vehicles Slow Modes
Two LCV/ (Tata 2 Axle Truck Tractor + Animal

Time Car Taxi Jeep/Van Auto Rick. Mini Bus Bus 3 Axle Truck (10 Wheeler) MAV Tractor Cycle Cycle Rick. Hand Drawn Vehicle Pedestrian JCB Others
Wheeler 407) (6 Wheeler) Trailer Drawn
19:00-20:00 7.50 3.00 6.83 5.35 6.64 7.84 4.90 4.50 6.08 7.69 0.00 0.00 8.70 5.32 4.90 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
20:00-21:00 6.54 2.00 5.04 2.96 5.12 3.92 0.52 2.93 5.74 3.85 5.88 0.00 0.00 4.26 3.84 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
21:00-22:00 5.10 1.00 4.07 1.77 3.38 5.88 1.80 4.05 1.69 0.00 0.00 42.86 0.00 0.00 3.20 0.00 33.33 0 0 0 0
MID-BLOCK 1 : Towards Jaipur Road (Vehicular)

Time Fast Passenger Vehicles Goods Vehicles Slow Modes
2 Axle
3 Axle
Two LCV (Tata Truck Tractor + Cycle Animals
Car Taxi Jeep/ Van Auto Rick. Mini Bus Govt. Bus Private Bus Truck (10 MAV Tractor Cycle hand drawn cart Pedestrian JCB Others
Wheeler 407) (6
Wheeler)
Trailer Rick. Drawn Methodology
Wheeler)
6:00-7:00 65 2 31 42 78 1 7 10 16 0 8 4 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:00-8:00 228 49 74 126 218 1 3 16 27 7 5 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0
1. Total volume are
8:00-9:00 255 37 34 123 595 6 6 26 35 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 calculated in PCUs
9:00-10:00 340 6 29 215 941 3 5 11 51 4 1 0 7 3 54 0 0 0 11 0 0 from 6:00 - 19:00 of
10:00-11:00 325 1 10 244 830 3 6 7 65 1 0 2 2 6 20 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00-12:00 358 2 13 256 771 1 7 7 84 0 0 0 8 4 12 0 0 0 0 0 0
MB & SL.
12:00-13:00 352 4 30 276 706 1 6 9 46 6 0 0 0 6 20 0 0 0 12 0 0 2. Total volume are
13:00-14:00 462 14 31 289 801 5 7 13 63 3 0 0 0 6 22 0 0 0 10 0 0 calculated in PCUs of
14:00-15:00 394 13 23 233 881 3 7 18 55 3 0 0 2 3 26 0 2 0 17 0 0
15:00-16:00 466 9 13 170 468 1 11 7 68 5 0 0 0 10 19 0 4 0 20 0 0
TMC from 8:00 – 22:00.
16:00-17:00 416 29 2 232 682 1 20 6 82 3 0 0 1 4 8 0 0 0 13 0 0 3. Nearest Mid-Blocks
17:00-18:00 391 10 9 196 799 0 18 1 78 3 1 0 0 4 22 0 0 0 28 0 0 and Screen Line are
18:00-19:00 347 5 22 184 987 1 4 15 86 6 0 0 0 6 33 0 2 0 12 0 0
19:00-20:00 330 5 22 138 582 2 5 7 46 3 0 0 2 3 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 identified.
20:00-21:00 288 4 16 76 448 1 1 4 43 2 1 0 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. Share percentage
21:00-22:00 224 2 13 46 296 2 2 6 13 0 0 3 0 0 9 0 3 0 0 0 0
are taken from TMC
16 HOURS 5241 192 372 2847 10083 32 115 163 858 46 16 9 22 57 317 0 11 0 123 0 0
10% 524 19 37 285 1008 3 11 16 86 5 2 1 2 6 32 0 1 0 12 0 0 for remaining hours of
24 HOURS 5765 211 409 3131 11091 35 126 179 944 50 17 9 24 63 348 0 12 0 135 0 0 Mid- Block and
2 Axle
3 Axle
Screen Lines.
Two LCV (Tata Truck Tractor + Cycle Animals
Car Taxi Jeep/ Van Auto Rick.
Wheeler
Mini Bus Govt. Bus Private Bus
407) (6
Truck (10 MAV Tractor
Trailer
Cycle
Rick. Drawn
hand drawn cart Pedestrian JCB Others 5. These percentage
Wheeler)
Wheeler) are considered for
PCU 1 1 1 1 0.5 1.5 3 3 1.5 3 3 6 1.5 4.5 0.5 2 4 3 0 6 calculating PCUs for
MID-BLOCK 1 : Towards Jaipur Road (PCUs) the remaining hours
2 Axle 19:00 - 22:00 for
3 Axle
Car Taxi Jeep/ Van Auto Rick.
Two
Mini Bus Govt. Bus Private Bus
LCV (Tata Truck
Truck (10 MAV Tractor
Tractor +
Cycle Cycle Rick.
Animals hand
Pedestrian JCB Others respective MB & SL.
Wheeler 407) (6 Trailer Drawn drawn cart
Wheeler)
Wheeler) 6. 10% is taken for the
6:00-7:00 65 2 31 42 39 1.5 21 30 24 0 24 24 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 remaining hours.
7:00-8:00 228 49 74 126 109 1.5 9 48 40.5 21 15 0 0 0 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00-9:00 255 37 34 123 297.5 9 18 78 52.5 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0
7. Same Process is done
9:00-10:00 340 6 29 215 470.5 4.5 15 33 76.5 12 3 0 10.5 13.5 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 for all Mid – Blocks
10:00-11:00 325 1 10 244 415 4.5 18 21 97.5 3 0 12 3 27 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 and Screen Line for
11:00-12:00 358 2 13 256 385.5 1.5 21 21 126 0 0 0 12 18 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
12:00-13:00 352 4 30 276 353 1.5 18 27 69 18 0 0 0 27 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 converting 24 hours
13:00-14:00 462 14 31 289 400.5 7.5 21 39 94.5 9 0 0 0 27 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCUs.
14:00-15:00 394 13 23 233 440.5 4.5 21 54 82.5 9 0 0 3 13.5 13 0 8 0 0 0 0
15:00-16:00 466 9 13 170 234 1.5 33 21 102 15 0 0 0 45 9.5 0 16 0 0 0 0
16:00-17:00 416 29 2 232 341 1.5 60 18 123 9 0 0 1.5 18 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
SOURCES
17:00-18:00 391 10 9 196 399.5 0 54 3 117 9 3 0 0 18 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
18:00-19:00 347 5 22 184 493.5 1.5 12 45 129 18 0 0 0 27 16.5 0 8 0 0 0 0 • Primary Survey
19:00-20:00 330 5 22 138 291 3 16 20 69 9 0 0 3 12 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
20:00-21:00 288 4 16 76 224 2 2 13 65 5 3 0 0 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
• Data Analysis
21:00-22:00 224 2 13 46 148 2 6 18 19 0 0 15 0 0 5 0 11 0 0 0 0 • Indo Highway Capacity
16 HOURS 5241 192 372 2847 5041 48 344 488 1287 137 48 51 33 256 158 0 43 0 0 0 0 Manual
10% 524 19 37 285 504 5 34 49 129 14 5 5 3 26 16 0 4 0 0 0 0
24 HOURS 5765 211 409 3131 5546 52 379 537 1416 151 52 57 36 282 174 0 47 0 0 0 0
3.3
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Data Expansion SPA/NS/TP/733
Traffic Characteristics at Screen Lines ( Estimated 24 Hours)
• SL 3 has the maximum share of traffic volume 46,930 PCUs. KEY MAP
• SL 2 has lowest share of traffic volume 21,852 PCUs.
• SL 3 has the maximum no. of vehicles ( 29085) and percentage of two wheeler is the
most.
• SL 1 has the maximum no two wheelers because it coming towards cote gate & it is
getting converted into one way.
• People are using SL 3 so it high number of traffic volume.
Hourly Pattern of Traffic at Screenlines (PCU)
6000
M4 5000
4000
INFRENCES
3000
PCU
49,915
E 2000 • Traffic Volume at SC 3
W
- 53 %
is high through out the
1000
S3
day.
0 • Total volume towards
9:00-10:00
10:00-11:00
11:00-12:00
12:00-13:00
13:00-14:00
14:00-15:00
15:00-16:00
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
18:00-19:00
6:00-7:00
7:00-8:00
8:00-9:00
East directions is
M5
49,915 which has 53%
S2 of share of total traffic
LEGENDS SI M1
TIME SL 1 SL 2 SL 3 volume.
Traffic Composition at Screen Lines • Total volume towards
M3
West directions is
1% 1%
Screen Line 1 Screen Line 2 44,303 which has 47%
1%
6% 15% of share of total traffic
6% 1%
1%
1% 11% volume.
Screen Line 3
3% 3% 1%
4%
3%
16% • The share percentage
M2 of IPT is 13%
• In Hourly variation
13%
graph screen line 3
has the maximum
73% variation because it
58%
80% caters the maximum
volume.
• The peak hour
volume of screen line
Estimated Traffic at Screen Lines (24 Hours)
is 2074 in the East and
EAST WEST Both
2150 in the West.
Percentage share
• And the percentage
Locations Peak
Peak Hour
of Screen line share of peak hour is
Vehicle Hour % of Peak Vehicle % of Peak Total Design Traffic
Vehicle
%
PCU
Volume Peak Hour
Vehicle
%
PCU Volume
Peak Hour Vehicles
Total PCU
Capacity
V/C LOS 9%
(PCUs)
(PCUs)
18:30- SOURCES
SL 1 25841 58 15462 10:45- 18429 42 9974 44270 25436 1680 1.8 F 27
19:30
1381 8.9 11:45 1120 11.2
Survey Timings: 6.00 am to 14:00- 10:30- • Primary Survey
SL 2 16543 50 10984 1047 16495 50 10868 1111 33038 21852 3780 0.5 C 23
7.30 PM 9.5
15:00
10.2
11:30 • Data Analysis
Conducted at 5 Mid block 17:45-
SL 3 29085 49 23469 2074 29814 51 23461 2150 9:00-10:00 58899 46930 3780 1 E 50
Points & 3 Screen Line Points 8.8
18:45
9.2
3.4
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Screen Line SPA/NS/TP/733
Traffic Characteristics at Mid-Blocks ( Estimated 24 Hours) KEY MAP
Hourly Pattern of Traffic at Mid-Block (PCU) KEY MAP

4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
M4 1500
1000
500
LEGENDS 0
9:00-10:00
10:00-11:00
11:00-12:00
12:00-13:00
13:00-14:00
14:00-15:00
15:00-16:00
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
18:00-19:00
6:00-7:00
7:00-8:00
8:00-9:00
INFRENCES
S3
MB 1 MB 2 MB 3 MB 4 MB 5 • MB 5 is having the
maximum share of
18268
• Mid-Block 5 has the highest share followed by Mid-Block 1 traffic volume count
S2 M5
18245 and Mid Block 3 has lowest traffic volume. 37,925 PCUs
19657
17203
• Mid-Block is maximum variation and Mid- Block 3 is the • The least percentage
SI M1 least variation in the hourly pattern of traffic volume. traffic volume count is
M3 on mid-block 3 (22685)
MID- BLOCK 4 MID- BLOCK 5 PCUs.
Traffic Composition at Mid-Block
4%
• Maximum percentage
MID- BLOCK 3 of share mode is 2
MID- BLOCK 2 1%
0%
7% 0%
17%
1%
wheeler.
3% 2%
M2 1% 1%
6% 2% 1%
0% 25% • Traffic flow towards
1% 4% 3% Inner city is more as
1% 8% 15%
1% 5%
Car Taxi 1%
2%
12% compare to outer.
1%
Jeep/ Van Auto Rick. • People are using two
2%
Two Wheeler Mini Bus 15%
18% wheeler more as
Govt. Bus Private Bus
LCV 2 Axle Truck
46% 51% 14% compare to other
3 Axle Truck MAV 56% modes.
68%
Tractor Tractor + Trailer • The average
Cycle0%
2%
0%
4%
1%
0% 25% Cycle Rick. percentage of IPT is
15%
1%
2%
Animals
51% 14% Drawn hand drawn cart
Estimated Traffic at Mid-Block (24 Hours)
JCB • Mid Block 1 has
Direction 1 Direction 2 Both maximum number car
Design
percentage as
Location V/C LOS
Vehicle
Peak Percent
Vehicle Peak Hour
Percenta
Total Capacity compare to others
1% 7% Vehicle PCU Hour age of Peak Hour Vehicle PCU ge of Peak Hour Total PCU
1%
0%
(%)
Volume Peak
(%) Volume
Peak
Vehicles mid-block.
1% • Mid- block 3 has
MID- BLOCK 1
0%
30%
MB1 22416 51 18245 1441 7.9 13:15-14:15 21470 49 17203 1494 8.7 9:30-10:30 43885 35448 3780 0.70 C maximum share of 2
wheelers.
2% MB2 9410 41 8059 925 11.5 18:00-19:00 13565 59 11428 965 8.4 15:00-16:00 22975 19487 3780 0.48 B
40%
14% 1%
MB3 11560 51 8096 648 8.0 10:00-11:00 11121 49 7610 760 10.0 9:00-10:00 22682 15706 3780 0.42 B SOURCES
MB4 14833 52 14269 1483.5 10.4 10:00-11:00 13512 48 11747 1089 9.3 17:30-18:30 28345 26016 3780 0.60 C
• Primary Survey
• Data Analysis
MB5 19696 47 18268 1715 9.4 10:00-11:00 21777 53 19657 1847 9.4 17:30-18:30 41474 37925 3780 0.78 D
3.5
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Mid - Block SPA/NS/TP/733
GANGA NAGAR CHAURAHA KEY MAP
TRAFFIC PRIMARY SURVEY

GANGA NAGAR CHAURAHA
Suratgarh Bikaner CHARACHETERISTICS
LEGEND
ROAD MEDIAN Road • Intersection connects Sri Ganga Nagar Vehicles handled by 11795
CARRIAGEWAY
Road in N, Jaisalmer Road in the W and intersection (14 hrs)
SHOULDER
CENTRAL ISLAND E and Jaipur. Total PCU for (14 Hrs) 11462
PSP
3
• Configuration- 4 armed Non-Signalised, Peak hour 9:15-10:15
All Arms are Divided Peak hour PCU 3485
• Survey Duration: 14 hrs
• Survey Timings: 8:00 am to 22:00 pm Peak Hour share 9.1 %
Peak Hour Factor 0.994 INFRENCES
Details ARM 1 ARM 2 ARM 3 ARM 4 • Traffic movement is

2
toward city center
Carriageway 15 M 15 15 15
4 because it is
Road Type Primary Primary Primary Primary commercial area
people are coming
ROW (m) 30 M 30 M 30 M 28 M for shopping.
• It is the core part of
1 Daily Traffic Composition Daily PCU Composition the city.
0.12% 0.07% 0.49% • Junagarh Fort and
Rampuria Haveli is
0.42%
Sri Ganganagar 1.20% 0.12% 0.03%
0.18%
0.29% 0.08%
1.87% 0.13%
also located in this
0.02% 1.23%
Road 0.19% 1.12% 0.35%
0.39% 0.03%
2.38% 0.40% 0.58%

1.61% area.
• People are using 2
3.42% 5.78%
Turning Movement Diagram for 14 Hours (PCU) 1.23%
18.76%
8.55% wheeler most 36%,

7.35%
followed by car 22%,
11894 (30%)
36.46%
and auto rickshaw

9496 (25%)
3
3.52%
21%
Towards Suratgarh
• The share
21.03% percentage of peak
13.19% 23.22%
hour is 9.1% in the
3826 (32 %)
1684 (14 %)
6384 (53 %)
Towards Jaipur morning 9:15-10:15

Towards Jaisalmer AM.
22.57%
• The share
1105 (18)%
5914 (15%) 13183 (34%)
21.64%
percentage of PCUs
4140 (70%)
667 (11 %)
of Car is 22% is
2 4 maximum followed
4878 (43 %)
by auto rickshaw is
8572 (22%) 1762 (15 %) 11328 (28%)
• Majority traffic is moving towards the city • 2-Ws had the highest share(36%)
21%
4688 (41 %)
centre in peak hour. followed by Cars (22%) and Autos
3513 (38 %)
5217 (57 %)
426 (7 %)
• Maximum traffic movement is observed from (21%).

2 – 4 Arm i.e. from West to East Followed by 1 to • Maximum PCU is composed of Cars
Arm 4 i.e. South to East & Least Traffic was (23%), Auto (21.6%) and 2-W (19%)
observed 1-2 and 2-1 i.e. from South to west & followed by Inter-City Pvt Buses
SOURCES
7039 (19%)
west to south. (7.35%), Inter-City Gov. Buses (5.7%) and

10956 (28%)
1 Towards LCV (13%). Primary Survey

Ganganagar IHCM, 2017
3.6
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi TMC – Ganganagar Chauraha SPA/NS/TP/733
INTRODUCTION
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT KEY MAP
GANGA NAGAR CHAURAHA TRAFFIC CHARACHETERISTICS PRIMARY SURVEY

Museum Vehicles handled by 41642
Road • Intersection connects Sri Ganga Nagar intersection (14 Hrs)
Road in N, Jaisalmer Road in the W and Total PCU for 14 Hrs 37642.5
E and Jaipur. Peak hour 18:15-19:15
LEGEND 2 3 • Configuration- 4 armed Non-Signalised,
Peak hour PCU 3218.5
ROAD MEDIAN
CARRIAGEWAY
2 to 4 undivided and 1 to 3 divided
SHOULDER • Survey Duration: 14 hrs Peak Hour share 9.02 %
CENTRAL ISLAND
PSP • Survey Timings: 8:00 am to 22:00 pm Peak Hour Factor 0.991
COMMERCIAL
FOOTHPATH
Details ARM 1 ARM 2 ARM 3 ARM 4
INFRENCES
Carriageway 7M 7M 7M 7M • Traffic movement is
Road Type Primary Road Primary Road Primary Road Primary Road toward city center
1
because it is
ROW (m) 30 M 20 M 22 M 20 M
commercial area
4 people are coming
Daily Traffic Composition Daily PCU Composition for shopping.
0.02% 0.01%
Two Wheeler
• It is the core part of
0.11% 0.03%
the city.
0.12% Car
0.90%
0.04% 0.01% 0.14%
0.95% Auto Rick. 0.50% 0.03%
1.28%
0.07% 0.01%
LCV/ (Tata 407) 3.18%
0.13% 0.03% • Junagarh Fort and
4.08%
0.48% 0.13%
0.48% Jeep/Van
0.42% 0.54%
0.22% Rampuria Haveli is
also located in this
2.42%
Bus (Pvt) 4.31% 21.46%
6.06%
Bus (Gov) area.
Turning Movement Diagram for 14 Hours (PCU) Taxi
6.86%
• People are using 2-
38.27% Cycle
wheeler most 38%,
2 Axle Truck
6.80% followed by car 23%,
13096 (31%)
(6 Wheeler)
and auto rickshaw

Tractor + Trailer
8384 (20%)
Towards 23.38% Mini Bus

Museum Circle 3
3 Axle Truck (10 Wheeler)
23%
Tractor • The share
Animal Drawn 26.58% percentage of peak
hour is 9.02% in the
7608 (58 %)
5239 (40 %)
MAV
26.23%
249 (2%)
Towards Dhola Maru

Towards Rangmanch
Hand Drawn Vehicle Evening 18:15-19:15
23.70% Cycle Rick.
PM.
154 (2)% • The share
7494 (18%) 1038 (14%) 10265 (25%) percentage of PCUs
6302 (84 %) of Car is 21% which is
2 4
• Majority traffic is moving towards the city centre in • 2-Ws had the highest share maximum followed
3445 (34 %)
7288 (17%) 10010 (24%) peak hour. followed by Cars and Autos. by auto rickshaw
2284 (23 %)
• Share of IPT was observed at and 2-wheeler is 26%
4281 (43 %) • Maximum traffic movement is observed from 2-1
21 %.
4668 (42 %)
4755 (43 %)
1619 (15 %)
Arm i.e. from West to South Followed by 3 to Arm 4

• Maximum PCU is composed
i.e. North to East & Least Traffic was observed 2-3
of Cars (26%), Auto (26%) and
and 3-1.
2-W (21%) followed by Inter-
• Least Traffic was observed 3-2 and 2-3 i.e. from North
City Pvt Buses (4.3%), Inter-City
15822 (38%)
to west & west to North. SOURCES

Gov. Buses (3.1%) and LCV
11042 (27%)
• Traffic moving towards core part of the city, Bikaner. Primary Survey
1 Towards PBM Hospital (6.8%).
IHCM, 2017
3.7
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi TMC – Puran Singh Circle SPA/NS/TP/733
CORE AREA DELINEATION
KEY MAP
DEFINITION & UNDERSTANDING HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF THE CITY
Central Area Characteristics: 1486 • Bikaner, was known by the name of Jangladesh and was under the
rule of Rajputs.
• High Density Old city area • Rao Bika, a Rajput ruler, built the city of Bikaner by building the
1611 Junagrah Fort. Since Bikaner was in the middle of the Thar desert, it
• The settlement is initially served as an oasis and was on the trade route between Gujarat
pedestrian oriented with streets coast and Central Asia.
in primitive stage, with the
1818 • The major development that happened in Bikaner was under the rule
urban area being limited by the
of Raja Rai Singh
distance one could walk in a
• In 1818, during the rule of Maharaja Surat Singh, Bikaner came under
reasonable period of time.
the rule of the British.
The continued growth of personal 1924 • Bikaner Railways came in 1924, The Direct line Bikaner to Delhi Came LEGEND
vehicles and their increased in 1941
presence on roads resulted in
congestion on many roads in
1985 2000 2020
most cities, especially in central
areas and major arterials.
CONTEXT AND CONNECTIVITY
Towards Towards
Anoopgarh Lunkaransar
MAJOR LANDMARKS
1 2 3
2
Jaisalmer
Junagarh
Towards
Fort
Towards
Jaipur
Junagarh Fort Road
Kote Gate Rampuria Haveli Junagarh Fort Kote Gate

Railway
Station SOURCE:
• National Highway is passing from west towards east shaping the major Primary Survey
central area of the city in bean shaped form.
• Railway Line is dividing the city into two parts, wherein in eastern side, SCALE: 1:15000
1 Junagarh Fort is there whereas in Western the side the old walled city is 0 0.1250.25 0.5 0.75 1
Rampuria situated. Kilometers
Haveli
• The central area of the city is organically developed area with predominant
mixed use and commercial land use along with high dense residential
areas.
• No Green spaces are present in the western side of the Railway line whereas
in the east, some patches of green areas are visible along the Junagarh
Towards Jodhpur
Fort.
3.8
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043 Presented By-
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Core Area Characteristics Nandini Jain
Master in Transport Planning, 2nd Semester (SPA/NS/TP/2022/741)
CORE AREA DELINEATION
CRITERIA SELECTED FOR CORE AREA DELINEATION KEY MAP
EXISTING WALLED CITY
SELECTION CRITERIA
• Walled City, Historical Characteristics
• Existing Land Use • Road Network
• Existing Density • Development Typology
EXISTING LAND USE (2023)

1 Junagarh Fort Road
2
6
LEGEND
Arterial
3 EXISTING TRAFFIC
Sub-Arterial
MANAGEMENT (2023)
Collector
Local
4 5
LAND USE
Residential In the eastern side of Railways, there existed a walled city which has 6 main gates
utility
which has the characteristics of old city in terms of heritage buildings and havelis.
Commercial
PSP
Recreational
DELINEATED CORE AREA
Transport
4 Wheeler Restriction Traffic RESTRICTION
• In the western central area, commercial land use and mixed land use is On Street Parking
Four Wheeler Restriction from
present with most of the city’s economic activities happening, i.e., around IPT Stand
7AM to 9PM
kote Gate, KEM Road , Phar Bazaar, etc. KEM Road
• Whereas, In the eastern side, major government offices such as Municipal Ward Area Density (Stretch: Junagarh Fort to Kote
Population
corporation, court, SP Office, etc. is located. No. (HA) (PPH) Gate)
Kote Gate 8 32.87 10978 334
EXISTING DENSITY (2023) 9 32.39 9385 290
Traffic REGULATION
12 40.94 10871 266 ONE WAY MOVEMENT

13 15.73 11,897 756 KEM Road, Station Road
Rampuria 14 14.4 11,024 765
Haveli 15 16.7 9,666 579
16 49.23 10,902 221
LEGEND
17 32 9,003 281
Arterial
28 75.32 10,701 142
Sub-Arterial 29 17.83 9,083 509
SOURCE:
Collector 30 22.86 8,136 356 Primary Survey
31 46.84 11,576 247
Local
356 1,23,222 395 SCALE: 1:15000
DENSITY (PPH) 0 0.1250.25 0.5 0.75 1
< 100 AREA: 3.56 SQKM Kilometers
POPULATION: 1,23,233
100- 200
DENSITY: 395 PPH
200-400 PREDOMINANT LAND USE: Residential and Commercial
400 < WARDS: 12 (8, 9, 12-17, 28-31)
MAJOR LANDMARKS: Rampuria Haveli
Western area is highly dense residential area followed by medium density in the
MAJOR MARKETS: Bada Bazaar, Kote Gate Market,
eastern side of Railway line and in the close proximity to Junagarh Fort.
3.9
NETWORK & TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
KEY MAP
NETWORK CHARCATERISTICS TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
Network Distribution
10.813
14879 3
13.494
80969
C C’
A 75.692
04152
A’ 2
C
Sub arterial Road
1 C’
Collector Road
LEGEND
Local Road Arterial Road VEHICULAR
COMPOSITION
B • Total Road network in
Sub-Arterial Road
B’
the core area is around Collector Road
KOTE GATE LOCATION
84.1 km in length. Local Road
LEGEND 451,
• 75% of the Road LOS F
Arterial 2043, 2%3678,
network in the core city LOS E 6% 11%
Sub-Arterial car
comprises of local 319,
1%
Collector roads having ROW of 3- • 82% (27,080) of the vehicles crossing the KEM Road is two jeep
Local 6m. wheelers followed by 11% (3678) Auto rickshaws and 6%
27080, auto rickshaw
(2043)Cycles as the 4wheelers entry is restricted through KEM
EXISTING CROSS SECTIONS Road.
80%
two wheeler
• Traffic Flow volume is increasing from morning 6 AM till 11 AM
at a constant rate due to market stretch and peak hour is
achieved at 6 PM to 7PM in the evening.
Due to Commercial land
LEVEL OF SERVICE AT KOTE GATE use and mix of different
Location Total Peak Hour Peak Capacity V/C LOS
markets, pedestrians count
Volume Volume Hour is more near the Kote
Share Gate. Absence of
SL1 28233 2986 10.6 2400 124 F footpath, Shoulder is
A A’ C C’ SL2 24663 2599 10.5 4800 0.54 C encroached by parking
and vendors.
Level of Service of the KEM Road is F, causing congestion on the
whole stretch near the screen line even though the vehicular
composition only consists of two wheelers and auto rickshaws.
INFERENCES:
• Most of the roads are encroached by RAIL-ROAD CROSSING WARRANT
the shopkeepers or hawkers taking the
shoulder space IN 12M ROW Road. Total Vehicles Passing through Screen line 1 in 24 Hours 50848
Total PCU Passing through Screen line 1 in 24 Hours
• Congestion on the Collector Road (KEM (Auto Rickshaw: 0.5, Two wheeler: 0.25) 13700 SCALE: 1:15000
road) irrespective of one way 0 0.1250.25 0.5 0.75 1
Total Trains Passing through Screen line 1 in 24 Hours 39.6
movement and four wheeler restriction Kilometers
due to narrow road width and mixed TRAFFIC VEHICLE UNIT (TVU) = No. of trains * No. of road vehicles
land use. = 5,42,520 SOURCE:
• Most of the vehicles are parked on- Primary Survey
As per Indian railway permanent way manual 2020, the TVU is Train Schedule, Bikaner
B street only as there is no proper railway Station
B’ greater than 50,000 at KOTE GATE Location, which suggests that
designated spaces inside the walled Indian Railway Permanent
(Special case) Level crossing is required.
city. Way Manual, 2020

3.10
Presented By-

Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan

Existing Expressway
National Highway
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
4. HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL CHARACTERISITICS Railway

Jodhpur
Jaipur
Ratangarh
251
350
134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27

Rajasthan
-
Rajasthan
Bikaner District

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1
Demographic Profile of City, Decadal Population and Growth rate Trend
Demographic Profile of City(Bikaner M.C.) Decadal Population Trend(Bikaner M.C.)
Parameters Census 2011 7,00,000
Municipal Area 176.15 sq km 6,44,406
Population 6,44,406 6,00,000 5,29,690
Decadal Growth in Population (2001-2011) 21.66 %
Total Households 1,15,380
5,00,000 4,16,289
Decadal Growth in no. of HH (2001-2011) 34.83%
Population
Average Household Size (2011) 5.6
Sex Ratio 904 4,00,000
2,87,712
Total no. of Wards 60
Population Density 42 PPH 3,00,000
2,08,894
1,30,293
1,66,772
Decadal Population and Growth Rate(Bikaner M.C.) 2,00,000
Area 1,00,000
Census year Population Growth Rate (%)
(Sq. Km)
1951 130,293
0
1961 166,772 28.00% 59.75
1971 208,894 25.26% 59.75 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011
1981 287,712 37.73% 73.79 Census Year
1991 416,289 44.69% 176.15
2001 529,690 27.24% 176.15
Decadal Growth Rate Trend(Bikaner M.C.)
2011 644,406 21.66% 176.15
More In-migration Due to Indira Rise in growth Reduced In-migration
Villages – Population(2001 and 2011) Gandhi Canal Project rate due to Completion of Gandhi canal
Sl. No. Village Name Population (2001) Population (2011) change in area Project and it’s
1 Beechhwal 1382 1937 50% Extension toward Jaisalmer
2 Udasar 4186 6588 45%
3 Ridmalsar Purohitan 2596 3934 40%

Growth Rate (%) 35%
4 Nainon Ka Bas 260 340
5 Chak Garbi 434 675 30%
-
44.69%
6 Sharah Nathaniya 0 0 25%
37.73%
7 Jorbeer 297 447
20%
28.00%
8 Sharah Koojiya 476 623
27.24%
25.26%
15%
21.66%
9 Nagasar Sugni 849 924
10 Pemasar 1659 2241 10%
11 Panpalsar 858 793 5%
12 Himtasar 989 1229
0%
13 KISHMIDESAR 0 0 1951 - 1961 1961 - 1971 1971 - 1981 1981 - 1991 1991 - 2001 2001 - 2011
14 BHINASAR 0 0 Year
Total 13986 19731 Reference: Census of India, Master Plan Bikaner

Demography
Presented By-
Suraj Singh Saini 4.1
Comparison with State, Region and Similar size Cities
Growth rate - Bikaner(city), Bikaner(Division) & Rajasthan Growth rate trend (1981-2011)
Growth Rate 50.00

Area
1981-91 1991-01 2001-11 45.00
Bikaner(City) 44.69 27.24 21.66 40.00
Bikaner Division (Urban) - 23.32 20.19 35.00
Growth rate(%)
Bikaner Division (Total) 32.50 28.43 17.98 30.00
Rajasthan (Urban) - 30.21 25.15 25.00
20.00
Rajasthan (Total) 28.44 28.41 21.31
15.00
Box plot of Decadal growth rate for Bikaner(city) and similar size 10.00
settlements (1981-2011)
5.00
0.00
1981-91 1991-01 2001-11
Bikaner(City) Bikaner(Division-Urban) Bikaner(Division) Rajasthan(State) Rajasthan(State-Urban)
Similar size settlements Inferences

44.6 • Bikaner City, Division
Sl No. City Population
1 Thiruvananthapuram 743691 and Rajasthan shows
2 Bhiwandi 709665 decreasing growth rate.
3 Saharanpur 705478
4 Gorakhpur 673446 • On comparing with
27.2
5 Guntur 647508
- Similar size settlements,
6 Amravati 647057
Bikaner growth rate lies
7 Bikaner 644406
21.6
8 Jamshedpur 631364 above mean and
9 Bhilai 625700
median which shows
10 Warangal 615998
11 Cuttack 610189 that the growth is
12 Firozabad 604214
moderately high as
13 Bhavnagar 593368
14 Durgapur 566517 compare with similar
15 Asansol 563917 settlements.
1981-91 1991-01 2001-11 16 Nanded 550439
17 Ajmer 542321 Reference: Census of India

Demography
Presented By-
Population Estimation for 2023
Population Estimation(Selected Methods) – Villages
Population Projection – Bikaner M.C.
Year Village Population Population Projection
Year Actual Linear Polynomial Power Exponential Arithmatic Geometric Incremental Increase
y = 120989x + 169252 y = -7588x2 + 151341x + 143959 y = 286630x0.5531 y = 216635e0.3052x Pn = P0+(n.X) + {n (n+1)/2}.Y 2001 13,986 -
Populatio Increase Increase
n
R² = 0.9987 R² = 1 R² = 0.99 R² = 0.9849 Pn= P0+(r x n) Pn =P0 (1+r/100)^n 2011 19,731
2021 - 25,476
1981 2,87,712 - - - - - - -
2023 26,625
1991 4,16,289 - - - - - - -
2001 5,29,690 - - - - - - -
Population Estimation(Selected Methods) – Bîkaner M.C.
2011 6,44,406 6,53,208 6,27,915 6,17,051 7,28,346 6,50,679 7,14,504 6,35,503
2021 - 7,74,197 7,10,964 6,98,107 9,86,256 7,71,668 9,63,802 7,26,140 Year M.C. Population Population Projection
% error 1.37% 2.56% 4.25% 13.03% 0.97% 10.88% 1.38% 1981 287,712 -
1991 416,289 -
2001 529,690 -
Growth rate – Bikaner M.C. 2011 644,406
2021 - 7,72,933
Year Population Growth Rate Linear Polynomial Power Exponential Arithmetic Geometric Incremental 2023 7,97,130
1981 287,712 - - - - - - -
1991 416,289 44.69% - - - - - - - Study Area Population
2001 529,690 27.24% - - - - - - -
2011 644,406 21.66% 23.32% 18.54% 16.49% 37.50% 22.84% 34.89% 19.98% Base Year (2023) 8,23,755
2021 - - 18.52% 13.23% 13.14% 35.41% 18.59% 34.89% 14.26%
Actual Growth Rate

Population Actual Population Decadal Growth Rate
12,00,000 50 Linear
Linear
Polynomial
10,00,000
40 Power
Polynomial
Growth Rate(%)
8,00,000 Exponential
Population
Power
30
Arithmatic
6,00,000 Increase
Exponential 20 Geometric
Increase
4,00,000 Incremental
Arithmatic Increase
Increase 10 B. Division(Urban)
2,00,000
Geometric Bikaner(Division)
Increase
0
0 Rajasthan
1981 1991 2001 2011 2021 Incremental Increase 1981-1991 1991-2001 2001-2011 2011-2021
Year Year Rajasthan(Urban)
STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 Inferences

• Linear and Arithmetic Increase
Projected population for the methods are selected for

Collection of Compared all the three Considering the least error By trend fitting for Population for the year
Population data from year 2011 using Linear, projected population for population estimation.
method and finding the most population and Growth 2021, 2023 are Estimated
CENSUS for year Polynomial, Power, Exponential, 2011 with given CENSUS suitable Method for rate, finalizing the • Base year population is
by respective selected
1981-2001 Arithmetic, Geometric and 2011 population. Projection. Method for Projection method. estimated to be 8,23,755
Incremental method.

