Eco310 Slides Lecture 11 Market Entry Introduction 2018
Eco310 Slides Lecture 11 Market Entry Introduction 2018
Main References
————————————————————————————
(2) There is a …xed sunk cost associated with being active in the
market;
(3) The payo¤ of being active in the market depends on the number
(and the characteristics) of other …rms active in the market, i.e., the
model is a game.
Under Nash assumption, every …rm takes as given the decision of the
other …rms and makes a decision that maximizes its own pro…t.
Example
Vi ( 1 + a j ) Fi = 30 20 aj
Best responses are:
1 if 30 20 a2 0 1 if 30 20 a1 0
a1 = and a2 =
0 if 30 20 a2 < 0 0 if 30 20 a1 < 0
Payo¤ Matrix:
a2 = 0 a2 = 1
a1 = 0 (0 , 0) (0 , 30)
a1 = 1 (30 , 0) (10 , 10)
Example [2]
a2 = 0 a2 = 1
a1 = 0 ( 0 , 0 ) (0 , 30)
a1 = 1 (30 , 0) (10 , 10)
With this payo¤ matrix, the unique Nash equilibrium is
(a1 , a2 ) = (1, 1). Duopoly.
Suppose that the …xed cost were larger, F = 90. Then,
Vi (1 + aj ) Fi = 10 20 aj .
a2 = 0 a2 = 1
a1 = 0 ( 0 , 0 ) (0 , 10)
a1 = 1 ( 10 , 0) ( 30 , 30)
With this payo¤ matrix, the unique Nash equilibrium is
(a1 , a2 ) = (0, 0). No entry.
Example [3]
Suppose that the …xed cost is not as small as 50 and not as large as
90: F = 70. Then, Vi (1 + aj ) Fi = 10 20 aj .
a2 = 0 a2 = 1
a1 = 0 ( 0 , 0 ) (0 , 10)
a1 = 1 (10 , 0) ( 10 , 10)
With this payo¤ matrix, the model has two Nash equilibria: Monopoly
of …rm 1: (a1 , a2 ) = (1, 0); Monopoly of …rm 2: (a1 , a2 ) = (0, 1).
Example [4]
Two-stage game
————————————————————————————
2. Why do we estimate
Models of Market Entry?
————————————————————————————
————————————————————————————
3. Entry Models
with Homogeneous Firms
————————————————————————————
Suppose the researcher has data from M markets in the same industry.
Data = f nm , Sm , Xm : m = 1, 2, ..., M g
All the potential entrants in a market have the same pro…t function:
- Same costs, and same demand (homogenous product).
Vm ( n ) Fm
Vm (1 + nm ) < Fm Vm ( n m )
Bresnahan and Reiss (JPE, 1990) do not model explicitly the form of
price/quantity competition and consider a ‡exible model for the
variable pro…t.
Vm (n ) = Sm [Xmv βv α(n )]
Sm represents market size.
Fm = Xmf βf + δ(n ) + εm
Equilibrium conditions
Vm (1 + n ) < Fm Vm ( n )
or equivalently:
This is the ratio between total variable pro…ts with n + 1 …rms and
with n …rms, e.g., rm (1) = 1.45 means that total variable pro…ts
under duopoly are 45% larger than under monopoly,
Victor Aguirregabiria () Competition December 3rd, 2018 26 / 29
Entry models with homogeneous …rms
Main Findings:
- Entry thresholds converge quite fast after the second entrant.
- After three or four …rms, an additional entrant doesn’t a¤ect
much competition.