Title: Mastering Your Thesis: Grant and Lee - A Study in Contrasts

Embarking on the journey of writing a thesis is a monumental task, often described as both
exhilarating and daunting. For many, it's a rite of passage, a culmination of years of study and
dedication. However, the road to completing a thesis is paved with challenges, requiring meticulous
research, critical analysis, and eloquent writing. Particularly when delving into topics as intricate as
Grant and Lee - a study in contrasts - the endeavor becomes even more demanding.

Exploring the lives and leadership styles of Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee is a fascinating
endeavor, one that offers invaluable insights into the Civil War era and the men who shaped it.
However, navigating through the vast array of historical sources, deciphering conflicting narratives,
and synthesizing disparate viewpoints can be overwhelming. The task is not merely to recount
historical events but to dissect and analyze them, uncovering the underlying themes and
contradictions that define the characters of Grant and Lee.

One of the greatest challenges of writing a thesis on Grant and Lee lies in capturing the complexity
of their personalities and legacies. Grant, the pragmatic strategist with a relentless determination to
achieve victory, contrasts sharply with Lee, the noble gentleman and brilliant tactician bound by his
sense of duty and honor. Their opposing philosophies, military strategies, and personal struggles
paint a nuanced portrait of two iconic figures who shaped the course of American history.

Moreover, delving into the study of contrasts requires a meticulous approach to research and analysis.
It demands a thorough examination of primary sources, including letters, diaries, and official
records, as well as a critical evaluation of secondary literature. Balancing conflicting interpretations
and constructing a cohesive narrative that does justice to both Grant and Lee is a formidable task that
demands scholarly rigor and intellectual integrity.

In the face of such challenges, seeking assistance from reputable academic services can be
invaluable. ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ offers expert guidance and support to students embarking on
their thesis journey. With a team of experienced writers and researchers, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔
provides personalized assistance tailored to the unique requirements of each project. Whether you
need help refining your research question, organizing your argument, or polishing your prose, ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔ is committed to helping you achieve your academic goals.

In conclusion, writing a thesis on Grant and Lee - a study in contrasts - is a challenging yet
rewarding endeavor. It requires dedication, perseverance, and a commitment to scholarly excellence.
By seeking support from trusted academic services like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, students can
navigate the complexities of thesis writing with confidence and achieve their academic aspirations.
By this time, America had become a country that was starting over with the simple core belief in
equal rights for everyone. As his father soon had serious financial problems, in fact, mother raised the
future general. Both had very different backgrounds and personalities that caused them to differ in
their military leadership and accomplishments. On the other hand, Grant was raised very differently
from Lee, his father had been a tanner on the Western frontier, and he was brought to be a
hardworking man and to make something of himself. At the Battle of Monterey, Grant would gain
some respect among his peers by successfully carrying much needed ammunition to his regiment
while under fire.17 During the Civil War, Lee and Grant would implement skills learned while under
the command of General Winfield Scott. Lee ended that raid.6 Grant, was not born into the land
owning aristocracy like Lee, his family was frontier men. Lee’s father would define everything Lee
did not want to be. Layton’s poem, “Rhine Boat Trip,” and Poe’s short story, “The Masque of the
Red Death,” are vivid, graphic depictions of suffering coupled with avoidance of guilt and remedy.
To destroy the chance of success; to destroy the foundation of one’s existencee.g. by challenging the
traditional beliefs of mankind we cut (dig,sweep) the ground out from under our own feet. Page 56.
Their society might have privileges, but they would be privileges each man had won for himself.
3Forms and patterns meant nothing. 4No man was born to anything, except perhaps to a chance to
show how far he could rise. Much of the south would embrace his beliefs in which Catton wrote, “In
the end, it almost seemed as if the Confederacy fought for Lee; as if he himself was the Confederacy.