Demography
Presented By-
Density Map - 2023
Ward-Wise Details
Gross
Primary Survey - Data Analysis
Town/ Area
Population Density
Ward No. (Ha.)
(PPH) Decadal Household size variation
Bikaner
17614 7,97,130 45
(M.Corp)
1 862.77 21,343 24.74 Total Total
Average HH
2 102.44 17,314 169.02 Households Population Males Females
3 110.84 16,179 145.96 Size
4 51.66 11,870 229.78 Surveyed Surveyed
5 126.45 14,040 111.03
6 2596.02 17,544 6.76 840 4169 5.02 47% 53%
7 219.16 9,359 42.70
8 32.87 10,978 333.99
9 32.39 9,385 289.75
10 33.19 15,041 453.17 Depencency Ratio
11 34.29 10,046 292.96
12 40.94 10,871 265.53
13 15.73 11,897 756.35 Dependency
14 14.4 11,024 765.57 Productive Dependent
15 16.7 9,666 578.80
Ratio
Legend 16 49.23 10,902 221.44
Core area Gross17 32 9,003 281.34 2023(Primary
18 198.86 16,137 81.15 6552 2107 32
Density Survey)
2043 density 19 3098.27 12,512 4.04
(PPH)2023
Legend
2043 density 20 Bellow - 10 70.93 20,164 284.28
21 11 - 50 45.8 9,119 199.11
Bellow - 10 22 91.2 18,243 200.04
2011(Census) 405416 234093 58
11 - 50 23 51 - 100 88.26 13,075 148.14
24 101 - 200 102.46 14,562 142.12
51 - 100 25 956.22 29,943 31.31
101 - 200 26 201 - 400 262.11 14,224 54.27 Density - 2023
27 401 - Above133.12 14,686 110.32
201 - 400 28 75.32 10,701 142.08
Density
29 17.83 9,083 509.44 Density(PPH)
401 - Above Area
30 0.000000 - 22.86
6.817554 8,136 355.89 Gross(PPH) Net(PPH)
Z
Z Urban Limit Boundary 31 46.84 11,576 247.14
Municipal Boundary
Road_Hierarchy_basemap
32 8.49 9,587 1129.18
Road 33 Hierarchy18.8 8,142 433.08 Municipal Corporation 45 168
Census ward boundary 34 54.41 10,888 200.11
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
VILLAGE 35 Arterial 69.12 11,237 162.57
36 Sub-arterial
154.08 6,456 41.90 Villages 1 21
buffer_0 37 91.03 10,848 119.17
38 Collector 394.11 Total Study Area
Age-Sex Pyramid - 2011 Age-Sex Pyramid -buffer_1
2023 39 Local 779.82
10,341
18,861
26.24
24.19
18 137
buffer_1point5 40 1876.9 17,642 9.40
41 Expressway
80+ buffer_2 174.29 14,616 83.86
Inference:
70-79 ELDER AGE
80+ 42 Arterial 75.41 10,273 136.23
ELDER AGE 16.69 %
70-79 GROUP 29.15% GROUP buffer_2point5 43 855.56 18,006 21.05 • 75 % people will be in the elderly age group section after
60-69
60-69
buffer_3 44 Arterial 909.79 30,157 33.15 -
20 years, therefore health facilities should be proposed to
50-59 45 Sub-arterial887.7 11,513 12.97
50-59 buffer_4 46 119.66 13,716 114.62
cater these people.
40-49
40-49 47 61.96 12,818 206.87
35-39 buffer_5
35-39 48 86.05 14,066 163.46 • Dependency ratio (2023) is 32 which shows that city has
30-34 WORKING 30-34 WORKING buffer_7_5 75.66 % 49 41.07 10,239 249.30 a strong base of working age group people.
25-29
AGE GROUP 62.91% 25-29 AGE GROUP buffer_10 50 77.31 15,861 205.16
20-24 51 90.63 6,797 75.00
20-24
15-19
buffer_13 52 26.52 8,115 305.98 • Less density(10 PPH and bellow) is observed in Peripheral
15-19
10-14 buffer_16 53 27.38 12,883 470.54 wards and surrounding villages.
10-14 54 55.4 14,162 255.64
YOUNGER 5-9 YOUNGER buffer_19 55 61.84 8,564 138.48
5-9 7.63 %
0-4
AGE 7.18%
0-4
AGE
Vill_Boundary 56 63.38 10,223 161.29 • High density (400 – 1095) is observed in the core area
57 237.27 5,865 24.72 wards.
15 10 5 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 15 10 5 0.0 Census
5.0 ward
10.0 boundary
15.0 58 257.84 24,468 94.90
59 150.68 17,924 118.95
% Male % Female % Female % Male 60 326.33 14,239 43.63 Reference: Census of India, Primary Survey

Demography
Presented By-
Density Decay Curve (Existing 2023)
466 500
427
450
337 400 350
350
224
300
W 140
104
250
200
176
125
E
98 150 101
46 100 68 46 40
10 35 16
2 50
4
0
-8.5
-5
-10
-9.5
-9
-8
-7.5
-7
-6.5
-6
-5.5
-4.5
-4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
10
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
5.5
6.5
7.5
8.5
9.5
13
19
N
10
7.5
1 2 3 4 5 7.5 10 13 16
S
Map Showing Directional Density Decay Curve (Existing 2023)
Overall Density Decay Curve Bikaner - 2023

500 467
450
400
358
y = 416.8x-1.951
350 R² = 0.7469
Density (PPH)
300
250 218
200 148
150 107
96
100 48
39
14 3 2 1
50 1
0
1
10.5
11.5
12.5
13.5
14.5
16.5
17.5
18.5
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
5.5
6.5
7.5
8.5
9.5
15.5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Distance (Km)
Inference:
• Highest Density is observed in the core area.
• Within 0.5 km radius the density is high(above 400pph).
• In East to West direction the spread of density is slightly more toward west.
• In North to South direction the spread of density more toward south.

Demography
Presented By-
HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS
Details as per Census 2011 and Base Year 2023 Number KEY MAP SPATIAL REPRESENTATION OF SURVEYED HH
Total wards 60
Total population of Bikaner
Total households
Avg. Household size
6,44,406
1,15,380
5.6
¯
Estimated population of Urban Bikaner as per 2023 7,97,130
Estimated population of Villages as per 2023 26,625
Total population of study area as per Base year (2023) 8,23,755
Total Households for Base year (2023) 1,64,095
Total trips in the Study area for Base year (2023) 4,89,444
Details as per Primary Survey 2023 Units

Sample size 0.6%
Households Surveyed 840
Avg. Household size for surveyed samples 5.02
Population surveyed 4169
Total Passenger trips by population surveyed 2469
Per Capita Trip Rate (PCTR.) with Walk and Cycle 0.60
Per Capita Trip Rate (PCTR.) without Walk and Cycle 0.41
PURPOSE-WISE COMPOSITION OF TRIPS FREQENCY WISE
RECREATIO SOCIAL COMPOSITION OF TRIPS
2% OTHER 1%
NAL WEEKENDS THRICE A
SHOPPIN
4% 5% WEEK
G TWICE A
BUSINESS 5% 1%
WEEK
6%
2%
TWICE A
WORK DAY 0 0.751.5 3 4.5 6
46% 16%
Kilometers
EDUCATION
MODE-WISE TRIPS WITH WALK AND WITHOUT WALK LEGEND
LEGEND
36% INTERCITY
Z Urban Limit Boundary
INTERCITY AUTO
BUS Municipal Boundary
DAILY CAR CAR BUS RICKSHAW
2% 3%
10%
survey_locationsB
76% 7% 8%
Study area boundary
INFERENCES WALK SHARED
HH_2023
AUTO
• Work trips accounts to the maximum number of 24%
12% 0 - 600
trips as there’s a large share of government 601 - 1900
employees followed by educational trips both TWO 1901 - 2700
CYCLE
accounting to 82% of Total trips. WHEELE 8%
2701 - 4250
• The predominant frequency of trips is daily, TRIP SHARE R 4251 - 6000

AUTO
followed by twice a day. 45% Road_Hierarchy
RICKSHAW TWO
• Two wheelers, and walk trips have the 6%
Road Hierarchy
Non-motorised Motorised trips SHARED WHEELE
maximum modal split share accounting 68% of 32% 68% R
Arterial
AUTO
Total trips
Sub-arterial
8% 67%
Collector
• Private vehicle counts for 77% of Motorised trips.
TOTAL TRIPS = 4,89,444 MOTORISED TRIPS WITHOUT WALK = 3,31,163 Local

Household Travel
Characteristics
Presented By-
AMAN ULLAH 4.10
HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS WARDWISE TRIP PRODUCED KEY MAP
Details as per Primary Survey 2023 Units
Bikaner City Average Trip Length (ATL) 3.69 km.
Average Waiting time by Person for IPT 8.9 min.
TRIP CHARACTERISTICS FOR IPT MODES

(AUTO AND SHARED AUTO)
Avg.
Avg. Time Avg. Cost
Distance
(MINUTES) (Rs.) LEGEND
(KM) LEGEND
Study area boundary
Access Trip 0.85 9.75 6.74 Trips_2023
Main Haul Trip 3.24 17.50 26.88

0 - 1800
1801 - 5500
Dispersal Trip 0.69 10.11 11.92 5501 - 8300

8301 - 11000
TRIP CHARACTERISTICS FOR PRIVATE MODES (2W & 4W) Z

Z
11001 - 18500
Urban Limit Boundary
Avg.
Avg. Time Avg. Cost
Municipal Boundary
Distance Study area boundary

(MINUTES) (Rs.)
(KM)
HH_2023
0 - 600
Main Haul Trip 4.28 17.89 58.22 601 - 1900

1901 - 2700
INFERENCES
2701 - 4250
4251 - 6000
• People are preferring Car for their long trip inside the city. Road_Hierarchy
Road Hierarchy
Shared auto, car and cycle takes the max. time per trip. INFERENCES Arterial
• Two wheeler 45% of Total Trips have medium distance trips • Intermediate public transportation is more cost effective than the Private Sub-arterial
and are most time and cost effective

Collector
Modes, but are taking more time to travel the same distance comparatively. Local
TRIP CHARACTERISTICS BY VARIOUS MODES

MODE WISE AVG. TRIP LENGTH MODE WISE AVG. TRIP TIME MODE WISE AVG. TRIP COST
10 30 28 80 76.7
8.66
25 23.44 24.2
8
6.95 60
20
KILOMETERS
17.64 17.1
6 16.26
MINUTES
RUPEES
15 40 34.8
4.07 4.06
4 28
9.56
2.61 10
1.94 20 17.01 16.23
2
0.97 5
0 0
0 0 0

Household Travel
Characteristics
Presented By-
AMAN ULLAH 4.11
MODE-WISE COMBINED TLFD TLFD.
100%
MODE (MOTORISED) INFERENCE (MODE WISE TLFD.) INFERENCES FOR MODE WISE TLFD & TTFD
TRIP LENGTH(KM.) • Private vehicle [Car 5.4 km. and 2W 3.8 km.] with 77%
MODE of Motorised Trip% has a higher TLFD percentile over
CUMULATIVE FREQUECY
80%
50TH 75TH
75TH PERCENTILE (L75) Auto and Shared auto [3.5km.], showing higher
60%
AUTO
3.6 4.2
dependency on Private vehicle inside the city at L50.
40%
50TH PERCENTILE (L50) RICKSHAW • Two Wheelers with 67% of Motorised Trip% has 75th
SHARED AUTO 3.5 4.4 Percentile at 3.8 km and 17minutes of, shows that it is
20%
mostly used for short trips.
TWO WHEELER 3.8 5.0
0% • Autos has the least distance covered [4.3 km.] at L75,
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 CAR 5.4 6.6 while Intercity Bus with 3% of Motorised Trip% has the
DISTANCE IN KILOMETERS
AUTO RICKSHAW SHARED AUTO TWO WHEELER CAR BUS BUS 7.3 8.2 maximum distance covered [8.2 km. and 41 min.] at
L75, that are used by the Sub urban to reach the city
MODE-WISE COMBINED TTFD.
MODE (MOTORISED) TTFD INFERENCE (MODE WISE TTFD.) center.
100%
TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) MODE (NMT.) TLFD INFERENCES FOR
MODE 100%
CUMULATIVE FREQUECY
80%
50TH 75TH NMT
CUMULATIVE FREQUECY
75TH PERCENTILE (L75) 80%
60%
AUTO 75TH PERCENTILE (L75)
• Walk has the least
17.0 20.2 60% distance covered
40%
50TH PERCENTILE (L50) RICKSHAW
40%
50TH PERCENTILE (L50) [0.8km.], while Cycle
SHARED AUTO 17.0 23.0 has covered [1.5km.]
20%
20%
TWO WHEELER 12.0 17.0 at L50, as Cycle 65%
0% 0%
trips are used for
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 CAR 20.0 27.0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
TIME IN MINUTES DISTANCE IN KILOMETERS Educational purpose.
WALK CYCLE
AUTO RICKSHAW SHARED AUTO TWO WHEELER CAR BUS BUS 26.5 41.0
PURPOSE-WISE COMBINED
PURPOSE TLFD TLFD. PURPOSE-WISE
PURPOSECOMBINED
TTFD TTFD.
RECREATIO SOCIAL 100%
100% 2% OTHER 1%
NAL
SHOPPIN
4%
G
CUMULATIVE FREQUECY
80%
CUMULATIVE FREQUECY
80%
BUSINESS 5%
75TH PERCENTILE (L75) 6%
75TH PERCENTILE (L75)
60% 60%
50TH PERCENTILE (L50) 40% 50TH PERCENTILE (L50)

40% WORK
46%
20% 20%
EDUCATION 0%
0%
36% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
DISTANCE IN KILOMETERS TIME IN MINUTES
WORK EDUCATION BUSINESS SHOPPING RECREATIONAL SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION BUSINESS SHOPPING RECREATIONAL SOCIAL

Household Travel
Characteristics
Presented By-
AMAN ULLAH 4.12
MODE 100.0
AUTO SHARED TWO 90.0

WALK CYCLE CAR BUS OTHER Grand
RICKSHAW AUTO WHEELER 80.0
Total
No % No % No % No % No % No % No % No % 70.0
WORK 28387 23.3% 11387 27.2% 8106 35.3% 12931 48.9% 142506 64.4% 13703 47.0% 1930 17.2% 772 40.0% 209722 60.0
PURPOSE
EDUCATION 66392 54.6% 27177 64.9% 9650 42.0% 9457 35.8% 48986 22.1% 1930 6.6% 7720 69.0% 0 0.0% 171312 50.0
BUSINESS 4439 3.7% 2316 5.5% 4053 17.6% 2509 9.5% 15633 7.1% 8106 27.8% 965 8.6% 1158 60.0% 39176 40.0
SHOPPING 5597 4.6% 193 0.5% 772 3.4% 1158 4.4% 7913 3.6% 4053 13.9% 386 3.4% 0 0.0% 20072 30.0
RECREATION 20.0
AL 6948 5.7% 193 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 193 0.1% 386 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7720 10.0
SOCIAL 3281 2.7% 579 1.4% 386 1.7% 386 1.5% 5597 2.5% 965 3.3% 193 1.7% 0 0.0% 11382 0.0
RELIGION 6562 5.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 579 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7141
Grand Total 121606 1 41845 1 22963 1 26443 1 221407 1 29143 1 11197 1 1930 1 489444
PURPOSE
WORK EDUCATION BUSINESS SHOPPING RECREATIONAL SOCIAL RELIGION Grand WORK EDUCATION
Total BUSINESS SHOPPING
No % No % No % No % No % No % No %
RECREATIONAL SOCIAL
WALK 28387 12.9% 66392 38.8% 4439 11.3% 5597 27.9% 6948 90.0% 3281 28.8% 6562 91.9% 121606
CYCLE 11387 5.2% 27177 15.9% 2316 5.9% 193 1.0% 193 2.5% 579 5.1% 0 0.0% 41845 100.0
AUTO 90.0
RICKSHAW 8106 3.7% 9650 5.6% 4053 10.3% 772 3.8% 0 0.0% 386 3.4% 0 0.0% 22963 80.0
MODE
SHARED 70.0
AUTO 12931 5.9% 9457 5.5% 2509 6.4% 1158 5.8% 0 0.0% 386 3.4% 0 0.0% 26443 60.0
TWO 50.0
WHEELER 142506 64.9% 48986 28.6% 15633 39.9% 7913 39.4% 193 2.5% 5597 49.2% 579 8.1% 221407 40.0
CAR 13703 6.2% 1930 1.1% 8106 20.7% 4053 20.2% 386 5.0% 965 8.5% 0 0.0% 29143 30.0
BUS 1930 0.9% 7720 4.5% 965 2.5% 386 1.9% 0 0.0% 193 1.7% 0 0.0% 11197 20.0
OTHER 772 0.4% 0 0.0% 1158 3.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1930 10.0
Grand Total 209722 1 171312 1 39176 1 20072 1 7720 1 11382 1 7141 1 489444 0.0
INFERENCES
• Work purpose being 46% of the total trips is mostly performed by Two wheeler mode.
• Education purpose being 36% of the total trips is mostly performed by Walk mode.
• Cycle mode with ATL of 1.94 is maximum used for the Education purpose.
• 90% of the Recreational Purpose is performed by walk, and Walk Mode is maximum for the Education purpose. WALK CYCLE
• 40% of the Business Purpose is performed by Two Wheeler mode, and Two wheeler mode being used for 45% of the total AUTO RICKSHAW SHARED AUTO
TWO WHEELER CAR
trips is maximum for the Work purpose. BUS OTHER

Household Travel
Characteristics
Presented By-
AMAN ULLAH 4.13
WARDWISE ANALYSIS – PER CAPITA TRIP RATE
INFERENCES
PCTR (OVERALL)-WARD WISE
PCTR (OVERALL)-WARD WISE
1. Highest PCTR attained is 0.85 .
2. The wards 1,4,5,6,7,8,10 which
lie just outside the core area
with relatively high population
density have PCTR of higher
range.
3. In the core area wards 11,12,33
have high PCTR.
4. Whereas wards with large
amount of unemployed and
retired population that lie mostly
in the outward area of the city
have low PCTR.
5. Highest count of vehicular trips
in the wards just outside the
core area resulting in high
range of PCTR.
6. Wards with less number of HHs
with vehicle ownership have
lower range of PCTR
PCTR
OVERALL 0.6
VEHICULAR TRIPS 0.43

HH TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS
Presented By-
Gauri Kshirsagar 4.14
WARDWISE ANALYSIS – NON-MOTORISED TRIPS
PERCENTAGE OF WALK PERCENTAGE OF CYCLE
TRIPS-WARD WISE TRIPS-WARD WISE
INFERENCES
Non- motorised trips count to around 36% of total trips out of which 75% are walk trips and the remaining 25% are cycle trips.
PERCENTAGE OF WALK TRIPS-WARD WISE PERCENTAGE OF CYCLE TRIPS-WARD WISE

1. Highest number of walk trips are mostly for education purpose. 1. The cycle trips are made by industrial workers, labours and students.
2. 98% of these trips are made within the ward itself and very less 2. Average trip length observed from cycle trips is 2 Km.
percentage the remaining 2% of trips are made in different wards. 3. 95% trips are made from one ward to another and 5% are made
3. Most of these trips are made by students and labours. within the ward itself.
4. Walk trips have an average trip length of 1.2 Km

Presented By-
Gauri Kshirsagar 4.14a
WARDWISE ANALYSIS – MOTORISED TRIPS (PRIVATE MODE)
PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF
2-WHEELER TRIPS- CAR TRIPS-
WARD WISE WARD WISE
INFERENCES
Out of the total trips private mode trips count to around 51% out of which trips made by 2 wheeler are the highest of all i.e. 89% and 11% by car.
PERCENTAGE OF 2-WHEELER TRIPS-WARD WISE PERCENTAGE OF CAR TRIPS-WARD WISE
1. Highest number of walk trips are mostly for education purpose. 1. The cycle trips are made by industrial workers, labours and students.
2. 98% of these trips are made within the ward itself and very less 2. Average trip length observed from cycle trips is 2 Km.
percentage the remaining 2% of trips are made in different wards. 3. 95% trips are made from one ward to another and 5% are made
3. Most of these trips are made by students and labours. within the ward itself.
4. Walk trips have an average trip length of 1.2 Km

Presented By-
Gauri Kshirsagar 4.14b
WARDWISE ANALYSIS – MOTORISED TRIPS (IPT and PT)
PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE OF
OF IPT TRIPS- INTERCITY BUS
WARD WISE TRIPS-WARD WISE
INFERENCES
Out of the total trips Intermediate public transport (IPT) mode trips count to around 12% and 3% trips are made by Intercity bus.
PERCENTAGE OF IPT & PT TRIPS-WARD WISE
1. Wards with highest range of IPT trips percentage are those with less number of HHs with vehicle ownership.
2. More than 50% of IPT trips are made in shared rickshaw. Maximum of these trips are for educational purpose.
3. Rest IPT trips are made by rickshaw carrying single passenger. These are used mainly for work purpose.

Presented By-
Gauri Kshirsagar 4.14c
WARDWISE ANALYSIS – PURPOSEWISE (WORK, EDUCATION & OTHER)
PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF
WORK TRIPS- EDUCATION TRIPS-
WARD WISE WARD WISE
PERCENTAGE OF INFERENCES
OTHER PURPOSE
Out of the total trips work trips are of highest percentage i.e. 46% followed by
TRIPS-WARD
education trips that are around 36%.
WISE
PERCENTAGE OF WORK TRIPS-WARD WISE
1. Wards with highest range of work trips percentage are 6, 2, 10, 8 and 50.
2. These wards have high percentage of working class mainly in private,
government and industrial sector.
PERCENTAGE OF EDUCATION TRIPS-WARD WISE

1. Education trips are in highest range of percentage in core area wards.
2. As almost 100% of trips are made within the wards, The trips are mainly
concentrated in wards having relatively large number of educational
institutes.

Presented By-
Gauri Kshirsagar 4.14d
WARDWISE ANALYSIS – AVERAGE TRIP LENGTH, TIME & COST
AVERAGE TRIP LENGTH- AVERAGE TRIP COST-
WARD WISE WARD WISE
AVERAGE TRIP TIME- INFERENCES

WARD WISE Average trip length
• The outer zone has highest ATL for each of the purposes as compared to other
zones.
• The average trip length of the study area is 3.69km.
Average trip time
• The northen zone has highest ATT for each of the purposes as compared to
other zones.
• ATT is higher in wards towards the eastern side of the railway station. However,
the relatively older part of the city, the western part showcases comparatively
less ATT. This can be attributed to the proximity to the core area as well as the
institutional area of the city. Average trip time for IPT is 17 mins 30 seconds and
that for private mode trips is 17 mins 56 seconds.
Average trip cost
• The outer zone has highest ATC for each of the purposes as compared to other
zones.
• The trips cost was calculated for IPT which came out to be 26.88rs and 58.22 rs
for private mode.
Presented By-
DESIRE LINE DIAGRAM – OVERALL TRIPS
Legend
DESIRE LINE DIGRAM – 2-WHEELER
Overall Trips
TOTAL TRIPS BY 2-WHEELER 1 - 500
501 - 1500
2,07,395
1501 - 3000
3001 - 4500
4501 - 5555
Study Area Boundary
Municipal Area Boundary
TAZs
TAZs
INFERENCES
• High number of potential
O-D zones lie in the central
part of the city, since it has
high number of
commercial zones.
• Out of the municipal area
boundary, trips are
observed to be attracted
to the ward 69 that has
Bichhwal industrial area.
• These trips are produced in
the wards 1, 2, 59, 58 which
have high population of
worker class.

Presented By-
DESIRE LINE DIAGRAM – TRIPS BY 2-WHEELER
DESIRE LINE DIGRAM – 2-WHEELER
Legend
TOTAL TRIPS BY 2-WHEELER TRIPS BY
2W_DesireLine
2,07,395 2-WHEELER
2WTRIPS
1801 - 3071
1001 - 1800
601 - 1000
301 - 600
1 - 300
66
Census ward boundary
Village boundary
LANDUSE
INFERENCES
AGR
• 2-wheeler trips have

AA
highest share of
AGR
percentage by of trips by
C
mode.
CIR
• High number of potential
I
O-D zones lie in the central
MU
part of the city, since it has
PSP
high number of
R
commercial zones.
REC
U
4.16a
Presented By- U_AA
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi HH TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS Gauri Kshirsagar
Master in Transport Planning, 2nd Semester U_AGR
VL
DESIRE LINE DIAGRAM – TRIPS BY 4-WHEELER
DESIRE LINE DIGRAM – 4-WHEELER Legend
TOTAL TRIPS BY 4-WHEELER
31,474 TRIPS BY
4W_DesireLine
4-WHEELER
TOTAL4WTRIPS
3001 - 4500
701 - 3000
451 - 700
201 - 450
85
1 - 200

Village boundary
LANDUSE
INFERENCES
AGR
• Trips by 4-wheeler are
observed to be
generated
AA mostly from
the eastern part of the
city AGR
attributing to high
percentage
C of HIG
population in these
CIR
areas.
• Also,I potential O-D
zones lie in the eastern
partMU of the city due to
presence
PSP of high
number of PSP
R
buildings.
REC
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043 U

Presented By-
Gauri Kshirsagar 4.16b
U_AA
U_AGR
DESIRE LINE DIAGRAM – TRIPS FOR WORK PURPOSE
DESIRE LINE DIGRAM – WORK TRIPS Legend
TOTAL WORK TRIPS TRIPS FOR WORK
WORK_DesireLines
1,68,976 PURPOSE
WORK_TRIPS
2001 - 3455
AVERAGE TRIP 1001 - 2000
LENGTH 601 - 1000
4 KM 301 - 600
66
1 - 300
Village boundary
LANDUSE
INFERENCES
AGR
• Core are has maximum
commercial centres and
hence AA has more trips
attracted as well as
AGR
generated.
C
• High number
CIR of trips are
observed to be generated in
I
the central part of the city.
MU
• Wards 6, 2,
PSP 10, 8, 50 have high
percentage of working class
mainly Rin private, government
and industrial
REC sector hence
producing high number of
U
work trips.
U_AA
U_AGR
Presented By-
Gauri Kshirsagar 4.16c
VL
VLI
DESIRE LINE DIAGRAM – TRIPS FOR EDUCATION PURPOSE
DESIRE LINE DIGRAM – EDUCATION TRIPS
Legend
TOTAL EDUCATION TRIPS
TRIPS FOR
EDUCATION_DesireLine
1,59,609
EDUCATION PURPOSE
EDUCATIONTRIPS
AVERAGE TRIP 1701 - 2752
LENGTH 1001 - 1700

601 - 1000
2 KM
301 - 600
1 - 300
66
Village boundary
LANDUSE
INFERENCES
AGR
• High number of
education
AA trips are of
short
AGR distances the
mode for which mostly
C
used is by walk.
CIR
• Ward
I 38 having high
number
MU of educational
institutes is one the
PSP
wards with potential O-
D zones.
R
REC
U
U_AA
U_AGR
VL
Presented By-
4.16d
VLI
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi HH TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS Gauri Kshirsagar
Master in Transport Planning, 2nd Semester VL_AA
VL_AGR

Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan

Existing Expressway
National Highway
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
5. LAND USE AND ESTABLISHMENT Railway

Jodhpur
Jaipur
Ratangarh
251
350
134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27

