Common Law 2
Common Law 2
Common Law 2
ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
STUDENT INSTRUCTIONS
1. This form must be attached to the front of your assignment.
2. The assignment must be handed in without fail by submission date (see assessment
schedule for your course)
3. Ensure that submission date is date stamped by the reception stuff when you hand it in.
4. Late submission will not be entertained unless with prior agreement with the tutor
5. All assessable assignments must be word processed.
This assignment is intended to assess the student’s knowledge in all of the following areas.
However, greater emphasis should be given to those item marked with a
7 Knowledge of theories
(Administrative only)
LECTURER’S FEEDBACK
++
Table Of Contents
LAND TENURE
Land tenure is the relationship, whether legally or customarily defined, among people, as
individuals or groups, with respect to land. (For convenience, “land” is used here to include other
natural resources such as water and trees.) Land tenure is an institution, i.e., rules invented by
societies to regulate behaviour. Rules of tenure define how property rights to land are to be
allocated within societies. They define how access is granted to rights to use, control, and
transfer land, as well as associated responsibilities and restraints. In simple terms, land tenure
systems determine who can use what resources for how long, and under what conditions.
Land tenure is an important part of social, political and economic structures. It is multi-
dimensional, bringing into play social, technical, economic, institutional, legal and political
aspects that are often ignored but must be taken into account. Land tenure relationships may be
well-defined and enforceable in a formal court of law or through customary structures in a
community. Alternatively, they may be relatively poorly defined with ambiguities open to
exploitation.
Land tenure thus constitutes a web of intersecting interests. These include:
• Overriding interests: when a sovereign power (e.g., a nation or community has the powers to
allocate or reallocate land through expropriation, etc.)
• Overlapping interests: when several parties are allocated different rights to the same parcel of
land (e.g., one party may have lease rights, another may have a right of way, etc.)
• Complementary interests: when different parties share the same interest in the same parcel of
land (e.g., when members of a community share common rights to grazing land, etc.)
• Competing interests: when different parties contest the same interests in the same parcel (e.g.,
when two parties independently claim rights to exclusive use of a parcel of agricultural land.
Land disputes arise from competing claims.)
CUSTOMARY TENURE
Customary tenure covers 93% of the Zambian area. The recognition of customary tenure does
not bring about the registration of ownership rights, but only
the protection of use and occupancy rights. Customary land is controlled by the chiefs and their
headmen but act with the consent of their people.
One key aspect of traditional tenure is free access to land by all members of a community. In
customary areas in Zambia individual ownership, concurrent interests, and communal interests
are
recognized. Individual ownership means that the landholder or occupant has more rights and
interests in the land than any other person. The individual owns the land for as long as he wishes.
Concurrent interests occur where persons, other than the landholder, can go onto someone’s land
and use it for their own purposes. Communal interests involve the use of certain tracts of land,
which are not individually owned.
The role of the chief in most of Zambia is as regulator of the acquisition and use of land but
there are important variations in the 73 tribes between the distribution of the “interests of
control”
and “interests of benefit”. Acquisition in land is possible through the following ways: clearing of
virgin bush, as a gift, sale of (improvements on the) land, transfer of land in exchange for goods,
transfer of land in exchange of services and marriage . A stranger to
the area needs the chief’s permission to settle in the area before acquiring a piece of land.
Similarly
a chief can prohibit an individual from cultivating in a grazing area. The President
of Zambia, however, may alienate any land in the customary area if he takes the local customary
law on land tenure into consideration and if he consults the chief and the local authority in the
area
in which the land to be alienated is situated . The President can thus over-rule the decision of the
chief.
Conflicts of interests in land do not have a formal procedure. If a conflict arises over land, it
will generally be resolved by a village chief with the help of a group of elders. If this fails
recourse
is then to the Lands Tribunal however, land disputes between customary
owners are quite rare.
The security of these rights might be based on the state of mind of the chief, or a concrete
fact. The chiefs rely on village heads. Each village has
villages are normally small and the villagers know who has which rights. The customary system
has defects in the security of rights. When the chief dies or changes his opinion,
there is always a possibility that an unwanted person may be evicted. But, as noted before, the
chief rules with the consent of his or her people. Incidentally, the chief provides a letter as proof
of
ownership . A United Nations Economic Survey of Zambia in 1964 observed: “The security of
tenure provided under tribal customary laws is almost equivalent to the security provided under
freehold. Any individual who establishes residence in a village can acquire customary rights over
the land, although nobody can lay a claim
to land over which another individual has established rights. The rights are permanent unless
they
are extinguished by abandonment or death.” Others confirm more recently in similar wording the
existence of secure property rights land in the customary tenure system which allows access to
formal credit, facilitated by the State . UnFortunately the informal form of security of rights
does not satisfy western companies enough to invest in the land. It seems inevitable that
customary rights will eventually be replaced by statutory control of all private land ties between
the urban population and the chiefs have weakened considerably with time. The colonization and
State nationalization of land have
undermined the chiefs’ role in the customary tenure system. The experiences in Zambia,
however,
do not support the theory that titling brings better care of the land. More prosperous farmers in
customary areas may fence their properties, and even go to the trouble of obtaining title, with the
objective not to restrict their own activities, but to exclude their neighbors’ cattle.
The transformation of customary rights into a leasehold is in Zambia a lengthy and difficult
process, requiring a cadastral survey and approval of both the local authorities and the President.
After transformation it is uncertain whether the leaseholds on customary remain subject to local
customs and traditions. This also seems to be one of the reasons why some tradational rulers are
opposed to lands act, 1995.
RFRENCES
GLTN.NET
RESEARCHGATE.NET
FAO.ORG