He fought so because everything he lived by was tied to growth, expansion, and a constantly
widening horizon. 1. What does it suggest? Page 55. In the spring of 1861 as the nation leaned
toward Civil War, both Grant and Lee would be forced to make very difficult decisions. Back of
them, in the 1great surge that had taken people over the Alleghenies and into the opening Western
country, there was a deep, implicit dissatisfaction with 2a past that had settled into grooves. 1. great
surge of westward settlement1. Grant’s childhood made him competitive but his lack of interest in
the curriculums at West Point would set him back militarily. Therefore, a general didn’t justify the
hopes that were placed on him. In such page, we additionally have number of images out there. Lee’s
uncles, helped draft resolutions that would lead to the Declaration of Independence, both would sign
it1. He believed that this social class of privileged aristocrats is where leaders should be chosen. By
clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. Already at an
early age, the young general was helping his father on the farm. Like Hannibal and Rommel, his
victories against superior forces in a losing cause made him famous. Layton’s poem has few words,
but powerful, bleak images and messages. By the time the war ended, both men worked to ensure
that peace quickly followed. (431) In the essay, Catton wrote, “It was a possibility not wholly
realized, in the years to come, but which did, in the end, help the two sections to become one nation
again. In the United Kingdom and some Commonwealth nations the knight is styled Sir. Grant
provinces. “A hero is person who does something for other people. He does. By graduating with
honors, Lee was assigned to the United States Army Corps of Engineers. Unshaded states had not
been admitted to the Union at the time of the War. Page 10. To destroy the chance of success; to
destroy the foundation of one’s existencee.g. by challenging the traditional beliefs of mankind we cut
(dig,sweep) the ground out from under our own feet. 3to cut the ground out from under his feet.
Visionaries with the passion of providing a better opportunity for us, as a nation, is a mindset that
needs to be embraced by everyone.
By continuing, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. Give us your email address and we’ll send
this sample there. Note that this paragraph serves as a transition from “contrast” to “comparison”.
Page 59. The vast resources and the advanced railroad system of the North would give Grant the
advantage he needed over Lee. Lee's reluctance to fight against the southern states testifies to his
high moral qualities. Catton wrote, “No man was born to anything, except perhaps to a chance to
show how far he could rise. His “laborers” were freed only after the amendment to the Constitution
abolishing slavery came into force in 1865. Robert E Lee would carry the lessons he learned as a
child with him to the Military Academy at West Point. After all, he did not advocate the extension of
slavery, but for the independence of the South. Subject-by-subject patternThis pattern allows time
enough to discuss one subject fully before the second is dealt with in a similar way. In the spring of
1861 as the nation leaned toward Civil War, both Grant and Lee would be forced to make very
difficult decisions. In three months, Lee would achieve what his predecessor General Joseph E. Both
the Into the Wild book by Jon Krakauer and it’s film adaptation written and directed by Sean Penn
are amazing works in their respective modes of media. Allow me to take this opportunity to express
my heartfelt gratitude for The Health Scholarship. Like Hannibal and Rommel, his victories against
superior forces in a losing cause made him famous. Grant battled and endured his way down the
Mississippi Valley despite his military handicaps and personal discouragements while Lee still had
faith at Petersburg after all hope was lost. In contrast, Grant believed that everyone had the
opportunity to succeed in society and that everyone had the same opportunities. Back of them, in the
1great surge that had taken people over the Alleghenies and into the opening Western country, there
was a deep, implicit dissatisfaction with 2a past that had settled into grooves. 1. great surge of
westward settlement1. Soon Grant for his success in the military field was appointed general of the
brigade. Both men shared a passion for their beliefs, a desire to succeed on the battlefield and were
intelligent and cunning warriors. You can Get the Grant And Lee A Study In Contrasts By Bruce
Catton here. By continuing, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. Lee by famed Civil War
Historian, Bruce Catton followed by six questions. The societal differences between the two men
gave insight into how each perceived the future of the States.Lee believed that landowners played a
key role in determining the success of the country. Catton explains, “He could not possibly stand by
unmoved in the face of an attempt to destroy the Union. We Have got 28 picture about Grant And
Lee A Study In Contrasts By Bruce Catton images, photos, pictures, backgrounds, and more. To
destroy the chance of success; to destroy the foundation of one’s existencee.g. by challenging the
traditional beliefs of mankind we cut (dig,sweep) the ground out from under our own feet. 3to cut
the ground out from under his feet. Also, Lee and Grant were most different when it came to loyalty.
In addition, service in the outback was burdened by an officer who could not fully engage in his
family. Please paraphrase it. 2. Strong muscle Ans.: Grant was completely different from Lee.Ans.:
Grant was completely different from Lee. Page 47.