Rajasthan
-
Rajasthan
Bikaner District

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1
ESTABLISHMENTS
Establishments INPUT – From the Survey OUTPUT
• Trips attracted typology wise • Major mode of travel : Employees and Visitors
Refers to all built land uses which form the trip Typology wise Built Up Area calculation
• • Number of visitor/ sq. m.
attraction ends: Trip attraction per 100 sq.m. of built-up area for employees
• • Employee/ sq. m.
Commercial and visitors • Trip Attraction Rate (Establishment and ward wise)
Industrial % of motorized trips of total trips by employees and visitors
• • Parking availability in establishments
Public Semi Public Regression analysis for trip attraction and no. of employees
• • Employment Generation Rate
Establishment Survey land use wise
Establishment Survey is conducted to understand the Attraction Rate Estimation Landuse wise
establishment characteristics of a city, which helps in NO. OF EMPLOYEES/ VISITORS / EMPLOYEES +
calculating total attracted trips for horizon year SAMPLES AREA (SQ. M.) NO. OF VISITORS
EMPLOYEES 100 SQ. M. 100 SQ. M. VISITORS/100 SQ. M.
Total number of samples = 415 COMMERCIAL 340 43039.73 1740.00 12409.00 4.04 28.83 32.87
INDUSTRIAL 43 54192.09 1232.00 576.00 2.27 1.06 3.34
Establishment Sample Collected – Landuse wise
PUBLIC AND
32
SEMI PUBLIC 189401.50 447.00 6976.00 0.24 3.68 3.92
8%
Attraction Rate Estimation Landuse Sub-typology wise
9% Commercial
SAMPLES EMPLOYEES+
Industrial AREA NO. OF NO. OF EMPLOYEES VISITORS /
CATEGORY FROM EACH SUB-CATEGORY SAMPLES VISITORS/100
(SQ. M.) EMPLOYEES VISITORS /100 SQ. M. 100 SQ. M.
CATEGORY SQ. M.
Public and Semi
Public
Hotel and Restaurant 31 1356.60 113.00 3590.00 8.33 264.63 272.96
83%
Mall/ Shopping
8
Complex
4069.08 184.00 515.00 4.52 12.66 17.18
Parking Rates COMMERCIAL 340
Retail 284 21666.65 1323.00 8236.00 6.11 38.01 44.12
Warehouse 2 13644.09 6.00 38.00 0.04 0.28 0.32
Parking Rate
Area (in Access Vehicles ECS per 100 Wholesale 15
Landuse
sq. m.) Modes Attracted
per 100 sq.
sq. m.
2303.31 114.00 30.00 4.95 1.30 6.25
m.
Automobile 3 111.92 38.00 55.00 33.95 49.14 83.10
Construction 10 1486.89 87.00 42.00 5.85 2.82 8.68
Car 1048.98 2.00 2.00
INDUSTRY 43 Food Processing 4 2997.77 590.00 55.00 19.68 1.83 21.52
Commercial 52441.2 2W 6147.50 11.72 2.93
Manufacturing 16 47731.70 401.00 204.00 0.84 0.43 1.27
Cycle 2317.51 4.42 0.44
Servicing 10 1863.81 116.00 220.00 6.22 11.80 18.03
Car 89.39 0.14 0.14
Banks 7 348.24 58.00 417.00 16.65 119.74 136.40
Industrial 62978.9 2W 1013.08 1.61 0.40
Cycle 268.17 0.43
Govt./ Private Office 3 5085.39 125.00 172.00 2.46 3.38 5.84
0.04
PUBLIC AND Hospital 10
Car 799.29 0.18 32 69804.22 87.00 457.00 0.12 0.65 0.78
0.18 SEMI PUBLIC
Public Semi 110070.7
440159.8 2W 3063.96 0.70 0.17 Schools and Colleges 5
Public 6 145.00 5090.00 0.13 4.62 4.76
Cycle 399.65 0.09 0.01 Socio-cultural 7 4092.89 32.00 840.00 0.78 20.52 21.31
5.4
Presented By-
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Establishments Swapnil Mishra
ESTABLISHMENTS
PARKING - Employees PARKING - Visitors ACCESS MODE - Employee ACCESS MODE - Visitors
19% 12%
Access Mode Access Mode
81%
88%
Off-street On-street Off-street On-street
PARKING – Employees (Landuse wise)

% Share of type of parking
58.54 % 75 %
73.56 %
ACCESS MODE – Employee – Landuse wise ACCESS MODE – Visitors – Landuse wise
41.46 % 25 %
26.44 % Cumulative Percentage Share of Modes
Cumulative Percentage Share of Modes

Landuse
Percentage share of off-street parking is higher in each
landuse and the off-street share is higher in case of industrial landuse
PARKING – Visitors (Landuse wise)

% Share of type of parking
76.47 % 88.38 %
90.91 %
23.53 % 11.62 %
9.09 %
Landuse Landuse
Landuse 25% of share is of non motorized vehicles in each landuse, moreover 2W 25% of share is of non motorized vehicles in each landuse, moreover 2W
percentage is more than half in industrial landuse percentage is one third in industrial landuse
5.5
Presented By-
TOTAL AREA OF ESTABLISHMENTS AND TOTAL ATTRACTIONS
PSP BU
Industrial BU Commercial BU Area PSP Industrial Commercial PSP BU Area Industrial BU Commercial BU PSP Industrial Commercial
Ward No. Area (sq. Total Attraction Ward No. Total Attraction
Area (sq. m.) (sq. m.) Attraction Attraction Attraction (sq. m.) Area (sq. m.) Area (sq. m.) Attraction Attraction Attraction
m.)
1 333854.6 313026.4 72915.2 4516.83 7080.67 17544.70 34345 41 37013.0 0.0 12407.1 500.76 0.00 2985.36 2899
2 76218.9 0.0 23718.7 1031.19 0.00 5707.15 5704
42 8837.6 0.0 19918.1 119.57 0.00 4792.65 3161
3 3350.1 0.0 27427.4 8.23 0.00 0.00 4092
43 92985.5 0.0 55610.9 1258.03 0.00 13380.97 10842
4 12984.6 0.0 4501.0 175.67 0.00 0.00 1039
44 631268.7 0.0 0.0 8540.65 0.00 0.00 18646
5 67730.7 0.0 0.0 916.35 0.00 0.00 2001
6 24790.9 0.0 20761.4 335.40 0.00 0.00 3755 45 624684.9 565035.9 320.5 8451.58 12781.14 77.11 43533
7 12002.1 0.0 21717.6 162.38 0.00 0.00 3516 46 37194.2 0.0 355816.1 503.21 0.00 85615.66 52898
8 7604.3 0.0 13022.2 102.88 0.00 0.00 2120 47 6408.7 0.0 11093.9 15.84 0.00 0.00 1804
9 22685.0 0.0 2523.9 306.91 0.00 0.00 1037 48 12258.5 0.0 6725.1 165.85 0.00 0.00 1341
10 23551.6 0.0 3504.8 318.64 0.00 0.00 1206 49 298.2 0.0 22452.6 20.33 0.00 0.00 3277
11 0.0 0.0 1654.3 0.00 0.00 126.39 241
50 74748.9 0.0 0.0 1011.30 0.00 0.00 2208
12 49108.6 0.0 29363.7 664.41 0.00 7065.43 5725
51 197330.4 0.0 2984.3 2669.75 0.00 718.08 6263
13 2265.0 0.0 9761.3 0.69 0.00 0.00 1488
14 890.4 0.0 14896.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 52 16876.4 0.0 24794.4 228.33 0.00 5965.98 4108
2195
15 1195.2 0.0 19121.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 2819 53 1942.5 0.0 44936.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 6599
16 0.0 0.0 21890.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 3187 54 129205.2 0.0 2453.1 1748.06 0.00 590.25 4174
17 941.5 0.0 16700.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 2459 55 16811.5 0.0 3719.4 227.45 0.00 0.00 1038
18 5168.5 0.0 5278.7 69.93 0.00 0.00 921 56 24840.1 0.0 4815.8 336.07 0.00 0.00 1435
19 7424.2 0.0 8643.3 100.44 0.00 0.00 1478
57 14078.8 0.0 1892.6 190.48 0.00 1.73 691
20 0.0 0.0 8245.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1200
58 784.3 78714.3 0.0 10.61 5130.21 0.00 3511
21 0.0 0.0 15458.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 2250
59 40491.5 111875.9 0.0 547.82 7555.18 0.00 6153
22 11375.9 0.0 14436.2 153.91 0.00 0.00 2438
23 13481.9 0.0 5358.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 1178 60 34633.2 168275.5 19918.1 468.56 15530.32 4792.65 11378
24 23055.5 0.0 0.0 311.93 0.00 0.00 681 61 3813.2 0.0 111501.5 152.53 0.00 4460.06 16345
25 82687.7 362825.7 2157.3 1118.71 8207.13 519.09 18832 62 30457.7 369772.1 61402.4 1218.31 14790.88 2456.10 26222
26 48695.7 263044.7 29066.4 658.82 5950.08 6993.89 17324 63 485105.1 0.0 1235.5 19404.20 0.00 49.42 14509
27 9822.0 17122.5 13390.5 132.88 387.31 3222.00 2998 64 10217.9 0.0 105200.2 408.72 0.00 4208.01 15617
28 9828.0 0.0 22507.9 132.97 0.00 0.00 3567
65 12334.8 20369.5 15359.0 493.39 814.78 614.36 3503
29 8774.1 8069.7 21891.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 3804
66 2347.8 257126.9 0.0 93.91 10285.08 0.00 11462
30 3341.8 0.0 19756.0 25.52 0.00 0.00 2975
67 36.4 0.0 2599.2 1.46 0.00 103.97 379
31 0.0 0.0 19157.3 0.00 0.00 263.07 2789
32 365.2 0.0 1706.1 5.26 0.00 0.00 259 68 3732.1 0.0 2540.4 149.28 0.00 101.62 480
33 10095.2 0.0 18625.8 136.58 0.00 4481.69 3010 69 2493.3 35234.1 9171.7 99.73 1409.36 366.87 2970
34 12727.1 0.0 31390.2 172.19 0.00 7553.03 4946 70 9508.9 6171.7 3446.6 380.36 246.87 137.86 1056
35 1085.9 0.0 52732.4 14.69 0.00 12688.36 7709 71 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
36 99502.7 807.9 0.0 1346.21 18.28 0.00 2975
72 8393.7 0.0 2139.0 335.75 0.00 85.56 559
37 100342.1 0.0 65950.7 1357.56 0.00 15868.91 12565
73 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
38 1023909.9 0.0 19629.6 13852.83 0.00 4723.24 33102
39 176988.4 0.0 0.0 2394.54 0.00 0.00 5228 74 3578.6 0.0 2685.3 143.14 0.00 107.41 497
40 24672.4 0.0 0.0 333.80 0.00 0.00 729 Total Attractions 4,89,444
5.6
Presented By-
LOCATION OF ESTABLISHMENTS
North Bichhwal
1 Industrial Area
West Bichhwal
2 Industrial Area
3 Vyas Colony
1 4 Panchsati Circle
5 Phad Bazaar
2
10
6 Core Area Market
3
4 7 Rani Bazaar
6 5 9
South Industrial
7 8 Area
8
9 Khajanchi Market
Antyodaya
10 Nagar
Source- Reconnaissance
Survey
Location of establishments in Bikaner
A total of 400 samples were collected from establishments to assess the internal freight
movement in the city of Bikaner. The mode wise freight movement was captured for which
freight vehicle origin and destination survey was undertaken with a total sample size of 200.
LAND USE MAP 2023- BIKANER

Location of major establishments in Bikaner
LANDUSE DISTRIBUTION
North Bichhwal
1 Industrial Area 2 West Bichhwal
Industrial Area Residential 22.0%
Wholesale markets Commercial 3.6%
Krishi Upaz Mandi, Antyodaya Nagar, TATA Automobile servicing Industry, Bichhwal Dairy Industry, Bichhwal 3 Wholesale Market,
Pugal Road
4 Antyodaya Nagar Public-Semi Public 11.7%
Bikaner Industrial Area Industrial Area
Industrial 15.3%
5 Core Area, Bikaner 6 South Industrial Area
Mixed Use - 4.0%
Commercial Area, Transport Nagar, Public Utilities 3.0%
7 (Khajanchi market, Rani 8 Bichhwal Rural area, Transportation 10.3%
Bazaar, Panchsati Bikaner
circle) Agricultural 16.6%
Source- Establishment Survey, Comprehensive Mobility Plan, 2043 Source- Land use survey, Bikaner, CMP Bikaner 2043
• The area under commercial land use comprises of 3.60% of the overall area of the study area. The major
commercial establishments i.e., Mandis, shopping malls, commercial markets are located on the northern
Anaj Mandi, Bichhwal Rural Area Manufacturing Industry, Bichhwal Industrial Transport Nagar, Bichhwal Rural part of the city. There are various wholesale markets and Mandis located in Antyodaya Nagar.
Area Area, Bikaner
Fig: Commercial and Industrial establishments, Freight Terminal in the city of Bikaner • The Industrial land use comprises 15.3% of the overall study area. The industries are located in the northern
and southern parts of the city. Bichhwal area has a major portion of the land under industrial land uses.
Transport Nagar of Bikaner city is the only freight terminal located in the northern part of the city near Bichhwal
Industrial area. The freight terminal is located along the Suratgarh-Bikaner road and has a total area of 22.7
• There are various wholesale markets located along the Pugal Road. Khajanchi market, Phad Bazaar and
Hectares.
Rani Bazaar are the major commercial areas in the city of Bikaner.

FREIGHT MOVEMENT – INTERNAL TO
INTERNAL
SAYEED ANWAR
SPA/NS/TP/749 5.7
TYPE AND SIZES OF ESTABLISHMENTS
Type Percentage
Type of commercial establishments Average size of commercial establishments
Medical store 3.61%
General Store 19.02% 400.00
Medical store 350.00
Plot Size in Sq.m

General Store Milk Booths 1.31%
2% 2% 4% Fruit and Vegetable 300.00
Milk Booths 250.00
3% 5% Fruit and Vegetable shop shop 1.64%
4% Food court Food court 1.64% 200.00
150.00
2% Restaurants Restaurants 10.16%
19% 100.00
Wholesale Markets Wholesale Markets 12.13%
50.00
Mandis Mandis 2.30%
1% Local Shopping center 0.00
Local Shopping center 3.93%
14% 2% Shopping Mall Shopping Mall 2.62%
2% Sweet Shop
Sweet Shop 1.97%
Stationary store
10% Jewellery store
Stationary store 2.62%
Cloth store Jewellery store 4.26%
4% Cloth store 14.43%
Automobile Repair shop
12%
3% Hardware Store Automobile Repair shop 1.64%
Electronics store Hardware Store 4.26%
2% 3% 2% Footwear store Electronics store 3.28% Type of establishments
Furniture store Footwear store 2.30%
4% Others Furniture store 1.97% Average size of Industrial establishments
Others 4.92%
500.00
Type Percentage 450.00
Type of Industrial Establishments
Plot size in sq.m

400.00
Manufacturing 26.67% 350.00
2% Manufacturing 300.00
4% Construction 4.17%
Construction 250.00
Chemical 1.67% 200.00
8% Chemical 150.00
4% Warehouse and 100.00
2% 27% Warehouse and Godowns Godowns 5.00% 50.00
Automobile 0.00
Automobile 8.33%
6% Food Processing Food Processing 29.17%
Wool Processing
Wool Processing 5.83%
4% Textile
Textile 1.67%
2% Dairy Industries
29% Dairy Industries 4.17% Type of establishments
5% Packaging Industries
8% Packaging Industries 7.50%
Oil Refinery
• The average size of plot areas for Mandis and shopping malls are more than 250
Oil Refinery 4.17%
Others sq.m
Others 1.67% • Medical stores, general stores, milk booths and various other commercial
establishments have average plot size of 50 sq.m or less.
• There are large number of wholesale markets and mandis located in Antyodaya Nagar in Bikaner • Mandis have average plot sizes of about 325 sq.m located majorly in Antyodaya
comprising fruits and vegetable wholesale, grains, ground nuts and oil seeds etc. Nagar
• Local shopping centres and automobile servicing centres have plot sizes about 50
• There are large number of food-processing industries located in Bichhwal industrial area in the city of sq.m.
Bikaner. • Food processing industries, wool processing industries and packaging industries
occupy more plot sizes in comparison to other industries such as dairy industries or
• The other major industries comprises of wool processing industries, oil refineries, manufacturing industries, textile industries.
automobile servicing and packaging industries etc. • Warehouses and godowns have average plot sizes of 350 sq.ms
• Oil refineries have average plot sizes of about 200 sq.m
• There is presence of warehouses and godowns in the vicinity of Bichhwal Industrial Area which are used for • Packaging industries have average plot sizes more than any other industries in the
storage of various industrial materials, raw materials etc. city of Bikaner
Source- Establishment Survey, CMP Bikaner 2043

INTERNAL
SAYEED ANWAR
SPA/NS/TP/749 5.8
TONNAGE GENERATION AND ATTRACTION
TONNAGE GENERATION FROM COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS TONNAGE GENERATION FROM INDUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS TONNAGE ATTRACTION TO COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS
LINEAR REGRESSION BETWEEN TONNAGE GENERATION AND BUILT-UP AREA LINEAR REGRESSION BETWEEN TONNAGE GENERATION AND BUILT-UP AREA OF LINEAR REGRESSION BETWEEN TONNAGE ATTRACTION AND BUILT-UP
OF ESTABLISHMENTS (COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS) ESTABLISHMENTS (INDSUTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS) AREA OF ESTABLISHMENTS (COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS)
Tonnage Generation = 0.0043*(Built up area of establishment) - 0.015 Tonnage Generation = 0.0047* (Built-up area of establishment) – 0.0276 Tonnage Attraction = 0.006* (Built up area of establishment) + 0.139
REGRESSION STATISTICS REGRESSION STATISTICS REGRESSION STATISTICS

Multiple R 0.97 Multiple R 0.95 Multiple R 0.90
R-square 0.95 R-square 0.91 R-square 0.82
Adjusted R-square 0.95 Adjusted R-square 0.91 Adjusted R-square 0.82
Standard Error 0.067 Standard Error 0.192 Standard Error 0.128
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value
Intercept -0.015104374 0.0043758 -3.4518 0.0006358 Intercept -0.02764 0.059343 -0.46584 0.64235 Intercept 0.013993 0.008702 1.608005 0.108889
Area 0.004278869 5.63894E-05 75.88074 1.29E-199 Area 0.004666 0.000149 31.23293 4.6E-53 Area 0.00566 0.000154 36.73651 7.3E-113
Tonnage generation and area of establishments Tonnage generation and area of establishments Tonnage attraction and area of establishments
3.00 4 2
Tonnage generated (Ton per

Tonnage generated (Ton per
Tonnage attracted per week ( Ton

Tonnage
3.5 Tonnage 1.8 y = 0.0057x + 0.014
2.50 generated y = 0.0047x - 0.0276 Tonnage
generated 1.6
y = 0.0043x - 0.0151 (Ton per 3 attracted per
(Ton per day)
2.00 day) 1.4 week ( Ton
2.5
day)
day)
1.2 per day)
per day)
1.50 2
Predicted Predicted 1
Tonnage 1.5 Tonnage 0.8 Predicted
1.00
generated generated Tonnage
1 0.6
(Ton per (Ton per day) attracted per
0.50 0.4
day) 0.5 week ( Ton
0.2 per day)
0.00 0
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 0 200 400 600 800
-0.50 0 100 200 300 400
Area (Built-up area of establishments in sq.m) Area (Built up area of establishments in sq.m)
Area (Built-up area of establishments in sq.m)
Mean value (Built-up area of establishments in sq.m) = 36.38 Mean value (Built-up area of establishments in sq.m) = 376.12 Mean value (Area of establishments in sq.m) = 30.02
From regression analysis between tonnage generation and size of From regression analysis between tonnage generation and size of From regression analysis between tonnage attraction and size of
establishments, the value of R-square is 0.95 which implies high correlation establishments, the value of R-square is 0.91 which implies high correlation establishments, the value of R-square is 0.82 which implies high correlation
between tonnage generation and sizes of commercial establishments. between tonnage generation and sizes of industrial establishments. between tonnage attraction and sizes of commercial establishments.
TONNAGE ATTRACTION TO INDUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS Tonnage attraction and area of establishments INFERENCES- REGRESSION ANALYSIS
6
Tonnage
Tonnage attracted per
LINEAR REGRESSION BETWEEN TONNAGE ATTRACTION AND BUILT-UP

5 y = 0.0051x + 0.5212
day ( Ton per day)
AREA OF ESTABLISHMENTS (INDUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS) attracted per • The high values of R-square i.e., 0.7-1.0 indicates the fitness of the
4 week ( Ton per model i.e., Goodness of fit. It is a measure of correlation between the
Tonnage Attraction = 0.0051* (Built-up area of establishment) + 0.521 week) parameters of the model.
3
REGRESSION STATISTICS 2 • The values of R-square for regression between tonnage
Predicted generation/attraction and sizes of establishments ranges between
Multiple R 0.72 1 Tonnage 0.62-0.95 which shows a significant correlation between these two
R-square 0.62 0 attracted per parameters. The R-square values are known as coefficient of
Adjusted R-square 0.61 0 200 400 600 800 week ( Ton per determination which is an indicator of the “Goodness of fit”.
week)
Standard Error 0.647 Area (Built-up area of establishments in sq.m) • The standard error shows the measure of variation between the
predicted and the actual values of the model parameters.
Standard Mean value (Built-up of establishments in sq.m) = 374.78
Coefficients Error t Stat P-value From regression analysis between tonnage attraction and size of establishments, • The P-value gives the measure of significance for the coefficients of
Intercept 0.521209 0.208544 2.499282 0.014345 the value of R-square is 0.62 which implies moderate correlation between the variable included in the model.
Area 0.005088 0.000525 9.689381 1.95E-15 tonnage attraction and sizes of industrial establishments.

INTERNAL
SAYEED ANWAR
SPA/NS/TP/749 5.9
TONNAGE GENERATION AND ATTRACTION
TONNAGE GENERATION FROM COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS TONNAGE GENERATION FROM INDUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS
MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION BETWEEN TONNAGE GENERATION AS DEPENDENT VARIABLE (Y) AND SIZE OF MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION BETWEEN TONNAGE GENERATION AS DEPENDENT VARIABLE (Y) AND SIZE OF
ESTABLISHMENTS AND NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES AS INDEPENDENT VARIABLE (X) (COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS) ESTABLISHMENTS AND NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES AS INDEPENDENT VARIABLE (X) (INDUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS)
Tonnage Generation = 0.003 * (Size of Establishments) + 0.01 * (Number of employees) – 0.0309 Tonnage Generation = 1.62* (Size of Establishments) + 0.039* (Number of employees) – 0.364
REGRESSION STATISTICS Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value REGRESSION STATISTICS Standard
Multiple R 0.91 Multiple R 0.93 Coefficients Error t Stat P-value
Intercept -0.03087 0.006431 -4.80066 2.49E-06
Intercept -0.36457 0.058152 -6.26926 9.78E-09
R-square 0.92 Area 0.003308 0.000156 21.25135 5.42E-62 R-square 0.92
Area 0.002484 0.000239 10.39313 1.7E-17
Adjusted R-square 0.92 Number of Adjusted R-square 0.92 Number of
Standard Error 0.056 employees 0.01021 0.002249 4.540329 8.11E-06 Standard Error 0.146 employees 0.03907 0.003812 10.24812 3.5E-17
Tonnage generation and area of establishments Tonnage generation and area of establishments Tonnage generation and number of employees
Tonnage generation and number of employees
2.5 4.5 4.5
2.5 Tonnage Tonnage Tonnage
Tonnage generated ( Ton per

Tonnage
4

generate 4
generated ( y = 0.0739x - 0.4859 generated (

2 generated (
2 d ( Ton 3.5 Ton per day) 3.5 Ton per day)
Ton per day)
per day) y = 0.0046x + 0.0097
y = 0.0558x - 0.1271 3 3
1.5 y = 0.004x - 0.0068 1.5
2.5 2.5
day)
day)
Predicted Predicted
day)
day)
1 Predicted 1 Predicted 2 2
Tonnage Tonnage
Tonnage Tonnage 1.5 1.5 generated (
generated (
0.5 generate 0.5 generated ( 1 Ton per day)
Ton per day) 1
d ( Ton Ton per day)
0.5 0.5
0 per day) 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 0 0
0 10 20 30 40
-0.5 0 200 400 600 800 0 20 40 60 80
Area (Built-up area of establishments in sq.m) -0.5 Number of employees
Area (Built-up area of establishments in sq.m) Number of employees
The multiple linear regression analysis between tonnage generation as dependent variable and size of The multiple linear regression analysis between tonnage generation as dependent variable and size of establishments
establishments and number of employees as independent variables shows that the value of R-square is 0.92 which and number of employees as independent variables shows that the value of R-square is 0.92 which implies high
implies high correlation between these parameters. correlation between these parameters.
TONNAGE ATTRACTION TO COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS TONNAGE ATTRACTION TO INDUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS

MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION BETWEEN TONNAGE ATTRACTION AS DEPENDENT VARIABLE (Y) AND SIZE OF MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION BETWEEN TONNAGE ATTRACTION AS DEPENDENT VARIABLE (Y) AND SIZE OF
ESTABLISHMENTS AND NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES AS INDEPENDENT VARIABLE (X) (COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS) ESTABLISHMENTS AND NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES AS INDEPENDENT VARIABLE (X) (INDUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS)
Tonnage attraction = 0.007* (Size of establishment) + 0.206 * (Number of employees) – 0.805 Tonnage attraction = 0.001 *(Size of establishments) + 0.109 *(Number of employees) – 1.192
REGRESSION STATISTICS Standard REGRESSION STATISTICS Standard
Multiple R 0.85 Coefficients Error t Stat P-value Multiple R 0.86 Coefficients Error t Stat P-value
Intercept -0.80486 0.102417 -7.85861 6.83E-14 Intercept -1.19179 0.228101 -5.22484 1.06E-06
R-square 0.73 R-square 0.75
Area 0.007248 0.002479 2.923639 0.00372 Area 0.001325 0.000538 2.46309 0.015614
Adjusted R-square 0.72 Adjusted R-square 0.74
Number of Number of
Standard Error 0.898 employees 0.206249 0.035814 5.758878 2.08E-08 Standard Error 0.485 employees 0.10957 0.010653 10.28536 5.11E-17
Tonnage attraction and area of establishments Tonnage attraction and number of employees Tonnage attraction and area of establishments Tonnage attraction and number of employees
Tonnage 5 5
Tonnage attracted per day ( Ton
16 16
Tonnage attracted per day (Ton

attracted Tonnage y = 0.0051x + 0.5435
Tonnage attracted per day ( Ton
4.5 Tonnage 4.5 Tonnage
Tonnage attracted per day (Ton per day)

14 per day ( 14 attracted per attracted per attracted per
y = 0.0209x - 0.3193 4 day (Ton per 4 day (Ton per
12 Ton per day ( Ton per day) y = 0.1274x - 1.2122
12 day)
day) day) 3.5 3.5
10 10 Predicted
per day)
y = 0.3061x - 1.0158
per day)
3 3 Predicted
Tonnage
Tonnage
per day)
8 Predicted 8 2.5
attracted per
2.5 attracted per
Predicted day (Ton per
6 Tonnage day)
day (Ton per
6 Tonnage 2 2 day)
attracted Linear
4 4 attracted per 1.5 Linear
per day ( 1.5 (Predicted
(Predicted
day ( Ton per Tonnage
2 Ton per 2 1 attracted per 1 Tonnage
day) day (Ton per attracted per
day) 0.5 day)) 0.5 day (Ton per
0 0 day))
0
-2 0 200 400 600 -2 0 10 20 30 40 0
0 200 400 600 800 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Area (Built-up area of establishments in sq.m) Number of employees Area (Built-up area of establishments in sq.m) Number of employees
The multiple linear regression analysis between tonnage attraction as dependent variable and size of The multiple linear regression analysis between tonnage attraction as dependent variable and size of establishments
establishments and number of employees as independent variables shows that the value of R-square is 0.73 and number of employees as independent variables shows that the value of R-square is 0.75 which implies
which implies moderate correlation between these parameters. moderate correlation between these parameters.

INTERNAL
SAYEED ANWAR
SPA/NS/TP/749 5.10
ZONE WISE TONNAGE GENERATION AND ATTRACTION
TONNAGE GENERATION FROM COMMERCIAL TONNAGE GENERATION FROM INDUSTRIAL
ESTABLISHMENTS ESTABLISHMENTS TOTAL TONNAGE GENERATION/ATTRACTION
TOTAL TONNAGE GENERATION (2023)
Tonnage Generation (Commercial) 11,580 tons
Tonnage Generation (Industrial) 28,297 tons
Key
Key map
map
Key map Total Tonnage Generation 39,877 tons
TOTAL TONNAGE ATTRACTION (2023)

Tonnage attraction (Commercial) 10,588 tons
Tonnage attraction (Industrial) 31,460 tons
Total Tonnage attraction 42,048 tons
1 2
TONNAGE ATTRACTION TO COMMERCIAL TONNAGE ATTRACTION TO INDUSTRIAL

ESTABLISHMENTS ESTABLISHMENTS
4 5
1. Krishi Upaz Mandi, Bichhwal Rural area Major Industries

2. Anaj Mandi, Bichhwal Rural area and commercial
Key map 3. Packaging Industries, Bichhwal Industrial area
Key map 4. Panchsati circle commercial market markets in the city
5. Manufacturing Industry, Bichhwal Industrial area of Bikaner
INFERENCES
• The major tonnage generators are the industrial areas such as
Bichhwal Industrial area (Zone- 25, 45) areas comprising wholesale
markets and Mandis (Zone- 1, 45, 69)
• The major tonnage attractors are Industrial areas and areas

comprising wholesale markets and Mandis (Zone- 1,25,26, 45, 46, 58,
59, 60, 62, 69)
• The total tonnage generated from the study area is 39,877 tons and
total tonnage attracted to the study area is 42,048 tons.
• The core area generates and attracts a significant portion of freight

trips as anaj mandis and commercial markets are located in the core
area.
• The tonnage generating from industrial areas, mandis and wholesale

markets are also attracted to the core area and other establishments
of the city.

INTERNAL
SAYEED ANWAR
SPA/NS/TP/749 5.11
DISTRIBUTION OF FREIGHT TRIPS (INTERNAL TO INTERNAL)
OD MATRIX FOR INTERNAL TO INTERNAL FREIGHT TRIPS (2023) DESIRE LINE DIAGRAM SHOWING DISTRIBUTION OF FREIGHT TRIPS(INTERNAL TO INTERNAL)
Row Grand
Labels 1 2 11 12 25 26 27 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 41 42 43 45 46 49 51 52 54 58 59 60 Total
1 63 5 1 6 55 46 5 1 4 7 11 1 14 4 3 4 12 85 77 1 5 1 34 50 107 604
2 4 1 1 1 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 5 1 1 1 2 3 7 52
11 1 1 2
12 5 1 1 1 5 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 6 1 1 1 3 4 9 59
25 58 5 1 6 51 42 5 2 4 6 11 2 13 4 3 4 11 78 71 1 5 1 31 46 99 560
26 47 4 2 5 41 34 4 2 3 5 9 1 11 3 2 3 9 63 58 1 4 1 25 37 80 455
27 5 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 6 1 1 1 3 4 9 58
31 1 1 2
33 3 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 4 1 1 1 2 3 6 43
34 6 1 1 1 5 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 7 1 1 1 3 4 10 63
35 9 1 1 1 8 7 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 13 12 1 1 1 5 7 16 95
36 1 1
37 12 1 1 1 10 9 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 16 14 1 1 1 6 9 20 118
38 4 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 4 1 1 1 2 3 6 45
41 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 2 4 35
42 4 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 4 1 1 1 2 3 6 45
43 10 1 1 1 9 7 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 13 12 1 1 1 5 8 17 100
44 1 1 2
45 90 7 1 9 79 65 8 1 6 10 16 1 20 6 4 6 17 121 110 1 8 1 49 72 154 862
46 63 5 1 6 55 46 6 1 4 7 12 1 14 4 3 4 12 86 78 1 5 1 34 51 108 610
51 2 2 1 5
52 4 1 1 1 4 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 6 5 1 1 1 2 3 7 56
54 2 1 1 4
58 36 3 1 4 32 26 3 1 2 4 7 1 8 2 2 2 7 49 44 1 3 1 20 29 62 350
59 53 4 1 5 46 39 5 1 3 6 10 1 12 4 2 4 10 72 65 1 5 1 29 42 91 511
60 113 9 0 11 99 82 10 0 7 12 21 0 26 8 5 8 22 152 138 1 10 1 61 90 193 1078

Grand
Total 593 56 20 64 520 432 58 22 45 71 111 22 135 47 34 47 114 799 726 1 18 57 18 321 472 1011 5815
INFERENCES
• The desire line diagram shows that the maximum freight trips are generating from Industrial
areas and areas comprising wholesale markets and Mandis in Antyodaya Nagar.
• The freight trips which are generating from industries and wholesale markets and mandis are
being attracted towards the core area where commercial markets and mandis are located.
• There are significant amount of freight trips which are generating and attracting between the
industrial areas of the city.
• A major portion of the trips are generating and attracting between the whole sale markets,
mandis located in Antyodaya Nagar and mandis located in the core area of the city.
COMMODITY TYPE FREQUENCY OF TRIPS TYPE OF MODE USED

2% 3% LCV 70% of the freight trips
Consumer Daily trips are 4%
5% Food Grains
5% Daily 7% are made by LCVs
items is the maximum i.e., 12% 3% 2-Axle truck
23% Fruits and Vegetables followed by 3-axle trucks
major 12% 43% followed by
Milk and Milk Products 3-Axle truck i.e., 9%. 7% of freight trips
commodity 4% weekly trips. i.e., 43% Weekly
9%
Consumer items are made by animal
transported 40%. 12% of trips E-Rickshaw
Oil and Gas (commodity) carts i.e., majorly camel
with 31% 14% are monthly Monthly
4%
Industrial materials Multi axle truck carts and bullock carts.
followed by trips. Only 5% of 70%
31% Building materials 40% MAVs comprise 4% of
food grains freight trips are Animal carts
9% Others Yearly overall freight trips.
23%. yearly trips Others

INTERNAL
SAYEED ANWAR
SPA/NS/TP/749 5.12

Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan

Existing Expressway
National Highway
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
6.OUTER CORDON TRAVEL CHARATERISTICS Railway

Jodhpur
Jaipur
Ratangarh
251
350
134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27

Rajasthan
-
Rajasthan
Bikaner District

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1
Outer Cordon Point Locations
TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNT SURVEY LIMITATIONS
Traffic Characteristics consists of : Speed, Volume and Traffic composition. Classified Traffic •Survey on outer cordons was done on 16th February 2023.
Volume count was carried out at: •Survey at outer cordons was done for 12 Hours and for mid block and screen line points the
Outer Cordon, Screen Line points and Mid Blocks duration was 12 hours 30 minutes.
Legend EXPECTED OUTCOMES
1 Outer Cordon Point 1. Total traffic

Location
2. Peak hour characteristics
• Peak hour volume
• Peak hour time
• Peak hour share
1
3. Traffic composition
• Vehicular composition
• Classification of traffic
(passenger vehicles vs
4
goods vehicles)
• Hourly variation
4. Directional distribution
2 • Directional split
5 5. Volume capacity ratios
and LOS
Cordon Type of Date &

Location Duration
Point Carriageway Time
Near Shankla Hotel,
Bichwal Plant,
OC1
Suratgarh- Bikaner 2 Lane
Road(NH 62) Undivided 12 Hours
Near Shangwa
OC2 Restaurent, Jaipur Road 4 Lane
(NH 11) Undivided 12 Hours 16th
Near HP Petrolpump Feb
3 OC3 ,Udai Ramsar, Bikaner - 4 Lane (7:00
Barmer Road (NH 62) Divided 12 Hours am to
Near Rajbhog Resort, 7:00
OC4 suratgarh -chattargarh- 2 Lane pm)
bikaner road (SH 3) Undivided 12 Hours
Reliance jio petrol
pump , Jaisalmer-
OC5
bikaner- kolayat Road 6 Lane
Map showing Outer Cordon Point Locations for CMP Bikaner (2043) (NH 11) Divided 12 Hours
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043 Submitted by:

EXTERNAL TRAFFIC
CHARATERISTCS
Swapnil Thorat
(SPA/NS/TP/754)
6.1 59
Outer Cordon Points- Traffic Volume and Modal Composition
Legend
Traffic Composition Outer Cordon-1 Outer Cordon Point
1% 2% 0% 0%
1 Location
Traffic Composition Outer Cordon-4 1%
16%
0% 2% 2%
0% 6% 30%
12%
1% 14% 7%
4%
9%
1 7%
6% 0%
10% 2%
3% 10%
18% 10% 2%
19%
0% Peak Hour: Peak Hour: 11:00

3% 2%
Peak Hour: 6:00- 12:30-1:30 PM -12:00 PM
4 7:00 PM
Peak Hour: Peak Hour: 6:30-
12:30-1:30 PM 7:30 PM
Peak Hour: 5:45-
6:45 PM
Peak Hour:
1:30-2:30 PM
744 PCU/hr
2
Peak Hour: 2:45-
3:45 PM 5
Legend
801 PCU/hr Traffic Composition Outer Cordon-2 Car LCV (Tata 407)
Traffic Composition Outer Cordon-5 2% 2% 0% 2%
1% 2% Taxi 2 Axle Truck
2% 10%
6% 7%
20% 31% Jeep/Van 3 Axle Truck
3% 8%
1%
2% Auto Rickshaw
4% MAV
8%
11%
11% Tractor
0% Two Wheeler
8% 12% 3%
6% 2%
20% Mini Bus Tractor + Trailer
2% 8%
1% Traffic Composition Outer Cordon-3 5% 1% Govt. Bus Cycle
1%
1% 3% 0%
3 Private Bus Animal drawn
Peak Hour: 14% 25%
10:30-11:30 AM Inference-
4% • Outer Cordon point 1 has higher traffic
4% 1% volume compared to others.
Peak Hour:
2%
10:45-11:45 AM 12% 7% • Outer Cordon point 5 has higher Peak
hour volume.
8% 12% • Outer Cordon Point 1 has has higher
goods traffic flow due to location of
5% 1%
Bichwaal industrial Area
Map showing Outer Cordon Point analysis for CMP Bikaner (2043)
EXTERNAL TRAFFIC
CHARATERISTCS
Swapnil Thorat
(SPA/NS/TP/754)
6.2 60
Hourly distribution and Mode wise split
LCV Inference-
Cordon Jeep/ Auto Two Mini Govt. Private 2 Axle Truck 3 Axle Truck Tractor + Animal
Car Taxi (Tata MAV Tractor Cycle
Point Van Rick. Wheeler Bus. Bus Bus (6 Wheeler) (10 Wheeler) Trailer Drawn • Cars have highest traffic share of 20%
407)
• Vehicle count at OC5 has higher
PCU Value 1 1 1 1 0.5 2 3 3 1.5 3 3 4.5 4.5 4.5 0.5 8
OC1 1051 61 140 361 445.5 28 123 174 662 696 678 1849.5 85.5 76.5 1 0 OUT
volume but PCU count at OC1 is high
1 that is 11968 PCU.
822 43 94 425 426.5 16 81 105 561 510 567 1705.5 27 144 0 8 IN
1873 104 234 786 872 44 204 279 1223 1206 1245 3555 112.5 220.5 1 8 11967 Total • OC1 has Highest % share of MAV due
OC2 1440 27 113 76 236 24 243 330 557 336 231 319.5 45 72 0 88 OUT to the connection of Bypass road to
2
1073 5 163 50 254.5 34 120 315 414 330 426 499.5 81 63 0.5 56 IN NH 62 and Bichwal Industrial area
2513 32 276 126 490.5 58 363 645 971 666 657 819 126 135 0.5 144 8022 Total influence.
OC3 1189 23 117 327 522 62 243 324 557 162 201 544.5 54 171 8 72
3
OUT • OC 4 has higher number of tractor +
1091 58 89 330 586 46 180 387 561 159 132 720 36 144 7.5 24 IN Trailers since construction activity is in
2280 81 206 657 1108 108 423 711 1118 321 333 1264.5 90 315 15.5 96 9127 Total progress.
OC4 429 5 255 372 616.5 20 96 102 780 51 219 153 9 580.5 9.5 160 OUT • OC3 and OC2 shows morning and
4
471 0 183 355 768 0 90 114 710 153 240 171 76.5 459 13 24 IN evening peak hour of 10am- 11am
900 5 438 727 1384.5 20 186 216 1490 204 459 324 85.5 1039.5 22.5 184 7685 Total
and 4pm- 5pm respectively.
OC5 1059 58 241 518 865 58 114 432 549 120 213 445.5 144 301.5 35 104 OUT
5 • Where as OC and OC2 shows
1038 72 187 600 1236.5 44 69 369 600 105 96 198 54 396 82 56 IN
2097 130 428 1118 2101.5 102 183 801 1149 225 309 643.5 198 697.5 117 160 10460 Total
afternoon peak hours from 1pm- 2pm
Total 9663 352 1582 3414 5956.5 332 1359 2652 5949 2622 3003 6606 612 2407.5 156.5 592 47259 and 2pm- 3pm.
Hourly Traffic Volume Count at cordon points Vehicle Composition at Each Cordon Point
7:00-8:00
1400 100% 8
1
220.5 144
0.5 96
15.5 184 160
112.5 135 315 22.5 117
126 90 697.5
18:00-19:00 8:00-9:00
1200 90% 819 1039.5 198
1264.5 643.5
1000 3555 85.5
80% 657 324 309
Peak Hour
333 225
459
% Share of vehicles Mode-wise

800 321
OC 4 666 1149
17:00-18:00 9:00-10:00 70% 204
600 1117.5
1245 970.5 801
60% 1489.5
400 711 183
102
50% 1206 645 423
200 Peak Hour 216
108 186
OC 3 363 20 2101.5
Peak Hour 58
16:00-17:00 0 10:00-11:00 40% 1222.5 1108
OC 2 490.5
279 126 1384.5
204
44 276 657
30% 32 1118
872 206
81
786 727 428
20% 130
234
104 2513 438
15:00-16:00 11:00-12:00 2280 5
10% 2097
1873
900
Peak Hour 0%
OC 2
OC1 OC2 OC3 OC4 OC5
14:00-15:00 Peak Hour 12:00-13:00 Outer Cordon points
Car Taxi Jeep / Van Auto rikshaw Two Wheeler Mini Bus Govt. Bus Private Bus
OC 1
13:00-14:00 LCV (TATA 407) 2 Axle truck 3 Axle truck MAV Tractor Trcator + Trailer Cycle Animal Drawn
OC1 OC2 OC3 OC4 OC5

EXTERNAL TRAFFIC
CHARATERISTCS
Swapnil Thorat
(SPA/NS/TP/754)
6.3 61
Expansion factor Case study
Expansion Factor from Solapur CMP (National Highways) EXPANSION OF TRAFFIC VOLUME:
Solapur selected as reference city for
3 Axle Truck
Two LCV/ (Tata 2 Axle Truck (10 Tractor + Animal the expansion of 12-hour traffic volume
Car Taxi Jeep/Van Auto Rick. Wheeler Mini Bus govt. bus private Bus 407) (6 Wheeler) Wheeler) MAV Tractor Trailer Cycle Drawn PCUs count of Bikaner into 16-hour count
Total 1051 61 140 361 446 28 123 174 662 696 678 1850 86 77 1 0 6432
based on following parameters.
PARAMETERS: City settlement pattern,
3 Axle Truck
Two LCV/ (Tata 2 Axle Truck (10 Tractor + Animal
climate and economic base of cities
Car Taxi Jeep/Van Auto Rick. Wheeler Mini Bus Govt. Bus Private Bus 407) (6 Wheeler) Wheeler) MAV Tractor Trailer Cycle Drawn PCUs are similar, with Population of Solapur
6:00-7:00 2.20 2.20 2.20 1.29 1.58 1.41 3.43 3.43 2.11 4.25 4.25 4.45 0.00 0.00 4.35 3.34 9,51,558 (Estimated Population of
19:00-20:00 6.09 6.09 6.09 5.16 6.57 7.04 5.14 5.14 6.17 5.93 5.93 3.63 50.00 0.00 9.36 0.00 5.49 Bikaner for 2023 is 8,23,755)
20:00-21:00 6.21 6.21 6.21 2.58 4.64 5.63 4.57 4.57 3.76 5.27 5.27 3.99 0.00 0.00 3.34 0.00 4.66
Then 16 hour data of 6am to 10pm was
21:00-22:00 4.35 4.35 4.35 1.47 2.65 4.23 5.14 5.14 4.06 5.69 5.69 5.86 0.00 0.00 2.68 0.00 4.64
converted into 24hr volume count by
Outer Cordon 1 Away from city (National Highway) considering 10% night traffic count to
Fast Passenger Vehicles Goods Vehicles Slow Modes
achieve mode-wise expansion factor
3 Axle Truck and overall expansion factors.
Two LCV 2 Axle Truck (10 Tractor + Animal
Time Car Taxi jeep/ van Auto Rick. Wheeler Mini Bus. govt. bus private Bus (Tata 407) (6 Wheeler) Wheeler) MAV Tractor Trailer Cycle Drawn Hourly Total EXPANSION FACTORS:
7:00-8:00 36 1 3 19 4 0 3 12 18 48 30 117 0 0 0 0 291 For National Highways-1.30 (12hr traffic
8:00-9:00 36 0 20 13 16 8 3 15 14 30 42 90 5 5 0 0 296 volume count to 24hr traffic volume
9:00-10:00 129 2 21 25 63 4 18 6 36 36 45 90 9 0 1 0 484
count)
10:00-11:00 116 12 13 22 55 0 3 18 50 87 63 194 9 27 0 0 668
11:00-12:00 129 17 14 28 68 0 15 36 77 93 60 122 23 0 0 0 680
For State Highways-1.30 (12hr traffic
12:00-13:00 115 10 29 44 48 0 18 3 83 75 45 189 0 14 0 0 672 volume count to 24hr traffic volume
13:00-14:00 93 5 11 32 33 4 24 3 84 51 81 203 9 0 1 0 633 count).
14:00-15:00 112 2 10 31 33 0 12 24 77 66 78 180 14 14 0 0 652 • Expansion factor was determined
15:00-16:00 79 2 6 33 38 4 15 18 60 54 87 158 14 0 0 0 567 after analyzing the traffic at different
16:00-17:00 56 5 7 47 27 2 3 21 59 42 42 203 0 5 0 0 518
cordon points with road hierarchy
17:00-18:00 97 3 5 37 42 6 9 15 66 69 54 185 0 14 0 0 601
18:00-19:00 53 2 1 30 22 0 0 3 41 45 51 122 5 0 0 0 374
and traffic volume count comparison
12 Hour Total 1051 61 140 361 446 28 123 174 662 696 678 1850 86 77 1 0 6432 of volume count at similar time
6:00-7:00 23 1 3 5 7 0 4 6 14 30 29 82 0 0 0 0 215 intervals.
19:00-20:00 64 4 9 19 29 2 6 9 41 41 40 67 43 0 0 0 353 • (Sources: Primary Survey &
20:00-21:00 65 4 9 9 21 2 6 8 25 37 36 74 0 0 0 0 300 Comprehensive Mobility plan for
21:00-22:00 46 3 6 5 12 1 6 9 27 40 39 108 0 0 0 0 298
Solapur 2016)
16 HOURS 1249 72 166 399 514 33 145 206 768 843 821 2181 128 77 1 0 7598
10% 125 7 17 40 51 3 15 21 77 84 82 218 13 8 0 0 760
24 HOURS 1374 80 183 439 566 36 160 226 845 927 903 2399 141 84 1 0 8358 Inference-
Expansion factor 1.31 1.31 1.31 1.22 1.27 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.28 1.33 1.33 1.30 1.65 1.10 1.32 0.00 1.30 • National Highways have 1.30
Source- Primary Survey , Comprehensive Mobility Plan Solapur 2016, Secondary Data Analysis expansion factor.
• Sate Highways have 1.31 expansion
Expansion Factor from Solapur CMP (State Highways) factor.
3 Axle Truck • Mode-wise there will be different
Two LCV/ (Tata 2 Axle Truck (10 Tractor + Animal expansion factors with Auto
Car Taxi Jeep/Van Auto Rick. Wheeler Mini Bus govt. bus private Bus 407) (6 Wheeler) Wheeler) MAV Tractor Trailer Cycle Drawn PCUs
Total 429 5 255 372 617 20 96 102 780 51 219 153 9 581 10 160 3858
Rickshaw and 2 Wheeler having
Time Fast Passenger Vehicles Goods Vehicles Slow Modes least expansion since they are
passengers vehicles.
3 Axle Truck
Two LCV/ (Tata 2 Axle Truck (10 Tractor + Animal • Mode-wise there will be different
Car Taxi Jeep/Van Auto Rick. Wheeler Mini Bus Govt. Bus Private Bus 407) (6 Wheeler) Wheeler) MAV Tractor Trailer Cycle Drawn PCUs expansion factors with 3 Axle Truck
6:00-7:00 1.63 1.63 1.63 3.78 2.12 2.13 2.17 2.17 2.72 5.25 5.25 8.80 0.00 0.00 5.89 0.00 3.16
and MAV having more expansion
19:00-20:00 7.73 7.73 7.73 5.82 6.48 7.09 5.98 5.98 4.76 5.69 5.69 4.80 50.00 8.33 7.34 0.00 6.39
20:00-21:00 7.20 7.20 7.20 5.72 5.59 7.09 4.89 4.89 4.31 5.03 5.03 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.44 0.00 5.59
factor since lot of goods and freight
21:00-22:00 6.06 6.06 6.06 2.04 4.33 4.26 2.17 2.17 2.95 2.84 2.84 4.00 0.00 0.00 2.03 0.00 3.99 movement happening during night
Expansion Factor 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.29 1.30 1.33 1.27 1.27 1.26 1.31 1.31 1.34 1.65 1.19 1.32 1.10 1.31 time.

EXTERNAL TRAFFIC
CHARATERISTCS
Swapnil Thorat
(SPA/NS/TP/754)
6.4 62
24 Hour data after applying Expansion factor & Directional split Analysis
24 hour data after applying expansion factor Inference-
Average Daily • Cars have highest traffic share of 20%
% of share • OC1 has highest parentage of Outbound
Survey Volume(12hrs) Traffic -24 hrs. Directional Split Inbound Out Bound % Share of Total Traffic Composition
of all traffic with 53.75% traffic flow away from
Estimated
goods the city.
Cordo Vehicl Inbound( Outbound( Inbound( Outbound( Passengers( Good(
PCU Vehicle PCU Vehicle PCU Vehicle PCU traffic • OC3 has least outbound traffic with 50.14%
n Point e %) %) %) %) %) %)
OC-1 7423 11968 9581 15600 46.38 53.62 4875 7237 5112 8364 11.71 13.61 36.74 63.26 37.45 traffic flow away from city.
OC-2 5642 7992 7314 10431 48.56 51.44 3880 5068 3876 5365 8.22 8.75 56.36 43.64 14.97 • OC1 has highest share of Goods vehicles
OC-3 7252 9126.5 9303 11738 49.86 50.14 5135 5852 4603 5884 9.63 9.68 61.07 38.93 16.37 with 63.26% percentage of total Traffic
OC-4 6591 7685 8623 9929 49.64 50.35 4661 5000 4096 4930 8.1 8.16 50.45 49.55 18.15 volume.
OC-5 9901 9960 12651 13372 49.42 50.58 6993 6607 5764 6764 11.01 11.12 69.89 30.11 13.06 • OC5 has highest share of passenger
vehicles with 69.89% of total traffic volume.
TOTAL 36809 46731 47472 61070 48.74 51.26 25544 29764 23451 31307 100% 100% 54.17 45.83 100
Traffic Composition Goods Vs Passengers Directional split

100% 100%
90% 90%
30.11
80% 38.93 80%
43.64
49.55 53.75 51.57 50.14 50.20 50.26
70% 63.26 70%
60% 60%
50% 50%
40% 40%
69.89
30% 56.36 61.07 30%
50.45 48.43 49.86 49.80 49.74
20% 46.25
36.74 20%
10% 10%
0% 0%
OC1 OC2 OC3 OC4 OC5 OC1 OC2 OC3 OC4 OC5
Traffic Composition Passengers(%) Traffic Composition Good(%) DIRECTIONAL SPLIT INBOUND DIRECTIONAL SPLIT OUTBOUND
Total Traffic Composition at Outer Cordon Points Passenger vs. Goods distribution at outer Overall directional split at outer cordon
0% 1% Car Taxi cordon points points
1%
5%
Jeep/ Van Auto Rick.
20%
1%
14% Two Wheeler Mini Bus.
3% Goods In
Govt. Bus Private Bus Out
6% 46% Passangers Passangers 49% In
51%
7% 54% Goods Out
LCV (Tata 407) 2 Axle Truck
6% (6 Wheeler)
3 Axle Truck (10 Wheeler) MAV
13%
13%
6% Tractor Tractor + Trailer
3% 1%

EXTERNAL TRAFFIC
CHARATERISTCS
Swapnil Thorat
(SPA/NS/TP/754)
6.5 63
Expansion Factor and 24 Hour Traffic Volume Count Data
12 Traffic Volume count data Modal Composition 12 hr data (In%)
PCU 1 1 1 1 0.5 2 3 3 1.5 3 3 4.5 4.5 4.5 0.5 8
1.25
2 Axle 0.33
LCV 3 Axle 1.29
Jeep/ Auto Two Govt. Private Truck Tractor + Animal
Cordon Point Car Taxi Mini Bus. (Tata Truck (10 MAV Tractor Cycle 5.09
Van Rick. Wheeler Bus Bus (6 Trailer Drawn
407) Wheeler) 20.45
Wheeler)
OC1 1051 61 140 361 445.5 28 123 174 662 696 678 1849.5 85.5 76.5 1 0 OUT 13.98
1 0.74
822 43 94 425 426.5 16 81 105 561 510 567 1705.5 27 144 0 8 IN
1873 104 234 786 872 44 204 279 1223 1206 1245 3555 112.5 220.5 1 8 11967 Total 3.35
OC2 1440 27 113 76 236 24 243 330 557 336 231 319.5 45 72 0 88 OUT 6.35
2 7.22
1073 5 163 50 254.5 34 120 315 414 330 426 499.5 81 63 0.5 56 IN
5.55
2513 32 276 126 490.5 58 363 645 971 666 657 819 126 135 0.5 144 8022 Total
OC3 1189 23 117 327 522 62 243 324 557 162 201 544.5 54 171 8 72 OUT 12.6
3 12.59
1091 58 89 330 586 46 180 387 561 159 132 720 36 144 7.5 24 IN
2280 81 206 657 1108 108 423 711 1118 321 333 1264.5 90 315 15.5 96 9127 Total 5.61
OC4 429 5 255 372 616.5 20 96 102 780 51 219 153 9 580.5 9.5 160 OUT 2.88 0.7
4
471 0 183 355 768 0 90 114 710 153 240 171 76.5 459 13 24 IN Car Taxi
Jeep/ Van Auto Rick.
900 5 438 727 1384.5 20 186 216 1490 204 459 324 85.5 1039.5 22.5 184 7685 Total
Two Wheeler Mini Bus.
OC5 1059 58 241 518 865 58 114 432 549 120 213 445.5 144 301.5 35 104 OUT Govt. Bus Private Bus
5
1038 72 187 600 1236.5 44 69 369 600 105 96 198 54 396 82 56 IN LCV (Tata 407) 2 Axle Truck
2097 130 428 1118 2101.5 102 183 801 1149 225 309 643.5 198 697.5 117 160 10460 Total 3 Axle Truck (10 Wheeler) MAV
Tractor Tractor + Trailer
Total 9663 352 1582 3414 5957 332 1359 2652 5949 2622 3003 6606 612 2408 156.5 592 47259 Cycle Animal Drawn
Modal Composition Modal Composition 24hr data (In%)

(In%)
20.45 0.74 3.35 7.22 12.60 0.70 2.88 5.61 12.59 5.55 6.35 13.98 1.29 5.09 0.33 1.25 100.00
4.49 0.34 1.07
1.65
Source- Primary Data Collection (Traffic Volume Count Survey)
Estimated 24 Traffic Volume count data 20.76

PCU 1 1 1 1 0.5 2 3 3 1.5 3 3 4.5 4.5 4.5 0.5 8 14.05
0.75
2 Axle
LCV 3 Axle 3.42
Jeep/ Auto Two Govt. Private Truck Tractor + Animal
Cordon Point Car Taxi Mini Bus. (Tata Truck (10 MAV Tractor Cycle 6.54
Van Rick. Wheeler Bus Bus (6 Trailer Drawn 6.96
407) Wheeler)
Wheeler) 5.86
OC1 1374 80 183 439 566 36 160 226 845 927 903 2399 141 84 1 0 OUT
1 12.46
1075 56 123 517 542 21 105 137 716 764 756 2213 45 158 0 9 IN 12.41
2449 136 306 955 1107 57 265 363 1561 1691 1659 4612 186 243 1 9 15600 Total
5.64
OC2 1883 35 148 92 300 31 316 429 711 448 308 414 74 79 0 97 OUT
1403 7 213 61 323 44 156 410 529 440 568 648 134 69 1 62
2
IN 2.89 0.71
3285 42 361 153 623 75 472 839 1239 887 875 1062 208 149 1 158 10431 Total
OC3 1554 30 153 397 663 81 316 422 711 216 268 706 89 188 11 79
3
OUT Inference-
1426 76 116 401 744 60 234 504 716 212 176 934 59 158 10 26 IN • There is different expansion factor for
2981 106 269 799 1407 141 550 925 1427 428 444 1640 149 347 20 106 11738 Total different road hierarchy.
OC4 579 7 344 480 804 27 122 129 984 67 286 205 15 692 13 176 OUT • National Highways have 1.30 expansion
4 factor.
635 0 247 505 1001 0 114 144 895 200 314 229 126 547 17 26 IN
• Sate Highways have 1.31 expansion
1214 7 591 985 1805 27 236 274 1880 267 600 433 141 1239 30 202 9929 Total
factor.
OC5 1391 76 315 630 1098 75 148 562 705 168 288 578 238 332 46 114 OUT
5 • Mode-wise there will be different
1357 94 244 729 1570 57 90 480 766 140 128 257 89 436 108 62 IN expansion factors with Auto Rickshaw
2748 170 560 1359 2669 133 238 1042 1471 308 416 835 327 767 154 176 13372 Total and 2 Wheeler having least expansion
Total 12677 460 2086 4251 7611 433 1762 3443 7579 3581 3994 8583 1010 2744 206 651 61070 since they are passengers vehicles.
• Mode-wise there will be different
expansion factors with 3 Axle Truck and
Modal
Composition (In%)
20.76 0.75 3.42 6.96 12.46 0.71 2.89 5.64 12.41 5.86 6.54 14.05 1.65 4.49 0.34 1.07 100.00 MAV having more expansion factor since
lot of goods and freight movement
Source- Comprehensive Mobility Plan Solapur 2016 case study, Secondary Data Analysis happening during night time.

EXTERNAL TRAFFIC
CHARATERISTCS
Swapnil Thorat
(SPA/NS/TP/754)
6.6 64
Peak Hour Share and Level of Service
Sr. No. Cordon point Inwards Direction Flow Outwards Direction Flow Total
Peak hour Total Volume Peak hour share Peak hour Total Volume Peak hour share Peak hour Total Volume Peak hour share
volume Count inwards volume Count outwards volume Count total
1 Outer cordon 1 771 7237 10.65% 766 8364 9.16% 1537 15600 9.85%
2 Outer cordon 2 441 5068 8.70% 564 5365 10.51% 919 10429 8.81%
3 Outer cordon 3 594 5852 10.15% 558 5884 9.48% 1123 11739 9.57%
4 Outer cordon 4 513 5000 10.26% 513 4930 10.41% 1024 9931 10.31%
5 Outer cordon 5 744 6607 11.26% 801 6764 11.84% 1277 13373 9.55%
Peak Hour Factor Inference-

Vehicle and PCU count • Vehicle count at OC5 has higher
14000 1.00
0.94 0.93 0.93 volume but PCU count at OC1 is high
0.90 0.88 0.95 that is 11968 PCU.
11968 0.93 0.94 0.92
12000 0.82 • Peak Hour share lies between 8-12%
0.80 0.83 at Outer Cordon Points.
99019960 0.79
10000 0.70 0.75 0.76 • Peak Hour share at OC2 for inwards
9126.5 traffic is 8.70 % which is lowest.
0.69
Peak Hour Factor

7992
7685 0.60 • Peak Hour share at OC5 is highest
8000
Numbers
7423 7252 0.58 11.26% for inwards traffic.

6591 0.50
• Peak Hour share at OC1 for outwards
6000 5642 traffic is 9.16% which is low.
0.40
• Peak Hour factor at OC5 is highest
4000 0.30 11.84% for outwards traffic.
• Peak Hour factor for both directions
0.20
at OC2 is 8.81%
2000
0.10 • Peak Hour share for both directions
at OC4 is highest 10.31%.
0 0.00 • Level of service at OC1 is at class C
OC-1 OC-2 OC-3 OC-4 OC-5 OC1 OC2 OC3 OC4 OC5 which is a issue.
Outer Cordon Points Outer Cordon Points • Level of service at OC1 is at class B
Vehicle PCU peak hour share Inwards peak hour share Outwards peak hour share total which needs to be look after.
Cordon point Location Row Type of Traffic volume count Peak hour Design Capacity V/C LOS
Carriageway volume
Name of the road (In M) (In PCU) (In PCU) (As per INDO HCM)
Near Shankla Hotel,Bichwal Plant, Suratgarh - Bikaner
30 11968 1537 1680 0.91 C
OC1 Road (NH 62) 2 Lane Undivided
30 8022 919 3780 0.24 A
OC2 Near Shangwa Restaurent, Jaipur Road (NH 11) 4 Lane Undivided
Near HP Petrolpump ,Udai Ramsar, Bikaner - Barmer
45 9127 1123 3780 0.30 A
OC3 Road (NH 62) 4 Lane Divided
Near Rajbhog Resort, suratgarh -chattargarh- bikaner
30 7685 1024 1680 0.61 B
OC4 road 2 Lane Undivided
Reliance jio petrol pump , Jaisalmer-bikaner-kolayat
45 10460 1277 5880 0.22 A
OC5 Road (NH 11) 6 Lane Divided

EXTERNAL TRAFFIC
Master in Transport Planning, 2nd Semester CHARATERISTCS
Swapnil Thorat
(SPA/NS/TP/754)
6.7 65
OUTER CORDON TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS
OBJECTIVES Location
- To understand travel desire pattern of the traffic entering/ leaving the study Survey Location
ID
area - regional traffic.
- to asses travel pattern of Passenger and Goods
- To determine the by-passable traffic
LIMITATION: Survey was conducted for 12 hrs Survey (7 am to 7 pm) only. Suratgarh - Bikaner Road (NH 62) OC 1
1
4
Jaipur Road (NH 11) OC2

2
5
Bikaner - Barmer Road (NH 62) OC3
suratgarh -chattargarh- bikaner road

OC4
3 (SH 3)
Jaisalmer-bikaner-kolayat Road (NH 11) OC5
IE Zones 1 IE Zones 2 Ext. Zones 3 Ext. Zones 4 Ext. Zones 5
83
75 85
88 94
95 81 Bikaner 87
76 82
79 77 80 92
91
81 86
- 90
84
78 85
93
• CITY LEVEL - INTERNAL ZONES – 60
• IMMEDIATE EXTERNAL ZONE 1(VILLAGES) –14
89
• IMMEDIATE EXTERNAL ZONE 2( TEHSIL LEVEL ) - 5
• EXTERNAL ZONES 3 (DISTRICT LEVEL) - 4
• EXTERNAL ZONES 4 (STATE LEVEL) - 5
• EXTERNAL ZONES 5 (NATIONAL LEVEL) – 6
• TOTAL EXTERNAL ZONES - 34

6.8
Presented By-
Outer Cordon Travel
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Aman Kumar
Characteristics SPA/NS/TP/2022/731
PASSENGER MOVEMENT TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS
TOTAL SAMPLE COLLECTED FOR 12 HRS. - 407 Purpose
FROM BIKANER - 187
62341, 40%
TO BIKANER – 220
12%
24 HRS. EXTRAPOLATED VEHICULAR TRIPS - 27543 1 Work
24 HRS. EXTRAPOLATED PASSENGER- 155654 5 Bussiness
8%
34% Education
Social
ZONE WISE DISTRIBUTION OF VEHICULAR AND PASSENGER TRIPS 8%
269199, 44.5 % Shopping
4
VEHICLE PASSENGER PASSENGER Tourist
ZONES VEHICLE % 7% Religious
TRIPS TRIPS %
Medical
I-E 10193 37 % 62341 40 % 5% 10% Other
E-I 11767 43% 69199 44.5% 11% 5%
3
E-E 5583 20% 24114 15.5 % 24114, 15.5 %
27543 100 155654 100
Distribution Of Passenger Trips – cordon Point Wise
9.45 2.64 TLFD - MODE WISE

25.02 21.79 100
34.46
47.89 90 90TH PERCENTILE (L90)
48.47
28.69 34.44 80 75TH PERCENTILE (L75)
35.18
70
Cumulative Percentage
46.29 49.47 60
42.08 43.77
30.37 50 50TH PERCENTILE (L50)
40
OC1 OC2 OC3 OC4 OC5
30
I- E E-I E-E
20
10 -
Avg. Occupancy 0
42.60 42.98 *01-10 *11-20 *21-30 *31-40 *41-50 *51-60 *61-70 *71-80 *81-90 *91-100 *>100 Distance (Km)
Car 2 Wheeler Auto Rickshaw Taxi Jeep/Van Mini Bus Govt. Bus Pvt. Bus
INFERENCES:
• For trips by Car, 50 to 75 percentile of the trips are in between 45 to 95 km.
4.33 4.42 6.15 • For trips by 2 Wheelers, 50 to 75 percentile of the trips are in between 5 to 50 km.
3.25 1.94 • For trips by Taxis, all the trips are in between 20 to 50km.
• For trips by Mini Buses, all the trips start for a distance of 70 km.
Car Two Taxi Auto Rick. Jeep/ Van Govt. Bus Private Bus
Wheeler • For trips by Pvt. as well as Govt. buses, 50 percentile of the trips are up to 90 km.