Lee represented a way of life embedded in the tradition of aristocracy and feudalism. 3. Lee
represented a way of life embedded in the tradition of aristocracy and feudalism. Page 40. This
belief had become historically antiquated because America became the land of change. Grant And
Lee A Study In Contrasts By Bruce Catton are a topic that is being searched for and favored by
netizens today. After finishing he was assigned to engineering troops. In America, the aristocratic
society was slowly being replaced by an industrious and forward thinking society. The implication of
this statement: They were the very people who were capable of steering the country to the right
direction and who set the nation fine examples in terms of thought and behavior. Lee and Grant
would both serve under General Winfield Scott, a man whom they both admired, during his
campaign to Mexico City. But general in choosing ministers and advisers relied chiefly on the
persons he knew the height of service. Throughout the Civil War, Robert E Lee would prove himself
to be unmatched in leadership. Being a War Minister, he has accumulated extensive management
experience, although he was repeatedly reproached for incompetence required for the highest state
office. Grant believed in the well being of all people and fought for the future of the nation. The vast
resources and the advanced railroad system of the North would give Grant the advantage he needed
over Lee. Lee by famed Civil War Historian, Bruce Catton followed by six questions. Grant believed
in a balanced social structure that did not limit anyone to any particular fate. Grant and Robert E.
Lee were fierce adversaries during the Civil War. But the memory of Ulysses Grant is passed on
from generation to generation while tombstones to Robert Lee are now threatened with demolition.
In the presidency, general saw an opportunity to maintain a war victory by restoring the political
unity of the state and guaranteeing civil rights. Both became military under the pressure of family
circumstances. Back of them, in the 1great surge that had taken people over the Alleghenies and into
the opening Western country, there was a deep, implicit dissatisfaction with 2a past that had settled
into grooves. 1. great surge of westward settlement1. His “laborers” were freed only after the
amendment to the Constitution abolishing slavery came into force in 1865. By the time the war
ended, both men worked to ensure that peace quickly followed. (431) In the essay, Catton wrote, “It
was a possibility not wholly realized, in the years to come, but which did, in the end, help the two
sections to become one nation again. Hemmer, Grant was admitted to the military academy in West
Point, New York. His mother, Anne Hill Carter Lee would raise young Robert to love God, to serve
God and to serve his country. After under his command the Confederates from Kentucky were
forced out, Lincoln conferred on him the rank of Major-General. He won a Pulitzer Prize for history
in 1954 for A Stillness at Appomattox, his study of the final campaign of the war in Virginia. Page 6.
What effect can result if this sentence is changed into “They had daring and resourcefulness,too.”? 1.
What effect can result if this sentence is changed into “They had daring and resourcefulness,too.”?
Page 62. Each man was the 4perfect champion of his cause, drawing both his strengths and his
weaknesses from the people he led. 4. staunch defender of his faith, completely reliant on the people
he led 4. Already at an early age, the young general was helping his father on the farm. To destroy
the chance of success; to destroy the foundation of one’s existencee.g. by challenging the traditional
beliefs of mankind we cut (dig,sweep) the ground out from under our own feet. Page 56. Grant and
Robert E. Lee were fierce adversaries during the Civil War.
He won a Pulitzer Prize for history in 1954 for A Stillness at Appomattox, his study of the final
campaign of the war in Virginia. Page 6. His “laborers” were freed only after the amendment to the
Constitution abolishing slavery came into force in 1865. Soon Grant for his success in the military
field was appointed general of the brigade. No wonder, because they are some of the most iconic
figures in the new history of the United States. Grant would only have to decide between being a
patriot or a traitor. Under everything else, they were marvelous fighters. Additional materials, such as
the best quotations, synonyms and word definitions to make your writing easier are also offered
here. Whereas Grant refers to the type of people who try to transfer their successes from one sphere
to another, without sufficient knowledge and skills. After numerous warnings from his superiors, he
resigned in the summer of 1854. And he became it. While studying at the academy, Lee was one of
the best Cadets, not having received a single penalty from a higher command. In 1866, Congress
conferred on him the rank of general. He was considered as a passive politician who followed the
directions of Congress, instead of implementing his own ideas. You can Get the Grant And Lee A
Study In Contrasts By Bruce Catton here. Robert Lee enjoyed great respect from the opponents.