6.9
Presented By-
Outer Cordon Travel
PASSENGER TRIPS 2023 (Extrapolated For 24 Hrs.)
From Bikaner Car 2 Wheeler Taxi Jeep/Van Auto Rickshaw Govt. Bus Pvt. Bus Total
OC1 4554 1698 0 976 1971 2279 2250 13728
OC2 6363 0 175 1184 0 3544 5005 16271
OC3 4730 1729 0 651 0 5880 7403 20393
OC4 1320 2814 14 3440 0 1691 1728 11007
OC5 3608 366 0 1575 2520 2205 9562 19836
Total 20575 6607 189 7826 4491 15599 25948 81234
To Bikaner Car 2 Wheeler Taxi Jeep/Van Auto Rickshaw Govt. Bus Pvt. Bus Total
OC1 3634 2166 0 614 2686 1680 1840 12621
OC2 5050 0 0 1172 182 1820 4795 13019
OC3 4162 2976 455 465 1471 4212 8904 22644
OC4 1606 4005 0 1305 0 1471 1910 10296
OC5 3214 2460 0 1222 0 1530 7413 15839
Total 17666 11607 455 4779 4339 10713 24862 74420
Both Direction Car 2 Wheeler Taxi Jeep/Van Auto Rickshaw Govt. Bus Pvt. Bus Total
OC1 8188 3864 0 1590 4657 3959 4090 26349
OC2 11413 0 175 2356 182 5364 9800 29290
OC3 8892 4705 455 1116 1471 10092 16307 43037
OC4 2926 6819 14 4745 0 3162 3638 21303
OC5 6822 2826 0 2797 2520 3735 16975 35674
Total 38241 18214 644 12605 8830 26311 50809 155654
TOTAL PASSENGER TRIPS AT THE FIVE CORDON POINTS PASSENGER TRIPS BY PUBLIC AND PRIVATE MODES INFERENCES :
100.0
• The maximum number of
90.0 passengers trips are at OC 3 i.e.,
80.0
73.0 20393.
70.0 68.4
63.7
• 50.5% of the passenger trips are at
61.0 OC3 and OC5.
60.0 54.3 55.8
• The total percentage of Passenger
50.0 45.7 44.2
39.0
trips by Public modes are 63.7%.
40.0 36.3
31.6 • The total percentage of Passenger
30.0 27.0 -
trips by Private modes are 36.3%.
20.0 • The highest percentage of private
10.0 mode Passenger trips is at OC 1,
0.0
which is 45.7%.
OC1 OC2 OC3 OC4 OC5 OVER ALL • The highest percentage of public
Private Public
mode Passenger trips is at OC 5,
which is 73%.
▪ No. of Passenger Trips by ▪ No. of Passenger Trips by
Private Mode is 56455 Public Mode is 99199

6.10
Presented By-
Outer Cordon Travel
Distribution of Trips by Purpose and by Mode
MODE
Auto
Car 2 Wheeler Taxi Jeep/Van Govt. Bus Pvt. Bus Total
Rickshaw
Trips %age Trips %age Trips %age Trips %age Trips %age Trips %age Trips %age
P Work 9911 29 6360 36 14 2 3366 28 10813 41 15723 31 5517 68 51704
U Bussiness 1944 6 0 0 0 0 96 1 467 2 12239 24 530 7 15276
R Education 348 1 4005 23 0 0 748 6 461 2 2306 5 0 0 7867
P
Social 7337 21 0 0 175 27 5438 45 1513 6 671 1 802 10 15936
O
S Shopping 622 2 804 5 0 0 120 1 2605 10 2256 4 535 7 6942
E Tourism 4040 12 3177 18 240 37 172 1 1146 4 2016 4 0 0 10791
Religious 3367 10 804 5 0 0 427 4 3807 14 4309 8 0 0 12714
Medical 4445 13 2232 13 95 15 457 4 2120 8 1926 4 517 6 11791
Other 2482 7 266 2 120 19 1139 10 3378 13 9363 18 207 3 16955
Total 34495 100 17648 100 644 100 11963 100 26311 100 50809 100 8107 100 149977
Distribution of Trips by Purpose and by Mode INFERENCES :

Other 7 2 19 10 13 18 3
• The maximum number of Car trips are carried out for the purpose
Medical 13 13 15 4 8 4 6 of Work followed by Social.
• The maximum number of 2 wheelers Trips are for the purpose of
Religious 10 5 0 4 14 8 0
work followed by Educational reasons.
Tourist 12 18 37 1 4 4 0 • The maximum number of taxis are used for the purpose of Tourism
and social.
Shopping 2 5 01 10 4 7
• The maximum number of trips carried out by Jeep/Van are for the
Social 21 0 27 45 6 1 10 Social and recreational purpose and then followed Work.
• The maximum number of trips of trips carried
- out by auto are for
Education 1 23 0 6 2 5 0 the purpose of work.
Bussiness 6 01 2 24 7 • The maximum number of trips carried out by Govt. Buses are for
the purpose of Work and followed religious purpose.
Work 29 36 2 28 41 31 68 • The maximum number of trips carried out by Pvt. Buses are for the
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
purpose of Work and business.
Car 2 Wheeler Taxi Jeep/Van Govt. Bus Pvt. Bus Auto Rickshaw

6.11
Presented By-
Outer Cordon Travel
Desire Line Diagram
Desire line diagram for total trips Desire line diagram for E-E trips
Legends Ludhiana
Legends Bhatinda
Punjab
Anoopgarh
Suratgarh
Delhi
Churu Haryana
Jaipur UP
Jodhpur
Jaisalmer
Inference :
▪ For the above external to external desire line diagram major trips are generating Between
Zone 88 to Zone 78 and Zone 89 to Zone 85 and followed by Zone 90 and Zone 85

6.12
Presented By-
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Desire Line Diagram Aman Kumar
Master in Transport Planning, 2nd Semester SPA/NS/TP/2022/731
Desire Line Diagram
Desire line diagram for I-E trips Desire line diagram for E-I trips
Anoopgarh
Suratgarh Anoopgarh
Suratgarh
Delhi
Ratangarh
Churu
Khara
Towards UP
Jodhpur,Ajmer Churu
Jaipur,Kota
Ajmer
Chittaurgarh
Inference : Inference :
▪ For the above internal to external desire line diagram major ▪ For above external to internal desire line diagram major
trips are towards Jaipur, Kota, Ratangarh, Anoopgarh, trips are generated from Anoopgarh, Suratgarh and Khara
Suratgarh etc. industrial area etc.

6.13
Presented By-
Outer Cordon Travel
Introduction- Outer Cordon Goods Movement
Survey Locations
05 OC Locations 6 am to 7:30 pm (13.5 hrs) Total 236 Samples collected
No. of Samples taken

OC 1 OC 2 OC 3 OC 4 OC 5 Grand Total
LCV 17 22 30 39 8 116
IN 10 4 15 18 47
OUT 7 18 15 21 8 69
Two Axle Truck 11 1 5 6 2 26
IN 1 1 1 4 1 8
Mode
OUT 5 4 2 6 17
Three Axle Truck 17 2 5 10 3 37
IN 6 2 3 4 3 18
OUT 1 2 2 5
MAV 14 12 12 7 3 38
IN 6 5 2 13
OUT 8 2 7 1 1 19
TOTAL 59 37 52 54 16 236
Passenger v/s Goods Inferences:

OC Road name & Cordon Location Road Hierarchy
Vehicles ➢Overall Volume of goods Vehicle is
OC 1 Suratgarh - Bikaner Road NH 62 45%.
OC 2 Jaipur Road NH 11
45% Passenger ➢Maximum no. of goods vehicles
OC 3 Bikaner - Barmer Road NH 62 are entering as well as exiting
Suratgarh -Chattargarh- Bikaner road (Pugal 55% Goods through the OC1. Hence Suratgarh-
OC 4 SH
Bikaner road is one of the major road
Rd)
for goods vehicle movement, inside
OC 5 Jaisalmer-bikaner-kolayat Road (NH 11) NH 11
& Outside the city.
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043 Outer Cordon Travel

6.14
Presented By- Nitin Kumar
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Characteristics SPA/NS/TP/743
Master in Transport Planning, 2nd Semester (Goods Vehicles)
DISTRIBUTION OF TRIPS BY MODE
24 hr Expanded data (No. of Vehicle) Distribution Of Trips by mode at each cordon Point
2 Axle33% 3 Axle In
OC LCV Truck Truck MAV Grand Total In
LCV
1 (Total) 2165 509 637 1445 4755
2 Axle Truck Out
In 716 509 336 60% 716 2277 OC 1 29%
Out 1448 0% 7% 301 729 2478 3 Axle Truck
42% 50%
2 (Total) 958 147 189 126 1420 MAV In 31% 32% 59%
In 352 147 189 688 12%
Out 605 126 732 Out Out
0%
7% 1% 15% 22% 0% 0%
3 (Total) 1142 143 193 526 2003 33% 14% LCV
OC 4
In 605 71 59 307 1041 28%
Out 537 72 134 219 961 60% 17% 2 Axle
0% 51%
4 (Total) 929 144 226 405 1705 7% 69% Truck 21%
In 398 133 131 662 Out
0% In
Out 531 11 95 405 1043 NH 11
5 (Total) 470 103 57 429 1058 17% 0% OC 2

17%
In 47 57 174 277 OC 5 0%
NH 11
Out 470 56 255 781 20%

63%
Grand Total 5663 1045 1302 2930 10941 83%
In
Average Trip Length by Mode (IN):
500 430.6
400 384.6 23%
Out
300 240.4 14% 56%
200
103.8
100 7% 29%
0 OC 3
LCV 2 Axle Truck 3 Axle Truck MAV NH 62 58% -
6%
Average Trip Length by Mode (OUT): 7%
1000
800 768.4
Inferences:
600
400 ➢OC1 is one of the major route as it has the maximum traffic volume as compared to rest of Cordon
178 Points.
123.5
200 106.01
➢LCV is the Dominant Mode of Transportation of goods through the city.
0 ➢MAV is the least preferred choice of mode os. Compared to other modes of Transportation of goods.
LCV 2 Axle Truck 3 Axle Truck MAV

6.15
DISTRIBUTION OF TRIPS BY COMMODITY
Distribution of trips by Commodity at each cordon Pt. No. of Empty goods vehicle Samples excluded= 1541
Remaining Vehicle for Commodity wise Analysis = 9400
Distribution of trips by Distribution of trips by Commodity
Commodity (IN): (OUT):
Food Grains 23.2% Food Grains 14.3%
Vegetables/Fruit 7.3% Vegetables/Fruit 12.2%
Coal/Timber 3.7%
Coal/Timber 2.0%
Industrial raw Industrial raw Material 16.3%
Material 17.1%
Building Material 17.1% Building Material 23.5%
FMCG 17.1% FMCG 13.3%
Milk/Dairy product 3.7% Milk/Dairy product 7.1%

Other 11.0% Other 11.2%
➢OC1 is one of the major route for the transportation of Industrial
materials through the city.
➢Food grains & Dairy Products are majorly carried out through the
city by OC2, i.e. Jaipur Road.
➢Building Materials are majorly carried out through the OC 5, i.e.
Commodity Wise Trip Distribution by Mode Jaisalmer Bikaner Road.
2 Axle 3 Axle Inferences (In v/s Out):
Commodity LCV Truck Truck MAV Total
Building materials 7% 1% 3% 5% 16% ➢Goods vehicles with Food grains holds the largest share of the total goods imported to
the city.
Coal/ Timber/ Fuel 2% 0% 0% 0% 2%
➢Goods vehicles with Building materials also holds the largest share of the total goods
FMCG 9% 1% 2% 1% 12% exported outside from the city.
Food Grains 10% 6% 1% 7% 25% ➢While goods vehicles with industrial materials are equally moving inwards as well as
Industrial raw Material 8% 0% 4% 10% 23% outwards to the city.
Milk/ Dairy Products 3% 0% 2% 0% 4% ➢For all the commodities LCV has the maximum share by mode.
Other 8% 0% 1% 3% 12% ➢Out of this Fruits & Vegetables are majorly carried out with the help of LCV.
Vegetable/ Fruits 5% 0% 1% 1% 6% ➢Materials for Industrial purposes & Building Materials has a comparatively higher share
Total 52% 8% 13% 27% 100%
of goods vehicles carried out by the mode of 3 Axle trucks & the Multi Axle Trucks.

6.16
Tonnage
Tonnage Attracted & generated by the city
Modewise Daily Tonnage Attracted Average Tonnage by mode
Distribution of Total Tonnage by mode
OC LCV 2 Axle Truck 3 Axle Truck MAV Grand Total 30
1
IN 1194 3029 4911 12888 22022 11% 25 24.01
2
IN 881 1744 3690 6315 9% LCV 20 19.5
3
2 Axle Truck
Tonnage
IN 1194 840 1143 6146 9324 15
4 3 Axle Truck 11.9
56%
IN 912 595 2039 3546 24% MAV 10
5
IN 555 831 4170 5557 5
2.5
Grand Total 4181 6763 12615 23204 46763
0
LCV 2 Axle Truck 3 Axle Truck MAV
Modewise Daily Tonnage Generated Tonnage 2.5 11.9 19.5 24.01
Commodity wise Tonnage Attracted Commodity wise Tonnage Generated Industrial raw Material Most
OC LCV 2 Axle Truck 3 Axle Truck MAV Grand Total
Commodity Tonnage Commodity Tonnage Commonly consisted of:
1
Building materials 6254 Building materials 11292 •Gypsum
OUT 1408 5872 14004 21284
2 Coal/ Timber/ Fuel 484 Coal/ Timber/ Fuel •Automobile parts
OUT 1184 3030 4215 FMCG 3958 FMCG 2845 •Textile raw materials
3 •Iron Scrap for ind. Purpose
Food Grains 19108 Food Grains 1550
OUT 1184 856 1741 5248 9030 •Food Packaging & related
Industrial raw Material 10368 Industrial raw Material 19252 Materials etc.
4
OUT 1172 132 1861 61 3165 Milk/ Dairy Products 2047 Milk/ Dairy Products 1207
5 Other 3133 Other 6998
1175 666 6121 7962 Vegetable/ Fruits
Inferences:
OUT 1411 Vegetable/ Fruits 2512
Grand Total 6124 1654 9474 28403 45655

Grand Total 46763 Grand Total 45655 ➢OC 1 has the maximum
Amount of tonnage
Commodity wise Tonnage Attracted Commodity wise Tonnage Generated Building materials
generated and attracted.
7% 3% 6% Coal/ Timber/ Fuel
Modewise Total Tonnage 4%
13% 1% Consumer Goods
OC
1
LCV 2 Axle Truck 3 Axle Truck MAV Grand Total
2602 3029 10783 26892 43306 9%
15% 25%
Food Grains ➢While being in least in
3% no. MAV has the
2 2066 1744 3690 3030 10530 22% Industrial Material
3 2378 1697 2864 11394 18353 6% maximum amount of
4 2084 727 3899 6711
Milk/ Dairy Products tonnage generated &
41% 42% 3% Attracted because it has
5 1175 1221 831 10291 13518 Other
Grand Total 10305 8418 22088 51607 92418 Vegetable/ Fruits highest average Tonnage.

6.17
INTRODUCTION
Goods Vehicle O/D Matrix ( Year 2023)
O/D 1 3 4 6 12 16 21 22 25 27 31 32 35 36 41 43 44 45 46 50 54 55 56 58 60 61 63 65 66 68 69 70 73 75 76 77 78 79 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 91 92 93 94Grand Total

1 31 59 32 32 31 80 73 338
2 26 26
3 59 301 74 434
5 17 31 48
7 31 31
12 79 31 26 187 31 26 31 413
21 26 125 32 45 26 254
22 32 18 32 81
32 63 26 89
35 59 18 77
36 26 26
38 31 31
43 45 31 26 26 129
44 59 59 32 81 32 26 33 48 368
45 26 33 17 31 33 141
46 31 95 32 32 189
52 26 26
53 33 33
54 161 161
55 114 26 80 80 80 382
56 80 26 80 187
60 203 203
61 59 56 255 487
63 33 48 48 203 331
65 87 14 101
67 14 14 28
69 14 80 241 80 97 514
70 48 48
72 87 47 133
75 255 162 17 434
76 88 88
77 32 32 115 51 115 51 20 416

78 33 33 33 63 162
79 101 66 26 42 235
80 89 48 42 48 227
81 80 48 128
82 32 71 64 32 32 48 48 32 357
83 33 32 63 128
84 81 26 32 48 26 32 89 121 120 32 90 32 68 80 229 110 1216
85 17 20 147 42 31 256
86 95 73 168
87 26 95 48 73 241
88 26 31 48 121 349 104 31 711
89 89 17 89 79 17 291
92 26 48 88 146 124 432
93 17 73 90
94 51 51
Grand 28
Total 8 58 320 87 270 33 219 99 115 102 66 17 131 32 26 78 332 154 48 270 142 256 147 14 32 278 423 117 59 56 233 59 255 322 272 423 33 293 121 332 277 1332 327 189 331 496 425 122 720 48 64 10941

6.18
Movement pattern of Goods vehicles
Direction wise Trips (Overall)
Direction wise Trips (Overall) External- External Freight Trips by % :
I-E, E-I & E-E Trips :
% Grand
No. of (percentag O/D OC 1 OC 2 OC 3 OC 4 OC 5 Total
Direction
Vehicles e of OC 1 0% 9% 18% 9% 9% 44%
vehicle) OC 2 2% 0% 1% 0% 8% 11%
External – Internal (30.5%)
I-E 3668 33.5% OC 3 25% 1% 0% 7% 3% 35%
E-I 3334 30.5%
OC 4 2% 2% 1% 0% 1% 6%
E-E 3938 36%
OC 5 2% 2% 0% 1% 0% 4%
Total 10941 100%
Grand
Internal – External (33.5%) Total 30% 13% 20% 17% 21% 100%
Desire line Diagram for External- External Trips :

Hanumangarh
Lunkaransar
Suratgarh &
External - External (36%) Punjab
Pugal
Khajuwala
Beechwal
Jaipur
Alwar
Agra
Bikaner
Inferences:
➢At regional level, Most of the Transportation linkages are from zone 88 & Other Kolayat
zones towards it, so most of the goods vehicle travel from the OC,
➢Also, E-E traffic count is dominant through the OC1 & OC5, as it is clearly visible into
the Desire line Diagram.
➢Other regional linkages, for goods transportation of the city are from zones 84, 85 &
87.
➢Major linkages for goods transportation are from Immediate external zones.
Travelling through the OC1, OC3 & OC5.
➢All of the Above Movement Pattern observed from the Desire line Diagram shows
that Lack of proper Connectivity & no proper Continuity of bypass has led to High
Gujarat Nagaur
percentage of goods vehicle to Move through the city in order to use The NH11 & NH
& Maharashtra Ajmer
62 & other Intern Roads to get the connectivity. Chittor

6.19

Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan

Existing Expressway
National Highway
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
7.INTERMEDIATE PUBLIC TRANSPORT Railway

Jodhpur
Jaipur
Ratangarh
251
350
134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27

Rajasthan
-
Rajasthan
Bikaner District

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1
INTRODUCTION IPT User and Driver Survey Locations
Intermediate Public Transport (IPT) also known as para-
transit or feeder service comprises Taxis,
autorickshaws, share autos, cycle rickshaws and E-
rickshaws. These feeder services complement the
existing transport systems and also act as an
alternative when needed.
FEATURES OF IPT
First and Last Mile Connectivity
Door- To- Door Service
Flexibility
Total Auto Stands : 11
Selected Survey
Locations : 6
Types of stage carriage ( Shared IPT in Bikaner )
Contract Carriage : Contract carriages are

demand based services where the origin,
destination and routes are flexible.
Stage Carriage : Stage Carriage refers to shared
fixed route services with multiple stops in between 3 Seater Auto Rickshaw 6 Seater Auto Rickshaw
the origin and destination. Source : Primary survey 2023
(IPT Driver Survey)
Source : Centre for Public Policy and Research 2018
7.1
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043 Intermediate Public Presented By-
Transport Pooja Vanwe TP/744
IPT Route Coverage IPT Routes
(6.5 KM Beyond Distance

Study Area Boundary) Route Origin Destination
(KM)
1 Deshnok Khara 49
Kalla
Devkund
2 petrol 14
Sagar
Pump
Kalla
Vrindhawan
3 petrol 16
Enclave
Pump
Kalla
4 petrol Udassar 14
Pump
Museum M.P.
Circle 5 Udassar 14
Nagar
6 Khara Napasar 41
Samta
7 Udassar 10
Nagar
(6 KM Beyond
Study Area
Ganga Ganga
Boundary) 8 Sehar Nagar 7
Bazar Chauraha
(20 KM Beyond
Study Area MN Lal Garh
9 9
Boundary)
Institute Station
Kalla
10 petrol Murti Circle 10
Source : Primary survey 2023 Pump
TOTAL IPT ROUTE LENGHT : 184 KM TOTAL IPT ROUTE LENGHT WITHIN STUDY AREA : 138 KM OVERLAPPED IPT ROUTE LENGHT : 61 KM
7.2
IPT Route Catchment IPT Access Distance Analysis
0-300 M 300-500 M 500-600 M 600-2100 M

Access Access Access Access
Distance Distance Distance Distance
Area
Served (Sq 54.05 29.25 13.9 156.82
Km)
Population
Served
(2023 3,71,071 1,35,984 43,320 2,18,250
Population
: 8,23,755)
Access
28.13 37.5 9.38 25
Trips (%)
Dispersal
24.3 48.5 21.6 5.6
Trips (%)
For the year 2023 out of 8,23,755 population 5,07,055 people have to For the year 2023 out of 8,23,755 population
Source : Primary survey 2023
travel 500 M by walk to get a IPT, which is 61.55 % of the population. major number of access trips (37.5 %) as well as (Household Survey)
: Landuse Map 2023
Whereas, 5,50,375 people have to travel 600 M by walk to get a IPT, the dispersal trips (48.2 %) lie in the distance of
which is 66.81 % of the population. 300 to 500 M.
7.3
IPT SURVEY USER SURVEY ANALYSIS
TRIP LENGTH FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION AGE AND SEX COMPARISON OF THE USERS INCOME WISE DISTRIBUTION OF THE USER
AVERAGE AVERAGE 50TH 75TH

Out of 280 user survey samples 40 % of
TRIP LENGTH TRIP FARE PERCENTILE PERCENTILE Out of 280 user survey samples 69 % of the IPT users are the users using IPT earn <10,000 monthly,
male, while only 31 % of the IPT users are female. while 10 % of the users using IPT earn
5.2 KM RS. 22 2.4 KM 4 KM
The majority of IPT users i.e. 41 % are from 30-44 years 30,000 – 40,000 monthly.
Purpose wise Trip Frequency Distribution INFERENCES

i. Out of 280 user survey
Return Home
Recreational
Distribution
Frequency
Education
Shopping
Religious
samples 30.7 % of the
Medical
Business
Purpose
Others
Tourist
Social
Work
users are using IPT for
(%)
%
%
%
%
work, while 20 % are
Frequency using IPT for shopping
purpose.
Daily 53 61.63 19 61.63 2 33.33 9 16.07 1 33.33 6 40 2 8.70 1 50 1 50 6 12.24 37.5 ii. 37.5 % of the users are
using IPT for daily trips.
Weekly 12 39.08 2 39.08 2 33.33 18 32.14 33.33 4 26.67 5 21.74 2 28.57 7 14.29 18.57
iii. 29 % of the users use IPT
Monthly 2 2.33 4 2.33 2 33.33 16 28.57 1 3 20 4 17.39 5 71.43 6 12.24 15.35 as a feeder trip, while 71
33.33 % of the users use IPT as a
Occasional 18 58.61 5 58.61 13 23.21 1 2 13.33 12 52.17 1 50 1 50 22 44.90 26.78 main haul trip.
iv. The average access
Yearly 1 1.16 1 1.16 3 6.12 1.78 distance is 1.03 KM,
Total Trips 86 31 6 56 3 15 23 7 2 2 49 v. and the average wait
Purpose time for getting an IPT is
Distribution 30.71 11.07 2.14 20 1.07 5.36 8.21 2.50 0.71 0.71 17.5 5.3 minutes.
(%) Source : Primary survey 2023
(IPT User Survey)
7.4
PEAK HOUR PASSENGER VOLUME BY SHARED INTERMEDIATE PUBLIC TRANSPORT
IPT Top 20 Trips (2023) IPT Top 20 Trips Desire Line Map (2023)
Destination
Zones 1 25 38 39 45 60 61 62 63 65 69
7 497
10 920
18 543
21 643
22 694
25
30 515
32 1240
38 509
Origin
44 1953
52 706
53 491
57 583 476 IPT Total Trips Desire Line Map (2023)
58 1396
59 850 Most number of Trips are
from ward no. 44 to ward
60 1422 63 i.e. 1953 Trips, which is
61 1086 3.02 %
of Total Trips
62 1246
63 932
65 688 Source : Primary survey 2023
(Household Survey)
: Landuse Map 2023
TOTAL IPT TRIPS : 13 %
TOTAL IPT TRIPS : 37960
SHARED IPT TRIPS : 8 %
7.5
Transport Pooja Wanve TP/736
SHARED IPT CALIBRATED MATRIX 2023
Zone
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 Total
s
1 0 81 10 4 42 7 3 3 3 4 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 15 10 1 14 18 25 20 13 22 25 2 32 69 2 0 0 2 0 6 14 30 2 2 3 10 53 16 22 85 11 20 1 2 7 66 0 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 805
2 305 0 9 3 6 2 2 1 4 9 6 7 0 0 1 2 1 4 2 0 0 6 4 3 26 146 2 8 39 34 31 21 26 44 50 114 65 142 99 0 12 4 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 8 32 4 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1297
3 58 14 0 1 7 1 1 1 2 3 5 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 0 4 5 8 7 5 8 9 1 13 29 1 0 0 1 0 5 11 21 1 1 2 7 33 9 12 47 6 11 1 1 5 43 0 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 430
4 39 8 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 7 11 33 28 35 110 21 39 24 40 16 2 1 1 2 3 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 5 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 487
5 339 14 9 3 0 4 1 0 4 9 10 15 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 27 0 0 2 5 4 8 24 26 20 11 124 446 17 0 2 14 0 14 0 0 0 1 0 1 8 3 8 32 4 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1226
6 429 29 5 2 31 0 4 2 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 0 1 2 5 12 14 12 4 52 170 6 0 1 5 0 5 0 19 1 2 2 7 33 9 11 41 5 3 1 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 958
7 497 76 19 10 12 11 0 2 11 11 14 32 1 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 2 2 1 0 1 1 0 5 18 0 0 0 0 0 7 15 26 2 1 2 9 42 11 14 53 7 12 1 2 7 52 0 1 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1122
8 151 18 8 1 1 2 1 0 0 6 7 14 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 5 1 0 50 161 21 8 18 10 34 23 28 47 54 159 68 147 147 0 17 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1239
9 23 9 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 47 0 0 0 0 0 53 116 121 6 5 7 29 67 13 14 51 7 15 4 11 33 176 0 14 333 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1186
10 10 6 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 8 6 4 47 920 7 0 1 6 0 6 0 27 2 2 3 9 39 9 10 38 5 4 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1203
11 5 4 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 1 7 9 8 3 31 100 4 0 0 3 0 29 52 67 4 4 6 21 83 16 17 62 8 7 4 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 590
12 5 5 2 2 5 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 1 1 2 1 0 0 11 12 9 6 62 230 9 0 1 7 0 7 100 116 6 7 9 35 131 23 23 83 11 11 7 11 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 990
13 4 6 5 4 8 0 0 1 6 11 5 18 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 18 97 0 0 0 1 0 55 80 83 4 5 7 27 93 14 12 45 6 11 2 10 12 74 0 4 39 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 782
14 43 26 10 4 16 1 2 1 0 7 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 2 3 4 1 1 1 0 18 83 0 0 0 1 0 43 62 78 4 6 7 28 107 20 20 73 9 16 1 9 4 32 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 765
15 48 28 11 4 17 1 2 1 0 9 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 49 107 113 6 4 7 27 19 5 6 23 4 15 15 25 155 112 0 164 47 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1053
16 102 42 11 4 17 3 1 0 0 12 7 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 157 327 210 10 6 9 43 29 6 6 23 4 2 15 36 167 243 0 69 8 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 1609
17 151 83 18 10 47 6 3 3 11 10 30 58 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 6 8 7 2 25 77 3 0 0 2 0 74 130 137 7 8 10 40 140 23 21 75 9 11 8 14 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1312
18 262 196 38 24 151 30 14 14 45 20 89 139 14 6 11 19 2 1 7 5 7 15 0 3 199 199 30 8 12 6 29 15 14 28 38 75 24 543 46 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 59 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2464
19 12 31 4 4 66 110 32 14 20 2 29 33 5 5 10 27 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 2 4 34 159 7 0 1 5 0 6 0 0 1 1 1 5 3 4 5 18 2 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 722
20 6 12 2 1 23 5 10 5 22 9 38 19 19 5 9 19 18 4 2 0 0 9 6 0 58 119 35 16 50 27 19 10 10 19 25 53 18 31 36 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 780
21 1 3 0 0 6 1 4 1 8 1 3 6 2 2 4 8 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 643 0 0 0 1 0 174 357 184 9 5 7 36 50 7 5 18 2 2 6 24 81 55 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 1773
22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 694 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 8 0 0 1 2 3 1 2 6 1 5 0 1 2 17 0 0 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 922
23 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 8 3 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 3 3 1 1 2 0 26 131 0 0 0 2 0 74 129 133 7 7 9 38 133 21 19 67 9 11 8 13 19 13 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 919
24 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 2 12 20 6 0 1 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 6 0 2 0 0 1 7 0 0 1240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1327
25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 34 67 0 82 131 732 164 27 5 7 3 19 8 6 15 22 32 8 11 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 13 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 1487
26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 98 200 94 4 2 3 17 13 2 2 8 1 0 2 61 79 55 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 671
27 2 4 1 1 7 2 3 1 9 8 23 26 5 2 3 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 5 4 1 39 101 179 181 2 37 38 2 63 1 0 0 0 0 2 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 795
28 17 18 3 6 21 2 4 3 8 9 19 36 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 21 146 0 1 0 2 1 105 148 101 5 4 5 27 68 6 3 12 1 4 4 14 46 7 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 896
29 2 3 1 2 4 0 1 1 3 7 10 18 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 10 49 129 6 2 5 30 2 58 1 0 0 0 0 2 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 377
30 2 3 3 3 5 0 1 1 5 10 10 23 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 3 2 1 2 2 0 33 515 0 1 0 2 1 111 193 176 9 9 11 48 154 21 17 61 8 12 9 19 25 12 0 0 1240 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2785
31 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 4 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 12 68 155 5 1 5 30 2 52 1 0 0 0 0 2 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 384
32 3 5 5 4 8 0 0 1 7 13 9 2 0 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 24 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 3 10 220 42 115 122 0 130 27 64 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202 287 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1328
33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 7 58 365 2 0 2 14 1 19 66 64 3 3 4 18 59 9 7 27 3 5 3 7 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 771
34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 15 265 19 4 7 32 4 93 2 1 0 0 0 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 480
35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 271 118 41 0 0 0 5 3 1 1 2 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 611
36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 17 134 0 1 0 2 1 198 397 155 7 3 4 27 47 3 2 5 1 1 5 38 67 509 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 1 1653
37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 515 10 20 7 35 19 355 10 3 0 0 1 10 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 28 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 1096
38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 271 1 5 1 7 5 418 211 77 3 1 1 9 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 3 0 7 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 6 1070
39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 124 0 2 0 3 2 154 245 52 2 1 1 7 6 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 2 641
40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 153 1 5 1 5 5 333 178 19 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 8 752
41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 1 9 1 4 8 381 73 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 19 611
42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 286 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 5 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 487
43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 0 0 0 0 0 172 285 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 589
44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 47 0 1 0 1 1 385 426 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1953 1 0 0 0 0 177 0 0 0 0 1 3008
45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16 0 0 0 0 0 129 229 19 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 445
46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 21 14 5 24 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73
48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 88 356 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 239 0 0 0 0 0 703
49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 35 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 264 0 0 0 0 0 475
50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 583 0 0 0 0 0 0 476 0 0 0 0 0 1101
51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 71 2 1 53 259 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 0 0 170 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 437 1299
52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 706 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1396 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 2112
53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 399 0 186 66 43 242 117 491 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 26 472 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2242
54 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 267 42 8 31 24 244 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 711
55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 850 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 855
56 5 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 47 0 0 173 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 228 0 0 130 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 396 1059
57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 15 0 1 203 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 145 583 0 158 2 1 0 0 476 0 0 0 0 444 2060
58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 446 1369 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 1840
59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 22 178 0 1 0 3 1 141 236 125 6 4 5 27 58 4 2 6 1 3 5 17 21 1 228 850 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 1963
60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1422 0 0 88 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 211 1829
61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 39 1086 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 343 1600
62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 1378
63 412 3 0 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 932 0 0 0 0 214 1576
64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 18 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 156 0 0 0 0 0 184
65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 688 0 0 0 0 41 730
66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 79
67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54
69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 105
70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 247 0 0 0 0 0 247
71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 61 91
72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 138
73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3796
Total 2933 732 184 101 529 194 94 59 177 184 354 553 74 29 56 113 104 40 58 47 89 89 136 180 1209 947 180 77 206 140 196 140 186 280 313 779 1165 8890 1506 391 342 364 1047 4934 5859 2342 114 96 132 584 1559 275 274 1024 131 194 110 350 823 1497 4234 6098 5199 686 1967 574 15 31 4270 103 0 19 0 2437
0

Intermediate Public Transport
Presented By-
Pooja Vanwe TP/744 7.5a
PEAK HOUR PASSENGER VOLUME BY SHARED INTERMEDIATE PUBLIC TRANSPORT
LEGEND Avg.
Route
3 Origin Destination Occupan Passe
No.
cy nger PHPDT
Nagnechi
11 Temple Napasar 6.7 1481 67
4 Museum Circle Napasar 6.8 1646 81.6
Ganganagar
1 Chauraha Khara 7.2 2599 316.8
Ganganagar
1 3 Khara Chauraha 7.2 3060 302.4
2 Ganganagar
8 Deshnuk Chauraha 7.1 3294 149.1
1 Ganganagar
1 Chauraha Deshnuk 7.1 3323 191.7
M4 Nagnechi
4 Museum Circle Temple 4.1 9114 758.5
Nagnechi
10 Temple Museum Circle 4.1 9639 795.4
9
932 Museum
S3 1 5 Devkund sagar Chauraha 4.8 10618 1041.6
6 M5 5 Ganganagar
` 4 M1 1 Chauraha Gangashahar 4.5 10638 1246.5
Ganganagar
1011
7 Gangashahar Chauraha 4.5 10850 1147.5
10 9 Samta Nagar Museum Circle 4.2 11894 1184.4
4 Museum Circle Samta Nagar 4.2 12075 911.4
M2
Museum Dev kund
`
7 4 Chauraha sagar 4.8 12730 1387.2
Ganganagar
2 Beechwal Chauraha 5.2 12740 1440.4
Ganganagar
AUTO STAND 1 Chauraha Beechwal 5.2 12849 1326
3 MID BLOCK POINT 6
Kalla Petrol
Pump
Ganganagar
Chauraha 4.25 15547 1411
Ganganagar Kalla Petrol 1423.7
OUTER CORDON
POINT 1 Chauraha Pump 4.25 17344 5
Total 161440
NO. OF
8
PASSENGER IN Highest Number of trips are from Ganganagar
PEAK HOUR
TOTAL NO. OF Chauraha to Kalla petrol pump which are 1943

PASSENGER IN 24
HRS trips in Peak Hour.
7.6
Transport Dharamvir Gayen TP/736
ACCESSIBLITY INDEX OF SHARED IPT
• Where Nij =Off Peak

Frequency of Route’ I’
Passing through zone ‘J’,
Area of Zone ‘J’
• Ward No. 4 is having
accessibility index More than
4.
• Ward no.
7,9,13,16,17,18,1,9,30,32,35,4
4,57,58,59, have zero
accessibility index.
• Out side municipal
Boundary area TAZ
61,63,64,66,67,68,71,72,74
having zero Accessibility
index.
7.7
INTERMEDIATE PUBLIC TRANSPORT – DRIVER’S CHARATERISTICS
NO. OF AUTO RICKSHAW (DISTRICT) 11301 AGE OF VEHICLE
(Source: RTO) 3 SEATER (SHARED )-72% . RENTED OWNED
6 SEATER -28% < 4 YEAR 7%
OWNERSHIP OF VEHICLE 73 % OWNED AND 27 % RENTED 18%
TOTAL NO. OF FIXED ROUTE 10 11%
4-6
36%
TOTAL ROUTE LENGTH (IN KM) 184
6-10 46%
TOTAL ROUTE LENGTH OVERLAPPED (IN KM) 61 17%
NET ROUTE LENGTH (IN KM) 123 > 10 YEAR
36%
VEHICLE OWNER RENTED VEHICLE FUEL USED
AVERAGE NO. OF ROUND TRIP 6 6 29%
AVERAGE PASSENGER CARRIED PER DAY 53 57
• 36% of Total Rented Auto Rickshaw and 46% of Total owned
AVERAGE OCCUPANCY 4.2 4.4
AVERAGE EXPENDITURE ON FUEL (IN RS.) Auto Rickshaw is less than 4 year of age .
3.78 RS / KM 3.90 RS / KM
PER DAY/ KM
RENTED FUEL USE IN VEHICLE OWNED
AVERGAE EXPENDITURE ON
82.88 NA
MAINTAINANCE (IN RS.) PER DAY 7%
PETROL 17%
AVERGAE RENT PER DAY (IN RS.) NA 150-200
AVERAGR VEHICLE UTILIZATION 84.72 KM/DAY 86.29 KM/DAY 39% DIESEL
32% 45%
OPERATING HOURS PER DAY
50 • 50% of Total Rented Auto Rickshaw is CNG
50
operating 8-10 hrs. per day, 35%
40 38 LPG
whereas 38 % of Owned Auto Rickshaw 22% 3%
30 is operating 8-10 hrs.,
22 25
20 16 • 39% OF Total Rented Auto Rickshaws and 45 % of Total owned
13 13
8 9 Auto Rickshaw are LPG.
10 04
INCOME WISE DISTRIBUTION
0 40 37 39
4-6 6-8 8-10 10-12 >12 32 • 37% of Total Rented Auto
31
DISTANCE OPERATED PER DAY 30 Rickshaw driver has income
40 39
• 39% of Total Rented Auto 20 between 401-599 Rs per day.
29 14 13
30
24 Rickshaw is operating 80-100 11 10 whereas 39% of Total Owned
22 21 10 08
20 19 20 km per day, 5 Rickshaw driver has income
13
10 whereas 24 % of Owned Auto 0 between 600-799 Rs Per Day .
10 <400 401-599 600-799 800-1000 >1000
3 Rickshaw is operating 60-80 km
0 per day. OWNED AUTO RICKSHAW RENTED AUTO RICKSHAW
<40 40-60 60-80 80-100 >100
7.8

Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan

Existing Expressway
National Highway
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
Railway 8.TERMINAL Jodhpur

Jaipur
Ratangarh
251
350
134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27

Rajasthan
-
Rajasthan
Bikaner District

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1
INTERSTATE BUS TERMINAL PROFILE-BIKANER
LOCATION MAP OF TERMINAL INTER & INTRA STATE BUS ROUTES
Bikaner Roadways bus stand is located in the northern side of

Suratgarh-Bikaner (4lane divided ) road.
Bus Terminal Owned & Operated Area (ha)
Bikaner Roadways RSRTC 4.8
Bus Terminal (Rajasthan State Road
Transport
STATE WISECorporation)
BUS SHARE
State Buses % Bus Share
Delhi 14 5%
Ahmedabad 8 3% Towards Punjab, Bhadra
Nokha, Jodhpur, Bhinmal, Udaipur, Khetwadi,
Punjab 12 4% Ajmer, Kota, Chittogarh, Palana, Hanumangarh (Rajasthan),NH-62
Haryana 16 5% Rtangarh
Rajasthan 248 83%
Number of RSRTC 288 100% Towards Hissar, Rewari, Haryana, Delhi Towards Khajuwala,
regional buses Anoopgarh
Deeksha
ANALYSIS
BUS TERMINAL
Singh,
SPA/NS/TP- 735
8.1
INTERSTATE BUS TERMINAL PROFILE-BIKANER
OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF RSRTC OUTER CORDON RSRTC BUS INFLOW OUTFLOW
TERMINAL INFERENCES
1. The total inflow of RSRTC
buses = 233
2. The total outflow of RSRTC
OC 4 OC 1
buses = 353
3. The maximum number of
Bus inflow trips was
occurring from OC-3,
Zone-86 (Sehrun, Nagaur,
Ajmer, Bherookhera),
OC 5
OC 2 which is 68.
4. The bus outflow was
captured from Bikaner to
Zone-82 (Nokha,
Deshnok) and Zone-83,
OC 3
Jodhpur
Source: Secondary data from RSRTC terminal, Bikaner
5. The OC-1 has the bus
Total no. of buses Arriving at terminal- 143 outflow from Bikaner to
Total no. of buses Departure from terminal- 145 Zone-88 (Ganganagar,
Suratgarh)
As per Primary survey, 26 bus trips in peak hour was observed 6. The OC-2 has the bus
between : 4: 00 PM - 5:00 PM Source: Primary Origin-Destination survey Cordon Points,
outflow from zone- 85
Bikaner
Duration of survey : 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM (Palaudi) to Zone-90
OD MATRIX FOR GOVT. BUSES (24 Hr.)- Vehicular Trips (Haridwar)
7. Zone-81 (Dungarghar) to
O/D 76 79 81 82 83 84 85 87 88 90 95 Total Zone-87 (Jaipur)
77 31 31
79 15 15 OC Avg. Passen
80 4 4 Points Passeng ger
81 26 26 er Trips
82 16 16 Occupa
85 26 45 71 ncy
86 16 68 83
88 21 21 Bichhwal 43.7 3846
90 16 44 60 Jaipur 43.8 11475
Total Passenger Demand 4464 95 26 21 16 53 53 37 53 258 Nagaur 45.2 8271
Passenger volume in peak hour 531
Anoopga 42.7 3373
Peak hour number of buses 26
rh
(4:00 PM – 5:00 PM)
Total 26 21 16 53 53 16 53 26 53 26 244 586 Jaisalmer 48.9 3863
Bus occupancy 20
Deeksha
ANALYSIS
BUS TERMINAL
Singh,
SPA/NS/TP- 735
8.2
INTER & INTRA BUS TRIPS
NO. OF BUS PERCENTAGE OF PASSENGER
S.NO. LOCATION TRIPS BUS TRIP TRIPS
1 NOKHA, RAJASTHAN 149 25.6 6739
2 JODHPUR, RAJASTHAN 69 11.8 3017
3 AJMER, RAJASTHAN 32 5.5 1698
4 JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN 26 4.5 1493
5 ANOOPGARH, RAJASTHAN 25 4.3 1395
6 RATANGARH, RAJASTHAN 32 5.5 1306
7 GANGANAGAR, RAJASTHAN 28 4.8 1117
8 SURATGARH, RAJASTHAN 20 3.4 871
HANUMANGARH,
9 RAJASTHAN 21 3.6 899
10 JALORE, RAJASTHAN 17 2.9 833
11 PHILODI, RAJASTHAN 16 2.7 694
12 HISSAR, HARYANA 14 2.4 498
13 DELHI 14 2.4 513
14 BHILWARA, RAJASTHAN 14 2.4 485
15 BHINMAL, RAJASTHAN 10 1.7 486
16 BHADRA, RAJASTHAN 10 1.7 435
17 KHAJUWALA, RAJASTHAN 10 1.7 424
18 REWARI, HARYANA 8 1.4 249
19 UDAIPUR, RAJASTHAN 8 1.4 257
20 BANWARA, RAJASTHAN 8 1.4 249
21 CHITTORGARH, RAJASTHAN 8 1.4 257
22 BHATINDA 8 1.4 248
23 KOTA, RAJASTHAN 8 1.4 257
24 PALANA, RAJASTHAN 2 0.3 128
25 AHMEDABAD 2 0.3 128
26 CHANDIGARH 2 0.3 124
27 KILCHOO, RAJASTHAN 2 0.3 128
28 JAISALMER, RAJASTHAN 2 0.3 139
29 RAWALA, RAJASTHAN 2 0.3 139
30 KALU, RAJASTHAN 2 0.3 124
31 DASORI, RAJASTHAN 2 0.3 139
32 SANGANAGAR, RAJASTHAN 2 0.3 124
33 PANCHU, RAJASTHAN 2 0.3 128
34 KAROLI, RAJASTHAN 2 0.3 124
35 GHARSANA, RAJASTHAN 1 0.2 61
36 KESARPURA, RAJASTHAN 1 0.2 64
37 SARGEELAPAR, RAJASTHAN 1 0.2 69
38 SALASAR, RAJASTHAN 1 0.2 62
TOTAL 583 100.0 26103
Deeksha
ANALYSIS
BUS TERMINAL
Singh,
SPA/NS/TP- 735
8.3
RSRTC BUS TERMINAL LAYOUT
TERMINAL CHARACTERISTICS
STATION AREA EXISTING AREA/UNIT
Terminal Area 21939.6 sqm (2.1 ha) --
Administrative Block (G+1) 938.7 sqm 10sqm/person
Inter District/State Toilet 204.6 sqm 4sqm/fixture
Terminal AC Waiting Room 210.9 sqm 2sqm/person
Bus Circulation+ parking 17,978.44 sqm 81sqm/bus
space
Bus Depot Shops 806.53 sqm 1.5sqm/person
Private Modes Parking 468.9 sqm 2ECS/100sqm
Administrative DEPOT CHARACTERISTICS

Block EXISTING AREA/UNIT
Depot Area 27642.4 sqm (2.7 -
4 ha)
Workshop Office
Workshop office 146 sqm 20 sq.m.
Maintenance Area 1372 sqm 140sq.m./bay
DEPOT Diesel fuelling dispenser 94.4 sqm 3 sq.m. (min. for 1 dispenser)
Parking Area
Washing/Cleaning Area 223.9 sqm (15m x 4m) = 60 sq.m.
BUS
Source: Shakti Guidelines
PARKIN
G
WORKSHOP 7
OFFICE CIRCULATION
AREA
TOILET
5
6
1 Passenger entrance 5 Toilet block Bus exit
3 Bus bays Bus Parking 2 Bus entrance Waiting Area 6 Depot Entrance gate
Inferences
• Diesel fuelling stations, Washing/Cleaning areas has
TERMINAL BOUNDARY been provided on site, but it is not functioning.
• Average water consumption per bus per day = 150liters
• Total water requirement per day liters = (total fleet
4 Maintenance area Parking area size/2) = 21600 liters/day
Deeksha
ANALYSIS
BUS TERMINAL
Singh,
SPA/NS/TP- 735
8.4
Shops
AC Waiting room
Ticket counter
E-ticketing
Bank GROUND FLOOR PLAN Conflict Point-3
The conflict was observed between pedestrians
and Bus entrance as people board bus from the
entrance itself.
Conflict Point-4
2-wheeler & 4wheeler are parked beside the bus
bays and the platform and outside the
terminal entrance
Conflict Point-1
The vehicular conflict was observed outside the
terminal exit point, due to informal IPT stand
with the city traffic.
2 ISSUES
▪ There is no separate entry exist for private
4 vehicles.
Conflict Point-2
▪ Separate entry and exit area for Vehicle
There is a conflict of passenger entrance due to passengers is not included in the existing
the private modes design.
▪ Unavailability of footpaths inside the terminal
Total number of existing Bus Bays 9
for passenger movements.
Peak hour bus demand 33 ▪ There is no such facilities for physically
Dwell time 20 min Regional Bus movement challenged people.
Private mode movement
In 1 hour bus can accommodate 3 bus
Pedestrian movement
Number of required Bus bays = 33/3
Conflicts point
= 11 bays
Deeksha
ANALYSIS
BUS TERMINAL
Singh,
SPA/NS/TP- 735
8.5
LASTMILE TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS OF USERS
Survey location: RSRTC terminal (Regional buses) Sample size – 213

Boarding- 61%, Alighting – 39%
Inferences
It can be observed that 57% of the commuters
using Interdistrict buses, as majority of the people
coming form suburb and villages from Bichhwal,
Hanumangarh, Ganganagar.
In the egress trip, 28% people are returning back

to their native town villages.
PNB hospital is the major purpose for medical both
in the access and egree trip.
Deeksha
ANALYSIS
BUS TERMINAL
Singh,
SPA/NS/TP- 735
8.6
Freight Terminal
Transport Nagar Bikaner KEY MAP
Transport
Nagar
LEGENDS
Residential
Commercial
PSP
ICAR-Central
FIMTTC, Bikaner
National Highway 11
Institute for Arid
Horticulture, Roads
Bikaner
B A - Main entrance to Some transport agencies have their own loading

D transport nagar unloading areas
A
D
LRS Beechwal
Krishi Vigyan
Kendra Bichwal
C
B - NH 11 along While others use the roads as their loading
transport nagar unloading zones
Sources
• Primary Survey
• Data Analysis
LPG Corporation
C – No street lights and sudden median on NH 11 is a major cause of truck

accidents in the area
D – Open spaces are used as parking as there is no specific parking area

Freight Terminal
Presented By-
Robin Singh 8.7
Freight Terminal - Introduction
Circulation map of Transport Nagar, Bikaner Landuse of Transport Nagar in Bikaner KEY MAP
20m ROW
16m ROW
16m ROW
18m ROW
18m ROW
18m ROW
A’ 16m ROW
A
LEGENDS
16m ROW
16m ROW
Road Hierarchy of Transport Nagar in
18m ROW
18m ROW
Bikaner
18m ROW
16m ROW
16m ROW
C’ C
B
20m ROW
B’
Sources
Parking Capacity Road Sections • Primary Survey
Total parking area 21020 m2 • Data Analysis
1 ECS for Car 23 m2

1 ECS for LCV (1.5) 34.5 m2
1 ECS for Trucks (2.2) 50.6 m2
1 ECS for MAV (2.5) 57.5 m2
70 Cars 215 HCV
No. of vehicles that can be
95 LCVs 85 MAVs
parked here
465 Vehicles
Parking at spot time (13/02/2023 at 9 am)
LCV 2 Axle Truck 3 Axle Truck MAV Others Total
31 74 83 61 18 267
Parking at spot time (13/02/2023 at 12 pm)
63 95 99 88 33 378

Freight Terminal
Presented By-
Robin Singh 8.8
Freight Terminal – OD Survey Analysis
KEY MAP
LEGENDS
• Majority of the
commodities going
out of Bikaner are
Food grains,
vegetables and fruits
followed by consumer
goods
• While majority of the
goods coming in
Bikaner a industrial raw
material followed by
food grains and
consumer goods
Mode wise distribution of commodity Mode wise distribution off commodity

Sources
100% 100%
90% 90% • Primary Survey
• Data Analysis
80% 80%
70% 70%
60% 60%
50% 50%
40% 40%
30% 30%
20% 20%
10% 10%
0% 0%
LCV 2 Axle Truck 3 Axle Truck MAV MAV 3 Axle Truck 2 Axle Truck LCV
Food Grains Vegetables/Fruit Industrial Material Building Material Food Grains Vegetables/Fruit Industrial Material Building Material
Consumer Goods Milk/Dairy product Chemical/Oil Consumer Goods Milk/Dairy product Chemical/Oil

Freight Terminal
Presented By-
Robin Singh 8.9
Freight Terminal – Operator Survey Analysis
Transport Nagar Bikaner – Operator Characteristics Facilities (URDPFI Guideline) In our scenario Remarks
KEY MAP
Transport agencies Y 128 Agencies
Commodity Handled
Circulation Y These 3 spaces
Food Grains • Almost half of the Parking Y can not be
4%
commodities handled in segregated
Transport Nagar Bikaner is Open spaces Y
Vegetables/Fruit
Food grains, Vegetables Service centers Y
8% 15%
and fruits. Toilets N
Industrial Material
At the main
• Followed by Consumer Police station Y entrance along
Building Material 31% Goods with a share of 31%. NH11
34% Restaurant Y 4 Restaurant
Consumer Goods • Based on the operator INFERENCES
4%4% survey data analysis the Shops Y
Milk/Dairy product whole area handles an Godowns Y • Total tonnage
estimate daily tonnage of handled in Transport
2 km toward
Chemical/Oil 4512.64 tonnes. Petrol Pump N Nagar is 4512.64
the city
tonnes/day
Stalls/Dhabas Y
Employment Generated / 100 m2 2.23 IN OUT Administrative office N • Circulation, parking
Tonnage handled / 100 m2 12.19 Tonnes/day 6.65 Tonnes/day 5.54 Tonnes/day 5 km toward and open spaces can
Fire Station N
the city not be segregated
Total Tonnage handled 4512.64 Tonnes/day 2461.44 Tonnes/day 2052.2 Tonnes/day
Post Office N
Costing • No toilets in the area
Based on Tonnage Rs. 1850/Ton Dispensary N
Based on Lead Rs.62.5/Km Bank N • No fire station, post
Bus Station N office dispensary or
Loading cost Rs 125/Ton
bus stop in the area
Unloading cost Rs 125/Ton Electric Substation Y
Cold Storage N • The nearest weigh
Transport Nagar Bikaner – In Flow Spare Parts Shop Y bridge in in Bichwal
Mode Average Tonnage Mode Distribution Total Tonnage Total Vehicular Trips Body Building Shops Y Industrial area which is
LCV 4 10% 246.14 62 5 km towards the city
5 km toward
2 Axle 9.5 28% 689.20 73 Weigh Bridge N Sources
the city
3 Axle 22.5 46% 1132.26 50
• Primary Survey
MAV 27 16% 393.83 15 Transport Nagar Bikaner – Issues • Data Analysis
Total 2461.44 199
• National Highway 11 lacks street lights which
Transport Nagar Bikaner – Out Flow causes visibility issues for truck drives
• A lot of trucks are parked on the National
Mode Average Tonnage Mode Distribution Total Tonnage Total Vehicular Trips
highway special along the road connecting
LCV 4 30% 615.36 154
Bichwal industrial area to transport nagar.
2 Axle 12.5 23% 471.78 38
• Open spaces used as parking, without proper
3 Axle 22.5 27% 553.82 25
bay line trucks are parked in a haphazard
MAV 28.5 20% 410.24 14 manner
Total 2051.2 197 • Trucks are parked on the street even when the
process of loading-unloading hasn’t started
216 LCV 29 MAVs causing problems for the operator whose shop is
Estimate Parking Requirement nearby
186 Trucks
• Lack of water and sewage facilities in the area.

Freight Terminal
Presented By-
Robin Singh 8.10
RAILWAY TERMINAL
LOCATION OF STATION
4W Parking
2W Parking 60 cars
(Underground)
156 2W PICK UP & DROP OFF
(AUTO RICKSHAWS)
1 66 auto rickshaws
1
PICK UP & DROP

Lalgarh Junction ZONE (CARS)
Bikaner Junction
2W Parking
150 2W
AREA UNDER BIKANER JUNCTION The Bikaner PICK UP & DROP OFF
3
railway station is a (AUTO RICKSHAWS)
junction of railway 70 auto rickshaws
lines from three
BIKANER JUNCTION Directions. :
❑ Bikaner-
Jaisalmer
STATION ENTRY POINTS
❑ Bikaner- PICK UP & DROP S. No Road ROW
Nagaur\Jaipur ZONE (CARS) 1 Bikaner- Napasar Road 9m
❑ Bikaner-
Suratgarh
2 Station Road (Towards 12m
Kote Gate)
3 Station Road (Towards 12m
Rani Bazar)
AREA DISTRIBUTION AREA SUB-CATEGORY

S. No Use Area (sqm) Zone S. No Railway Area (sq.m) Area % Zone
1 Car Parking 1336 60 Cars Parking/ Auto Station Area
2 2 Wheeler Parking 1762 306 2W Stands 1 Station 17318 65.66% Core
Building
TRAIN 3 Auto Stands 1584 137 Auto
2 Circulation 2053 7.78% Access/
MAINTENANCE AREA 4 Circulation zone for 2053 Access/
3 Parking 7004 26.56% Dispersal
passengers Dispersal
5 Area Utilised by Cantonment 2322 26,375 100%

School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Introduction SHIVANSH SINGH 8.11
OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS & PASSENGER OD SURVEY
OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS Hourly Flow of Trains on the busiest day (Thursday)
It Is Categorized as A1 Station Frequency of Trains 7
Bikaner Junction: ▪ Platforms:06 6
No. of Origin Trains: 30 ▪ Railway tracks :8 5
No. of Destined Trains: 31 4
▪ Foot over bridge:2 3
No. of passing through trains: 18 ▪ Entry& exit: 3 30, 38% 2
Total No. of trains: 79 ▪ Station building area: 20,026 sqm 1
49, 62% 0
07:00-08:00
08:00-09:00
09:00-10:00
10:00-11:00
11:00-12:00
12:00-13:00
13:00-14:00
14:00-15:00
15:00-16:00
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
18:00-19:00
19:00-20:00
20:00-21:00
21:00-22:00
22:00-23:00
23:00-00:00
03-00 - 04:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
00:00 - 01:00
ANNUAL FOOTFALL: 1744592
Daily Footfall Category: Less
Total number of Passengers Per Day Is 5815.307 ≈ 5820
than 10000. Daily Other
(As per Bikaner Junction Report) (source: NWR Cleanliness Report)
Arrival Departure Total
RAILWAY PASSENGER O-D SURVEY

• Railway Passenger O-D Survey was carried out at Bikaner Junction from BOARDING: 62% NEW CITY SIDE: 57%
Morning 7 am to 5 pm. ALIGHTING: 38% OLD CITY SIDE: 43%
• 278 samples were collected from both the sides of the station.
MODES PREFERRED PURPOSE OF VISIT

Taxi Other Walk 6. Two 7. Car 8. Taxi Bus 1. Walk 12. 8. 9. Other 8. 9. Other
Car 2% Cycle
1% 6% Wheele 4% 3% 1% 7% Private Religious 2% Religious 1%
6% Bus Rickshaw
r Car 2% 3% 1. Work
6% 1% 10. Tourist
1. Work 7. Return
BOARDING
3% 7. Return
ALIGHTING
13% 17%
BOARDING
2 4% 10.
ALIGHTING
Shared Home 20% Home
Wheeler Tourist
Auto 19% 18%
12% 3%
27% 5. 2. 2.
Shared 4. Auto Education 6. Social Education
Auto Ricksha 6. Social 8% 22% 21%
Auto 18% 5. 30% 3. 5.
Rickshaw w
Recreation 4. Business Recreatio 3. 4.
39% 51%
al Shopping7% nal BusinessShopping
6% 2% 6% 8% 1%
Auto rickshaw and shared auto is the most preferred Social is the most occurring purpose with around 26%
mode with 62.5% share together. share all together.
PASSENGERS FACILITIES AS PER MODERN STATION SCEHEME
S.NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Items Upgradation of
Computerized Upgradation of
Improvement in Improvement in counters in
Train Running Pay and Use Kota stone Waiting Hall, Coach Indication Renovation of
the facade of the circulating Cleanliness Lighting Signage Booking &
Indication Board toilets flooring Waiting Room, Board Water Booths
the station area. Reservation
(TRIB) retiring Room
Offices
Status Mechanized Partially
Completed Completed Provided Provided Provided Not Provided Completed Completed Not Completed Provided
Cleaning Completed

School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Analysis SHIVANSH SINGH 8.12
RAILWAY TERMINAL
DISTRIBUTION OF TRIP BY MODE FOR BOARDING PASSENGERS (EXPANDED FOR 5820 PASSENGERS)
Return Home
Recreational
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Education
Shopping
Religious
Business
Tourist
Others
BOARDING PASSENGERS
Social
Mode/ Work
Total
Purpose
Walk 63 10% 21 3% 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 8% 42 6 0 0 21 17% 0 0 209
Cycle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cycle Rickshaw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shared Auto 188 31% 356 47% 42 15% 0 0 42 20% 147 19% 188 29% 0 0 0 0 0 0 963
Auto
Rickshaw 209 34% 293 39% 147 54% 42 100% 63 30% 251 32% 251 39% 21 20% 84 67% 21 100% 1382
2 Wheeler 63 10% 42 6% 21 8% 0 0 42 20% 147 19% 84 13% 21 20% 0 0 0 0 419
Car 0 0 42 6% 42 15% 0 0 21 10% 105 14% 21 3% 0 0 0 0 0 0 230
Taxi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 3% 0 0 42 20% 21 17% 0 0 84
Bus 42 7% 0 0 21 8% 0 0 42 20% 42 5% 42 6% 42 40% 0 0 0 0 230
Other 21 3% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 3% 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
Total 586 100% 754 100% 272 100% 42 100% 209 100% 775 100% 649 100% 105 100% 126 100% 21 100%
DISTRIBUTION OF TRIP BY MODE FOR BOARDING PASSENGERS (EXPANDED FOR 5820 PASSENGERS)
400
Inferences:
350 • Auto Rickshaw (1382) and shared auto (963) are the most
preferred mode for first mile connectivity.
300 • Work, Education, Social and Return Home is the most
250
occurring purpose.
• 2 Wheeler is the second most preferred mode to commute
200 to station.
• Taxi (84) is the least preferred mode.
150
100 *Bus (230) denotes people alighting at bus station and coming
to train station by Auto/Shared Auto.
50
0
Work Education Business Shopping Recreational Social Return Religious Tourist Others
Home
Walk Cycle Cycle Rickshaw Shared Auto Auto Rickshaw 2 Wheeler Car Taxi Bus Other

RAILWAY TERMINAL
DISTRIBUTION OF TRIP BY MODE FOR ALIGHTING PASSENGERS (EXPANDED FOR 5820 PASSENGERS)
Return Home
Recreational
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Education
Shopping
Religious
Business
Tourist
Others
ALIGHTING PASSENGERS
Social
Mode/ Work
Total
Purpose
Walk 84 18% 0 0 21 13% 0 0 0 0 42 6% 21 5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 167
Cycle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cycle Rickshaw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shared Auto 147 32% 21 11% 0 0 21 50% 0 0 126 19% 105 24% 0 0 0 0 0 0 419
Auto
Rickshaw 147 32% 105 56% 126 75% 21 50% 105 83% 335 50% 167 38% 42 100% 63 75% 42 100% 1151
2 Wheeler 42 9% 63 33% 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 22% 42 10% 0 0 0 0 0 0 293
Car 0 0 0 0 21 13% 0 0 0 0 21 3% 105 24% 0 0 0 0 0 0 147
Taxi 21 5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 17% 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 25% 0 0 63
Bus 21 5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 461 100% 188 100% 167 100% 42 100% 126 100% 670 100% 440 100% 42 100% 84 100% 42 100%
DISTRIBUTION OF TRIP BY MODE FOR ALIGHTING PASSENGERS (EXPANDED FOR 5820 PASSENGERS)
400
Inferences:
350 • Auto Rickshaw (1151) and shared auto (419) are the most
preferred mode for last mile connectivity.
300 • Social and Work is the most occurring purpose.
• 2 Wheeler is the second most preferred mode to commute
250
from the station.
200 • Taxi (63) is the least preferred mode.
150 *Bus (21) denotes people alighting at bus station and coming
to train station by Auto/Shared Auto.
100
50
0
Work Education Business Shopping Recreational Social Return Home Religious Tourist Others
Walk Cycle Cycle Rickshaw Shared Auto Auto Rickshaw 2 Wheeler Car Taxi Bus Other