Lee’s father, Henry “Lighthorse Harry” Lee III was a revolutionary war hero and one of George
Washington’s most dependable fellow countrymen. After the end of the presidential term, Grant
departed from politics. Lee ended that raid.6 Grant, was not born into the land owning aristocracy
like Lee, his family was frontier men. The implication of this statement: They were the very people
who were capable of steering the country to the right direction and who set the nation fine examples
in terms of thought and behavior. By the time of war against Mexico (1846-48), comrades' remarks
about the excessive use of alcohol by Grant belong. Each man was the 4perfect champion of his
cause, drawing both his strengths and his weaknesses from the people he led. 4. staunch defender of
his faith, completely reliant on the people he led 4. By continuing, you agree to our Terms and
Conditions. Layton’s poem, “Rhine Boat Trip,” and Poe’s short story, “The Masque of the Red
Death,” are vivid, graphic depictions of suffering coupled with avoidance of guilt and remedy. Lee’s
father would define everything Lee did not want to be. While attending West Point, Lee was very
studious and did not join 8other cadets for evenings at the local taverns. Lee saw himself very much
in relation to his own region. General Lee graduated second in his class at West Point and received no
demerits for misconduct. By continuing, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. Yielding to the
northerners in the strength and preparedness, Lee defeated them after defeat. Both the Into the Wild
book by Jon Krakauer and it’s film adaptation written and directed by Sean Penn are amazing works
in their respective modes of media. The implication of this statement: They were the very people who
were capable of steering the country to the right direction and who set the nation fine examples in
terms of thought and behavior. Page 43.
Therefore, society depends on the leisured class. Page 42. The implication of this statement: They
were the very people who were capable of steering the country to the right direction and who set the
nation fine examples in terms of thought and behavior. Page 43. At the Battle of Monterey, Grant
would gain some respect among his peers by successfully carrying much needed ammunition to his
regiment while under fire.17 During the Civil War, Lee and Grant would implement skills learned
while under the command of General Winfield Scott. In contrast, Grant believed that everyone had
the opportunity to succeed in society and that everyone had the same opportunities. By graduating
with honors, Lee was assigned to the United States Army Corps of Engineers. Grant and Robert E.
Lee were fierce adversaries during the Civil War. Robert E Lee would carry the lessons he learned as
a child with him to the Military Academy at West Point. Both works are respectively captivating in
their portrayal of Christopher McCandless, though there are interesting differences between the two.
Their society might have privileges, but they would be privileges each man had won for himself.
3Forms and patterns meant nothing. 4No man was born to anything, except perhaps to a chance to
show how far he could rise. The Confederacy embraced Lee as their leader as well. Much of the
south would embrace his beliefs in which Catton wrote, “In the end, it almost seemed as if the
Confederacy fought for Lee; as if he himself was the Confederacy. He was brought up in a static
society where change was not known. Whether it's a Windows, Mac, iOS or Android operating
system, you will still be able to bookmark this page. Lee represented a way of life embedded in the
tradition of aristocracy and feudalism. 3. Lee represented a way of life embedded in the tradition of
aristocracy and feudalism. Page 40. Note that this paragraph serves as a transition from “contrast” to
“comparison”. Page 59. Lee’s uncles, helped draft resolutions that would lead to the Declaration of
Independence, both would sign it1. As a result, this helped the nation become whole and united
again. Of course, Ulysses proved to be luckier than Robert. Regional and national ideological
differences between the men were evident as well. Soon Grant for his success in the military field
was appointed general of the brigade. His mother, Anne Hill Carter Lee would raise young Robert to
love God, to serve God and to serve his country. It can also help avoid the monotony from the steady
use of subject-by-subject or point-by-point pattern. Page 26. Both were outstanding participants in
the Civil war. This record has never been matched and will not likely ever be achieved again. But, as
we know, the truth is always on the side of the winners. While the commander of the army of the
North, General Ulysses Grant was a slaveholder. Another difference between Grant and Lee was
evident in regards to how they perceived their way of life.Lee lived in the past, embracing tradition
and holding onto values that were predominantly antiquated. And he became it. While studying at
the academy, Lee was one of the best Cadets, not having received a single penalty from a higher
command. By continuing, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. They signify the ending of slavery
system and the establishment of an industrial capitalist system. Page 35.