RAILWAY TERMINAL
FREQUENCY BY PURPOSE FOR BOARDING PASSENGERS FREQUENCY BY PURPOSE FOR ALIGHTING PASSENGERS
Recreational
Return Home
Recreational
Total/ Freq.
Education
Shopping
Education
Religious
Business
Shopping
Religious
Business
Return
Tourist
Tourist
Others
Home
Other
Social
Work
Frequency/
Social
Frequency/
Work
Purpose Purpose
1- Daily 42 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 126 Daily 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63
2- Weekly 42 0 84 0 0 21 42 21 0 0 209 Weekly 84 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 105
3- Monthly 188 21 167 126 21 63 126 105 21 0 837 Monthly 230 0 42 105 0 0 105 84 0 21 586
4- Occassionally 230 63 356 84 21 84 482 419 42 21 1800 Occasionally 21 84 105 42 42 105 440 272 42 21 1172
5- Yearly 105 42 84 63 0 42 126 105 21 0 586 Yearly 63 0 42 0 0 21 126 84 0 0 335
607 126 754 272 42 209 775 649 105 21 Total/ Purpose 461 84 188 167 42 126 670 440 42 42
FREQUENCY BY PURPOSE FOR BOARDING PASSENGERS FREQUENCY BY PURPOSE FOR ALIGHTING PASSENGERS
600
500
500 400
400 300
300 200
200 100
0
100
1- Daily 2- Weekly 3- Monthly 4- Occassionally 5- Yearly

1- Daily 2- Weekly 3- Monthly 4- Occassionally 5- Yearly
Parking Bay Gap

GAP IN PARKING BAY FACILITIES (Pick up & Drop)
Passenger
Share Required Available Required Available
Peak Hour Calculation Percentage share of passengers by mode (In no. in Space Space Space (Old Space
Footfall 5820 Mode Mode peak hour) (New City) (New city) City) (Old city Gap
Walk Bus Car Auto Shared Auto Two Wheeler Taxi Other
Trains 28 Car 94 14 60 10 NA* 10
% share 6.47 4.32 6.47 43.53 23.74 12.23 2.52 0.72 Auto 631 90 66 68 70 24
Avg. Passengers per train 207.8571
Peak Hour Passengers 1449 Occupancy 3 3 4.2 1 3 Shared
Auto 344 50 NA 37 NA NA
Avg. passenger per train= Daily Footfall/No. of trains Two
*method of calculation by “comprehensive method for passenger
Peak hour passengers= Avg. passengers per train/ No. of trains in peak hour* Wheeler 177 50 156 39 150 Surplus
amenities at station dated 09-04-2018” provided by MOR.
Taxi 36 7 NA 6 NA NA

RAILWAY TERMINAL
PASSENGERS COMING BY BUS

FLOW OF PASSENGERS TO AND FROM THE STATION
3.5 KM
RSRTC Bikaner Jn.
BUS Stand Railway Station
Using auto
External Zones/
Rickshaw
Districts
Name of zone/ Distance No. of
District (KM) Passengers
Z76 30 21
Z77 35 84 251 Passengers coming
Z78 30 42 from external zones
Z79 25 21
Anupgarh District 150 21
Nagaur District 120 42
Phalodi District 160 21
FREQUENCY BY PURPOSE FOR PASSENGERS COMING BY BUS

Work Business Social Return Home Religious Total/
Frequency
Daily 21 21 42
Monthly 21 21
Yearly 42 21 42 105
Occasionally 42 21 21 84
EXTERNAL ZONES
Total/Purpose 105 21 42 42 42
Name of zone/ District Distance No. of Trips
COMPARISION OF BIKANER JN. WITH NEARBY STATIONS (KM)
Name of Station Originating Trains Terminating Train Passing Trains Z76 (Napasar) 30 21
Bikaner 30 31 18 Z77 (Sangreh, Palana,
Gigasar) 35 84
Anupgarh 5 5 0
Z78 (Nal, Daiya) 30 42
Phalodi 0 0 18 Z79 (Shobhasar) 25 21
Nagaur 0 0 48 Anupgarh District 150 21
Bikaner Junction has most number of originating and terminating trains, while other stations Nagaur District 120 42
have almost none.
Phalodi District 160 21


Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan

Existing Expressway
National Highway
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
Railway 9.PARKING Jodhpur

Jaipur
Ratangarh
251
350
134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27

Rajasthan
-
Rajasthan
Bikaner District

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1
PARKING LOCATIONS
AREA(IN
LOCATIONS TYPE ABUTTING LAND USE
➢ There are total six parking locations in Sq.m)
Bikaner which are situated in core area of
SHASAN COURT OFF STREET PSP 5700
the city.
RATAN RATAN BIHARI OFF STREET COMMERCIAL 2820
BIHARI ➢ There are four off- street parking and two
OFF STREET KOTE GATE SABJI MANDI OFF STREET COMMERCIAL 480
are On -street parking.
PARKING
BIKANER RAILWAY OFF STREET TRANSPORTATION 3098
➢ These locations having commercial, PSP JUNCTION
JUNAGAR SHASHAN COURT
abutting land use. JUNAGARH FORT ON STREET PSP 600
H FORT ON OFF STREET
STREET PARKING PBM HOSPITAL ON STREET PSP 1400
PARKING
6 1
PARKING
2
4 TYPE(ON/ PARKING PARKING INDEX
3 MODE(2W/4 PEAK PARKING PARKING PARKING
LOCATION OFF ACCUMUL VOLUME VOLUME PERCENTA
5 W&OTHERS) HOUR LOAD(ECS.HR) TUROVER INDEX
STREET) ATION (vehicle/Day) (ECS) GE
PBM
HOSPITAL 2W 3:00-4:00 38 82 20.5 67.5 3.28 0.73 73%
ON STREET 5.PBM
KATE GATE PARKING HOSPITAL ON STREET 4W 1:30-2:30
15
35 35 107 2.33 0.54 54%
SABJI
MANDI RAILWAY 18
3W 1:00-2:00 22 0.6 35.4 1.8 0.66 66%
OFF STREET JUNCTION
PARKING OFF STREET 2W 12:00-1:00 35 52 13 49 2.16 0.72 72%
6.JUNAGARH
PARKING ON STREET
FORT
4W 3:00-4:00 10 28 28 80 1.88 0.53 53%
❑ OFF STREET PARKING LOCATIONS -4
3W 1:00-2:00 12 18 10.8 34.2 1.5 0.6 60%
❑ ON STREET PARKING LOCATIONS -2
TYPE(ON/OFF MODE(2W/4W& PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING INDEX

LOCATION PEAK HOUR ACCUMULATION PARKING TURNOVER PARKING INDEX
STREET) OTHERS) VOLUME(vehicle/Day) VOLUME(ECS) LOAD(ECS.HR) PERCENTAGE
(vehicle)
OFF STREET 2W 2:00-3:00 60 212 53 50 4.09 0.86 86%
1. SHASHAN COURT OFF STREET 4W 2:00-3:00 38 180 180 154 2.72 0.75 75%
OFF STREET 3W &OTHERS 2:00-3:00 20 29 22.6 30 1.36 0.90 90%
OFF STREET 2W 1:00-2:00 30 70 17.5 27.5 1.75 0.75 75%
2.RATAN BIHARI OFF STREET 4W 1:00-2:00 20 80 80 70 2.6 0.66 66%
OFF STREET 3W 1:00-2:00 15 60 15 30 3 0.75 75%
3. KOTE GATE SABJI MANDI OFF STREET 2W 11:00-12:00 155 180 45 50 3.6 1.3 130%
OFF STREET OTHERS 11:00-12:00 18 25 15 12 5 1.6 160%
4. BIKANER RAILWAY
JUNCTION
OFF STREET 2W 5:00-6:00 54 .
80 20 25 1.2 0.67 67%
OFF STREET 4W 5:00-6:00 8 40 40 13.75 1.33 0.66 66%

PARKING LOCATIONS
Presented By- SUDHIR
KUMAR VERMA 9.1
ON-STREET PARKING LOCATIONS
KEY MAP-PARKING SURVEY LOCATIONS 1.ON STREET PARKING AT PBM HOSPITAL 2.ON STREET PARKING AT JUNAGARH FORT
PSP
RATAN BIHARI
OFF STREET
PARKING
JUNAGARH SHASHAN COURT

FORT ON OFF STREET
STREET PARKING
PARKING COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL
61
4 2
3
5
Pre – dominant land use COMMERCIAL Pre – dominant land use PSP
PBM HOSPITAL Parking area 1400 SQ.M. Parking area 600 SQ.M.
ON STREET Parking supply 48 ECS Parking supply 112 ECS
PARKING Peak hour 2:00 – 3:00 Peak hour 3:00 – 4:00
KATE GATE
Peak accumulation 66 ECS Peak accumulation 54 ECS
SABJI
Vehicular distribution 59% (2W), 24% (4W),13%(3W) Vehicular distribution 59% (2W), 24% (4W),17%(3W)
MANDI OFF RAILWAY
Parking load 172 ECS HR Parking load 172 ECS HR
STREET JUNCTION
Parking index 193% Parking index 549%
PARKING OFF STREET
Parking turnover 1.40 Parking turnover 1.20
PARKING
❑ OFF STREET PARKING LOCATIONS -4 PARKING ACCUMULATION PARKING ACCUMULATION

70 60
66 64 54
60 60 59 50
❑ ON STREET PARKING LOCATIONS -2 50 51
56 55 48
45 41 43
40 37 38 40 39 39
34 34 36 33 36
30 30 28 33
❑ Survey Durations- 10 hours(10:00 AM- 6:00 20
16
30
27 28 26
14 13 15 15 14 25 24
PM) 10 12
6
3 5
3 4
9
2
12
3
8
4 8
2
8
7
2
20 22 22 22
15
0 1 12
10 12 8 10
8 5 10 12
6 6 4 5 9 8 7
ABUTTING LAND AREA(IN 0
LOCATIONS TYPE
USE Sq.m)
SHASAN COURT OFF STREET PSP 5700

2w 4w auto others total
RATAN BIHARI OFF STREET COMMERCIAL 2820 2 wheelers 4 wheelers auto total
PARKING DURATION VEHICLE COMPOSITION VEHICLE COMPOSITION
PARKING DURATION
KOTE GATE SABJI OFF STREET COMMERCIAL 480 12% 4%
MANDI 13% 17%
45% 14% 22%
BIKANER RAILWAY OFF STREET TRANSPORTATIO 3098 35%
JUNCTION N 24% 59% 24% 59%
29% 17%
JUNAGARH FORT ON STREET PSP 600
26%
PBM HOSPITAL ON STREET PSP 1400 less thsan 30 min 30min-2hr
less thsan 30 min 30min-2hr 2 wheelers 4 wheelers auto
2hr-4hr above 4hr 2w 4w auto others
2hr-4hr above 4hr

ON-STREET PARKING
LOCATIONS
Presented By-SUDHIR
KUMAR VERMA 9.2
OFF-STREET PARKING LOCATIONS
KEY MAP-PARKING SURVEY LOCATIONS 3. Shashan Court 4.Ratan Bihari 5.Kote Gate 6.Railway Terminal
RATAN BIHARI
OFF STREET PSP
PARKING
57m
JUNAGARH SHASHAN COURT
FORT ON OFF STREET
PARKING
m
100
STREET PARKING
PARKING BUILTUP
1 PARKING PSP
432 6 PSP
RAILWAY JUNCTION
5 PBM HOSPITAL
ON STREET
PARKING
KATE GATE
SABJI
MANDI OFF RAILWAY
STREET JUNCTION
PARKING OFF STREET COMMERCIAL
PARKING
Shashan Court Ratan Bihari Railway Terminal

LOCATIONS Kote Gate
Pre – dominant land use PSP PSP Commercial Transportation
Parking area 5700 SQ.M 2820 SQ.M 480 SQ.M 3.98 SQ.M
Parking Supply 243 ECS 123 ECS 21 ECS 134

Peak Hour 1:00PM- 2:00 PM 2:00PM- 3:00PM 11:00PM- 12:00 PM 1:00PM- 2:
48 45 173 44
Peak Accumulation
2W(21%),4W(70%),LCV(5%),3W(4%) 2W(49%),4W(46%),3W(5%) 2W(88%),Cycle(8%),3W(4%) 2W(65%),4W(35%)
Vehicular Distribution
236% 110% 523% 101%
Parking Index
Parking turnover 0.48 0.23 2.62 0.24
PARKING ACCUMULATION (ECS) PARKING ACCUMULATION (ECS) PARKING ACCUMULATION(ECS) PARKING ACCUMULATION(ECS)
60 20
17.65
50 47.9 50 14.8 16.05 25
1. PARKING ACCUMULATION: Number of vehicles parked 45 42.3 42.65 40.95 45.1 15 14 23
40 41.05 40 36.7 12.8 16.25 20
35 36.7 36 33 31.55 32 11.55 12.3 19 18.5
at a given instant of time. 30 33 31 30 29 26.7 13 12 13.25 10.8 15 16.5 15.5 14.25 14 15 15.5 16
28 28 24.9 24.8 24 22 22.2522.45 10 11.25 14
20 22 20 19 16 10.5 10 11 12
16 18 15 10 10 10
10 8.25 7.5 7.75 9.5 6.25 5.25 5 8
6.25 5 8
7.5 7
2. PARKING VOLUME: Total number of vehicles parked at a 10 7 7.5 9.5 9.5 3
2.4 5.75
1.2 4
1.2 1.8 3 5.5
1.2 1.2 5 4.5 5.5
3 6.25 6 6.5 5 0 1 0 0.6 1 1
0 0 4 3.5
0 1.8 1.2 2.4 1.8 2.4 1.8 1.8 0.6 2.4
given duration of time. 0
0.8 1.2 0.2 0. 0
0 0.5 0.6 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.3
0 0.6 1.2
3. PARKING LOAD: (area under the accumulation curve)
The number of vehicles occupying the parking area at
each time interval with the time interval. 2W 4W 3W TOTAL 2W 4W LCV 3W TOTAL 2W 3W CYCLE TOTAL
2W 4W TOTAL
4. AVERAGE PARKING DURATION: The ratio of total vehicle PARKING DURATION VEHICLE COMPOSITION
hours to the number of vehicles parked Parking Duration
VEHICLE COMPOSITION
PARKING DURATION VEHICLE COMPOSITION PARKING DURATION VEHICLE COMPOSITION
4% 5% 8%
3% 6% 4%
5. PARKING TURNOVER: The ratio of number of vehicles 8% 5% 9%
5% 21% 25% 35%
parked in a duration to the number of parking bays 43% 22%
available. 27% 49%
26% 6% 65%
60%
61% 46%
6. PARKING INDEX: (occupancy or efficiency) The ratio of 64% 9%
88% 26%
number of bays occupied in a time duration to the 70%
total less thsan 30 min 30min-2hr less thsan 30 min 30min-2hr

less thsan 30 min 30min-2hr
2W 4W
less thsan 30 min 30min-2hr 2W 4W LCV 3W 2hr-4hr above 4hr
2hr-4hr above 4hr 2W 4W 3W 2hr-4hr above 4hr 2W 3W CYCLE
2hr-4hr above 4hr

OFF-STREET PARKING
LOCATIONS
Presented By-SUDHIR
KUMAR VERMA 9.3

Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan

Existing Expressway
National Highway
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
10.NON MOTORISED TRASNPORT AND PEDESTRIAN Railway

Jodhpur
Jaipur
Ratangarh
251
350
134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27

Rajasthan
-
Rajasthan
Bikaner District

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1
Existing Footpath Map
Existing Footpath Availability (km)
Road Road length Footpath

Hierarchy (km) availability (km)
Arterial 81.82 9.9

Sub-Arterial 132.92 4.8
Collector 212.08 8.5
Total 426.83 23.2 (5.43%)
• Walk Trips share comprises of 24% of total trips

share
• Availability of footpath is about 23.2 km which is

about 5.43% of total road network.
• Majority of footpath has been observed in poor

infrastructure and encroached condition except
sadar thana road that is observed in good
condition.
• The footpath is paved wherever available.

• About 8% (about 40km) of footpath available is
both of total road network.
• Majority of footpath has encroached by parking

purpose and vendors.
Existing Footpath (1.2m Width)

Existing Footpath (1.5m Width)
Existing Footpath (2m Width)
Existing Footpath is in the Periphery of Junagrah Fort with width of 1.5m,Phad bazar(width 1.2m) and Main karimsar road(2m width),
Majority of the footpath is being encroached by either street vendors or 2-wheeler Parking. Discontinuous footpath- Encroached by Vendors at
Bikaner Chowpatty civil Lines

10.1
Presented By-
Pedestrian
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi Chitwan S Dhakad
Road Sections Existing Pedestrian Infrastructure
1. Dhanpat Road – Section AA’
Map Showing Existing Footpath Condition
The width of Footpath is 1.2m which is not as per standards width of footpath
according to Abutting landuse. As per the commercial Landuse the width of the
footpath should be 2.5m
2. GS Road- Section BB’
The width of Footpath is 1.5m which is not as per standards width of footpath
according to Abutting landuse. As per the Residential Landuse the width of the
footpath should be 1.8m
3. Phad Bazar Road- Section CC’
Footpath width is not as per standards
4. Junagarh Fort Road-- Section DD’

-
Commercial
PSP
Footpath is encroached and not as per standard width according to

abutting landuse Parking on Footpath at
Encroached by Vendors Encroached by Vendors at Encroached by Vendors at
near Junagarh Circle civil Lines civil Lines Bikana chowpatty

10.2
Presented By-
Pedestrian
Walk Trips Share in TAZ
Percentage Share of Walk Trips
Walk Trips
TOTAL WALK TRIPS 1,18,910 Ward_No Walk Trips Total Trips
% Share of Walk
Share in TAZ WITH 24.3 % of walk MODAL
trips
1 2712 14990 18.1
SHARE 2 1109 10139 10.9
3 1317 9342 14.1
TOTAL TRIPS – 4,89,446 4

5
1316
1746
8224
10125
16.0
17.2
Average Trip Length = 6 3699 13317 27.8
0.97Km 7 336 6388 5.3
8 2972 7924 37.5
9 1174 5432 21.6
Average Travel Time = 9.56 10 960 7486 12.8
min 11 3333 8205 40.6
12 2603 6899 37.7
13 444 5548 8.0
14 324 7128 4.5
15 994 6534 15.2
Major Trips Originating from Zones 16 2033 6710 30.3
(25,8,31,53,44,11,47,25,28,20,17,9, 17 2079 6237 33.3
22,18,34,27,20,48,6)toZones(24,7,3 18 1897 11145 17.0
8,48,45,9,46,31,29,19,18,8,4,19,33,2 19 2981 7877 37.8
20 3390 10691 31.7
,26,21,44,5)
21 2123 5483 38.7
22 1966 10027 19.6
Ward No. 47,53, account for 23 1902 7133 26.7
nearly 55% of walk trips of the 24 689 6889 10.0
total trips, with highest share of 25 8507 18481 46.0
work purpose trips, and ward no. 26 159 7929 2.0
46,31 accounts for nearly 66% of 27 2769 7715 35.9
walk trips with highest share of 28 3203 6407 50.0
work purpose trips. of the total 29 1602 4272 37.5
trips. ward No. 11,25,28 accounts 30 1420 4892 29.0
31 3923 6087 64.4
for nearly 40% of walk trips of the
32 1107 6641 16.7
total trips. With highest share of 33 607 5923 10.3
education and work purpose 34 1830 6336 28.9
trips. 35 1751 5838 30.0
36 592 4400 13.5
Less than 10% 37 185 6276 2.9
10-20%’ Ward wise walk trips share 38 568 7570 7.5
20-30%
39 831 11086 7.5
30-40% Percentage 40 2689 10755 25.0
40-50% Ward_No. Walk Trips of Total Walk
50-70% 41 0 6531 0.0
trips 42 255 6259 4.1
25 7091 7.6 43 372 9289 4.0
PURPOSEWISE WALK TRIPS SHARE PURPOSEWISE WALK AVERAGE TRIP LENGTH 53 4050 4.4
44
45
- 4333
1396
13432
6700
32.3
20.8
Average Trip length 46 3838 4.1 46 4605 7163 64.3
0.9 44 3612 3.9 47 3964 7747 51.2
Highest purpose wise 0.8 48 2779 8337 33.3
47 3304 3.6 49 265 3509 7.5
3% 5% Work walk trips share is of 0.7
6% 31 3270 3.5 50 923 6922 13.3
23%
Education Education and work 0.6 51 521 4338 12.0
5% 6 3083 3.3
4% Business purpose, Walk trips share 0.5 52 508 4570 11.1
of zone 31, 46 and 47 is 0.4 20 2826 3.0 53 4859 8793 55.3
Shopping
0.3 11 2778 3.0 54 2361 8156 28.9
Recreational highest and Purpose wise 55 656 3060 21.4
Social average trip length of 0.2 28 2670 2.9 56 0 3653 0.0
0.1
54% Religion work is highest which is 19 2484 2.7 57 875 3646 24.0
0 58 1227 7365 16.7
0.8km. 8 2477 2.7
59 2926 11188 26.2
59 2439 2.6 60 2833 7613 37.2
Total 118,910 489444 24.98

10.3
Presented By-
Pedestrian
Walk Trips Share- Intrazonal and Interzonal
Desire Line Diagram – Interzonal Walk Trips Share 2023 Intrazonal Walk Trips Share
LEGEND
Legends
4000 -3000
3000 -2000
2000 -1000
Interzonal Walk Trips of Top 20 Zones Interzonal Walk Trips of Top 20 Zones Major Trips Originating from Zones Intrazonal Walk Trips of Top 10 Zones Intrazonal Walk Trips of Top 10 Zones
S.No. Origin Destination No. of Trips S.No. Origin Destination No. of Trips (25,8,31,53,44,11,47,25,28,20,17,9,22,18,34,27,20,48, S.No. Zone No. No. of Trips S.No. Zone No. No. of Trips
1 25 24 1712 11 17 18 866 6)toZones(24,7,38,48,45,9,46,31,29,19,18,8,4,19,33,2 1 46 3696 11 59 1578
,26,21,44,5) 12 5 1455
2 8 7 1651 12 9 8 857 2 25 3668
3 31 38 1578 13 22 4 819 3 44 2528 13 40 1426
Ward No. 46 and 25 has highest number of
4 53 48 1157 14 18 19 791 Intrazonal Trips. In ward no. 25 the majority of 4 53 2314 14 16 1356
5 44 45 1084 15 34 33 704 Landuse is Residential, Agricultural. While in ward 5 1 2260 15 31 1353
6 11 9 1069 16 27 2 660 no. 46 the majority of land use is Residential and 6 19 2129 16 21 1180
commercial. Ward No. 1,19 and 45 accounts for 17 35 1136
7 47 46 1051 17 27 26 660 7 12 2061
interzonal trips between 3000-2000 and the 18 11 1069
8 25 31 978 18 20 21 652 majority of landuse in ward no 45 is Residential,
8 60 1992
9 28 29 961 19 48 44 632 9 6 1850 19 47 1051
PSP and Industrial, while the majority of landuse in
10 20 19 869 20 6 5 617 ward no.1 and 19 is Residential 10 54 1610 20 28 1004

10.4
Presented By-
Pedestrian
Mid-Block Volume Count
Point Location Pedestrian Total
s Count per Pedestrian
Hour(Along Volume
Volume) (6:00AM-
7:30PM
M1 State Electricity Board, 17 213
Bikaner
M2 GS road (Bikaner Road) - 4.76 62
4 L Divided
M3 Pushkama Road Stadium 87 1132
Road – 4 L Divided
M4 RSRTC Bus Terminal 30 381

M5 JMD Car Bazar 10.6 138
SL1 Mukteshwar Mahadev 901 11717
Temple
SL2 Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd, 59 767
Old Bikaner Road
SL3 Rajasthan Patrika office 42 528
Screen Line 1 – Mukteshwar Mahadev Temple

Legend
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200 Peak Hour at screen
1000 line1 is 1:00P.M. –
800
02:00P.M. with while
600
400
the pedestrian count
200 is lowest in morning
Peak Hour
0 between 06 A.M.-
07:00A.M.
Abutting Landuse Screen Line 1 Mukteshwar Mahadev Temple

Required width of footpath as per adjacent Landuse
The landuse near screen Minimum obstacle free walkway width and 1.8 m
line 1 – Mukteshwar Residential/ Mixed Use Areas
Mahadev Temple
Commercial/ Mixed Use Areas 2.50 m
is commercial, hence
pedestrian count is more Shopping frontages 3.5 m to 4.5 m
and Right of way is 6.5m.
Most of the Roads are Bus Stops 3m
encroached by the street
vendors and High Intensity Commercial Areas 4m
shopkeepers.

10.5
Presented By-
Pedestrian
CYCLIST OPINION SURVEY ANALYSIS
DISTRIBUTION OF TRIP BY PURPOSE WISE
FACTSHEET Distribution Others 2%
Education • Average trip
16% length- 4.62 kms
of cycle trips
Total No. of TAZ’s (in Study • Maximum travel
74 by Gender
Area)
Recreational length- 12 kms
5%
Religious • Average travel
Total Location of survey 9 97 % Male 2% time- 22 minutes
Work
No. of cycle trips surveyed 89 49% Return home
3 % Female 14%
Cycle Ownership 110
DISTRIBUTION OF TRIPS BY OPINION ON NECESSCITY OF Shopping 10%
Social 2%
AGE OF CYCLE USER SEPARATE CYCLE TRACK
> 45
12% Inferences:
VERY ESSENTIAL 25% Inferences:
17-25 DESIRABLE 35% Work and Educational Cycle trips are the major purpose wise trips with an ATL
35-45 33% 49% were work trips and 16% were Educational trips. 5.2km.and 1.8 km.
NOT REQUIRED 8%
16% DO YOU PREFER … 32%
DISTRIBUTION OF CYCLE Inferences from Households
TRIPS CLASSIFIED BY LENGTH
<= 1kms
25-35 Bikaner City Average Trip Length (ATL) 3.69 km.
11%
39%
1-2 Km
10%
More
Than 5
km
54%
2-5km
25%
Warrant for separate cycle

track:
1) Peak hour cycle traffic
=>400/hr and motor
06:00 AM to 7:30 PM (13.5 Hours) vehicles 100 – 200/hr
SL 1 SL 2 SL 3 MB 1 MB 2 MB 3 MB 4 MB 5
Direction 1 Direction 2 Direction 1 Direction 2 Direction 1 Direction 2 Direction 1 Direction 2 Direction 1 Direction 2 Direction 1 Direction 2 Direction 1 Direction 2 Direction 1 Direction 2
Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle Motorised Cycle
Time (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume) (Volume)
6:00-7:00
7:00-8:00
103
523
19
37
74
377
11
12
134
457
27
39
146
378
16
33
341
578
20
15
329
703
9
19
264
754
8
15
304
905
13
15
103
206
2
7
163
396
12
10
100
282
9
27
168
397
1
26
201
340
9
20
113
279
2
9
206
508
4
10
252
513
11
3
Or
8:00-9:00 1024 82 696 21 708 56 814 46 891 21 1689 70 1117 24 1231 45 589 8 834 19 555 37 627 36 704 32 452 15 963 18 903 22
9:00-10:00 1680 158 589 67 841 56 1126 42 1352 28 2789 110 1616 54 1828 33 702 10 1223 13 875 50 1101 29 1339 39 657 15 1354 19 1098 9
10:00-11:00 1747 159 836 73 775 25 1490 43 1711 13 2788 6 1502 20 1837 27 539 4 840 3 869 29 991 19 1706 25 813 15 1374 8 1833 13
11:00-12:00
12:00-13:00
1981
1842
143
93
1039
1344
99
99
1138
893
31
27
1477
1332
49
35
2007
2064
26
21
2005
2247
1
13
1511
1442
12
20
1534
1316
17
2
367
235
3
1
877
787
4
2
763
733
22
21
670
768
17
27
1324
1073
13
1
849
965
3
7
1456
1617
11
2
1450
1345
4
2 2) Motor vehicles > 200 /hr and
13:00-14:00 1692 74 1459 138 1027 27 1301 26 1594 16 2054 9 1694 22 1234 11 405 3 891 1 685 22 658 17 1232 7 1037 2 1418 6 1140 6
14:00-15:00
15:00-16:00
1654
1406
58
69
1436
1358
99
82
1376
1322
31
30
1083
1027
36
30
2307
2000
33
20
1704
1731
5
9
1635
1228
26
19
1353
1033
15
14
441
718
2
3
827
1077
2
11
723
787
38
19
590
412
20
11
762
627
6
7
1172
1034
8
3
1364
1770
7
7
1402
1325
4
1
cycles 100/hr
16:00-17:00
17:00-18:00
1669
1619
82
37
978
1130
75
69
1295
1388
25
31
862
880
26
23
1853
2509
12
37
1257
1098
15
9
1478
1510
8
22
1006
1297
11
11
696
871
2
0
1061
1116
8
9
577
655
22
30
515
592
7
26
777
695
0
14
922
1196
5
7
1183
1998
2
10
1983
1117
0
2 Source: IRC : 11-1962
18:00-19:00 1850 65 1725 152 1244 25 762 25 2835 56 2177 25 1663 33 1709 47 925 16 1098 13 841 33 606 17 643 9 1225 18 1856 7 1084 7
10.6
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043 NMT Characteristics and Presented By-
Potential Magan Singh (TP/739)
ROAD INVENTORY
Key Map of Cycle Track
Dunger College
A 1.5 m
1.5 m
A’
Two way Cycle Track (Width- 3 m) Cycle User
Polytechnic
College
PBM Medical
College
ITI College
Cycle Track is not Being used by user Traffic Diversion on Cycle Track
TAZ (38)
Cycle Track at Polytechnic College
• In city almost 2 km
stretch is having cycle
track.
Polytechnic College
Dunger College Road, ROW : 24 m
Dunger College
• Bi-directional Cycle
track.
• Its located all four sides
of Polytechnic College.
• In surrounding
Educational and
3m 3m
3m 7m 1m 7m 3m 3m
residential land-use is
A 24m A’ there.
Shoulder Carriage Way (7m) Median Carriage Way (7m) Cycle Lane Shoulder
10.7
Desire Line Diagram For Cycle Trips- 2023
Top 29 OD Pairs (Having Trips more than 300)
Sr. No. Origin Destination Trips/day Purpose
Education,
1 10 10.1 1440
Health, Work
2 1 2 1309 Work, Education
4 36 25 987 Education, Work
6 13 13.1 740 Work, Education
9 53 53.1 579 Education, Work
27 6 6.1 308 Work, Education Inferences:
28 47 47.1 300 Education, Work • Highest inter zonal amount of cycle trips observed in the 1-2, 1-6, 25-36, 45-59
• Cycle trips are maximum near industrial area. 10899 trips are intra zonal trips.
10.8
Cycle Share in TAZ 2023
Cycle Trips TOTAL Trips % Share Cycle Trips TOTAL Trips % Share
Cycle Share Diagram 2023
Sr. No. TAZ Sr. No. TAZ
1 36 1570 4537 35 37 8 255 8170 3
2 10 2177 7718 28 38 16 210 6918 3
3 59 2839 11535 25 39 54 221 8409 3 Total trips 39371
4 13 1373 5720 24 40 38 195 7805 3
5 32 1598 6848 23 Total Cycle Trips 39371, Modal Share 8%,
41 20 269 11023 2
6 55 676 3155 21 42 34 145 6533 2 Major cycle producing zone is 36,10,59,13,32,55.
7 30 976 5044 19 43 31 139 6276 2
8 3 1853 9633 19 Maximum trip production is 35 % from Zone 36.
44 42 132 6454 2
9 1 2797 15455 18 45 28 132 6606 2 Maximum no. of trips is 2839 from Zone 59.
10 33 1096 6106 18
46 22 203 10338 2
11 2 1797 10454 17
12 15 1025 6737 15 Cycle % Share Map 2023
13 48 1302 8596 15
14 14 1002 7349 14
15 9 757 5601 14
16 58 844 7593 11
17 6 1526 13730 11
18 26 817 8175 10
19 35 602 6020 10
20 41 657 6733 10
21 11 793 8460 9
22 47 743 7988 9
23 50 634 7137 9
24 19 659 8122 8
25 25 1512 19055 8
26 53 716 9066 8
27 17 429 6431 7
28 4 509 8479 6
29 7 347 6586 5
30 60 365 7850 5
31 23 327 7355 4
32 43 383 9578 4
33 12 268 7113 4
34 5 360 10440 3
35 40 378 11089 3
36 44 447 13850 3
10.9

Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan

Existing Expressway
National Highway
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
11.ROAD SAFETY
Railway
Jodhpur
Jaipur
Ratangarh
251
350
134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27

Rajasthan
-
Rajasthan
Bikaner District

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1
Introduction
INTRODUCTION
DISTRICT LEVEL
Road safety refers to the methods and measures used to prevent road users
from being killed or seriously injured. Road Accidents (2012-2022) Accidents - Type of Impact
No. of Road Accidents

700
600 528
579 535 559 Veh - Veh
519 4% 1%
Factors responsible for 500 465 467 422 448
416
road crashes 400 364 Veh - Ped
1. The road 300 22%
200
2. The vehicle 73% Veh - NMT
100
3. The drivers and other
0
road users 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Veh - Animal
4. Environmental Factors Year
5. Lack of Enforcement
Accidents- Based on Severity (2012 to 2022)
Types of Road crash 400
a) Fatal 350
361 333 369 336 377
338 301 299
b) Grevious 314 288
No. of Persons
300 318 278 271 283 315
305 254
c) Minor Injury 250 285 240 255
280 207 230 220
d) Non-Injury 200 248 209 191
232 210
150 199 172 183
133
100
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
A "black-spot” is a road corridor or stretch, about 500 m long, in which either 5 to 10 road
Year
accidents, involving fatalities and grievous injuries, have been reported during the consecutive
3 calendar years. - MoRTH, India No. of Fatalities No. of Greviously Injured No. of Minor Injuries
¯
Blackspot Data (2018 – 2020) Blackspot Location
Total Total No. of
Accidents – Reason for Collision Accidents – Based on Weather
Name of Overspeeding Conditions
Place
Accidents Fatalities 5%
(3 Years) (All 3 Years) 13%
Drunken Driving 9% Sunny/Clear
Kalla petrol
10 12
pump
Driving on 16%
14% Rainy
Wrong Side
68% 75%
Mishandling of Foggy
Vehicle
INFERENCES
• A combination of factors such as awareness, execution of law and improvement in
road engineering reduced accidents in 2017.
“We observed and rectified human errors, road defects and worsening traffic congestions to improve
the safety parameter along with the launch of a special drive to curb drink and drive,”
– Bikaner S.P. (Source: Hindustan Times, 2018)
• The frequency of Road Accidents have suddenly declined from 519 in 2019 to 422 in
2020, this is due to the decrease in traffic because of COVID-19.
Legend
• Most of the accidents have taken place in Clear weather conditions, this is because
Blackspot Location
it increases the confidence level of driver, which results into over-speeding and
Kalla Petrol Pump susceptible to accidents. Source: Road Safety Cell, Bikaner; Author
COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043 Road Safety and

Master in Transport Planning, 2nd Semester Vulnerability
Presented By-
Vibhu Singh (TP/756) 11.1
ROAD SAFETY – CITY LEVEL
Accident - Type of Impact Severity of Accident
Reviewed 64 F.I.R
(2021-2022) Minor Injury
2%
Vehicle - Vehicle Non Injury 5%
Police Stations:
1.Naya Shahar Police Station 13%
19%
2.Sadar Police Station
3.Kotegate Police Station
Vehicle -
4.Kotwali Police Station Grevious
Pedestrian Fatality
5.Beechwal Police Station Injury
6.Ganga Sahar Police Station 25%
57%
7.Jai Narayan Vyas Colony 79% Vehicle - Animal
Police Station
8.Naal Police Station
Accident - Classification of Road Type of Traffic Control
0% 3%
Arterial 10%
Uncontrolled
14%
Sub Arterial Accident - Reason of Collision
70% 67%
Manually
55% 60%
Collector Controlled
31% 50%
87% 40%
Signalised 30%
Local
20%
10% 8% 8% 8%
10%
Accident - Type of Collision 0%
Accident - Abutting Landuse Overspeeding Drunken Driving on Mishandling of Others
60% Driving Wrong Side Vehicle
48.7%
50% 3% Commercial
40% INFERENCES
• Vehicle – Pedestrian impact may be caused due to unavailability of Footpath.
30% 82% of cases reported to have fatal or grevious causalities.
20.5% •
20% 15.4% 24% Public • High number of crash cases observed on the stretch of Jaipur Road contributing
35%
10% 5.1% 5.1% 2.6% 2.6% Semipublic to 55% of accidents taking place on Arterial Roads.
• 97% of accidents took place due to lack of signalized intersections.
0%
Residential • Rear End collision-type is the most common, the reason may be due to lack of
safe gap between two successive vehicles.
38% • Head-On collision took place on stretches with undivided carriageway.
• 38% accidents took place in Institutional areas, such as Near PWD Office, PBM
Industrial Hospital, LIC Office, M. N. Hospitals.
• Overspeeding is the major cause of accidents. Source: F.I.R
Source: Road Police
(Rajasthan SafetyDepartment);
Cell, Bikaner; Author

Road Safety and
Vulnerability
Presented By-
SPATIAL ANALYSIS
¯ ¯
KERNEL DENSITY ESTIMATION ACCIDENT MAPPING - SEVERITY OF ACCIDENTS
MAP – TOTAL ACCIDENTS
Legend
Total Accident
Density
¯
KERNEL DENSITY ESTIMATION
MAP – FATAL ACCIDENTS
Legend
Severity of Accidents
Fatal Minor Injury
Grevious Non Injury
INFERENCES
• Kernel Density Map of Total accidents showed
SEVERITY OF
ACCIDENTS
FATAL 19 concentration of Fatal accidents at the centre – consisting

GREVIOUS 36 of major intersections such as Museum Circle, Major Puran
Legend MINOR INJURY 3 Singh Circle.
NON INJURY 6 • A stretch of Jaipur Road consisted of 23 accidents of
Fatal Accident which 8 were Fatal & 12 were Grevious.
Density
Source:
Source: F.I.R Road Police
(Rajasthan SafetyDepartment);
Cell, Bikaner; Author

Road Safety and
Vulnerability
Presented By-
VULNERABLE ROAD USERS: FATAL ACCIDENTS
¯
ACCIDENT MAPPING – VULNERABLE ROAD 76% of Accidents involved Vulnerable Road Users
USERS (FATAL ACCIDENTS)
Total Accidents involving Vulnerable Road Users – 46
Total Fatalities involving Vulnerable Road Users – 17
Type of Collision Victim-by-mode

VEHICLE-FIXED OBJECT
6% Car
12%
VEHICLE- VEHICLE- Two

PEDESTRIAN VEHICLE Pedestrian
Wheeler
35% 59% 29%
59%
Abutting Landuse Accidents – Type of

Industrial Impact
6% Side Swipe
12%
Commercial
26% Hit with Rear End
Residential Pedestrian 41%
37% 24%
Public
Legend Semipublic
Vulnerable Road Users Head
31% On
Pedestrian 2W 23%
Accidents – Reason for Collision

4 Accidents
FATAL ACCIDENTS INVOLVING
VULNERABLE ROAD USERS
Fatalities - 5 Driving on Wrong Side INFERENCES

Grevious Inj. - 2 Negligence from Driver
6% • 76% of fatal accidents have occurred due to Overspeeding, as
6% with increase in Speed the severity of accident increases.
• 41% of fatal accidents occurred due to Rear End impact, this
11 Accidents Mishandling of Vehicle happens when driver does not maintain a safe gap or the
Fatalities - 11 12% succeeding vehicle applied brakes suddenly.
Grevious Inj. - 2
Overspeeding • 37% of fatal accidents took place in residential abutting
76% landuse.
15 Total Fatal Accidents
• 35% of type of impact for fatal accidents were Vehicle –
16 Total Fatalities Pedestrian, involving Pedestrian in road accidents.
4 Total Grevious Injuries *Others include: Overtaking from wrong side, turning without indicator, etc. Source: F.I.R (Rajasthan
Source: Police
Road Safety Cell,Department)
Bikaner; Author

Road Safety and
Vulnerability
Presented By-
VULNERABLE ROAD USERS: GREVIOUS ACCIDENTS
¯
ACCIDENT MAPPING – VULNERABLE ROAD Type of Collision Victim-by-mode
USERS (GREVIOUS ACCIDENTS)
VEHICLE VEHICLE-FIXED OBJECT Hand Drawn Other
-NMT 3% 3%
3% Cycle
3%
3%
VEHICLE- Car
PEDESTRIAN 11%
19% Two
Pedestrian Wheeler
VEHICLE-VEHICLE 19% 61%
75%
Abutting Landuse Accidents – Type of Impact

Industrial OTHERS
2% 3%
FIXED OBJECT
8%
SIDE
Commercial
Residential SWIPE
29% HEAD ON
34% 39%
19%
Public REAR
Legend
Vulnerable Road Users Semipublic END
Pedestrian 2W 35% 31%
Cyclist
INFERENCES
Accidents – Reason for Collision
GREVIOUS ACCIDENTS INVOLVING
7 Accidents • 69% of grevious accidents have occurred due to Overspeeding, as

VULNERABLE ROAD USERS
Fatalities - 0
Grevious Inj. - 9 DRUNKEN DRIVING with increase in Speed the severity of accident increases.
6% OTHERS • 39% of grevious accidents occurred due to Side Swipe impact, this
2 Accident 8%
happens when driver does not overtake the succeeding vehicle
Fatalities - 0 NEGLIGENCE FROM
NMT
Grevious Inj. - 2 properly.
DRIVER
3% • 61% of the total grevious accidents are the two-wheeler victim-by-
22 Accidents
mode that majorly had collision with car.
Fatality - 1
Grevious Inj. - 28 DRIVING ON WRONG OVERSPEEDING • 35% of grevious accidents took place in Public Semipublic abutting
SIDE 69% landuse which majorly included places such as Maharani School,
31 Total Grevious Accidents 14% Sophia School, PWD Office, etc.
01 Total Fatality
39 Total Grevious Injuries *Others include: Overtaking from wrong side, turning without indicator, etc. Source: F.I.R (Rajasthan
Source: Police
Bikaner; Author

Road Safety and
Vulnerability
Presented By-
VULNERABLE ROAD USERS: CORRIDOR ANALYSIS
¯
Legend
Vulnerable Road Users
Pedestrian 2W
2
Cyclist
1 Collision Diagram
1 Type of Collision
2 No. of Casualties
1
Rear – End Collision
Stretch 1
2 Head On
A Side Swipe
1
Right Angle
B
1
Fixed Object
Hit with Pedestrian
¯
Stretch 1 Stretch 2
1 C
D
1
2
C
2 2
INFERENCES
1 1 • 6 out of 14 accidents have occurred in the form of side swipe collision
considering both the stretches.
• Multiple casualties per accident are observed in the case of Head On,
B Rear End and Side Swipe impact-types.
• At Location A – There is no pedestrian crossing
• At Location B – Two parallel roads of different hierarchy are emerging
2 from the intersection with poor alignment.
• At Location C – Median of Major road is extending till the mid-section
of minor road.
• At Location D – Multiple minor roads are intersecting within a distance
of 30 m. from each other. Source: F.I.R (Rajasthan
Source: Police
Bikaner; Author

Road Safety and
Vulnerability
Presented By-

Urban Settlement
Churu and Partly
District Nagaur
Pakistan

Existing Expressway
National Highway
Proposed Expressway
Amritsar Jamnagar
Expressway(1557
Km.) DISTANCE
CONNECTIVITY CITY
(KMS)
Jaipur 350
Air
12.INSTITUIONAL FRAME WORK AND FINANCING Railway

Jodhpur
Jaipur
Ratangarh
251
350
134
Jaisalmer NH-11
Jaipur NH-48
Road Ajmer NH-58
Jodhpur NH-62
Udaipur NH-27

Rajasthan
-
Rajasthan
Bikaner District

0 25 50 100 150
Kilometers
200 District
2.1
INTRODUCTION
BIKANER
Bikaner district has eight sub-divisions India
called tehsils: Bikaner, Nokha,
Loonkaransar, Khajuwala, Shri RURAL URBAN
State (Rajasthan)
Dungargarh, Kolayat, Chhattargarh and
Pugal.
Division (7) Municipal
TEHSILS (8) Corporation
There are two sub-tehsils: Bajju is in Sub Tehsils (2)
Districts (33)
Kolayat and Mahajan is in Loonkaransar. Villages (1498)
Bikaner City
Gram Panchayat
Tehsils (8) (290)
Area -30,247 km2 Wards (60)
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE OF ULB’s
At the state level Secretary Local self Government Department

Ex. Engineer
Engineering Section
Director, Local Bodies
Assistant Engineer
At the Regional Level Deputy Directors
Junior Engineer
At the ULB level Municipal Corporation
Surveyor, Accountant, UDC
LDC
Chief executive officer assisted by commissioners

Elected body headed by a mayor and assisted by statutory Additional Chief Engineer, Superintending engineer
committees Accounts officer etc.
Municipal Council Revenue officer
Revenue Inspector
Revenue Office
Elected body headed by a president and assisted by statutory Commissioner assisted by executive engineer
committees Revenue officers Assistant Revenue
Assistant Inspector
Accounts officers etc.
UDL LDC
Municipal Board
Peon
Elected body headed by a chairperson and assisted by statutory Executive officers assigned by revenue officer
committees Assistant/junior engineer
Accountant etc.

INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM AND
FINANCING
Rupavath Gayathri Ram
TP/748 12.1
DISTRICT PLANNING COMMITTEE FINANCING FRAMEWORK
• District Planning Committee (DPC) is the committee created as per article 243ZD of the
Constitution of India at the district level for planning at district and below. CENTRAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE
• To consolidated the plans prepared by the Panchayats and Municipalities in the District and
to prepare a draft development plan for the district as a whole
From GOI Budget IEBR- Internal & External
• the provision of the District Planning Committee (DPC) has been incorporated in section
(Gross Tax Revenue) Budgetary resources
121 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 and Rajasthan Municipalities (Second
Amendment) Act, 1994.
To determine policies, GOI ministries/ departments

To collect, compile Central Finance Commission
programmes and plan budget
To assess the local needs and update the priorities for
and objectives of the information of development of the GRANT IN AID CENTRALLY
district within the facilities available in district, in order to SPONSORED SCHEMES
framework of National GPs, KPs and ZPs ensure maximum and
State plan objectives. regarding human and judicious utilisation of
natural resources. available resources. RAJASTHAN STATE GOVERNMENT FINANCE
Rajasthan Finance Commission Government departments

FUNCTIONS OF DPC
GRANT IN AID Plan & non- plan
revenues
To prepare integrated and To monitor, evaluate URBAN LOCAL BODIES & PANCHAYATS
comprehensive five year and review progress To prepare
or annual development under the schemes employment plan
plan for rural and urban and programmed estimate of financial
areas of the district on the being implemented in resources for
subjects enshrined in the district under the financing the district
Panchayats & Municipality decentralized plan. BLOCKS NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD
Acts. planning framework NAGAR PANCHAYATS
villages
ISSUES WARDS
• Missing link between the departments & dpc - no prep. Or approval of annual plans stated
in the acts resulted financing issues for implementing district development plans

12.2
School of Planning And Architecture, New Delhi FINANCING TP/748
UNIFIED METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
National Urban Transport Policy 2006, recommends creation of a Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (UMTA) in all cities of population of ten lakhs or more, commonly referred to as
“million plus cities”, to facilitate coordinated planning and implementation of urban transport programmes and manage integrated urban transport systems.
As of the 2011 Census, there are 53 cities of that size, but there are only 15 UMTAs existing in any form.
Megalopolis Metropolis Metropolis
• Hyderabad • Pune • Jaipur Organisational Structure of UMTA
• Bengaluru • Indore • Solapur
• Chennai • Ahmedabad
• Mumbai • Kochi
Functions of UMTA
The main object of the Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority shall be to secure the
development of an integrated, efficient, modern, multi-modal mobility system including non-
motorised means for the area falling in the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Region
Development Authority
Formulation of policy to guide the approach for developing the transport system in the region
identification of sources of finance for the development of transport infrastructure ;
identification of the need and finalization of the regulatory mechanism(s) to regulate

integration between different modes, safety, fares, interoperability, and other allied aspects ;
identification of interventions in terms of infrastructure and amenities required to be made to

achieve the object set out.
research and development on mobility, and capacity building and upgradation of skills of the
stakeholders.
Roles and Responsibilities of UMTA
Inputs in Overseeing Research

Strategic Project Ensuring project
Policy operation and Regulation Funding studies and
Planning Approval Implementation Management awareness
Formulation

12.3
UNIFIED METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT AUTHORITY - HYDERABAD
NUTP 2006, inter-alia, recommends the creation of Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (UMTA) in all million-plus cities to facilitate more coordinated planning and implementation of urban
transport programmes and projects.
Investment and funding
Area: 650 sq. km I Population: 10.8 Million
• The urban transport reforms recommend establishment of an Urban
Following is the list of departments and Organizations involved in urban affairs and urban transport in Transport Fund (UTF) so that transport initiatives are less dependent on
Hyderabad. government budgetary allocations.
• Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC • Telangana Pollution Control Board • It is envisaged that UMTA would prepare a transport investment
programme for hyderabad metropolitan area, and plan financing of
• Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority • Hyderabad Metro Rail Limited (HMRL)
projects.
(HMDA) • Directorate of Town and Country Planning
• Telangana State Road Transport Corporation (TSRTC) • Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority Process flow chart of preparing Transport Investment Programme
• Roads and Buildings Department, Telangana • National Highways Authority of India (NHAI)
• Hyderabad Metro Rail Limited (HMRL) • Airports Authority of India
Organisational Structure of UMTA Hyderabad
officers from various

Local level departments of Government
of Telangana as well as from
Hyderabad ULBs.
Government State level
Stakeholders
Central level Officers from

Indian Railways, Airports
Composition of Authority of India, NHAI,
UMTA Board
Private sector
Non-
Government Beneficiaries
Stakeholders urban transport
stakeholders
Academia

12.4
CASE STUDY - SOLAPUR
City transport system generally involves several organizations that look after various forms and aspects of the transport system and network and have overlapping
functions and areas of work.
Following is the list of departments and Organizations involved in urban affairs and urban transport in
FUNDING
Solapur.
• Housing and Urban Planning Department • Taxes - property tax, sales tax on fuel, advertisement tax
• State Urban Development Department • Portion of parking fees, congestion tax
• Public Works Department • Additional fee on PUC certificate
• National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) • Collections from traffic violation fines
• Superintendent of Police (Traffic), Solapur • Additional registration fee on
• Solapur Development Authority (SDA) • Proceeds from a “Land Value Tax” or “Betterment Levy”
• District Urban Development Agency (DUDA) • Any other fee/tax that may be decided to be used exclusively for investments in
improving urban transport infrastructure and services
• Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC)
• State Pollution Control Board, Solapur
• Regional Transport Office (RTO)
• State Level Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority
Organisational Structure of the municipal corporation

12.5
FUNCTIONS OF TRANSPORT DEPARTMENTS
Functions of city level organisations and departments in Bikaner
S.No AGENCIES FUNCTIONS
1. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • The Public Works Department has a glorious history in the development of the state since pre independence.
• The department is mainly entrusted with construction and maintenance of Roads, Bridges and Govt. buildings.
2. Regional Transport Office • Issuing driving licenses and offering vehicle registration services, the Bikaner RTO is also responsible for collection of taxes, issuing
permits, road safety measures, undertaking measures to control pollution, etc.
3. urban improvement trust • Urban Improvement Trust is an organization committed to systematic urban development. It is dedicated for providing transparent and
better services to citizens. Road improvement towards Jaipur highway- median, carriageway.
4. Bikaner Municipal Corporation • Bikaner Municipal Corporation was formed to improve the infrastructure of the town as per the needs of local population.
Functions of state level organisations and departments in Bikaner

1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) • Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation is the largest provider of intercity bus transportation in the State of Rajasthan.
• They handle over 102 inter city buses through Bikaner City.
2. Ministry of road transport and highways • The Ministry has two wings: Road's wing and Transport wing. Main Responsibilities: Planning, development and maintenance of
National Highways in the country.
3. Rajasthan State Road Development & Construction • To Rajasthan State Road Development & Construction Corporation Limited. is an entirely owned undertaking of Rajasthan Government.
Corporation Limited (RSRDC) • It was formed in the year 1979, as Rajasthan State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited.
4. Rajasthan State Bus Terminal Development Authority • It is a statutory body constituted under Rajasthan State Bus Terminal Development Authority Act
(RSBTDA)
Functions Of Central Level Organisations And Departments In Bikaner

1. Northwestern railways, IRCTC • Bikaner is served by more than 21 pairs of trains each day with multiple daily connections to Delhi, Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Surat,
Mumbai and Chandigarh.
2. Airports authority of India • Nal Air Force Station also known as Bikaner Air Force Station and Civil Airport Bikaner, is a domestic airport and an Indian Air Force
Station, which serves the city of Bikaner in Rajasthan, India. It is located at Nal, 13 km (8 mi) west of the city.
3. Indian Air Force • The civil part is looked by Indian Air Force.
Private Agencies In Bikaner

1. Bikaner good transport carrier • It is a private transport service for heavy goods and trucks.
2. Private tourism buses • There are over 6 agencies which provide private bus services in Bikaner.
• Sharma Tours and travels, Rani Bazar, Chandra Travels, Police line, Milan Tours and Travels, Rathore Tours and Travels, RBM
Tours and Travels, Pinky Tours and Travels

12.6
INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM AND FINANCING
Governance Structure Of Bikaner Functions of PWD
District Administration is headed by District Collector also popularly known as District • The major works regarding roads are looked and maintained after by Public Works
Magistrate, who is an IAS Officer. All the head of departments of district report to Department in Bikaner.
District Collector. In District, the typical Organization Structure is as follows. • The PWD is the line department of the State Government of Rajasthan.
• DISTRICT COLLECTOR
• It is a functional arm of the government for providing road infrastructure (roads, bridges,
• ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR
flyover, underpass, pathways road over bridge etc), departmental building works,
• CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PANCHAYAT
conservation of historical monuments and buildings.
• SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
• CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PANCHAYAT • PWD(Bikaner) is responsible for maintenance and construction of State Highways, District
• HEAD OF DEPARTMENT Roads, other district roads and village roads.
Working process of PWD Organisational Structure
Estimate Final bill Chief Engineer
Additional Chief engineer

Administrative Approval Check start work
Superintending Engineer PWD
Technical Section Lowest Bid Tender Accepted

City Circle Rural Circle 1 Rural Circle 2
Tender document Advertisement City Divisions Rural Divisions Rural Divisions
Funding
The major funding for projects related to roads who produce to local TAXES
levels are through: • Tax of vehicles from other states
• Own Resource (Tax and Non Tax) • General Tax/House: Green tax is a form of excise duty on any • Vehicle tax
goods or objects causing the dispersal of pollutants. It is also • Surcharges: surcharge is a fee that is
• State Finance Commission (4th State Finance Commission)
referred to as environmental or pollutant tax. added to the base cost of transporting
• Central Finance Commission (14th Finance Commission) goods
• Funds through CRIF, PMGSY, ministry of roads and transport, • Driving license fee • Green tax
MORTH, Roads infrastructure development fund (RIDF) • Vehicle fare • Registration tax
• Vehicle tax • Vehicle Tax (Other than Mechanically
• Programme funds from Central Government schemes.
• Tax on passenger vehicles Propelled)
• Other sources such as loansfrom banks. • TaX on goods vehicles • Other taxes

12.7
BUDGET ANALYSIS
INCOME EXPENDITURE BUDGET ANALYSIS OF BIKANER
Rajasthan
General Administration: • The Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) of Rajasthan for 2023-24 (at
• Staff salaries, Allowances, wages, Pensions & current prices) is projected to be Rs 13,34,410 crore.
Retirement benefits , Employment Bikaner City
establishments etc. • 73 crores have been allocated for city level in the year 2023- 2024 for the
transportation sector in Bikaner.
Public Safety • 40 crores have been allocated to Municipal corporation from which 20
• Fire fighting's, street lamps, cleaning, crores have been redirected to PWD for the construction and maintenance.
etc. • 5 crores have been allocated to the on- going schemes in Bikaner.
Transportation: Sector-wise expenditure Bikaner Budget 2022-23
• Roads, Road repaires, buses, Bridges,
Municipal Rates Sector Percentage
Pedestrian facilities, construction of bus stops. 7% 11%
and Taxes • Local Institution tax Education, Sports, Arts, and Culture 11%
• Property Tax 15% Rural Development 24%
• City Development Water Supply: Health and Family Welfare 18%
• Property Division/Department 24% Water Supply and Sanitation 8%
• Repair cost, new pipeline, maintenance, boring of 8%
Roads and Bridges 15%
wells, metering, etc.
• Miscellaneous and other 18% energy 7%
Other revenue
deposits
Receipts Sector-wise expenditure Bikaner Budget 2023-24
• Income from interest Education:
/investment/Assigned Revenue
• water Supply • Primary education, libraries, etc Sector Percentage
9%15% Education, Sports, Arts, and Culture 15%
• Judicial Grant Rural Development 24%
Public Health: 22%
• Census Grant 25% Health and Family Welfare 20%
• Hire charges, repairs & maintenance, Water Supply and Sanitation 8%
• Motor Vehicle subsidy / fire loans etc.
8%
Fighting Subsidy 20% Roads and Bridges 22%
Government grants
energy 9%
and contributions • National Urban Health Mission Other Expenses
• Entertainment Tax Subsidy
• Rents, rates & Taxes, Office maintenance, Collection from Taxes (In crores)
• Education Grant
• Special Govt. grant- solid waste Communications,, Law charges etc.
Sector 2023-2024
management , city Sanitation Miscellaneous expenses not accounted for in
the above Registration Tax 0.16
Plan
Driving License Fee 0.027
• Stamp Duty Grants Capital Expenditure Green Tax/ Pollution Tax 0.57
• Buildings, Water supply & Sewerage, Taxes on Vehicles 1.3
• Municipal Corporation grants Energy/lighting, Solid waste management ,
Capital Income Surcharges 0.8
• Grants(government) Roads, Bridges, Culverts, Causeways, Health &
Total 2.857
sanitation, etc.

12.8
PROJECTS, POLICIES & SCHEMES
PROJECTS/POLICIES/SCHEMES AIM/OBJECTIVES STATUS

Rajasthan Urban Infrastructure Development Project (RUIDP) • RUIDP Phase-I aimed at improving sustainable infrastructure facilities in six major cities of Rajasthan including
Jaipur, Bikaner, Jodhpur, Ajmer, Kota and Udaipur.
• Phase-I included rehabilitation and expansion of urban solid waste management, storm water drainage, urban
roads and bridges, slum area improvements, firefighting, emergency medical services and conservation of
historical sites.
Rajasthan Road Sector Modernisation Project • The development objective of the Rajasthan Road Sector Modernization Project for India is to improve rural
connectivity, enhance road safety, and strengthen road sector management capacity of the state of Rajasthan.
Urban Improvement Trust • Its main objective is to provide better connectivity and services to the citizens.
• Road improvement towards Jaipur highway- median, carriageway.
Ministry of Road transport and Highways • It works on Planning, development and maintenance of National Highways in the country.
Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) • The Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY), was launched by the Govt. of India to provide connectivity to
unconnected Habitations as part of a poverty reduction strategy.
• to provide all weather access to unconnected habitations.
Rajasthan State Road Development & Construction • It is engaged in the area of its operation of construction of institutionally financed infrastructure projects of
Corporation Limited highways, Bridges ROBs on BOT system.
Rajasthan State Highways Development Program • The development objective of Second Rajasthan State Highways Development Program Project for India is to
build capacity for better management of state highways
• To improve traffic flows on selected state highways in the state of Rajasthan.
State Highways Development Programme (SHDP) • State Highways play major role in economic development of the people as it connects major & important places
of the State as well as neighboring States.
• Also, development of these roads will improve tourism activities in the State as it connects major tourist places.
National Highways Development Project • The National Highways Development Project (NHDP) is a project to upgrade, rehabilitate and widen major
highways in India to a higher standard.
• The NHDP works are executed through NHAI.
Road Infrastructure Development Co of Rajasthan Ltd • It works on the highways to build, rehabilitate, operate, and transfer.
(RIDCOR) phase I
Functional On going, Functional Status Unknown

12.9

CMP, Bikaner (Analysis)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CMP, Bikaner (Analysis)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CMP, Bikaner (Analysis)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Regional Connectivity

LEGEND NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST

Rajasthan District Jaisalmer

Domestic Airports ▪ There is one existing expressway which is connecting

Total National Highways Passing in 20

Total State Highways Passing in Bikaner 1

Rajasthan District Jaisalmer

Domestic Airports ▪ There is one existing expressway which is connecting

Total National Highways Passing in 20

Total State Highways Passing in Bikaner 1

STAGE 1: BACKGROUND STUDY

STAGE 2: DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

NETWORK CH. TRAF. CH. TRAVEL CHARECTERISTICS PARKING TERMINAL

Vol. Count Land use and 1. Passenger 1.PT OD Pedestrian

Total & peak hour

Composition, Commodity Passenger demand

Attraction Rate 24 hr OD matrix for Accumulation, Mode distribution

STAGE 3: TRAVEL DEMAND MODELLING

POPULATION PROJECTION EXTERNAL TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS

Selection Of The Final Scenario

BIKANER DISTRICT Locational Attribute 4th largest city in Rajasthan

Rajasthan District Jaisalmer

Domestic Airports ▪ There is one existing expressway which is connecting

2. NETWORK CHARACTERISITICS Railway

Total National Highways Passing in 20

Total State Highways Passing in Bikaner 1

Rajasthan District Jaisalmer

Domestic Airports ▪ There is one existing expressway which is connecting

Total National Highways Passing in 20

Total State Highways Passing in Bikaner 1

1.05 - 1.31 0.13 - 0.24

> 1.31 > 0.24

Identification of Average distance

Major Roads Major Roads

Total Network Covered =

COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043

COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043

Route 4: Jaipur Rd to Nagsur (G-H) Route 1

50 Avg. Speed 16.6 31.4 31.4 31:48 31:48 00:00

COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043

Route 2 : (NW - SW) Anoopgarh to Nagaur (C-D)

Route 3: (NE – SE) Ganganagar to Napasar (E-F)

COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY PLAN – BIKANER 2043

Rajasthan District Jaisalmer

Domestic Airports ▪ There is one existing expressway which is connecting

3. TRAFFIC CHARACTERISITICS Railway

Total National Highways Passing in 20

Total State Highways Passing in Bikaner 1

5 Midblock (13.5 Hours)

Old Gajner Road – 4 L Divided S2 M5

• Mid-Block and Screen Line points are

Two LCV/ (Tata 2 Axle Truck Tractor + Animal

MID-BLOCK 1 : Towards Jaipur Road (Vehicular)

Hourly Pattern of Traffic at Mid-Block (PCU) KEY MAP

TRAFFIC PRIMARY SURVEY

Details ARM 1 ARM 2 ARM 3 ARM 4 • Traffic movement is

2.38% 0.40% 0.58%

8.55% wheeler most 36%,

and auto rickshaw